DOCSLIB.ORG

FEA Newsletter March 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FEA Newsletter March 2007 MARCH 2 0 0 7 IN F O R M ATI O N WWW.FEAINFORMATION.COM LSTC Presentation a t 18th HP CAE Symposium IBM IBM SYSTEM X BLADECENTER SOLUTIONS Henry H. Fong FROM FEA TO MCAE TODAY A 40-YEAR PERSONAL ODYSSEY P a r t 1 FEA INFORMATION RESOURCE MAGAZINE FeaInformation.com 1 New Participant Introduction: Full Company Information will appear in the April Issue CARHS – “Since 1994 we have been working with the leading automobile manu- facturers worldwide. We know the engineering processes and tools in the industry in great detail. Our core business is offering state-of-the-art products and services in the field of Vehicle Safety: Simulation services for the internal and external safety of vehicles. Innovative engineering methods and tools. Extensive seminar programme and SafetyKnowledge.” For Complete Information visit: CARHS. Linux Networx – “Linux Supercomputing is our only business. That means we fo- cus exclusively on solving our customers' toughest supercomputing challenges. For nearly a decade Linux Networx has delivered supercomputing excellence. We blend the price performance advantage of Linux clusters with real-world super- computing expertise and innovation.” For Complete Information visit LNXI ARUP – INDIA - nHance Engineering Solutions Pvt Ltd was established in 2004 to provide software development resources to Oasys and to Arup divisions. Distribu- tors of the Oasys pre-and post-processing software, they will additionally distrib- ute LS-DYNA, LS-OPT and LS-PrePost Series: From FEA To MCAE Today – A 40-Year Personal Odyssey – Part 1 of 3 by Henry H. Fong, San Francisco, Caifornia. Sincerely, Art Shapiro [email protected] Marsha J. Victory [email protected] FeaInformation.com 2 Table Of Contents 01 Announcements 02 Table of Contents 03 Featured AVI – Courtesy of Gaurav Nilakantan 04 LS-DYNA Publication 06 LS-PrePost Update 08 LSTC Training Classes – April, May, June 09 TopCrunch Participant Listed Benchmarks 10 HP – LSTC presentation at 18th Annual HP CAE Symposium 11 HP– Experience LS-DYNA®by the hour… FREE! 12 Yahoo Yammerings 15 From FEA to MCAE Today by Henry H. Fong – Part 1 of 3 23 LS-DYNA and Other Worldwide Events 24 ARUP – Distributor of LS-DYNA in India 25 2nd ANSA & µETA International Congress 26 DYNAmore Training and Event Annoucements 27 IBM – HPC Solutions for CAE 29 MSC.Software Quick Product View – Part 1 31 ANSYS – News Release – ANSYS Icemax 33 Industry News Brief – AMD - NEC 34 Engineer’s Market Place 36+ Resource Pages FEA Information Inc. & News: FEA Information News: Editor Art Shapiro Technical Writers: Graphic Designer Dr. David Benson Wayne L. Mindle Dr. Ala Tabiei Business Manager Uli Franz Trent Eggleston Suri Bala President Marsha J. Victory Writing Consultants: Steve Pilz – Reza Sadeghi FeaInformation.com 3 LS-DYNA Featured AVI Complete AVI’s can be viewed at: www.feainformation.com – top bar link “AVI Lib” AVI 204 Side collision - light weight truck Courtesy Gaurav Nilakantan - Univ. Delaware AVI 204a Oblique crash - light weight truck – guardrail Courtesy Gaurav Nilakantan - Univ. Delaware FeaInformation.com 4 LS-DYNA Publication Abstract/Introduction Updated information may be available. Contact the paper author. Chosen from the 9th International LS-DYNA Users Conference 2006 The Complete Paper: on FEA Publications Side Bar Link: “Featured” A High Strain Rate Model with Failure for Ice In LS-DYNA Kelly S. Carney – NASA Glenn Research Center – USA David J. Benson – Univ. of California, Sand Diego – USA Paul Du Bois – Germany Ryan Lee – The Boeing Company – USA Abstract rately model the structural response of Modeling the high velocity impact of ice the vehicle, and an accurate model for was a requirement in the safety calcula- ice. Low cost PC clusters have provided tions for the return-to-flight of the Space the required computer power. Finite Shuttle on July 26, 2005. Ice, however, element methods have advanced dra- is not a common structural material and matically since DeWolfe's investigation. commercial finite element programs did- There has been, however, little effort n't have any appropriate models. A phe- previously in the development of a con- nomenological model with failure was stitutive model for ice that can be used developed to match experimental ballis- in finite element calculations. tic tests. The model has a relatively small number of material constants, The Columbia Space Shuttle tragedy mo- most of which have been measured ex- tivated a large scale safety review of the perimentally. A description of the model Space Shuttle, and included in that re- and comparisons of calculations to ex- view was a requirement for certifying the periments are presented. ability of the leading edge of the wing to safely sustain impacts of various types of debris [2]. The leading edge is made of Introduction carbon-carbon composites, with each The destructive effects of the impact of section costing over one million dollars. ice at high speeds is well known. For Given the wide range of debris, impact man-rated vehicles, experiments are locations, and velocities, and the many usually required to certify the safety of months it takes to produce a single the design. Jet engines, for example, are panel, a complete experimental test pro- required to pass ice ingestion tests by gram would be prohibitively expensive the FAA. Concern about the impact of ice and could not be accomplished in a on the Space Shuttle dates back to at timely manner. Finite element analysis, least to the 1983 test program described carefully validated by a series of experi- by DeWolfe [1]. ments, was therefore required to certify the Space Shuttle for flight. Analyses were rarely carried out previ- ously for many reasons, including the After calculating the relative velocity of absence of sufficient computer power, the leading edge and debris, analyses software that could handle both the ex- were limited to low density materials treme deformations of the ice and accu- that would rapidly decelerate in the at- FeaInformation.com 5 mosphere. Dense objects, such as bolts, space industry, is rarely subject to high are not believed to endanger the leading strain rate impact conditions. Although edge since the relative impact velocity ice has been studied extensively, e.g., would be low. Low density materials, [3], only a very few efforts have been such as the foam that brought down Co- made to model it numerically at high lumbia, rapidly decelerate to the point strain rates [4,5]. Attempts to use exist- that the Shuttle flies into the debris at a ing models, including some intended for velocity up to 3000 ft./s. Ice decelerates brittle engineering materials, demon- rapidly enough to be considered a poten- strated the need for an improved model. tial problem, with a maximum expected impact velocity of up to 1000 ft./s. The ice model presented here was devel- oped under the deadlines required to re- Constitutive models for reinforced car- turn the Space Shuttle to flight. It is bon-carbon composites and the low den- phenomenological in nature, and its sity foams covering the external fuel value was judged based on how well it tank are reasonably mature, and valida- modeled the ballistic experiments. As far tion experiments using the shuttle mate- as possible, the material parameters rials demonstrated their accuracy. Ice, have been measured by experiments however, is not a commercial structural that are independent of the experiments material, and aside from high velocity used to validate the accuracy of the ice impact situations of interest to the aero- model. FeaInformation.com 6 LS-PrePost® Online Documentation Update www.lstc.com/lspp Copyright © 2007 LSTC FeaInformation.com 7 LS-PrePost® Continued 10-Mar - Added Record Orient option to Toggle Menu to suppress writing of orienta- tion commands to Command File 28-Feb - Tutorial 16 added to online documentation (Intro to Block Mesher) 24-Feb - Update of SphGen Interface LS-PrePost® was designed to provide the following core functionalities: Full LS-DYNA® keyword support LS-DYNA model visualization LS-DYNA model creation and editing Advanced post-processing LS-PrePost's main post-processing capabilities include states result animation, fringe component plotting, and XY history plotting. LS-PrePost is also capable of importing and exporting data in a number of common formats. The figure on the right illustrates a sampling of those that a typical user might find most useful. FeaInformation.com 8 LSTC California & Michigan Training Classes April – May – June A complete list of dates can be found on the LSTC website April 10-13 CA LS-OPT May 01-04 CA Introduction to LS-DYNA June 05-08 MI Introduction to LS-DYNA 12-13 CA Contact 14-15 CA Composite Materials 18-19 CA Material Modeling Using User Defined Options 26-29 CA Advanced – Impact Analysis For Class Details: www.lstc.com FeaInformation.com 9 Participant Benchmarks On TopCrunch. TopCrunch.org For Complete Vendor Submitted Benchmarks Vendor Submitted – QLogic Feb. 15 – March 09, 2007 Cambridge Cluster/ Intel Dualcore Xeon 5160 3.0 32 x 2 x 2 208 neon_refined_revised QLogic InfiniPath IB GHz = 128 Cambridge Cluster/ Intel Dualcore Xeon 5160 3.0 32 x 2 x 1 223 neon_refined_revised QLogic InfiniPath IB GHz = 64 Cambridge Cluster/ Intel Dualcore Xeon 5160 3.0 16 x 2 x 2 293 neon_refined_revised QLogic InfiniPath IB GHz = 64 Cambridge Cluster/ Intel Dualcore Xeon 5160 3.0 16 x 2 x 1 388 neon_refined_revised QLogic InfiniPath IB GHz = 32 Cambridge Cluster/ Intel Dualcore Xeon 5160 3.0 8 x 2 x 2 = 482 neon_refined_revised
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fatal Gun Accident Tuesday Claims Life of 18-Year-Old
    1 WEATHER QUOTE , ' Max: Min. Preclp. Thursday, June 26. .88 04 0.00 Friday, June 27.......63 08 0.00 "We find, scarcely any Saturday,June28 ..77 69 0.00 Sunday, June 29 .... 86 57 0.00 persons of good sense save Monday, June 30... 69 53 0.00 those who agree with us." Tuesday, July 1.......73 54 0.00 —La Rochefoucauld. Wednesday, July 2.. 80 57 0.00 kONE HUNDRED-ELEVENTH YEAR No. 4 16 Pages This Week CHELSEA, MICHIGAN, THURSDAY, JULY 3, 1980 USPS 101-720 25C per copy SUBSCRIPTION: $8.00 PER YEAR Fatal Gun Accident Tuesday Claims Life of 18-Year-Old A tragic accident with a gun enter the chamber the first time the First Congregational Church that was supposed to be unloaded Koch pulled the bolt, but then of Chelsea and was employed at claimed the life of an 18-year-old chambered when he racked the the Fox Village Theater at Maple Chelsea man Monday afternoon. gun twice more. Village. Todd Wright, ld 1980 Chelsea Wright was taken by am­ Surviving are his father, Robin High school graduate, died at bulance to Chelsea Hospital Wright of Saline; his mother and University of Michigan Hospital emergency room, where his con­ step-father, Nell (Wireman) and Monday, brief hours after being dition was stabilized. He was then J. Glenn Culler of Dexter; pater­ accidentally shot through the transferred to University nal grandmother, Elnora Wright heart with a .22 calibre rifle. Hospital in Ann Arbor, where he of Chelsea; paternal grandfather died shortly after arrival.
    [Show full text]
  • HHE Report No. HETA-90-0368-2137, Rockwell
    ThisThis Heal Healthth Ha Hazzardard E Evvaluaaluationtion ( H(HHHEE) )report report and and any any r ereccoommmmendendaatitonsions m madeade herein herein are are f orfor t hethe s sppeeccifiicfic f afacciliilityty e evvaluaaluatedted and and may may not not b bee un univeriverssaalllyly appappliliccabable.le. A Anyny re reccoommmmendaendatitoionnss m madeade are are n noot tt oto be be c consonsideredidered as as f ifnalinal s statatetemmeenntsts of of N NIOIOSSHH po polilcicyy or or of of any any agen agenccyy or or i ndindivivididuualal i nvoinvolvlved.ed. AdditionalAdditional HHE HHE repor reportsts are are ava availilabablele at at h htttptp:/://ww/wwww.c.cddcc.gov.gov/n/nioiosshh/hhe/hhe/repor/reportsts ThisThis HealHealtthh HaHazzardard EEvvaluaaluattionion ((HHHHEE)) reportreport andand anyany rreeccoommmmendendaattiionsons mmadeade hereinherein areare fforor tthehe ssppeecciifficic ffaacciliilittyy eevvaluaaluatteded andand maymay notnot bbee ununiiververssaallllyy appappapplililicccababablle.e.le. A AAnynyny re rerecccooommmmmmendaendaendattitiooionnnsss m mmadeadeade are areare n nnooott t t totoo be bebe c cconsonsonsiideredderedidered as asas f fifinalnalinal s ssttataatteteemmmeeennnttstss of ofof N NNIIOIOOSSSHHH po popolliilccicyyy or oror of ofof any anyany agen agenagencccyyy or oror i indndindiivviviiddiduuualalal i invonvoinvollvvlved.ed.ed. AdditionalAdditional HHEHHE reporreporttss areare avaavaililabablele atat hhtttpp::///wwwwww..ccddcc..govgov//nnioiosshh//hhehhe//reporreporttss This Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) report and any recommendations made herein are for the specific facility evaluated and may not be universally applicable. Any recommendations made are not to be considered as final statements of NIOSH policy or of any agency or individual involved. Additional HHE reports are available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/reports HETA 90-368-2137 NIOSH INVESTIGATOR: September 1991 John A.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockwell Automation, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ____________ Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 Commission file number 1-12383 Rockwell Automation, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 25-1797617 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 1201 South 2 nd Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: +1 (414) 382-2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act : Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $1 Par Value New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☑ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Fix » Some Companies Don’T Wait for Lightning to Strike
    Fuel Fix » Some companies don’t wait for lightning to strike Home EnergyWatch Washington Loren Steffy Voices Jobs chron.com Some companies don’t wait for lightning to strike CATEGORIES Posted on by in , , March 18, 2013 at 6:57 am Jeannie Kever Natural Gas Oil Oil field services Select Category Comments(0) | E-mail | Print Tweet 3 Like Like 9 0 Back in Ben Franklin’s day, no one worried about lightning causing a chemical tank to explode or shutting down the electronic controls to a nuclear reactor. Technology has raised the stakes since Franklin invented the lightning rod – lightning-sparked fires caused more than $1 billion in insured homeowners’ losses in 2010 alone, according to the Insurance Information Institute. The costs can be even higher for the oil and gas industry; a 2006 study published in the Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries found lightning strikes are the most common cause of accidents involving storage tanks at refineries and petrochemical plants. Lightning storm over Albuquerque, N.M. (Roch Hart/Barcroft Media) RECENT POSTS “For the guys who’ve been around for 30 or 40 years, it’s not Judge sets hearing for ‘fictitious claims’ in Gulf oil spill if, it’s when they’re going to get hit,” said Matt Jones, project Markets steady but remain wary manager for Ashley Automation & Technology, an industrial electrical firm that works mostly in the oil fields. And while Hacked PCs falsify billions of ad clicks lightning is hardly the only risk for oil and gas production and other facilities, it’s a big one, said David Miller, director of Persian Gulf oil power takes a shine to solar Obama faces battle to woo Israeli public standards for the American Petroleum Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Matching Gift Programs * Please Note, This List Is Not All Inclusive
    Companies With Matching Gift Programs * Please note, this list is not all inclusive. If your employer is not listed, please check with human resources to see if your company matches and the guidelines for matches. A AlliedSignal Inc. Archer Daniels Midland 3Com Corporation Allstate Foundation, Allstate Giving ARCO Chemical Co. 3M Company Altera Corp. Contributions Program Ares Advanced Technology AAA Altria Employee Involvement Ares Management LLC Abacus Capital Investments Altria Group Argonaut Group Inc. Abbot Laboratories AMB Group Aristokraft Inc. Accenture Foundation, Inc. Ambac Arkansas Best Corporation Access Group, Inc. AMD Corporate Giving Arkwright Mutual Insurance Co. ACE INA Foundation American Express Co. Armco Inc. Acsiom Corp. American Express Foundation Armstrong Foundation Adams Harkness and Hill Inc. American Fidelity Corp. Arrow Electronics Adaptec Foundation American General Corp. Arthur J. Gallagher ADC Foundation American Honda Motor Co. Inc. Ashland Oil Foundation, Inc. ADC Telecommunications American Inter Group Aspect Global Giving Program Adobe Systems Inc. American International Group, Inc. Aspect Telecommunications Associates ADP Foundation American National Bank and Trust Co. Corp. of North America A & E Television Networks of Chicago Assurant Health AEGON TRANSAMERICA American Standard Foundation Astra Merck Inc. AEP American Stock Exchange AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical LP AES Corporation Ameriprise Financial Atapco A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co. Ameritech Corp. ATK Foundation Aetna Foundation, Inc. Amgen Center Atlantic Data Services Inc. AG Communications Systems Amgen Foundation Atochem North America Foundation Agilent Technologies Amgen Inc. ATOFINA Chemicals, Inc. Aid Association for Lutherans AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. ATO FINA Pharmaceutical Foundation AIG Matching Grants Program Corporate Giving Program AT&T Aileen S. Andrew Foundation AmSouth BanCorp.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Matching Funds
    Increase the size of your gift with a Matching Gift! 1. What is a Matching Gift Program? 2. How does a Matching Gift Program Work? 3. Does it work? 4. List of companies that have Matching Gift Programs? 1. What is a Matching Gift Program? Many companies allow their employees to direct their charitable giving programs through matching gifts. When an employee notifies the company that he/she has made a charitable donation, the company will make a gift of the same amount, and in some cases double the amount, to the same charitable organization. Matching Gift Programs are a wonderful way for employees to make their charitable dollars stretch farther at no cost to themselves. Simply ask your company's human resources office for a matching gift form and we will do the rest! Below is a partial list of companies with matching gift programs. Even if you do not find your employer on this list, be sure to check with your human resources office, personnel department, or community relations office. 2. How does a Matching Gift Program Work? It is extremely easy to process. Gift matching procedures can vary from company to company. The following example is typical. 1. An employee/retiree gets a matching gift form from the employer, usually from the human resource department or company website. 2. After completing the form, the employee/retiree sends it along with the donation to the educational institution or nonprofit charity. 3. The nonprofit certifies on the form that it has received the gift and meets the company’s guidelines for receiving a matching gift.
    [Show full text]
  • Employee Matching Gift Programs
    EMPLOYEE MATCHING GIFT PROGRAMS The following companies are among those ofering gift matching programs to employees. To request a matching gift, just fill out the form on your corporate web site or request a form from your HR department, and send the completed form together with your contribution to: GRREAT PO Box 3069 Falls Church, VA 22043-0069 We’ll complete the form and provide any documentation needed to secure the matching contribution. And if your employer isn’t listed below, please contact your HR department – we may have simply failed to include your company. If that’s the case, please call the GRREAT phone line (703-620-6593) or email us ([email protected], with “matching gift” in the subject line), and we’ll update our list to include your employer. And our sincere thanks for supporting GRREAT! Abbott Laboratories Fund American Honda A Accenture American International Group, Inc. Acuson Adaptec, Inc. Ameritech Addison Wesley Longman Amgen Adobe Systems, Inc. Analog Devices, Inc. Advanced Fibre Communications Anchor Brewing Company Advanced Micro Devices Anheuser-Busch Foundation AES Corporation Aon Foundation Aetna Foundation Archer Daniels Midland Air Products & Chemicals Inc. ARCO Foundation Albetson's Inc. Aramark Corp Alcoa Foundation Argonaut Group, Inc. Alex Brown & Sons, Inc. Arkwright Foundation, Inc. Alexander & Baldwin Foundation Arthur J. Gallagher Foundation Allegheny Technologies Aspect Telecommunications Allendale Mutual Insurance Company AT&T Foundation Alliance Bank ATV Capital Management, Inc. Alliance Capital Management, LP Autodesk, Inc. Allstate Foundation Automatic Data Processing, Inc. Alliant Techsystems Avery Deninison Corp ALZA Corporation Avon American Express Foundation Axa Foundation Bakar, Gerson Foundation Best Foods B Bank of America Foundation Bethlehem Steel Corporation Bank of California, NA Black & Decker Matching Gifts Bankers Trust Foundation Blauvelt Demarest Foundation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies with Matching Gift Programs
    Companies with Matching Gift Programs Many companies encourage charitable giving by matching gifts made by their employees. As a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, CHCA is eligible for matching gifts. Below is a list of companies that have matching gift programs. Even if a company is not listed, they may still have a matching gift program. In addition, not all companies match PK-12 schools. To find out if your company matches gifts made to CHCA, please contact your HR representative. If you need additional assistance, please e-mail Paige Tomlin at [email protected]. A AK Steel 3Com Corporation Albemarle Corp. 3M Company Alco Standard AlliedSignal Inc. Alexander and Baldwin Inc. Allstate Alexander Hamilton Life Abacus Capital Investments Alexander Haas Martin and Partners Abbott Laboratories Al Neyer Altera Corp. Contributions Allegro Microsystems Inc. Accenture Alliance Bernstein Access Fund Alliance Capital Management L.P. ACE INA Foundation Alliance Coal LLC Adams Harkness and Hill Inc. Alliant Techsystems Altria Group Allegiance Corp. and Baxter International Adaptec Foundation Allendale Insurance Foundation AMBAC Indemnity American Natl Bank & Trust ADC Telecommunications American Intl Group, Inc. AMD Corporate Giving American Standard Found Adobe Systems Inc. Amgen Inc. ADP Foundation AMN Healthcare Services American Express Co. AmSouth BanCorp. A & E Television Networks American Stock Exchange AEGON TRANSAMERICA Ameriprise Financial AEP Ameritech Corp. AES Corporation AMETEK / Sealtron A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co. AMSTED Industries Inc. American Fidelity Corp. Amylin Pharmaceuticals Aetna Foundation, Inc. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. American General Corp. Analytics Operations Engineering AG Communications Systems Analog Devices Inc. American Honda Motor Co. Avon Products Foundation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 19830004182.Pdf
    " uJ LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER 3 1176 00506 2394 NASA Conference Publication 2249 Tenth • , NASTRAN Users" Colloquium Proceedings of a colloquium held at New Orleans, Louisiana May 13-14, 1982 tUlSA NASA Conference Publication 2249 Tenth NASTRAN Users' Colloquium Proceedings of a colloquium held at New Orleans, Louisiana May 13-14, 1982 N_A National Aeronautics and Space Administration ScientificandTechnical InformationBranch 1982 FOREWORD NASTRAN® (NASA STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS) is a large, comprehensive, nonproprietary, general purpose finite element computer code for structural analysis which was developed under NASA sponsorship and became available to the public in late 1970. It can be obtained through COSMIC (Computer Software Management and Information Center), Athens, Georgia, and is widely used by NASA, other government agencies, and industry. NASA currently provides continuing maintenance of NASTRAN® through COSMIC. Because of the widespread interest in NASTRAN®, and finite element methods in general, the Tenth NASTRAN@ Users' Colloquium was organized and held at the Marriott Hotel, New Orleans, May 13-14, 1982. (Papers from previous colloquia held in 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1979, and 1980, are published in NASA Technical Memorandums X-2378, X-2637, X-2378, X-2893, X-3278, X-3428, and NASA Conference Publications 2018, 2062, 2131, and 2151.) The Tenth Colloquium provides some comprehensive general papers on the application of finite element methods in engineering, comparisons with other approaches, unique applications, pre- and post-processing or auxiliary programs, and new methods of analysis with NASTRAN®. Individuals actively engaged in the use of finite elements or NASTRAN® were invited to prepare papers for presentation at the Colloquium.
    [Show full text]
  • Coe College Board of Trustees Profiles
    COE COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES PROFILES J. DAVID CARSON – CHAIR (2000-2019) Dave Carson is originally from Chicago and presently lives in Northville, Michigan (west suburb of Detroit). Dave was a member of the senior global finance executive team at Ford Motor Company when he retired in January 2007; during his 33–year career he was based both in Detroit and in Europe. Since retiring, he has been an advisor to several companies. Dave graduated from Coe in 1972, majoring in economics and business administration, and earned an MBA from the University of Iowa. Prior to joining Ford, he taught at Coe for two years. He has been a member of the Coe Board of Trustees since 2000. He and his wife, Mary (Bridenstine) Carson ’73, have an adult son and daughter. Dave loves golf, reading and traveling. KEN GOLDER – VICE CHAIR (2007-2019) Ken Golder, originally from Winnetka, Illinois, is a “semi-retired” Real Estate Investor and Hotelier. He graduated from Coe in 1982 with an interdisciplinary bachelor’s degree in communication techniques. Ken has almost 30 years of experience in the hotel industry and has held various positions with Americana, Registry, Holiday Inn Corporation and Promus Hotels (Embassy Suites). He is a Certified Hospitality Marketing Executive (CHME), past Board Member of the St. Paul Convention & Visitors Authority, and former President of the Minnesota Hospitality Sales & Marketing Association. Since 2000, Ken has acquired and manages a variety of hotel properties including: Holiday Inn – St. Paul Downtown; Holiday Inn Express – Deerfield, Illinois; and Staybridge Suites Airport – Columbus, Ohio. He and his wife, Sue (Roe) Golder ’82, have lived in Apple Valley, Minnesota since 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • RS-00019, "Radiation Survey of the Downey Facility", May 7, 2001
    Engineering Product Document ;O Number StA Number Page 1 of Total Pages Rev. LtrIChg. No. Number See Summary of Chg. 10054 13333 103 I 03 NEW RS-00019 Yogram Title ladiation Safety Iocument Title ladiation Survey of the Downey Facility Iocument Type Related Documents hgineering Product Document kiginal Issue Date Approvals Date /1 101 P. Rutherford Irepared ByIDate D&C' MailtAddr I, Liddy 08- 5/&641 TO38 S. Reeder /- 641 TO38 3&D Program? Yes II] No N Yes, Enter Authorization No. , Distribution Abstract Name This document describes a radiation survey of a portion of the Downey J. Barnes Facility. This survey is designed to verify that the Downey Facility has no1 been impacted by radiological operations associated with the Water Boile P. Rutherford ~eutron'source(WBNS) reactor. Measurements taken demonstrated M. Lee that clean-up standards promulgated by the Department of Energy, P. Liddy Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and Department of Heafth Services R. McGinnis were met, and that there was no indication of any residual contamination 8. Copeland in the facility. Accordingly, the area is suitable for release for unrestricted use. IP.Yeh Rad Safety Files (5) Engineering Data Mgmt Facility Release Files Reserved for ProprietaryILegal Notice No Asterisk, Title PageISummary or Change Page Only. ocketdyne Form 651-F RN.2-97 RS-0001 9 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Surnrnafy............................................................................................................. 4 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Matching Gift Companies *Verify with Your HR Dept. 3M a a & B Foundation a K Steel Foundation A
    List of Matching Gift Companies *Verify with your HR Dept. 3M A A & B Foundation A K Steel Foundation A. E. Stanley Manufacturing A. O. Smith Foundation AARP Abbott Laboratories ABN AMRO Accenture Access Energy Corp. ACE INA Acuity Brands Acuson Corporation A-D Electronics, Inc. Adams, Harkness & Hill, Inc. Adaptec Foundation ADC Telecommunications Adelante Capital Management, LLC Adobe Systems Inc. ADP Advance Micro Devices Advancement Programs AES Corporation Aetna Inc. AG Communication Systems Corp. AIG Matching Grants Program Air Products and Chemicals Akzo Nobel Chemicals, Inc. Albany International Corp. Albermarble Corp. Albright & Wilson Americas, Inc. Alcan Aluminum Corporation Alco Standard Corp. Alcoa Foundation Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. Alexander Haas Martin Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. Allegheny Teledyne Allegro MicroSystems Inc. Allendale Mutual Insurance Co. Alliance Capital Management, LP Alliant Techsystems Allied-Signal, Inc. Allstate Corporation Altria Group Inc. Amazon Amerada Hess Corporation American Airlines American Brands, Inc. American Broadcast Co. American Express Co. American General Corporation American Home Products Corporation American International Group Inc. American International Group, Inc. American National Bank American National Can Co. American Security Insurance Group American Standard, Inc. American Stock Exchange American Stock Exchange, Inc. Amerigroup Corporation Ameriprise Financial Ameristar Casinos Ameritech Amfac, Inc. Amgen, Inc. Amica Insurance Amoco Foundation Inc. AMP Fdn. AmSouth BanCorp. Foundation AMSTED Industries, Inc. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. Analog Devices Anchor Capital Advisors Inc. Anchor/Russell Capital Advisors Inc. Andersen Consulting Andersons Inc. Anheuser- Busch Anthem, Inc AOL Time Warner Aon Corp. Aquarion Co. Archer Daniels Midland ARCO ARCO Foundation Arco Foundation, Inc. Ares Advanced Technology Argonaut Croup Inc. Ariel Capital Management, LLC Aristech Chemical Company Aristokraft Inc.
    [Show full text]