DOCSLIB.ORG

19830004182.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
19830004182.Pdf " uJ LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER 3 1176 00506 2394 NASA Conference Publication 2249 Tenth • , NASTRAN Users" Colloquium Proceedings of a colloquium held at New Orleans, Louisiana May 13-14, 1982 tUlSA NASA Conference Publication 2249 Tenth NASTRAN Users' Colloquium Proceedings of a colloquium held at New Orleans, Louisiana May 13-14, 1982 N_A National Aeronautics and Space Administration ScientificandTechnical InformationBranch 1982 FOREWORD NASTRAN® (NASA STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS) is a large, comprehensive, nonproprietary, general purpose finite element computer code for structural analysis which was developed under NASA sponsorship and became available to the public in late 1970. It can be obtained through COSMIC (Computer Software Management and Information Center), Athens, Georgia, and is widely used by NASA, other government agencies, and industry. NASA currently provides continuing maintenance of NASTRAN® through COSMIC. Because of the widespread interest in NASTRAN®, and finite element methods in general, the Tenth NASTRAN@ Users' Colloquium was organized and held at the Marriott Hotel, New Orleans, May 13-14, 1982. (Papers from previous colloquia held in 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1978, 1979, and 1980, are published in NASA Technical Memorandums X-2378, X-2637, X-2378, X-2893, X-3278, X-3428, and NASA Conference Publications 2018, 2062, 2131, and 2151.) The Tenth Colloquium provides some comprehensive general papers on the application of finite element methods in engineering, comparisons with other approaches, unique applications, pre- and post-processing or auxiliary programs, and new methods of analysis with NASTRAN®. Individuals actively engaged in the use of finite elements or NASTRAN® were invited to prepare papers for presentation at the Colloquium. These papers are included in this volume. No editorial review was provided by NASA or COSMIC, however, detailed instructions were provided each author to achieve reasonably consistent paper format and content. The opinions and data presented are the sole responsibility of the authors and their respective organizations. iii CONTENTS Page FOREWORD ................................. iii i. OPERATING IN THE AGE OF NASTRAN ................... 1 by Thomas G. Butler (Butler Analyses) 2. RECENT IMPROVEMENTS AND ENHANCEMENTS TO NASTRAN ........... 12 by P. R. Pamidi (Computer Sciences Corporation) 3. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF NASTRAN PRE- AND POST-PROCESSORS: RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS (RESPAN) AND INTERACTIVE GRAPHICS (GIFTS) ..... 18 by Eric F. Hirt and Gary L. Fox (NKF Engineering Associates, Inc.) 4. AN INTERACTIVE REVIEW SYSTEM FOR NASTRAN .............. 45 by Lawrence L. Durocher (University of Bridgeport) and Andrew F. Gasper (Hamilton Standard) 5. ON THE USE OF HARMONIC EXPANSIONS IN MAGNETIC FIELD PROBLEMS IN NASTRAN ............................... 65 by Myles M. Hurwitz, Delores R. Wallace, and Ernest W. Brooks (David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center) 6. IMPROVING A NASTRAN DYNAMIC MODEL WITH TEST DATA USING LINWOOD . 74 by B. H. Ujihara, M. M. Dosoky, and E. T. Tong (Rockwell International) 7. SOLUTION OF AXISYMMETRIC FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION PROBLEMS _ WITH NASTRAN ............................. 87 by A. J. Kalinowski and C. W. Nebelung (Naval Underwater Systems Center) 8. LARGE DISPLACEMENTS AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF NONLINEAR PROPELLER STRUCTURES ............................. 112 by Robert A. Aiello and Christos C. Chamis (NASA Lewis Research Center) 9. PREDICTION OF BEAD AREA CONTACT LOAD AT THE TIRE-WHEEL INTERFACE USING NASTRAN ........................... 133 By C. H. S. Chen (The B.F. Goodrich Company) i0. ON ELASTIC-PLASTIC ANALYSIS OF AN OVERLOADED BREECH RING USING NASTRAN ............................... 143 by P. C. T. Chen (U. S. Army Armament Research and Development Command Benet Weapons Laboratory) ii. FINITE ELEMENT SOLUTION OF TORSION AND OTHER 2-D POISSON EQUATIONS . 153 by Gordon C. Everstine (David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center) 12. A NEW CAPABILITY FOR ELASTIC AIRCRAFT AIRLOADS VIA NASTRAN ..... 165 by Hugh C. Briggs and Lance E. Chrisinger (Air Force Institute of Technology) 13. NASTRAN ON THE HEP ......................... 187 by W. Keith Brown (RPK Corporation) 14. THE USAGE OF SUBSTRUCTURING ANALYSES IN THE GET AWAY SPECIAL (GAS) PROGRAM .............................. 204 by Nelson J. Ferragut (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center) 15. USING NASTRAN TO SOLVE SYMMETRIC STRUCTURES WITH NONSYMMETRIC LOADS . 216 by Thomas G. Butler (Butler Analyses) 16. EVALUATION AND REDUCTION OF ERRORS INDUCED BY THE GUYAN TRANSFORMATION ........................... 233 by Gary L. Fox (NKF Engineering Associates, Inc.) 17. ON RESTARTS IN NASTRAN ....................... 249 by P. R. Pamidi and M. M. Lin (Compute r Sciences Corporation) OPERATING IN THE AGE OF NASTRAN T. G. Butler, BUTLER ANALYSES NASTRAN was born at a time when technology was advancing rapidly. It is interesting to reflect on conditions prevailing then. At year zero in the age of NASTRAN (1964) the role of analysis in mechanical design was to make rough estimates. Testing was relied on for proof of design. Analysts were known as intellectual eggheads, but test people were called practical, down-to-earth types. Popular analytical methods at the time were Hardy-Cross and Hrenikoff for statics; for shaft vibrations they were Mykelstad and Holzer. Analog computers were the most advanced analytical tools. Electrical engineers were doing remarkable things with network analyzers, and similar success was enjoyed with hydraulic networks. Finite elements had only recently appeared, and all programs were company-proprietary and limited in solution range. Aerospace companies dominated the finite element scene. The workhorse computer was the IBM 7094, but third-generation computers were developing a competi- tion between IBM 360, CDC 6600, and UNIVAC ll08. Time sharing was on the drawing boards. Terminal inputs used card readers. Universities were preoccupied with solving boundary value problems, but a small nucleus of about 20 professors worldwide were taking finite elements seriously. NASA's Office of Advanced Research and Technology (OART) under Dr. Raymond Bisplinghoff sponsored a considerable amount of research in the area of flight structures through its operating centers. Representatives from the centers who managed research in structures convened annually to exchange ideas. I was one of the representatives from Goddard Space Flight Center at the meeting in January 1964. I detected a pattern that seemed to need redirection. Center after center described research programs to improve analysis of structures. Shells of different kinds were logical for NASA to analyze at the time because rockets are shell- i like. Each research concentrated on a different aspect of shells. Some were closed with discontinuous boundaries. Other shells had cutouts. Others were noncircular. Others were partial spans of less than 360°• This all seemed quite worthwhile if the products of the research resulted in exact closed-form solutions. However, all of them were geared toward making some simplifying assumption that made it possible to write a computer program to give numerical solutions for their behavior. The popular phrase at the time was "solutions to within engineering accuracy." Each of these computer programs required data organization different from every other program; e.g., they were not oompatible. Each was intended for exploring localized conditions rather than complete shell-like structures, such as a whole rocket. My reaction to these programs was that if the end products were all accurate only to within engineering accuracy, technology was currently available to give engineering solu- tions to not just localized shells but to whole, highly varied structures. The method was finite elements. I proposed that finite elements be used for obtaining engineering solutions and research be upgraded to making fewer simplifications and aim for closed-form solutions, which are always needed. This caused a furor, but Headquarters responded by setting up a committee to investigate the subject of numerical analysis of structures. The ad hoc committee was composed of a representative from each NASA Center. There was some change of personnel before the committee's work was completed. Names of members were: Center Representative Ames Dick Beam and Perry Polentz Flight Dick Rosecrans Goddard Tom Butler (Chairman) and Pete Smidinger JPL Mickey Alper and Bob Bamford Langley Herb Cunningham Lewis Bill Scott and Jim McAleese Manned Tom Modlin Marshall Bob McComas The committee was commissioned to investigate what the state of analysis was in the aerospace industry at the time. We were to determine if analog computing should be promoted more or if the finite elements method was more suited to NASA's analyses. We were to try to find an existing finite element program of a quality that would be worth recommending to all NASA Centers. We wanted to visit all aerospace companies, but under out-time and budgetary constraints we were obliged to limit ourselves. We visited Boeing in Seattle, Lockheed in Burbank, Douglas in Santa Monica, Philco in Pasadena, North American in Columbus, Bell in Buffalo, and Martin in Baltimore. All these companies were extremely cooperative and candid. At the completion of the investigation we felt assured that there was enough information at hand to come to a consensus. The committee's recommendation to Dr. Bisplinghoff, Mel Rosche, and Doug Michel at NASA Headquarters was
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fatal Gun Accident Tuesday Claims Life of 18-Year-Old
    1 WEATHER QUOTE , ' Max: Min. Preclp. Thursday, June 26. .88 04 0.00 Friday, June 27.......63 08 0.00 "We find, scarcely any Saturday,June28 ..77 69 0.00 Sunday, June 29 .... 86 57 0.00 persons of good sense save Monday, June 30... 69 53 0.00 those who agree with us." Tuesday, July 1.......73 54 0.00 —La Rochefoucauld. Wednesday, July 2.. 80 57 0.00 kONE HUNDRED-ELEVENTH YEAR No. 4 16 Pages This Week CHELSEA, MICHIGAN, THURSDAY, JULY 3, 1980 USPS 101-720 25C per copy SUBSCRIPTION: $8.00 PER YEAR Fatal Gun Accident Tuesday Claims Life of 18-Year-Old A tragic accident with a gun enter the chamber the first time the First Congregational Church that was supposed to be unloaded Koch pulled the bolt, but then of Chelsea and was employed at claimed the life of an 18-year-old chambered when he racked the the Fox Village Theater at Maple Chelsea man Monday afternoon. gun twice more. Village. Todd Wright, ld 1980 Chelsea Wright was taken by am­ Surviving are his father, Robin High school graduate, died at bulance to Chelsea Hospital Wright of Saline; his mother and University of Michigan Hospital emergency room, where his con­ step-father, Nell (Wireman) and Monday, brief hours after being dition was stabilized. He was then J. Glenn Culler of Dexter; pater­ accidentally shot through the transferred to University nal grandmother, Elnora Wright heart with a .22 calibre rifle. Hospital in Ann Arbor, where he of Chelsea; paternal grandfather died shortly after arrival.
    [Show full text]
  • HHE Report No. HETA-90-0368-2137, Rockwell
    ThisThis Heal Healthth Ha Hazzardard E Evvaluaaluationtion ( H(HHHEE) )report report and and any any r ereccoommmmendendaatitonsions m madeade herein herein are are f orfor t hethe s sppeeccifiicfic f afacciliilityty e evvaluaaluatedted and and may may not not b bee un univeriverssaalllyly appappliliccabable.le. A Anyny re reccoommmmendaendatitoionnss m madeade are are n noot tt oto be be c consonsideredidered as as f ifnalinal s statatetemmeenntsts of of N NIOIOSSHH po polilcicyy or or of of any any agen agenccyy or or i ndindivivididuualal i nvoinvolvlved.ed. AdditionalAdditional HHE HHE repor reportsts are are ava availilabablele at at h htttptp:/://ww/wwww.c.cddcc.gov.gov/n/nioiosshh/hhe/hhe/repor/reportsts ThisThis HealHealtthh HaHazzardard EEvvaluaaluattionion ((HHHHEE)) reportreport andand anyany rreeccoommmmendendaattiionsons mmadeade hereinherein areare fforor tthehe ssppeecciifficic ffaacciliilittyy eevvaluaaluatteded andand maymay notnot bbee ununiiververssaallllyy appappapplililicccababablle.e.le. A AAnynyny re rerecccooommmmmmendaendaendattitiooionnnsss m mmadeadeade are areare n nnooott t t totoo be bebe c cconsonsonsiideredderedidered as asas f fifinalnalinal s ssttataatteteemmmeeennnttstss of ofof N NNIIOIOOSSSHHH po popolliilccicyyy or oror of ofof any anyany agen agenagencccyyy or oror i indndindiivviviiddiduuualalal i invonvoinvollvvlved.ed.ed. AdditionalAdditional HHEHHE reporreporttss areare avaavaililabablele atat hhtttpp::///wwwwww..ccddcc..govgov//nnioiosshh//hhehhe//reporreporttss This Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) report and any recommendations made herein are for the specific facility evaluated and may not be universally applicable. Any recommendations made are not to be considered as final statements of NIOSH policy or of any agency or individual involved. Additional HHE reports are available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/reports HETA 90-368-2137 NIOSH INVESTIGATOR: September 1991 John A.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockwell Automation, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ____________ Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 Commission file number 1-12383 Rockwell Automation, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 25-1797617 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 1201 South 2 nd Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: +1 (414) 382-2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act : Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $1 Par Value New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☑ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Fix » Some Companies Don’T Wait for Lightning to Strike
    Fuel Fix » Some companies don’t wait for lightning to strike Home EnergyWatch Washington Loren Steffy Voices Jobs chron.com Some companies don’t wait for lightning to strike CATEGORIES Posted on by in , , March 18, 2013 at 6:57 am Jeannie Kever Natural Gas Oil Oil field services Select Category Comments(0) | E-mail | Print Tweet 3 Like Like 9 0 Back in Ben Franklin’s day, no one worried about lightning causing a chemical tank to explode or shutting down the electronic controls to a nuclear reactor. Technology has raised the stakes since Franklin invented the lightning rod – lightning-sparked fires caused more than $1 billion in insured homeowners’ losses in 2010 alone, according to the Insurance Information Institute. The costs can be even higher for the oil and gas industry; a 2006 study published in the Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries found lightning strikes are the most common cause of accidents involving storage tanks at refineries and petrochemical plants. Lightning storm over Albuquerque, N.M. (Roch Hart/Barcroft Media) RECENT POSTS “For the guys who’ve been around for 30 or 40 years, it’s not Judge sets hearing for ‘fictitious claims’ in Gulf oil spill if, it’s when they’re going to get hit,” said Matt Jones, project Markets steady but remain wary manager for Ashley Automation & Technology, an industrial electrical firm that works mostly in the oil fields. And while Hacked PCs falsify billions of ad clicks lightning is hardly the only risk for oil and gas production and other facilities, it’s a big one, said David Miller, director of Persian Gulf oil power takes a shine to solar Obama faces battle to woo Israeli public standards for the American Petroleum Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Matching Gift Programs * Please Note, This List Is Not All Inclusive
    Companies With Matching Gift Programs * Please note, this list is not all inclusive. If your employer is not listed, please check with human resources to see if your company matches and the guidelines for matches. A AlliedSignal Inc. Archer Daniels Midland 3Com Corporation Allstate Foundation, Allstate Giving ARCO Chemical Co. 3M Company Altera Corp. Contributions Program Ares Advanced Technology AAA Altria Employee Involvement Ares Management LLC Abacus Capital Investments Altria Group Argonaut Group Inc. Abbot Laboratories AMB Group Aristokraft Inc. Accenture Foundation, Inc. Ambac Arkansas Best Corporation Access Group, Inc. AMD Corporate Giving Arkwright Mutual Insurance Co. ACE INA Foundation American Express Co. Armco Inc. Acsiom Corp. American Express Foundation Armstrong Foundation Adams Harkness and Hill Inc. American Fidelity Corp. Arrow Electronics Adaptec Foundation American General Corp. Arthur J. Gallagher ADC Foundation American Honda Motor Co. Inc. Ashland Oil Foundation, Inc. ADC Telecommunications American Inter Group Aspect Global Giving Program Adobe Systems Inc. American International Group, Inc. Aspect Telecommunications Associates ADP Foundation American National Bank and Trust Co. Corp. of North America A & E Television Networks of Chicago Assurant Health AEGON TRANSAMERICA American Standard Foundation Astra Merck Inc. AEP American Stock Exchange AstraZeneca Pharmaceutical LP AES Corporation Ameriprise Financial Atapco A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co. Ameritech Corp. ATK Foundation Aetna Foundation, Inc. Amgen Center Atlantic Data Services Inc. AG Communications Systems Amgen Foundation Atochem North America Foundation Agilent Technologies Amgen Inc. ATOFINA Chemicals, Inc. Aid Association for Lutherans AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. ATO FINA Pharmaceutical Foundation AIG Matching Grants Program Corporate Giving Program AT&T Aileen S. Andrew Foundation AmSouth BanCorp.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Matching Funds
    Increase the size of your gift with a Matching Gift! 1. What is a Matching Gift Program? 2. How does a Matching Gift Program Work? 3. Does it work? 4. List of companies that have Matching Gift Programs? 1. What is a Matching Gift Program? Many companies allow their employees to direct their charitable giving programs through matching gifts. When an employee notifies the company that he/she has made a charitable donation, the company will make a gift of the same amount, and in some cases double the amount, to the same charitable organization. Matching Gift Programs are a wonderful way for employees to make their charitable dollars stretch farther at no cost to themselves. Simply ask your company's human resources office for a matching gift form and we will do the rest! Below is a partial list of companies with matching gift programs. Even if you do not find your employer on this list, be sure to check with your human resources office, personnel department, or community relations office. 2. How does a Matching Gift Program Work? It is extremely easy to process. Gift matching procedures can vary from company to company. The following example is typical. 1. An employee/retiree gets a matching gift form from the employer, usually from the human resource department or company website. 2. After completing the form, the employee/retiree sends it along with the donation to the educational institution or nonprofit charity. 3. The nonprofit certifies on the form that it has received the gift and meets the company’s guidelines for receiving a matching gift.
    [Show full text]
  • Employee Matching Gift Programs
    EMPLOYEE MATCHING GIFT PROGRAMS The following companies are among those ofering gift matching programs to employees. To request a matching gift, just fill out the form on your corporate web site or request a form from your HR department, and send the completed form together with your contribution to: GRREAT PO Box 3069 Falls Church, VA 22043-0069 We’ll complete the form and provide any documentation needed to secure the matching contribution. And if your employer isn’t listed below, please contact your HR department – we may have simply failed to include your company. If that’s the case, please call the GRREAT phone line (703-620-6593) or email us ([email protected], with “matching gift” in the subject line), and we’ll update our list to include your employer. And our sincere thanks for supporting GRREAT! Abbott Laboratories Fund American Honda A Accenture American International Group, Inc. Acuson Adaptec, Inc. Ameritech Addison Wesley Longman Amgen Adobe Systems, Inc. Analog Devices, Inc. Advanced Fibre Communications Anchor Brewing Company Advanced Micro Devices Anheuser-Busch Foundation AES Corporation Aon Foundation Aetna Foundation Archer Daniels Midland Air Products & Chemicals Inc. ARCO Foundation Albetson's Inc. Aramark Corp Alcoa Foundation Argonaut Group, Inc. Alex Brown & Sons, Inc. Arkwright Foundation, Inc. Alexander & Baldwin Foundation Arthur J. Gallagher Foundation Allegheny Technologies Aspect Telecommunications Allendale Mutual Insurance Company AT&T Foundation Alliance Bank ATV Capital Management, Inc. Alliance Capital Management, LP Autodesk, Inc. Allstate Foundation Automatic Data Processing, Inc. Alliant Techsystems Avery Deninison Corp ALZA Corporation Avon American Express Foundation Axa Foundation Bakar, Gerson Foundation Best Foods B Bank of America Foundation Bethlehem Steel Corporation Bank of California, NA Black & Decker Matching Gifts Bankers Trust Foundation Blauvelt Demarest Foundation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies with Matching Gift Programs
    Companies with Matching Gift Programs Many companies encourage charitable giving by matching gifts made by their employees. As a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, CHCA is eligible for matching gifts. Below is a list of companies that have matching gift programs. Even if a company is not listed, they may still have a matching gift program. In addition, not all companies match PK-12 schools. To find out if your company matches gifts made to CHCA, please contact your HR representative. If you need additional assistance, please e-mail Paige Tomlin at [email protected]. A AK Steel 3Com Corporation Albemarle Corp. 3M Company Alco Standard AlliedSignal Inc. Alexander and Baldwin Inc. Allstate Alexander Hamilton Life Abacus Capital Investments Alexander Haas Martin and Partners Abbott Laboratories Al Neyer Altera Corp. Contributions Allegro Microsystems Inc. Accenture Alliance Bernstein Access Fund Alliance Capital Management L.P. ACE INA Foundation Alliance Coal LLC Adams Harkness and Hill Inc. Alliant Techsystems Altria Group Allegiance Corp. and Baxter International Adaptec Foundation Allendale Insurance Foundation AMBAC Indemnity American Natl Bank & Trust ADC Telecommunications American Intl Group, Inc. AMD Corporate Giving American Standard Found Adobe Systems Inc. Amgen Inc. ADP Foundation AMN Healthcare Services American Express Co. AmSouth BanCorp. A & E Television Networks American Stock Exchange AEGON TRANSAMERICA Ameriprise Financial AEP Ameritech Corp. AES Corporation AMETEK / Sealtron A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co. AMSTED Industries Inc. American Fidelity Corp. Amylin Pharmaceuticals Aetna Foundation, Inc. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. American General Corp. Analytics Operations Engineering AG Communications Systems Analog Devices Inc. American Honda Motor Co. Avon Products Foundation, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Coe College Board of Trustees Profiles
    COE COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES PROFILES J. DAVID CARSON – CHAIR (2000-2019) Dave Carson is originally from Chicago and presently lives in Northville, Michigan (west suburb of Detroit). Dave was a member of the senior global finance executive team at Ford Motor Company when he retired in January 2007; during his 33–year career he was based both in Detroit and in Europe. Since retiring, he has been an advisor to several companies. Dave graduated from Coe in 1972, majoring in economics and business administration, and earned an MBA from the University of Iowa. Prior to joining Ford, he taught at Coe for two years. He has been a member of the Coe Board of Trustees since 2000. He and his wife, Mary (Bridenstine) Carson ’73, have an adult son and daughter. Dave loves golf, reading and traveling. KEN GOLDER – VICE CHAIR (2007-2019) Ken Golder, originally from Winnetka, Illinois, is a “semi-retired” Real Estate Investor and Hotelier. He graduated from Coe in 1982 with an interdisciplinary bachelor’s degree in communication techniques. Ken has almost 30 years of experience in the hotel industry and has held various positions with Americana, Registry, Holiday Inn Corporation and Promus Hotels (Embassy Suites). He is a Certified Hospitality Marketing Executive (CHME), past Board Member of the St. Paul Convention & Visitors Authority, and former President of the Minnesota Hospitality Sales & Marketing Association. Since 2000, Ken has acquired and manages a variety of hotel properties including: Holiday Inn – St. Paul Downtown; Holiday Inn Express – Deerfield, Illinois; and Staybridge Suites Airport – Columbus, Ohio. He and his wife, Sue (Roe) Golder ’82, have lived in Apple Valley, Minnesota since 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • RS-00019, "Radiation Survey of the Downey Facility", May 7, 2001
    Engineering Product Document ;O Number StA Number Page 1 of Total Pages Rev. LtrIChg. No. Number See Summary of Chg. 10054 13333 103 I 03 NEW RS-00019 Yogram Title ladiation Safety Iocument Title ladiation Survey of the Downey Facility Iocument Type Related Documents hgineering Product Document kiginal Issue Date Approvals Date /1 101 P. Rutherford Irepared ByIDate D&C' MailtAddr I, Liddy 08- 5/&641 TO38 S. Reeder /- 641 TO38 3&D Program? Yes II] No N Yes, Enter Authorization No. , Distribution Abstract Name This document describes a radiation survey of a portion of the Downey J. Barnes Facility. This survey is designed to verify that the Downey Facility has no1 been impacted by radiological operations associated with the Water Boile P. Rutherford ~eutron'source(WBNS) reactor. Measurements taken demonstrated M. Lee that clean-up standards promulgated by the Department of Energy, P. Liddy Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and Department of Heafth Services R. McGinnis were met, and that there was no indication of any residual contamination 8. Copeland in the facility. Accordingly, the area is suitable for release for unrestricted use. IP.Yeh Rad Safety Files (5) Engineering Data Mgmt Facility Release Files Reserved for ProprietaryILegal Notice No Asterisk, Title PageISummary or Change Page Only. ocketdyne Form 651-F RN.2-97 RS-0001 9 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Surnrnafy............................................................................................................. 4 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alex-Anikina-Cosmic-Shift-Russian-Contemporary-Art-Writing.Pdf
    Cosmic Shift Cosmic Shift Russian Contemporary Art Writing Contents Foreword – Bart De Baere ix Acknowledgments – Elena Zaytseva and Alex Anikina xv Introduction – Elena Zaytseva 1 Part One Past futures 1 Keti Chukhrov 25 The nomadic theater of the communist 2 Ilya and Emilia Kabakov 33 The center of cosmic energy 3 Boris Groys 53 The truth of art 4 Andrey Monastyrsky 69 VDNKh, the capital of the world 5 Anton Vidokle 91 The Communist Revolution was caused by the Sun Part Two Inherited aesthetics 6 Joseph Backstein 111 History of angels 7 Dmitry Gutov and Anatoly Osmolovsky 127 Concerning abstractionism 8 Olga Chernysheva 157 Screens 9 Dmitry Prigov 171 Two manifestos 10 Maria Chehonadskih 191 The form of art as mediation 11 Artemy Magun 209 Soviet communism and the paradox of alienation 12 Alexander Brener 231 The Russian avant-garde as an uncontrollable beast Part Three From the archive 13 Vadim Zakharov 247 Author, cosmos, archive 14 Bogdan Mamonov 259 A binary system 15 Maria Kapajeva 267 You can call him another man 16 Andrey Kuzkin 283 Running to the nest 17 Masha Sumnina 301 Brink, kerbside, fence, margin Part Four Russia, today 18 Ilya Budraitskis 313 A heritage without an heir 19 Dmitry Venkov 333 Krisis 20 Gleb Napreenko 341 Questions without answers, answers without questions 21 Gluklya (Natalia Pershina-Yakimanskaya) 353 The Utopian Union of the Unemployed 22 Dmitry Vilensky 371 Chto Delat? and method 23 Yevgeny Granilshchikov 383 Weakness Part Five Future futures 24 Oxana Timofeeva 399 Ultra black 25 Arseny Zhilyaev 413 Demand full automation of contemporary art 26 Alex Anikina 433 The Antichthon 27 Ivan Novikov 461 I want to be afraid of the forest 28 Pavel Pepperstein 467 The skyscraper-cleaner pine marten About the contributors 489 Text credits 500 Image credits 503 Index 506 Foreword A REPORT FROM THE CENTER OF THE WORLD Strangely enough, the center of the world is out of view at this moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Previews #323 (Vol
    PREVIEWS #323 (VOL. XXV #8, AUG15) PREVIEWS PUBLICATIONS PREVIEWS #325 OCTOBER 2015 SAME GREAT PREVIEWS! NEW LOWER PRICE: $3.99! Since 1988, PREVIEWS has been your ultimate source for all of the comics and merchandise to be available from your local comic book shop… revealed up to two months in advance! Hundreds of comics and graphic novels from the best comic publishers; the coolest pop-culture merchandise on Earth; plus PREVIEWS exclusive items available nowhere else! Now more than ever, PREVIEWS is here to show the tales, toys and treasures in your future! This October issue features items scheduled to ship in December 2015 and beyond. Catalog, 8x11, 500+pg, PC SRP: $3.99 MARVEL PREVIEWS VOLUME 2 #39 Each issue of Marvel Previews is a comic book-sized, 120-page, full-color guide and preview to all of Marvel’s upcoming releases — it’s your #1 source for advanced information on Marvel Comics! This October issue features items scheduled to ship in December 2015 and beyond. FREE w/Purchase of PREVIEWS Comic-sized, 120pg, FC SRP: $1.25 PREVIEWS #325 CUSTOMER ORDER FORM — OCTOBER 2015 PREVIEWS makes it easy for you to order every item in the catalog with this separate order form booklet! This October issue features items scheduled to ship in December 2015 and beyond. Comic-sized, 62pg, PC SRP: PI COMICS SECTION PREMIER VENDORS DARK HORSE COMICS ABE SAPIEN #27 Mike Mignola (W/Cover), Scott Allie (W), Alise Gluškova (A/C), and Dave Stewart (C) Abe’s memories of his life as a man in the nineteenth century come to the surface as secret societies fight over an object that could prove the true origins of the human race! FC, 32 pages SRP: $3.50 B.P.R.D.
    [Show full text]