Analysis of Time Series of Solar-Like Oscillations – Applications to the Sun and HD 52265

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analysis of Time Series of Solar-Like Oscillations – Applications to the Sun and HD 52265 Analysis of time series of solar-like oscillations – Applications to the Sun and HD 52265 Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultäten der Georg-August-Universität zu Göttingen vorgelegt von Thorsten Stahn aus Göttingen Göttingen 2010 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. D7 Referent: Prof. Dr. Stefan Dreizler Korreferent: apl. Prof. Dr. Laurent Gizon Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 5.10. 2010 ISBN 978-3-942171-47-2 uni-edition GmbH 2011 http://www.uni-edition.de c Thorsten Stahn This work is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License Printed in Germany Summary The study of stellar oscillations allows one to constrain the structure and dynamics of stel- lar interiors to a precision that cannot be achieved with other methods. This dissertation focusses on the measurements of the parameters (frequencies, amplitudes, linewidths, and rotational splitting) of the global modes of solar-like oscillations observed in the Sun and in the Sun-like star HD 52265. The thesis is organized in three main parts: (i) an im- plementation and validation of a global fit of stellar oscillation power spectra using solar observations, (ii) an application of this method to original 4-month-long CoRoT observa- tions of the solar-like star HD 52265, and (iii) an extension of the fitting method to time series with gaps. My main results concern HD 52265: the mode frequencies of the radial, dipole and quadrupole modes are measured with the highest precision achieved so far for a solar-type star and, for the first time, I measure unambiguously the effect of rotation on oscillations in a solar-type star. Analysis of 14 years of disk-integrated solar observations with SoHO/VIRGO: This data set spans more than a full sunspot cycle. Based on the maximum likelihood method I perform global fits of the solar oscillation power spectra using 4 months of observations at a time. The global parametric model prescribes smooth variations of the parameters with radial order. I determine the parameters of solar p modes with degrees ` 2 ranging ≤ over 14 consecutive radial orders. The model parameters include rotation and the incli- nation angle of the rotation axis to the line of sight. By comparison with published mode frequencies, I find that my measurements are essentially unbiased and have errors that are consistent with expectations, hence validating my global fit for application to Sun-like stars other than the Sun. Analysis of 4 months of CoRoT observations of HD 52265: This star is particularly interesting as it is a Sun-like star and it hosts a planet. At the time of writing, the observa- tions of HD 52265 provide the best oscillation power spectrum which is currently avail- able for a distant solar-like star. In particular, the radial, dipole, and quadrupole modes of oscillation are well resolved over a range of 10 consecutive radial orders. The derived large and small separations, ∆ν = 98.84 0.12 µHz and δν = 8.14 0.20 µHz, provide ± ± strong constraints on the density, mass, and age of the star. For example, the precision on the mean stellar density is 0.4% and the precision on the mass is about 2%. Even though the azimuthal components of the non-radial modes of oscillation are not resolved there is direct evidence for rotational broadening of the peaks in the power spectrum, which allows to measure the stellar angular velocity Ω and the inclination angle i of the rotation axis. Combined with estimates of rotation derived from the modulation of the light curve by the passage of starspots, I find 2.1 Ω/Ω 2.5 and 27◦ i 55◦. Assuming ≤ ≤ ≤ ≤ III Summary the stellar rotation axis and the normal to the orbital plane of the companion are aligned, i = ip, the radial velocity measurement of Mp sin ip can be turned into a constraint on the mass of the companion: 1.3 M /M 2.4. This strongly suggests that HD 52265b is ≤ p Jup ≤ a planet and not a brown dwarf, while it also illustrates the connections between astero- seismology and exoplanet science. Fitting method for the analysis of gapped time series: I implement a new MLE method to determine the mode parameters of solar-like oscillations with higher precision and less bias compared to a standard fitting method. In the case of a 2 week observation of one single mode of solar-like oscillation with a signal-to-noise ratio / = 6, and using a S N typical single-site observation window (duty cycle of 30%), the frequency estimate of the new method is by a factor of two more precise than the estimate obtained with the old method. The analysis of ground-based observations of stellar oscillations should benefit from the application of the new fitting method. IV Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 General purpose of helio- and asteroseismology . .1 1.2 Observations of solar-like oscillations . .2 1.3 Basic properties of solar-like oscillations . .5 1.3.1 Other types of stellar oscillations . .7 1.4 Interpretation of stellar oscillation frequencies . .7 1.5 Maximum likelihood estimation of stellar oscillation parameters . .9 2 Implementation and validation of a global fit of stellar oscillation power spec- tra using solar observations 11 2.1 Solar observations with SoHO/VIRGO . 11 2.2 Parameterization of the global fit . 14 2.2.1 Fit of the solar background noise . 14 2.2.2 Mode frequencies and rotational splitting . 17 2.2.3 Mode linewidths . 19 2.2.4 Mode amplitudes and mode visibility . 21 2.2.5 Asteroseismic constraints on Ω and i ................ 21 2.3 Global fit of the VIRGO data . 22 2.3.1 Mode frequencies . 25 2.3.2 Mode linewidths . 32 2.3.3 Oscillation amplitudes . 34 2.3.4 Solar rotation and the inclination of the rotation axis . 38 2.4 Discussion: Is the global fit good enough for asteroseismology? . 43 3 Asteroseismic analysis of the solar-like star HD 52265 47 3.1 The solar-like star HD 52265 . 47 3.1.1 The planet HD 52265b . 50 3.2 Observation of HD 52265 with CoRoT . 51 3.3 The power spectrum of HD 52265 . 51 3.3.1 Echelle spectrum . 55 3.3.2 Power at low frequencies: signature of stellar rotation . 56 3.4 Determination of the stellar background noise . 57 3.5 Modifications to the parameterization of the oscillation power spectrum . 58 3.6 Extraction of p-mode parameters and estimation of errors . 59 3.7 Global fit of the p-mode oscillation spectrum . 60 3.7.1 Mode frequencies . 60 V Contents 3.7.2 Mode linewidths . 70 3.7.3 Oscillation amplitudes . 76 3.7.4 Stellar rotation and the inclination of the rotation axis . 79 3.7.5 Fit A or Fit B: Which fit is better? . 88 4 Fourier analysis of gapped time series: maximum likelihood estimation 89 4.1 Introduction . 89 4.2 Statement of the problem . 90 4.2.1 The observed signal in Fourier space . 90 4.2.2 Statistics of the unconvolved signal . 92 4.3 Joint PDF of the complex Fourier spectrum . 93 4.4 Maximum likelihood estimation of stellar oscillation parameters . 95 4.4.1 Solar-like oscillations . 95 4.4.2 Deterministic oscillations plus white noise . 95 4.5 The old way: fitting the power spectrum and ignoring the correlations . 96 4.5.1 Solar-like oscillations . 97 4.5.2 Deterministic oscillations plus white noise . 97 4.6 Simulation of artificial time series . 97 4.6.1 Synthetic Window Functions . 98 4.6.2 Solar-like oscillations . 99 4.6.3 Deterministic sinusoidal oscillations plus white noise . 100 4.7 Testing and comparing the fitting methods for solar-like oscillations . 100 4.7.1 Window function with a 30% duty cycle . 100 4.7.2 Different window functions . 105 4.7.3 Cramér–Rao lower bounds . 108 4.7.4 Different signal-to-noise ratios . 109 4.7.5 Different mode lifetimes . 116 4.7.6 Impact of the initial guess . 122 4.8 Testing and comparing the methods for sinusoidal deterministic oscilla- tions plus white noise . 124 4.9 Conclusion . 127 5 Efficient maximization of the joint PDF: Cholesky decomposition 129 5.1 The Cholesky decomposition . 129 5.2 Testing the Cholesky decomposition . 130 6 Discussion 135 6.1 HD 52265: A remarkable data set for asteroseismology . 135 6.2 On the determination of global stellar parameters of HD 52265 . 135 6.3 Asteroseismic constraint on the mass of the exoplanet HD 52265b . 140 6.4 Other implications for the characterization of exoplanetary systems . 140 6.5 On ground-based observations for asteroseismology . 143 Bibliography 145 VI List of Figures 1.1 Disk-integrated observation of solar acoustic oscillations . .4 1.2 Asteroseismic Hertzsprung-Russell diagram . .8 2.1 Fourteen years of Sun-as-a-star data obtained with SoHO/VIRGO . 12 2.2 Oscillation power spectrum of a 120 day VIRGO time series . 13 2.3 Echelle spectrum of a 120 day VIRGO time series . 13 2.4 Fit of the background noise of a 120 day VIRGO time series . 15 2.5 Parameterization of solar p-mode frequencies (` = 0, 1) . 18 2.6 Parameterization of solar p-mode frequencies (` = 2) . 19 2.7 Parameterization of solar mode linewidths . 20 2.8 Global fit of the solar oscillation power spectrum I . 23 2.9 Global fit of the solar oscillation power spectrum II. 24 2.10 Distribution of the initial guesses and the fits of the frequency parameters 26 2.11 Solar-cycle variation of the mode frequencies .
Recommended publications
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2105.11583V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 2 Jul 2021 Keck-HIRES, APF-Levy, and Lick-Hamilton Spectrographs
    Draft version July 6, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The California Legacy Survey I. A Catalog of 178 Planets from Precision Radial Velocity Monitoring of 719 Nearby Stars over Three Decades Lee J. Rosenthal,1 Benjamin J. Fulton,1, 2 Lea A. Hirsch,3 Howard T. Isaacson,4 Andrew W. Howard,1 Cayla M. Dedrick,5, 6 Ilya A. Sherstyuk,1 Sarah C. Blunt,1, 7 Erik A. Petigura,8 Heather A. Knutson,9 Aida Behmard,9, 7 Ashley Chontos,10, 7 Justin R. Crepp,11 Ian J. M. Crossfield,12 Paul A. Dalba,13, 14 Debra A. Fischer,15 Gregory W. Henry,16 Stephen R. Kane,13 Molly Kosiarek,17, 7 Geoffrey W. Marcy,1, 7 Ryan A. Rubenzahl,1, 7 Lauren M. Weiss,10 and Jason T. Wright18, 19, 20 1Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2IPAC-NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 4Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 5Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 6Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA 7NSF Graduate Research Fellow 8Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 9Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 10Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai`i,
    [Show full text]
  • IAU Division C Working Group on Star Names 2019 Annual Report
    IAU Division C Working Group on Star Names 2019 Annual Report Eric Mamajek (chair, USA) WG Members: Juan Antonio Belmote Avilés (Spain), Sze-leung Cheung (Thailand), Beatriz García (Argentina), Steven Gullberg (USA), Duane Hamacher (Australia), Susanne M. Hoffmann (Germany), Alejandro López (Argentina), Javier Mejuto (Honduras), Thierry Montmerle (France), Jay Pasachoff (USA), Ian Ridpath (UK), Clive Ruggles (UK), B.S. Shylaja (India), Robert van Gent (Netherlands), Hitoshi Yamaoka (Japan) WG Associates: Danielle Adams (USA), Yunli Shi (China), Doris Vickers (Austria) WGSN Website: https://www.iau.org/science/scientific_bodies/working_groups/280/ ​ WGSN Email: [email protected] ​ The Working Group on Star Names (WGSN) consists of an international group of astronomers with expertise in stellar astronomy, astronomical history, and cultural astronomy who research and catalog proper names for stars for use by the international astronomical community, and also to aid the recognition and preservation of intangible astronomical heritage. The Terms of Reference and membership for WG Star Names (WGSN) are provided at the IAU website: https://www.iau.org/science/scientific_bodies/working_groups/280/. ​ ​ ​ WGSN was re-proposed to Division C and was approved in April 2019 as a functional WG whose scope extends beyond the normal 3-year cycle of IAU working groups. The WGSN was specifically called out on p. 22 of IAU Strategic Plan 2020-2030: “The IAU serves as the ​ internationally recognised authority for assigning designations to celestial bodies and their surface features. To do so, the IAU has a number of Working Groups on various topics, most notably on the nomenclature of small bodies in the Solar System and planetary systems under Division F and on Star Names under Division C.” WGSN continues its long term activity of researching cultural astronomy literature for star names, and researching etymologies with the goal of adding this information to the WGSN’s online materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Mètodes De Detecció I Anàlisi D'exoplanetes
    MÈTODES DE DETECCIÓ I ANÀLISI D’EXOPLANETES Rubén Soussé Villa 2n de Batxillerat Tutora: Dolors Romero IES XXV Olimpíada 13/1/2011 Mètodes de detecció i anàlisi d’exoplanetes . Índex - Introducció ............................................................................................. 5 [ Marc Teòric ] 1. L’Univers ............................................................................................... 6 1.1 Les estrelles .................................................................................. 6 1.1.1 Vida de les estrelles .............................................................. 7 1.1.2 Classes espectrals .................................................................9 1.1.3 Magnitud ........................................................................... 9 1.2 Sistemes planetaris: El Sistema Solar .............................................. 10 1.2.1 Formació ......................................................................... 11 1.2.2 Planetes .......................................................................... 13 2. Planetes extrasolars ............................................................................ 19 2.1 Denominació .............................................................................. 19 2.2 Història dels exoplanetes .............................................................. 20 2.3 Mètodes per detectar-los i saber-ne les característiques ..................... 26 2.3.1 Oscil·lació Doppler ........................................................... 27 2.3.2 Trànsits
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of the XUV Radiation Onto Close Planets and Their Evaporation⋆
    A&A 532, A6 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116594 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics Estimation of the XUV radiation onto close planets and their evaporation J. Sanz-Forcada1, G. Micela2,I.Ribas3,A.M.T.Pollock4, C. Eiroa5, A. Velasco1,6,E.Solano1,6, and D. García-Álvarez7,8 1 Departamento de Astrofísica, Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), ESAC Campus, PO Box 78, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 2 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo G. S. Vaiana, Piazza del Parlamento, 1, 90134, Palermo, Italy 3 Institut de Ciènces de l’Espai (CSIC-IEEC), Campus UAB, Fac. de Ciències, Torre C5-parell-2a planta, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain 4 XMM-Newton SOC, European Space Agency, ESAC, Apartado 78, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain 5 Dpto. de Física Teórica, C-XI, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain 6 Spanish Virtual Observatory, Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), ESAC Campus, Madrid, Spain 7 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, 38205 La Laguna, Spain 8 Grantecan CALP, 38712 Breña Baja, La Palma, Spain Received 27 January 2011 / Accepted 1 May 2011 ABSTRACT Context. The current distribution of planet mass vs. incident stellar X-ray flux supports the idea that photoevaporation of the atmo- sphere may take place in close-in planets. Integrated effects have to be accounted for. A proper calculation of the mass loss rate through photoevaporation requires the estimation of the total irradiation from the whole XUV (X-rays and extreme ultraviolet, EUV) range. Aims. The purpose of this paper is to extend the analysis of the photoevaporation in planetary atmospheres from the accessible X-rays to the mostly unobserved EUV range by using the coronal models of stars to calculate the EUV contribution to the stellar spectra.
    [Show full text]
  • • August the 26Th 2004 Detection of the Radial-Velocity Signal Induced by OGLE-TR-111 B Using UVES/FLAMES on the VLT (See Pont Et Al
    2004 • August the 26th 2004 Detection of the radial-velocity signal induced by OGLE-TR-111 b using UVES/FLAMES on the VLT (see Pont et al. 2004, A&A in press, astro-ph/0408499). • August the 25th 2004 TrES-1b: A new transiting exoplanet detected by the Trans-Atlantic Exoplanet Survey (TreS) team . (see Boulder Press release or Alonso et al.) • August the 25th 2004 HD 160691 c : A 14 Earth-mass planet detected with HARPS (see ESO Press Release or Santos et al.) • July the 8th 2004 HD 37605 b: The first extra-solar planet detected with HRS on the Hobby- Eberly Telescope (Cochran et al.) • May the 3rd 2004 HD 219452 Bb withdrawn by Desidera et al. • April the 28th 2004 Orbital solution for OGLE-TR-113 confirmed by Konacki et al • April the 15th 2004 OGLE 2003-BLG-235/MOA 2003-BLG-53: a planetary microlensing event (Bond et al.) • April the 14th 2004 FLAMES-UVES spectroscopic orbits for two OGLE III transiting candidates: OGLE-TR-113 and OGLE-TR-132 (Bouchy et al.) • February 2004 Detection of Carbon and Oxygen in the evaporating atmosphere of HD 209458 b by A. Vidal-Madjar et al. (from HST observations). • January the 5th 2004 Two planets orbiting giant stars announced by Mitchell et al. during the AAS meeting: HD 59686 b and 91 Aqr b (HD 219499 b). Two other more massive companions, Tau Gem b (HD 54719 b) and nu Oph b (HD 163917 b), have also been announced by the same authors. 2003 • December 2003 First planet detected with HARPS: HD 330075 b (see Mayor et al., in the ESO Messenger No 114) • July the 3rd 2003 A long-period planet on a circular orbit around HD 70642 announced by the AAT team (Carter et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctor of Philosophy
    Study of Sun-like G Stars and Their Exoplanets Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Mr. SHASHANKA R. GURUMATH May, 2019 ABSTRACT By employing exoplanetary physical and orbital characteristics, aim of this study is to understand the genesis, dynamics, chemical abundance and magnetic field structure of Sun-like G stars and relationship with their planets. With reasonable constraints on selection of exoplanetary physical characteristics, and by making corrections for stellar rate of mass loss, a power law relationship between initial stellar mass and their exo- planetary mass is obtained that suggests massive stars harbor massive planets. Such a power law relationship is exploited to estimate the initial mass (1.060±0.006) M of the Sun for possible solution of “Faint young Sun paradox” which indeed indicates slightly higher mass compared to present mass. Another unsolved puzzle of solar system is angular momentum problem, viz., compare to Sun most of the angular momentum is concentrated in the solar system planets. By analyzing the exoplanetary data, this study shows that orbital angular momentum of Solar system planets is higher compared to orbital angular momentum of exoplanets. This study also supports the results of Nice and Grand Tack models that propose the idea of outward migration of Jovian planets during early history of Solar system formation. Furthermore, we have examined the influence of stellar metallicity on the host stars mass and exoplanetary physical and orbital characteristics that shows a non-linear relationship. Another important result is most of the planets in single planetary stellar systems are captured from the space and/or inward migration of planets might have played a dominant role in the final architecture of single planetary stellar systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantization of Planetary Systems and Its Dependency on Stellar Rotation Jean-Paul A
    Quantization of Planetary Systems and its Dependency on Stellar Rotation Jean-Paul A. Zoghbi∗ ABSTRACT With the discovery of now more than 500 exoplanets, we present a statistical analysis of the planetary orbital periods and their relationship to the rotation periods of their parent stars. We test whether the structure of planetary orbits, i.e. planetary angular momentum and orbital periods are ‘quantized’ in integer or half-integer multiples with respect to the parent stars’ rotation period. The Solar System is first shown to exhibit quantized planetary orbits that correlate with the Sun’s rotation period. The analysis is then expanded over 443 exoplanets to statistically validate this quantization and its association with stellar rotation. The results imply that the exoplanetary orbital periods are highly correlated with the parent star’s rotation periods and follow a discrete half-integer relationship with orbital ranks n=0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, etc. The probability of obtaining these results by pure chance is p<0.024. We discuss various mechanisms that could justify this planetary quantization, such as the hybrid gravitational instability models of planet formation, along with possible physical mechanisms such as inner discs magnetospheric truncation, tidal dissipation, and resonance trapping. In conclusion, we statistically demonstrate that a quantized orbital structure should emerge naturally from the formation processes of planetary systems and that this orbital quantization is highly dependent on the parent stars rotation periods. Key words: planetary systems: formation – star: rotation – solar system: formation 1. INTRODUCTION The discovery of now more than 500 exoplanets has provided the opportunity to study the various properties of planetary systems and has considerably advanced our understanding of planetary formation processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ricky Leon Murphy Project
    Ricky Leon Murphy The Appendices: Project – HET606 Appendix 1 – Known Exoplanets Semester 2 – 2004 Appendix 2 – Location of Tau Bootis Appendix 3 – Location of HD 209458 Appendix 4 – Image Reduction Search for Other Worlds Introduction As of September 2004, there are 136 known planets outside our solar system (http://exoplanets.org). These extra-solar planets, or exoplanets, are one of the most current and highly studied subjects in Astronomy today and it is one of the very few subjects that involve both amateur and professional astronomers. The huge telescopes perched atop Mauna Kea in Hawaii are pointed at these objects, as are 8” telescopes purchased from the local shopping mall – and many others around the world. Why are we finding these planets now if only 8” telescopes can detect them? Simple; we know what we are looking for and we have better tools to get the job done. While telescope size does not seem to matter with the search and study of exoplanets, it’s what you do not hear about that really matters: improved sensitivity in CCD cameras, improved resolution in spectroscopy, and fast computers to perform the mathematics. The goal of gathering repeatable data is very important when studying exoplanets. The rewards of such study carry implications across the board in Astronomy: we can learn about our own solar system and test the theories of solar system formation and evolution, improve the sensitivity to detect small Earth-like planets, and possibly provide targets for the spaced based telescopes and SETI projects; however, the most important implication is that perhaps for the first time in history, amateurs and professionals from around the world are engaged in this subject and working together to share the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Enhanced Chromospheric Ca II H and K Emission in Stars with Close-In Extrasolar Planets
    A&A 540, A82 (2012) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118247 & c ESO 2012 Astrophysics Evidence for enhanced chromospheric Ca II H and K emission in stars with close-in extrasolar planets T. Krejcovᡠ1 and J. Budaj2 1 Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Masaryk University, Kotlárskᡠ2, 61137 Brno, Czech Republic e-mail: [email protected] 2 Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 05960 Tatranská Lomnica, Slovak Republic e-mail: [email protected] Received 11 October 2011 / Accepted 13 February 2012 ABSTRACT Context. The planet-star interaction is manifested in many ways. It has been found that a close-in exoplanet causes small but mea- surable variability in the cores of a few lines in the spectra of several stars, which corresponds to the orbital period of the exoplanet. Stars with and without exoplanets may have different properties. Aims. The main goal of our study is to search for the influence that exoplanets might have on atmospheres of their host stars. Unlike the previous studies, we do not study changes in the spectrum of a host star or differences between stars with and without exoplanets. We aim to study a large number of stars with exoplanets and the current level of their chromospheric activity and to look for a possible correlation with the exoplanetary properties. Methods. To analyse the chromospheric activity of stars, we exploited our own and publicly available archival spectra, measured the equivalent widths of the cores of Ca II H and K lines, and used them to trace their activity. Subsequently, we searched for their dependence on the orbital parameters and the mass of the exoplanet.
    [Show full text]
  • IAU WGSN 2019 Annual Report
    IAU Division C Working Group on Star Names 2019 Annual Report Eric Mamajek (chair, USA) WG Members: Juan Antonio Belmote Avilés (Spain), Sze-leung Cheung (Thailand), Beatriz García (Argentina), Steven Gullberg (USA), Duane Hamacher (Australia), Susanne M. Hoffmann (Germany), Alejandro López (Argentina), Javier Mejuto (Honduras), Thierry Montmerle (France), Jay Pasachoff (USA), Ian Ridpath (UK), Clive Ruggles (UK), B.S. Shylaja (India), Robert van Gent (Netherlands), Hitoshi Yamaoka (Japan) WG Associates: Danielle Adams (USA), Yunli Shi (China), Doris Vickers (Austria) WGSN Website: https://www.iau.org/science/scientific_bodies/working_groups/280/ WGSN Email: [email protected] The Working Group on Star Names (WGSN) consists of an international group of astronomers with expertise in stellar astronomy, astronomical history, and cultural astronomy who research and catalog proper names for stars for use by the international astronomical community, and also to aid the recognition and preservation of intangible astronomical heritage. The Terms of Reference and membership for WG Star Names (WGSN) are provided at the IAU website: https://www.iau.org/science/scientific_bodies/working_groups/280/. WGSN was re-proposed to Division C and was approved in April 2019 as a functional WG whose scope extends beyond the normal 3-year cycle of IAU working groups. The WGSN was specifically called out on p. 22 of IAU Strategic Plan 2020-2030: “The IAU serves as the internationally recognised authority for assigning designations to celestial bodies and their surface features. To do so, the IAU has a number of Working Groups on various topics, most notably on the nomenclature of small bodies in the Solar System and planetary systems under Division F and on Star Names under Division C.” WGSN continues its long term activity of researching cultural astronomy literature for star names, and researching etymologies with the goal of adding this information to the WGSN’s online materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival of Exomoons Around Exoplanets 2
    Survival of exomoons around exoplanets V. Dobos1,2,3, S. Charnoz4,A.Pal´ 2, A. Roque-Bernard4 and Gy. M. Szabo´ 3,5 1 Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, 9747 AD, Landleven 12, Groningen, The Netherlands 2 Konkoly Thege Mikl´os Astronomical Institute, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, E¨otv¨os Lor´and Research Network (ELKH), 1121, Konkoly Thege Mikl´os ´ut 15-17, Budapest, Hungary 3 MTA-ELTE Exoplanet Research Group, 9700, Szent Imre h. u. 112, Szombathely, Hungary 4 Universit´ede Paris, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France 5 ELTE E¨otv¨os Lor´and University, Gothard Astrophysical Observatory, Szombathely, Szent Imre h. u. 112, Hungary E-mail: [email protected] January 2020 Abstract. Despite numerous attempts, no exomoon has firmly been confirmed to date. New missions like CHEOPS aim to characterize previously detected exoplanets, and potentially to discover exomoons. In order to optimize search strategies, we need to determine those planets which are the most likely to host moons. We investigate the tidal evolution of hypothetical moon orbits in systems consisting of a star, one planet and one test moon. We study a few specific cases with ten billion years integration time where the evolution of moon orbits follows one of these three scenarios: (1) “locking”, in which the moon has a stable orbit on a long time scale (& 109 years); (2) “escape scenario” where the moon leaves the planet’s gravitational domain; and (3) “disruption scenario”, in which the moon migrates inwards until it reaches the Roche lobe and becomes disrupted by strong tidal forces.
    [Show full text]