What Can Disability Studies Learn from the Culture Wars? Author(s): Tobin Siebers Reviewed work(s): Source: Cultural Critique, No. 55 (Autumn, 2003), pp. 182-216 Published by: University of Minnesota Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1354652 . Accessed: 25/02/2013 15:26 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. University of Minnesota Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Cultural Critique. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded on Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:26:59 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions WHATCAN DISABILITY STUDIES LEARN FROM THECULTURE WARS? Tobin Siebers M y concern in this essay is threefold. First, I will be arguing that disability is a significant register in the many and various dis- putes that have come to be known as the "culture wars." The culture wars are not only about what culture will mean in the future but also about who deserves to be included in our culture, and the determin- ing factor in these political decisions often depends on being able to display a healthy body and mind. Statements that label cultural atti- tudes, minority groups, lifestyles, and works of art as "healthy" or "sick" are not metaphors but aesthetic judgments about the physical and mental condition of citizens.