DOCSLIB.ORG

Using Geomembrane Liners to Reduce Seepage Through the Base of Tailings Ponds—A Review and a Framework for Design Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Using Geomembrane Liners to Reduce Seepage Through the Base of Tailings Ponds—A Review and a Framework for Design Guidelines geosciences Review Using Geomembrane Liners to Reduce Seepage through the Base of Tailings Ponds—A Review and a Framework for Design Guidelines Anne Tuomela 1,* , Anna-Kaisa Ronkanen 2 , Pekka M. Rossi 2, Anssi Rauhala 1 , Harri Haapasalo 3 and Kauko Kujala 2 1 Structures and Construction Technology, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4300, 90014 Oulu, Finland; anssi.rauhala@oulu.fi 2 Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4300, 90014 Oulu, Finland; anna-kaisa.ronkanen@oulu.fi (A.-K.R.); pekka.rossi@oulu.fi (P.M.R.); [email protected].fi (K.K.) 3 Industrial Engineering and Management, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4300, 90014 Oulu, Finland; harri.haapasalo@oulu.fi * Correspondence: anne.tuomela@oulu.fi; Tel.: +358-50342-6151 Abstract: Geomembranes are used worldwide as basin liners in tailings ponds to decrease the permeability of the foundation and prevent further transportation of harmful contaminants and contaminated water. However, leakage into the environment and damage to the geomembrane have been reported. This paper reviews available literature and recommendations on geomembrane structures for use as a basal liner in tailings ponds, and presents a framework to achieve early Citation: Tuomela, A.; Ronkanen, involvement and an integrated approach to geomembrane structure design. Cohesive planning A.-K.; Rossi, P.M.; Rauhala, A.; guidelines or legislative directions for such structures are currently lacking in many countries, which Haapasalo, H.; Kujala, K. Using often means that the structure guidelines for groundwater protection or landfill are applied when Geomembrane Liners to Reduce designing tailings storage facilities (TSF). Basin structure is generally unique to each mine but, based Seepage through the Base of Tailings on the literature, in the majority of cases the structure has a single-composite liner. The type of Ponds—A Review and a Framework liner system used depends mainly on the material to be used on top of the structure, local hydraulic for Design Guidelines. Geosciences 2021, 11, 93. https://doi.org/ pressure gradient, and climate conditions. More practical information and scientific knowledge 10.3390/geosciences11020093 on the use of base liners in various cases are needed. A sustainable approach could be risk-based design, where the life cycle of the basin is taken into consideration. To this end, this paper proposes Academic Editors: geomembrane-lined tailings pond to be assessed as a stakeholder. Emphasis on this, early enough, Jesus Martinez-Frias and can ensure critical factors for tailings ponds to be considered from the outset in the design of mines Michael Campbell and reduces the environmental footprint of the mining industry. More holistic project management and early involvement and integration are recommended to improve construction quality during Received: 21 November 2020 the entire life cycle of the pond. In the long term, use of dry stacking or other alternative methods Accepted: 12 February 2021 should be encouraged, despite the higher costs for operators. Published: 17 February 2021 Keywords: geomembrane; tailings pond; basin liner; mine environment; site characterization; early Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral involvement and integration with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affil- iations. 1. Introduction The use of geosynthetics in industrial applications has become common since the 1970s [1]. There is huge potential to use these in different mine-related applications, Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. e.g., as geomembranes, plastic pipes, geotextiles, geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) and This article is an open access article reinforcements. The first major mining application was for lining process ponds and as distributed under the terms and partly impermeable basal structures for solar ponds at the Tenneco Minerals mines in Utah, conditions of the Creative Commons USA, and at a Sociedada Quimica y Minera mine in Northern Chile at the beginning of the Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// 1970s [2]. By the late 1970s, geomembranes were in general use in the basal structures of creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ heap leach pads, but they have only become widely been used in the basal liner structures 4.0/). of tailings ponds and waste rock dumps during the past 20 years [2–5]. Geosciences 2021, 11, 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020093 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/geosciences Geosciences 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 23 Geosciences 2021, 11, 93 2 of 22 of heap leach pads, but they have only become widely been used in the basal liner struc- tures of tailings ponds and waste rock dumps during the past 20 years [2–5]. ImpoundmentImpoundment of of tailings tailings generally generally poses poses on onee of of the the most most significant significant environmental environmental risksrisks associated associated with with mines mines [6], [6 ],with with the the risk risk closely closely linked linked to the to type the type and andquality quality of tail- of ings.tailings. Since Since each each mine mine is unique, is unique, the the physical physical and and chemical chemical quality quality of of the the tailings tailings varies. varies. TypicalTypical tailings tailings can can be be of of the the same same consistency consistency as as fine fine sand, sand, loamy loamy sand, sand, or or sandy sandy loam, loam, andand they they may may contain contain chemical chemical residues residues from from mineral mineral separation separation or or from from the the coagulants coagulants andand flocculants flocculants used used in inwater water separation, separation, e.g., e.g., [7]. [The7]. particle The particle properties properties differ differfrom those from ofthose natural of natural soils because soils because the grains the in grains tailings in tailings are jagged are jaggedin shape, in while shape, natural while naturalloam grains loam aregrains rounded. are rounded. High angularity, High angularity, grading grading characteristics characteristics and loose and loosedepositional depositional state stateof tail- of ingstailings have have direct direct effects effects on increasing on increasing compre compressibilityssibility compared compared with withnatural natural soils soils[8], but [8], alsobut alsoon susceptibility on susceptibility of liquefaction of liquefaction of tailings of tailings [9,10]. [9 ,10]. InIn conventional conventional disposal disposal systems, systems, tailings tailings are are dumped dumped in in ponds ponds as as a a slurry slurry with with a a solidssolids content content of of 20–40% 20–40% by by weight weight relative relative to to the the total total weight weight [11]. [11]. In In a a typical typical case, case, the the tailingstailings ponds ponds are locatedlocated withinwithin peatland peatland areas, areas, in in valleys, valleys, or onor on hillsides hillsides worldwide. worldwide. The Theobjective objective is to is utilizeto utilize natural natural soil soil layers layers with with low low water water permeability permeability (such(such as peat and and glacialglacial till) till) and locallocal soilsoil formationsformations to to reduce reduce the the risk risk of of pollution pollution to theto the environment. environment. The Themode mode of operation of operation of these of these ponds ponds is seepage is seepage of waterof water from from the the ponds ponds and and its its collection collection in ina nearbya nearby ditch ditch or or other other drainage drainage structure. structure. OneOne ofof the greatest environmental challenges challenges arisesarises with with tailings tailings that that create create an an acid acid environment environment [12,13]. [12,13]. Acid Acid is is formed formed through through the the oxidizationoxidization of of minerals minerals containing containing sulfur sulfur (e.g., (e.g., pyrite) pyrite) and and can can have have significant significant effects effects on on surfacesurface waters waters and and groundwater groundwater in in the the mine mine surroundings, surroundings, where where screening, screening, recovering recovering andand treating treating these these waters waters may may be be difficult difficult an andd expensive expensive [12]. [12]. Because Because releases releases of of acidic acidic minemine drainage drainage (AMD) (AMD) into into the the environment environment are are not not desirable, desirable, control control of of the the water water within within storedstored tailings tailings is is essential. essential. The The first first priority priority is is to to prevent prevent formation formation of of AMD AMD but but in in many many casescases an an impermeable impermeable basal basal layer layer may may need need to to be be constructed constructed (Figure (Figure 11).). FigureFigure 1. 1. AA conventional conventional way way of of disposing disposing of of mine mine tailings, tailings, as as a a slurry slurry in in a tailings pond. In In some some cases, cases, regulations regulations demanddemand use use of a geomembrane linerliner atat thethe pond pond base base to to achieve achieve low low permeability permeability and and keep keep seepage seepage waters waters away away from from the thesurrounding surrounding environment environment during during the the active active phase phase of disposal. of disposal. BecauseBecause awareness ofof environmentalenvironmental impacts impact hass has increased increased and and the legislationthe legislation on basal on basalstructures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From the Past to the Future of Landfill Engineering Through Case Histories
    Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Conference on Case Histories in (1998) - Fourth International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering 08 Mar 1998 - 15 Mar 1998 From the Past to the Future of Landfill Engineering Through Case Histories R. Kerry Rowe University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge Part of the Geotechnical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Rowe, R. Kerry, "From the Past to the Future of Landfill Engineering Through Case Histories" (1998). International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. 4. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge/4icchge/4icchge-session00/4 This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 145 Proceedings: Fourth International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering~ St. Louis, Missouri, March 9-12, 1998. FROM THE PAST TO THE FUTURE OF LANDFILL ENGINEERING THROUGH CASE HISTORIES R. Kerry Rowe Paper No. SOA-9 Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B9 AIISTRACT The advances in landfill engineering are outlined based on a number of case histories illustrating past problems, hydraulic performance of clay liners, diffusive transport through liners, hydraulic containment and clogging of leachate collection systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Bottom Liner System
    Engineering Report: Appendix C Volume 2 Alternative Bottom Liner System COWLITZ COUNTY HEADQUARTERS LANDFILL PROJECT COWLITZ COUNTY, WASHINGTON Alternative Bottom Liner System COWLITZ COUNTY HEADQUARTERS LANDFILL PROJECT COWLITZ COUNTY, WASHINGTON Prepared for COWLITZ COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS November 2012 Prepared by Thiel Engineering P.O. Box 1010 Oregon House, CA 95962 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Scope ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Alternative ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Description of GCLs ...................................................................................................................... 3 2 TECHNICAL EQUIVALENCY AND PERFORMANCE ................................................. 5 2.1 The Theory of Composite Liners with Reference to GCLs ....................................................... 5 2.2 Technical Equivalency Issues ....................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Hydraulic Issues ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landscaping at the Water's Edge
    LANDSCAPING/GARDENING/ECOLOGY No matter where you live in New Hampshire, the actions you take in your landscape can have far-reaching effects on water quality. Why? Because we are all connected to the water cycle and we all live in a watershed. A watershed is the LANDSCAPING land area that drains into a surface water body such as a lake, river, wetland or coastal estuary. at the Water’sAN ECOLOGICAL APPROACHEdge LANDSCAPING Landscaping at the Water’s Edge is a valuable resource for anyone concerned with the impact of his or her actions on the environment. This book brings together the collective expertise of many UNH Cooperative Extension specialists and educators and an independent landscape designer. Unlike many garden design books that are full of glitz and glamour but sorely lacking in substance, this affordable book addresses important ecological issues and empowers readers by giving an array of workable at the Water’s Edge solutions for real-world situations. ~Robin Sweetser, Concord Monitor columnist, garden writer for Old Farmer’s Almanac, and NH Home Magazine Landscaping at the Water’s Edge provides hands-on tools that teach us about positive change. It’s an excellent resource for the gardener, the professional landscaper, designer, and landscape architect—to learn how to better dovetail our landscapes with those of nature. ~Jon Batson, President, NH Landscape Association Pictured here are the : A major river watersheds in N ECOLOGICAL APPROACH New Hampshire. This guide explains how our landscaping choices impact surface and ground waters and demonstrates how, with simple observation, ecologically based design, and low impact maintenance practices, you can protect, and even improve, the quality of our water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Louvicourt Tailings Storage Facility And
    REPORT Louvicourt Mine Tailings Storage Facility and Polishing Pond Tailings Storage Facility Annual Inspection Submitted to: Morgan Lypka, P.Eng. Teck Resources Ltd. 601 Knighton Road, Kimberley, BC V1A 3E1 Submitted by: Golder Associates Ltd. 7250, rue du Mile-End, 3e étage Montréal (Québec) H2R 3A4 Canada +1 514 383 0990 001-20145710-3000-RA-Rev0 April 2, 2021 April 2, 2021 001-20145710-3000-RA-Rev0 Distribution List 1 e-copy: Teck Resources Ltd., Kimberley, BC 1 e-copy: Golder Associates Ltd., Saskatoon, SK 1 e-copy: Golder Associates Ltd., Montreal, QC i April 2, 2021 001-20145710-3000-RA-Rev0 Executive Summary This report presents the 2020 tailings storage facility annual inspection (TSFAI) for the tailings storage facility (TSF) and polishing pond at the closed Louvicourt mine site located near Val-d’Or, Quebec. This report was prepared based on a site visit carried out on August 17, 2020 by Laurent Gareau and Nicolas Pepin of Golder Associates Ltd (Golder), Morgan Lypka and Jonathan Charland of Teck Resources Limited (Teck, Owner) as well as on a review of available data representative of conditions over the period since the previous annual TSFAI. Golder Associates are the original designer of the facility and have been the provider of the Engineer of Record (EOR) since 2017. Golder performed an inspection in 2009, and then has performed annual inspections of the facilities since 2014. Laurent Gareau assumed the role of EOR for the Louvicourt tailings facility in 2018. The objective of the site visit component of a TSFAI for any such facility is to observe the physical condition of the structures of the facility and look for any signs of changing geotechnical performance such as settlement, bulging, cracking, erosion, seepage and piping.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration of Resource Recovery Into Current Waste Management Through
    INTEGRATION OF RESOURCE RECOVERY INTO CURRENT WASTE MANAGEMENT THROUGH (ENHANCED) LANDFILL MINING Juan Carlos Hernández Parrodi 1,2,*, Hugo Lucas 3, Marco Gigantino 4, Giovanna Sauve 5, John Laurence Esguerra 6,7, Paul Einhäupl 5,7, Daniel Vollprecht 2, Roland Pomberger 2, Bernd Friedrich 3, Karel Van Acker 5, Joakim Krook 6, Niclas Svensson 6 and Steven Van Passel 7 1 Renewi Belgium SA/NV, NEW-MINE project, 3920 Lommel, Belgium 2 Montanuniversität Leoben, Department of Environmental and Energy Process Engineering, 8700 Leoben, Austria 3 RWTH Aachen University, Process Metallurgy and Metal Recycling, 52056 Aachen, Germany 4 ETH Zürich, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland 5 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Materials Engineering, 3001 Leuven, Belgium 6 Linköping University, Environmental Technology and Management, 58183 Linköping, Sweden 7 Universiteit Antwerpen, Department of Engineering Management, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium Article Info: ABSTRACT Received: Europe has somewhere between 150,000 and 500,000 landfill sites, with an estimat- 1 November 2019 Accepted: ed 90% of them being “non-sanitary” landfills, predating the EU Landfill Directive of 15 November 2019 1999/31/EC. These older landfills tend to be filled with municipal solid waste and Available online: often lack any environmental protection technology. “Doing nothing”, state-of-the- 23 December 2019 art aftercare or remediating them depends largely on technical, societal and eco- Keywords: nomic conditions which vary between countries. Beside “doing nothing” and land- Landfill mining strategies fill aftercare, there are different scenarios in landfill mining, from re-landfilling the Enhanced landfill mining waste into “sanitary landfills” to seizing the opportunity for a combined resource-re- Resource recovery covery and remediation strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Interface Friction Performance
    CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1.0 Introduction 1.1 PVC and HDPE 2.0 Testing Program 2.1 Materials 2.1.1 Geomembranes 2.1.2 Soil 2.1.2.1 Sand 2.1.2.2 Sandy Loam 2.1.2.3 Silty Clay 2.1.3 Geotextile 2.2 Equipment 2.3 Procedure 3.0 Results 3.1 Sand vs Smooth PVC 3.2 Sand vs the Other geomembranes 3.3 Influence of Soil type 3.4 Geomembrane vs Geotextile 4.0 Summary of Results 12 5.0 Discussion 5.1 Failure Modes 5.2 General Observations 5.3 Comparison with existing knowledge 6.0 Conclusions 2 1 References 2 1 APPENDIX A 23 APPENDIX B 29 APPENDIX C 35 APPENDIX D 41 FIGURES Typical cross-sections of modem landfills Schematic representation of stress-strain behaviour of HDPE & PVC Grain-size distribution of Sand, Sandy Loam and Silty clay Reproducibility of test data Sand vs Smooth PVC : Test results Sand vs Smooth HDPE Sandy Loam vs Smooth PVC Silty Clay vs Smooth PVC Non-woven Geotextile vs Smooth PVC Appendix A : Fine Sand vs various Geomembranes Al. Sand vs Smooth PVC A2. Sand vs Textured PVC A3. Sand vs File-finish PVC A4. Sand vs Smooth HDPE A5. Sand vs Textured HDPE Appendix B : Sandy Loam vs various Geomembranes B 1. Sandy Loam vs Smooth PVC B2. Sandy Loam vs Textured PVC B3. Sandy Loam vs File-finish PVC B4. Sandy Loam vs Smooth-HDPE B5. Sandy Loam vs Textured HDPE Appendix C : Silty Clay vs various Geomembranes C1. Silty Clay vs Smooth PVC C2.
    [Show full text]
  • Geosynthetic Liner Systems for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills: an Inadequate Technology for Protection of Groundwater Quality
    Geosynthetic Liner Systems for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills: An Inadequate Technology for Protection of Groundwater Quality G. Fred Lee, PhD, PE and Anne Jones-Lee, PhD G. Fred Lee & Associates El Macero, California Published in: Waste Management & Research 11:354-360 (1993) Waste Management & Research published a paper by Fluet et al. entitled, "A Review of Geosynthetic Liner System Technology" in its March 1992 issue. The geosynthetic liner system technology that they addressed was an engineered containment system for use in lined "dry tomb" landfills in which are placed untreated municipal solid waste (MSW). The "dry tomb" landfilling approach relies on a cover system to in theory keep the wastes dry and a liner system (liner and leachate collection and removal system) to collect and remove leachate. The performance of a "dry tomb" landfill depends on the functioning of the cover and of the liner system for as long as the wastes represent a threat. The Fluet et al. review suggests to the reader that flexible membrane liner systems of the type being constructed today in municipal solid waste landfills will protect groundwater quality from pollution by landfill leachate. Critical examination of the Fluet et al. (1992) review article, however, reveals that they omitted from their discussion some of the most important topics that need to be considered in an evaluation of the efficacy of landfill liner systems in providing truly long-term protection of groundwater quality. Those neglected topics contribute to the assessment of: whether the liner system will prevent groundwater pollution for as long as the wastes represent a threat to groundwater quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on the Design and Construction of Leak-Resistant Geomembrane Boots and Attachments to Structures
    Guidance on the Design and Construction of Leak-Resistant Geomembrane Boots and Attachments to Structures R. Thiel, Vector Engineering, Grass Valley, CA, USA G. DeJarnett, Envirocon, Houston, TX, USA ABSTRACT Experience in reviewing, designing, performing field inspections, and installing of geomembrane boots and connections to structures has revealed a widely diverse practice of standards and approaches. The execution of these details is very much an art in workmanship, and depends a great deal on the experience and understanding of the installer. There is very little guidance in the literature regarding the fine points of specifying and installing these critical details. The typical manufacturers’ details and guidelines are not much more than concepts that have been repeated for two decades. Thus, there is a big difference between what we assume and expect versus what is constructed in terms of leak resistance of geomembrane penetrations and attachments to structures. The goal of this paper is to touch upon some of the detailed and critical aspects that should be addressed when specifying and constructing geomembrane seals around penetrating pipes (referred to as “boots”) and attachments to structures. 1. INTRODUCTION While much attention has been paid in the last 30 years to many other containment issues related to geomembranes (such as chemical compatibility, aging and durability, manufacturing, seaming, subgrade preparation, covering), there is surprisingly little technical discussion related to the design and construction of leak-resistant penetrations and attachments to structures. This subject has largely been relegated to a few simple details, mostly generated by the manufacturers and included in their standard literature. The content of this paper is derived from the authors’ field observations, experience, and deductive reasoning.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Bentonite on Clayey Soil As a Landfill Baseliner Materials
    IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Recent citations Influence of bentonite on clayey soil as a landfill - Vulnerability Assessment of Groundwater Contamination from an Open dumpsite: baseliner materials Labete Dumpsite as a Case study R A Olaoye et al To cite this article: R A Olaoye et al 2019 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 640 012107 - A review of the mineralogical and geotechnical properties of some residual soils in relation to the problems of road failures: A case study of Nigeria R O Sani et al View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 170.106.202.126 on 25/09/2021 at 12:24 1st International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructural Development IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 640 (2019) 012107 doi:10.1088/1757-899X/640/1/012107 Influence of bentonite on clayey soil as a landfill baseliner materials R A Olaoye 1 O D Afolayan 2 V O Oladeji 1 R O Sani 2 1Department of Civil Engineering, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (LAUTECH), Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria. 2Department of Civil Engineering, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria Corresponding Author: [email protected] Abstract. With the geometric population growth in developing nations comes increase in waste generation, these wastes ranging from industrial to agricultural to municipal solid waste calls for measure for its effective management and disposal so as to preserve the ecosystem. An effective measure of containing this large waste generated, is through the use of landfills which are designed and built to protect infiltration of leachates from decomposed waste to the groundwater.
    [Show full text]
  • Aging Management Guideline for Commercial Nuclear Power Plants -Tanks and Pools
    RECORD COPY CONTRACTOR REPORT 1111111111 SAN D96-0343 *W03297W Unlimited Release UC-523 Aging Management Guideline for Commercial Nuclear Power Plants - Tanks and Pools DOE EPRI Commercial Operating Life Cycle Management Program Light Water Reactor Program 3412 Hillview Ave. Off. of Eng. & Tech. Dev. P.O. BOX 10412 19901 Germantown Rd. Palo Alto, California 94303 Germantown, Maryland 20874 Printed February 1996 Prepared by Parsons Power, 2675 Morgantown Road, Reading, PA 19607 and Yankee Atomic Electric Corp., 580 Main St., Bolton, MA 01740, under contract to Sandia National Laboratories for the U.S. Department of Energy, in cooperation with the Electric Power Research Institute. Funded by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. 2/3 p. ;AVLiulsL&lip Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any spe- cific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, any agency thereof or any of their contractors or subcon- tractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden Ponds Jim Sherman
    Garden Ponds Jim Sherman Over the last year, I’ve spent a lot of time pondering. This happens when you’ve got a pond in your garden, and every moment sitting in slack-jawed amazement at all the life thriving in a few gallons of clear amber water is time well spent. My pond is a standard amorphous lumber-yard black-fiberglass prefab, eighteen inches deep in the center with a pair of ten-inch deep shelves molded along what wound up as the east and west ends of the pond, with a capacity of 125 gallons. If I had it to do over again, the financial bullet would have been bitten and a 200 (or more) gallon model purchased; still, even a small pond is one of the most rewarding furnishings a garden can have. A pond is also both a classroom for, and an affirmation of, the organic method of gardening. As the enthusiasm for water gardening grows, countless gardeners who “only wanted to kill the fleas” (or the fire ants, or the aphids) have learned from the fish floating belly-up among the lilies that pesticides kill much farther up the food chain than they realized. Meanwhile, gardeners who refrain from chemical poisons that kill (at least) fish and amphibians in addition to insects fall asleep to the sound of toads in lust, and waken with delight to the sight of gelled ropes of eggs streaming through the water and, later, hundreds of tiny black tadpoles tumbling about in the pond. Toads are the most immediate payoff of having a pond in your organic garden.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomembrane Puncture Potential and Hydraulic Performance in Mining Applications
    GEOMEMBRANE PUNCTURE POTENTIAL AND HYDRAULIC PERFORMANCE IN MINING APPLICATIONS Lining systems in mining applications often consist of a geomembrane underlain by either a soil liner or a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL). When under load, geomembranes are vulnerable to damage from large stones both in the compacted soil subgrade and in the overlying drainage layer. Although guidance has been developed for minimizing geomembrane puncture, this past work has focused on subgrade protrusions in municipal solid waste applications. There has been limited information regarding puncture performance in mining applications, where extreme loads are encountered and angular, large-diameter crushed ore is often used as the drainage medium above the geomembrane. The attached paper discusses a laboratory puncture testing program involving various geomembranes placed in direct contact with different drainage media under high loads, both with and without underlying GCLs. Variables being examined include: geomembrane type and thickness, GCL type, normal load, and drainage stone size. Preliminary test results have shown that geomembrane/GCL composite liners are subject to less puncture damage (i.e., lower defect frequency and/or smaller puncture sizes) than geomembrane liners alone. The paper also presents a feasibility study of two lining alternatives, geomembrane/compacted soil and geomembrane/GCL composites. The feasibility study compares technical effectiveness and cost effectiveness based on cost savings associated with improved metal recovery rates afforded by improved containment. This information is intended for mining companies and engineers in evaluating lining options and allowable stone sizes. This paper was presented at the Tailings and Mine Waste ’08 Conference. TR 260 11/08 800.527.9948 Fax 847.577.5566 For the most up-to-date product information, please visit our website, www.cetco.com.
    [Show full text]