American Melancholia in Modernist Narratives of the First World War Michael Von Cannon Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2016 The aD rkest Nation: American Melancholia in Modernist Narratives of the First World War Michael Von Cannon Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Von Cannon, Michael, "The aD rkest Nation: American Melancholia in Modernist Narratives of the First World War" (2016). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3298. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3298 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE DARKEST NATION: AMERICAN MELANCHOLIA IN MODERNIST NARRATIVES OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of English by Michael Von Cannon B.A., Palm Beach Atlantic University, 2006 M.A., University of York, 2009 August 2016 “One may also speak of melancholy states or nations.” - Jonathan Flatley, Affective Mapping: Melancholia and the Politics of Modernism ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Although in this dissertation I propose the idea of melancholy nationalism in American modernist war writing, the project could not have developed into what it is without a drastically different community composed of scholars, friends, and family members. First and foremost, I owe a debt of gratitude to my committee members—Jerry Kennedy, Carl Freedman, Elsie Michie, and Nick Erickson—who generously and enthusiastically provided insightful comments and suggestions on various chapter drafts. I also want to extend thanks to many other colleagues who have read or heard portions of this project or who have otherwise made time to discuss it with me. These include Dustin Anderson, William Boelhower, Mark Cirino, Kirk Curnutt, Suzanne del Gizzo, Madoka Kishi, Phil Maciak, and Joseph Wingenbach. As well, I am grateful to Michael Bibler and my fellow graduate students who took part in his publication and professionalization course: Stacey Amo, Christie Cognevich, Megan Feifer, Cristina Rosell, and Logan Wiedenfeld. Additionally, this project has been supported by dissertation fellowships, travel grants, and research grants provided through the generosity of Louisiana State University, the Hemingway Society, the Modernist Studies Association, and the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation. Lastly, without the love and support of my wife, Jordan Von Cannon, and our one- year-old son, this project would never have become what it is today. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………..............iii ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………….v CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………...1 2. DEAD CENTER: THE IRONY OF NEUTRALITY IN WILLA CATHER’S ONE OF OURS………………………………….……………………………………….24 3. FORGETTEN RACE: NICK ADAMS’S MECHANIZED WAR……….……………...60 4. BORDERLINE ROMANCE: THE INCEST PLOT IN H.D.’S KORA AND KA AND F. SCOTT FITZGERALD’S TENDER IS THE NIGHT……………………..…..102 5. MARTIAL FUTURES: GERTRUDE STEIN AND THE GEOGRAPHICAL HISTORY OF WAR……………………………………………………………….…...136 CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………..……………………..177 BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………..………………………………………..186 VITA…………………………………………………………………..………………………..198 iv ABSTRACT My dissertation, entitled The Darkest Nation: American Melancholia in Modernist Narratives of the First World War, re-conceptualizes U.S. modernism by attending to how the historical event of WWI inaugurated melancholia, or sustained grief, as the cornerstone of a new form of nationalism. Scholars have focused either on how consolatory mourning bolstered patriotism or how melancholia led to the demise of such an imagined community and to the growth of cosmopolitanism. I consider, however, an American modernist commitment to the nation of loss expressed, surprisingly enough, in narratives about noncombatants. For a country that entered the military conflict near its end, noncombatancy (in the form of political neutrality and survivor’s guilt) shapes the literary contours of America’s melancholy wartime and postwar identity. In proposing a revised understanding of nationalism, I examine canonical modernist novels such as Willa Cather’s One of Ours and F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Tender is the Night and understudied works including H.D.’s story Kora and Ka, Ernest Hemingway’s story sequence In Our Time, and Gertrude Stein’s book The Geographical History of America. Overall, the project traces a pivotal shift in narratives about nationalist melancholia by exploring the complexities and even contradictions of noncombatancy. Initially a strategy of political neutrality adapted by modernists into a mode of narrative irony incompatible with mourning, by the end of the project it becomes a way for modernists to describe how the nation actually leads the charge to initiate senseless world wars solely to rekindle its citizens’—and writers’—patriotism. Whether through prewar neutrality that forestalls consolatory mourning or through postwar peace that remains ever forestalled, modernist American literature develops a dark, melancholy brand of nationalist sentiment formed at moments when character identity becomes most untenable, warfare most irreparable, and postwar future most unfathomable. v INTRODUCTION More than a century since the outbreak of the First World War and on the threshold of the armistice anniversary, the WWI Centennial Commission is making plans for a new memorial to be built in Washington D.C., just steps from the White House, in honor of the country’s virtuous mission and the soldiers who died to fulfill it. The architect Joe Weishaar and sculptor Sabin Howard have proposed a monument park composed of green spaces, statues, and 137-foot long ornamental walls. Each cubic foot of these walls will represent one of the American soldiers killed in battle during the war. As the centerpiece of the memorial, an 81-foot long “Wall of Remembrance” will feature 23 relief sculptures of combat scenes alongside quotes from politicians such as President Woodrow Wilson and writers including Ernest Hemingway. Entitled “The Weight of Sacrifice,” the memorial “is a space for freedom built upon the great weight of sacrifice. The allegorical idea that public space and public freedom are hard won through the great sacrifice of countless individuals in the pursuit of liberty provides the original design concept for this project” (Weishaar and Howard). The proposal echoes platitudes—home of the free because of the brave; if not for us, you would all be speaking German—but those by no means make the memorial insignificant. Especially in the shadow of an ever-growing cynicism about the country’s participation in the seemingly never-ending “war on terror,” the designers have altered the idea of WWI to fit present circumstances. Although the War in Afghanistan and the War in Iraq have officially ended, they have contributed to the now ongoing Iraqi Civil War against the newly formed ISIS, more recent terrorist attacks against Syrian refugees and the citizens of both Paris and Brussels, and a resignation that we live in the shadow of wartime without end. Rather than symbolize WWI as a war to end all wars, Howard and Weishaar suggest that honorable and just wars needed to be waged in the early twentieth century just as they do today. 1 In The Darkest Nation: American Melancholia in Modernist Narratives of the First World War, I argue that many modernist writers, including some of those whose quotes will be etched into the “Wall of Remembrance,” constructed a literary war memorialization quite at odds with the national sculpture that will be under construction starting in 2017. The memorial misses a key aspect of the country’s engagement in the war. The U.S. spent most of the war as a neutral party or noncombatant nation, not a belligerent. Rather than suffering a staggering number of casualties like the other countries, it only entered the war near the end, after a drawn-out, nearly four-year period of neutrality. Even when Wilson finally declared war on Germany in the spring of 1917, many individuals who enlisted and trained for combat never actually made it over to the front lines. I contend that, rather than a series of combat images, the cultural memory of American involvement could, more often than not, be illustrated through its lack thereof. Noncombatancy, however, does not signal a complete turning away from national memorialization; rather, I argue that it signals a profound shift away from any consolation about the country’s mission that actually bolsters nationalism in modernist narratives. Before outlining the concept of melancholy nationalism as it unfolded in modernist war writing, let me first turn to modernism itself. Of the terms that compose the subtitle to this project, modernism will be the least radically revised, which does not mean that it will not be redefined in the ensuing pages. No reader will, I think, be caught off-guard by the list of authors discussed: Willa Cather, H.D., F. Scott Fitzgerald, William Faulkner, Ernest Hemingway, and Gertrude Stein; nor will they be struck by the way I attribute