DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2102.01755V2 [Hep-Ph] 4 Mar 2021 Rect Solution with the Discovery of the Matter-Induced of Ssms with Different Metallicities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2102.01755V2 [Hep-Ph] 4 Mar 2021 Rect Solution with the Discovery of the Matter-Induced of Ssms with Different Metallicities Measuring solar neutrinos over Gigayear timescales with Paleo Detectors Natalia Tapia-Arellano1, ∗ and Shunsaku Horiuchi1, y 1Center for Neutrino Physics, Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA (Dated: March 5, 2021) Measuring the solar neutrino flux over gigayear timescales could provide a new window to inform the Solar Standard Model as well as studies of the Earth's long-term climate. We demonstrate the feasibility of measuring the time-evolution of the 8B solar neutrino flux over gigayear timescales using paleo detectors, naturally occurring minerals which record neutrino-induced recoil tracks over geological times. We explore suitable minerals and identify track lengths of 15{30 nm to be a practical window to detect the 8B solar neutrino flux. A collection of ultra-radiopure minerals of different ages, each some 0.1 kg by mass, can be used to probe the rise of the 8B solar neutrino flux over the recent gigayear of the Sun's evolution. We also show that models of the solar abundance problem can be distinguished based on the time-integrated tracks induced by the 8B solar neutrino flux. I. INTRODUCTION [15, 16]). As a result, the solar structure is now very well constrained. By now, solar neutrinos and helioseismol- The concept of \Solar Activity" is used by the scien- ogy provide a clear view of the present energy generation tific community to study the fact that the Sun is not a rate of the Sun. By contrast, photons reveal the power 4 5 static quiet object and, in contrast to what was thought generation roughly 10 {10 years ago, corresponding to in ancient times, evolves [1]. Studying and understand- the energy transport timescale within the solar interior ing solar activity not only benefits science itself, but af- [17]. Within measurement uncertainties, the neutrino fects directly our environment as living beings and has and photon observations match, revealing the stability of the solar activity on 105 year scales. broad implications: strong solar activity affects directly ∼ our communications and travel systems and of course, However, recent measurements of the solar elemental our planet's climate [2{4]. abundances (metallicity) by Asplund et al. 2009 (here- Fundamental to the study of the evolution of the Sun after AGSS) [18] have caused a new conflict within the is the Solar Standard Model (SSM), a theoretical tool to SSM. The new photospheric measurements indicate that investigate the solar interior. First attempts to build a the solar metallicity is lower than previously estimated solar model to understand and predict more accurately by Grevesse & Sauval 1998 (hereafter GS) [19]. The SSM its core central temperature and to estimate the rates is sensitive to transitions in metals (used to refer to any- of solar neutrinos started in the mid 20th century, and thing above helium), which are an important contributor culminated in the SSM by Bahcall et al. [5]. Over the to opacity. Lower metallicity is associated with a cooler decades, the SSM has been developed and stringently solar core, and in this way, affects the solar interior. So- tested with a variety of measurements, not only neutrinos lar models using the new metallicity are no longer able to but also helioseismology (for recent reviews, see, e.g., [6]). reproduce helioseismic results, causing the so-called \so- Initial measurements of the solar neutrinos resulted in lar abundance problem" [6, 20]. Extended SSMs, where less neutrinos than predicted by the SSM, known as the some of the assumptions of the SSM are relaxed, have \solar neutrino problem." Many solutions were devel- been explored as potential solutions, e.g., early accretion oped based on producing a cooler solar core, but the causing chemical inhomogeneities [21]. While the debate phenomenon of neutrino oscillations [7] proved the cor- continues, a pragmatic approach has been to use two sets arXiv:2102.01755v2 [hep-ph] 4 Mar 2021 rect solution with the discovery of the matter-induced of SSMs with different metallicities. Neutrinos are one Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein mechanism [8{11] and di- way to observationally test the solar abundance prob- rect measurement of all neutrino flavours of solar neu- lem through their dependence on the metallicity of the trinos by the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO) ex- stellar interior. A lower metallicity causes a lower core periment [12, 13]. Presently, much of the solar neutrino temperature which in turn has a strong impact on neu- flux has been experimentally verified (see, e.g., [6, 14]). trino fluxes, in particular those involving nuclei in their In addition, helioseismic observations probe important production chain, e.g., 8B, CNO neutrinos. properties of the solar interior, such as the sound speed Detecting weakly-interacting particles like solar neu- profile, depth of the convective envelope, and surface trinos requires immense volumes to instrument enough helium abundance, to percent or better precision (e.g., target numbers to have an appreciable number of neu- trino interactions. The same difficulties faced by neutrino measurements are encountered in direct searches for dark matter, where experiments seek to observe the scatter- ∗ [email protected] ing of target nuclei by an incoming dark matter particle. y [email protected] Recently, it has been proposed that rock crystals deep 2 in the Earth could act as a new method to detect dark ature, approximately T 24 (by contrast, the dominant matter [22{25]. Called \paleo detectors", the idea is that pp chain has a T 4 dependence)/ [28]. Since most of the dark matter interactions will leave permanent structure 8B flux is emitted/ from the interior 5{10% of the solar or chemical changes (tracks) caused by the recoiling nu- radius, the 8B neutrinos provide a probe of the solar in- clei within the rocks. By strategically collecting samples terior. It is sensitive to the interior metal abundance, from geologically quiet areas, the tracks can survive geo- due to the metallicity's influence on the electromagnetic logical periods and measured in the lab through small an- opacity and hence temperature gradient inside the Sun. gle X-ray scattering. And by sampling from deep under- We model the Sun using the MESA code version r12115 ground, backgrounds caused by cosmic-ray interactions [29{33], closely following the procedure outlined in Farag in the Earth atmosphere can be mitigated. An unavoid- et al. 2020 [34]. We adopt their solar models calibrated able background comes from radioactivity of the Earth, to reproduce the present day neutrino fluxes, with final 10 but this can be rejected based on their rich track sig- age t = 4:568 Gyr [35], radius R = 6:9566 10 33 × natures. Furthermore, paleo detectors have competitive cm [36], photon luminosity Lγ = 3:828 10 erg/s [36], exposures compared to terrestrial experiments. Exposure and surface metallicity Z=X. These are× obtained by us- is the product of the target mass and duration in time. ing the built-in MESA simplex module to vary iteratively In the case of paleo detectors, 1 Gyr old samples are the mixing-length parameter and the initial hydrogen, possible, so even a small mass∼ of 10 mg would be com- helium, and metal compositions, including the effects of petitive with a terrestrial experiment of 103 kg running element diffusion [32]. The helioseimic signals of these for 10 years: both have exposures " = 0:01 kg Myr. models have been confirmed to be similar to others in In this paper, we consider the detectability of solar the literature [37]. We refer the reader to Ref. [34] for neutrinos using paleo detectors. The energies of solar further details of the calculations. neutrinos are about 1 MeV, which translate to keV We compute two SSMs made to match two differ- of recoil energy. This∼ is comparable to the recoil∼ ener- ent abundance of heavy metals at the surface of the gies ER = 0:1 100 keV caused by dark matter, meaning Sun: Z=X = 0:0229 for GS [19] and Z=X = 0:0181 for solar neutrinos− should also give rise to damage tracks. AGSS [18]. We use the built-in MESA reaction network Importantly, paleo detectors not only open a new way add pp extras to model the reactions emitting neutri- to search for solar neutrinos, they allow us to probe the nos, including pp, pep, 7Be, and 8B. For the CNO chain, Sun in the past on Gyr time scales, something that is not we use the add cno extras and add hot cno and com- possible with terrestrial detectors. Recently, paleo detec- pute the neutrinos from 13N, 15O, and 17F. Our obtained tors have been considered also as detectors of supernova neutrino fluxes for the two metallicity models, compared neutrinos [26] and atmospheric neutrinos [27] over simi- to experimentally measured values, are listed in Table I. lar geological times. To investigate the study of the SSM Our predicted fluxes are similar to those in the literature with paleo detectors, we compute two SSMs that differ in [34, 37, 38]. In Figure 1, we show the time evolution of their metallicity. We focus on the 8B neutrino flux, which these neutrino fluxes, as a function of years in the past. shows strong dependence on the solar interior tempera- We show results only for the GS metallicity model, as the ture and metallicity models. The 8B neutrinos are also AGSS is very similar on these scales. among the highest in energy, making them easier to de- tect compared to other higher-flux but lower-energy solar Channel GS AGSS Measurement neutrino components. +0:003 Φpp 5.98 6.01 6:05(1−0:011) This paper is organized as follows. In Section II, we go +0:05 Φ7Be 4.95 4.71 4:82(1 ) through our computation of the history of the solar neu- −0:04 Φ8 5.09 4.62 5:00(1 ± 0:03) trino flux with different metallicities which give us the B Φ 5.12 3.92 7:0(1+0:43) time dependency of the flux.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recommended Conventions for Reporting Results from Direct Dark Matter Searches
    Recommended conventions for reporting results from direct dark matter searches D. Baxter1, I. M. Bloch2, E. Bodnia3, X. Chen4,5, J. Conrad6, P. Di Gangi7, J.E.Y. Dobson8, D. Durnford9, S. J. Haselschwardt10, A. Kaboth11,12, R. F. Lang13, Q. Lin14, W. H. Lippincott3, J. Liu4,5,15, A. Manalaysay10, C. McCabe16, K. D. Mor˚a17, D. Naim18, R. Neilson19, I. Olcina10,20, M.-C. Piro9, M. Selvi7, B. von Krosigk21, S. Westerdale22, Y. Yang4, and N. Zhou4 1Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics and Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA 2School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel 3University of California, Santa Barbara, Department of Physics, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 4INPAC and School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, MOE Key Lab for Particle Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai 200240, China 5Shanghai Jiao Tong University Sichuan Research Institute, Chengdu 610213, China 6Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, Stockholm SE-10691, Sweden 7Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna and INFN-Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy 8University College London, Department of Physics and Astronomy, London WC1E 6BT, UK 9Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2R3, Canada 10Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 11STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (RAL), Didcot, OX11 0QX, UK 12Royal Holloway,
    [Show full text]
  • The INT @ 20 the Future of Nuclear Physics and Its Intersections July 1 – 2, 2010
    The INT @ 20 The Future of Nuclear Physics and its Intersections July 1 – 2, 2010 Program Thursday, July 1: 8:00 – 8:45: Registration (Kane Hall, Rom 210) 8:45 – 9:00: Opening remarks Mary Lidstrom, Vice Provost for Research, University of Washington David Kaplan, INT Director Session chair: David Kaplan 9:00 – 9:45: Science & Society 9:00 – 9:45 Steven Koonin, Undersecretary for Science, DOE The future of DOE and its intersections 9:45 – 10:30: Strong Interactions and Fundamental Symmetries 9:45 – 10:30 Howard Georgi, Harvard University QCD – From flavor SU(3) to effective field theory 10:30 – 11:00: Coffee Break Session chair: Martin Savage 11:00 – 11:30 Silas Beane, University of New Hampsire Lattice QCD for nuclear physics 11:30 – 12:00 Paulo Bedaque, University of Maryland Effective field theories in nuclear physics 12:00 – 12:30 Michael Ramsey-Musolf, University of Wisconsin Fundamental symmetries of nuclear physics: A window on the early Universe 12:30 – 2:00: Lunch (Mary Gates Hall) 1 Thursday, July 1 2:00 – 5:00: From Partons to Extreme Matter Session chair: Gerald Miller 2:00 – 2:30 Matthias Burkardt, New Mexico State University Transverse (spin) structure of hadrons 2:30 – 3:00 Barbara Jacak, SUNY Stony Brook Quark-gluon plasma: from particles to fields? 3:00 – 3:45 Raju Venugopalan, Brookhaven National Lab Wee gluons and their role in creating the hottest matter on Earth 3:45 – 4:15: Coffee Break Session chair: Krishna Rajagopal 4:15 – 4:45 Jean-Paul Blaizot, Saclay Is the quark-gluon plasma strongly or weakly coupled? 4:45
    [Show full text]
  • Tritium Beta Decay and the Search for Neutrino Mass
    ritium Beta Decay and the Search for Neutrino Mass Tritium Beta Decay and the Search for Neutrino Mass eutrinos have been around, that the decay also produced a second neutrino mass. A short lifetime literally, since the beginning unseen particle, now called the means atoms decay more rapidly, Nof time. In the sweltering electron neutrino. The neutrino would making more data available. moments following the Big Bang, share the energy released in the decay A wonderful accident of nature, tri- neutrinos were among the first particles with the daughter atom and the tium (a hydrogen atom with two extra Tritium Beta Decay and the Search to emerge from the primordial sea. electron. The electrons would emerge neutrons) is a perfect source by both A minute later, the universe had cooled with a spectrum of energies. of these measures: it has a reasonably for Neutrino Mass enough for protons and neutrons In 1934, Enrico Fermi pointed out short lifetime (12.4 years) and releases to bind together and form atomic that, if the neutrino had mass, it would only 18.6 kilo-electron-volts (keV) Thomas J. Bowles and R. G. Hamish Robertson as told to David Kestenbaum nuclei. Ten or twenty billion years subtly distort the tail of this spectrum. as it decays into helium-3. later—today—the universe still teems When an atom undergoes beta decay, it Additionally, its molecular structure with these ancient neutrinos, which produces a specific amount of available is simple enough that the energy outnumber protons and neutrons by energy that is carried away by the spectrum of the decay electrons can roughly a billion to one.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrino Mass and Oscillations 1 Introduction
    Neutrino Mass and Oscillations R. G. Hamish Robertson Department of Physics, University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 1 Introduction The neutrino remains as exotic and challenging today as it was seventy years ago when first proposed by Pauli. What is known for certain about neutrinos is minimal indeed. They have spin 1 , charge 0, negative helicity, and exist in 3 2 flavors, electron, mu, and tau. Strictly speaking, only 2 flavors are certain: direct observation of the tau neutrino has not yet been achieved, but an experiment, DONUT, at Fermilab is in progress with this objective [1]. Limits on the masses from direct, kinematic experiments (ones that do not require assumptions about the non-conservation of lepton family numbers) have been steadily lowered by experiments of ever-increasing sophistication over the years, with the results given in Table 1. As will be discussed below, there are stronger limits on the mass of νe from tritium beta decay [2, 3], but the data show curious distortions near the endpoint that are not at present understood. Electron Family νe < 15 eV e− 510999.06 eV Mu Family νµ < 170keV µ− 105658.389 keV Tau Family ντ < 18 MeV τ− 1777.1 MeV Table 1: The kinematic mass limits for neutrinos, compared to the known masses of their charged-lepton partners [4] There are strong theoretical and experimental motivations to search for neu- trino mass. Presumably created in the early universe in numbers comparable to photons, neutrinos with a mass of only a few eV would contribute a significant 2 fraction of the closure density.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter No. 94
    DNP Newsletter No. 94 MAY 1993 TO: Members of the Division of Nuclear Physics, APS FROM: Virginia R. Brown, LLNL - Secretary-Treasurer, DNP • 9 July 1993- Election Ballot for ACCOMPANYING THIS NEWSLETTER DNP Div. Councilor (See item 2). : • 9 July 1993- Nomination Ballot for • A ballot for the nomination of DNP DNP Elections (See item 3). Officers and Executive Committee. • 9 July 1993- Ballot for DNP New Bylaws (See item 4). • A ballot for voting for a second • 1 Sept. 1993-Nominations for 1994 DNP Division Councilor. Dissertation Award (See item 5). • A ballot for the Adoption of the • 1 Sept. 1993-Nominations for 1994 New DNP Bylaws. Bonner Prize (See item 6). • "New" DNP Bylaws. • 17 Sept. 1993-Last day for Asilomar "Special" Preregistration rates and last day for lodging 20-23 OCTOBER DNP MEETING, reservations at the Asilomar ASILOMAR, CA conference grounds. • A pre-registration form which includes workshops and banquet. • A housing form. 1. DNP COMMITTEES Future Deadlines Executive Committee Noemie Benczer-Koller, Rutgers 1993-94 Univ., Chair (1994) DNP Carl B. Dover, BNL, Vice-Chair (1994) Wick C. Haxton, Univ. of • 18 June 1993- Contributed Washington, Past-Chair (1994) Abstracts for the Asilomar Fall Meeting (See item 9). • 25 June 1993 - User Group Virginia R. Brown, LLNL, Secretary- Deadline in Order to Appear in Treasurer (1994) the October Bulletin (See item 9). Gerald T. Garvey, LANL, Division Councilor (December, 1993) Stephen E. Koonin, Caltech, Division S. Kowalski, MIT Councilor (December, 1995) R. E. Pollock, Indiana Univ. Lawrence S. Cardman, CEBAF (1994) 1995 Bonner Prize Committee Walter Henning, ANL (1994) Robert D.
    [Show full text]
  • NSAC Subcommittee Membership List
    NSAC Long Range Plan Working Group 2014 Membership List Ani Aprahamian Abhay Deshpande Donald Geesaman (Chair) Department of Physics Physics & Astronomy Physics Division University of Notre Dame SUNY Stony Brook Argonne National Laboratory Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 Stony Brook, NY 11794 9700 South Cass Avenue 219-631-5952 631-632-8109 Argonne, IL 60439 [email protected] [email protected] 630-252-4059 [email protected] Robert Atcher Rolf Ent Science Programs Office, Thomas Jefferson National Geoffrey Greene Los Alamos National Laboratory Accelerator Facility Physics Department Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 Hall C University of Tennessee 505-663-5596 12000 Jefferson Avenue 515 Nielson Building [email protected] Newport News, VA 23606 Knoxville, TN 37996 757-269-7373 865-974-3342 Helen Caines [email protected] [email protected] Department of Physics Yale University Renee Fatemi John Hardy 215 Prospect Street Department of Physics & Cyclotron Institute New Haven, CT 06511 Astronomy Texas A&M University 203-432-5831 University of Kentucky College Station, TX 77843 [email protected] Lexington, KY 40506 979-845-1411 859-257-2664 [email protected] Gordon Cates [email protected] Department of Physics Karsten Heeger University of Virginia Bradley Filippone Department of Physics P. O. Box 400714 Physics Department Yale University McCormick Road California Institute of Technology WNSL 206/JWG 515 Charlottesville, VA 22903 Pasadena, CA 92225 New Haven, CT 06520 434-924-4790 626-395-4517 203-432-3088 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Stuart J. Freedman
    Stuart Jay Freedman 1944–2012 A Biographical Memoir by R. G. Hamish Robertson ©2014 National Academy of Sciences. Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. STUART JAY FREEDMAN January 13, 1944–November 10, 2012 Elected to the NAS, 2001 Stuart J. Freedman was an experimental physicist with a broad sweep of talents and interests that centered on nuclear physics but also spanned particle physics, quantum mechanics, astrophysics, and cosmology. As a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley, he carried out a crucial test of the Einstein-Podolsky- Rosen (EPR) argument that quantum mechanics was an incomplete theory; Stuart showed that EPR’s postulated local hidden variables did not explain experimental data, whereas quantum mechanics did. Stuart was an early and continuous leader in the search for neutrino oscilla- tions, and in the KamLAND project he determined which of several possible solutions the correct one was. He also was noted for several instances in which an incorrect By R. G. Hamish Robertson result with major implications was neutralized. Perhaps the most famous case involved the 17-keV neutrino. Stuart was born in Hollywood, CA—the son of David Freedman, an architect, and Anne (Sklar) Freedman—and attended schools in Beverlywood. By all accounts he was a strong student and a “normal” teenager, with a penchant for ruffling establishment feathers whenever possible. His occasional minor run-ins with the law and hilarious interactions with bureaucracies became the stuff of good stories later in life.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Probes of Neutrino Mass
    Nuclear Physics B Proceed- ings Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplement 00 (2018) 1–6 Supple- ment Direct probes of neutrino mass R. G. Hamish Robertson Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics and Dept. of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA Abstract The discovery of neutrino oscillations has shown that neutrinos, in contradiction to a prediction of the minimal standard model, have mass. Oscillations do not yield a value for the mass, but do set a lower limit of 0.02 eV on the average of the 3 known eigenmasses. Moreover, they make it possible to determine or limit all 3 masses from measurements of electron-flavor neutrinos in beta decay. The present upper limit from such measurements is 2 eV. We review the status of laboratory work toward closing the remaining window between 2 and 0.02 eV, and measuring the mass. Keywords: Neutrino mass, beta decay, tritium, electron spectroscopy 1. Introduction conservation in the weak interaction in 1956 [6] and the measurement of the helicity of the neutrino in 1958 [7] The mass of the neutrino has been a topic of specula- made plausible the idea that the neutrino was massless, tion and research since the theory of beta decay was for- and massless neutrinos were subsequently built into the mulated by Fermi [1]. Neutrino mass affects the shape standard model. A decade-long hiatus in searches for of the beta spectrum, and even with the limited data neutrino mass followed. A second kind of neutrino, available at the time, Fermi was able to conclude that the muon neutrino, was discovered in 1962 [8], and the mass of the neutrino must be “either zero, or in any a third, the tau neutrino, was found to exist in 1975 case very small, in comparison to the mass of the elec- [9].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1208.5723V1 [Astro-Ph.SR] 28 Aug 2012 Key Words Solar Neutrinos, Neutrino Oscillations, Solar Models, Helioseismol
    1 Solar Neutrinos: Status and Prospects W. C. Haxton Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, and Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley CA 94720-7300 R. G. Hamish Robertson Department of Physics, University of Washington, and Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Seattle, WA 98195 Aldo M. Serenelli Instituto de Ciencias del Espacio (CSIC-IEEC), Facultad de Ciencias, Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain and Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl Schwarzschild Str. 1, Garching, D-85471, Germany arXiv:1208.5723v1 [astro-ph.SR] 28 Aug 2012 Key Words solar neutrinos, neutrino oscillations, solar models, helioseismol- ogy, nuclear astrophysics, metal abundances Abstract We describe the current status of solar neutrino measurements and of the theory { both neutrino physics and solar astrophysics { employed in interpreting measurements. Im- portant recent developments include Super-Kamiokande's determination of the ν e elastic − scattering rate for 8B neutrinos to 3%; the latest SNO global analysis in which the inclusion of 2 low-energy data from SNO I and II significantly narrowed the range of allowed values for the 7 neutrino mixing angle θ12; Borexino results for both the Be and pep neutrino fluxes, the first direct measurements constraining the rate of ppI and ppII burning in the Sun; global reanalyses of solar neutrino data that take into account new reactor results on θ13; a new decadal evalua- tion of the nuclear physics of the pp chain and CNO cycle defining best
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Years of Solar Neutrinos Since the First SNO Result
    20 years of Solar Neutrinos since the first SNO result Art McDonald, Gray Chair in Particle Astrophysics, Emeritus Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada For the SNO Collaboration Pioneers of Solar Neutrino Physics: Davis, Bahcall, Pontecorvo & Gribov 1968: Gribov and Pontecorvo suggest flavor 1968: Davis’ Measurements of electron neutrinos with change (oscillation) of Chlorine-based detector show 3 times fewer than electron neutrinos to muon Bahcall’s calculations. neutrinos as a possible Ray Davis: Nobel Laureate 2002 reason. Kamiokande, 1989 on 1968 on 2001 on 1992 on 1984: Herb Chen proposes heavy water to search for direct evidence of flavor transformation for neutrinos from 8B decay in the Sun. Electron neutrinos and all active neutrinos are measured separately to show flavor change independent of solar model calculations. SNO collaboration is created with Chen and George Ewan as Spokesmen. Unique Signatures in SNO (D2O) (1 in 6400 molecules in ordinary water are D2O. We used >99.75% D2O) Electron Neutrinos (CC) - νe+d → e +p+p Ethresh = 1.4 MeV Equal Sensitivity All Types (NC) νx+d → νx+n+p Ethresh = 2.2 MeV 3 ways to detect neutrons Comparing these two reactions tells if electron neutrinos have changed their type. Radioactivity must be carefully controlled because gamma rays can also break apart deuterium and produce a free neutron. Unique Signatures in SNO (D2O) (1 in 6400 molecules in ordinary water are D2O. We used >99.75% D2O) Electron Neutrinos (CC) - νe+d → e +p+p Ethresh = 1.4 MeV Equal Sensitivity All Types (NC) νx+d → νx+n+p Ethresh = 2.2 MeV 3 ways to detect neutrons Comparing these two reactions tells if electron neutrinos have changed their type.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the Division of Nuclear Physics, APS FROM: Benjamin F
    TO: Members of the Division of Nuclear Physics, APS FROM: Benjamin F. Gibson, LANL – Secretary-Treasurer, DNP ACCOMPANYING THIS NEWSLETTER: Charles Glashausser, Rutgers, Vice Chair (2000) • APS Spring Meeting DNP Symposia Walter F. Henning, ANL, Past Chair (2000) • DNP Fall Meeting Speaker Nomination Form Benjamin F. Gibson, LANL, Secretary-Treasurer (2000) J. Dirk Walecka, College of William & Mary Divisional Councilor (December 2001) Christopher R. Gould, N. Carolina State Univ. (2000) Barry R. Holstein, U Mass (2001) Brian Serot, Indiana U (2000) T. James M. Symons, LBNL (2000) Robert E. Tribble, Texas A&M (2001) Future Deadlines Michael C. T. Wiescher, Notre Dame (2001) • 1 April 2000 — APS Fellowship Nominations • 4 May 2000 — Speaker Nominations for Fall Meeting 2. CALL FOR DNP COMMITTEE SUGGESTIONS • 1 July 2000 — Nominations for Bonner Prize • 1 July 2000 — Nominations for Bethe Prize The terms of some of the members of the following DNP committees • 1 July 2000 — Nominations for Dissertation Award expire in April 2000: Bethe, Bonner, Fellowship, Nominating, Home Page, and Education. Suggestions from the DNP membership for new members of these committees for 2000 are welcome and should be sent WWW Home Page for DNP - “http://www.phy.anl.gov/dnp/”. to Hamish Robertson. A list of committee members for 2000 will be published in the August newsletter. A worldwide web home page for the Division of Nuclear Physics is currently available at “http://www.phy.anl.gov/dnp/”. Information of interest to DNP members, such as current NP topics, deadlines for Inside . meetings, prizes, nomination forms, special announcements, and useful links are listed there.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuart Freedman
    2010 Decadal Review of NlNuclear Phys ics An Assessment and Outlook for Nuclear Physics Stuart J. Freedman, University of California, Berkeley, Chair Cherry Murray, Harvard University Ani Aprahamian, University of Notre Dame, Vice Chair Witold Nazarewicz, University of Tennessee Ricardo Alarcon, Arizona State University Konstantinos Orginos, College of William and Mary Gordon A. Baym, University of Illinois Krishna Rajagopal, MIT Elizabeth Beise, University of Maryland RGR.G. Hamish Robertson, University of Washington Richard F. Casten, Yale University Thomas J. Ruth, TRIUMF Jolie A. Cizewski, Rutgers Hendrik Schatz, National Superconducting Cyclotron Anna Hayes‐Sterbenz, Los Alamos National Laboratory Laboratory Roy J. Holt, Argonne National Laboratory Robert E. Tribble, Texas A&M University Karlheinz Langanke, GSI Helmholtz William A. Zajc, Columbia University Latest in the Series 1972 1986 1999 2012 100 years of Nuclear Physics Building the foundation for the future NP2010 Statement of Task 2007 NSAC Long Range Plan A five year plan organidized and formulated by the community through NSAC, advising DOE & NSF on science & development priorities in Nuclear Physics! Selecting organizing & writing committees Town meetings for sub‐communities NSAC meeting for entire community Write‐up of report Presentation of report to NSAC Presentation of report to agencies User Facilities CEBAF ATLAS RHIC • 4 National User Facilities • Approximately 40% of users are from foreign institutions • After completion FRIB will be a major National NSCL
    [Show full text]