Late Tremadocian–Early Floian Acritarchs from Graptolitic Shales of the Yinzhubu and Ningkuo Formations of Yiyang, South China

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Late Tremadocian–Early Floian Acritarchs from Graptolitic Shales of the Yinzhubu and Ningkuo Formations of Yiyang, South China Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 193 (2013) 1–14 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/revpalbo Research paper Late Tremadocian–early Floian acritarchs from graptolitic shales of the Yinzhubu and Ningkuo formations of Yiyang, South China Wenhui Wang a,c,⁎, Marco Vecoli b, Thijs R.A. Vandenbroucke b, Hongzhen Feng a, Lixia Li a, Jacques Verniers c a School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Hankou Street 22, 210093, Nanjing, China b Géosystèmes, UMR 8217 du CNRS, Université Lille 1, Avenue Paul Langevin, bâtiment SN5, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France c Research Unit of Paleontology, Department of Geology and Soil Sciences, Ghent University, Krijglsaan 281/S8, Ghent, 9000, Belgium article info abstract Article history: Acritarch assemblages are described here for the first time from the Early Ordovician Yinzhubu and Ningkuo Received 4 May 2012 formations of the Nanba section (Yiyang region, Hunan province, South China). Independent stratigraphical Received in revised form 19 November 2012 control is provided by co-occurring late Tremadocian–early Floian (early Arenig) graptolite and chitinozoan Accepted 19 January 2013 biozones. A very diverse association of 33 species attributed to 23 genera is identified, and three acritarch Available online 8 February 2013 assemblage zones are distinguished. These are comparable to coeval assemblages from several localities Keywords: worldwide. During the Early Ordovician the Yiyang area was at low latitudes. The acritarch association interestingly Late Tremadocian–early Floian shows a mixed character, comprising typical taxa from both cold-water and warm-water paleobioprovinces. South China © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. acritarch biostratigraphy paleogeography 1. Introduction named the trifidum microflora by Fortey et al. (1991) and dated to the latest Tremadocian, using graptolites. In their detailed investigation of Graptolitic shales of late Tremadocian–early Floian age are ex- the Skiddaw Group, Cooper et al. (1995) redefined the assemblage as posed in the Nanba Section, in the Yiyang region of the Hunan Prov- ‘messaoudii–trifidum’, providing an integrated graptolite and acritarch ince, South China (Fig. 1a,b). The succession comprises two litho- biozonation. Servais and Molyneux (1997) reviewed the taxonomic stratigraphic units: the Yinzhubu and the Ningkuo formations, which composition and stratigraphic occurrence of the assemblage, which occur in the lower and upper parts of the sequence respectively (Fig. 2). was re-named the ‘messaoudensis–trifidum’ assemblage. Molyneux et Previous studies on graptolites and chitinozoans have provided a bio- al. (2007) reviewed the occurrences of the messaoudensis–trifidum stratigraphic framework for the succession (Feng et al., 2009; Wang assemblage in England, Wales, southern Ireland, Belgium, Germany, et al., 2012). Five graptolite biozones (Adelograptus tenellus, Aorograptus Spain, Bohemia, Turkey, and Argentina and suggested that this peri- victoriae, Araneograptus murrayi, Hunnegraptus copiosus and Tetragraptus Gondwanan assemblage is of significant biostratigraphical and paleo- approximatus) and three chitinozoan biozones (Lagenochitina destombesi, geographic importance. Recent Argentinian studies have also referred Lagenochitina esthonica and Euconochitina symmetrica) have been recog- to the assemblage (Rubinstein et al., 2007; de la Puente and Rubinstein, nized, allowing precise and independent stratigraphic control throughout 2009; Toro et al., 2010). The assemblage has been described from middle the section. to high-latitude regions (listed above), that border the Gondwana super- Late Tremadocian–early Floian acritarch assemblages have been continent, as noted by Servais et al. (2003). previously described from many localities across the globe, showing Coeval, low-latitude deposits are characterized by a different their potential for long distance correlation, and eventually for the acritarch suite, the ‘Aryballomorpha–Athabascaella–Lua’ assemblage definition of formal acritarch biozonations. The messaoudensis–trifidum (AAL assemblage), defined by the co-occurrence of the three acritarch assemblage from the Tremadocian–Floian boundary typically occurs taxa. First described by Martin (1984, 1992) in the Tremadocian of in peri-Gondwana localities (Vanguestaine and Servais, 2002; Servais Alberta (Canada), the assemblage was subsequently reported from the et al., 2003). This assemblage was first described in the English Lake Tremadocian–Arenig boundary strata of Northeastern China (Martin District by Molyneux and Rushton (1988). Subsequently, it was re- and Yin, 1988) and from Tremadocian deposits in Texas, USA (Barker and Miller, 1989). Based on the paleogeographical reconstruction of Li and Powell, (2001), Li and Servais (2002) noted that all the known ⁎ Corresponding author at: School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Hankou street 22, 210093, Nanjing, China. Tel.: +86 2558611122. occurrences of the three characteristic genera of the AAL assemblage E-mail address: [email protected] (W. Wang). are from low latitude regions. Servais et al. (2003) noted that some of 0034-6667/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2013.01.005 2 W. Wang et al. / Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 193 (2013) 1–14 Fig. 1. Location map of the Nanba section, Yiyang area. The star represents the position of the studied section. 1. Gaoqiao, Ziyang, Shanxi Province (Hu, 1986); 2. Wangjiazhai, Youyang, Hubei Province (Brocke, 1997); 3. Ercun, Kunming, Yunnan Province (Fang, 1986); 4. Renmingqiao, Wuding, Yunnan Province (Gao, 1991); 5. Yinchunli, Luquan, Yunnan (Fang, 1986); 6. Wannike, Luquan, Hunan Province (Fang, 1986). Modified from Feng et al. (2009). the elements of the messaoudensis–trifidum assemblage have been and chitinozoan biostratigraphy from the same section provide reliable reported from the following mid latitude areas: southern Baltica biostratigraphic constraints (Feng et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2012). The (Bagnoli et al., 1988; Raevskaya, 1999), the Yangtze Platform, Southwest South China terrane can be subdivided in three main units along an China (Brocke, 1997)andIran(Ghavidel-Syooki, 1995, 2000). Moreover, east–west transect (Fig. 1a): the Yangtze Platform, the Jiangnan Slope isolated elements of the AAL assemblage can also co-occur with the and the Southeast Basin, which are characterized by different facies elements from the high latitude assemblage in mid latitude regions, associations, corresponding to specific sedimentary environments. producing ‘mixed assemblages’ characterized by both ‘cold-water’ and Previous studies concerning Early-Middle Ordovician acritarchs were ‘warm-water’ forms (Servais et al., 2004). Vecoli (2004) even reported carried out in the Jianshan–Changshan–Yushan (JCY) area in the east the occurrence of Athabascaella from the Tremadocian of southern Tunisia, of the Jiangnan Region (Huang, 1991; Huang et al., 1994; Xu and You, located at high paleolatitudes during Ordovician times. 2001; Xu et al., 2002; Yin and Playford, 2003; Yan et al., 2011), and in In their review paper, Li et al. (2002) presented a comprehensive the Sandu area in the south–west of the Jiangnan Region (Li, 1991; Xu, bibliographic list of publications on Chinese Paleozoic acritarchs, 1995, 1996, 1999, 2001; Xu et al., 1995). The Nanba section is located pointing out that papers concerning Ordovician acritarchs occupied in the north of the Jiangnan Region and is characterized by slope facies the largest portion of all the papers. However, palynological data sediments (Figs. 1b, 2). The Nanba section consists of two formations: from late Tremadocian–early Floian strata are still rather scarce in the Yinzhubu Formation and the Ningkuo Formation (Fig. 2). Lithologi- China. In north China, besides the studies mentioned above, there cally, the lowest part of the Yinzhubu Formation is characterized by gray are only two reports from the Hunjiang region (Jilin Province), on micritic limestone, passing into mudstones interbedded with silty mud- the North China Plate (Yin, 1985, 1986). More than 80% of papers on stones higher in the formation. The overlying Ningkuo Formation Chinese Ordovician acritarchs concern South China localities, i.e., the is dominated by grayish or yellowish green mudstones. Sedimentary Ziyang area/Shanxi Province (Hu, 1986); the Kunming-Wuding area/ structures and tube-like trace fossils in the Ningkuo Formation suggest Yunnan Province (Fang, 1986; Gao, 1991), and the Hubei Province a more dynamic sedimentary environment. This paper uses a three- (Brocke, 1997)(Fig. 1b). More specifically, most of the reports concern fold division of the Tremadocian as suggested by Bergström et al. localities in the Yangtze Platform, while there are no acritarch records (2009);alsoseeWang et al. (2012). The time slices (TS) by Webby of late Tremadocian–early Floian strata from the Jiannan Slope of the et al. (2004) are also listed in the correlation charts for comparison. South China terrane. It should be noted that, with few exceptions, precise independent chronostratigraphic control on the published late 3. Graptolite and chitinozoan biozonation Tremadocian–early Floian acritarch assemblages from China, and else- where, is scarce. The Yinzhubu Formation and the Ningkuo Formation are dated In this study, for the first time, acritarch assemblages are recorded
Recommended publications
  • Diversity Partitioning During the Cambrian Radiation
    Diversity partitioning during the Cambrian radiation Lin Naa,1 and Wolfgang Kiesslinga,b aGeoZentrum Nordbayern, Paleobiology and Paleoenvironments, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; and bMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany Edited by Douglas H. Erwin, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, and accepted by the Editorial Board March 10, 2015 (received for review January 2, 2015) The fossil record offers unique insights into the environmental and Results geographic partitioning of biodiversity during global diversifica- Raw gamma diversity exhibits a strong increase in the first three tions. We explored biodiversity patterns during the Cambrian Cambrian stages (informally referred to as early Cambrian in this radiation, the most dramatic radiation in Earth history. We as- work) (Fig. 1A). Gamma diversity dropped in Stage 4 and de- sessed how the overall increase in global diversity was partitioned clined further through the rest of the Cambrian. The pattern is between within-community (alpha) and between-community (beta) robust to sampling standardization (Fig. 1B) and insensitive to components and how beta diversity was partitioned among environ- including or excluding the archaeocyath sponges, which are po- ments and geographic regions. Changes in gamma diversity in the tentially oversplit (16). Alpha and beta diversity increased from Cambrian were chiefly driven by changes in beta diversity. The the Fortunian to Stage 3, and fluctuated erratically through the combined trajectories of alpha and beta diversity during the initial following stages (Fig. 2). Our estimate of alpha (and indirectly diversification suggest low competition and high predation within beta) diversity is based on the number of genera in published communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Polar Front Shift and Atmospheric CO During the Glacial Maximum of the Early Paleozoic Icehouse
    Polar front shift and atmospheric CO2 during the glacial maximum of the Early Paleozoic Icehouse Thijs R. A. Vandenbrouckea,b,c,1,2, Howard A. Armstronga,1, Mark Williamsd,e,1, Florentin Parisf, Jan A. Zalasiewiczd, Koen Sabbeg, Jaak Nõlvakh, Thomas J. Challandsa,i, Jacques Verniersb, and Thomas Servaisc aPalaeoClimate Group, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Science Labs, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom; bResearch Unit Palaeontology, Department of Geology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; cGéosystèmes, Université Lille 1, Formation de Recherche en Evolution 3298 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Avenue Paul Langevin, bâtiment SN5, 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France; dDepartment of Geology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, United Kingdom; eBritish Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, NG12 5GG, United Kingdom; fGéosciences, Université de Rennes I, Unité Mixte de Recherche 6118 du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes-cedex, France; gProtistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; hInstitute of Geology, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia; and iTotal E&P UK Limited, Geoscience Research Centre, Crawpeel Road, Aberdeen AB12 3FG, United Kingdom Edited by Jeffrey Kiehl, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, and accepted by the Editorial Board July 1, 2010 (received for review March 16, 2010) Our new data address the paradox of Late Ordovician glaciation PAL (5). A GCM experiment parameterized with the same p × under supposedly high CO2 (8 to 22 PAL: preindustrial atmo- pCO2 value, high relative sea level, and a modern equator-to-pole spheric level).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ordovician Succession Adjacent to Hinlopenstretet, Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen
    1 2 The Ordovician succession adjacent to Hinlopenstretet, Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen 3 4 Björn Kröger1, Seth Finnegan2, Franziska Franeck3, Melanie J. Hopkins4 5 6 Abstract: The Ordovician sections along the western shore of the Hinlopen Strait, Ny 7 Friesland, were discovered in the late 1960s and since then prompted numerous 8 paleontological publications; several of them are now classical for the paleontology of 9 Ordovician trilobites, and Ordovician paleogeography and stratigraphy. Our 2016 expedition 10 aimed in a major recollection and reappraisal of the classical sites. Here we provide a first 11 high-resolution lithological description of the Kirtonryggen and Valhallfonna formations 12 (Tremadocian –Darriwilian), which together comprise a thickness of 843 m, a revised bio-, 13 and lithostratigraphy, and an interpretation of the depositional sequences. We find that the 14 sedimentary succession is very similar to successions of eastern Laurentia; its Tremadocian 15 and early Floian part is composed of predominantly peritidal dolostones and limestones 16 characterized by ribbon carbonates, intraclastic conglomerates, microbial laminites, and 17 stromatolites, and its late Floian to Darriwilian part is composed of fossil-rich, bioturbated, 18 cherty mud-wackestone, skeletal grainstone and shale, with local siltstone and glauconitic 19 horizons. The succession can be subdivided into five third-order depositional sequences, 20 which are interpreted as representing the SAUK IIIB Supersequence known from elsewhere 21 on the Laurentian
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE V
    GSA GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE v. 4.0 CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST HIST. ANOM. (Ma) ANOM. CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 66.0 541 CALABRIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE* 1.8 31 C31 MAASTRICHTIAN 252 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 Lopin- 254 32 C32 72.1 635 2A C2A PIACENZIAN WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 3.6 gian 33 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN CAPITANIAN NEOPRO- 5 C3 CAMPANIAN Guada- 265 750 CRYOGENIAN 5.3 80 C33 WORDIAN TEROZOIC 3A MESSINIAN LATE lupian 269 C3A 83.6 ROADIAN 272 850 7.2 SANTONIAN 4 KUNGURIAN C4 86.3 279 TONIAN CONIACIAN 280 4A Cisura- C4A TORTONIAN 90 89.8 1000 1000 PERMIAN ARTINSKIAN 10 5 TURONIAN lian C5 93.9 290 SAKMARIAN STENIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 296 SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 ASSELIAN 299 5A 100 100 300 GZHELIAN 1200 C5A 13.8 LATE 304 KASIMOVIAN 307 1250 MESOPRO- 15 LANGHIAN ECTASIAN 5B C5B ALBIAN MIDDLE MOSCOVIAN 16.0 TEROZOIC 5C C5C 110 VANIAN 315 PENNSYL- 1400 EARLY 5D C5D MIOCENE 113 320 BASHKIRIAN 323 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 1500 CALYMMIAN 6 C6 APTIAN LATE 20 120 331 6A C6A 20.4 EARLY 1600 M0r 126 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 MIDDLE VISEAN MISSIS- M3 BARREMIAN SIPPIAN STATHERIAN C6C 23.0 6C 130 M5 CRETACEOUS 131 347 1750 HAUTERIVIAN 7 C7 CARBONIFEROUS EARLY TOURNAISIAN 1800 M10 134 25 7A C7A 359 8 C8 CHATTIAN VALANGINIAN M12 360 140 M14 139 FAMENNIAN OROSIRIAN 9 C9 M16 28.1 M18 BERRIASIAN 2000 PROTEROZOIC 10 C10 LATE
    [Show full text]
  • Acritarchsa Review
    Biol. Rev. (1993), 68, pp. 475-538 475 Printed in Great Britain ACRITARCHS: A REVIEW B y FRANCINE MARTIN Département de Paléontologie, Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique, rue Vautier 29, R-1040 B ruxelles, Belgium (Received 21 Ja n u a ry 1993; accepted 23 M arch 1993) CONTENTS I. Introduction 47^ II. How to find, isolate and recognize an acritarch ........ 476 (1) Sampling. ........................................ • 47Ó (2) Preparation .............. 47$ (3) Size and morphology .................................................. 479 (4) Organic wall 4^7 (i) Sporopollenin-like material .......... 487 (ii) Thermal alteration ............ 489 III. Biological affinities. ............. 491 (1) Before and after Evitt (1963) ........... 491 (2) Reassessment of some acritarchs .......... 493 (i) Links with dinoflagellates.............................................................. 494 (ii) Links with prasinophytes ......................................................................... 497 (iii) Enigmatic sphaeromorphs .......... 499 (iv) Acritarchs, euglenoids or single spore-like bodies ? ...... 501 (v) Recent incertae sedis and crustacean eggs........ 501 IV. Reworking and palaeoecology ........... 5° 2 (1) Durable microfossils ............ 502 (2) Life-style of acritarchs ............ 503 V. Acritarchs through geological time .......... 504 (1) Precambrian .............. 5°5 (i) Before acritarchs ............ 5°6 (ii) Appearance of acritarchs ........... 506 (2) Precambrian-Cambrian boundary ......................................................5°9
    [Show full text]
  • (Floian) Conodont Fauna from the Eastern Cordillera of Peru (Central Andean Basin) Geologica Acta: an International Earth Science Journal, Vol
    Geologica Acta: an international earth science journal ISSN: 1695-6133 [email protected] Universitat de Barcelona España GUTIÉRREZ-MARCO, J.C.; ALBANESI, G.L.; SARMIENTO, G.N.; CARLOTTO, V. An Early Ordovician (Floian) Conodont Fauna from the Eastern Cordillera of Peru (Central Andean Basin) Geologica Acta: an international earth science journal, vol. 6, núm. 2, junio, 2008, pp. 147-160 Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=50513115004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Geologica Acta, Vol.6, Nº 2, June 2008, 147-160 DOI: 10.1344/105.000000248 Available online at www.geologica-acta.com An Early Ordovician (Floian) Conodont Fauna from the Eastern Cordillera of Peru (Central Andean Basin) 1 2 1 3,4 J.C. GUTIÉRREZ-MARCO G.L. ALBANESI G.N. SARMIENTO and V. CARLOTTO 1 Instituto de Geología Económica (CSIC-UCM). Facultad de Ciencias Geológicas 28040 Madrid, Spain. Gutiérrez-Marco E-mail: [email protected] Sarmiento E-mail: [email protected] 2 CONICET-CICTERRA, Museo de Paleontología Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Casilla de Correo 1598, 5000 Córdoba, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] 3 INGEMMET Avenida Canadá 1740, San Borja, Lima, Peru. E-mail: [email protected] 4 Departamento de Geología, Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco Avda. de la Cultura 733, Cuzco, Perú ABSTRACT Late Floian conodonts are recorded from a thin limestone lens intercalated in the lower part of the San José For- mation at the Carcel Puncco section (Inambari River), Eastern Cordillera of Peru.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Meeting 2014
    The Palaeontological Association 58th Annual Meeting 16th–19th December 2014 University of Leeds PROGRAMME abstracts and AGM papers Public transport to the University of Leeds BY TRAIN: FROM TRAIN STATION ON FOOT: Leeds Train Station links regularly to all major UK cities. You The University campus is a 20 minute walk from the train can get from the station to the campus on foot, by taxi or by station. The map below will help you find your way. bus. A taxi ride will take about 10 minutes and it will cost Leave the station through the exit facing the main concourse. approximately £5. Turn left past the bus stops and walk down towards City Square. Keeping City Square on your left, walk straight up FROM TRAIN STATION BY BUS: Park Row. At the top of the road turn right onto The Headrow, We advise you to take bus number 1 which departs from passing The Light shopping centre on your left. After The Light Infirmary Street. The bus runs approximately every 10 minutes turn left onto Woodhouse Lane to continue uphill. Keep going, and the journey takes 10 minutes. passing Morrisons, Leeds Metropolitan and the Dry Dock You should get off the bus just outside the Parkinson Building. boat pub heading for the large white clock tower. This is the (There is also the £1 Leeds City Bus which takes you from the Parkinson building. train station to the lower end of campus but the journey time is much longer). BY COACH: If you arrive by coach you can catch bus numbers 6,28 or 97 to the University (Parkinson Building).
    [Show full text]
  • International Chronostratigraphic Chart
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2014/02 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Erathem / Era System / Period GSSP GSSP age (Ma) GSSP GSSA EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon GSSP age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 ~ 541.0 ±1.0 Holocene Ediacaran 0.0117 Tithonian Upper 152.1 ±0.9 Famennian ~ 635 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Neo- Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 850 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 Callovian 166.1 ±1.2 Quaternary Gelasian 2.58 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.62 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Langhian Sinemurian Proterozoic Neogene 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Hettangian 2050 Burdigalian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 28.1 Gorstian Oligocene Upper Norian 427.4 ±0.5 2500 Rupelian Wenlock Homerian
    [Show full text]
  • Paleogeographic Maps Earth History
    History of the Earth Age AGE Eon Era Period Period Epoch Stage Paleogeographic Maps Earth History (Ma) Era (Ma) Holocene Neogene Quaternary* Pleistocene Calabrian/Gelasian Piacenzian 2.6 Cenozoic Pliocene Zanclean Paleogene Messinian 5.3 L Tortonian 100 Cretaceous Serravallian Miocene M Langhian E Burdigalian Jurassic Neogene Aquitanian 200 23 L Chattian Triassic Oligocene E Rupelian Permian 34 Early Neogene 300 L Priabonian Bartonian Carboniferous Cenozoic M Eocene Lutetian 400 Phanerozoic Devonian E Ypresian Silurian Paleogene L Thanetian 56 PaleozoicOrdovician Mesozoic Paleocene M Selandian 500 E Danian Cambrian 66 Maastrichtian Ediacaran 600 Campanian Late Santonian 700 Coniacian Turonian Cenomanian Late Cretaceous 100 800 Cryogenian Albian 900 Neoproterozoic Tonian Cretaceous Aptian Early 1000 Barremian Hauterivian Valanginian 1100 Stenian Berriasian 146 Tithonian Early Cretaceous 1200 Late Kimmeridgian Oxfordian 161 Callovian Mesozoic 1300 Ectasian Bathonian Middle Bajocian Aalenian 176 1400 Toarcian Jurassic Mesoproterozoic Early Pliensbachian 1500 Sinemurian Hettangian Calymmian 200 Rhaetian 1600 Proterozoic Norian Late 1700 Statherian Carnian 228 1800 Ladinian Late Triassic Triassic Middle Anisian 1900 245 Olenekian Orosirian Early Induan Changhsingian 251 2000 Lopingian Wuchiapingian 260 Capitanian Guadalupian Wordian/Roadian 2100 271 Kungurian Paleoproterozoic Rhyacian Artinskian 2200 Permian Cisuralian Sakmarian Middle Permian 2300 Asselian 299 Late Gzhelian Kasimovian 2400 Siderian Middle Moscovian Penn- sylvanian Early Bashkirian
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Geologic Time Scale Cenozoic Mesozoic Paleozoic Precambrian Magnetic Magnetic Bdy
    2009 GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN MAGNETIC MAGNETIC BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE . N PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) HIST. HIST. ANOM. ANOM. (Ma) CHRON. CHRO HOLOCENE 65.5 1 C1 QUATER- 0.01 30 C30 542 CALABRIAN MAASTRICHTIAN NARY PLEISTOCENE 1.8 31 C31 251 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 70.6 254 2A PIACENZIAN 32 C32 L 630 C2A 3.6 WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN 33 CAMPANIAN CAPITANIAN 5 C3 5.3 266 750 NEOPRO- CRYOGENIAN 80 C33 M WORDIAN MESSINIAN LATE 268 TEROZOIC 3A C3A 83.5 ROADIAN 7.2 SANTONIAN 271 85.8 KUNGURIAN 850 4 276 C4 CONIACIAN 280 4A 89.3 ARTINSKIAN TONIAN C4A L TORTONIAN 90 284 TURONIAN PERMIAN 10 5 93.5 E 1000 1000 C5 SAKMARIAN 11.6 CENOMANIAN 297 99.6 ASSELIAN STENIAN SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 299.0 5A 100 300 GZELIAN C5A 13.8 M KASIMOVIAN 304 1200 PENNSYL- 306 1250 15 5B LANGHIAN ALBIAN MOSCOVIAN MESOPRO- C5B VANIAN 312 ECTASIAN 5C 16.0 110 BASHKIRIAN TEROZOIC C5C 112 5D C5D MIOCENE 320 318 1400 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 326 6 C6 APTIAN 20 120 1500 CALYMMIAN E 20.4 6A C6A EARLY MISSIS- M0r 125 VISEAN 1600 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 SIPPIAN M3 BARREMIAN C6C 23.0 345 6C CRETACEOUS 130 M5 130 STATHERIAN CARBONIFEROUS TOURNAISIAN 7 C7 HAUTERIVIAN 1750 25 7A M10 C7A 136 359 8 C8 L CHATTIAN M12 VALANGINIAN 360 L 1800 140 M14 140 9 C9 M16 FAMENNIAN BERRIASIAN M18 PROTEROZOIC OROSIRIAN 10 C10 28.4 145.5 M20 2000 30 11 C11 TITHONIAN 374 PALEOPRO- 150 M22 2050 12 E RUPELIAN
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical List
    LIST E - GEOLOGIC AGE (STRATIGRAPHIC) TERMS - ALPHABETICAL LIST Age Unit Broader Term Age Unit Broader Term Aalenian Middle Jurassic Brunhes Chron upper Quaternary Acadian Cambrian Bull Lake Glaciation upper Quaternary Acheulian Paleolithic Bunter Lower Triassic Adelaidean Proterozoic Burdigalian lower Miocene Aeronian Llandovery Calabrian lower Pleistocene Aftonian lower Pleistocene Callovian Middle Jurassic Akchagylian upper Pliocene Calymmian Mesoproterozoic Albian Lower Cretaceous Cambrian Paleozoic Aldanian Lower Cambrian Campanian Upper Cretaceous Alexandrian Lower Silurian Capitanian Guadalupian Algonkian Proterozoic Caradocian Upper Ordovician Allerod upper Weichselian Carboniferous Paleozoic Altonian lower Miocene Carixian Lower Jurassic Ancylus Lake lower Holocene Carnian Upper Triassic Anglian Quaternary Carpentarian Paleoproterozoic Anisian Middle Triassic Castlecliffian Pleistocene Aphebian Paleoproterozoic Cayugan Upper Silurian Aptian Lower Cretaceous Cenomanian Upper Cretaceous Aquitanian lower Miocene *Cenozoic Aragonian Miocene Central Polish Glaciation Pleistocene Archean Precambrian Chadronian upper Eocene Arenigian Lower Ordovician Chalcolithic Cenozoic Argovian Upper Jurassic Champlainian Middle Ordovician Arikareean Tertiary Changhsingian Lopingian Ariyalur Stage Upper Cretaceous Chattian upper Oligocene Artinskian Cisuralian Chazyan Middle Ordovician Asbian Lower Carboniferous Chesterian Upper Mississippian Ashgillian Upper Ordovician Cimmerian Pliocene Asselian Cisuralian Cincinnatian Upper Ordovician Astian upper
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Ordovician Glaciation in Sw Libya – a Subsurface Perspective
    J.C. Gutiérrez-Marco, I. Rábano and D. García-Bellido (eds.), Ordovician of the World. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, 14. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid. ISBN 978-84-7840-857-3 © Instituto Geológico y Minero de España 2011 ICE IN THE SAHARA: THE UPPER ORDOVICIAN GLACIATION IN SW LIBYA – A SUBSURFACE PERSPECTIVE N.D. McDougall1 and R. Gruenwald2 1 Repsol Exploración, Paseo de la Castellana 280, 28046 Madrid, Spain. [email protected] 2 REMSA, Dhat El-Imad Complex, Tower 3, Floor 9, Tripoli, Libya. Keywords: Ordovician, Libya, glaciation, Mamuniyat, Melaz Shugran, Hirnantian. INTRODUCTION An Upper Ordovician glacial episode is widely recognized as a significant event in the geological history of the Lower Paleozoic. This is especially so in the case of the Saharan Platform where Upper Ordovician sediments are well developed and represent a major target for hydrocarbon exploration. This paper is a brief summary of the results of fieldwork, in outcrops across SW Libya, together with the analysis of cores, hundreds of well logs (including many high quality image logs) and seismic lines focused on the uppermost Ordovician of the Murzuq Basin. STRATIGRAPHIC FRAMEWORK The uppermost Ordovician section is the youngest of three major sequences recognized widely across the entire Saharan Platform: Sequence CO1: Unconformably overlies the Precambrian or Infracambrian basement. It comprises the possible Upper Cambrian to Lowermost Ordovician Hassaouna Formation. Sequence CO2: Truncates CO1 along a low angle, Type II unconformity. It comprises the laterally extensive and distinctive Lower Ordovician (Tremadocian-Floian?) Achebayat Formation overlain, along a probable transgressive surface of erosion, by interbedded burrowed sandstones, cross-bedded channel-fill sandstones and mudstones of Middle Ordovician age (Dapingian-Sandbian), known as the Hawaz Formation, and interpreted as shallow-marine sediments deposited within a megaestuary or gulf.
    [Show full text]