DOCSLIB.ORG

Model Class Screening Report for Land-Based Commercial Guiding Activities in the Mountain National Parks of Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Model Class Screening Report for Land-Based Commercial Guiding Activities in the Mountain National Parks of Canada Model Class Screening Report for Land-based Commercial Guiding Activities in the Mountain National Parks of Canada Banff National Park of Canada, Glacier National Park of Canada, Jasper National Park of Canada, Kootenay National Park of Canada, Mount Revelstoke National Park of Canada, Yoho National Park of Canada, and Waterton Lakes National Park of Canada Parks Canada Agency September 2004 Model Class Screening Report September 2004 Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 5 ACRONYMS..................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 2 1.1. MANAGEMENT OF NATIONAL PARKS................................................................... 3 1.1.1. Managing for Ecological Integrity ............................................................. 3 1.1.2. Managing for Cultural Resources .............................................................. 3 1.1.3. Managing for Visitor Experience................................................................ 4 1.1.4. Park Management Plans............................................................................. 4 1.2. APPLICABILITY OF THE CLASS SCREENING PROCESS TO LAND-BASED COMMERCIAL GUIDING ACTIVITIES..................................................................... 5 1.3. KEY ISSUES AND CHALLENGES ............................................................................ 6 1.4. DEVELOPMENT OF THE CLASS SCREENING .......................................................... 7 1.5. APPLICATION OF THE MCSR TO THE BUSINESS LICENCE PROCESS ..................... 9 1.5.1. Integration of Environmental Assessment and Business Licence Administrative Process ............................................................................... 9 1.5.2. Application of Section 13.1 Inclusion List Regulations............................ 10 1.5.3. Class Screening Project Report................................................................ 11 1.5.4. Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................ 12 1.6. PROJECTS SUBJECT TO THE MODEL CLASS SCREENING ..................................... 12 1.6.1. Projects subject to the Act......................................................................... 12 1.6.2. Projects excluded from the Act ................................................................. 12 1.6.3. Projects subject to the MCSR ................................................................... 13 1.6.4. Projects not suited to the MCSR ............................................................... 13 1.7. SCOPE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT .................................................. 16 1.7.1. Scope of Factors to be Considered ........................................................... 16 1.7.2. Valued Ecosystem Components ................................................................ 16 1.7.3. Identification of Potential Environmental Effects and Standard Mitigation Practices ................................................................................................... 18 1.7.4. Definition and Evaluation of Significant Environmental Effects.............. 20 2. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ........................................................................... 21 2.1. LAND USE AND MANAGEMENT IN THE NATIONAL PARKS ................................. 21 2.1.1. National Park Zoning System ................................................................... 22 2.1.2. Land Management Units in National Parks ............................................. 23 2.1.3. Aboriginal Land Use in National Parks ................................................... 24 2.2. DESCRIPTION OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES .................................. 24 2.2.1. Wildlife...................................................................................................... 24 2.2.2. Soil and Vegetation................................................................................... 28 2.2.3. Water Quality............................................................................................ 40 Model Class Screening Report September 2004 2.2.4. Cultural Resources.................................................................................... 42 2.2.5. Visitor Experience..................................................................................... 48 3. ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ............................................... 50 3.1. DESCRIPTIONS OF ACTIVITIES............................................................................ 50 3.1.1. Unique Characteristics of Commercial Guiding Activities ...................... 50 3.1.2. Guided Hiking........................................................................................... 51 3.1.3. Mountain Guiding..................................................................................... 52 3.1.4. Horse Outfitting ........................................................................................ 52 3.1.5. Overnight Use ........................................................................................... 53 3.1.6. Winter Activities........................................................................................ 53 3.2. ACTIVITY SPECIFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 54 3.2.1. Introduction............................................................................................... 54 3.2.2. Wildlife...................................................................................................... 55 3.2.3. Vegetation and Soils ................................................................................. 58 3.2.4. Water Quality............................................................................................ 63 3.2.5. Cultural Resources.................................................................................... 65 3.2.6. Visitor Experience..................................................................................... 66 3.2.7. Effects of Malfunctions or Accidents; Effects of Environment on Project; Effects of Changes to the Environment on Socio/Economic Conditions .. 68 3.3. SITE-SPECIFIC ANALYSIS FOR ALL ACTIVITIES.................................................. 70 3.3.1. Introduction............................................................................................... 70 3.3.2. Banff – Site-Specific Environmental Effects and Mitigation .................... 70 3.3.3. Jasper – Site-Specific Environmental Effects and Mitigation .................. 75 3.3.4. Kootenay – Site-Specific Environmental Effects and Mitigation.............. 78 3.3.5. Yoho – Site-Specific Environmental Effects and Mitigation..................... 79 3.3.6. Waterton – Site-Specific Environmental Effects and Mitigation .............. 81 3.3.7. Mount Revelstoke and Glacier – Site-Specific Environmental Effects and Mitigation.................................................................................................. 82 3.4. RESIDUAL EFFECTS AND SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................. 82 3.5. CUMULATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS.......................................................... 86 3.5.1. Integration of CEA, Class Screening and Business Licencing Review Process...................................................................................................... 87 3.5.2. Integration of CEA, Class Screening and Park Management Plan Review Process...................................................................................................... 91 3.6. SURVEILLANCE .................................................................................................. 95 3.7. FOLLOW-UP....................................................................................................... 95 4. CONSULTATION .................................................................................................. 96 4.1. PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROCESS ...................................................................... 96 4.1.1. Objectives of Consultations During MCSR Development ........................ 96 4.1.2. MCSR Development Consultation Approach............................................ 96 4.2. CEAA CONSULTATION...................................................................................... 97 4.3. FEDERAL COORDINATION REGULATIONS........................................................... 97 4.3.1. Federal Departments ................................................................................ 98 4.3.2. Provincial Departments............................................................................ 98 Model Class Screening Report September 2004 4.3.3. Other Expert Consultations ...................................................................... 98 4.4. CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REGISTRY...................................... 98 4.5. AMENDING THE MODEL CLASS SCREENING REPORT ......................................... 99 4.5.1. Amendment Procedures ............................................................................ 99 4.5.2. Term of Application ...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Conservation of Hardwoods and Associated Wildlife in the Cbfwcp Area in Southeastern British Columbia
    THE CONSERVATION OF HARDWOODS AND ASSOCIATED WILDLIFE IN THE COLUMBIA BASIN CBFWCP AREA IN SOUTHEASTERN FISH & WILDLIFE BRITISH COLUMBIA COMPENSATION PROGRAM PREPARED BY Bob Jamieson, Everett Peterson, Merle Peterson, and Ian Parfitt FOR Columbia Basin Fish & Wildlife Compensation Program May 2001 www.cbfishwildlife.org THE CONSERVATION OF HARDWOODS AND ASSOCIATED WILDLIFE IN THE CBFWCP AREA IN SOUTHEASTERN BRITISH COLUMBIA. Prepared for: THE COLUMBIA BASIN FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PROGRAM 333 Victoria St., Nelson, B.C. V1L 4K3 By: Bob Jamieson BioQuest International Consulting Ltd. Everett Peterson and Merle Peterson Western Ecological Services Ltd. Ian Parfitt GIS Coordinator, Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program Note on the organization of this report: The appendices to this report are included on an attached CD-ROM. Maps showing the distribution of hardwoods (1:250,000 scale) in each Forest District are included as ADOBE pdf files. The hardwood data, in ARCINFO format, are available at the CBFWCP office in Nelson. Age class and cover categories by Forest District, Landscape unit and species are provided in Excel spreadsheets. Citation: Jamieson, B., E.B. Peterson, N.M. Peterson and I. Parfitt. 2001. The conservation of hardwoods and associated wildlife in the CBFWCP area in southeastern British Columbia. Prepared for: Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Compensation Program, Nelson, B.C. By: BioQuest International Consulting Ltd., Western Ecological Services Ltd. and I. Parfitt. 98p. Contacts: Bob Jamieson BioQuest International Consulting Ltd. Box 73, Ta Ta Creek, B.C. VOB 2HO Phone: 250-422-3322 E-mail: [email protected] Everett and Merle Peterson Western Ecological Services Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009-2013 Jasper National Park Caribou Progress Report
    2009-2013 Jasper National Park Caribou Progress Report Lalenia Neufeld Mark Bradley Saakje Hazenberg With contributions from: John Wilmshurst Shelley Bird Colleen Arnison Amy Flasko Executive Summary Woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) range throughout North America has retracted northward and many populations across Canada are in decline. The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada has defined Canadian populations as Endangered (Atlantic- Gaspésie), Threatened (Southern Mountain and Boreal), Special Concern (Northern Mountain), and Not at Risk (Newfoundland) (Thomas and Gray 2002). Woodland caribou in Jasper National Park belong to the Threatened Southern Mountain Population. Phase I of the Jasper Woodland Caribou Recovery Action Plan was implemented in 2005. Its larger goals were to increase awareness of woodland caribou and recommend a suite of actions to mitigate factors contributing to caribou decline. Implementation of recovery actions began in the 2005-2006 fiscal year, shortly after the Plan was signed by Parks Canada. In 2007, as a follow-up to the Action Plan, the Mountain Parks Caribou Coordinating Committee initiated development of a Conservation Strategy for caribou in the mountain national parks. The strategy is intended to contribute towards meeting Parks Canada’s obligations under Canada's National Parks Act and the Species at Risk Act. Key direction for caribou recovery and sustainability, which is aligned with Parks Canada’s mandate of ecological integrity, public education, and visitor experience, is being formulated with the incorporation of the results from the public and Aboriginal consultations recently completed into the management plan. Required knowledge for informed management relies on the caribou monitoring program, the results of which are reported herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Robson Provincial Park, Draft Background Report
    Mount Robson Provincial Park Including Mount Terry Fox & Rearguard Falls Provincial Parks DRAFT BACKGROUND REPORT September, 2006 Ministry of Environment Ministry of Environment BC Parks Omineca Region This page left blank intentionally Acknowledgements This Draft Background Report for Mount Robson Provincial Park was prepared to support the 2006/07 Management Plan review. The report was prepared by consultant Juri Peepre for Gail Ross, Regional Planner, BC Parks, Omineca Region. Additional revisions and edits were performed by consultant Leaf Thunderstorm and Keith J. Baric, A/Regional Planner, Omineca Region. The report incorporates material from several previous studies and plans including the Mount Robson Ecosystem Management Plan, Berg Lake Corridor Plan, Forest Health Strategy for Mount Robson Provincial Park, Rare and the Endangered Plant Assessment of Mount Robson Provincial Park with Management Interpretations, the Robson Valley Land and Resource Management Plan, and the BC Parks website. Park use statistics were provided by Stuart Walsh, Rick Rockwell and Robin Draper. Cover Photo: Berg Lake and the Berg Glacier (BC Parks). Mount Robson Provincial Park, Including Mount Terry Fox & Rearguard Falls Provincial Parks: DRAFT Background Report 2006 Table of Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................1 Park Overview.................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The Paleoecological Record of 6 Ka BP Climate in the Canadian Prairie
    Document generated on 09/25/2021 5:12 a.m. Géographie physique et Quaternaire The Paleoecological Record of 6 ka BP Climate in the Canadian Prairie Provinces Données paléoécologiques sur le climat des provinces des Prairies à 6 ka BP Palaoökologische Belege über das Klima in den kanadischen Prärie-Provinzen um 6 ka v.u.Z. Robert E. Vance, Alwynne B. Beaudoin and Brian H. Luckman La paléogéographie et la paléoécologie d’il y a 6000 ans BP au Canada Article abstract Paleogeography and Paleoecology of 6000 yr BP in Canada Synthesis of available paleoecological studies in the Prairie provinces of Volume 49, Number 1, 1995 Canada indicates that although the peak in postglacial aridity that characterized early Holocene climate of the western foothills and plains had URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/033031ar passed, conditions remained warmer and drier than present throughout the DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/033031ar region ca. 6000 yr BP Compared to today, treeline elevations were higher and alpine glaciers were reduced in size in the Rocky Mountains, lake levels were lower over much of the Interior Plains, and the grassland and boreal forest See table of contents ecozones extended north of their present positions. Forest fires were more prevalent ca. 6000 yr BP than they are today, aiding westward migration of jack pine (Pinus banksiana) through the boreal forest and increasing the area Publisher(s) occupied by grassland in boreal and montane forest regions. Attempts to quantify the magnitude of 6 ka temperature and precipitation differences have Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal produced variable results, but suggest that mean annual temperature was 0.50°C to 1.50°C higher than today (summer temperature may have been up to ISSN 3°C higher) and mean annual precipitation was reduced by 65 mm (or summer 0705-7199 (print) precipitation was reduced by 50 mm), compared to present.
    [Show full text]
  • Helens Volcanic Eruptions Had Upon Prehistoric Populations in The
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Loren G. Davis for the degree of Master of Arts inInterdisciplinary Studies in Anthropology Geography and Soil Science, presented on May 18,1995. Title: Volcanism, Climate Change. and Prehistoric CulturalSuccession in Southern Washington and North-Central Idaho. Abstract approved: /; David R. Brauner The cultural influence of volcanic eruptions has beenemphasized in the archaeological literature. However, the largereffects that Mount St. Helens volcanic eruptions had upon prehistoricpopulations in the Pacific Northwest is not understood. This thesis asks questionsof the archaeological and paleoenvironmental record of the PacificNorthwest to assess the degree of influence Late Pleistocene and Holocene volcaniceruptions of Mount St. Helens had upon the cultural record of human existencein southern Washington and north-central Idaho. The record of eruptiveactivity at Mount St. Helens is reviewed and its tephra lobesmapped from reports of pyroclastic identification in the Pacific Northwest and westernCanada, to gain a temporal and spatial understanding of the eruptions.A general systemic model is presented to identify the factorsresponsible for the deposition, removal and alteration of tephra. Thismodel illustrates the complexity of tephrostratigraphic deposition, and increasesthe awareness of its residence within archaeological sites. Several setsof paleoenvironmental data are correlated with archaeological records ofhuman occupation in southern Washington and north-central Idaho,including records of pollen fluctuation,
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary Biomes of Canada and the Eastern United States John
    Late Quaternary biomes of Canada and the eastern United States John W. Williams1,3, Thompson Webb III1, Pierre H Richard2, and Paige Newby1 1 Department of Geological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA. 2 Géographie, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128 Centre-ville, Montréal, QC, Canada H3C 3J7. 3 National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, 735 State St., Suite 300, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, USA. Address for correspondence: National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, 735 State St., Suite 300, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, USA (fax: 1-805-892-2510, email: [email protected]) Ms for: Journal of Biogeography, BIOME 6000 special issue 1 March, 2000 Biome reconstructions for Canada and eastern US 2 (A) ABSTRACT 1 Pollen data have been used to construct biome maps for today, 6000 14C yr B.P., and 18,000 14C yr B.P. for Canada and the eastern United States 2 The inferred modern biome distributions agree well with independent reconstructions of North American vegetation prior to European settlement. Some discrepancies between the pollen data and the modern potential vegetation are caused by post-settlement clearing of the landscape and the consequent increase of herbaceous types in the recent pollen record. 3 Biome distributions at 6000 14C yr B.P. reflected the warmer and drier conditions then prevalent in the continental interior, but the overall position of biomes was similar to that today. Boreal treeline in North America was not significantly north of its present position, in contrast to the 100-300 km shift reported for Siberia. At the last glacial maximum (18,000 14C yr B.P.), steppe and tundra were prevalent in the Midwest and northwestern Canada, and coniferous forests and woodlands grew in eastern North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Icefield, Alberta
    RECONSTRUCTION OF THE GLACIAL HISTORY OF TBE COLUMBIA ICEFIELD, ALBERTA Bonnie Jean Robinson Department of Geography Subrnitted in parital fuifilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Facdty of Graduate Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Canada February 1998 0 B.J. Robinson 1998 National Library Biblioth6que nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliogiaphic Services seMces bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 305. rue Wellington ûüawa ON K1A ON4 Otmwa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distniute or sell reproduire, prêter, disûi%uer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/^ de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT Classically, glacier fluctuations have been used as phaty indicators of climate change. The histories of six glaciers at the Columbia Icefield (Castleguard, Columbia, Kitchener, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Stu~eld)were reconstructed using dendroglaciological techniques. Overridden trees document early Little Ice Age (LIA) advances after 127 1 at Stuffield and 1474 at Manitoba Glaciers.
    [Show full text]
  • Jasper National Park of Canada Management Plan
    Management Plan Jasper-NP_EN_final.pdf 22/04/2010 1:38:37 PM C M Y CM MY CY CMY K JASPER NATIONAL PARK OF CANADA MANAGEMENT PLAN © Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, represented by the Chief Executive Officer of Parks Canada, 2010 ISBN: 978-1-100-15731-3 Catalog No.: R61-36/2010E-PDF Jasper National Park of Canada Management Plan June 2010 Également offert en français JASPER NATIONAL PARK OF CANADA MANAGEMENT PLAN FOREWORD Canada’s national historic sites, national parks and national marine conservation areas offer Canadians from coast-to-coast-to-coast unique opportunities to experience and understand our wonderful country. They are places of learning, recreation and inspiration where Canadians can connect with our past and appreciate the natural, cultural and social forces that shaped Canada. From our smallest national park to our most visited national historic site to our largest national marine conservation area, each of these places offers Canadians and visitors superb experiential opportunities to enjoy Canada’s historic and natural heritage. These places of beauty, wonder and learning are valued by Canadians—they are part of our past, our present and our future. Our Government’s goal is to ensure that Canadians form a lasting connection to this heritage and that our protected places are enjoyed in ways that leave them unimpaired for present and future generations. We see a future in which these special places will further Canadians’ appreciation, understanding and enjoyment of Canada, the economic well- being of communities, and the vitality of our society. Our Government’s vision is to build a culture of heritage conservation in Canada by offering Canadians exceptional opportunities to experience our natural and cultural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY The Lake Minnewanka Site: Patterns in Late Pleistocene Use of the Alberta Rocky Mountains by Alison J. Landals A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY CALGARY, ALBERTA August 2008 © Alison J. Landals 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-44354-5 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-44354-5 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Park Report Jasper National Park Of
    STATE OF THE PARK REPORT JASPER NATIONAL PARK OF CANADA February 2005 Jasper National Park of Canada State of Park Report, February 2005 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 3 Ecological Integrity Condition and Trend......................................................................................... 3 Visitor Experience Condition and Trend ...........................................................................................................5 Public Education and Awareness Condition and Trend ....................................................................................5 Cultural Resource Management Condition and Trend......................................................................................5 An Assessment of the State of Ecological Integrity...................................................................... 10 Park-wide and Regional Ecosystem Indicators or Measures ..........................................................................10 Ecosystem-Specific Indicators..........................................................................................................................27 Montane Ecosystem Indicators ........................................................................................................................27 Subalpine ecosystem Indicators .......................................................................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • RPD SI Updated Pre-Subm Version PL
    The Reading Palaeofire database: an expanded global resource to document changes in fire regimes from sedimentary charcoal records: Supplementary Information Sandy P. Harrison1,2, Roberto Villegas-Diaz1, Esmeralda Cruz-Silva1, Daniel Gallagher2,3, David Kesner1,2, Paul LinColn1,2, Yicheng Shen1, Luke Sweeney1,2, Daniele Colombaroli2,3, Adam Ali4, Chéïma Barhoumi5, Yves Bergeron6,7, Tatiana BlyakharChuk8, Přemysl Bobek9, RiChard Bradshaw10, Jennifer L. Clear11, Sambor Czerwiński12, Anne-Laure Daniau13, John Dodson14,15, Kevin J. Edwards16,17, Mary E. Edwards18, AngeliCa Feurdean19, David Foster20, Konrad Gajewski21, Mariusz Gałka22, MiChelle Garneau23, Thomas GieseCke24, Graciela Gil Romera25,26, Martin P. Girardin27, Dana Hoefer28, Kangyou Huang29, Jun Inoue30, Eva JamriChová9, Nauris Jasiunas31, Wenying Jiang32, Gonzalo Jiménez-Moreno33, Monika Karpińska-Kołaczek12, Piotr Kołaczek12, Niina Kuosmanen34, Mariusz LamentowiCz35, Martin Lavoie36, Fang Li37, Jianyong Li38, Olga Lisitsyna39,40, José Antonio López-Sáez41, Reyes Luelmo- LautensChlaeger41, Gabriel Magnan23, Eniko Katalin Magyari42, Alekss Maksims43, Katarzyna MarCisz12, Elena Marinova44, Jenn Marlon45, SCott Mensing46, Joanna Miroslaw-Grabowska47, Wyatt Oswald20,48, Sebastián Pérez-Díaz49, Ramón Pérez-Obiol50, Sanna Piilo51, Anneli Poska39,52, Xiaoguang Qin53, Cécile C. Remy54, Pierre RiChard55, Sakari Salonen34, Naoko Sasaki56, Hieke SChneider57, William Shotyk58, Migle StanCikaite59, Dace Šteinberga43, Normunds Stivrins31,39,60, Hikaru Takahara61, Zhihai Tan62, Liva Trasune31,34,
    [Show full text]
  • (Abies Balsamea [L.] Mill.) Et De Ses Relations Avec Le Sapin Subalpin (Abies Lasiocarpa [Hook] Nutt.) Dans L’Ouest Du Canada
    Étude phylogéographique pancanadienne du sapin baumier (Abies balsamea [L.] Mill.) et de ses relations avec le sapin subalpin (Abies lasiocarpa [Hook] Nutt.) dans l’ouest du Canada Thèse Benjamin Cinget Doctorat en sciences forestières Philosophiæ Doctor (Ph. D.) Québec, Canada © Benjamin Cinget, 2015 Résumé La structure phylogéographique et l’histoire postglaciaire du sapin baumier (Abies balsamea), ont été étudiées en utilisant l’ADN mitochondrial (ADNmt) et l’ADN chloroplastique (ADNcp). La différenciation génétique entre populations est ainsi apparue importante pour l’ADNmt (dispersé par les graines) et pour l’ADNcp (dispersé par le pollen puis par les graines), impliquant donc un flux de gènes par le pollen plus restreint chez le sapin baumier que celui habituellement observé chez d’autres conifères boréaux. Cette faible dispersion du pollen est supposée due aux propriétés structurales et la faible production de pollen, mais aussi à la récurrence des épidémies de tordeuse du bourgeon de l’épinette limitant les efforts reproductifs du sapin baumier. Par ailleurs, les polymorphismes de l’ADNmt et de l’ADNcp sont apparus géographiquement structurés, mettant en évidence une concordance incomplète d’au moins cinq lignées chloroplastiques et cinq lignées mitochondriales, résultante des flux de gènes chloroplastiques en place depuis l’Holocène. Enfin, de nouvelles combinaisons de génomes cytoplasmiques ont été observées permettant la détection de plusieurs cas de capture de génome cytoplasmique. L’étude de l’étendue et de la direction de l’introgression cytoplasmique est utile pour comprendre la dynamique des zones hybrides entre espèces interfécondes. L’introgression cytoplasmique entre Abies lasiocarpa x Abies balsamea a été caractérisée en utilisant des marqueurs de l’ADNmt et de l’ADNcp.
    [Show full text]