DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of the European Union's Co-Operation with Kenya

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of the European Union's Co-Operation with Kenya Evaluation of the European Union’s Co-operation with Kenya Final Report Volume 2, Annexes June 2014 Evaluation carried out on behalf of the European Commission Development and Cooperation EuropeAid Lead company Merzhauser Str. 183 Implementing D-79100 Freiburg company Consortium composed by DRN, ECDPM, Ecorys, Particip Leader of the Consortium: Particip Contract No EVA 2012/304196 This evaluation was commissioned by the Evaluation Unit of the Directorate General for Development and Cooperation – EuropeAid (European Commission) The opinions expressed in this document represent the authors’ points of view which are not necessarily shared by the European Commission or by the authorities of the concerned countries. This report has been prepared by: ECORYS Nederland B.V. Watermanweg 44 3067 GG Rotterdam P.O. Box 4175 3006 AD Rotterdam The Netherlands T +31 (0)10 453 88 00 F +31 (0)10 453 07 38 E [email protected] Registration no. 24316726 W: www.ecorys.nl Evaluation team: Anneke Slob Team leader, monitoring and evaluation specialist Martin van der Linde Deputy team leader, budget support and PFM expert Jens Larsen Transport sector expert Rudy Ooijen Agricultural and rural development expert Karuti Kanyinga Governance expert Lydeke Schakel Non state actors expert Rotterdam, June 2014 The evaluation was managed by the DEVCO Evaluation Unit. The authors accept sole responsibility for this report, drawn up on behalf of the Commission of the European Union. The report does not necessarily reflect the views of the Commission. Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures 4 Annex 1 Terms of Reference 7 Annex 2 List of people interviewed 31 Annex 3 Document list 39 Annex 4 Methodology 49 Annex 5 Portfolio analysis 53 Annex 6 EQ1: Responsiveness 71 Annex 7 EQ2: Donor coordination and harmonisation 97 Annex 8 EQ 3: Results focus 107 Annex 9 EQ4: General budget support strategy 117 Annex 10 EQ5: PFM reforms 135 Annex 11 EQ6: Agricultural and Food Security Improvements 151 Annex 13 EQ8: Transport sector improvements 175 Annex 14 EQ9: Economic transport improvements 197 Annex 15 Governance improvements 215 Annex 16 Overview of analysis of JAORs, ROM and evaluation reports 227 Annex 17 Kenyan context 241 3 List of Tables and Figures Tables Table A.4.1 Phasing of the evaluation 49 Table A.5.1 Sector/topic categories 55 Table A.5.2 Shares sub-sectors/activity groups Transport sector 57 Table A.5.3 Capacity building: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 57 Table A.5.4 Construct/upgrade Northern Corridor and road to Ethiopia: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 58 Table A.5.5 Upgrade rural roads: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 58 Table A.5.6 Upgrade tourist roads: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 59 Table A.5.7 Upgrade road network Nairobi: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 59 Table A.5.8 ASAL research: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 60 Table A.5.9 Drought management: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 61 Table A.5.10 Food Security: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 61 Table A.5.11 Community development: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €)62 Table A.5.12 Capacity building: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 62 Table A.5.13 Environmental management and biodiversity: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 63 Table A.5.14 Specific crop and livestock support. planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 64 Table A.5.15 Planned and disbursed GBS amounts (in €) 65 Table A.5.16 Local governance: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 66 Table A.5.17 NSA democratic governance: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 67 Table A.5.18 Electoral capacity building & observation: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 67 Table A.5.19 Human rights: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 68 Table A.5.20 NSA community development: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 69 Table A.5.21 Assistance to access to law & justice reforms: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 69 Table A.5.22 Other governance support activities: planned and paid amounts per decision (in €) 70 Table A.8.1 ROM coverage per sector 111 Table A.8.2 Evaluation coverage per sector 112 Table A.13.1 Funding of the Roads Sector (Kshs. Billion) 188 Table A.13.2 Rehabilitation share of maintenance works for trunk roads (Road classes A, B and C) (Kshs. Billion) 189 Table A.13.3 Road Condition for different road categories (in %) 191 Table A.13.4 Development in Road Condition of the Northern Corridor 192 4 Table A.14.1 Overview of trunk road planning issues from ROM reports1) 2) 198 Table A.14.2 Expected or actual delays in starting and technical completion of trunk road projects 199 Table A.14.3 Travel Times by Truck on main road sections 204 Table A.14.4 Composition of total transport costs for moving a 20 feet container by truck on selected routes for foreign trade related transports (%) 206 Table A.14.5 Calculated reduction of total transport costs at selected tours due to the three EU projects on NC 208 Table A.14.6 Estimates of Import and Export Tonnages (1000 Tons) in 2007 211 Table A.17.1 Main Economic Indicators Kenya 241 Figures Figure A.4.1 Data collection and analysis process 52 Figure A.5.1 Percentage funds planned and paid per cycle of EDF as share of total planned and paid EFD funds over the period 2006-2012 54 Figure A.5.2 Percentage of total amount paid by sector 56 Figure A.5.3 Breakdown of the other sectors’ category 56 Figure A.5.4 Percentage of total amount paid by sub-sector/activity group Agriculture/Rural development sector 60 Figure A.5. 5 Percentage of total amount paid by sub-sector/activity group Governance sector 66 5 Annex 1 Terms of Reference 7 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Development and Cooperation — EuropeAid Quality and Impact - Evaluation Evaluation of the European Union's co-operation with Kenya Country Level Evaluation Commission européenne, B-1049 Bruxelles / Europese Commissie, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium. Telephone: (32-2) 299 11 11. Office: L-41 03/83. Telephone: direct line (32-2) 2962939. Fax: (32-2) 2992912. Table for contents 1 MANDATE AND OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................ 3 2 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Country context....................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Overview of European Union's Cooperation with Kenya........................................................ 4 3 SCOPE .............................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Temporal and legal scope........................................................................................................ 8 3.2 Thematic scope........................................................................................................................ 9 4 METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH ................................................................................................... 9 4.1 The desk phase...................................................................................................................... 10 4.2 Field Phase (country mission)................................................................................................ 12 4.3 Synthesis phase ..................................................................................................................... 12 4.3.1 The Draft Final Report ................................................................................................... 12 4.3.2 The in-country seminar ................................................................................................. 13 4.3.3 The Final Report ............................................................................................................ 13 5 RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND THE MONITORING OF THE EVALUATION........... 13 6 THE EVALUATION TEAM................................................................................................................ 13 7 TIMING .......................................................................................................................................... 14 8 OFFER FOR THE EVALUATION........................................................................................................ 14 ANNEXES.................................................................................................................................... 15 ANNEX 1: INDICATIVE DOCUMENTATION TO BE CONSULTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION BY THE SELECTED FRAMEWORK CONTRACTOR.............................. 15 ANNEX 2: OVERALL STRUCTURE OF THE FINAL REPORT............................................... 16 ANNEX 3 - QUALITY ASSESSMENT GRID .......................................................................... 18 ANNEX 4 – TIMING TO BE FILLED-IN................................................................................ 19 ANNEX 5: EVALUATION CRITERIA AND KEY ISSUES ....................................................... 20 ANNEX 6: NOTE ON THE CRITERION OF COHERENCE AND ON THE 3CS .................... 21 ANNEX 7: PRINCIPLES REGARDING THE DRAFTING OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS ... 22 10 1 MANDATE AND OBJECTIVES Systematic and timely evaluation of its programmes is a priority of the European Commission (further referred
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gender Ranking Rapid Baseline Survey on the Status of Gender Equality in Kenyan Political Parties
    GENDER RANKING RAPID BASELINE SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF GENDER EQUALITY IN KENYAN POLITICAL PARTIES (ZERO DRAFT) © APRIL 2014 1 | P a g e Table of Contents 1 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 4 2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Why Gender Ranking of Political Parties? .................................................................. 7 3 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 7 4 BARRIERS TO WOMEN’S POLITICAL PARTICIPATION ........................................................ 17 4.1 The Situation of Women in Politics ............................................................................. 17 4.2 Evaluations on the Internal and External Barriers to Women’s Political Participation ............................................................................................................................ 18 5 METHODOLGY ...................................................................................................................... 19 5.1 Survey Design ............................................................................................................... 19 5.2 Limitations of the Survey ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vnr Report for Kenya.Pdf
    qwertylzxcvbnmrtyuiopasdfghjkl zxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvb nmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwIMPLEMEMENTATION OF THE AGENDA 2030 ertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerFOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA t June, 2017 yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopa sdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj klzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklz xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv bnmrtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqw ertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopai sdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING IMPLEMEMENTATION OF THE AGENDA 2030 FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA June, 2017 ii Ministry of Devolution and Planning P.O Box 30005-00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel:+254-02-2252299 Fax: +254-02-218475 Email:[email protected] Website:www.devolution planning.go.ke iii iv v LIST OF ACRONYMS ASAL Arid and Semi-Arid Lands ASTII Africa Science Innovation Indicators ATMs Automated Teller Machines CIDPs County Integrated Development Programme COG Council of Governors COTU Organization of Trade Unions CSO Civil Society Organizations DaO Delivering as One DLP Digital Literacy Programme DRR Disaster Risk Reduction EAC East Africa Community EASA East Africa School of Aviation ECDE Early Childhood Development Education EDE End Drought Emergencies EmONC Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care FBO Faith Based Organization FGM/C Female Genital Mutilation/Cut FKE Federation of Kenya Employers FPE Free Primary Education GBV Gender
    [Show full text]
  • KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis Published by the Government of Kenya supported by United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce National Council for Population and Development (NCPD) P.O. Box 48994 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-271-1600/01 Fax: +254-20-271-6058 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ncpd-ke.org United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce P.O. Box 30218 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-76244023/01/04 Fax: +254-20-7624422 Website: http://kenya.unfpa.org © NCPD July 2013 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the contributors. Any part of this document may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced or translated in full or in part, provided the source is acknowledged. It may not be sold or used inconjunction with commercial purposes or for prot. KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS JULY 2013 KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS i ii KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................iv FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..........................................................................................................................x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................xi
    [Show full text]
  • The Mdgs and Sauri Millennium Village in Kenya
    An Island of Success in a Sea of Failure? The MDGs and Sauri Millennium Village in Kenya Amrik Kalsi MBA: Master of Business Administration MSc: Master of Science in Management and Organisational Development MA: Master of Arts A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 The School of Social Science Abstract For a number of decades, foreign aid-supported poverty reduction and development concepts, and policies and programmes developed by development agencies and experts implemented since the 1950s, have produced limited short-term and sometimes contradictory results in Kenya. In response to this problem in 2000, the adoption of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) was in many respects a tremendous achievement, gaining unprecedented international support. The MDGs model has since become the policy of choice to reduce poverty and hunger in developing countries by half between 2000 and 2015, being implemented by the Millennium Village Project (MVP) ‘Big-Push’ model, seemingly designed as a ‘bottom-up’ approach. Poverty reduction and sustainable development are key priorities for the Kenyan government and the Kenya Vision 2030 blueprint project. The MDGs process, enacted as the Millennium Village Project (MVP) in Kenya for poverty reduction, is now at the centre of intense debate within Kenya. It is widely recognised that foreign aid maintained MVP and sustainable development through the UN and local efforts, especially in their present form, have largely failed to address poverty in Kenya. Furthermore, not enough was known about the achievements of the MVP model in real- world situations when the MVP model interventions were applied in the Sauri village.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya Sector Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA SECTOR PLAN FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION 2013-2017 KENYA Revitalizing and Harnessing Science, Technology and Innovation for Kenya’s Prosperity and Global Competitiveness i FOREWORD The government recognizes the key role played by Science, Technology and Innovation (ST&I) in wealth creation and building human capital required for the transition to a knowledge driven economy. Vision 2030 proposes to intensify the application of ST&I to raise productivity and efficiency levels across the three pillars of national development. As a result, the Government is implementing the ST&I policy framework through the identification, acquisition, transfer, diffusion and application of relevant ST&I knowledge in all sectors of the economy. The first Medium Term Plan (MTP) 2008-2012 was developed based on the challenges identified in vision 2030 and other policy documents. It was implemented through a coordinated action plan within the context of economic, social and political pillars of the economy. The development of capacities of the national innovation system has been fast tracked to ensure the competitiveness in the international technology market, based on the targeted programmes from the identified sectoral areas. However, more need to be done and as a result, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology and its stakeholders have developed the second MTP for 2013-2017 for the Science, Technology and Innovation sector. This second MTP (2013-2017) proposes more strategic and bold programmes to address the persisting macroeconomic and social-economic challenges, facing the country. The objective of the second MTP is to achieve the transformation to a knowledge based economy that integrates ST&I in national production processes and create technology platforms essential for the development of products, processes and services in a wide range of sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya Vision 2030 a Globally Competitive and Prosperous Kenya
    Kenya Vision 2030 A Globally Competitive and Prosperous Kenya October 2007 THE NATIONAL ANTHEM Swahili English Ee Mungu nguvu yetu O God of all creation Ilete baraka kwetu Bless this our land and nation Haki iwe ngao na mlinzi Justice be our shield and defender Natukae na undugu May we dwell in unity Amani na uhuru Peace and liberty Raha tupate na ustawi Plenty be found within our borders Amkeni ndugu zetu Let one and all arise Tufanye sote bidii With hearts both strong and true Nasi tujitoe kwa nguvu Service be our earnest endeavour Nchi yetu ya Kenya And our homeland of Kenya Tunayoipenda Heritage of splendour Tuwe tayari kuilinda Firm may we stand to defend Natujenge taifa letu Let all with one accord Ee, ndio wajibu wetu In common bond united Kenya istahili heshima Build this our nation together Tuungane mikono And the glory of Kenya Pamoja kazini The fruit of our labour Kila siku tuwe na shukrani Fill every heart with thanksgiving FOREWORD The unveiling of Kenya Vision 2030 marks an important milestone in our country’s development as it comes soon after the successful implementation of the “Economic Recovery Strategy for Wealth and Employment Creation” (ERS) over the period 2003 to-date. The Kenya economy has now recovered from the slow growth rate of 0.6 percent in 2002 to a projected growth of over 7 percent in 2007. Indeed, the last five years represent the best phase of sustained economic growth in our country in all sectors of our economy notably; agriculture, tourism, manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade and telecommunications as well as the social Sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • National-Spatial-Plan
    An integrated Spatial Plan for Balanced and Sustainable National Development Mandera Moyale Lodwar Wajir AIR AIR Isiolo Kakamega Eldoret WATER AIR Meru Garissa Nakuru Kisumu Mwingi Thika Nairobi Kitui AIR Machakos Kajiado Lamu AIR WATER Kilifi Mombasa AIR Diani WATER APPROVAL CERTIFIED Director of Physical Planning DATE________________________________________________________________________ APPROVED Cabinet Secretary for Lands and Physical Planning DATE_______________________________________________________________________ APPROVED PLAN NO.____________________________________________________ National Spatial Plan, 2015-2045 FOREWORD This National Spatial Plan has been prepared by the National Department of Physical Planning, in the Ministry of Lands and Physical Planning within its mandate of preparing national policies on physical planning. This is an important milestone not only for the Ministry but also for the country having been identified as a flagship project under Kenya Vision 2030. The Plan is timely coming at a time when the country is involved in many initiatives to transform into a globally competitive and prosperous nation. The approval of the National Spatial Plan marks an important landmark in our country‟s development agenda. The Plan details the national spatial vision that will guide the long term spatial development of the country for a period of 30 years. It covers the entire territory of Kenya and defines the general trend and direction of spatial development for the country. It aims at achieving an organized, integrated, sustainable and balanced development of the country, hence informing the future use and distribution of activities by providing a framework for better national organization and linkages between different activities within the national space. Land as we all know is inelastic yet it has many competing land uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformative Leadership and Its Development in Public Service Reform in Kenya Gerald Paul Regier Walden University
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2017 Transformative Leadership and Its Development in Public Service Reform in Kenya Gerald Paul Regier Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the African Languages and Societies Commons, African Studies Commons, Public Administration Commons, and the Public Policy Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Social and Behavioral Sciences This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Gerald Regier has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. George Larkin, Committee Chairperson, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Dr. Ron Hirschbein, Committee Member, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Dr. Anthony Leisner, University Reviewer, Public Policy and Administration Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2017 Abstract Transformative Leadership and Its Development in Public Service Reform in Kenya by Gerald (Jerry) Paul Regier MA, Harvard University, 1989 BA, Michigan State University, 1968 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Public Policy and Public Administration Walden University February 2017 Abstract Leadership on the African continent has been a focus of scholars as African nations have incredible human and natural resources but seem to be bereft of the leaders necessary to capitalize on its opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Policies in Kenya and the New Constitution for Vision 2030
    International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology Vol. 2 No. 1; January 2015 HEALTH POLICIES IN KENYA AND THE NEW CONSTITUTION FOR VISION 2030 Agnes W. Kibui, PhD. Senior Lecturer,University of Nairobi, School of Education. Ruth K. Mugo, PhD. Tutorial Fellow, University of Nairobi, School of Education. Grace Nyaga, Senior Lecturer, University of Nairobi, School of Education. Ngesu L. M, PhD. Senior Lecturer, University of Nairobi, School of Education. Mwaniki I. N, PhD. Senior Lecturer, University of Nairobi, College of Humanities and Social Science. Bernard Mwaniki, M.A. Student in Development Studies, St. Pauls University. Abstract Promoting global health ensures progress in basic humanitarian values in saving and improving lives. In recent years, improving global health has proven its advanced value in promoting security and constructive cooperation between countries. A strategic and long-term global health policy helps countries in advancing their core interests in establishing lasting collaborations that save and improve lives of millions globally. This policy helps in creating an environment that enables countries to possess their goals and programs where assessment, cost-effectiveness, and responsibility assume imperative roles. Health challenges are more acute in sub-Saharan Africa compared to other developed nations. These challenges are embedded in a broader context of poverty, poorly developed infrastructure, politically instigated conflicts and disappointingly managed governmental institutions. The sub-Saharan Africa region remains a target of global public health policies and intercessions. Fighting against AIDS, TB, and Malaria, for example, has, in the last decade, spurred an exceptional mobilization of resources to Africa. The Kenya health policies give directions to ensure considerable developments in the position of health in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision 2030 Flagship Projects Progress Report November
    VISION 2030 FLAGSHIP PROJECTS PROGRESS REPORT NOVEMBER 2014 i Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.0 IMPLEMENTATION STATUS ....................................................................................................................... 2 ENABLERS & MACRO ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 ROAD ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.2 LAMU PORT SOUTH-SUDAN-ETHIOPIA TRANSPORT (LAPSSET) CORRIDOR ................................................ 6 1.1.3 AIRPORTS .................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.1.4 SEAPORTS ............................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1.5 RAIL ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1.6 ENERGY ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Mapping Report
    Kenya Education Sector Stakeholders A REPORT SUBMITTED TO PAL NETWORK January 2021 Education Policy Scan in response to the Basic Education Curriculum Framework Principles 3 Contents 1.0 Introduction �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �4 1.1 Overall goal of the Policy Dialogue ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 4 1.2 APD objectives ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 4 2.0 Key Education Stakeholders � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �5 2.1. Research Institutions . 5 2.2 Teacher Training Institutions ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 2.3 Government and associated Semi-Autonomous Government Agencies ���������������������������������������������������������� 5 2.4 Universities �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 8 2.5 Teachers ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 8 2.6 Unions
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya SIGI 2019 Category Medium SIGI Value 2019 35%
    Country Kenya SIGI 2019 Category Medium SIGI Value 2019 35% Discrimination in the family 50% Legal framework on child marriage 25% Percentage of girls under 18 married 13% Legal framework on household responsibilities 50% Proportion of the population declaring that children will suffer if mothers are working outside home for a pay - Female to male ratio of time spent on unpaid care work 2.2 Legal framework on inheritance 75% Legal framework on divorce 50% Restricted physical integrity 29% Legal framework on violence against women 50% Proportion of the female population justifying domestic violence 42% Prevalence of domestic violence against women (lifetime) 39% Legal framework on female genital mutilation (FGM) 25% Share of women who think FGM should continue 6% Share of women who have undergone FGM 21% Sex ratio at birth (natural =105) 105 Legal framework on reproductive rights 75% Female population with unmet needs for family planning 16% Restricted access to productive and financial resources 42% Legal framework on working rights 25% Proportion of the population declaring this is not acceptable for a woman in their family to work outside home for a pay 17% Share of managers (male) 90% Legal framework on access to non-land assets 50% Share of house owners (male) 82% Legal framework on access to land assets 50% Share of agricultural land holders (male) - Legal framework on access to financial services 25% Share of account holders (male) 58% Restricted civil liberties 17% Legal framework on civil rights 0% Legal framework on freedom of movement 0% Percentage of women in the total number of persons not feeling safe walking alone at night 58% Legal framework on political participation 25% Share of the population that believes men are better political leaders than women - Percentage of male MP’s 78% Legal framework on access to justice 25% Share of women declaring lack of confidence in the justice system 48% Note: Higher values indicate higher inequality.
    [Show full text]