DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography BIBLIOGRAPHY A ............................................................................................................................. 1106-1114 B ............................................................................................................................. 1114-1138 C .............................................................................................................................1138-1151 D ............................................................................................................................1152-1163 E, F .........................................................................................................................1163-1176 G, H........................................................................................................................1176-1207 I, J ..........................................................................................................................1207-1215 K ............................................................................................................................1215-1229 L .............................................................................................................................1229-1241 M ............................................................................................................................1241-1261 N, O........................................................................................................................1261-1270 P, Q .........................................................................................................................1270-1282 R .............................................................................................................................1283-1295 S .............................................................................................................................1295-1320 T, U ........................................................................................................................1320-1330 V, W .......................................................................................................................1330-1347 X, Y, Z ....................................................................................................................1347-1350 1106 © J. ALTMAN: NEURAL AND MENTAL EVOLUTION Abbie, A. A. 1969. The Original Australians. New York: Elsevier. Abbott, D. H., E. B. Keverne, F. B. Bercovitch, et al. 2003. Are subordinates always stressed? A comparative analysis of rank differences in cortisol levels among primates. Hormones and Behavior, 43:67-82. Abbott, J. C. and L. M. Dill. 1989. The relative growth of dominant and subordinate juvenile steelhead trout (Salmo gairdneri) fed equal rations. Behavior, 108:104-113. Abbott, L. F., E. T. Rolls and M. J. Tovee. 1996. Representational capacity of face coding in monkeys. Cerebral Cortex, 6:498-505. Aboitiz, F. 1995. Evolutionary origins of the reptilian brain: The question of putative homologues of dorsal ventricular ridge: An overview and proposal. Biological Research, 28:187-196. Abrams, L. 1995. Bismarck and the German Empire 1871-1918. Oxford: Routledge. Acuña, C., F. Gonzalez and R. Dominguez. 1983. Sensorimotor unit activity related to intention in the pulvinar of behaving Cebus apella monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 52:411-422. Adams, D. K. 1929. Experimental studies of adaptive behavior in cats. Comparative Psychological Monographs, 6:1-168. Adams, M. M., P. R. Hof, R. Gattass, M. J. Webster and L. G. Ungerleider. 2000. Visual cortical projections and chemoarchitecture of macaque monkey pulvinar. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 419:377-393. Adelson, J. (ed.) 1980. Handbook of Adolescent Psychology. New York: Wiley. Ades, W. H. 1946. Effect of extirpation of parastriate cortex on learned visual discrimination in monkeys. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 5:60-65. Ades, H. W. 1943. A secondary acoustic area in the cerebral cortex of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 6:59-63. Ades, H. W. and R. Felder. 1942. The acoustic area of the monkey (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Neurophysiology, 5:49-54. Ades, H. W. and D. H. Raab. 1949. Effects of preoccipital and temporal decortication on learned visual discrimination in monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology, 12:101-108 Adler, J. 1975. Chemotaxis in bacteria. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 44:341-356. Adli, D. S., S. L. Stuesse and W. L. Cruce. 1999. Immunohistochemistry and spinal projections of the reticular formation in the northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 404:387-407. Adolphs, R., D. Tranel and A. Damasio. 2001. Neural systems subserving emotion: Lesion studies of the amygdala, somatosensory cortices, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. In: G. Gainotti (ed.), Handbook of Neuropsychology (2nd ed.) Vol. 5, pp. 89-109. Adolphs, R., D. Tranel, H. Damasio and A. Damasio, 1994. Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala. Nature, 372:669-672. Adolphs, R., D. Tranel, H. Damasio and A. Damasio. 1995. Fear and the human amygdala. Journal of Neuroscience, 15:5879-5892. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1107 Adrian, E. D. 1928. The Basis of Sensation. London: Christophers. Adrian, E. D. 1941. Afferent discharges to the cerebral cortex from peripheral sense organs. Journal of Neurophysiology, 100:159-191. Agarwala, S., A. E. Gunluk, J. G. May and H. M. Petry. 1992. Immunohistochemical organization of the ventral lateral geniculate nucleus in the tree shrew. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 318:267-276. Agata, K., Y. Soejima, K. Kato, Y. Kobayashi, Y. Umesono and W. Watanabe. 1998. Structure of the planarian central nervous system revealed by neuronal cell markers. Zoological Science, 15:433-440. Agata, K. and Y. Umesono. 2008. Brain regeneration from pluripotent stem cells in planarian. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, 363B: 2071-2078. Aggleton, J. P., M. J. Burton and R. E. Passingham. 1980. Cortical and subcortical afferents to the amygdala of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Brain Research, 190:347-368. Aggleton, J. P. and M. Mishkin. 1983. Memory impairments following restricted medial thalamic lesions in monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 52:199-209. Aggleton, J. P. and M. Mishkin. 1984. Projections of the amygdala to the thalamus in the cynomolgus monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 222:56-68. Aggleton, J. P. and R. E. Passingham. 1981. Syndrome produced by lesions of the amygdala in monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 95:961-977. Ahlberg, P. E., J. A. Clack and E. Luksevics. 1996. Rapid braincase evolution between Pandericthys and the earliest tetrapods. Nature, 381:61-64. Ahlberg, P. E., J. A. Clack and H. Blom. 2005. The axial skeleton of the Devonian tetrapod Ichthyostega. Science, 437:137-140. Aiello, L. C. and R. I. M. Dunbar. 1993. Neocortex size, group size, and the evolution of language. Current Anthropology, 34:184-193. Ainsworth, M. D. S. 1969. Object relations, dependency and attachment: A theoretical review of of the infant- mother relationship. Child Development, 40:969-1025. Ainsworth, M. D. S., M. C. Blehar, E. Waters and S. Walls. 1978. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Aisner, R. and J. Terkel. 1992. Ontogeny of pine-cone opening behavior in the black rat (Rattus rattus). Animal Behaviour, 44:327-336. Akkal, D., B. Bioulac, J. Audin and P. Burbaud. 2002. Comparison of neuronal activity in the rostral supplementary and cingulate motor areas during a task with cognitive and motor demands. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15:887-904. Akkal, D., R. P. Dum and P. L. Strick. 2007. Supplementary and presupplementary motor area: Targets of basal ganglia and cerebellar output. Journal of Neuroscience, 27:10659-10673. Akkermans, P. M. M. G. and G. M. Schwartz. 2003. The Archaeology of Syria: From Complex Hunter- Gatherers to Early Urban Societies (ca. 16,000-300 BC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1108 © J. ALTMAN: NEURAL AND MENTAL EVOLUTION Alba, D. M., S. Moya-Sola and M. Kohler. 2003. Morphological affinities of theAustralopithecus afarensis hand on the basis of manual proportions and relative thumb length. Journal of Human Evolution, 44:225- 254. Albano, J. E., T. T. Norton and W. C. Hall. 1979. Laminar origin of projections from the superficial layers of the superior colliculus in the tree shrew, Tupaia glis. Brain Research. 173:1-11. Albertano, P., L. Barsanti, V. Passarelli and P. Gualtieri. 2000. A complex photoreceptive structure in the cyanobacterium Leptolyngbya sp. Micron, 31:27-34. Albiach-Serrano, A., J. Call and J. Barth. 2010. Great apes track hidden objects after changes in the object’s position and in the subject’s orientation. American Journal of Primatology, 72:349-359. Albrecht, H. 1966. Zur Stammesgeschichte einiger Bewegungsweisen bei Fischen: Untersucht am Verhalten von Haplochromis (Pisces, Cichlidae). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 23:270-302. Albright, T. D., R. Desimone and C. G. Gross. 1984. Columnar organization of directionally selective cells in visual area MT of the macaque. Journal of Neurophysiology, 51:16-31. Alcorta, C and R. Sosis. 2005. Ritual, emotion and sacred symbols: The evolution of religion as an adaptive complex. Human Nature, 16:323-359 Aldis, O. 1975. Play Fighting. New York: Academic Press. Alexander, G. E. and M. D. Crutcher. 1990. Preparation for movement: Neural representations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status of the Fisheries Report an Update Through 2008
    STATUS OF THE FISHERIES REPORT AN UPDATE THROUGH 2008 Photo credit: Edgar Roberts. Report to the California Fish and Game Commission as directed by the Marine Life Management Act of 1998 Prepared by California Department of Fish and Game Marine Region August 2010 Acknowledgements Many of the fishery reviews in this report are updates of the reviews contained in California’s Living Marine Resources: A Status Report published in 2001. California’s Living Marine Resources provides a complete review of California’s three major marine ecosystems (nearshore, offshore, and bays and estuaries) and all the important plants and marine animals that dwell there. This report, along with the Updates for 2003 and 2006, is available on the Department’s website. All the reviews in this report were contributed by California Department of Fish and Game biologists unless another affiliation is indicated. Author’s names and email addresses are provided with each review. The Editor would like to thank the contributors for their efforts. All the contributors endeavored to make their reviews as accurate and up-to-date as possible. Additionally, thanks go to the photographers whose photos are included in this report. Editor Traci Larinto Senior Marine Biologist Specialist California Department of Fish and Game [email protected] Status of the Fisheries Report 2008 ii Table of Contents 1 Coonstripe Shrimp, Pandalus danae .................................................................1-1 2 Kellet’s Whelk, Kelletia kelletii ...........................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • Download (7Mb)
    Vol.14, No.1 GLOBAL OCEAN ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS APRIL 2008 Contents Editorial 2. IMBER-GLOBEC TTT Dawn Ashby, GLOBEC IPO, Plymouth, UK ([email protected]) 3. Concepts in biological The next few months are going to be a busy time for GLOBEC, with the Coping with oceanography Global Change and Eastern Boundary Upwelling Ecosystems symposia being held 8. Coping with global change in the summer, and the GLOBEC SSC meeting at the IGBP Congress in May. Thank symposium you for all of you who have submitted abstracts to the symposia, we have received 9. SAHFOS page a tremendous response to both events and are very much looking forward to what 10. Natural sciences prize promises to be two very exciting meetings. I am also pleased to announce that 11. GLOBEC Norway dates have been set for the 3rd GLOBEC Open Science meeting, which will be held at the Victoria Conference Centre, British Columbia, Canada on 22-26 June 2009. 14. Marine climate change For those of you who were at the ESSAS symposium, you will remember that this is in Irish waters a superb venue and I hope that many of you will be able to attend. 15. US GLOBEC 18. David Cushing It’s all change again in the GLOBEC IPO, we would like to wish Lotty Dunbar well for 19. Japan-China-Korea GLOBEC her maternity leave. Lotty will be away from the IPO for a year from the beginning of April but will be back with us again in time for the OSM next year.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamprey, Hagfish
    Agnatha - Lamprey, Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Super Class: Agnatha Hagfish Agnatha are jawless fish. Lampreys and hagfish are in this class. Members of the agnatha class are probably the earliest vertebrates. Scientists have found fossils of agnathan species from the late Cambrian Period that occurred 500 million years ago. Members of this class of fish don't have paired fins or a stomach. Adults and larvae have a notochord. A notochord is a flexible rod-like cord of cells that provides the main support for the body of an organism during its embryonic stage. A notochord is found in all chordates. Most agnathans have a skeleton made of cartilage and seven or more paired gill pockets. They have a light sensitive pineal eye. A pineal eye is a third eye in front of the pineal gland. Fertilization of eggs takes place outside the body. The lamprey looks like an eel, but it has a jawless sucking mouth that it attaches to a fish. It is a parasite and sucks tissue and fluids out of the fish it is attached to. The lamprey's mouth has a ring of cartilage that supports it and rows of horny teeth that it uses to latch on to a fish. Lampreys are found in temperate rivers and coastal seas and can range in size from 5 to 40 inches. Lampreys begin their lives as freshwater larvae. In the larval stage, lamprey usually are found on muddy river and lake bottoms where they filter feed on microorganisms. The larval stage can last as long as seven years! At the end of the larval state, the lamprey changes into an eel- like creature that swims and usually attaches itself to a fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Information in Taxonomists' Heads to Resolve Hagfish And
    This article was downloaded by: [Max Planck Inst fuer Evolutionsbiologie] On: 03 September 2013, At: 07:01 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ghbi20 Using information in taxonomists’ heads to resolve hagfish and lamprey relationships and recapitulate craniate–vertebrate phylogenetic history Maria Abou Chakra a , Brian Keith Hall b & Johnny Ricky Stone a b c d a Department of Biology , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada b Department of Biology , Dalhousie University , Halifax , Canada c Origins Institute, McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada d SHARCNet, McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada Published online: 02 Sep 2013. To cite this article: Historical Biology (2013): Using information in taxonomists’ heads to resolve hagfish and lamprey relationships and recapitulate craniate–vertebrate phylogenetic history, Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2013.825792 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information.
    [Show full text]
  • Myxine Affinis and Notomyxine Tridentiger) from the Magellan Strait, Chile
    Int. J. Morphol., 35(1):42-46, 2017. Meristic and Morphometric Analysis of Two Hagfish Species (Myxine affinis and Notomyxine tridentiger) from the Magellan Strait, Chile Análisis Merístico y Morfométrico de dos Especies de Anguila Babosa (Myxine affinis y Notomyxine tridentiger) en el Estrecho de Magallanes, Chile Ma. C. Pérez-Cuesta1,3; J. Del Campo1; G. Aedo2; C. Oyarzún2 & E. Daza3 PÉREZ-CUESTA, M. C.; DEL CAMPO, J.; AEDO, G.; OYARZÚN, C. & DAZA, E. Meristic and morphometric analysis of two hagfish species (Myxine affinis and Notomyxine tridentiger) from the Magellan Strait, Chile. Int. J. Morphol., 35(1):42-46, 2017. SUMMARY: Myxinoids in Chile are represented by the subfamilies Eptatretinae and Myxininae, with a total of 14 species, the identification is complex due to the low level of morphological differentiation that characterizes this taxonomic group. Worldwide, hagfish are species of commercial value, and in Chile many attempts have been reported to initiate small-scale fisheries. The aim of the present study is describe the hagfish species caught in an incipient fishery of the Magellan Strait. Samples were collected in the Magellan Strait during eight fishing expeditions from June 2009 to October 2010 in Bahía Lomas (53º48`S; 70°46’W) and Agua Fresca (53º23`S; 70°45’W). The samples were taken at two depths, 0-70 meters and 71-140 meters. Taxonomic keys were used to identify the species. All specimens were individuals from the Myxininae subfamily. From a total of 3946 hagfishes, 99 % (n=3905) were the species Myxine affinis and the remaining 1 % were Notomyxine tridentiger, both reported for Chilean and Argentinean Patagonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic and Taxonomic Issues Concerning Some East African Bird Species, Notably Those Where Treatment Varies Between Authors
    Scopus 34: 1–23, January 2015 Systematic and taxonomic issues concerning some East African bird species, notably those where treatment varies between authors Donald A. Turner and David J. Pearson Summary The taxonomy of various East African bird species is discussed. Fourteen of the non- passerines and forty-eight of the passerines listed in Britton (1980) are considered, with reference to treatments by various subsequent authors. Twenty-three species splits are recommended from the treatment in Britton (op. cit.), and one lump, the inclusion of Jackson’s Hornbill Tockus jacksoni as a race of T. deckeni. Introduction With a revision of Britton (1980) now nearing completion, this is the first of two pa- pers highlighting the complexities that surround some East African bird species. All appear in Britton in one form or another, but since that landmark publication our knowledge of East African birds has increased considerably, and with the advances in DNA sequencing, our understanding of avian systematics and taxonomy is con- tinually moving forward. A tidal wave of phylogenetic studies in the last decade has revolutionized our understanding of the higher-level relationships of birds. Taxa pre- viously regarded as quite distantly related have been brought together in new clas- sifications and some major groups have been split asunder (Knox 2014). As a result we are seeing the familiar order of families and species in field guides and checklists plunged into turmoil. The speed at which molecular papers are being published continues at an unprec- edented rate. We must remember, however, that while many molecular results may indicate a relationship, they do not necessarily prove one.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisher, D. & Hunter, N. 2016. East African Rarities Committee Report 2013–2015. Scopus 36
    East African rarities committee report 57 East African Rarities Committee Report 2013–2015 David Fisher (Chairman) and Nigel Hunter (Secretary) on behalf of the EARC The East African Rarities Committee assesses records of new and very rare birds occurring in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Rwanda. This includes up to the fifth record of any species from each of the four countries. Sightings of species for which there are fewer than five records for a country should be submitted to the EARC Secretary: Nigel Hunter, P.O. Box 24803, Karen 00502, Nairobi, Kenya. Email: nigelhunter@ timbale.org. Please contact the Secretary to obtain clarification of whether a record requires a submission and for guidance on what details to include in the submission. Past records of rare species are also sought in order to bring the EARC database up to date. Since the Committee’s last report in 2014 (Scopus 33: 87–91) the following records have been accepted: Forest Francolin Peliperdix lathami First record for Tanzania at Minziro Forest on 19 July 1987. Observed regularly on the forest floor and roosting up to 5m above the forest floor at night. Adult and juvenile birds were mist netted and photographed on at least two occasions (Howell 1987). One adult female specimen is currently housed in the AMNH, New York. Previously known only from southern and western Uganda in the Mabira Forest 1913-16, the Bwamba lowlands in 1967, and the Kibale Forest in 1985. Although not racially assigned, the Minziro birds appear to be heavier and longer-winged than typical schubotzi in Uganda (N.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Respiratory Physiology of Neomyxine Biniplicata, the Slender Hagfish
    Respiratory Physiology of Neomyxine biniplicata, the Slender Hagfish A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Canterbury By Catherine Philippa Edwards University of Canterbury, New Zealand 2019 Table of Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... ix List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... xii Abstract............................................................................................................................. xiii Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... xv Chapter One Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Family Myxinidae ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Palaeozoic Era ........................................................................................................ 2 1.3 The Ostracoderms ......................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Early vertebrate evolution and relationships ........................................................... 3 1.5 Sub-families of Myxinidae ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Crossroads in Developmental Biology: Cyclostomes (Lamprey and Hagfish) Sebastian M
    PRIMER SERIES PRIMER 2091 Development 139, 2091-2099 (2012) doi:10.1242/dev.074716 © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: cyclostomes (lamprey and hagfish) Sebastian M. Shimeld1,* and Phillip C. J. Donoghue2 Summary and is appealing because it implies a gradual assembly of vertebrate Lampreys and hagfish, which together are known as the characters, and supports the hagfish and lampreys as experimental cyclostomes or ‘agnathans’, are the only surviving lineages of models for distinct craniate and vertebrate evolutionary grades (i.e. jawless fish. They diverged early in vertebrate evolution, perceived ‘stages’ in evolution). However, only comparative before the origin of the hinged jaws that are characteristic of morphology provides support for this phylogenetic hypothesis. The gnathostome (jawed) vertebrates and before the evolution of competing hypothesis, which unites lampreys and hagfish as sister paired appendages. However, they do share numerous taxa in the clade Cyclostomata, thus equally related to characteristics with jawed vertebrates. Studies of cyclostome gnathostomes, has enjoyed unequivocal support from phylogenetic development can thus help us to understand when, and how, analyses of protein-coding sequence data (e.g. Delarbre et al., 2002; key aspects of the vertebrate body evolved. Here, we Furlong and Holland, 2002; Kuraku et al., 1999). Support for summarise the development of cyclostomes, highlighting the cyclostome theory is now overwhelming, with the recognition of key species studied and experimental methods available. We novel families of non-coding microRNAs that are shared then discuss how studies of cyclostomes have provided exclusively by hagfish and lampreys (Heimberg et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • 먹장어 유래의 Protein Kinase C Βi 과 Βii의 분자생물학적 클로닝, 발현, 효소학적 분석
    JFM SE, 30(5), pp. 1679~1695, 2018. www.ksfme.or.kr 수산해양교육연구, 제30권 제5호, 통권95호, 2018. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2018.10.30.5.1679 Molecular Cloning, Expression, and Enzymatic Analysis of Protein kinase C βI and βII from Inshore hagfish (Eptatretus burgeri) Hyeon-Kyeong JO*ᆞJun-Young CHAE*ᆞHyung-Ho LEE *Pukyong National University(student)ᆞ Pukyong National University(professor) 먹장어 유래의 Protein kinase C βI 과 βII의 분자생물학적 클로닝, 발현, 효소학적 분석 조현경*ㆍ채준영*ㆍ이형호 *부경대학교(학생)ㆍ 부경대학교(교수) Abstract Inshore hagfish (Eptatretus burgeri) belongs to chordate and cyclostomata, so it is considered to be an important organism for the study of embryology and biological evolution. Protein kinase C (PKC) performs a wide range of biological functions regarding proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, motility, and inflammation with cellular signal transduction. In this study, PKC beta isoforms, a member of the conventional class, were cloned. As a result, EbPKCβI and EbPKCβII showed the same sequence in conserved regions (C1, C2, C3, and C4 domain), but not in the C-terminal called the V5 domain. The ORFs of EbPKCβI and EbPKCβII were 2,007 bp and 2,004 bp, respectively. In the analysis of tissue specific expression patterns by qPCR, EbPKCβI was remarkably highly expressed in the root of the tongue and the spinal cord, while EbPKCβII was highly expressed in the gill, liver, and gut. The EbPKC βI and EbPKCβII expressed in E. coli revealed PKC activity according to both qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis. Key word : PKCβI, PKCβII, Cloning, Expression, Enzymatic analysis, Hagfish Ⅰ. Introduction other fins, such as dorsal fin.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda and Rwanda: Shoebill Experience, Nyungwe’S Albertine Rift and Great Apes
    MEGAFARI 2: Uganda and Rwanda: Shoebill experience, Nyungwe’s Albertine Rift and Great Apes 27 July – 7 August 2010 (12 days), Leader: Keith Barnes, Custom trip Photos by Keith Barnes. All photos taken on this trip. The spectacular Green-breasted Pitta was the star of the show in Uganda. We found only the sixth-ever nest of this species and spent a few hours with it gathering valuable information on the breeding biology of this species. Here a male droops his wings and displays to a female on the ground. Introduction This was the first leg of our second Megafari of 2010 – a true trip of a lifetime for most of the participants. The main aims of the Uganda and Rwanda leg was to see a Shoebill stalking in deep Papyrus swamps, attempt to see the most unlikely scarce Central African denizen, Green-breasted Pitta, score a gamut of rainforest birds in both the lowlands of Kibale NP and then also the impressive montane forests of the incredible Nyungwe NP, and to see primates, and of course, the irrepressible great apes, Chimpanzee and Mountain Gorilla. Fortunately, we achieved all these aims, netting 346 bird species on this 12-day leg of the trip, of which only 9 were spent birding, as well as accumulating an incredible 652 bird species and 60 mammals in just over four-weeks of the Megafari. The Megafari was a boon for spectacular birds and we saw 32 species of bird of prey, 8 species of turaco, 7 species of kingfisher, 8 species of bee-eater, 9 species of hornbill, and 28 species of sunbird.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate Uganda
    The extraordinaire Shoebill gave fantastic views during the tour. (DLV. All photos taken by DLV and Bradley Hacker) ULTIMATE UGANDA 15/20 JULY (RWANDA EXTENSION) – 8 AUGUST 2018 LEADER: DANI LOPEZ-VELASCO and LIVINGSTONE KALEMA 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Ultimate Uganda www.birdquest-tours.com For any world-travelling birder, a visit to Uganda should definitely be on the agenda. Why? The fabulous Shoebill is probably a good-enough reason to visit this magical, friendly and welcoming country, but there are many more, including a good selection of Albertine Rift endemics, with such megas as Grauer´s Broadbill or Green-breasted Pitta, as well as other difficult western African forest species. Together with some great mammal watching, with of course primates as the icing of the cake, in particular the mighty Eastern Gorillas and Chimpanzees. Combined with excellent accommodation and food, impressive scenery and a good road network, it´s easy to understand why this African country is undoubtedly one of my favourites in the whole world! Rwanda has a lot to offer too, Nyungwe forest is a wonderful and very birdy place, and in the bird front, the unique Red-collared Mountain Babbler stands out. By visiting the 2 countries, any visiting birder greatly increases the chances of seeing a very good selection of Albertine Rift endemics. This wonderful and rarely seen Green-breasted Pitta was one of the highlights of the tour. This year´s tour was, with over 580 species recorded, packed with highlights, but several stand out: Shoebill, of course, was one of the birds of the trip, and we succeeded in getting walk-away views both at Mabamba and Murchison Falls NP.
    [Show full text]