Neutrino Experiments 15 20 Reference Geo "E [8]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neutrino Experiments 15 20 Reference Geo 4 20 40 4! Data - BG - best-fit osci. 2 Neutrino Experiments 15 20 Reference Geo "e [8] # $ 10 3! 0 5 2! 1! 120 KamLAND data best-fit osci. 1 2 3 4 5 6 ! ! KamLAND ! ! ! ! accidental Fundamental95% C.L. Symmetries100 and Neutrinos: 99% C.L. ) 99.73% C.L. 80 2 -4 best fit 10 Events / 0.2 MeV 60 13 16 (eV C(!,n) O 2 In21 Search of the New40 Standard Model best-fit Geo "e m best-fit osci. + BG $ 20 + best-fit Geo "e Solar 0 95% C.L. 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 99% C.L. Ep (MeV) 99.73% C.L. excluding absolutebest fit neutrino mass and 0νββ experiments FIG. 3: The low-energy region of the νe spectrum relevant for geo- 10-1 1 10 20 30 40 neutrinos. The main panel shows the data with the fitted background and geo-neutrino contributions; the upper panel compares the back- tan2" $#2 12 ground and reactor νe subtracted data to the number of geo-neutrinos for the decay chains of U (dashed) and Th (dotted) calculated from a FIG. 2: Allowed region for neutrino oscillation parameters from geological reference model [8]. KamLAND and solar neutrino experiments. The side-panels show 2 the ∆⇥ -profiles for KamLAND (dashed) and solar experiments 1.15 Data - BG - Geo ! 70 (dotted) individually, as well as the combination of the two (solid). e 60 Expectation based on osci. parameters expected 50 1 1.1 2 determined by KamLAND / N 40 30 5 detected 20 we also expect geo-neutrinos. We observe 1609 events. 0.8 3 N 1.05 10 1 Figure 1 shows the prompt energy spectrum of selected 0 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 electron anti-neutrino events and the fitted backgrounds. The 0.6 2 sin 213 unbinned data is assessed with a maximum likelihood fit to 1 two-flavor neutrino oscillation (with θ13 = 0), simultaneously 0.4 EH1 EH2 fitting the geo-neutrino contribution. The method incorporates Survival Probability 0.95 0.2 the absolute time of the event to account for time variations EH3 in the reactor flux and includes Earth-matter oscillation ef- 0.9 0 fects. The best-fit is shown in Fig. 1. The joint confidence 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2 +0.14 +0.15 5 2 intervals give ∆m = 7.58 (stat) (syst) 10− eV Weighted Baseline [km] 21 0.13 0.15 L0/E (km/MeV) 2 +0.10 − +0.10 − ×2 !e and tan θ12 = 0.56 0.07(stat) 0.06(syst) for tan θ12<1. A − − scaled reactor spectrum without distortions from neutrino os- FIG. 4: Ratio of the background and geo-neutrino subtracted νe cillation is excluded at more than 5⇤. An independent anal- spectrum to the expectation for no-oscillation as a function of 2 +0.22 ysis using cuts similar to Ref. [2] finds ∆m21 = 7.66 0.20 L0/E. L0 is the effective baseline taken as a flux-weighted aver- − × 5 2 2 +0.16 age (L0 = 180 km); the energy bins are equal probability bins of the 10− eV and tan θ12 = 0.52 0.10. − best-fit including all backgrounds (see Fig. 1). The histogram and The allowed contours in the neutrino oscillation parame- 2 curve show the expectation accounting for the distances to the indi- ter space, including ∆⌅ -profiles, are shown in Fig. 2. Only vidual reactors, time-dependent flux variations and efficiencies. The the so-called LMA I region remains, while other regions error bars are statistical and do not include correlated systematic un- previously allowed by KamLAND at 2.2⇤ are disfavored certainties in the energy scale. ⇥ at more than 4⇤. When considering three-neutrino oscilla- Karsten2 M. Heeger tion, the KamLAND data give the same result for ∆m21, and a slightly increased uncertainty on θ12. The parame- Fig. 3. The time of the event gives additional discrimination ter space can be further constrained by incorporatingUniversitythe re- power sinceof theWisconsinreactor contribution varies. The fit yields 25 sults of SNO [15] and solar flux experiments [16] in a two- and 36 detected geo-neutrino events from the U and Th-decay neutrino analysis with KamLAND assuming CPT invariance. chains, respectively, but there is a strong anti-correlation. Fix- The oscillation parameters from this combined analysis are ing the Th/U mass ratio to 3.9 from planetary data [17], we 2 +0.21 5 2 2 +0.06 ∆m21 = 7.59 0.21 10− eV and tan θ12 = 0.47 0.05. obtain a combined U+Th best-fit value of 73 27 events cor- − × − 6 ±2 1 In order to assess the number of geo-neutrinos, we fit the responding to a flux of (4.4 1.6) 10 cm− s− , in agree- ± × normalization of the energy spectrum of ⇥e from the U and ment with the geological reference model. Th-decay chains simultaneously with the neutrino oscillation The ratio of the background-subtracted ⇥e candidate events, parameter estimation using the KamLANDNSAC,and solar data; seeSeptemberincluding the subtraction of7,geo-neutrinos, 2012to the expectation Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin NSAC, September 7, 2012 1 Towards Precision Neutrino Physics solar neutrino problem oscillation searches precision measurements SNO, KamLAND 2010 Ga Cl SK Daya Bay, DC, RENO 2012 1960-1990 1990-2000 2000 - Present Neutrino mass and mixing first physics beyond the SM → precision studies Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin NSAC, September 7, 2012 2 Neutrino Oscillation Measurements Recent Observations • atmospheric νμ and νμ disappear most likely to ντ (SK, MINOS) • accelerator νμ and νμ disappear at L~250, 700 km (K2K, T2K, MINOS) • some accelerator νμ appear as νμ at L~250, 700 km (T2K, MINOS) • solar νe convert to νμ/ντ (Cl, Ga, SK, SNO, Borexino) • reactor νe disappear at L~200 km (KamLAND) • reactor νe disappear at L~1 km (DC, Daya Bay RENO) KamLAND 2010 SK MINOS Experiments have demonstrated vacuum oscillation L/E pattern ⎛ L ⎞ P = sin2 2θ sin2⎜1.27 Δm2 ⎟ i→i ⎝ E ⎠ Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin NSAC, September 7, 2012 3 € Neutrino Oscillation Measurements Recent Observations • atmospheric νμ and νμ disappear most likely to ντ (SK, MINOS) • accelerator νμ and νμ disappear at L~250, 700 km (K2K, T2K, MINOS) • some accelerator νμ appear as νμ at L~250, 700 km (T2K, MINOS) • solar νe convert to νμ/ντ (Cl, Ga, SK, SNO, Borexino) • reactor νe disappear at L~200 km (KamLAND) • reactor νe disappear at L~1 km (DC, Daya Bay RENO) Borexino, SNO low-energy (LETA) solar ν Vacuum to matter transition (MSW conversion) in Sun has been observed Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin NSAC, September 7, 2012 4 Neutrino Oscillation Measurements Recent Observations • atmospheric νμ and νμ disappear most likely to ντ (SK, MINOS) • accelerator νμ and νμ disappear at L~250, 700 km (K2K, T2K, MINOS) • some accelerator νμ appear as νμ at L~250, 700 km (T2K, MINOS) • solar νe convert to νμ/ντ (Cl, Ga, SK, SNO, Borexino) • reactor νe disappear at L~200 km (KamLAND) • reactor νe disappear at L~1 km (DC, Daya Bay RENO) Dominant Important NP HEP Gonzalez-Garcia et al, ICHEP2012 complete suite of measurements can over-constrain the 3-ν framework NP neutrino experiments address unique set of questions and scientific goals US nuclear physicists have also played leading roles in HEP-funded experiments, such as reactor θ13 Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin NSAC, September 7, 2012 5 Measurement of Fundamental Parameters Mass Splittings KamLAND 2010 MINOS Nu2012 normal inverted Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin NSAC, September 7, 2012 6 Measurement of Fundamental Parameters Mass Splittings normal inverted KamLAND has measured Δm122 to ~2.8% Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin NSAC, September 7, 2012 7 Measurement of Fundamental Parameters Mixing Angles U Matrix # & MNSP# Ue1 Ue2 Ue3 & 0.8 0.5 Ue3 Maki,% Nakagawa, Sakata,( Pontecorvo% ( U U U U 0.4 0.6 0.7 = % µ1 µ2 µ 3( = % ( % ( % ( $ U"1 U" 2 U" 3 ' # $ 0.4 0.6 0.7& ' # Ue1 Ue2 Ue3 & 0.8 0.5 Ue3 % ( % ( U U U U 0.4 0.6 0.7 = % µ1 µ2 µ 3( = % ( % ( % ( $ U"1 U" 2 U" 3 ' $ 0.4 0.6 0.7 ' # *i, CP & # 1 0 0 & cos)13 0 e sin)13 # cos)12 sin)12 0& # 1 0 0 & % ( % ( % ( % i / 2 ( 0 cos sin 0 1 0 sin cos 0 0 e - 0 = % )23 )23 ( +% ( +% * )12 )12 ( +% ( % ( % i, CP ( % ( % i- / 2+i. ( $ 0 *sin)23 cos)23' # *e sin)13 0 *i, CPcos)13 & $ 0 0 1' $ 0 0 e ' # 1 0 0 & $ cos)13 0 e sin)13 ' # cos)12 sin)12 0& # 1 0 0 & % ( % ( % ( % i / 2 ( 0 cos sin 0 1 0 sin cos 0 0 e - 0 = % )23 )23 ( +% ( +% * )12 )12 ( +% ( % atmospheric, K2K( % reactori, CP and accelerator ( SNO,% solar SK, KamLAND( % 0νββi- / 2+i. ( $ 0 *sin)23 cos)23' $ *e sin)13 0 cos)13 ' $ 0 0 1' $ 0 0 e ' ! ! maximal? not so small large, but not maximal! As of 2012, all three neutrino mixing angles are known! Karsten Heeger, Univ. of Wisconsin NSAC, September 7, 2012 8 Measurement of Fundamental Parameters Mixing Angles U Matrix # & MNSP# Ue1 Ue2 Ue3 & 0.8 0.5 Ue3 Maki,% Nakagawa, Sakata,( Pontecorvo% ( U U U U 0.4 0.6 0.7 = % µ1 µ2 µ 3( = % ( % ( % ( $ U"1 U" 2 U" 3 ' # $ 0.4 0.6 0.7& ' # Ue1 Ue2 Ue3 & 0.8 0.5 Ue3 % ( % ( U U U U 0.4 0.6 0.7 = % µ1 µ2 µ 3( = % ( % ( % ( $ U"1 U" 2 U" 3 ' $ 0.4 0.6 0.7 ' # *i, CP & # 1 0 0 & cos)13 0 e sin)13 # cos)12 sin)12 0& # 1 0 0 & % ( % ( % ( % i / 2 ( 0 cos sin 0 1 0 sin cos 0 0 e - 0 = % )23 )23 ( +% ( +% * )12 )12 ( +% ( % ( % i, CP ( % ( % i- / 2+i.
Recommended publications
  • The Gran Sasso Underground Laboratory Program
    The Gran Sasso Underground Laboratory Program Eugenio Coccia INFN Gran Sasso and University of Rome “Tor Vergata” [email protected] XXXIII International Meeting on Fundamental Physics Benasque - March 7, 2005 Underground Laboratories Boulby UK Modane France Canfranc Spain INFN Gran Sasso National Laboratory LNGSLNGS ROME QuickTime™ and a Photo - JPEG decompressor are needed to see this picture. L’AQUILA Tunnel of 10.4 km TERAMO In 1979 A. Zichichi proposed to the Parliament the project of a large underground laboratory close to the Gran Sasso highway tunnel, then under construction In 1982 the Parliament approved the construction, finished in 1987 In 1989 the first experiment, MACRO, started taking data LABORATORI NAZIONALI DEL GRAN SASSO - INFN Largest underground laboratory for astroparticle physics 1400 m rock coverage cosmic µ reduction= 10–6 (1 /m2 h) underground area: 18 000 m2 external facilities Research lines easy access • Neutrino physics 756 scientists from 25 countries Permanent staff = 66 positions (mass, oscillations, stellar physics) • Dark matter • Nuclear reactions of astrophysics interest • Gravitational waves • Geophysics • Biology LNGS Users Foreigners: 356 from 24 countries Italians: 364 Permanent Staff: 64 people Administration Public relationships support Secretariats (visa, work permissions) Outreach Environmental issues Prevention, safety, security External facilities General, safety, electrical plants Civil works Chemistry Cryogenics Mechanical shop Electronics Computing and networks Offices Assembly halls Lab
    [Show full text]
  • THE BOREXINO IMPACT in the GLOBAL ANALYSIS of NEUTRINO DATA Settore Scientifico Disciplinare FIS/04
    UNIVERSITA’ DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO DIPARTIMENTO DI FISICA SCUOLA DI DOTTORATO IN FISICA, ASTROFISICA E FISICA APPLICATA CICLO XXIV THE BOREXINO IMPACT IN THE GLOBAL ANALYSIS OF NEUTRINO DATA Settore Scientifico Disciplinare FIS/04 Tesi di Dottorato di: Alessandra Carlotta Re Tutore: Prof.ssa Emanuela Meroni Coordinatore: Prof. Marco Bersanelli Anno Accademico 2010-2011 Contents Introduction1 1 Neutrino Physics3 1.1 Neutrinos in the Standard Model . .4 1.2 Massive neutrinos . .7 1.3 Solar Neutrinos . .8 1.3.1 pp chain . .9 1.3.2 CNO chain . 13 1.3.3 The Standard Solar Model . 13 1.4 Other sources of neutrinos . 17 1.5 Neutrino Oscillation . 18 1.5.1 Vacuum oscillations . 20 1.5.2 Matter-enhanced oscillations . 22 1.5.3 The MSW effect for solar neutrinos . 26 1.6 Solar neutrino experiments . 28 1.7 Reactor neutrino experiments . 33 1.8 The global analysis of neutrino data . 34 2 The Borexino experiment 37 2.1 The LNGS underground laboratory . 38 2.2 The detector design . 40 2.3 Signal processing and Data Acquisition System . 44 2.4 Calibration and monitoring . 45 2.5 Neutrino detection in Borexino . 47 2.5.1 Neutrino scattering cross-section . 48 2.6 7Be solar neutrino . 48 2.6.1 Seasonal variations . 50 2.7 Radioactive backgrounds in Borexino . 51 I CONTENTS 2.7.1 External backgrounds . 53 2.7.2 Internal backgrounds . 54 2.8 Physics goals and achieved results . 57 2.8.1 7Be solar neutrino flux measurement . 57 2.8.2 The day-night asymmetry measurement . 58 2.8.3 8B neutrino flux measurement .
    [Show full text]
  • BOREXINO - Status and Calibration
    BOREXINO - Status and Calibration International Workshop on "Double Beta Decay and Neutrinos" Osaka, June 12, 2007 Christian Grieb for the Borexino Collaboration Virginia Tech Borexino Collaboration • College de France (France) • Technische Unversität München (Germany) • JINR Dubna (Russia) • Kurchatov Institute Moscow (Russia) • MPI Heidelberg (Germany) • Jagellonian University Cracow (Poland) • INFN – Milano (Italy) • INFN – Genova (Italy) • INFN – Perugia (Italy) • INFN – LNGS (Italy) • Princeton Univeristy (USA) NSF funded • Virginia Tech (USA) } Borexino Christian Grieb, Virginia Tech, June 2007 Borexino • Designed to spectroscopically measure low energy solar neutrinos, especially 7Be • Liquid Scintillator Spectrometer • ν + e - → ν’ + e -’ • Charged Current • Neutral Current Borexino Christian Grieb, Virginia Tech, June 2007 Signal in Borexino 7 +++ −−− →→→ 7 +++ ννν Be e Li e Monochromatic E ννν=862 keV Φ 9 ν 2 SSM =4.8x10 /sec/cm ννν ννν e x Expected rate (LMA) is ~35 counts/day between 0.25-0.8 MeV Borexino Christian Grieb, Virginia Tech, June 2007 Science in Borexino • Measure 7Be solar neutrinos (0.25-0.8 MeV) • Measured vs MSW-LMA predicted event rate • 1/r^2 solar signature • Study CNO and pep (~1-2 pep ev/d) neutrinos (0.8-1.3 MeV) (rejection of 11 C 8B-neutrinos cosmogenic background – proven in CTF (SuperK, SNO) hep-ex/0601035) • Geoneutrinos (10 – 30 ev/year) • Supernova Neutrinos (~120 ev from GC 7 supernova) Be neutrinos (BOREXINO) • Double beta decay with Xenon? (Phys.Rev.Lett. 72:1411,1994) • ... Borexino Christian Grieb, Virginia Tech, June 2007 Publications (since 2002) • The Nylon Scintillator Containment Vessels for the Borexino Solar Neutrino Experiment. • J. Benziger et al. Feb 2007 physics/0702162 • CNO and pep neutrino spectroscopy in Borexino: Measurement of the deep-underground production of cosmogenic C11 in an organic liquid scintillator • H.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Large-Scale Neutrino Detectors No Detectors
    LARGE-SCALE NEUTRINO DETECTORS input for the 2020 update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics from the Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences Contact person: Prof. Leonid Kravchuk, Director, INR RAS, 60th October Anniversary prospect 7A, 117312, Moscow, Russia Tel.: +7 495 8504201 e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: We propose a multi-purpose neutrino observatory comprising two very large detectors solving different problems at the intersection of particle physics, astrophysics and Earth science. Baikal-GVD will work jointly with KM3NET and IceCube in the Global Neutrino Network, aiming at the detection and study of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos. The new Baksan neutrino telescope (NBNT) will inherit from its smaller precursor, Borexino, but will become the only large-scale neutrino detector geographically located in Europe. Thanks to the unique low-background conditions at Baksan, determined by a combination of depth and of location far from artificial nuclear reactors, it will be the best instrument in the world to measure the CNO solar neutrino flux, at the same time addressing a wide range of other problems. Moscow, December 13, 2018 Comprehensive overview Development of many areas in modern physics, astrophysics and related fields is closely related to the neutrino studies. Neutrinos may bring the key to the way the Standard Model (SM) should be extended: in fact, it is the neutrino oscillations which violate the SM conservation laws (lepton numbers of individual generations) and give the only laboratory proof of the SM incompleteness. The discovery of the oscillations in the solar neutrinos gave a bright example of the application of astrophysical results to understanding of basic properties of elementary particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Retrospect of GALLEX/GNO
    10th Int. Conf. on Topics in Astroparticle and Underground Physics (TAUP2007) IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 120 (2008) 052013 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/120/5/052013 Retrospect of GALLEX/GNO Till Kirsten Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. After the completion of the gallium solar neutrino experiments at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso (GALLEX, GNO), we shortly summarize the major achievements. Among them are the first observation of solar pp-neutrinos and the recognition of a substantial (40%) deficit of sub-MeV solar neutrinos that called for νe transformations enabled by non- vanishing neutrino masses. We also inform about a recent complete re-analysis of the GALLEX data evaluation and reflect on the causes for the termination of GNO. From our gallium data we extract the e-e survival probability Pee for pp-neutrinos after subtraction of the 8B and 7Be contributions based on the experimentally determined 8B- (SNO/SK) and 7Be- (Borexino) neutrino fluxes as Pee(pp only) = 0.52 ± 0.12. 1. Introduction The Gallium solar neutrino experiments at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso have been terminated for external non-scientific reasons. This triggers a short retrospect of the achievements of GALLEX and GNO (Section 2). In Section 3 we report on a recent update that is based on data that were impossible to acquire before completion of the low rate measurement phase (solar runs). After some reflections on the causes for the termination of the gallium experiments at Gran Sasso (Section 4), I give a first quantitative estimate of the separate pp solar neutrino production (Section 5).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1912.09486V3 [Hep-Ph] 10 Jun 2021 Neutrinos and Their Interactions Unless Additional Particle IV
    Dark Matter Annihilation to Neutrinos Carlos A. Arguelles,¨ 1, ∗ Alejandro Diaz,2, y Ali Kheirandish,3, z Andr´esOlivares-Del-Campo,4, x Ibrahim Safa,5, 1, { and Aaron C. Vincent6, 7, 8, ∗∗ 1Department of Physics & Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA 3Department of Physics & Center for Multimessenger Astrophysics Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA 16802 USA 4Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology (IPPP), Durham University, Durham, UK 5Department of Physics & Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA 6Department of Physics, Engineering Physics and Astronomy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada 7Arthur B. McDonald Canadian Astroparticle Physics Research Institute, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada 8Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, ON N2L 2Y5, Canada We review the annihilation of dark matter into neutrinos over a range of dark matter masses from MeV=c2 to ZeV=c2. Thermally-produced models of dark matter are ex- pected to self-annihilate to standard model products. As no such signal has yet been detected, we turn to neutrino detectors to constrain the \most invisible channel." We review the experimental techniques that are used to detect neutrinos, and revisit the expected contributions to the neutrino flux at current and upcoming neutrino experi- ments. We place updated constraints on the dark matter self-annhilation cross section to neutrinos hσvi using the most recently available data, and forecast the sensitivity of upcoming experiments such as Hyper-Kamiokande, DUNE, and IceCube Gen-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2008.10279V2 [Hep-Ph] 4 Jun 2021
    Constraints on General Light Mediators from PandaX-II Electron Recoil Data Amir N. Khan1, ∗ 1Max-Planck-Institut f¨urKernphysik, Postfach 103980, D-69029 Heidelberg, Germany (Dated: June 7, 2021) PandaX-II has analyzed their complete data set of the electron recoil energy spectrum and has confirmed the XENON1T (1-7) keV excess, although the excess was also found compatible with the total background. Treating the background as well known, in which case it provides a good fit to the observed spectrum, one can expect stronger constraints on any new physics model with this data. With this motivation, we derive constraints on the new general vector (V), axial-vector (A), scalar (S) and pseudoscalar (P) interactions if any of them contribute to the neutrino-electron elastic −7 scattering. The derived constraints on the couplings at 90% C.L., respectively, are gV 0 . 32 × 10 −7 −7 for the mediator mass . 10 keV, gA0 . 34 × 10 for mass . 10 keV, gS . 49 × 10 for mass . 20 −7 keV and gP . 67 × 10 for mass . 30 keV. I. INTRODUCTION those from ref. [8] and other experiments. To be more specific, here we will investigate the possibility of general Recently, PandaX-II has observed an excess in the elec- neutrino nonstandard interactions that could modify the tron recoil energy spectrum [1] following a similar obser- neutrino-electron elastic scattering at the low energy end vation by XENON1T [2]. The expected background lies of the observed energy spectrum. within 1σ of the experimental error in the (1−7) keV re- Treating the background reported by PandaX-II as coil energy region.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlight Talk from Super-Kamiokande †
    Communication Highlight Talk from Super-Kamiokande † Yuuki Nakano and on behalf of the Super-Kamiokande Collaboration Kamioka Observatory, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, The University of Tokyo, Higashi-Mozumi 456, Kamioka-cho, Hida-city Gifu 506-1205, Japan; [email protected]; Tel.: +81-578-85-9665 † This paper is based on the talk at the 7th International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics (ICNFP 2018), Crete, Greece, 4–12 July 2018. Received: 30 November 2018; Accepted: 7 January 2019; Published: 9 January 2019 Abstract: Super-Kamiokande (SK), a 50 kton water Cherenkov detector in Japan, is observing both atmospheric and solar neutrinos. It is also searching for supernova (relic) neutrinos, proton decays and dark matter-like particles. A three-flavor oscillation analysis was conducted with the atmospheric neutrino data to study the mass hierarchy, the leptonic CP violation term, and other oscillation parameters. In addition, the observation of solar neutrinos gives precise measurements of the energy spectrum and oscillation parameters. In this proceedings, we given an overview of the latest results from SK and the prospect toward the future project of SK-Gd. Keywords: Super-Kamiokande; atmospheric neutrino; solar neutrino; neutrino oscillation; CP violation; proton decay 1. Introduction A theoretical framework of neutrino oscillation has been established in the past 50 years [1,2]. Neutrino physics has been dominated by the measurement of oscillation parameters and such measurements suggest that neutrinos are massive and mixing in the lepton sector [3]. Within the three- 2 2 flavor framework, three mixing angles (q12, q23, and q13) and two mass splittings (Dm21 and Dm32,31) are measured among neutrino experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Measurement of the Pp Solar Neutrino Interaction Rate in Borexino
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Spring August 2014 Direct Measurement of the pp Solar Neutrino Interaction Rate in Borexino Keith Otis University of Massachusetts - Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Elementary Particles and Fields and String Theory Commons, and the The Sun and the Solar System Commons Recommended Citation Otis, Keith, "Direct Measurement of the pp Solar Neutrino Interaction Rate in Borexino" (2014). Doctoral Dissertations. 123. https://doi.org/10.7275/nh2x-z694 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/123 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF THE PP SOLAR NEUTRINO INTERACTION RATE IN BOREXINO A Dissertation Presented by KEITH OTIS Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2014 Physics c Copyright by Keith Otis 2014 All Rights Reserved DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF THE PP SOLAR NEUTRINO INTERACTION RATE IN BOREXINO A Dissertation Presented by KEITH OTIS Approved as to style and content by: Andrea Pocar, Chair Laura Cadonati, Member Krishna Kumar, Member Grant Wilson, Member Rory Miskimen, Department Chair Physics To my family; you have each helped me become who I am today.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Neutrinos
    Neutrino physics: Theory and experiment (SS2021) Solar neutrinos Teresa Marrod´anUndagoitia Max-Planck-Institut f¨urKernphysik, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Contents 1 Lecture 3: Solar neutrinos2 1.1 Standard solar model.............................2 1.2 Neutrino production.............................3 1.3 Radiochemical experiments..........................5 1.4 Real time experiments............................8 1.5 Reminder: Neutrino oscillations in matter................. 14 1.6 Summary................................... 15 1 LECTURE 3: SOLAR NEUTRINOS 1. Lecture 3: Solar neutrinos This lecture discusses the emission of neutrinos by the Sun and some of the measurements performed so far. Solar neutrinos help to understand better the Sun itself but they also provide an intense source of ν's to investigate their properties. Indeed solar neutrinos have played a key role to understand neutrino oscillations. 1.1. Standard solar model Our Sun is in the most stable and long evolutionary phase of a star where hydrogen is consumed in its core (in the main sequence). A common tool to learn about the interior of the Sun is helioseismology, a methodology which employs oscillation frequencies (many modes, more than 1015) to determine the internal structure of the Sun, specifically: • density profiles • constraints on solar composition • the extension of the convective envelope ... The standard solar model (SSM) results from all these observations. Nuclear reactions in the Sun: Typically the reaction in the Sun are of the type: T1 + T2 ! T3 + T4 or T1 + T2 ! T3 + T4 + T5: (1) The temperature in the solar core is ∼ (10 -15)×106 eV corresponding to keV energies. The Coulomb barriers for nuclear reactions are however of ∼ MeV energies.
    [Show full text]
  • First Detection of Solar Neutrinos from CNO Cycle with Borexino
    First detection of solar neutrinos from the CNO cycle with Borexino Gioacchino Ranucci INFN - Milano On behalf of the Borexino Collaboration June 23, 2020 The Borexino detector @ Gran Sasso Active volume 280 tons of liquid scintillator Detection principle ν x + e →ν x + e Elastic scattering off the electrons of the scintillator threshold at ~ 60 keV (electron energy) 2020 Jun 23 G. Ranucci - First detection of solar neutrinos from CNO cycle with Borexino 2 Standard Solar Model : “engine” of the Sun, solar neutrinos production and spectrum predictions Develop ed by John Dominant Bahcall in for more massive than 40 stars years pp chain Latest SSM >99% of the energy in the Sun the remaining <1% in the Sun ? spectral prediction A. Serenelli EPJA, volume 5, Controversy about the surface id 78 (2016) metallicity composition of the N. Vinyoles et al. Sun: predictions differ up to 28% for the CNO ν flux using The Astrophysical lower (LZ) or higher Z (HZ) Journal, 835:202 models (16pp), 2017 2020 Jun 23 G. Ranucci - First detection of solar neutrinos from CNO cycle with Borexino 3 The Borexino quest for CNO neutrinos after the complete pp chain measurement CNO ν – pep ν– 210Bi correlations • Borexino data • CNO ν expected spectrum • 210Bi spectrum • pep ν spectrum The spectral fit returns only the sum of CNO and 210Bi, if both are left free Note also the low rates: Thanks to Borexino unprecedented purity 232 -19 238 -20 • R(CNO ν)expected ~ 3-5 cpd/100ton @ 95% C.L Th< 5.7 10 g/g U < 9.4 10 g/g • R(210Bi) ~ 10 cpd/100ton other backgrounds less relevant apart the • R(pep) ~ 2.5 cpd/100ton cosmogenic 11C The pep flux can be constrained at the 1.4 % level through the solar luminosity constraint coupled to SSM predictions on the pp to pep rate ratio and the most recent oscillation parameters - J.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Neutrinos: an Update
    Solar neutrinos: an update Stefano Davini, University of Houston on behalf of the Borexino Collaboration Heavy Quarks and Leptons 2014 Mainz, August 26, 2014 Nuclear reactions in the Sun Energy production in the Sun: pp chain pp chain→ 99% of energy production CNO cycle→ minor contribution CNO cycle Solar neutrinos Solar-ν flux and spectrum computed by Standard Solar Model pp pep pp ± 1% 7Be ± 7% Borexino → 5% pep ± 1.2% Borexino → 20% 8B ± 11% SNO, SuperK, KL, BX 7Be 8B E/MeV Detection of Solar neutrinos The sun produces only νe - Detection possible via 3 fundamental processes e νe Inverse β decay on proton or nucleus W ● Charged Current (CC) interaction N(A,Z+1) ● E MeV → νe only N(A,Z) Elastic scattering on nucleus νx νx ● Neutral Current (NC) interaction Z n ● neutrino not assorbed ● same cross section for ν , ν e μ,τ p d Elastic scattering on electron e- νe νe νe ● Charged Current + Neutral Current W Z ● different cross section for νe e νμ,τ + -44 2 νe e- .σ ~10 cm e- e- Short history of solar- (I) 70's-80's: Homestake (R. Davies) 37 37 - radiochemical experiment: νe+ Cl→ Ar + e (Eν >1.4 MeV) Deficit in rate → new physics or Solar Model unaccurate? Nobel prize 2002 Solar Model Final Result Short history of solar- (II) 90's: Gallex (GNO), Sage 71 71 - Radiochemical experiment: νe + Ga → Ge + e (Eν > 200 keV) Observed deficit on pp ν (low energy) Calibration with neutrino source → real effect Solar Model Short history of solar- (III) 80's-90's: (Super) KamioKande Confirm deficit on 8B ν (E> 5MeV) Direction of solar neutrinos A beautiful
    [Show full text]