Induction of Cell Growth Regulatory Genes by P53
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CANCER RESEARCH 56. 5384-5390. December 1. 996] Induction of Cell Growth Regulatory Genes by p53 Stephen L. Madden,1 Elizabeth A. Galella, Deborah Riley, Arthur H. Bertelsen, and Gary A. Beaudry Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology. PharmaGenics. Inc., Allendale. New Jersey 07401 ABSTRACT kinase inhibitor by directly interacting with cyclin-dependent kinase proteins during progression of the cell cycle (20). Overexpressiom of Transcriptionally regulated growth-response genes play a pivotal role @2jWAF@@'I via transfection suppresses cell growth in a wide array in the determination of the fate of a cell.p53 is known to transcriptionally of cancer cell lines. In contrast, MDM2 functions by negatively regulate genes important in regulating cell growth potential. Using differ ential reverse transcription-PCR analysis of rat embryo fibroblast cells regulating p53 activity, and overexpression of MDM2 leads to un containing a temperature-sensitive p53 allele, we were able to isolate controlled cell growth and tumorigenesis (8). However, p53-induced several transcripts up-regulated specifically in cells harboring functional transcriptional responses appear ill-conserved, suggesting that cell PS3 protein. Two of these genes, SM2Oand microsomal epoxide hydrolase type-, genetic-, and species-dependent factors may contribute to p53 (mElt), are previously described genes. Two previously uncharacterized responsiveness; for example, both @2JwAFl/cIPIand MDM2 are tran cDNAs, cell growth regulatory (CGR) genes CGRJJ and CGRJ9, were scriptionally activated in a p53-dependent manner in rodent cells isolated. The predicted amino acid sequence of these novel proteins con harboring a temperature-sensitive p53 allele, but only MDM2 is tamknownmotifs;EF-handdomains(CGR11)anda ring-fingerdomaln induced in an analogous human system (30). In addition, activation of (CGRJ9),suggestiveoffunction. CGRJJand CGRJ9appearto beprimary @2jWAF1@@'I has been shown to be both p53-dependent and -mdc response genes expressed to moderate levels in functional p53 cells. Both pendent, suggesting alternate pathways for regulation of its expression CGRIJ and CGRJ9 are able to inhibit the growth of several cell lines. (31, 32). Furthermore, it appears that the levels of apoptotic regulatory gene products, such as BCL2 or E1B, are influential in determining if INTRODUCTION a cell will undergo p53-dependent growth arrest or apoptosis (9, 33). These results suggest that a complex regulatory cascade, using nu Significant advances have been made recently toward the identifi merous effector gene products, determines cell growth potential. The cation of numerous potential growth effectors within cells. Although complexities of cell growth regulation underscores the need to further previous analyses have evaluated the phenotypic effects of cellular define the relevant molecular determinants. environment, growth factors and stress, it is only recently that the The well-characterized murine temperature-sensitive p53 mutation underlying molecular events responsible for perturbing cell growth (VAL13S) has been used to further characterize potential transcrip are beginning to be defined. In a large number of cases, the cause of tional responses of wild-type p53 protein. Growth of rat embryo a particular cellular growth response can be attributed to transcrip fibroblast cells (REF-l 12) transformed with activated RAS and p.53- tional artenuation (1, 2). Indeed, the recent gene discoveries directly VAL135 is temperature sensitive ( 10, 34). Growth of REF- 112 cells relevant to cell cycle regulation have been based, to a significant at 38°Cmaintains the p53 protein in a nonfunctional conformation degree, on differential gene expression analyses (2—4). complexed with HSP7O in the cytoplasm (10, 35). When the cells are The p53 gene remains the most frequenfly mutated gene in human shifted to 32°C,the p53 protein adopts a functional, wild type-like cancers, undoubtedly reflecting an important regulatory function for conformation, migrates into the nucleus, and regulates the transcrip this gene in controlling cell growth (reviewed in Ref. 5). p53 function tion of target genes (10). Under these latter conditions, the cells were can be attenuated by interaction with viral or cellular proteins (6—9) initially described as being growth-arrested predominately in the G1 and cytoplasmic sequestration (10, 11), ultimately leading to alter phase of the cell cycle (34). However, we have observed that a ations in cell growth potential. Although p53 is thought to exert significant population of cells undergo apoptosis when maintained at growth-regulatory functions in response to DNA damage and by 32°C.DNA laddering indicative of apoptotic cells was observed as directly inhibiting DNA replication ( 12, 13) or inducing apoptosis (9), early as 6 h after shift of cells to the permissive temperature (data not a large body of data indicates that the primary function of p53 is to shown).2 Because previous studies have suggested that p53-induced transcriptionally regulate downstream effector genes. p53 contains a growth arrest and apoptosis might be in distinct and divergent path potent transcriptional activation domain and is able to bind DNA in a ways (12, 31, 36, 37), both apoptotic-specific as well as growth sequence-specific manner (14—16), allowing for both transcriptional arrest-specific genes might be elevated in this system upon shift of activation and repression of target genes (17, 18). p53-mediated p53 to a functional conformation. Utilizing differential display anal transcriptional repression has also been proposed to occur via p53 ysis of temperature-sensitive, p53-induced (32°C), and uninduced protein interaction with general transcription factors (19). (38°C)REF-l 12 cells, we have been able to demonstrate several Identification of the p53 transcriptionally responsive genes genes the transcript levels of which are significantly elevated in the p2IW@)l (2, 20), MDM2 (1, 8), GADD45 (21, 22), H/C (23), presence of functional p53. Two of these genes are previously unde cyclin G (24, 25), and BAX (26—29),the products of which have been scribed and encode proteins containing known functional motifs. We suggested to have direct effects on cell growth, emphasizes the pivotal demonstrate here that these genes have growth-suppressive potential role of pS3 in modulating expression levels of growth-response genes. in several cell lines examined. To date, two of the best characterized direct effectors of cell growth that are transcriptionally regulated by p53 include @2jWAFI/CIPI(2, MATERIALS AND METHODS 20) and MDM2 (I, 8). @2jWAFI/CIPlfunctions as a cyclin-dependent Cell Culture. Rat embryo fibroblast cells REF-I 12 (p53-VAL135) and Received 5/3 1/96; accepted 10/2/96. REF-132 [p53-PHE132; kindly provided by B. Vogelstein (Johns Hopkins The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page University, Baltimore, MD) and M. Orem (Weizmanm Institute, Rehovot, charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with Israel)1,were grown in DMEM containing 10%fetal bovine serum in 5% CO2 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. @ To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Molecular and @ Cellular Biology, PharmaGenics, Inc., 4 Pearl Court, Allendale, NJ 07401. 2 Thou, personal communication. 5384 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1996 American Association for Cancer Research. CELL GROWTH REGULATORY GENES a b c 0 1 2 4 6 810 32 38 3238 @NlIWAF1 — iii cycin Fig. I. Characterization of REF-112 RNA. a, kinetics of @2JwAFI/cIP1induction. Total RNA from REF-l 12 cells maintained at 32°Cfor the indicated times (h) was probed with ratp21WAFI@Cll'IcDNA. b, cyclin G RT-PCR. Total RNA harvested from REF-l 12 cells maintained at 38°C,or 32°Cfor 8 h, was reverse-transcribed with an anchored olido(dT) primer. PCR was performed with this primer and a primer specific for the 3' end of rat cyclin G. The arrowhead shows an —300-bp,differentiallyexpressed rat cyclimG RT-PCR product. c, Northern analysis of total RNA from REF-112 cells. The cyclin G RT-PCR cDNA described in b was used as a probe for RNA isolated from 38°C-or 32°C-maintained REF-i 12 cells. at either 38°Cor32°C.Cellswere split and seeded 48 h before any temperature performed in a thermocycler for 40 cycles of: 94°Cfor 3 s, 40°Cfor 2 mm, and shifts. Temperature shifts were performed by simple transfer of subconfluent 72°Cfor 30 s. Reactions were terminated by the addition of 38% formamide, flasks to preequilibrated incubators without media changes. For transfections, 8 mr@iEDTA, 0.02% bromphenol blue, and xylene cylanol. Samples were 4 X iO@cells(T98G and SW480 cells) or 0.8 X l0@cells (SKOV3-IP1) were heated for 2 mm at 70°Cand run on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. PCR seeded in six-well dishes. Transfections were performed using lipofectin (Life products were purified after drying the gel onto Whatmann 3MM paper and Technologies, Inc.) as described by the manufacturer. Briefly, 40 @.dofreduced exposure to film. Excised bands were resuspended in 120p.1of H20 for 10mm serum medium (Optimem; Life Technologies, Inc.) was added to 2 @.tgofDNA at room temperature, followed by 15 mm of boiling. Debris was pelleted by (pCEP4 derivatives; InVitrogen). A 50-pd mixture containing 10 @doflipo centrifugation, and 10 p.1 of 3 M sodium acetate, 5 p.1 of 10 mg/mI glycogen, fectin and 40 ,.d of Optimem was added to the DNA mixture. After a 15-ruin and 400 p.1of ethanol were added to 100 p.1of the eluted DNA. DNA was room temperature incubation, 1 ml of Optimem was added, and the mixture allowed to precipitate overnight at —20°C.TheDNA was pelleted, amplified was overlayed onto Optimem-washed cells. Cells were allowed to incubate for using the same primers used for the original RT-PCR, gel purified, and cloned 5 h in a 37°C/5% CO2 incubator, following which the transfection mixture was into pCRH (InVitrogen).