The Pink Monochrome Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Shaping the Avant-Garde : the Reception of Soviet Constructivism by the American Art Journal ’October’
Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2019 Shaping the avant-garde : the reception of Soviet constructivism by the American art journal ’October’ Müller, Pablo DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190885533.013.10 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-181317 Scientific Publication in Electronic Form Published Version Originally published at: Müller, Pablo (2019). Shaping the avant-garde : the reception of Soviet constructivism by the American art journal ’October’. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190885533.013.10 Shaping the Avant-Garde: The Reception of Soviet Constructivism by the American Art Journal October Shaping the Avant-Garde: The Reception of Soviet Con structivism by the American Art Journal October Pablo Müller The Oxford Handbook of Communist Visual Cultures Edited by Aga Skrodzka, Xiaoning Lu, and Katarzyna Marciniak Subject: Literature, Literary Theory and Cultural Studies, Literary Studies - 20th Century On wards Online Publication Date: Aug 2019 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190885533.013.10 Abstract and Keywords Soviet Constructivism is a central reference for the American art journal October (founded in 1976 and still in print today). This article discusses the ways in which October refers to that historical art movement, while overlooking some of its key political aspira tions. Especially during the journal’s founding years, the discursive association with Sovi et Constructivism served to bestow criticality, urgency, and sociopolitical relevance on the American art journal. Furthermore, with the reference to Sergei Eisenstein and Dziga Vertov, in particular, the October protagonists have positioned themselves in a specific manner within mid-1970s art critical discourse in the United States. -
Ffdoespieszak Pieszak CRITICAL REALISM in CONTEMPORARY ART by Alexandra Oliver BFA, Ryerson University, 2005 MA, University of E
CRITICAL REALISM IN CONTEMPORARY ART by Alexandra Oliver BFA, Ryerson University, 2005 MA, University of Essex, 2007 MA, University of Pittsburgh, 2009 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2014 FfdoesPieszak Pieszak UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Alexandra Oliver It was defended on April 1, 2014 and approved by Terry Smith, Andrew W. Mellon Professor of Contemporary Art History and Theory, History of Art & Architecture Barbara McCloskey, Associate Professor, History of Art & Architecture Daniel Morgan, Associate Professor, Department of Cinema and Media Studies, University of Chicago Dissertation Advisor: Josh Ellenbogen, Associate Professor, History of Art & Architecture ii Copyright © by Alexandra Oliver 2014 iii CRITICAL REALISM IN CONTEMPORARY ART Alexandra Oliver, Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh, 2014 This study responds to the recent reappearance of realism as a viable, even urgent, critical term in contemporary art. Whereas during the height of postmodern semiotic critique, realism was taboo and documentary could only be deconstructed, today both are surprisingly vital. Nevertheless, recent attempts to recover realism after poststructuralism remain fraught, bound up with older epistemological and metaphysical concepts. This study argues instead for a “critical realism” that is oriented towards problems of ethics, intersubjectivity, and human rights. Rather than conceiving of realism as “fit” or identity between representation and reality, it is treated here as an articulation of difference, otherness and non-identity. This new concept draws on the writings of curator Okwui Enwezor, as well as German critical theory, to analyze the work of three artists: Ian Wallace (b. -
Previously Unpublished Talk by and with Thomas Mcevilley At
Previously unpublished talk by and with Thomas McEvilley at Moore College of Art and Design, Philadelphia, on the occasion of the exhibition “ Jo Baer: Recent Works ,” March 3 – April 1, 1993. Thomas McEvilley: Recently, many things have changed about the way we view art and artists. One of the variables has to do with the traits that are expected in a career or oeuvre viewed in its broadest outline. Not long ago, an artist was expected to maintain a signature style more or less permanently. That was a part of the modernist ideology of art which assumed that artwork was based on aesthetic universals, or on the quest for them. In this view, if an artist were to change his or her style in mid - career, it meant either that the earlier work had not in fact been in c ontact with aesthetic universals, or if it had been, then the later work was not. An artist was, as it were, trapped in a style, or rather, trapped in a grip of the universals he or she had contacted. It was when Jackson Pollock changed his style in the ea rly ‘50s that Clement Greenberg declared Pollock’s contact with the universals to have been broken. This was a part of the crypto - religious aspect of modernist aestheticism — an idea expressed long ago by Matthew Arnold about the aesthetics of his own time. In a sense, Post - Modernism consists simply in the exposure of the crypto - religious structure of Modernism, and in an attempt to genuinely secularize it. Nowadays, the saintly, religious aura that used to attach to the artist is seen as an embarrassment, as is the aura that once attached to the artwork as if it were a holy relic, and the deeply felt, personal style perceived as a sign of consecration, and so on. -
Miguel Mathus Monochrome and Trace in Contemporary Painting
Miguel Mathus Monochrome and Trace in Contemporary Painting Royal College of Art PhD 2018 1 Abstract This project explicitly addresses the persistent question of the monochrome. I want to develop several figures of thought such as inscription, erasure and trace in order to examine new ways in which this question might find fresh trajectories of formulation. Historically, the monochrome has attracted discussions related to the autonomy of painting, the circularity of process, chromatic purity, repetition, limits, transcendence, the beyond of representation. The project does not aim to formulate the question of the identity of contemporary abstraction but instead explore the questions related to abstraction’s temporality. The monochrome appears to resist a pure art historical discourse because of the way that it has always been close to a speculative drive within philosophical aesthetics. In this regard I wish to test this relationship between ways of mediating the visual in terms of language and the schemas assumed by the modulation of the ‘seeable’ into the ‘sayable’. Jacques Derrida is an important figure for my research in terms of his thinking about the trace and the play of absence and presence. These concepts will be engaged with alongside accounts of the monochrome in contemporary art history. This intellectual project is anchored by the relationship to my own studio practice, which involves an overlapping of elements that are added and dismantled until a definitive form is achieved. The physical nature of the materials is, thus, central to the activity. Materials are added and removed; the latter process is frequently the more important. The surface is worked through a restrained process of making, trading one factor against another until a resolution becomes possible. -
The Storied Space of Korean Dansaekhwa: the 1992 and 2012 Exhibitions
M+ Matters | Postwar Abstraction in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan [28 June 2014] www.mplusmatters.hk The Storied Space of Korean Dansaekhwa: The 1992 and 2012 Exhibitions Yeon Shim Chung This paper looks at the way two exhibitions of Dansaekhwa—at the Tate gallery, Liverpool, in 1992 and the National Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art in Seoul in 2012— created a storied space and narrative of “non-artificial nature” and modernist Korean aesthetics.i Dansaekhwa is known as postwar Korean abstract painting, which is also referred to as monochrome painting, Dansaekjo. Although numerous terms have been used to describe Korean abstract paintings, the recent retrospective exhibition curated by Yoon Jin Sup in 2012 in Korea clarified the current terms that I deploy in this paper. Dansaekhwa, widespread in the 1970s, marked a concrete contribution to the history of modern and contemporary Korean art, with several landmark exhibitions in Korea garnering critical attention. We shall look at two exhibitions: one outside Korea and the other in Korea, marking a twenty-year interval. Taken together, I want to create embedded stories pertaining to Dansaekhwa, which is said to be non-objective art without any narrative or subject matter. My aim will be to approach this work from a contextual vantage point while replying to the critical writing of Lee Yil (1932-1997), Dansaekhwa’s main protagonist critic. It is my hope to reconsider Dansaekhwa as a site or a storied “pictorial and social” space, thus fortifying its salient critical stories and formal innovations. 1. Dansaekhwa: Lee Yil’s “Hwanwon” and “Hwaksan” Dansaekhwa, postwar abstract art in Korea, was loosely formed in the 1970s and continues to exist in the work of artists of the younger generation. -
STEPHEN ANTONAKOS Laconia, Greece 1926 — New York 2013
STEPHEN ANTONAKOS Laconia, Greece 1926 — New York 2013 Antonakos’s work with neon since 1960 has lent the medium new perceptual and formal meanings in hundreds of gallery and museum exhibitions first in New York and then internationally. His use of spare, complete and incomplete geometric neon forms has ranged from direct 3-D indoor installations to painted Canvases, Walls, the well known back- lit Panels with painted or gold surfaces, his Rooms and Chapels. Starting in the 1970s he installed over 55 architecturally-scaled permanent Public Works in the USA, Europe, Israel, and Japan. Throughout, he conceived work in relation to its site — its scale, proportions, and character — and to the space that it shares with the viewer. He called his art, “real things in real spaces,” intending it to be seen without reference to anything outside the immediate visual and kinetic experience. Colored pencil drawings on paper and vellum, often in series, have been a major, rich practice since the 1950s; as has his extensive work with collage. Other major practices include the conceptual Packages, small-edition Artist’s Books, silver and white Reliefs, prints, and — since 2011 — several series of framed and 3-D Gold Works. Antonakos was born in the small Greek village of Agios Nikolaos in 1926 and moved to New York with his family in 1930. In the late 1940s, after returning from the US Army, he established his first studio in New York’s fur district. From the early 1960s forward, until the end in 2013, he worked in studios in Soho. EXHIBITIONS 2018 to 2019 “Antonakos: The Room Chapel” Curated by Elaine Mehelakes — Allentown Art Museum, Allentown, PA, May 6, 2018 - May 5, 2019 2018 “Antonakos: Proscenium” Curated by Helaine Posner — Neuberger Museum of Art, SUNY Purchase, NY, Jan. -
Now-You-See-It.Pdf
1 Now You See It, Now You Don’t by Barbara Rose Art is magic… But how is it magic? In its metaphysical development? Or does some final transformation culminate in a magic reality? In truth, the latter is impossible without the former. If creation is not magic, the outcome cannot be magic. —Hans Hoffman Tony DeLap is unique in that he has been associated with not one but with so many of the dominant trends of the late-twentieth-century abstraction: minimalism, optical art, primary structures, hard edge painting, California light and space, and site-specific sculpture. His work intentionally eludes categorization. Though he has been linked to the major movements of the sixties, he has never south the immediate visual impact that characterizes the art of that decade. His object constructions, paintings, and sculptures are personal and quirky—not generic or formulaic. They are not instantly assimilated, but take time to understand, experience, and explore. 2 There is a discernable logic to the evolution of DeLap’s style. However, the reasons he changes scale, medium, materials, and technique—always within the context of a geometric consistency—are not programmatic. Consequently his works are not predictable or even serial. DeLap is an intuitive, intellectually curious experimenter rather that a conceptual, goal-oriented strategist, which means the outcome of his process is always a surprise. This has worked against him, as has his decision to remain in California, because the art market does not appreciate unpredictability, geographic detachment, or work that is not immediately digestible by a public with an increasingly shorter attention span. -
Curator and Critic Tours Connective Conversations
CURATOR AND CRITIC TOURS CONNECTIVE CONVERSATIONS: INSIDE OREGON ART 2011–2014 THE FORD FAMILY FOUNDATION AND UNIVERSITY OF OREGON 2 3 The Ford Family Foundation’s Visual Arts program honors the interests in the visual arts by Mrs. Hallie Ford, a co-founder of The Foundation. The principal goals are to help enhance the quality of artistic endeavor and body of work by Oregon’s most promising visual artists and to improve Oregon’s visual arts ecology by making strategic investments in Oregon visual arts institutions. The program was launched in 2010, and in 2014 it was extended through TABLE OF CONTENTS 2019. The Foundation supports a range of program components, among them Connective Conversations as part of the Curator and Critic Tours and Lectures Series during which it partners with regionally-based institutions to invite professionals from outside the Northwest to conduct one-on-one studio visits and to join in community conversations. The Ford Family Foundation has collaborated with the University of Oregon School of Architecture and Allied Arts to conduct the Connec- o6 o7 o8 tive Conversations | Inside Oregon Art Series since its launch in 2011. THE FORD FAMILY INTRODUCTION IN THE STUDIO Kate Wagle, Director, George Baker, Curator Critic The Curator and Critic Tours and Lectures Series is the seventh and final FOUNDATION element of The Ford Family Foundation’s Visual Arts Program’s investment in VISUAL ARTS PROGRAM UO School of Architecture Professor of Art History Oregon visual arts institutions. Anne C Kubisch, President, and Allied Arts in Portland University of California This publication is made possible by The Ford Family Foundation and the University of Oregon. -
Jeffrey Cortland Jones
Jeffrey Cortland Jones Education The University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH . 2000 Masters of Fine Art (Terminal) . Painting and Drawing The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN 1998 Bachelors of Fine Art . Painting and Drawing Gallery Representation/Affiliations Angela Meleca Gallery, Columbus, OH 2015-present Gallery IMA, Seattle, WA. 2015-present Galleri Urbane, Dallas + Marfa, TX. 2014-present Gray Contemporary, Houston, TX. (flat file) 2014-present Kathryn Markel Fine Arts, New York, NY. 2012-present Marta Hewitt Gallery, Cincinnati, OH. (flat file) 2015-present Matthew Rachman Gallery, Chicago, IL. 2017-presnet Minus Space, Brooklyn, NY. (flat file) 2010-present TWFine Art, Brisbane, Australia. 2016-present Online Scholarly Resources Geoform http://geoform.net/artists/jeffrey-cortland-jones/ Teaching Professor of Art, Painting, The University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 2003-present Solo / Two Person Exhibitions 2018 “New Clear Dawn”, Galleri Urbane, Dallas, TX. “Michael Craik | Jeffrey Cortland Jones”, @Gallery, Edinburgh, Scotland. (2 person) “Tom Wilmott + Jeffrey Cortland Jones”, Divisible, Dayton, OH. (2 person) 2017 “In the Flat Field”, Raygun Projects, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia. “Sara Pittman + Jeffrey Cortland Jones”, Matthew Rachman Gallery, Chicago, IL. (2 person) “of all the things we’ve made / paper play”, INDEX : A University of Dayton Project Space, Dayton, OH. “Tom Wilmott + Jeffrey Cortland Jones”, Lewisham Arthouse, London, England. (2 person) “Lines on the Horizon : Works by Jeffrey and Heather Jones”, Marshall University, Huntington, WV. (2 person) 2016 “Jeffrey Cortland Jones”, Pratt Institute, Brooklyn, NY. “Closer, Still”, Kathryn Markel Fine Arts, New York. NY. “Curses (Demotape) : Jeffrey Cortland Jones”, Boecker Contemporary Project Space, Heidelberg, Germany. “Clenched Fists, Black Eyes”, NIAD Art Center, Richmond, CA. -
Speak, Painting: Word and Device in Early Johns*
Speak, Painting: Word and Device in Early Johns* HARRY COOPER It bore a device, a herald’s wording of which might serve for a motto and brief description of our now concluded legend, so somber is it, and relieved only by one ever-glowing point of light gloomier than the shadow: ON A FIELD, SABLE, THE LETTER A, GULES. —Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Scarlet Letter This Is a Device The pun is hard to resist: Device Circle (1959) is pivotal. A slat of wood . is fixed with a screw at the center of the square can- vas, free to rotate; its action is revealed by the trace it has been deployed to leave behind: a perfect circle etched into the paint surface by means of a stylus (a nail?) once fitted through a small hole at the other end of the device, pressed into the paint, and made to pivot. But what turns on it? Or (to begin more modestly) what shift does the painting mark in the work? On the one hand, it looks back to the Targets, for Johns must have used a similar device, probably an anchored string, to draw the five circles of each target, except that Device Circle preserves the device in the fin- ished work, makes it part of the object. The device thickens, surfaces. On the other hand, the painting looks forward, as Jeffrey Weiss has written, to “two simultaneous sequences of work: a group of paintings and drawings . that bear the stenciled words RED, YELLOW, and BLUE; and works that deploy or * My thanks to Jeffrey Weiss for inviting me to speak at a symposium on the occasion of his exhibition Jasper Johns: An Allegory of Painting, 1955–1965, at the National Gallery of Art, and to Nan Rosenthal, who extended a similar invitation when the exhibition Jasper Johns: Gray was shown at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. -
Ottmar Hörl's Salient Points Ottmar Hörl
Ottmar Hörl‘s Salient Points Ottmar Hörl (* 1950, Nauheim) is one of the most renowned German contemporary artists. His works and large sculptures made of industrially manufactured plastic are based on the idea of the serial design principle. In numerous publicity projects he has shown how art can regain its necessary place in public life. Ottmar Hörl's work focuses on the aesthetics of everyday culture. At the same time, the artist sees himself as an initiator of communication processes. Through deliberate provocation, he initiates discussions and encourages changed ways of thinking and seeing. With his extraordinary ideas, the artist also plays a major role in art history. Thus, the Broom pieces of Ottmar Hörl are an innovative extension of the monochrome, whose creation goes back to the year 1915. With Kazimir Malevich's Black Square, the abstraction, which begun in Cubism, reached its peak. The first completely monochrome painting (ancient Greek monos = "only" and chroma = "color") became an icon of painting of the 20th century. This style of painting with the goal of maximum concentration and reduction continued with the ultramarine paintings of the French artist Yves Klein in 1955. Since 1993, Ottmar Hörl has also dealt with the concept of the monochrome: "What has always disturbed me in a monochrome is the lack of depth - [...] on canvas it is only a wafer-thin surface. What I'm interested in is the sensual presence of a monochrome, that it has depth!" In response, the artist created a Broom piece in 1993 for the first time. With these sculptures, Ottmar Hörl wants to investigate whether works of art can be derived from an everyday object such as the broom. -
Assignment: What Is Art?
Assignment: What is Art? Artist: Brice Marden Title: Grove Group 1 Date: 1972 Media: Oil and Wax on Canvas Size: Approximately 6 by 9 feet Monochrome (one-color) paintings as art: It is difficult for some viewers to accept monochrome paintings - one that consists entirely of a single color or subtle variations on one color. They encounter even more resistance, since they have no apparent subject of any kind – no stylized horses, no multicolored grids, not even stripes. Monochrome paintings are probably the most challenging type of abstract art. A monochrome painting is typically one large rectangle of color. Why would anyone want to make such a work? For that matter why would anyone want to look at it? People create and study monochrome paintings for the same reason that they become fascinated with any other kind of visual art: because, in the end, all art is an arrangement of colors and shapes, which some (though not all) viewers find exciting. Many people have strong feelings about colors, whether in the abstract or when buying cars, clothes, and mini-blinds. Visual artists, like other people, tend to favor certain hues and avoid ones they dislike, but some painters become so fascinated with a particular color that merely using on a multicolored composition is not enough. Instead they devote entire canvases – or a series of canvases – to explore variations on that color. With Grove Group 1, Brice Marden decided to create a gray-green rectangle, so large that it becomes not merely a patch of color hanging on the wall but the wall itself.