DOCSLIB.ORG

State of North Carolina County of Wake in The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State of North Carolina County of Wake in The STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION No. 18-CVS-014001 COUNTY OF WAKE COMMON CAUSE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Representative David R. LEWIS, in his official capacity as Senior Chairman of the House Select Committee on Redistricting, et al., Defendants. LEGISLATIVE DEFENDANTS’ AND INTERVENOR DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Proposed Findings of Fact ...............................................................................................................2 A. History and Development of the 2017 Plans ...........................................................2 (1) North Carolina’s Redistricting Process In 2017 ..........................................2 (2) Democratic Voters are More Concentrated Than Republican Voters .......11 a. Divided Precincts or VTDs and Divided Precincts in Current and Prior Legislative Plans ............................................................13 b. Members Elected to the General Assembly in 2010, 2016, and 2018................................................................................................14 B. Legislative Defendants’ Fact Witnesses ................................................................14 (1) William R. Gilkeson, Jr. ............................................................................14 (2) Senator Harry Brown .................................................................................17 (3) Representative John R. Bell, IV .................................................................21 (4) Morgan Jackson .........................................................................................30 C. Intervenor Defendants’ Fact Witnesses .................................................................42 (1) Adrain Arnett .............................................................................................42 (2) Rev. Cathy Fanslau ....................................................................................42 (3) Aubrey Woodard ........................................................................................43 (4) Carolyn Elmore ..........................................................................................43 (5) Reginald Reid.............................................................................................44 (6) Connor Groce .............................................................................................45 (7) Ben York ....................................................................................................47 D. Plaintiffs’ Fact Witnesses ......................................................................................50 i (1) Common Cause Representative Robert “Bob” Phillips .............................50 a. Common Cause’s Legal Fees Are Funded by a National Partisan Organization. ....................................................................51 b. Common Causes Redistricting Efforts Failed Under a Democratic-Controlled General Assembly for a Decade and Continued To Fail in a Republican-Controlled General Assembly........................................................................................51 c. Common Cause Challenges the Process—Considers “Any Map” Drawn in North Carolina Unfair ..........................................52 d. Common Cause Uninvolved in Selecting the Districts It “Challenges” ..................................................................................52 e. Common Cause’s Simulated Map .................................................53 f. Common Cause’s Simulated Map for “Impartial Redistricting” Produces Districts “Essentially Identical” to Enacted Districts. ....53 g. Common Cause Analyzed Racial Data in Its Simulated Map To Ensure Compliance with the VRA ...........................................54 h. Common Cause Submitted Its Simulated Maps to the Covington Court .............................................................................54 i. Common Cause’s Simulated Map Submitted to the Legislature ...56 j. Common Cause Seeks to Force the Legislature through Litigation To Change North Carolina’s Districting Process ..........56 k. Common Cause Fully Participates in the Development of the 2017 Plans. .....................................................................................57 l. Common Cause Waits Until After November 2018 Election Results To File Suit—Seeks Redistricting Reform Suitable to Itself ...............................................................................................57 m. The 2017 Plans Produce Competitive Elections for the First Time in a Generation—Bucking Common Cause’s Definition of Partisan Gerrymandering ...........................................................58 n. Common Cause Lacks a Partisan Gerrymandering Standard ........58 (2) North Carolina Democratic Party Chairman George Wayne Goodwin.....58 a. The North Carolina Democratic Party (“NCDP”) and Its Mission. ..........................................................................................59 ii b. The NCDP Experiences Historic Success in Recruiting Democratic Candidates To Run for Elected Office Since Passage of the 2017 Plans. .............................................................60 c. The NCDP Experiences Historic Fund-raising Success Since Passage of the 2017 Plans. .............................................................60 d. The NCDP Experiences “Tremendous” Enthusiasm for the Party. ..............................................................................................61 e. The North Carolina Democratic Party (“NCDP”) Can Win an Election Without One Republican Vote. .......................................61 f. The NCDP Chairman Does Not Know What County Groupings or Specific Districts the NCDP Is Challenging. ...........63 g. The NCDP Election Measuring Tools: Democratic Support Scores and the Democratic Performance Index (“DPI”). ..............63 h. The 2017 Plans Purported Negative Impact on the NCDP and Its Members Contradicted by Facts. ..............................................64 i. The Purported “Blue Wave” in the 2018 Elections. ......................65 j. The NCDP Seeks To Take the Constitutionally Mandated Power To Draw Voting Districts from the North Carolina General Assembly. .........................................................................65 (3) Senator Dan Blue .......................................................................................66 a. Wake County Amendments ...........................................................67 (4) Dr. Kareem Crayton ...................................................................................68 (5) Representative Graig Meyer ......................................................................69 (6) Stephanie Hofeller Lizon ...........................................................................71 a. Ms. Lizon Takes Possession of Dr. Hofeller’s Files ......................71 b. Ms. Lizon Brings Dr. Hofeller’s Files To The Attention Of Common Cause ..............................................................................72 c. Plaintiffs’ Counsel Advises Ms. Lizon To Turn Over All Materials Without Restriction or Review and Advise Her That Only North Carolina-Related Documents Would Be Reviewed ...73 d. The Hofeller Documents (PTX. 124- 170; 240- 252; 329-356; 561-573; 724- 756) Are Irrelevant .................................................74 iii (7) Plaintiff Joshua Perry Brown .....................................................................74 (8) Plaintiff Rebecca Johnson ..........................................................................78 (9) Plaintiff Derrick Miller ..............................................................................80 (10) Plaintiff Lily Nicole Quick ........................................................................82 (11) Plaintiff Leon Schaller ...............................................................................84 E. Plaintiffs’ Expert Witnesses ...................................................................................86 (1) Christopher Cooper, Ph.D. .........................................................................86 a. Dr. Cooper’s Analysis of the Degree of the General Assembly’s “Being Out of Step” Is Irrelevant and Flawed ...........86 b. Dr. Cooper’s Analysis of District Lines Is Flawed and Irrelevant ........................................................................................93 c. Dr. Cooper’s Analysis of Dr. Hofeller’s Files Is Irrelevant and Flawed ..........................................................................................111 (2) Jowei Chen, Ph.D. ....................................................................................114 a. Dr. Chen’s Predominance Analysis Is Flawed ............................115 b. Dr. Chen’s Simulation Methods Failed To Implement The General Assembly’s Adopted Criteria. ........................................118 c. Dr. Chen’s Analysis of Partisan Effect Is Flawed and, Besides, Demonstrates a Very Modest Effect ............................................129 d. Dr. Chen’s Review of Dr. Hofeller’s Files Is Pure Guesswork ...140 e. Dr. Chen’s Partisan-Composition Analysis Shows That Few Plaintiffs Are Harmed ..................................................................150 f. Dr. Chen Recognizes Human Geography Can Unintentionally Produce Partisan-biased Election Results Divorced from any Intentional Partisan or Racial Gerrymandering Efforts ...............153 (3) Jonathan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Nalysts Disagree About How to Frame the Recent
    ml-l ii FROM THE CENTER O UT The Evolution of Party Politics: The March of the GOP Continues in North Carolina by Mebane Rash Whitman In March, the Center released the tenth edition of A Reactionary , Revolutionary, or Article II: A Guide to the N.C. Legislature. Article Evolutionary Election? II is a comprehensive guide to the 1995-96 General A nalystsdisagreeabout howtoframe therecent Assembly, containing profiles of each member, ef- electoral wins of the GOP in North Carolina. fectiveness rankings, demographic trends since Were the wins reactionary, that is, were voters 1975, and committee assignments. The latest edi- reacting in an angry anti-incumbent, anti-Democrat, tion reveals three major trends: (1) the significant anti-tax, anti-big government manner? Were the gains of the Republican Party, which now holds 92 wins revolutionary, a changing of the guard in terms of 170 seats in the legislature; (2) women have of which party governs the state-from Democrats, more power in the 1995-96 General Assembly be- whose party has governed the state for almost all of cause they secured plum committee chairs; and (3) the 20th century, to Republicans, who hope to gov- African-American legislators lost the speakership ern much of the 21st century? Or were they evolu- and powerful committee chairs, so their influence tionary, a single step in the long march of the has declined. Republican Party toward true competitiveness in a two-party state? The results of most elections are to some extent elections in North Carolina should not reactionary, but 1994 was not a run-of-the-mill be underestimated.
    [Show full text]
  • House/Senate District Number Name House 10 John Bell House 17 Frank Iler House 18 Deb Butler House 19 Ted Davis, Jr
    House/Senate District Number Name House 10 John Bell House 17 Frank Iler House 18 Deb Butler House 19 Ted Davis, Jr. House 20 Holly Grange House 23 Shelly Willingham House 24 Jean Farmer Butterfield House 26 Donna McDowell White House 27 Michael H. Wray House 28 Larry C. Strickland House 31 Zack Hawkins House 32 Terry Garrison House 33 Rosa U. Gill House 34 Grier Martin House 35 Chris Malone House 36 Nelson Dollar House 37 John B. Adcock House 38 Yvonne Lewis Holley House 39 Darren Jackson House 41 Gale Adcock House 42 Marvin W. Lucas House 43 Elmer Floyd House 44 Billy Richardson House 45 John Szoka House 49 Cynthia Ball House 50 Graig R. Meyer House 51 John Sauls House 52 Jamie Boles House 53 David Lewis House 54 Robert T. Reives, II House 55 Mark Brody House 57 Ashton Clemmons House 58 Amos Quick House 59 Jon Hardister House 60 Cecil Brockman House 62 John Faircloth House 66 Ken Goodman House 68 Craig Horn House 69 Dean Arp House 70 Pat B. Hurley House 72 Derwin Montgomery House 74 Debra Conrad House 75 Donny C. Lambeth House 77 Julia Craven Howard House 82 Linda P. Johnson House 85 Josh Dobson House 86 Hugh Blackwell House 87 Destin Hall House 89 Mitchell Smith Setzer House 90 Sarah Stevens House 91 Kyle Hall House 92 Chaz Beasley House 95 John A. Fraley House 96 Jay Adams House 97 Jason R. Saine House 98 John R. Bradford III House 102 Becky Carney House 103 Bill Brawley House 104 Andy Dulin House 105 Scott Stone House 106 Carla Cunningham House 107 Kelly Alexander House 108 John A.
    [Show full text]
  • NC House/Senate Candidates to Watch in 2020
    NC House/Senate Candidates to Watch in 2020 Old North State NCFREE District Member Counties Party RealFactsNC Swing Left Politics (competitive) (competitive) HOUSE Bertie, Camden, Chowan, Perquimans, Tyrrell, 1 Rep. Edward (Eddy) Goodwin R X X X (Lean R) Washington Bertie, Camden, Chowan, Perquimans, Tyrrell, 1 Emily Bunch Nicholson D Washington 2 Rep. Larry Yarborough Granville, Person R X 2 Cindy Deporter Granville, Person D 9 Rep. Perrin Jones Pitt R X X X (Lean D) 9 Brian Farkas Pitt D 12 Rep. Chris Humphrey Lenoir, Pitt R X X X (Lean R) 12 Virginia Cox-Daugherty Lenoir, Pitt D 19 Charlie Miller Brunswick, New Hanover R 19 Marcia Morgan Brunswick, New Hanover D Rep. Holly Grange seat 20 Rep. Ted Davis, Jr. New Hanover R X X 20 Adam Ericson New Hanover D 21 Rep. Raymond Smith Sampson, Wayne D X 21 Brent Heath Sampson, Wayne R 24 Rep. Jean Farmer-Butterfield Wilson D X X 24 Mick Rankin Wilson R 25 Rep. James D. Gailliard Nash D X (Lean D) 25 John Check Nash R 25 Nick Taylor Nash L NC School Boards Association 1 NC House/Senate Candidates to Watch in 2020 Old North State NCFREE District Member Counties Party RealFactsNC Swing Left Politics (competitive) (competitive) 35 Rep. Terence Everitt Wake D X X X (Lean D) 35 Fred Von Canon Wake R 35 Michael Nelson Wake L 36 Rep. Julie von Haefen Wake D X X X (Lean D) 36 Kim Coley Wake R 36 Bruce Basson Wake L 37 Rep. Sydney Batch Wake D X X X X (Lean R) 37 Erin Pare Wake R 37 Liam Leaver Wake L 40 Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • September 19, 2017 the President the White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President
    September 19, 2017 The President The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: We thank you for your attention to advancing pro-life issues since taking office, including giving our states the freedom to direct the spending of our Title X family planning dollars to entities that match our states’ needs and values. Today, we are writing to urge you to give our states similar flexibility in our Medicaid programs. Medicaid is the largest taxpayer funding stream for the nation’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood. In fact, according to research by the Charlotte Lozier Institute, Planned Parenthood commands 35% of the abortion market. In the wake of yet another state (South Carolina) seeking the same flexibility with Medicaid dollars, combined with the recent ruling in the 8th Circuit US Court of Appeals approving Arkansas’ decision not to fund abortion providers in their Medicaid program, it is essential that your administration respond quickly. It is time to remove the administrative barrier to our states’ right to direct dollars away from abortion providers: Medicaid guidance issued by the Obama administration.1 We are a coalition of almost two hundred pro-life women lawmakers in forty-three states and at the federal level. We are devoted to measures that enhance the well-being of women and show respect for the intrinsic value of every human life in our states. We have invited other lawmakers to join us on this letter; our male and female colleagues in state legislatures with whom we have gone as far as we can to ‘defund’ abortion providers with the tools we have.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report to Highlight the Issues (I.E
    ONE STEP FORWARD, TWO STEPS BACK FOR CLEAN ENERGY? Representatives Dean Arp, John Szoka, and Sam Watford introduced House Bill 589, “Competitive Energy Solutions for North Carolina” during the 2017 session. This bill took small steps towards increasing the role solar plays in the state’s energy mix by creating a competitive bidding process and by expanding rooftop solar. Senator Harry Brown added a moratorium on wind energy projects, claiming NC’s military operations would be under threat by wind turbines. Senator Brown used the once bipartisan supported clean energy bill as an attempt to pit solar against wind. Governor Cooper refused to allow Brown to claim victory: after signing H589 into law, Cooper immediately issued an executive order to the Dept. of Environmental Quality asking for the expedition of wind project permits. No 18-month ban will stop this clean energy source from moving forward. WATER, AIR, AND HEALTH Legislators continued to put the water, air, and health of North Carolinians at risk throughout the 2017 legislative long session. State lawmakers approved a bill that would allow companies to spray “garbage juice” into our air; passed a policy that limits the amount of financial compensation a resident or property owner can receive for detrimental health and livelihood impacts in hog pollution or other nuisance cases; and thumbed their noses at local control over environmental safeguards by prohibiting state regulators from making stricter water quality rules than the federal standards (assuming those even exist). Overall, leaders of the General Assembly showed a lack of empathy for their constituents and clear preference for polluters with deep pockets in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- House Principal Clerk's Office (919) 733-7760 2021 N.C
    North Carolina General Assembly HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK'S (919) 733-7760 OFFICE 2021 N.C. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPRESENTATION BY COUNTY COUNTY DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVES Alamance 63 Ricky Hurtado 64 Dennis Riddell Alexander 94 Jeffrey Elmore Alleghany 90 Sarah Stevens Anson 55 Mark Brody Ashe 93 Ray Pickett Avery 85 Dudley Greene Beaufort 79 Keith Kidwell Bertie 1 Edward C. Goodwin Bladen 22 William D. Brisson Brunswick 17 Frank Iler 19 Charles W. Miller Buncombe 114 Susan C. Fisher 115 John Ager 116 Brian Turner Burke 86 Hugh Blackwell 112 David Rogers Cabarrus 67 Wayne Sasser 82 Kristin Baker, M.D. 83 Larry G. Pittman Caldwell 87 Destin Hall Camden 1 Edward C. Goodwin Carteret 13 Pat McElraft Caswell 50 Graig R. Meyer Catawba 89 Mitchell S. Setzer 96 Jay Adams -1- Chatham 54 Robert T. Reives, II Cherokee 120 Karl E. Gillespie Chowan 1 Edward C. Goodwin Clay 120 Karl E. Gillespie Cleveland 110 Kelly E. Hastings 111 Tim Moore Columbus 16 Carson Smith 46 Brenden H. Jones Craven 3 Steve Tyson 79 Keith Kidwell Cumberland 42 Marvin W. Lucas 43 Diane Wheatley 44 William O. Richardson 45 John Szoka Currituck 6 Bobby Hanig Dare 6 Bobby Hanig Davidson 80 Sam Watford 81 Larry W. Potts Davie 77 Julia C. Howard Duplin 4 Jimmy Dixon Durham 29 Vernetta Alston 30 Marcia Morey 31 Zack Hawkins 54 Robert T. Reives, II Edgecombe 23 Shelly Willingham Forsyth 71 Evelyn Terry 72 Amber M. Baker 73 Lee Zachary 74 Jeff Zenger 75 Donny Lambeth Franklin 7 Matthew Winslow Gaston 108 John A. Torbett 109 Dana Bumgardner 110 Kelly E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch 5 NC Legislature.Indd
    The State Legislature The General Assembly is the oldest governmental body in North Carolina. According to tradition, a “legislative assembly of free holders” met for the first time around 1666. No documentary proof, however, exists proving that this assembly actually met. Provisions for a representative assembly in Proprietary North Carolina can be traced to the Concessions and Agreements, adopted in 1665, which called for an unicameral body composed of the governor, his council and twelve delegates selected annually to sit as a legislature. This system of representation prevailed until 1670, when Albemarle County was divided into three precincts. Berkeley Precinct, Carteret Precinct and Shaftsbury Precinct were apparently each allowed five representatives. Around 1682, four new precincts were created from the original three as the colony’s population grew and the frontier moved westward. The new precincts were usually allotted two representatives, although some were granted more. Beginning with the Assembly of 1723, several of the larger, more important towns were allowed to elect their own representatives. Edenton was the first town granted this privilege, followed by Bath, New Bern, Wilmington, Brunswick, Halifax, Campbellton (Fayetteville), Salisbury, Hillsborough and Tarborough. Around 1735 Albemarle and Bath Counties were dissolved and the precincts became counties. The unicameral legislature continued until around 1697, when a bicameral form was adopted. The governor or chief executive at the time, and his council constituted the upper house. The lower house, the House of Burgesses, was composed of representatives elected from the colony’s various precincts. The lower house could adopt its own rules of procedure and elect its own speaker and other officers.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ..................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 2 ARGUMENT .............................................................................................................................. 5 I. Legislative Defendants Must Provide the Information Requested in the Second Set of Interrogatories ............................................................................................................. 5 II. In the Alternative, or if Legislative Defendants Do Not Provide The Home Addresses By March 1, the Court Should Bar Legislative Defendants From Defending the 2017 Plans on the Basis of Any Incumbency Theory................................. 7 III. The Court Should Award Fees and Expenses and Other Appropriate Relief ..................... 8 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................... 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .................................................................................................. 11 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Cloer v. Smith , 132 N.C. App. 569, 512 S.E.2d 779 (1999)............................................................................ 7 F. E. Davis
    [Show full text]
  • Who's on the Primary Ballot?
    Who’s on the primary ballot? (i) Incumbent n U.S. HOUSE BOARD OF EDUCATION, CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT BOARD OF EDUCATION, DISTRICT 1 (vote for two) DISTRICT 3 (nonpartisan)* 5TH DISTRICT Republican Democratic Democratic Brian Lee Shipwash (i) Erlie Coe (i) Chenita Barber Johnson Leigh Truelove Jenny Marshall Malishai (Shai) Woodbury BOARD OF EDUCATION, DD Adams Alex Bailand Bohannon SHERIFF DISTRICT 4 (nonpartisan)* Republican Barbara Hanes Burke Republican Terri Mosley (i) Virginia Foxx (i) Eunice Campbell David S. Grice (i) Dillon Gentry SHERIFF BOARD OF EDUCATION, Gerald K. Hege Sr. Cortland J. Meader Jr. Richie Simmons Republican DISTRICT 2 (vote for four) 13TH DISTRICT Greg Wood Jamie Goad Republican Democratic REGISTER OF DEEDS Steve C. Hiatt Lida Calvert Hayes (i) Ervin Odum Kathy Manning Republican Adam Coker Dana Caudill Jones (i) E. Vann Tate David B. Singletary (i) Michael E. Horne n N.C. SENATE Lori Goins Clark (i) David T. Rickard (i) n WATAUGA Leah H. Crowley 29TH DISTRICT n DAVIE REFERENDUM (Davidson) SHERIFF Local sales and use tax of COUNTY COMMISSIONER Republican Democratic 0.25 percent (vote for two) Eddie Gallimore Clif Kilby For Sam Watford Bobby F. Kimbrough Jr. Republican Against Tim Wooten 31ST DISTRICT John H. Ferguson (i) Republican Benita Finney COUNTY COMMISSIONER, (Forsyth, Davie, Yadkin) Charles Odell Williams DISTRICT 5 Republican Ernie G. Leyba William T. (Bill) Robert Wisecarver (i) Republican James V. Blakley Joyce Krawiec (i) Schatzman (i) Tommy Sofield Peter Antinozzi SHERIFF Allen Trivette Dan Barrett n ALLEGHANY 34TH DISTRICT Republican SHERIFF (Yadkin) COUNTY COMMISSIONER J.D. Hartman (i) Republican Mark S.
    [Show full text]
  • No. Coa19-384 Tenth District North Carolina Court Of
    NO. COA19-384 TENTH DISTRICT NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS ******************************************** NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as SPEAKER OF THE NORTH CAROLINA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES; PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SENATE, Defendants-Appellants. ************************************************************* MOTION BY THE NORTH CAROLINA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE ************************************************************* ROBERT E. HARRINGTON ADAM K. DOERR ERIK R. ZIMMERMAN TRAVIS S. HINMAN ROBINSON, BRADSHAW & HINSON, P.A. 101 N. Tryon St., Suite 1900 Charlotte, NC 28246 (704) 377-2536 TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA: The North Carolina Legislative Black Caucus (the “Caucus”) respectfully moves this Honorable Court for leave to file the attached brief amicus curiae in support of Plaintiff North Carolina State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (“NAACP”). Pursuant to North Carolina Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(i), the Caucus sets forth here the nature of its interests, the issues of law its brief will address, its positions on those issues, and the reasons why it believes that an amicus curiae brief is desirable. NATURE OF THE AMICUS’S INTEREST The Caucus is an association of 37 North Carolina State Senators and Representatives of African American, American Indian, and Asian-American Indian heritage. It is a vehicle designed to exercise unified political power for the betterment of people of color in North Carolina and, consequently, all North Carolinians; to ensure that the views and concerns of African Americans and communities of color more broadly are heard and acted on by elected representatives; and to further develop the political consciousness of citizens of all communities and cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • 29 Counties Served by Vidant Health 2020 Legislative
    29 COUNTIES SERVED BY VIDANT HEALTH 2020 LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATION COUNTY SENATOR REPRESENTATIVE Beaufort Erica Smith-D Keith Kidwell-R Bertie Erica Smith-D Edward Goodwin-R Camden Bob Steinburg-R Edward Goodwin-R Carteret Norman Sanderson-R Pat McElraft-R Chowan Bob Steinburg-R Edward Goodwin-R Craven Norman Sanderson-R Michael Speciale-R; Keith Kidwell-R Currituck Bob Steinburg-R Bobby Hanig-R Dare Bob Steinburg-R Bobby Hanig-R Duplin Brent Jackson-R Jimmy Dixon-R Edgecombe Toby Fitch-D Shelly Willingham-D Gates Bob Steinburg-R Howard Hunter-D Greene Don Davis-D John Bell-R Halifax Toby Fitch-D Michael Wray-D Hertford Bob Steinburg-R Howard Hunter-D Hyde Bob Steinburg-R Bobby Hanig-R Jones Harry Brown-R Pat McElraft-R Lenoir Jim Perry-R Chris Humphrey-R Martin Erica Smith-D Shelly Willingham-D Nash Rick Horner-R James Gaillard-D; Lisa Stone Barnes-R Northampton Erica Smith-D Michael Wray-D Onslow Harry Brown-R George Cleveland-R; Phil Shepard-R; Jimmy Dixon-R Pamlico Norman Sanderson-R Bobby Hanig-R Pasquotank Bob Steinburg-R Howard Hunter-D Perquimans Bob Steinburg-R Edward Goodwin-R Pitt Don Davis-D Kandie Smith-D; Perrin Jones-R; Chris Humphrey-R Tyrrell Bob Steinburg-R Edward Goodwin-R Washington Bob Steinburg-R Edward Goodwin-R Wayne Jim Perry-R Raymond Smith-D; John Bell-R Wilson Toby Fitch-D Jean Farmer-Butterfield-D SENATORS – DEMOCRATS (3): Toby Fitch; Erica Smith; Don Davis; REPUBLICANS (6): Harry Brown; Rick Horner; Brent Jackson; Jim Perry; Norman Sanderson; Bob Steinburg HOUSE OF REPS.
    [Show full text]
  • To the User | NCCPPR
    Search this Site North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research ...Your source for nonpartisan research & analysis Home › NC Legislature › Citizens' Guide to the 2011-2012 N.C. Legislature Citizens' Guide to the 2011-2012 N.C. Legislature To The User How to Use the Citizens' Guide to the Legislature The North Carolina Senate Profiles of NC Senators The North Carolina House of Representatives Profiles of NC Representatives Legislative Session Information Rankings of Legislators' Effectiveness, Attendance, Roll Call Participation, and Most Influential Lobbyists Click Here To Take A Video Tour of the Online Guide Trends in the North Carolina General Assembly N.C. Center for Public Policy Donate Now » Join Now » Research Support our work, and thereby Become a part of th 5 W. Hargett St., Suite 01 North Carolina citizens, by Stay informed on th P.O. Box 430 donating through the Network policy development Raleigh, NC 27602 for Good, a donation site for world. nonprofit groups. 919-832-2839 919-832-2847 Search this Site North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research ...Your source for nonpartisan research & analysis Home › NC Legislature › Citizens' Guide to the 2011-2012 N.C. Legislature › To The User To The User An informed electorate is the essence of democratic government, but more than a general understanding of important issues is required if government is to fully serve the public’s interests. Informed citizens must also know something about the men and women elected to serve them as legislators. This guide has been prepared to acquaint the people of North Carolina with their state Senators and Representatives.
    [Show full text]