DOCSLIB.ORG

Arithmetic Duality Theorems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arithmetic Duality Theorems Arithmetic Duality Theorems Second Edition J.S. Milne Copyright c 2004, 2006 J.S. Milne. The electronic version of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Li- cense: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ Briefly, you are free to copy the electronic version of the work for noncommercial purposes under certain conditions (see the link for a precise statement). Single paper copies for noncommercial personal use may be made without ex- plicit permission from the copyright holder. All other rights reserved. First edition published by Academic Press 1986. A paperback version of this work is available from booksellers worldwide and from the publisher: BookSurge, LLC, www.booksurge.com, 1-866-308-6235, [email protected] BibTeX information @book{milne2006, author={J.S. Milne}, title={Arithmetic Duality Theorems}, year={2006}, publisher={BookSurge, LLC}, edition={Second}, pages={viii+339}, isbn={1-4196-4274-X} } QA247 .M554 Contents Contents iii I Galois Cohomology 1 0 Preliminaries............................ 2 1 Duality relative to a class formation . ............. 17 2 Localfields............................. 26 3 Abelianvarietiesoverlocalfields.................. 40 4 Globalfields............................. 48 5 Global Euler-Poincar´echaracteristics................ 66 6 Abelianvarietiesoverglobalfields................. 72 7 An application to the conjecture of Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer . 93 8 Abelianclassfieldtheory......................101 9 Otherapplications..........................116 AppendixA:Classfieldtheoryforfunctionfields............126 II Etale Cohomology 139 0 Preliminaries............................139 1 Localresults.............................148 2 Globalresults:preliminarycalculations..............163 3 Globalresults:themaintheorem..................176 4 Globalresults:complements....................188 5 Globalresults:abelianschemes...................197 6 Global results: singular schemes ..................205 7 Globalresults:higherdimensions.................208 III Flat Cohomology 217 0 Preliminaries............................218 1 Local results: mixed characteristic, finite group schemes . 232 2 Localresults:mixedcharacteristic,abelianvarieties........245 3 Global results: number field case ..................252 iii iv 4 Localresults:mixedcharacteristic,perfectresiduefield......257 5 Twoexactsequences........................266 6 Local fields of characteristic p ...................272 7 Localresults:equicharacteristic,finiteresiduefield........280 8 Globalresults:curvesoverfinitefields,finitesheaves.......289 9 Global results: curves over finite fields, N´eronmodels.......294 10 Localresults:equicharacteristic,perfectresiduefield.......300 11 Globalresults:curvesoverperfectfields..............304 AppendixA:Embeddingfinitegroupschemes..............307 AppendixB:Extendingfinitegroupschemes..............312 Appendix C: Biextensions and N´eronmodels..............316 Bibliography 328 Index 337 v Preface to the first edition. In the late fifties and early sixties, Tate (and Poitou) found some important du- ality theorems concerning the Galois cohomology of finite modules and abelian varieties over local and global fields. About 1964, Artin and Verdier extended some of the results toetale ´ cohomol- ogy groups over rings of integers in local and global fields. Since then many people (Artin, Bester, B´egueri, Mazur, McCallum, the au- thor, Roberts, Shatz, Vvedens’kii) have generalized these results to flat cohomol- ogy groups. Much of the best of this work has not been fully published. My initial purpose in preparing these notes was simply to write down a complete set of proofs before they were forgotten, but I have also tried to give an organized account of the whole subject. Only a few of the theorems in these notes are new, but many results have been sharpened, and a significant proportion of the proofs have not been published before. The first chapter proves the theorems on Galois cohomology announced by Tate in his talk at the International Congress at Stockholm in 1962, and describes later work in the same area. The second chapter proves the theorem of Artin and Verdier onetale ´ cohomology and also various generalizations of it. In the final chapter improvements using flat cohomology are described. As far as possible, theorems are proved in the context in which they are stated: thus theorems on Galois cohomology are proved using only Galois cohomology, and theorems onetale ´ cohomology are proved using onlyetale ´ cohomology. Each chapter begins with a summary of its contents; each section ends with a list of its sources. It is a pleasure to thank all those with whom I have discussed these questions over the years, but especially M. Artin, P. Berthelot, L. Breen, S. Bloch, K. Kato, S. Lichtenbaum, W. McCallum, B. Mazur, W. Messing, L. Roberts, and J. Tate. Parts of the author’s research contained in this volume have been supported by the National Science Foundation. Finally, I mention that, thanks to the computer, it has been possible to produce this volume without recourse to typist, copy editor1, or type-setter. 1Inevitably, the sentence preceding this in the original contained a solecism vi Preface to the second edition. A perfect new edition would fix all the errors, improve the exposition, update the text, and, of course, being perfect, it would also exist. Unfortunately, these conditions are contradictory. For this version, I have translated the original word- processor file into TEX, fixed all the errors that I am aware of, made a few minor improvements to the exposition, and added a few footnotes. Significant changes to the text have been noted in the footnotes. The number- ing is unchanged from the original (except for II 3.18). All footnotes have been added for this edition except for those on p 26 and p 284. There are a few minor changes in notation: canonical isomorphisms are often denoted ' rather than , and, lacking a Cyrillic font, I use III as a substitute for the Russian letter shah. I thank the following for providing corrections and comments on earlier ver- sions: Ching-Li Chai, Matthias F¨ohl, Cristian Gonzalez-Aviles, David Harari, Eugene Kushnirsky, Bill McCallum, Bjorn Poonen, Jo¨el Riou, and others. Since most of the translation was done by computer, I hope that not many new misprints have been introduced. Please send further corrections to me at [email protected]. 20.02.2004. First version on web. 07.08.2004. Proofread against original again; fixed many misprints and minor errors; improved index; improved TEX, including replaced III with the correct Cyrillic X. 01.07.2006. Minor corrections; reformatted for reprinting. vii Notations and Conventions We list our usual notations and conventions. When they are not used in a particu- lar section, this is noted at the start of the section. A global field is a finite extension of Q or is finitely generated and of finite transcendence degree one over a finite field. A local field is R, C, or a field that is locally compact relative to a discrete valuation. Thus it is a finite extension of Qp, Fp..T //,orR.Ifv is a prime of a global field, then jjv denotes the valuation at v normalized in the usual way so that the product formula holds, and Ov Dfa 2 K jjajv Ä 1g. The completions of K and Ov relative to jjv are b denoted by Kv and Ov: For a field K, Ka and Ks denote the algebraic and separable algebraic clo- sures of K,andKab denotes the maximal abelian extension of K. For a local un field K, K is the maximal unramified extension of K. We sometimes write GK s for the absolute Galois group Gal.K =K/ of K and GF=K for Gal.F=K/.By char.K/ we mean the characteristic exponent of K, that is, char.K/ is p if K has characteristic p ¤ 0 and is 1 otherwise. For a Hausdorff topological group G, Gab is the quotient of G by the closure of its commutator subgroup. Thus, Gab is ab ab the maximal abelian Hausdorff quotient group of G,andGK D Gal.K =K/. If M is an abelian group (or, more generally, an object in an abelian category) .m/ and m is an integer, then Mm and M are the kernel and cokernelS of multi- n plication by m on M . Moreover, M.m/ isT the m-primary component m Mm n and Mmdiv is the m-divisibleT subgroup n Im.m W M ! M/.Thedivisible c subgroup2 M of M is M . We write T M for lim M n and M for the div m m-div m m completion of M with respect to the topology defined by the subgroups of finite index (sometimes the subgroups are restricted to those of finite index a power of a fixed integer m, and sometimes to those that are open with respect to some topology on M ). When M is finite, ŒM denotes its order. A group M is of cofinite-type if it is torsion and Mm is finite for all integers m. As befits a work with the title of this one, we shall need to consider a great many different types of duals. In general, M will denote Homcts.M; Q=Z/,the group of continuous characters of finite order of M . Thus, if M is discrete torsion abelian group, then M is its compact Pontryagin dual, and if M is a profinite abelian group, then M is its discrete torsion Pontryagin dual. If M is a module D s over GK for some field K,thenM denotes the dual Hom.M; K /;whenM D is a finite group scheme, M is the Cartier dual Hom.M;Gm/. The dual (Picard 2This should be called the subgroup of divisible elements — it contains the largest divisible subgroup of M but it need not be divisible itself. A similar remark applies to the m-divisible subgroup. viii variety) of an abelian variety is denoted by At . For a vector space M , M _ denotes the linear dual of M . All algebraic groups and group schemes will be commutative (unless stated otherwise). If T is a torus over a field k,thenX .T / is the group Homks .Gm;Tks / of cocharacters (also called the multiplicative one-parameter subgroups). There seems to be no general agreement on what signs should be used in homological algebra. Fortunately, the signs of the maps in these notes will not be important, but the reader should be aware that when a diagram is said to commute, it may only commute up to sign.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pontrjagin Duality for Finite Groups
    PONTRJAGIN DUALITY FOR FINITE GROUPS Partha Sarathi Chakraborty The Institute of Mathematical Sciences Chennai e1; ··· ; en : basis for V . ∗ V := fφjφ : V ! C linear map g. ∗ hφi ; ej i := φi (ej ) := δij , φi ; ··· ; φn, dual basis for V . Dual of a map, T : V ! W T ∗ : W ∗ ! V ∗; T ∗(φ)(v) = φ(T (v)). T : V ! W ; S : W ! U; (S ◦ T )∗ = T ∗ ◦ S∗ : U∗ ! W ∗ Pontryagin duality: classical formulation Motivation from linear algebra Limitations of the classical formulation dual of a cyclic group Some algebraic structures duals for direct sums and products The finite group case Pontryagin Duality Motivation: duality for vector spaces Dual of a vector space V : a finite dimensional vector space over C. ∗ V := fφjφ : V ! C linear map g. ∗ hφi ; ej i := φi (ej ) := δij , φi ; ··· ; φn, dual basis for V . Dual of a map, T : V ! W T ∗ : W ∗ ! V ∗; T ∗(φ)(v) = φ(T (v)). T : V ! W ; S : W ! U; (S ◦ T )∗ = T ∗ ◦ S∗ : U∗ ! W ∗ Pontryagin duality: classical formulation Motivation from linear algebra Limitations of the classical formulation dual of a cyclic group Some algebraic structures duals for direct sums and products The finite group case Pontryagin Duality Motivation: duality for vector spaces Dual of a vector space V : a finite dimensional vector space over C. e1; ··· ; en : basis for V . ∗ hφi ; ej i := φi (ej ) := δij , φi ; ··· ; φn, dual basis for V . Dual of a map, T : V ! W T ∗ : W ∗ ! V ∗; T ∗(φ)(v) = φ(T (v)). T : V ! W ; S : W ! U; (S ◦ T )∗ = T ∗ ◦ S∗ : U∗ ! W ∗ Pontryagin duality: classical formulation Motivation from linear algebra Limitations of the classical formulation dual of a cyclic group Some algebraic structures duals for direct sums and products The finite group case Pontryagin Duality Motivation: duality for vector spaces Dual of a vector space V : a finite dimensional vector space over C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 3. Resolutions and Derived Functors (GL)
    Lecture 3. Resolutions and derived functors (GL) This lecture is intended to be a whirlwind introduction to, or review of, reso- lutions and derived functors { with tunnel vision. That is, we'll give unabashed preference to topics relevant to local cohomology, and do our best to draw a straight line between the topics we cover and our ¯nal goals. At a few points along the way, we'll be able to point generally in the direction of other topics of interest, but other than that we will do our best to be single-minded. Appendix A contains some preparatory material on injective modules and Matlis theory. In this lecture, we will cover roughly the same ground on the projective/flat side of the fence, followed by basics on projective and injective resolutions, and de¯nitions and basic properties of derived functors. Throughout this lecture, let us work over an unspeci¯ed commutative ring R with identity. Nearly everything said will apply equally well to noncommutative rings (and some statements need even less!). In terms of module theory, ¯elds are the simple objects in commutative algebra, for all their modules are free. The point of resolving a module is to measure its complexity against this standard. De¯nition 3.1. A module F over a ring R is free if it has a basis, that is, a subset B ⊆ F such that B generates F as an R-module and is linearly independent over R. It is easy to prove that a module is free if and only if it is isomorphic to a direct sum of copies of the ring.
    [Show full text]
  • A Algebraic Varieties
    A Algebraic Varieties A.1 Basic definitions Let k[X1,X2,...,Xn] be a polynomial algebra over an algebraically closed field k with n indeterminates X1,...,Xn. We sometimes abbreviate it as k[X]= k[X1,X2,...,Xn]. Let us associate to each polynomial f(X)∈ k[X] its zero set n V(f):= {x = (x1,x2,...,xn) ∈ k | f(x)= f(x1,x2,...,xn) = 0} n 2in the n-fold product set k of k. For any subset S ⊂ k[X] we also set V(S) = f ∈S V(f). Then we have the following properties: n (i) 2V(1) =∅,V(0) =k . = (ii) i∈I V(Si) V( i∈I Si). (iii) V(S1) ∪ V(S2) = V(S1S2), where S1S2 := {fg | f ∈ S1,g∈ S2}. The inclusion ⊂ of (iii) is clear. We will prove only the inclusion ⊃. For x ∈ V(S1S2) \ V(S2) there is an element g ∈ S2 such that g(x) = 0. On the other hand, it ∀ ∀ follows from x ∈ V(S1S2) that f(x)g(x) = 0( f ∈ S1). Hence f(x)= 0( f ∈ S1) and x ∈ V(S1). So the part ⊃ was also proved. By (i), (ii), (iii) the set kn is endowed with the structure of a topological space by taking {V(S) | S ⊂ k[X]} to be its closed subsets. We call this topology of kn the Zariski topology. The closed subsets V(S) of kn with respect to it are called algebraic sets in kn. Note that V(S)= V(S), where S denotes the ideal of k[X] generated by S.
    [Show full text]
  • Algebraic Number Theory II
    Algebraic number theory II Uwe Jannsen Contents 1 Infinite Galois theory2 2 Projective and inductive limits9 3 Cohomology of groups and pro-finite groups 15 4 Basics about modules and homological Algebra 21 5 Applications to group cohomology 31 6 Hilbert 90 and Kummer theory 41 7 Properties of group cohomology 48 8 Tate cohomology for finite groups 53 9 Cohomology of cyclic groups 56 10 The cup product 63 11 The corestriction 70 12 Local class field theory I 75 13 Three Theorems of Tate 80 14 Abstract class field theory 83 15 Local class field theory II 91 16 Local class field theory III 94 17 Global class field theory I 97 0 18 Global class field theory II 101 19 Global class field theory III 107 20 Global class field theory IV 112 1 Infinite Galois theory An algebraic field extension L/K is called Galois, if it is normal and separable. For this, L/K does not need to have finite degree. For example, for a finite field Fp with p elements (p a prime number), the algebraic closure Fp is Galois over Fp, and has infinite degree. We define in this general situation Definition 1.1 Let L/K be a Galois extension. Then the Galois group of L over K is defined as Gal(L/K) := AutK (L) = {σ : L → L | σ field automorphisms, σ(x) = x for all x ∈ K}. But the main theorem of Galois theory (correspondence between all subgroups of Gal(L/K) and all intermediate fields of L/K) only holds for finite extensions! To obtain the correct answer, one needs a topology on Gal(L/K): Definition 1.2 Let L/K be a Galois extension.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2008.10677V3 [Math.CT] 9 Jul 2021 Space Ha Hoyepiil Ea Ihtewr Fj Ea N194 in Leray J
    On sheaf cohomology and natural expansions ∗ Ana Luiza Tenório, IME-USP, [email protected] Hugo Luiz Mariano, IME-USP, [email protected] July 12, 2021 Abstract In this survey paper, we present Čech and sheaf cohomologies – themes that were presented by Koszul in University of São Paulo ([42]) during his visit in the late 1950s – we present expansions for categories of generalized sheaves (i.e, Grothendieck toposes), with examples of applications in other cohomology theories and other areas of mathematics, besides providing motivations and historical notes. We conclude explaining the difficulties in establishing a cohomology theory for elementary toposes, presenting alternative approaches by considering constructions over quantales, that provide structures similar to sheaves, and indicating researches related to logic: constructive (intuitionistic and linear) logic for toposes, sheaves over quantales, and homological algebra. 1 Introduction Sheaf Theory explicitly began with the work of J. Leray in 1945 [46]. The nomenclature “sheaf” over a space X, in terms of closed subsets of a topological space X, first appeared in 1946, also in one of Leray’s works, according to [21]. He was interested in solving partial differential equations and build up a strong tool to pass local properties to global ones. Currently, the definition of a sheaf over X is given by a “coherent family” of structures indexed on the lattice of open subsets of X or as étale maps (= local homeomorphisms) into X. Both arXiv:2008.10677v3 [math.CT] 9 Jul 2021 formulations emerged in the late 1940s and early 1950s in Cartan’s seminars and, in modern terms, they are intimately related by an equivalence of categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions and Remarks to the Langlands Program
    Questions and remarks to the Langlands program1 A. N. Parshin (Uspekhi Matem. Nauk, 67(2012), n 3, 115-146; Russian Mathematical Surveys, 67(2012), n 3, 509-539) Introduction ....................................... ......................1 Basic fields from the viewpoint of the scheme theory. .............7 Two-dimensional generalization of the Langlands correspondence . 10 Functorial properties of the Langlands correspondence. ................12 Relation with the geometric Drinfeld-Langlands correspondence . 16 Direct image conjecture . ...................20 A link with the Hasse-Weil conjecture . ................27 Appendix: zero-dimensional generalization of the Langlands correspondence . .................30 References......................................... .....................33 Introduction The goal of the Langlands program is a correspondence between representations of the Galois groups (and their generalizations or versions) and representations of reductive algebraic groups. The starting point for the construction is a field. Six types of the fields are considered: three types of local fields and three types of global fields [L3, F2]. The former ones are the following: 1) finite extensions of the field Qp of p-adic numbers, the field R of real numbers and the field C of complex numbers, arXiv:1307.1878v1 [math.NT] 7 Jul 2013 2) the fields Fq((t)) of Laurent power series, where Fq is the finite field of q elements, 3) the field of Laurent power series C((t)). The global fields are: 4) fields of algebraic numbers (= finite extensions of the field Q of rational numbers), 1I am grateful to R. P. Langlands for very useful conversations during his visit to the Steklov Mathematical institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, October 2011), to Michael Harris and Ulrich Stuhler, who answered my sometimes too naive questions, and to Ilhan˙ Ikeda˙ who has read a first version of the text and has made several remarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Mackey Theorem Amritanshu Prasad the Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India Article Info a B S T R a C T
    Expositiones Mathematicae 29 (2011) 110–118 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Expositiones Mathematicae journal homepage: www.elsevier.de/exmath An easy proof of the Stone–von Neumann–Mackey Theorem Amritanshu Prasad The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India article info a b s t r a c t Article history: The Stone–von Neumann–Mackey Theorem for Heisenberg groups Received 3 December 2009 associated to locally compact abelian groups is proved using the Accepted 15 June 2010 Peter–Weyl Theorem and the theory of Fourier transforms for Rn. A theorem of Pontryagin and van Kampen on the structure of locally 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: compact abelian groups (which is evident in any particular case) is 43-01 assumed. Keywords: ' 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Stone–von Neumann Mackey Heisenberg group Fourier transform Locally compact abelian group 1. Introduction The definition of a Heisenberg group, which is motivated by Heisenberg's commutation relations for position and momentum operators, goes back to Hermann Weyl's mathematical formulation of quantum kinematics [9]. The basic feature of Heisenberg groups, now known as the Stone–von Neumann Theorem, was proved for Heisenberg groups associated to real vector spaces by Marshall Stone [6] and John von Neumann [7]. George W. Mackey [3] extended this result to Heisenberg groups associated to all locally compact abelian groups, allowing for groups that arise in number theory with consequences that were first studied by André Weil [8]. Our proof of Mackey's version of the Stone–von Neumann Theorem uses relatively simple tools from functional analysis: the Peter–Weyl Theorem on representations of compact topological groups [2, Theorem 1.12], and the classical theory of Fourier transforms for real vector spaces, specifically, the Fourier Inversion Theorem and the Plancherel Theorem [5, Chap.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Sheaves and Cohomology
    2 Sheaves and Cohomology 2.1 Sheaves and Presheaves We fix a topological space X. Later we will include assumptions that are satisfied by smooth manifolds. 2.1.1 Definitions and Examples Definition 2.1. A presheaf of abelian groups F on X assigns to each open U ⊆ X an abelian group F (U) = Γ(U; F ) and for every inclusion of open sets V ⊆ U a homomorphism of abelian groups F ρUV : F (U) ! F (V ), often called the restriction map, satisfying F 1 [P1] ρUU = F(U) F F F [P2] for W ⊆ V ⊆ U, we have ρVW ◦ ρUV = ρUW . If F and G are two presheaves (of abelian groups) on X, then a morphism ' : F ! G consists of the data of a morphism 'U : F (U) ! G (U) for each open set U ⊆ X such that if V ⊆ U is an inclusion, then we have commutative diagrams 'U F (U) / G (U) F G ρUV ρUV (V ) / (V ): F 'V G Remark 2.2. We may form a category TopX whose objects are open sets in X and whose mor- phisms are simply inclusions of open sets. Then the above definition says that a presheaf is a ◦ contravariant functor TopX ! Ab, and that a morphism of presheaves is a natural transforma- tion of the associated functors. Definition 2.3. A sheaf F of abelian groups on X is a presheaf which, for any open set U ⊆ X and any open covering fUigi2I of U, satisfies the two additional properties: [S1] if s 2 F (U) is such that sjUi = 0 for all i 2 I, then s = 0; [S2] if si 2 F (Ui) such that sijUi\Uj = sjjUi\Uj for all i; j 2 I, then there exists s 2 F (U) such that sjUi = si for each i.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Geometry of Complex Vector Bundles
    DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY OF COMPLEX VECTOR BUNDLES by Shoshichi Kobayashi This is re-typesetting of the book first published as PUBLICATIONS OF THE MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN 15 DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY OF COMPLEX VECTOR BUNDLES by Shoshichi Kobayashi Kan^oMemorial Lectures 5 Iwanami Shoten, Publishers and Princeton University Press 1987 The present work was typeset by AMS-LATEX, the TEX macro systems of the American Mathematical Society. TEX is the trademark of the American Mathematical Society. ⃝c 2013 by the Mathematical Society of Japan. All rights reserved. The Mathematical Society of Japan retains the copyright of the present work. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copy- right owner. Dedicated to Professor Kentaro Yano It was some 35 years ago that I learned from him Bochner's method of proving vanishing theorems, which plays a central role in this book. Preface In order to construct good moduli spaces for vector bundles over algebraic curves, Mumford introduced the concept of a stable vector bundle. This concept has been generalized to vector bundles and, more generally, coherent sheaves over algebraic manifolds by Takemoto, Bogomolov and Gieseker. As the dif- ferential geometric counterpart to the stability, I introduced the concept of an Einstein{Hermitian vector bundle. The main purpose of this book is to lay a foundation for the theory of Einstein{Hermitian vector bundles. We shall not give a detailed introduction here in this preface since the table of contents is fairly self-explanatory and, furthermore, each chapter is headed by a brief introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Number Theory and Harmonic Analysis
    Number theory and harmonic analysis November 8, 2018 1 Adèles and idèles of algebraic numbers In this section, we will review the constriction of real and p-adic numbers from the set Q of rational numbers by the process of completion with respect to different valuations. Completions of Q and more generally of number fields give rise to local fields (of characteristic zero). Local fields, which may be the field of real or complex numbers, or p-adic fields, are endowed with locally compact topology. We will also review the groups of adèles and idèles, their topology, and their connection with basic theorems in algebraic number theory. Real numbers We will very briefly review the construction of real numbers from rational numbers. Recall that the field of rational numbers Q is a totally ordered field: we write x > y x y if Q+ where Q+ is the semigroup of positive rational numbers. It is also − 2 equipped with the real valuation function Q Q+ 0 ! [ f g x = sign(x)x j j x x x x that takes value or depending on whether Q+ or Q+, and 0 = 0. For we will also use p-adic− absolute values, we will write2 x −instead2 of xj andj call it the the real absolute value. The absolute value of thej differencej1 x yj j defines a j − j1 Q+-valued metric on Q. The field of real numbers R is constructed as the completion of Q with respect to this metric. A real number is thus defined to be an equivalence class of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers with respect to this distance.
    [Show full text]
  • Perverse Sheaves Learning Seminar: Derived Categories and Its Applications to Sheaves
    Perverse Sheaves Learning Seminar: Derived Categories and its Applications to Sheaves Yuguang (Roger) Bai October 6, 2018 1 Derived Categories Unless otherwise stated, let A be an abelian category. Denition 1.1. Let Ch(A ) be the category of chain complexes in A . Objects in this category are chain complexes A•, which is a sequence of objects and morphisms in A of the form i−1 i · · · −! Ai−1 d−! Ai −!d Ai+1 −! · · · satisfying di ◦ di−1 = 0 for every i 2 Z. A morphism • • between two complexes is a collection of morphisms i i i in f : A ! B f = (f : A ! B )i2Z such that i+1 i i i for every . A f ◦ dA = dB ◦ f i 2 Z Denition 1.2. A chain complex A• is said to be bounded above if there is an integer N such that Ai = 0 for all i > N. Similarly, A• is said to be bounded below if there is an integer N such that Ai = 0 for all i < N. A• is said to be bounded if it is bounded above and bounded below. Let Ch−(A ) (resp. Ch+(A ), Chb(A )) denote the full subcategory of Ch(A ) consisting of bounded- above (resp. bounded-below, bounded) complexes. Let Ch◦(A ) denote any of the four categories above. For a complex A•, let [1] : Ch(A ) ! Ch(A ) denote the shift functor where A[1]i = Ai−1. Denition 1.3. A quasi-isomorphism in Ch(A ) is a chain map f : A• ! B• such that the induced maps Hn(f): Hn(A) ! Hn(B) are isomorphisms for all n.
    [Show full text]
  • Category Theory Applied to Pontryagin Duality
    Pacific Journal of Mathematics CATEGORY THEORY APPLIED TO PONTRYAGIN DUALITY DAVID W. ROEDER Vol. 52, No. 2 February 1974 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 52, No. 2, 1974 CATEGORY THEORY APPLIED TO PONTRYAGIN DUALITY DAVID W. ROEDER A proof of the Pontryagin duality theorem for locally compact abelian (LCA) groups is given, using category-theo- retical ideas and homological methods. The proof is guided by the structure within the category of LCA groups and does not use any deep results except for the Peter-Weyl theorem. The duality is first established for the subcategory of ele- mentary LCA groups (those isomorphic with T* Θ ZJ 0 Rk φ F, where T is the circle group, Z the integers, R the real num- bers, and F a finite abelian group), and through the study of exact sequences, direct limits and projective limits the duality is expanded to larger subcategories until the full duality theorem is reached. Introduction* In this note we present a fairly economical proof of the Pontryagin duality theorem for locally compact abelian (LCA) groups, using category-theoretic ideas and homological methods. This theorem was first proved in a series of papers by Pontryagin and van Kampen, culminating in van Kampen's paper [5], with methods due primarily to Pontryagin. In [10, pp. 102-109], Weil introduced the simplifying notion of compactly generated group and explored the functorial nature of the situation by examining adjoint homomorphisms and projective limits. Proofs along the lines of Pontryagin-van Kampen-Weil appear in the books by Pontryagin [7, pp. 235-279] and Hewitt and Ross [2, pp.
    [Show full text]