Leading Creek Watershed TMDL Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Leading Creek Watershed TMDL Report State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency January 2008 Leading Creek Watershed TMDL Report What are the essential facts? • Ohio EPA and other groups studied the Leading Creek watershed and found water quality problems at several of the locations measured. • The watershed can make progress towards restoration with practical, economical actions. • Improving the streams depends on the participation of the watershed’s residents. What is the significance of this report? The Leading Creek Watershed TMDL Report is a tool that includes local ideas from the endorsed watershed management plan and the improvement plan to help improve and maintain water quality and habitat in the watershed. What is a watershed? A watershed is the land area from which surface runoff drains into a specific body of water. Where is the Leading Creek Overall, the land use in the The Leading Creek watershed watershed? Leading Creek watershed is 76 has a long history of coal mining, percent deciduous forest, 20 both underground and at the The Leading Creek watershed percent pasture and hay, 1 percent surface. Over 2,000 acres of is located in southeastern Ohio in row crops, and 1 percent surface mines have been portions of Meigs, Athens and residential. abandoned and left unreclaimed Gallia counties. Leading Creek within the Leading Creek empties into the Ohio River near Recreational opportunities in watershed. In a few of these Middleport. the watershed include camping, areas, the stream hydrology has fishing, boating and hunting. been disrupted and water loss has The watershed drains about 150 square miles and lies within the unglaciated Western Allegheny Plateau ecoregion. The ecoregion is characterized by extensively forested rolling hills with small pockets of dairy, livestock, farming, and residential development. Its underlying bedrock primarily consists of sandstones, shales, limestones, and coal. An estimated 7,000 to 7,500 citizens reside in the Leading Creek watershed. The largest community entirely within the watershed is Rutland, which has a population of approximately 400 people. The communities of Albany and Middleport are located in the headwaters and at the mouth, respectively. Leading Creek about 10 miles upstream from its mouth. Division of Surface Water, 50 West Town Street, Suite 700, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 644-2001 www.epa.state.oh.us Leading Creek Watershed TMDL Report occurred. In 1993, an emergency discharge of contaminated water from the Meigs #31 Mine destroyed habitat and caused a large fish kill in Parker Run and downstream into segments of Leading Creek. This report builds on several previous studies of the Leading Creek watershed, including the Watershed Management Plan, the Acid Mine Drainage Abatement and Treatment (AMDAT) Plan, and the Leading Creek Improvement Plan. Data collected by the Leading Creek Improvement Committee (2003-2006) and for the Leading Creek Improvement Plan (1996, 1997) were used for analyses in the TMDL report. How does Ohio EPA measure water quality? Ohio is one of the few states that measures the health of its streams by examining the number and types of fish and aquatic insects in the water. An abundance of fish and insects that tolerate pollution is an indicator of an What is the condition of the unhealthy stream. A large number Leading Creek watershed? There are acidity impairments of insects and fish that are in Mud Fork, Grass Run, Lasher sensitive to pollution indicates a Results from 25 sites on 18 Run, Little Leading Creek, Titus healthy stream. Such samples streams in the watershed indicate Run, Paulins Hill Run, and Thomas were collected by the Improvement that load reductions are needed in Fork. These impairments primarily Committee from 2003 through total dissolved solids (TDS), total result from acid mine drainage. 2006 and by a group from the suspended solids (TSS), and Virginia Polytechnic Institute in chlorides at numerous locations Unrestricted livestock access, 1996 and 1997. throughout the watershed. For poor grazing land management fecal coliform, pH, and nutrients, and acid mine effects have The watershed’s conditions not enough data were available to degraded the streams. Practices were compared with state water calculate load reductions, but a such as allowing livestock animals quality goals to determine which qualitative analysis and discussion to walk through the stream and stream segments are impaired, is included. poor grazing land management, and how much needs to be done increase erosion and contribute to restore good stream habitat and Many small streams such as excess soil to the stream. Excess water quality. The results were Sisson Run, Ogden Run, Mud soil in the stream destroys the published in the Leading Creek Fork, Prairie, Little Leading Creek, habitat that fish and other aquatic Watershed Management Plan, the Titus and Parker Runs and life need to remain healthy and to AMDAT Plan, and the Leading Thomas Fork, which drain into reproduce. Creek Improvement Plan. Those Leading Creek, and Leading Creek results were then used for downstream of Ogden Run, are Natural vegetation along calculations in the TMDL report. impaired because of physical stream banks acts as a filter to changes to the land. nutrients and sediments flowing 2 Leading Creek Watershed TMDL Report toward the water. When trees and acid mine drainage and improving communities. The basic principles taller grasses along the stream home sewage systems, will be up of providing floodplain connectivity, banks are removed, sediment and to local residents and local, state stable stream morphology and nutrients flow freely into the and federal agencies. watershed hydrology that streams. approximates natural conditions What actions are needed to are applicable to all areas of the While agricultural practices improve water quality? watershed. Likewise, stream can contribute to sediment buffers are appropriate for all land pollution in some of the Leading Because there are many use types in the watershed. Other Creek subwatersheds, Little reasons why streams in the actions include the following: Leading Creek and Leading Creek Leading Creek watershed fail to (downstream of Little Leading meet water quality goals, several ¾ It is highly recommended that Creek) are impaired by large actions are required to improve the the Meigs Mine #31 facility sample sediment loads that likely result current condition and protect the their wastewater for chlorides to from strip mining practices in the watershed in the future. The confirm load concentrations and Little Leading Creek recommendations should focus on allow for the calculation of an subwatershed. reducing pollutant loads and/or appropriate reduction amount. increasing the capacity of the Cows in the streams and streams to handle the remaining ¾ The amount of total dissolved untreated sewage flowing from pollutant loads. solids behing discharged from the failing home septic systems and Meigs Mine #31 facility should be small communities without any Maintaining a natural flow reduced, especially during periods wastewater collection or treatment regime is important for protecting of low stream flow. contribute elevated fecal coliform water quality and aquatic biological to the stream system. How will water quality get better? The Leading Creek watershed is included on Ohio’s list of impaired waters. Under the Clean Water Act, a cleanup plan is required for each impaired watershed. This cleanup plan, known as a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) report, calculates the maximum amount of pollutants a water body can receive and still meet standards (goals). The TMDL report specifies how much pollution must be reduced from various sources and recommends specific actions to achieve these reductions. The TMDL report provides specific numeric goals for reducing pollutants, including pathogens, phosphorus, sediment, and for improving habitat. Ohio EPA can address some of the Leading Creek problems directly through regulatory actions, such as permits for dischargers. Other actions, Measuring water quality in a tributary to Leading Creek. The “yellow boy” such as reducing the impacts of sediments are common in areas affected by acid mine drainage. 3 Leading Creek Watershed TMDL Report ¾ Failing home sewage cattle increases the erosion and Are any actions already treatment systems (HSTSs) should therefore the sediment in the underway? be addressed in rural and streams, and also provides a direct developing areas by the county source of nutrient input to the In addition to the watershed health departments. streams. action plans discussed above, several factors indicate a high ¾ Sediment flowing into streams Who is responsible for taking likelihood that water quality in the is a concern in both agricultural action? watershed can improve: and former mining areas. Controls include reducing erosion with Implementation of this report’s Throughout the work that has cover crops or conservation tillage; recommendations will be been done in the watershed, the providing buffers along stream accomplished by state and local Leading Creek Improvement banks; managing grazing lands to partners, including the voluntary Committee has involved local prevent severe erosion and efforts of landowners. stakeholders through public implementing site-specific meetings and discussions. practices to reduce sources of Locally, discussion of actions sediment and nutrient load, and to restore the watershed has The Leading Creek adopting measures that maintain occurred as diverse partners have Improvement
Recommended publications
  • Gazetteer of West Virginia
    Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig­ inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer­ son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River.
    [Show full text]
  • By Alban W. Coen, III Columbus, Ohio 1992
    STREAMFLOW, WATER-QUALITY, AND BIOLOGICAL DATA ON STREAMS IN AN AREA OF LONGWALL COAL MINING, SOUTHERN OHIO, WATER YEARS 1987-89 By Alban W. Coen, III U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 92-120 Prepared in cooperation with the OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF RECLAMATION Columbus, Ohio 1992 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports 975 W. Third Avenue Section Columbus, OH 43212-3192 Box 25425 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Purpose and scope 2 Overview of longwall coal mining 2 Description of the study area 6 Precipitation during the study period 6 Acknowledgments 10 Methods of study 10 Streamflow measurement 10 Water-quality sampling 10 Collection of stream-biology data 13 Streamflow data 14 Water-quality data 14 Biological data 14 Summary 18 References cited 19 Data tables 21 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Schematic diagram showing longwall mining process 4 2. Diagrammatic section showing fracture zones in overburden above a longwall panel 5 3. Map showing study area and locations of data- collection sites 7 4. Generalized geologic column for study area 8 5. Map showing location of gaging station at Shade River near Chester, Ohio, in relation to study area 12 6. Graphs showing monthly streamflows of Shade River near Chester, Ohio, water years 1987-89 16 7. Graph showing Invertebrate Community Indexes at study sites, water years 1987-89 17 TABLES Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading Creek Conservancy District Water Treatment Plant
    Leading Creek Conservancy District Water Treatment Plant General Information County : Meigs Counties Served: Vinton, Meigs, Gallia Type of System: Public: 6119: X Private: Year Established: 1969 Year of Upgrades: 2003, 1999, 1995 EPA District: Southeast Watershed: Ohio River Valley Aquifer Source: Surface Water: Groundwater: X Purchased Surface Water: Purchased Groundwater: Treatment Type : Chorination, iron and manganese removal, sand filtration Class of Operator License needed: Class 1 Problems with the system: No Issued EPA Violations: No If Yes, Define: Miscellaneous Info: Map of Service area at OVRDC: Contact Information: Leading Creek Conservancy District 34481 Corn Hollow Road, Rutland, Ohio 45775 ℡ 740-742-2411 740-742-2304 Leading Creek Conservancy District Water Treatment Plant System Data Number of Customers or Service Connections: 2,186 Residential : 2,172 Commercial: 14 Industrial: 0 Other: 0 Linear Feet of Waterline: 296-297 miles WTP Capacity (GPD): 1.0 MGD Storage: Towers: Tower Capacity (Gallons): Tanks: X Tank Capacity (Gallons): 870,000 Production: Average Daily Flow: 500,000 Peak Daily Flow (GPD): 710,000 Water Loss Percentage: 13.7% Financial Information Monthly Residential Rates: $16.50 1st 2,000 gals/$7.05 per 1,000 gals for next 3,000 gals; $6.60 per 1,000 gals for next 6,000 gals Monthly Commercial Rates: $25.50 1st 2,000 gals/$7.05 per 1,000 gals for next 3,000 gals; $6.60 per 1,000 gals for next 6,000 gals If municipality, rate for outside of the municipality: N/A Estimated Residential monthly bill based on 4,500 gallons: $31.13 7,756 gallons: $55.84 Scheduled rate increases: No When: N/A How much: N/A Tap fee: $750 Le-Ax Water District General Information County : Athens Counties Served: Vinton, Athens, Hocking, Meigs Type of System: Public: 6119: X Private: Year Established: 2004 for Vinton Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Descriptions and Flow Characteristics of Ohio Streams
    Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water BASIN DESCRIPTIONS AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OHIO STREAMS By Michael C. Schiefer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Bulletin 47 Columbus, Ohio 2002 Robert Taft, Governor Samuel Speck, Director CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………. 2 Previous Studies……………………………………………………………….. 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………… 3 Factors Determining Regimen of Flow………………………………………………... 4 Weather and Climate…………………………………………………………… 4 Basin Characteristics...………………………………………………………… 6 Physiology…….………………………………………………………… 6 Geology………………………………………………………………... 12 Soils and Natural Vegetation ..………………………………………… 15 Land Use...……………………………………………………………. 23 Water Development……………………………………………………. 26 Estimates and Comparisons of Flow Characteristics………………………………….. 28 Mean Annual Runoff…………………………………………………………... 28 Base Flow……………………………………………………………………… 29 Flow Duration…………………………………………………………………. 30 Frequency of Flow Events…………………………………………………….. 31 Descriptions of Basins and Characteristics of Flow…………………………………… 34 Lake Erie Basin………………………………………………………………………… 35 Maumee River Basin…………………………………………………………… 36 Portage River and Sandusky River Basins…………………………………….. 49 Lake Erie Tributaries between Sandusky River and Cuyahoga River…………. 58 Cuyahoga River Basin………………………………………………………….. 68 Lake Erie Tributaries East of the Cuyahoga River…………………………….. 77 Ohio River Basin………………………………………………………………………. 84
    [Show full text]
  • Necturus Maculosus) in Southeast Ohio Using Environmental DNA
    Searching for a Salamander: Distribution and Habitat of the Common Mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus) in Southeast Ohio Using Environmental DNA A thesis presented to the faculty of the Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Merri K. Collins August 2017 © 2017 Merri K. Collins. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Searching for a Salamander: Distribution and Habitat of the Common Mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus) in Southeast Ohio Using Environmental DNA by MERRI K. COLLINS has been approved for the Program of Environmental Studies and the Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs by Shawn R. Kuchta Associate Professor of Biological Sciences Mark Weinberg Dean, Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs 3 ABSTRACT COLLINS MERRI K., M.S., August 2017, Environmental Studies Searching for a Salamander: Distribution and Habitat of the Common Mudpuppy (Necturus maculosus) in Southeast Ohio Using Environmental DNA Director of Thesis: Shawn R. Kuchta Habitat destruction and anthropogenic drivers have led to a decline of amphibian populations worldwide, but the conservation status of many species remains in question. Environmental DNA is a new monitoring methodology that non-invasively detects the presence of imperiled, rare, and secretive species. Although the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect species presence is increasing, it is not often paired with habitat data. This study focuses on the declining Common Mudpuppy salamander, Necturus maculosus. I conducted both traditional and eDNA field surveys at 10 stream sites located in Southeastern Ohio. I detected the presence of Mudpuppies at 6 of 10 streams using eDNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Public Works Commission
    State of Ohio Public Works Commission Clean Ohio Fund - Green Space Conservation Program Acreage Report County Applicant Project Name ProjID Grant Acquired Description Adams Highlands Nature Sanctuary, Inc. Kamama Nature Preserve Expansion CONAD 188,356 93 Acres Acquisition of approximately 93 acres of land in Adams County to nearly double the Kamama Prairie Preserve. This will add nearly one mile of stream protection in the Turkey Creek Watershed, and protects a rare plant community referred to as an"alkaline short-grass prairie." Adams The Nature Conservancy Buzzardroost Rock and Cave Hollow Preserve COCAB 337,050 216 Acres This project consists of acquisition of 216 acres of land in Adams County to expand the Buzzardrock Addition Preserve. The preserve is named for the turkey and black vultures that frequent the 300-foot rock and associated cliffs of the property. Adams The Nature Conservancy Additions To Edge of Appalachia Preserve System CODAC 725,062 383 Acres This project consists of acquisition of 383 acres to expand the Abner Hollow, Cave Hollow, Lynx Prairie, and Wilderness preserves in Adams County. The project serves to protect and increase habitat for threatened and endangered species, preserves streamside forests, connects protected natural areas, provides aesthetic preservation benefits, facilitates good management for safe hunting, and enhances economic development related to recreation and ecotourism. Adams The Nature Conservancy Sunshine Corridor and Adjacent Tracts COEAB 741,675 654 Acres This project consists of the fee simple acquisition of 654 acres at five locations in Adams County. This project protects habitat, preserves headwater streams and streamside forest, connects natural areas, and facilitates outdoor education.
    [Show full text]
  • Meigs County 2019
    Your Guide to Meigs County 2019 Celebrating 200 Years YOUR GUIDE TO MEIGS COUNTY 2019 2019 COUNTY MEIGS TO GUIDE YOUR The official tourism guide to Meigs County The Daily Sentinel Meigs County Chamber of 1 Commerce and Tourism 2 OH-70100997 YOUR GUIDE TO MEIGS COUNTY 2019 COUNTY MEIGS TO GUIDE YOUR Is Your Heart Broken by Addiction?? Health Recovery Services “Where Change & Recovery Begin” Serving those affected with Drug, Alcohol, & Tobacco Addiction and Mental Illness Our Focus: Medically Assisted Treatments: • Opiate Addiction • Individualized Treatment • Alcohol Use Disorder • A ercare Support • Mental Health & Substance Abuse • Vivitrol • Dual Diagnosis/Co-Occurring • Suboxone Disorders Treatment • Methadone erapies O ered: • Individual & Group Th erapy • Motivational Interviewing • Cognitive Behavioral Th erapy • Driver’s Intervention Program • Residential Programing 507 Mulberry Heights , Pomeroy, Ohio 740-992-5277 • www.hrs.org Contact Us Today NEW CLIENTS WELCOME 2019 COUNTY MEIGS TO GUIDE YOUR We Accept: • Sliding Fee Scale • Private Health Insurance • Medicaid • Cash, Credit or Debit Card Accepted Funded in part by Gallia, Jackson, Meigs Alcohol Drug Addiction & Mental Health & the Athens, Hocking, Vinton Service Boards OH-70101989 3 Fused photo by Gary Coleman This fused photo takes images of Downtown Pomeroy from 132 years apart. WelcomeWelcome to Meigs County, where you will findto rich Meigsthan what they are used to.County history, rolling hills, the beautiful Ohio River, and a close- So whether it is your first time in Meigs County or you are knit community that is “obnoxiously proud” to call this part a regular visitor, there are many “can’t miss” stops while you of southeastern Ohio home.
    [Show full text]
  • Respondent PREAMBLE
    OHIOE.P.A. BEFORE THE OEC2 2 200~ OHIO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AG~~RrED [)jriEC10R'SJOURNAl In the Matter of: ~,~ i;'J; &-,.-,. ---~,:"""'£i Ohio Power Company Director's Final Findinas One Riverside Plaza and Orders Columbus, Ohio 43215 Respondent PREAMBLE These Director's Final Findings and Orders ("Orders") are hereby issued to Ohio Power Company acting in place of its former wholly-owned subsidiary, Southern Ohio Coal Company, pursuant to the authority invested in the Director of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency ("Ohio EPA") under Ohio Revised Code ("ORC") Chapter 6111. and Section 3745.01. PARTIES BOUND On March 22, 1996, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio entered a Consent Decree and Settlement Agreement (Case No. C2-96-0097) that required, among other actions, that Southern Ohio Coal Company ("SOCCo") implement a plan to restore two streams from the effects caused by SOCCo's release of mine water in the Summer of 1993 from its "Meigs Mine No. 31" located in Meigs County, Ohio. SOCCo's restoration obligations are also reflected in Final Findings and Orders issued by the Director on July 26, 1993. In Paragraph 106 of the Consent Decree, Ohio Power Company ("Ohio Power") guaranteed the full performance of all payment and work obligations of its then subsidiary, SOCCo. The parties have negotiated an Amended Consent Decree which has been submitted to the Court for approval. Respondent Ohio Power and the Director seek to conform the obligations imposed on SOCCo, and to be undertaken by Ohio Power, under the terms of the July 26, 1993 Orders and the terms of the Amended Consent Decree.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan for the Leading Creek Watershed
    A Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan for the Leading Creek Watershed A collaboration of the Meigs Soil and Water Conservation District and residents of the Leading Creek Watershed Leading Creek at River Mile 10.3 January 2005 Prepared by Cynthia Bauers Leading Creek Watershed Coordinator 33101 Hiland Road Pomeroy, Ohio 45769 Acknowledgments The Leading Creek Watershed Management Plan would not have been possible without financial and technical assistance from the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources- Division of Mineral Resources Management, and Division of Soil and Water. A special thanks to the following people who have spent time researching, writing, collecting and analyzing data, and assisting with public outreach activities: Staff of the Meigs Soil and Water Conservation District Mike Duhl, District Conservationist Opal Dyer, Program Administrator (retired) Jim Freeman, Wildlife Specialist/Watershed Coordinator Mike Gosnell, Watershed Technician Steve Jenkins, Program Administrator Vicki Morrow, Assistant Administrator Jenny Ridenour, Education Coordinator Barb Flowers, Division of Mineral Resources Management Mary Ann Borch, Division of Mineral Resources Management Nancy Seger, Division of Mineral Resources Management Dan Imhoff, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Rob Hamilton, Division of Soil and Water Jerry Iles, Ohio State University Extension Scott Miller and JB Hoy, Ohio University- ILGARD Mike Greenlee, Division of Wildlife Bill Bosworth, American Electric Power (retired) Bill Kurey, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Watershed community members I would especially like to thank the Meigs Soil and Water Board of Supervisors, Pauline Atkins, Bill Baer, Joe Bolin, Marco Jeffers, and Dick Sterrett, for giving me the opportunity to do something I love (playing in creeks) and for providing support even when I was working on things that were unfamiliar and may have even seemed strange.
    [Show full text]
  • Raccoon Creek Watershed, 2016 Athens, Gallia, Hocking, Jackson, Meigs, and Vinton Counties
    Biological and Water Quality Study of the Raccoon Creek Watershed, 2016 Athens, Gallia, Hocking, Jackson, Meigs, and Vinton Counties Raccoon Creek, 2016 Ohio EPA Technical Report AMS/2016‐RACCO‐2 Division of Surface Water Assessment and Modeling Section Draft January 2020 TMDL DEVELOPMENT | AMS/2016‐RACCO‐2 Draft Biological and Water Quality Study of the Raccoon Creek Watershed, 2016 January 2020 Table of Contents List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Components of an Ohio EPA Biological and Water Quality Survey .................................................................................. 10 What is a Biological and Water Quality Survey? .................................................................................................................. 10 Hierarchy of Indicators .................................................................................................................................................................. 10 Ohio Water Quality Standards: Designated Aquatic Life Use ......................................................................................... 12 Ohio Water Quality Standards: Non-Aquatic Life Uses ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Athens County Comprehensive Planning Staff Worked for a Council of Land Use Plan
    ATHENS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # EXECUTIVE SUMMARY …………………………………………………………………………………… 6 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………. 9 . Review of Process for Plan Preparation …………………………………………………………………… 9 Vision Statement…………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 Task Forces & Their Areas of Study ………………………………………………………………………. 12 Overview of Athens County ……………………………………………………………………………….. 13 CHAPTER 2: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE BY MARJORIE STONE ………………………………………… 17 CHAPTER 3: TRANSPORTATION ……………………………………………………………………………. 23 Statement of Purpose ……………………………………………………………………………………… 23 Process …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 23 Roadways-Present Conditions and Trends ………………………………………………………………… 24 Transportation Modes-Present Conditions & Trends …………………………………………………….. 28 Private Automobiles………………………………………………………………………………. 28 Public Transportation …………………………………………………………………………….. 29 Trucking ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 31 Bicycle Transportation …………………………………………………………………………… 31 Pedestrian Travel…………………………………………………………………………………. 33 Air Transportation ……………………………………………………………………………….. 34 Rail Transportation ……………………………………………………………………………… 36 Water Transportation …………………………………………………………………………….. 37 Plan Concept ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 37 Goals & Policies……………………………………………………………………………………………. 39 CHAPTER 4: ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES…………………………………………………… 43 Statement of Purpose ………………………………………………………………………………………. 43 Process …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 43 Background ……………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Setting and Water Quality of Selected Basins in the Active Goal-Mining Areas of Ohio, 1989-91, with a Summary of Water Quality for 1985-91
    Geologic Setting and Water Quality of Selected Basins in the Active Goal-Mining Areas of Ohio, 1989-91, with a Summary of Water Quality for 1985-91 By Alan C. Sedam and Donna S. Francy United States Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 93-4094 Prepared in cooperation with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Reclamation U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robert M. Hirsch, Acting Director Any use of trade names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1993 Copies of this report may be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Open-File Reports Section Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Purpose and scope 3 Description of study area 3 Acknowledgments 14 Methods of study - - - - 14 Water quality of the study area, 1989-91 16 Streamwater at long-term sites, 1989-91 - 16 Ground water 20 Geologic setting and water quality of selected basins 26 Conotton Creek basin 26 Geologic setting 26 Water quality 28 Streamwater 28 Ground water - - 29 Lower Wills Creek basin - - - 29 Geologic setting 35 Waterquality - - 35 Streamwater 36 Ground water 36 Upper Hocking River basin 37 Geologic setting 37 Waterquality - - - 43 Streamwater 44 Ground water 44 Yellow and Cross Creeks basin 49 Geologic setting 49 Waterquality- ___ _ .
    [Show full text]