Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report, 2005 to 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report, 2005 to 2013 Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report, 2005 to 2013 2014 ESRD/Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report, 2005 to 2013 Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report 2005 to 2013 Andrea McGregor Project Biologist Fisheries Management Branch Waterways-Lac La Biche Area 2014 Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report Page i 2005 to 2013 © 2014 Government of Alberta ESRD/Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report, 2005 to 2013 Executive Summary The Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program was initiated in 2005 as a six-part program with management actions targeting commercial and recreational fishery reductions, walleye stocking, Double-crested Cormorant control, protection of critical fish areas, and monitoring. The social objective of the program was to “improve fishing opportunities for future generations” by restoring the lake to historical conditions. The ecological objectives were to recover the walleye population and improve the overall size structure of the fish community. In 2005, cormorant culling was introduced to complement egg oiling in order to achieve a reduction in the number of birds breeding in the Lac La Biche area. Restrictions on commercial and recreational harvest were introduced in 2006, and more than 200 million walleye fry, along with fingerlings and adult walleye, were stocked between 2006 and 2011. Fall walleye index netting surveys and annual monitoring of cormorants and co-nesting species were conducted in order to assess the ecological responses to management actions. Walleye stocking was successful, increasing the catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) of catchable sized walleye (>350 mm TL) in a 10-panel net from 0.09 fish·100m-2·24h-1 in 2005 to 14.27 fish·100m-2·24h-1 in 2013. The CPUE for all walleye peaked at 18.35 fish·100m-2·24h-1 in 2011, declining in 2012 and 2013 when annual walleye stocking was stopped. Generally, abundance increased for predator and omnivore fish species, and decreased for prey groups. Changes in the population size structure for yellow perch and lake whitefish suggest an increase in the abundance of large fish in 2013 compared to 2005, as well as a notable spikes in recruitment in 2013. Cisco and white suckers also showed recruitment spikes in 2013, but overall, cisco abundance remains similar to 2005 and sucker abundance is still notably lower. northern pike size structure was consistent between years, generally with more fish at all sizes; However, pike CPUE declined approximately 40% from 2012 to 2013. Management actions caused an 83% decrease in nesting cormorants between 2003 and 2013. Over the ten years of active cormorant management, 30,444 nests were sterilized through egg oiling and 8,143 birds (mostly adults) were culled. Since 2010, the number of Indian and Metis domestic netting licenses has approximately doubled. Commercial lake whitefish fisheries have failed to achieve their quota, generally being shut down early for exceeding bycatch tolerances for pike and walleye. Determining the success of the restoration program will require a holistic approach to long-term monitoring of the aquatic ecosystem and the disturbances that threaten its stability. Annual monitoring of the fisheries (FWIN) is recommended to maintain the long-term dataset that will allow assessment of changes in species composition and abundance during the restoration process. In addition, cormorants and their co-nesting species should be monitored to document changes in population size or productivity as the fishery changes. Cormorant management will also likely be required for an indefinite amount of time as the abundant yellow perch population continues to provide a seasonal forage base to support successful breeding of large populations of waterbirds. One of the largest threats to program success moving forward is overharvest of the walleye population during a critical recovery period. Currently, the walleye population is classified as collapsed based on the criteria in Alberta’s Walleye Recovery Plan (Berry 1995). 2014 Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report Page ii 2005 to 2013 © 2014 Government of Alberta ESRD/Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report, 2005 to 2013 Given this classification the proposed management action is to maintain a catch and release fishery. Increased fishing mortality from domestic and commercial harvest and illegal recreational harvest poses a very serious threat to the continued recovery of the walleye population. Future research should focus on quantifying mortality associated with the commercial, domestic, and recreational harvest, assessing the success of different genetic strains of walleye and partnering with the Lac La Biche County to monitor water quality, lake productivity, and benthic invertebrate productivity. 2014 Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report Page iii 2005 to 2013 © 2014 Government of Alberta ESRD/Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report, 2005 to 2013 Permission to Quote This report contains preliminary information and interpretations that might be subject to future revisions. Persons who wish to quote from this report, cite it in a bibliography, or use it in any other form must first obtain permission from: Executive Director, LAR Operations Division, Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development; or the author. Keywords: Cormorant, Walleye, FWIN, Lac la Biche Author contact information: Andrea McGregor ([email protected]) Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, Twin Atria Building, Main Floor, 4999 – 98 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6B 2X3. Suggested citation: McGregor, A.M. 2014. Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report, 2005 to 2013. Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, Edmonton, Alberta. 2014 Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report Page iv 2005 to 2013 © 2014 Government of Alberta ESRD/Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report, 2005 to 2013 Acknowledgments I thank C. Davis for his foresight in initiating this research and his mentorship over our 10 years working together. I thank all of the fisheries staff from the Lac la Biche/Waterways area for their help with the fieldwork, especially staff working in the Lac La Biche office. I also thank D. Latty, A. Pruden-Beniuk, C. Dockrill, J. Walker, J. Sloychuk and P. MacMahon for their review of this report. 2014 Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report Page v 2005 to 2013 © 2014 Government of Alberta ESRD/Lac La Biche Fisheries Restoration Program Summary Report, 2005 to 2013 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... ii Permission to Quote ..................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................... v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................. viii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. ix List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................................ x Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area .................................................................................................................................................... 1 General .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Double-crested cormorant populations ................................................................................................. 2 Lac La Biche Fisheries .......................................................................................................................... 2 Restoration Program Management Actions ................................................................................................... 3 Commercial fishery reductions ............................................................................................................. 3 Sportfishing reductions ......................................................................................................................... 3 Walleye stocking ................................................................................................................................... 3 Cormorant control ................................................................................................................................. 4 Protection of critical fish areas .............................................................................................................. 4 Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Restoration Program Management Results ..................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • University of Alberta
    University of Alberta Genetic Population Structure of Walleye (Sander vitreus) in Northern Alberta and Application to Species Management by Lindsey Alison Burke A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Systematics and Evolution Biological Sciences ©Lindsey Alison Burke Fall 2010 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-62977-2 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-62977-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Status of the Sport Fishery for Walleye at Pigeon Lake, 1999. B. Patterson Conducted As Part of the Alberta
    Assessment of the Status of the Sport Fishery for Walleye at Pigeon Lake, 1999. B. Patterson Conducted as part of the Alberta Conservation Associations Sportfisheries Monitoring Program, NE Region April, 2000 ABSTRACT To recover or maintain Alberta's walleye fisheries, a new walleye management strategy was implemented in 1996. In 1996, the walleye fishery at Pigeon Lake was classified as a collapsed/stocked walleye fishery and a zero (0) daily bag limit was implemented. In order to assess the status of the walleye fishery, a creel survey was conducted during May to August 1999. During the 1999 survey, the number of anglers was estimated at 3,420. The total angling effort was low at 1.1 hours / ha. The sport fishery reported releasing 602 walleye (0.30 walleye released / hour). Two walleye were illegally harvested. Historical information indicates that the walleye population in Pigeon Lake was marginal. The walleye fishery was extirpated in the 1960s. Stocking efforts between 1979 and 1984 failed to re-establish the walleye fishery. More than 18.4 million walleye fry and fingerlings were stocked between 1994 and 1999. This effort seems to have produced a marginal population. Based on the criteria used to classify walleye stocks in Alberta, the status of the walleye population in Pigeon Lake remains collapsed. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The creel survey attendants at Pigeon Lake, Mark Feldberg, Les Harris, Layla Neufeld and John Tchir, deserve full credit for the success of this study. Their dedication to the collection of creel and test fishery data is commendable. The hospitality of Doug Pilkington and the staff of Pigeon Lake Provincial Park is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Lake Health Assessment FINAL
    Cold Lake Health Assessment A study under the Regional Waterline Strategy and Governance Model Development Project Prepared for: Town of Bonnyville, City of Cold Lake, and Municipal District of Bonnyville Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Project No.: 113929476 FINAL April 7, 2017 Sign-off Sheet This document entitled Cold Lake Health Assessment was prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. This document entitled Cold Lake Health Assessment was prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. (“Stantec”) for the account of the Partnership (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by L. Karoliina Munter, M.Sc., P.Biol. Co-authors: Seifu Guangul, Ph.D., P.Eng, D.WRE Nick De Carlo, B.Sc., P.Biol., QWSP Stuart Morrison, Dip. B.Sc. Greg Schatz, M.Sc., P.Biol Reviewed by John Orwin, Ph.D., P.Geo.
    [Show full text]
  • RURAL ECONOMY Ciecnmiiuationofsiishiaig Activity Uthern All
    RURAL ECONOMY ciEcnmiIuationofsIishiaig Activity uthern All W Adamowicz, P. BoxaIl, D. Watson and T PLtcrs I I Project Report 92-01 PROJECT REPORT Departmnt of Rural [conom F It R \ ,r u1tur o A Socio-Economic Evaluation of Sportsfishing Activity in Southern Alberta W. Adamowicz, P. Boxall, D. Watson and T. Peters Project Report 92-01 The authors are Associate Professor, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton; Forest Economist, Forestry Canada, Edmonton; Research Associate, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton and Research Associate, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton. A Socio-Economic Evaluation of Sportsfishing Activity in Southern Alberta Interim Project Report INTROI)UCTION Recreational fishing is one of the most important recreational activities in Alberta. The report on Sports Fishing in Alberta, 1985, states that over 340,000 angling licences were purchased in the province and the total population of anglers exceeded 430,000. Approximately 5.4 million angler days were spent in Alberta and over $130 million was spent on fishing related activities. Clearly, sportsfishing is an important recreational activity and the fishery resource is the source of significant social benefits. A National Angler Survey is conducted every five years. However, the results of this survey are broad and aggregate in nature insofar that they do not address issues about specific sites. It is the purpose of this study to examine in detail the characteristics of anglers, and angling site choices, in the Southern region of Alberta. Fish and Wildlife agencies have collected considerable amounts of bio-physical information on fish habitat, water quality, biology and ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophic State of Alberta Lakes Based on Average Total Phosphorus
    Created Feb 2013 TROPHIC STATE OF ALBERTA LAKES Based On Average (May-October) Total Phosphorus Concentrations Total Phosphorus (µg/L) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 * Adamson Lake Alix Lake * Amisk Lake * Angling Lake Oligotrophic * ‡ Antler Lake Arm Lake (Low Productivity) * Astotin Lake (<10 µg/L) * ‡ Athabasca (Lake) - Off Delta Baptiste Lake - North Basin Baptiste Lake - South Basin * ‡ Bare Creek Res. Mesotrophic * ‡ Barrier Lake ‡ Battle Lake (Moderate Productivity) * † Battle River Res. (Forestburg) (10 - 35 µg/L) Beartrap Lake Beauvais Lake Beaver Lake * Bellevue Lake Eutrophic * † Big Lake - East Basin * † Big Lake - West Basin (High Productivity) * Blackfalds Lake (35 - 100 µg/L) * † Blackmud Lake * ‡ Blood Indian Res. Bluet (South Garnier Lake) ‡ Bonnie Lake Hypereutrophic † Borden Lake * ‡ Bourque Lake (Very High Productivity) ‡ Buck Lake (>100 µg/L) Buffalo Lake - Main Basin Buffalo Lake - Secondary Bay * † Buffalo Lake (By Boyle) † Burntstick Lake Calling Lake * † Capt Eyre Lake † Cardinal Lake * ‡ Carolside Res. - Berry Creek Res. † Chain Lakes Res. - North Basin † Chain Lakes Res.- South Basin Chestermere Lake * † Chickakoo Lake * † Chickenhill Lake * Chin Coulee Res. * Clairmont Lake Clear (Barns) Lake Clear Lake ‡ Coal Lake * ‡ Cold Lake - English Bay ‡ Cold Lake - West Side ‡ Cooking Lake † Cow Lake * Crawling Valley Res. Crimson Lake Crowsnest Lake * † Cutbank Lake Dillberry Lake * Driedmeat Lake ‡ Eagle Lake ‡ Elbow Lake Elkwater Lake Ethel Lake * Fawcett Lake * † Fickle Lake * † Figure Eight Lake * Fishing Lake * Flyingshot Lake * Fork Lake * ‡ Fox Lake Res. Frog Lake † Garner Lake Garnier Lake (North) * George Lake * † Ghost Res. - Inside Bay * † Ghost Res. - Inside Breakwater ‡ Ghost Res. - Near Cochrane * Gleniffer Lake (Dickson Res.) * † Glenmore Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring for Invasive Mussels in Alberta’S Irrigation Infrastructure: 2017 Report
    Monitoring for Invasive Mussels in Alberta’s Irrigation Infrastructure: 2017 Report Alberta Agriculture and Forestry Water Quality Section Outlet of Sauder Reservoir January 2018 Introduction and Summary The Government of Alberta (GOA) is committed to protecting the province against aquatic invasive species (AIS), due to their negative ecological and economic effects. Invasive zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and quagga mussels (Dreissena bugensis) are of prominent concern, as these dreissenid mussels attach to any solid submerged surface and rapidly multiply due to their high reproductive rates. They are also very difficult to contain and eradicate once established. Additionally, they are spreading closer to Alberta’s borders. Alberta’s irrigation industry contributes $3.6 billion to the provincial gross domestic product (GDP). Specifically, it contributes about 20% of the provincial agri-food sector GDP on 4.7% of the province’s cultivated land base (Paterson Earth & Water Consulting 2015). Alberta’s irrigation industry includes thirteen irrigation districts that supply water to more than 570,000 ha of farmland through infrastructure valued at $3.6 billion. This infrastructure includes 57 irrigation reservoirs along with 3,491 km of canals and 4,102 km of pipelines (ARD 2014; AF 2017). The irrigation conveyance system provides water to irrigators, municipalities, industries, and wetlands, while the reservoirs support recreational activities such as boating and fishing and provide habitat to fish and waterfowl. Invasive mussels are a concern to the irrigation industry as infestations will have a significant negative effect on water infrastructure and conveyance works due to their ability to completely clog pipelines and damage raw-water treatment systems and intakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Oil Resources Limited Cold Lake Expansion Project Volume 2 – Environmental Impact Assessment March 2016
    Imperial Oil Resources Limited Cold Lake Expansion Project Volume 2 – Environmental Impact Assessment March 2016 SECTION 16.0 – HISTORICAL RESOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 16.0 HISTORICAL RESOURCES ......................................................................................16 -1 16.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................16 -1 16.1.1 Terminology .....................................................................................16 -2 16.2 Study Area ......................................................................................................16 -3 16.2.1 Spatial Boundaries ...........................................................................16 -3 16.2.2 Temporal Boundaries .......................................................................16 -3 16.3 Assessment Approach ....................................................................................16 -3 16.3.1 Issues ...............................................................................................16 -5 16.3.2 Assessment Criteria .........................................................................16 -5 16.3.3 Constraints Planning ........................................................................16 -6 16.4 Methods ..........................................................................................................16 -6 16.4.1 Record Review Data Sources ...........................................................16 -7 16.4.2 Evaluation of Historical Resource
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Hedysarum Boreale Complex
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1969-05-01 A revision of the hedysarum boreale complex Terry Edwin Northstrom Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Northstrom, Terry Edwin, "A revision of the hedysarum boreale complex" (1969). Theses and Dissertations. 8102. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/8102 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE GENUS HEDYSARUM IN NORTH AMERICA A Dissertation Presented to the Department of Botany Brigham Young University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy by Terry Edwin Northstrom August 1974 This dissertation by Terry Edwin Northstrom, is accepted in its present form by the Department of Botany of Brigham Young University as satisfying the disserta- tion requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. August 16, 1974 Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My cordial appreciation is expressed to Dr. Stanley L. Welsh, Brigham Young University, under whose supervision this study was carried out. Special thanks are given to Mrs. Kay Thorne for her help in preparing the illustration, Jim Allen for his help with the scanning electron microscopy and to the curators of the following herbaria who generously
    [Show full text]
  • Vampires in the Basement: Lessons About Species-At-Risk, Exotic Invasions, and Ecological Restoration from the Wise Fishes of Jasper and Willmore
    Vampires in the Basement: Lessons about species-at-risk, exotic invasions, and ecological restoration from the wise fishes of Jasper and Willmore Dr. Michael Sullivan, Alberta Cooperative Conservation Research Unit What have our travels in the mountains taught us? 1) Ecosystems are complex 2) “Species-at-Risk” usually mean “Systems-at-Risk” 3) Ecosystem changes may be irreversible Learn to appreciate change Chaba River area, JNP March 2007 Vampires in the Basement Creatures that are around, but quite rare …until some evil thing occurs upstairs, and the vampires come out of the basement, and life as we know it is changed forever Hardscrabble Creek Azure Lake Whitetail deer “Vampires” and “Invasives” becoming important in our understanding of Nature Whitetails are the “Vampires in the Basement” for JNP and Willmore caribou Tonquin Valley area, Summer 2007 Mark Bradley photo Queen Elizabeth Range, JNP Feb 2009 Rock Lake area (Hinton) Nov 2008 Clearcuts (or burns) alter habitat (old-growth becomes young) Young forest = increased “invasive” deer, that increase wolves Wolves enjoy deer, but love caribou Caribou decline Starlight Range, JNP July 2008 Clearcuts Grande Cache (1000’s of ’em) Clearcuts (1000’s of ’em) Caribou range (A La Peche Herd) Hinton 50 km (30 miles) JNP (1/2 day wolf travel) Jasper Heraclitus (575 BC): You cannot step in the same river twice If the ecosystem has changed, can we restore a single species? Mowitch Creek, JNP July 2008 The decline of a charismatic species is usually (always?) symptomatic of a complex ecosystem
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver River Watershed Alliance
    Beaver River Watershed Alliance About Us and Our Projects “The Little Watershed That Can…” March 15, 2011 Agri-Environmental Partnerships of Alberta AgForum, Nisku , AB Overview • BRiWthdBeaver River Watershed - GhGeography • Beaver River Watershed Alliance • BRWA Guiding Principles • BRWA Projects and Activities • Current BRWA Partnerships Beaver River Watershed - AB Beaver River Basin Cold Lake Edmonton Calgary Beaver River Watershed - Profile • Watershed area: ~ 22,000 km2 • Population: ~38,000 •Majjy(,)or urban centres: Bonnyville (5,600) and Cold Lake (12,000) • 4 counties, 4 Summer Villages, 1 MD, 1 Town, 1 City, 1 Village, 14 Hamlets • 3 Métis Settlements and 4 First Nation Reserves • Beaver River length: 491km (307 mi) • Originates from Beaver Lake near the town of Lac La Biche and extends eastward towar ds Sas kthkatchewan emp titying itinto the Hudson’s Bay at Churchill. • Average discharge: 653,000,000 m3/year (at AB/SK border) • Main tributaries: • Amisk (Little Beaver) River • 2000+ lakes including lakes within the Lakeland • Moose Lake River Provincial Recreation Area (e.g. Touchwood, • Sand River Pinehurst, Seibert, Spencer) while the lower part • Main economic activities include: includes lakes within the Cold Lake Air Weapons • Agriculture Range (e.g. Primrose Lake) • Oil and Gas • 12 Water Stewardship Groups, some with • Recreation • Society Status and others without Beaver River Watershed Alliance • The BRWA is a Watershed Planning and Advisory Council (WPAC) and an independent standing committee of the Lakeland Industry & Community Association (LICA) • Our main purpose is to develop an Integrated Watershed MtPlManagement Plan – This is accomplished in part by the completion of a State of the Watershed Report, which has been completed for the lower part of the basin – Cold Lake Beaver River State of the Watershed Report (()2006) • We, along with nine other provincial WPACs, are mandated by the Government of Alberta to carry out the three goals of Water for Life: Alberta ’ s Strategy for Sustainability (2003): 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Fishing Licence Conditions for 2020-2021
    Domestic Fishing Licence Conditions for 2020-2021 This document and the rules within are effective April 1, 2020 The holder of a free-of-charge domestic fishing license can harvest fish for food for themselves and members of their immediate household from eligible waters listed below, using a gill net or rod and reel. Alberta's sportfishing rules (seasons, sizes and bag limits of fish) apply to all waterbodies that are not listed in the Domestic Fishing Licence Conditions (attachment to Domestic Fishing Licence). Fishing with gill nets Gill nets can be lawfully set by licenced users (i.e., First Nations people, Métis harvesters, and researchers). Nets must be visibly marked at each end with a 1 metre stake or spar buoy bearing the applicable licence number. See General and Specific rules for gillnetting below. If the nets are not marked, or the presence of a net seems suspicious (for example, set during a closed season), please call your local Fish and Wildlife Office or Report A Poacher at 1-800-642-3800. Specific rules for gillnetting See list and maps of waterbodies below with specific rules for gillnetting. If a waterbody is not identified on the list below, it is not eligible for gillnetting under the authority of a Domestic Fishing Licence. General rules for gillnetting 1. No gillnetting in waters closed to all fishing. 2. No spring closure unless specified for a lake or river. See table starting on page 3. 3. A single gill net of no more than 95 metres (104 yards) in length of the specified minimum mesh size (not less than or NLT) listed for the lake or river.
    [Show full text]
  • Primrose Lake Air Weapons Range II, Joseph Bighead Inquiry / Buffalo
    INDIAN CLAIMS COMMISSION PRIMROSE LAKE AIR WEAPONS RANGE REPORT II JOSEPH BIGHEAD FIRST NATION INQUIRY BUFFALO RIVER FIRST NATION INQUIRY WATERHEN LAKE FIRST NATION INQUIRY FLYING DUST FIRST NATION INQUIRY PANEL Commissioner Daniel J. Bellegarde Commissioner P.E. James Prentice, QC COUNSEL For the Buffalo River, Joseph Bighead, and Waterhen Lake First Nations James D. Jodouin / Douglas J. Kovatch For the Flying Dust First Nation John R. Beckman, QC For the Government of Canada Bruce Becker / Maureen Parkes To the Indian Claims Commission Robert F. Reid, QC / Kim Fullerton Ron Maurice / Diana Belevsky September 1995 CONTENTS PART I INTRODUCTION 1 PART II THE INQUIRIES 3 THE TREATIES 3 Treaty 6 3 Treaty 10 5 TRADITIONAL USE OF THE RANGE LANDS 6 Map 1 Claim Area 8 FUR CONSERVATION AREAS 9 EXCLUSION FROM THE RANGE 10 COMPENSATION 11 PART III ISSUES 13 PART IV ANALYSIS 18 1 BREACH OF TREATY 18 The Right at Issue 18 The "Test" for Breach of Treaty from the PLAWR Report 18 Were the Treaties Breached? 20 2 BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY 23 Summary of Arguments 23 Breach of Treaty 26 Compensation for the Reduction in Food Harvesting 26 Compensation for Commercial Losses 30 PART V CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 34 RECOMMENDATION 1 34 RECOMMENDATION 2 34 APPENDICES A The Joseph Bighead First Nation Inquiry 36 B The Buffalo River First Nation Inquiry 37 C The Waterhen Lake First Nation Inquiry 38 D The Flying Dust First Nation Inquiry 39 E The Record of the Inquiries 40 PART I INTRODUCTION In 1954, the Government of Canada took up a 4490-square-mile parcel of land in northern Alberta and Saskatchewan, roughly centred on Primrose Lake, for an air force bombing and gunnery range.
    [Show full text]