An In-Depth Review of Enterprise Resource Planning ERP System Overview, Methodology & List of Software Options Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An In-Depth Review of Enterprise Resource Planning ERP System Overview, Methodology & List of Software Options Contents An In-Depth Review of Enterprise Resource Planning ERP System Overview, Methodology & List of Software Options Contents 1 Enterprise resource planning 1 1.1 Origin ................................................. 1 1.2 Expansion ............................................... 1 1.3 Characteristics ............................................. 2 1.4 Functional areas of ERP ........................................ 2 1.5 Components .............................................. 2 1.6 Best practices ............................................. 2 1.7 Connectivity to plant floor information ................................ 3 1.8 Implementation ............................................ 3 1.8.1 Process preparation ...................................... 3 1.8.2 Configuration ......................................... 3 1.8.3 Two tier enterprise resource planning ............................. 4 1.8.4 Customization ......................................... 4 1.8.5 Extensions ........................................... 5 1.8.6 Data migration ........................................ 5 1.9 Comparison to special–purpose applications ............................. 5 1.9.1 Advantages .......................................... 5 1.9.2 Benefits ............................................ 5 1.9.3 Disadvantages ......................................... 6 1.10 See also ................................................ 6 1.11 References ............................................... 6 1.12 Bibliography .............................................. 8 1.13 External links ............................................. 8 2 Enterprise planning system 9 2.1 Purposes ............................................... 9 2.1.1 Survival ............................................ 9 2.1.2 Competition .......................................... 9 2.1.3 Opportunities ......................................... 9 2.1.4 Vulnerabilities ......................................... 9 2.2 Strategic planning ........................................... 9 2.2.1 Strategy via analysis ..................................... 10 2.2.2 Strategy via geography .................................... 10 i ii CONTENTS 2.2.3 Strategy via projects integration ............................... 10 2.3 Planning and budgeting ........................................ 10 2.3.1 Classifications ......................................... 10 2.4 Group planning ............................................ 11 2.5 Transition plan ............................................ 11 2.6 Planning software ........................................... 11 2.7 See also ................................................ 11 2.8 References .............................................. 11 3 ERP system selection methodology 13 3.1 Overview ............................................... 13 3.2 Poor system selection ......................................... 13 3.3 A proper system selection methodology ............................... 14 3.4 References .............................................. 15 3.5 External links ............................................. 15 4 List of ERP software packages 16 4.1 Free and open-source ERP software ................................. 16 4.2 Proprietary ERP vendors and software ................................ 16 4.3 See also ................................................ 17 4.4 References ............................................... 17 5 Comparison of project management software 18 5.1 General information .......................................... 18 5.2 Features ................................................ 18 5.3 Monetary features ........................................... 18 5.4 See also ................................................ 18 5.5 References ............................................... 18 5.6 Text and image sources, contributors, and licenses .......................... 20 5.6.1 Text .............................................. 20 5.6.2 Images ............................................ 23 5.6.3 Content license ........................................ 23 Chapter 1 Enterprise resource planning of business functions. IT investments have become the largest category of capital expenditure in United States- based businesses over the past decade. Though early ERP systems focused on large enterprises, smaller enterprises increasingly use ERP systems.[3] The ERP system is considered a vital organizational tool because it integrates varied organizational systems and facilitates error-free transactions and production. How- ever, developing an ERP system differs from traditional system development.[4] ERP systems run on a variety of computer hardware and network configurations, typically using a database as an information repository.[5] Diagram showing some typical ERP modules 1.1 Origin Enterprise resource planning (ERP) is a category of The Gartner Group first used the acronym ERP in the business-management software—typically a suite of inte- 1990s,[6] where it was seen to extend the capabilities grated applications—that an organization can use to col- of material requirements planning (MRP), and the later lect, store, manage and interpret data from many business manufacturing resource planning (MRP II),[7][8] as well activities, including: as computer-integrated manufacturing. Without replac- ing these terms, ERP came to represent a larger whole • product planning, cost that reflected the evolution of application integration be- yond manufacturing.[9] • manufacturing or service delivery Not all ERP packages developed from a manufactur- • marketing and sales ing core; ERP vendors variously began assembling their packages with accounting, maintenance, and human- • inventory management resource components. By the mid-1990s ERP systems • shipping and payment addressed all core enterprise functions. Governments and non–profit organizations also began to use ERP systems.[10] ERP provides an integrated view of core business pro- cesses, often in real-time, using common databases maintained by a database management system. ERP systems track business resources—cash, raw materials, 1.2 Expansion production capacity—and the status of business com- mitments: orders, purchase orders, and payroll. The ERP systems experienced rapid growth in the 1990s. Be- applications that make up the system share data across cause of the year 2000 problem and introduction of the various departments (manufacturing, purchasing, sales, euro disrupted legacy systems, many companies took the accounting, etc.) that provide the data.[1] ERP facili- opportunity to replace their old systems with ERP.[11] tates information flow between all business functions, and [2] ERP systems initially focused on automating back of- manages connections to outside stakeholders. fice functions that did not directly affect customers and Enterprise system software is a multibillion-dollar in- the public. Front office functions, such as customer re- dustry that produces components that support a variety lationship management (CRM), dealt directly with cus- 1 2 CHAPTER 1. ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING tomers, or e-business systems such as e-commerce, e- • Management accounting: Budgeting, costing, cost government, e-telecom, and e-finance—or supplier re- management, activity based costing lationship management (SRM) became integrated later, • when the Internet simplified communicating with exter- Human resources: Recruiting, training, rostering, nal parties. payroll, benefits, 401K, diversity management, retirement, separation “ERP II” was coined in 2000 in an article by Gartner Pub- lications entitled ERP Is Dead—Long Live ERP II.[12] It • Manufacturing: Engineering, bill of materials, work describes web–based software that provides real–time ac- orders, scheduling, capacity, workflow manage- cess to ERP systems to employees and partners (such as ment, quality control, manufacturing process, man- suppliers and customers). The ERP II role expands tra- ufacturing projects, manufacturing flow, product life ditional ERP resource optimization and transaction pro- cycle management cessing. Rather than just manage buying, selling, etc.— • Order Processing: Order to cash, order entry, credit ERP II leverages information in the resources under its checking, pricing, available to promise, inventory, management to help the enterprise collaborate with other shipping, sales analysis and reporting, sales commis- enterprises.[13] ERP II is more flexible than the first gen- sioning. eration ERP. Rather than confine ERP system capabili- ties within the organization, it goes beyond the corporate • Supply chain management: Supply chain plan- walls to interact with other systems. Enterprise applica- ning, supplier scheduling, product configurator, tion suite is an alternate name for such systems. order to cash, purchasing, inventory, claim process- Developers now make more effort to integrate mobile de- ing, warehousing (receiving, putaway, picking and vices with the ERP system. ERP vendors are extend- packing). ing ERP to these devices, along with other business ap- • Project management: Project planning, resource plications. Technical stakes of modern ERP concern planning, project costing, work breakdown struc- integration—hardware, applications, networking, supply ture, billing, time and expense, performance units, chains. ERP now covers more functions and roles— activity management including decision making, stakeholders’ relationships, standardization, transparency, globalization, etc.[14] • Customer relationship management: Sales and mar- keting, commissions,
Recommended publications
  • NOTE: to Submit Assignment
    Submission guidelines • The due date for submission: October 24, Tuesday, 14:00. • This task should be prepared INDIVIDUALLY. In case of finding similar works, each student accused in cheating will get grade ZERO. • Please, select ONE topic for presentation from the list below. Topic Topic Presentation Title Presentation Title # # 01 Sage Live 16 Microsoft Dynamics GP 2016 R2 02 Sage Intacct 17 Microsoft Dynamics AX 2012 R3 03 Sage 50 Accounting 18 Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2017 04 Sage 300 ERP 19 Microsoft Dynamics SL 2015 05 Sage One 20 Microsoft Dynamics C5 2016 06 Epicor Financial Management 21 Info-Accountant 10 07 QuickBooks Premier (Contractor edition) 22 BEST-5 08 QuickBooks Premier (Nonprofit edition) 23 Galaktica-Parus 09 QuickBooks Premier (Retail edition) 24 Cougar Mountain DENALI QuickBooks Premier (Professional (Accountek) Connected 10 25 Services edition) Accounting & ERP QuickBooks Premier (Manufacturing 11 26 CCH Tagetik edition) 12 QuickBooks Online 27 UNIT4 Financials 13 QuickBooks Enterprise Solutions 2017 28 Dynac 14 Oracle Business Intelligence 11.1 29 AccuFund Accounting Suite 15 SAP Business One 9.2 30 SBS Financials • Items to be submitted: Microsoft PowerPoint file (.PPT or .PPTX) with your presentation. (minimum 20 slides, including TITLE slide, main part, and slide with references to sources of information used; presentation should contain information sections describing the topic, as well as graphical materials (e.g. pictures, charts, screenshots, etc.); name of file should start with your Student ID, and be followed by underscore symbol & presentation title, e.g. 20131550_ Sage Live.ppt) • All information must be in ENGLISH!!! • Completed PowerPoint presentation should be submitted to the location below from KIMEP University's Intranet.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Dynamics Erpis Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
    Microsoft Dynamics ERP is enterprise resource planning (ERP) software primarily geared toward midsize organizations as well as subsidiaries and divisions of larger organizations. Its applications are part of Microsoft Dynamics, a line of business management software owned and developed by Microsoft. Microsoft Dynamics ERP comprises four primary products: Microsoft Dynamics AX, Microsoft Dynamics GP, Microsoft Dynamics NAV, and Microsoft Dynamics SL. Products[edit] Microsoft Dynamics ERP includes five primary products: Microsoft Dynamics AX (formerly Axapta) is designed to help organizations do business across locations and countries by standardizing processes and helping to simplify compliance. The latest version is Microsoft Dynamics AX 2012. Microsoft Dynamics GP (formerly Great Plains Software) can help companies adapt to new opportunities and growth by managing changing markets, enabling unique business requirements, and connecting business processes across the organization. The latest version is Microsoft Dynamics GP 2010 (version 11.0). Microsoft Dynamics NAV (formerly Navision) is designed to help organizations streamline specialized and industry-specific business processes. The latest version is Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2013. Microsoft Dynamics SL (formerly Solomon IV) can help project-driven organizations obtain reports and business analysis and automate projects across company divisions and locations. The latest version is Microsoft Dynamics SL 7.0. Microsoft Dynamics C5 (formerly Concorde C5) can assist with finance, manufacturing, supply chains, analytics and electronic commerce for small and medium-sized enterprises. The latest version is Microsoft Dynamics C5 2010. Capabilities[edit] Microsoft Dynamics ERP applications are designed to help customers: Connect the entire supply chain. Make current financial data and reports accessible for business planning and regulatory compliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Lifecycle Management Tools Open Source
    Application Lifecycle Management Tools Open Source Posh and tropistic Christofer congees almost despondingly, though Sam humiliating his breastworks recoins. Jorge usually assassinates astringently or disrupt crustily when interterritorial Marko voids streakily and convivially. Irresponsible Vijay unround broadly. With the software changes into three core business reason for anyone using powerful lifecycle tools across public activity management The package includes OSS project management tool Redmine and version. This year open source ALM tuleap httpwwwenaleancomentuleap is altogether good start. ALM tools automate the software development and deployment processes help. Micro Focus Application Lifecycle Management ALM software and solutions. Virtual flavor of the product with its embedded and application software before. Greg Lindhorst Principal Program Manager Thursday January 14 2021. The more List and Open-source Tools View ahead complete list ANT Anypoint Platform. Application Lifecycle Management Tools ALM is the continuous process of. Top 10 Application Lifecycle Management Tools For end Year. A degree to two the limitations of save open-source circuit otherwise inadequate tool. Best Free Application Lifecycle Management Software 2021. Each document type main source code is managed with SubversionSVN with. It is free of tools are the advent of the use after year after going through it connects people meet business outcomes as and open application source tools? Application Lifecycle Management SoftLanding. Top Application Lifecycle Management ALM Toolsets InfoQ. They also have original single proponent of truth providing any relevant. Then view the software projects, open application lifecycle management tools on open source option, and hybrid it can create and. Software lifecycle management SLM is the discipline for managing.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of ERP As Service
    Implications of ERP as Service Gustaf Juell-Skielse1 and Håkan Enquist2 1 Stockholm University [email protected] 2 School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg [email protected] Abstract. In this paper we present implications for using and delivering Enterprise Resource Planning as services (ERP-as-a-service). The objective is to construct a framework of opportunities and challenges for users and suppliers of ERP-as-a-service. The framework is based on a combination of literature study and field study and includes approximately 80 implications. New implications, not found in literature, were identified in the field study. Examples of new implications include: more focus on IT-value; simplified phasing of implementation and improved supplier brand. For future research it is suggested that the framework is tested in a larger setting and that implications are prioritized for certain industries and types of business models. Keywords: ERP-as-a-service, Implication, Software-as-a-service, Enterprise resource planning, Service orientation, Cloud computing. Introduction Recently, service orientation has emerged as an important change driver in private and public sector organizations. Service orientation offers means to radically improve customer service, business processes and sourcing of information systems. Suppliers begin to offer information systems according to service based business models, such as Software as a Service and Cloud Computing, rather than standard application packages. Service based business models challenge conventional payment models, on-premise installations and monolithic designs of standard application packages and have vast implications for both users and suppliers of information systems. Through service based business models, suppliers can expand their potential customer base and offer more choices that enable customers to focus on core competencies and reduce initial investments in standard applications [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal & Logistics Technology in Market Realities
    Intermodal & Logistics Technology in market realities BESTFACT Conference Thomas Scherer [email protected] HP Enterprise Services CEE © Copyright 2013 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. HP i-Rail Initiative Solutions Focus Areas Passenger Energy Safety &Security Logistic Open Standards No Vendor Lockin IT Based Industry Technology Innovation High Quality Create an agile and efficient of business model for railways! • Technology enabled flexibility, increased speed and reduced costs • Based on Open Standards, open up new business models and remove current inhibitors & unleash power of innovation 2 © Copyright 2013 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. HP Focus Areas in Logistics • Transport management Solutions • Yard management and dispatching • Air freight management • Fleet management • Rail Cargo management • Electronic freight bill - Shipping • Sea Freight management document automation • Road Transport management • Freight Tracking and Security • Customer Centric Supply Chain • Analytic Rail and Port Information management System • Multimodal Terminal management • System 3 © Copyright 2013 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The new silk road 4 © Copyright 2013 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. BIG DATA and analytics External Information $ € ¥ CRM, SCM, ERP Transactional Data Core Transaction Systems + Mobile Audio Conversations Social Media Other Operational Systems Big Video Images Messages Sensors Data Analytical Environment Pre-defined reporting, Requiring filters for meaning (context, dashboards and analytics to: relevance, urgency) to: - Measure/monitor the business - Protect the business (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Software As a Service (Saas) Report 2020
    Software as a Service (SaaS) Report 2020 REDEYE - AI/MACHINE LEARNING 1 AGENDA 08:30 Introduction Redeye and summary of SaaS-report BLOCK 1 CRM/MARKETING 08:40 Younium 08:55 Lime 09:10 Agillic 09:25 Panel Q&A, Fredrik Nilsson and Johan Crona* BLOCK 2 ERP 09:40 24SevenOffice 09:55 Briox 10:10 Carasent 10:25 Panel Q&A, Mark Siöstedt and Johan Crona* BLOCK 3 RETAIL/E-COMMERCE 10:40 Bambuser 10:55 Litium 11:10 Vertiseit 11:25 ZetaDisplay 11:40 Panel Q&A, Forbes Goldman och Johan Crona* BLOCK 4 VARYING SAAS 11:55 Formpipe 12:10 BIMobject 12:25 Qbank 12:40 Irisity 12:55 Pexip 13:10 Panel Q&A, Fredrik Nilsson and Johan Crona* 13:30 Summary and thank you – Redeye *Johan Crona is the founder of Cloud Capital, a company specializing in financing SaaS companies in the size of SEK 10-50 million in sales. Cloud Capital was started to offer financing solutions so that SaaS entrepreneurs can retain more ownership in their company and avoid unnecessary dilution during a growth journey. He also runs a SaaS network with 700 members and since the summer of 2019 a SaaS podcast where he interviews entrepreneurs and experts in the sector. The video link to the SaaS-event: https://www.redeye.se/events/793615/redeye-software-as-a-service-saas-seminar-autumn-2020 REDEYE - SAAS REPORT 2020 2 SAAS REPORT 2020 Table of contents About Redeye 4 Redeye Technology Team 5 Transactions 8 Why invest in SaaS & the Cloud 10 The BIG one: The shift to the Cloud 11 Consumerization of IT 11 The rise of subscription economy 11 Investors and recurring revenue 11 Software Overview
    [Show full text]
  • Production Planning in Different Stages of a Manufacturing Supply Chain Under Multiple Uncertainties Goutham Ramaraj Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2017 Production planning in different stages of a manufacturing supply chain under multiple uncertainties Goutham Ramaraj Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Industrial Engineering Commons, and the Operational Research Commons Recommended Citation Ramaraj, Goutham, "Production planning in different stages of a manufacturing supply chain under multiple uncertainties" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 16108. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/16108 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Production planning in different stages of a manufacturing supply chain under multiple uncertainties by Goutham Ramaraj A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Industrial Engineering Program of Study Committee: Guiping Hu, Major Professor Lizhi Wang Stephen Vardeman The student author and the program of study committee are solely responsible for the content of this thesis. The Graduate College will ensure this thesis is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2017 Copyright © Goutham Ramaraj, 2017. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION To my family for their unconditional support. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................... v ABSTRACT………………………………. .............................................................. vi CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Relationship Management Software February 2019
    CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FEBRUARY 2019 Powered by Methodology CONTENTS 3 Introduction 5 Defining CRM Software 6 FrontRunners (Small Vendors) 8 FrontRunners (Enterprise Vendors) 10 Runners Up 24 Methodology Basics 2 INTRODUCTION his FrontRunners analysis graphic had a minimum qualifying Tis a data-driven assessment score of 4.01 for Usability and 4.11 identifying products in the Customer for User Recommended, while Relationship Management (CRM) the Small Vendor graphic had a software market that offer the minimum qualifying score of 4.31 best capability and value for small for Usability and 4.31 for User businesses. For a given market, Recommended. products are evaluated and given a score for Usability (x-axis) and To be considered for the CRM User Recommended (y-axis). FrontRunners, a product needed FrontRunners then plots 10-15 a minimum of 20 user reviews products each on a Small Vendor published within 18 months of the and an Enterprise Vendor graphic, evaluation period. Products needed based on vendor business size, per a minimum user rating score of category. 3.0 for both Usability and User Recommended in both the Small In the CRM FrontRunners and Enterprise graphics. infographic, the Enterprise Vendor 3 INTRODUCTION The minimum score cutoff to be included in the FrontRunners graphic varies by category, depending on the range of scores in each category. No product with a score less than 3.0 in either dimension is included in any FrontRunners graphic. For products included, the Usability and User Recommended scores determine their positions on the FrontRunners graphic. 4 DEFINING CRM SOFTWARE ustomer Relationship Software Advice’s FrontRunners CManagement (CRM) software is focused on the North American helps organizations manage CRM market.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Construction Workflow- the Role of Production Planning and Control
    Improving Construction Workflow- The Role of Production Planning and Control by Farook Ramiz Hamzeh MS (University of California at Berkeley) 2006 M Eng. (American University of Beirut) 2000 B Eng. (American University of Beirut) 1997 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering - Civil and Environmental Engineering in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Iris D. Tommelein (CEE), Chair Professor Glenn Ballard (CEE) Professor Phil Kaminsky (IEOR) Fall 2009 Improving Construction Workflow- The Role of Production Planning and Control Copyright 2009 by Farook Ramiz Hamzeh Abstract Improving Construction Workflow- The Role of Production Planning and Control by Farook Ramiz Hamzeh Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering - Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California, Berkeley Professor Iris D. Tommelein (CEE), Co-Chair, Professor Glenn Ballard (CEE), Co-Chair The Last PlannerTM System (LPS) has been implemented on construction projects to increase work flow reliability, a precondition for project performance against productivity and progress targets. The LPS encompasses four tiers of planning processes: master scheduling, phase scheduling, lookahead planning, and commitment / weekly work planning. This research highlights deficiencies in the current implementation of LPS including poor lookahead planning which results in poor linkage between weekly work plans and the master schedule. This poor linkage
    [Show full text]
  • Data Publication Consensus and Controversies [Version 3; Peer Review: 3 Approved]
    F1000Research 2014, 3:94 Last updated: 27 SEP 2021 REVIEW Data publication consensus and controversies [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] John Kratz, Carly Strasser California Digital Library, University of California Office of the President, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA v3 First published: 23 Apr 2014, 3:94 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3979.1 Second version: 16 May 2014, 3:94 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3979.2 Reviewer Status Latest published: 16 Oct 2014, 3:94 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3979.3 Invited Reviewers 1 2 3 Abstract The movement to bring datasets into the scholarly record as first class version 3 research products (validated, preserved, cited, and credited) has been (revision) report inching forward for some time, but now the pace is quickening. As 16 Oct 2014 data publication venues proliferate, significant debate continues over formats, processes, and terminology. Here, we present an overview of version 2 data publication initiatives underway and the current conversation, (revision) report report highlighting points of consensus and issues still in contention. Data 16 May 2014 publication implementations differ in a variety of factors, including the kind of documentation, the location of the documentation relative to version 1 the data, and how the data is validated. Publishers may present data 23 Apr 2014 report as supplemental material to a journal article, with a descriptive “data paper,” or independently. Complicating the situation, different initiatives and communities use the same terms to refer to distinct but 1. Mark Parsons, Research Data Alliance, Troy, overlapping concepts. For instance, the term published means that the NY, USA data is publicly available and citable to virtually everyone, but it may or may not imply that the data has been peer-reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Oprogramowanie Klasy Erp Dystrybuowane Na Zasadach Licencji Open Source
    OPROGRAMOWANIE KLASY ERP DYSTRYBUOWANE NA ZASADACH LICENCJI OPEN SOURCE Stanisław IWAN Streszczenie: Jedn ą z istotnych trudno ści, zwi ązanych z wykorzystywaniem technologii informacyjnych do wspomagania procesów zarz ądzania s ą wysokie koszty zwi ązane z opłatami licencyjnymi za oprogramowanie komputerowe. Mog ą one ulec znacznemu obni żeniu przy zastosowaniu alternatywnych metod dystrybuowania programów. W opracowaniu przedstawiono ogólne zało żenia licencji open source oraz wybrane przykłady systemów klasy ERP dystrybuowanych na jej zasadach. Słowa kluczowe: ERP, licencje oprogramowania, otwarte oprogramowanie, open source, technologie sieciowe. 1. Wprowadzenie Jedn ą z istotnych trudno ści, zwi ązanych z wykorzystywaniem technologii informacyjnych do wspomagania procesów zarz ądzania s ą wysokie koszty z tym zwi ązane. Cho ć znaczn ą ich cz ęść stanowi ą koszty zakupu i eksploatacji sprz ętu komputerowego, to jednak koszty zakupu licencji oprogramowania mog ą w wielu wypadkach (szczególnie w odniesieniu do mocno wyspecjalizowanych zada ń) stanowi ć element dominuj ący i niekiedy znacznie przewy ższa ć koszty sprz ętu. Dodatkowo firmy software’owe stosuj ą ró żne metody utrzymania klientów i zapewnienia sobie stałego dopływu opłat licencyjnych. Przykładem niechaj b ędą niektóre kontrowersyjne zapisy, zawarte w umowach licencyjnych jednego z producentów, mówi ące, że: − użytkownik nie jest wła ścicielem oprogramowania, które zakupił; − użytkownik nie mo że uruchamia ć wi ęcej ni ż jednej kopii systemu; − system operacyjny stanowi cz ęść zestawu oprogramowanie-komputer, nie mo że zatem by ć u żytkowany na komputerze innym, ni ż ten na którym został zainstalowany i zarejestrowany po raz pierwszy; − producent nie ponosi odpowiedzialno ści za straty, jakie poniesie u żytkownik w skutek u żytkowania systemu (pomimo wysokich opłat licencyjnych).
    [Show full text]
  • Developing an Enterprise Operating System for the Monitoring and Control of Enterprise Operations Joseph Youssef
    Developing an enterprise operating system for the monitoring and control of enterprise operations Joseph Youssef To cite this version: Joseph Youssef. Developing an enterprise operating system for the monitoring and control of enterprise operations. Other [cond-mat.other]. Université de Bordeaux, 2017. English. NNT : 2017BORD0761. tel-01760341 HAL Id: tel-01760341 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01760341 Submitted on 6 Apr 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE PRÉSENTÉE POUR OBTENIR LE GRADE DE DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX ECOLE DOCTORALE DES SCIENCES PHYSIQUES ET DE L’INGÉNIEUR SPECIALITE : PRODUCTIQUE Par Joseph YOUSSEF DEVELOPING AN ENTERPRISE OPERATING SYSTEM FOR THE MONITORING AND CONTROL OF ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS Sous la direction de : David CHEN (Co-directeur : Gregory ZACHAREWICZ) Soutenue le 21 Décembre 2017 Membres du jury : M. DUCQ, Yves Professeur, Université de Bordeaux Président M. KASSEL, Stephan Professeur, Université des Sciences Appliquées de Zwickau Rapporteur M. ARCHIMEDE, Bernard Professeur, Ecole Nationale D’Ingénieurs de Tarbes Rapporteur M. CHEN, David Professeur, Université de Bordeaux Directeur M. ZACHAREWICZ, Gregory MCF (H.D.R), Université de Bordeaux Co-directeur M. DACLIN, Nicolas Maître-Assistant, Ecole des Mines d’Alès Examinateur 2 Titre : Développement d’un Système D’exploitation des Entreprises pour le Suivi et le Contrôle des Opérations.
    [Show full text]