Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 150
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Station Casinos Is the Premier Provider of Gaming and Entertainment for Residents of the Las Vegas Valley
Annual 20 00 Report opportunity...the road to Outlets Acreage Location Main Facility Sq. Footage Casino Sq. Footage Slots Tables Rooms Restaurants Fast-Food Movie Screens Bowling Lanes Child Care Covered Parking Opening/ Acquisition Date PALACE STATION Las Vegas, NV 39 287,000 84,000 2,084 51 1,014 5 5 — — — 1,900 7/76 BOULDER STATION Las Vegas, NV 46 337,000 89,000 2,988 44 300 5 7 11 — Yes 1,900 8/94 TEXAS STATION North Las Vegas, NV 47 568,350 102,300 2,999 40 200 5 8 18 60 Yes 3,500 7/95 SUNSET STATION Henderson, NV 105 428,000 110,000 3,059 55 467 7 8 13 — Yes 2,900 6/97 SANTA FE STATION Las Vegas, NV 38 366,000 85,000 1,840 27 200 3 — — 60 — — 10/00 GREEN VALLEY RANCH Henderson, NV 40 435,000 55,000 2,531 42 200 6 6 10 — — 2,000 12/01 FIESTA CASINO HOTEL North Las Vegas, NV 25 170,000 70,000 1,850 24 100 5 3 — — — 1,000 1/01 THE RESERVE Henderson, NV 46 190,000 42,000 1,450 26 224 6 3 — — — — 1/01 WILD WILD WEST Las Vegas, NV 19 16,000 12,500 248 7 260 1 — — — — — 7/98 BARLEY’S CASINO & Henderson, NV — 26,000 10,000 199 9 — 1 — — — — — 1/96 BREWERY SOUTHWEST GAMING Las Vegas Metro Area — N/A N/A 790 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 12/90 ROUTE TOTALS 405 2,823,350 659,800 20,038 325 2,965 44 40 52 120 — 13,200 familiar ...leads us to territory STATION CASINOS IS THE PREMIER PROVIDER OF GAMING AND ENTERTAINMENT FOR RESIDENTS OF THE LAS VEGAS VALLEY. -
World War II Era Residential Housing in Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada (1940–1945)
World War II Era Residential Housing in Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada (1940–1945) HPF Tracking No.: P14AS00012(3) Prepared for: The city of Las Vegas Development Services Center and Historic Preservation Commission Prepared by: Greta J. Rayle, M.A., RPA and Helana Ruter, M.A. Logan Simpson 3753 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 235 Las Vegas, NV 89169 June 2015 LSD Technical Report No. 145648 The archival research and windshield survey of historic properties that is the subject of this historic context on World War II era residential housing in the city of Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada has been financed in whole or part with federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and administered by the State Historic Preservation Office. The contents and opinions, however, do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior or the State Historic Preservation Office. This program receives federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Chief, Office of Equal Opportunity Programs, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1201 Eye Street, NW (2740), Washington, D.C. -
Extensions of Remarks E302 HON. JIM GIBBONS
E302 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð Extensions of Remarks March 14, 2000 drinking water delivery options. Only 8.3% We urge you to support H.R. 1695. of Aviation's efforts to acquire Ivanpah Val- said they would rather have their drinking Sincerely, ley land for an airport; and be it further water from a water utility company. This legis- JEFFREY GOODELL, Resolved, that the Las Vegas Chamber of Vice President, Government Affairs. Commerce as the representative of more lation gives consumers the ability to pay for than 6,000 member businesses in Southern new or refurbished individual household water Nevada, encourages the House of Representa- well systems with convenient monthly pay- AMERICAN ASSOCIATION tives to pass H.R. 1695, providing the Bureau ments, like other utility bills. OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES, of Land Management with the authority to Alexandria, VA, March 3, 2000. It is my understanding, Mr. Speaker, that or- sell the identified land in the Ivanpah Valley Hon. JAMES GIBBONS, ganizations like the National Ground Water to Clark County; and be it further U.S. Representative, Cannon House Office Resolved, that copies of this Resolution be Association, a group that has a long and dis- Building, Washington, DC. transmitted to Nevada's Congressional dele- tinguished record preserving and protecting DEAR REPRESENTATIVE GIBBONS: The U.S. gation. America's precious ground water resources, House of Representatives will shortly be con- DONALD L. ``PAT'' SHALMY, strongly endorses this legislation. It is my sidering H.R. 1695, which would permit Clark President General Manager. hope that other organizations and commu- County, Nevada to purchase 6,500 acres of federal land in the Ivanpah Valley for a fu- nities that support common sense, innovative ture commercial airport site. -
South Clark County Land Use Plan
South Clark County Land Use Plan Henderson Mt. Potosi Boulder Spring Mtns City NRA Sloan Red Rock NCA Sloan Canyon Eldorado National Valley Conservation Area Sandy Goodsprings Valley 161 Jean 165 Colorado River Nelson Ivanpah McCullough Range Valley Lake Mead Primm 95 National Recreation Area California Arizona Cottonwood Cove 164 Searchlight Lake Mojave Goodsprings & Sandy Valley Cal-Nev-Ari Citizens Advisory Councils Palm & Searchlight Gardens 163 Town Advisory Board Laughlin Adopted - December 5, 2012 Effective - January 9, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Clark County Board of Commissioners: Mark Silverstein, Department of Aviation Susan Brager, Chair Margie Yatson, Clark County Fire Steve Sisolak, Vice-Chair Department Larry Brown Linda Perri, Clark County School District Tom Collins Lebene Aidam-Ohene, High Impact Projects Chris Giunchigliani Manager Mary Beth Scow Denis Cedarburg, Public Works Lawrence Weekly Kevin Eubanks, Regional Flood Control Julie Chadburn, Water Reclamation District Planning Commission: Kathleen Blakely, Park Planning Vivian Kilarski, Chair Justin Williams, Park Planning Edward Frasier, III, Vice-Chair J. Christopher Dapper Office of County Manager: Greg Esposito Don Burnette, Manager Randy Miller Randall J. Tarr, Assistant Manager Dan Shaw Ed Finger, Assistant Manager Donna Tagliaferri Jeff Wells, Assistant Manager Goodsprings Citizens Advisory Council: Department of Comprehensive Planning: Elizabeth Warren, Chair Nancy Lipski, Director Monica Beisecker, Vice-Chair Jon Wardlaw, Planning Manager Theodore Louis Compton -
The Mississippi of the West?
THE MISSISSIPPI OF THE WEST? Michael S. Green* During the 1950s, African Americans in Las Vegas began referring to their city and state as the "Mississippi of the West." Magazine writers and civil rights advocates around the country picked up on the phrase. As the leading scholar of Las Vegas history, Eugene Moehring, wrote after cataloguing and condemning local racism: [T]his conclusion seems a bit overdrawn. While Las Vegas was certainly no bastion of equality, it was no worse a town for blacks than Phoenix, Salt Lake, and most medium-sized cities in California. Indeed, segregated housing, schools, and job dis- crimination were common throughout the mid-twentieth-century west. So too was the rippling effect of the national civil rights movement.' As NAACP attorney Franklin Williams said during a 1954 visit, Las Vegas was "a non-southern city with the pattern of the deep south ....Human rights in the western states are in a vacuum. "2' How this situation developed is both tragic and ironic. The tragedy of racism and segregation is obvious. The irony lies in the evolution of Nevada's political economy, the witting and unwitting role of the federal government, and the growth of Nevada's largest industries, gaming and tourism. Together, these factors managed to worsen de facto segregation while also sowing the seeds of its destruction.3 The inseparable issues of slavery and race affected Nevada's origins as a territory and a state. The Compromise of 1850 had created the Utah and New Mexico territories, which divided present-day Nevada: Utah included the Great Basin north while New Mexico included the bulk of what is now Clark County, Nevada, including Las Vegas. -
One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America
H. R. 5200 One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two An Act To establish wilderness areas, promote conservation, improve public land, and pro- vide for high quality development in Clark County, Nevada, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clark County Conservation of Public Land and Natural Resources Act of 2002’’. SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS. The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title. Sec. 2. Table of contents. Sec. 3. Definitions. Sec. 4. Authorization of appropriations. TITLE I—RED ROCK CANYON NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA LAND EXCHANGE AND BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT Sec. 101. Short title. Sec. 102. Definitions. Sec. 103. Findings and purposes. Sec. 104. Red Rock Canyon land exchange. Sec. 105. Status and management of lands. Sec. 106. General provisions. TITLE II—WILDERNESS AREAS Sec. 201. Findings. Sec. 202. Additions to National Wilderness Preservation System. Sec. 203. Administration. Sec. 204. Adjacent management. Sec. 205. Military overflights. Sec. 206. Native American cultural and religious uses. Sec. 207. Release of wilderness study areas. Sec. 208. Wildlife management. Sec. 209. Wildfire management. Sec. 210. Climatological data collection. Sec. 211. National Park Service lands. TITLE III—TRANSFERS OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION Sec. 301. Transfer of administrative jurisdiction to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. -
Clark County Department of Aviation Southern Nevada Supplemental Airport Planning - Phase 1 Project Briefing
Clark County Department of Aviation Southern Nevada Supplemental Airport Planning - Phase 1 Project Briefing PRESENTED TO: PRESENTED BY: PRESENTED ON: Governor’s Office of Economic Development Clark County Department of Aviation and Thursday, June 24, 2021 Southern Nevada Infrastructure Development Working Group Ricondo & Associates, Inc. SNSA Planning – Phase 1 Project Team: Agenda and Introductions Ricondo & Associates, Inc. Management Team, Terminal, Airport Layout Plan and Airspace ▪ Historical Project Overview BEC Environmental, Inc. Permitting ▪ Current Project Overview CA Group, Inc. Public Outreach and Ground Transportation ▪ Project Coordination and Engagement Connico Cost Estimating ▪ Open Discussion and Questions Geotechnical & Environmental Services, Inc. Geotechnical Services GCW, Inc. Utilities, Stormwater and Drainage HNTB Corporation Airfield Pavement and Parking Structures Loomacres Wildlife Management, Inc. Wildlife Hazard Assessment Planning Technology, Inc. Obstruction Analysis Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Hydrology and Material Transport VTN Nevada Surveying Clark County Department of Aviation | SNSA Planning – Phase 1 | June 2021 2 Historical Project Overview Clark County Department of Aviation | SNSA Planning – Phase 1 | June 2021 3 SNSA Planning – Phase 1 Historical Efforts ▪ Ivanpah Valley Airport Public Lands Transfer Act of 2000 – Conveyed 6,000 acres of land for construction and operation of an airport – Designated Joint Lead Agencies (JLA) for Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) ̶ Department of Transportation -
Article Explores Clark County’S Approach to Dealing with Construction of a Major Airport Takes Decades
FALL 2010 inside: Adapting Long-Range Plans to Economic inaugural issue Realities: A Case Study for Clark County LOOKING Carson City Business FORWARD Resource Innovation Center A Look to the Past with an Eye on the Future of Planning in the Las Vegas Valley Urban Forestry and Planning CLV Makes Development Review Process More Efficient Adapting Long-Range Plans to Economic Realities: A Case Study from Clark County Teresa Motley, AICP LOOKING NORTH FROM PRIMM AT THE FUTURE SITE OF THE IVANPAH AIRPORT IVANPAH THE OF SITE FUTURE THE AT PRIMM FROM NORTH LOOKING Introduction Consequently, this year CCDOA had to reconsider how to In the mid-1990s, the Clark County Department of Aviation continue planning for a major public infrastructure project that (CCDOA) concluded that the McCarran International Airport was expected to take almost two decades to plan, design, and (LAS) could not accommodate projected long-term demand build. The long lead time required to construct a new facility for commercial air service in the region. Based on historical can be extraordinarily difficult to reconcile during an economic growth patterns, projections for future growth, and the downturn of unknown proportions. Planners’ uncertainties physical constraints of LAS, the County anticipated LAS would regarding how to model future demand add to the complexity. exceed capacity shortly before 2020. Planning and This article explores Clark County’s approach to dealing with construction of a major airport takes decades. Accordingly, this issue. CCDOA began planning for a new commercial service airport in the Las Vegas metropolitan area to supplement the Planning the Ivanpah Airport Project available capacity at LAS. -
Community Resources/Las Vegas
Community Resources/Las Vegas Provided by Courtesy of Nevada Early Intervention Services-Christy Santoro March 2013 Absolute Health Care 2860 E.Flamingo Rd Ste B Accepts Medicaid, house cleaning and other services for LAS VEGAS, NV 89121 families. 702-318-5005 Access Health/Las Vegas 702-430-3580 A program that links those who qualify and are uninsured to www.gbpca.org/accesshealth affordable primary and specialty healthcare services. Accessible Space 6375 W. Charleston Blvd, suite 200 Building L Provides accessible, affordable rental housing. Also operates Las Vegas, 89146 an assistive technology center and the Nevada Community 702-259-1903 Enrichment Program which provides day treatment, residential, Toll free: 800-466-7722 supportive housing and independent living services to Nevadans with disabilities. Also provides home buer down payment assistance. Insurance accepted. Adaptive Occupational Therapy Services (OT services for 259-6336 children and adults) “Servicios de Terapia Ocupacional Adaptiva (Servicios de Terapia Ocupacional para niños y adultos)” ADAMS ESQ http://www.adamsesq.com/ Special Education Law 500 N. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 300, Las Vegas, NV 89107. The attorneys and staff at ADAMS ESQ are committed to For more information please contact us toll free at: 1-800-785- providing exceptional legal representation free of charge to 6713 parents. Phone: (702) 289-4143 (phone); (702) 924-7200 (fax) Email: [email protected] Adelson Clinic for Drug Treatment Main Phone Number Substance abuse services and treatment, outpatient, accepts (702) 735-7900 Medicaid. Groups include, men, women and dually Diagnosed. Intake Phone Number (702) 735-7900 Facility Address 3661 South Maryland Parkway Suite 64 Las Vegas, NV 89109 AFAN (Aid for AIDS of Nevada) 701 Shadow Ln, suite 170 Provides case management for HIV positive residents of Clark Las Vegas, NV 89102 County. -
Planning Variable Development and Methodology
PLANNING VARIABLE DEVELOPMENT AND METHODOLOGY Regional Transportation Commission Of Southern Nevada (RTC) Metropolitan Planning Organization 600 South Grand Central Parkway, Suite 350 Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 July 2020 Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Acknowledgement The Planning Variable (PV) projections are the results of the collaborative efforts of the Land Use Working Group (LUWG) and the RTC of Southern Nevada. The LUWG includes the following organizations: Clark County Comprehensive Planning Department City of Las Vegas Planning and Development Department City of North Las Vegas Planning and Development Department City of Henderson Community Development Department RTC wishes to recognize and extend its appreciation to the above organizations for their valuable assistance in the development of PV projections. RTC would also like to express its appreciations to the LUWG, the following LUWG members and individuals for their input and participation in the planning process: LUWG members Mario Bermudez, Clark County Richard Wassmuth, City of Las Vegas Johanna Murphy, City of North Las Vegas Andrew Powell, City of Henderson Ayoub Ayoub, Southern Nevada Water Authority Bill Murray, Las Vegas Water District Brian MAnallen, Las Vegas Chamber JJ Peck, CBRE Mark Silverstein, Roben Armstrong: McCarran Airport Richard Baldwin, Clark County School District Rick Schroder, City of Las Vegas Shane Ammerman, Clark County Sharianne Dotson, City of North Las Vegas Victor Rodriguez, Nellis Air Force Base Alexander Tong, Clark County -
California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment / Final Environmental Impact Statement for Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System
CALIFORNIA DESERT CONSERVATION AREA PLAN AMENDMENT / FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR IVANPAH SOLAR ELECTRIC GENERATING SYSTEM FEIS-10-31 JULY 2010 BLM/CA/ES-2010-010+1793 In Reply Refer To: In reply refer to: 1610-5.G.1.4 2800lCACA-48668 Dear Reader: Enclosed is the proposed California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment and Final Environmental Impact Statement (CDCA Plan Amendment/FEIS) for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) project. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) prepared the CDCA Plan Amendment/FEIS for the ISEGS project in consultation with cooperating agencies and California State agencies, taking into account public comments received during the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. The proposed plan amendment adds the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System project site to those identified in the current California Desert Conservation Area Plan, as amended, for solar energy production. The decision on the ISEGS project will be to approve, approve with modification, or deny issuance of the rights-of-way grants applied for by Solar Partners I, 11, IV, and VIII. This CDCA Plan Amendment/FEIS for the ISEGS project has been developed in accordance with NEPA and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976. The CDCA Plan Amendment is based on the Mitigated Ivanpah 3 Alternative which was identified as the Agency Preferred Alternative in the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement for ISEGS, which was released on April 16,2010. The CDCA Plan Amendment/FEIS contains the proposed plan amendment, a summary of changes made between the DEIS, SDEIS and FEIS for ISEGS, an analysis of the impacts of the proposed decisions, and a summary of the written and oral comments received during the public review periods for the DEIS and for the SDEIS, and responses to comments. -
Community Resource Guide
Clark County School District Community Resource Guide 2021 REV. 01.11.2020 DRAFT 1 Table of Contents Immediate Assistance Crisis Hotlines.................................................................................................................................... 3 Local Law Enforcement ................................................................................................................... 5 Mental Health Treatment Centers .................................................................................................. 6 Shelter ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Shelter (Youth) .................................................................................................................................. 8 Substance Abuse ............................................................................................................................. 9 Suicide ............................................................................................................................................ 10 General Resources Child Care and After School Programs ....................................................................................... 11 Clothing .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Community Service Agencies .....................................................................................................