DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecological Relationships

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecological Relationships Name: ____________________________ Ecological Relationships All organisms are connected to each other in an ecosystem. Organisms form relationships with each other because they are connected. Some organisms compete against other organisms for resources or space. Other organisms depend on each other to survive. These relationships are called ecological relationships. Ecological relationships exist because of niches.A niche is an organism’s role in an ecosystem.A niche includes the physical space an organism occupies and how that organism interacts with other organisms in that space.A niche is also determined by the place the organism has in the food chain. Only one species can occupy a specific niche in an ecosystem. This allows different species to live together. It also stabilizes ecosystems. The interaction between organisms in similar or overlapping niches results in an ecological relationship. There are five types of ecological relationships. Competition is the contest between organisms for food, space, mates and other resources. Predation is when one organism feeds on another organism. Commensalism, mutualism and parasitism are types of ecological relationships as well. These relationships are forms of symbiosis. Symbiosis is a close and long term interaction between organisms. Competition There are limited resources in an ecosystem. Individuals compete for these resources and for space. This is called competition. Individuals of the same species compete with each other. They compete for food, water, mates and territory. Different species compete with each other for resources and space as well. Often species compete to live in the same habitat.A habitat is the area that an organism lives. Sometimes one species may be eliminated from the habitat.A species may be eliminated if two species are competing to occupy the same niche. Ecology 44 © Stephanie Elkowitz Ecological Relationships Continued Predation Predation is an important relationship between organisms. One organism feeds on another organism. The organism that is eaten is called prey. The organism that is eating is called the predator. Often, the prey is the predator to a different organism and the predator is a different organism’s prey! The predator-prey relationship creates a cyclic change in populations. When predators eat prey, the prey population decreases. The decrease in food for the predator limits the predator population. Therefore the predator population decreases. You will study this ecological relationship further in another activity. Commensalism Commensalism is a form of symbiosis. It is a relationship between two organisms where one organism benefits from the relationship. The other organism does not benefit from the relationship but is not harmed by it either. The relationship between barnacles and whales is an example of commensalism. Barnacles become mobile by attaching to the whale. They also are protected from predators. The whale is neither helped nor harmed by the barnacles. Mutualism Mutualism is another form of symbiosis. In mutualism, both organisms benefit from the relationship. There are many examples of mutualism in an ecosystem.A well-known example is between a fungus and alga. Together, these species form lichen. The alga performs photosynthesis and produces food. The fungus feeds on the food. The fungus retains water, which protects the alga. Lichen can survive in harsh environments where fungus and alga could not survive on their own. Parasitism Parasitism is the third type of symbiosis. In parasitism, one organism benefits from the relationship. This organism is called the parasite. The other organism is harmed, but not always killed. This organism is called the host. Ticks, fleas and intestinal worms are examples of parasites. Very often, the parasite does not kill the host. The parasite relies on the host and if the host dies, the parasite often dies as well. Many human diseases are caused by parasites. If the parasite grows large or overpopulates the human body, it will cause severe illness or death. Ecology 45 © Stephanie Elkowitz Name: ________________________ Predator-Prey Graphing Activity In this activity, you will study the predator-prey relationship between moose and wolves on the Isle Royale in Michigan. These organisms are isolated on a small island. There is little migration of animals in or out of the island. Furthermore, the wolves are the only predators of the moose and the moose are almost exclusively the prey for the wolves. These features create a unique example of predation. Many scientists study the Isle Royale moose and wolves since very few variables influence their relationship. Directions: Read the background information. Then graph the data. Answer the summary questions using data from the graph and information from the reading. Background Information Isle Royale is a small, forested island in the middle of Lake Superior in Michigan. The island is protected by national park status. Hunting and other human activities are prohibited on the island. The island was isolated until the early 1900s. Moose swam across Lake Superior from Minnesota to the island. There were no natural predators to the moose on the island. The forest service was concerned that without predators, the moose could overpopulate and consume all the resources on the island. The island flourished with vegetation, but every ecosystem food supply is limited. They feared overpopulation could cause overgrazing and then mass starvation of the moose. The moose population grew relatively unchecked until 1949, when a single breeding pair of wolves crossed an ice bridge from Ontario, Canada to the island. Scientists believed the wolves would populate the island and control the moose population. They would feed on the moose and prevent the moose population from becoming too large. Furthermore, the forest service believed the wolves would improve the overall health and quality of the moose herd. The predators would eliminate weaker members of the herd. Only strong individuals would survive, reproduce and pass their traits on to offspring. Scientists monitored the moose and wolf interactions. They kept track of changes in their population size. The table on the following page shows changes in the moose and wolf population from 1960 to 2010. *Background information and data from: http://www.isleroyalewolf.org Ecology 46 © Stephanie Elkowitz Predator-Prey Graphing Activity The table below shows the moose and wolf population on Isle Royale from 1960 to 2010. Use data in the table to create a graph. Use the guidelines below to help you. After you complete the graph, answer the summary questions. Isle Royale Moose and Wolf Population (1960-2010) YEAR # Moose # Wolves 1960 500 20 1965 750 28 1970 1500 17 1975 1200 42 1980 800 50 1981* 800 14 1985 1200 24 1990 1300 14 1995 2300 16 1996** 500 22 2000 800 28 2005 500 15 2010 700 20 You will create a line graph. Use the guidelines below to help you create the graph. • Use the left axis to help you plot the wolf population. • Use the right axis to help you plot the moose population. • Plot the points for wolf population size with an open circle or colored pencil. • Plot the points for moose population size with a closed circle or colored pencil. • Create a key to show which symbol or color you used for each population. Notes: *In 1981, humans accidentally introduced a canine virus that killed many wolves. **In 1996, there was an outbreak of moose ticks. Additionally, the winter was harsh and there was increased competition for food among the moose. Ecology 47 © Stephanie Elkowitz Wolf Population Size 20 30 40 50 10 0 1960 1965 1980 1970 Isle Royale Moose and Wolf Population (1960- Population Wolf and Moose Royale Isle 1975 YEAR 1985 1990 1995 2010) 2010) 2000 2005 2010 © Stephanie Elkowitz 2000 2500 1000 1500 0 500 Ke Size Population Moose y Predator-Prey Graphing Activity Summary Questions 1. The moose population increases from 1960 to 1970. What happens to the wolf population as a result of this increase in moose? __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 2. The wolf population increases from 1970 to 1980. What happens to the moose population as a result of this increase in wolves? __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 3. In 1981, humans accidentally introduced a canine virus to the wolf population. How did this affect the wolf population? How did it affect the moose? __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 4. In 1996, there was an outbreak of moose ticks. The winter was especially harsh and food was scarce for the moose. How did this affect the moose population? How did it affect the wolves? __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ 5. What do you think would have happened if wolves had not been introduced to Isle Royale? __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________ Ecology 49 © Stephanie Elkowitz.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant-Microbe Symbioses: a Continuum from Commensalism to Parasitism
    UCLA UCLA Previously Published Works Title Plant-microbe symbioses: A continuum from commensalism to parasitism Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6kx779h1 Journal Symbiosis, 37(1-3) ISSN 0334-5114 Author Hirsch, Ann M. Publication Date 2004 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Symbiosis, 37 (2004) xx–xx 1 Balaban, Philadelphia/Rehovot Review article. Plant-Microbe Symbioses: A Continuum from Commensalism to Parasitism ANN M. HIRSCH Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA, Tel. +1-310-206-8673, Fax. +1-310-206-5413, Email. [email protected] Received October 28, 2003; Accepted January 27, 2004 Abstract Photosynthetic organisms establish symbioses with a wide range of microorganisms. This review examines the diversity of symbiotic interactions, and proposes that there is a continuum from commensalism to mutualism to pathogenesis/parasitism in plant-microbe associations. The advantage of considering commensalism, mutualism, and pathogenesis/parasitism as a continuum rather than as discrete relationships between hosts and microbes, as they have been considered in the past, is that it will motivate us to focus more on common molecular mechanisms. Keywords: ?? 1. Introduction Plants establish mutualistic, often described as symbiotic, interactions with myriad organisms, both prokaryotic and eukaryotic. Some of the most prominent photosynthetic mutualisms are illustrated in Fig. 1. Although technically not a plant symbiosis, lichens are photosynthetic and represent an excellent example of a beneficial interaction (Fig. 1A). Presented at the 4th International Symbiosis Congress, August 17–23, 2003, Halifax, Canada 0334-5114/2004/$05.50 ©2004 Balaban 2 A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Coming to Terms with a Field: Words and Concepts in Symbiosis
    Symbiosis, 14 (1992) 17-31 17 Balaban, Philadelphia/Rehovot Review article Coming to Terms with a Field: Words and Concepts in Symbiosis MARY BETH SAFFO Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA Tel. ( 408) 459 4997, Fax ( 408) 459 4882 Received March 29, 1992; Accepted May 5, 1992 Abstract More than a century after de Bary (1879) adopted the term symbiosis, biolo• gists still disagree about the word's meaning. Many researchers define symbiosis in the sense of de Bary, as an intimate, outcome-independent interaction between species; others use symbiosis as a synonym for mutualistic or non-parasitic as• sociations. This varied usage arises in part from the absence of a language for describing both symbiotic and non-symbiotic mutualistic interactions; the complexity of many "mutualistic" endosymbiosesposes a particular descriptive difficulty. Expropriation of "symbiosis" to identify these mutualistic associa• tions is an understandable, but ultimately confusing, and conceptually limiting solution to this problem. Retention of the broad, outcome-independent sense of symbiosis is urged. Alternate terms, including chronic endosymbiosis, are proposed for apparently benign symbioses which are too poorly known, or too complex, to categorize comfortably as "mutualistic." In addition to outcome-independent investigations of symbiotic phenomena, questions of the evolutionary significance of symbioses are difficult, but im• portant problems. Thus, terms which address particular outcomes for host or symbiont - e.g., parasitism, commensalism and mutualism, "costs," "bene• fits," fitness, and related terms - also have a place in the language of symbiosis research. 0334-5114/92 /$03.50 ©1992 Balaban 18 M.B. SAFFO Habits of language ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Symbiotic Life of Symbiodinium in the Open Ocean Within a New Species of Calcifying Ciliate (Tiarina Sp.)
    The ISME Journal (2016) 10, 1424–1436 © 2016 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/16 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE The symbiotic life of Symbiodinium in the open ocean within a new species of calcifying ciliate (Tiarina sp.) Solenn Mordret1,2,5, Sarah Romac1,2, Nicolas Henry1,2, Sébastien Colin1,2, Margaux Carmichael1,2, Cédric Berney1,2, Stéphane Audic1,2, Daniel J Richter1,2, Xavier Pochon3,4, Colomban de Vargas1,2 and Johan Decelle1,2,6 1EPEP—Evolution des Protistes et des Ecosystèmes Pélagiques—team, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Roscoff, France; 2CNRS, UMR 7144, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Roscoff, France; 3Coastal and Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand and 4Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Symbiotic partnerships between heterotrophic hosts and intracellular microalgae are common in tropical and subtropical oligotrophic waters of benthic and pelagic marine habitats. The iconic example is the photosynthetic dinoflagellate genus Symbiodinium that establishes mutualistic symbioses with a wide diversity of benthic hosts, sustaining highly biodiverse reef ecosystems worldwide. Paradoxically, although various species of photosynthetic dinoflagellates are prevalent eukaryotic symbionts in pelagic waters, Symbiodinium has not yet been reported in symbiosis within oceanic plankton, despite its high propensity for the symbiotic lifestyle. Here we report a new pelagic photosymbiosis between a calcifying ciliate host and the microalga Symbiodinium in surface ocean waters. Confocal and scanning electron microscopy, together with an 18S rDNA-based phylogeny, showed that the host is a new ciliate species closely related to Tiarina fusus (Colepidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Symbiosis: Living Together
    Biology Symbiosis: Living together When different species live together in close contact, they can interact with each other in a number of different ways. In this lesson you will investigate the following: • What are the types of symbiosis? • What is parasitism? • What are the different types of parasite-host relationships? • What’s it like to be a parasite? So let’s get stuck in and start sucking the life out of this lesson! This is a print version of an interactive online lesson. To sign up for the real thing or for curriculum details about the lesson go to www.cosmosforschools.com Introduction: Symbiosis (P1) Cuckoos are known for not building their own nests. Instead these birds let someone else do all the work to build a nest, then lay their eggs there. They don’t even wait around to bring up their chicks when they hatch – they let the other birds do that too. Scientists have just discovered how they have been getting away with this for so long. While having an extra mouth to feed is a burden, it seems the cuckoos do provide something useful in exchange. While studying crows’ breeding habits in Spain, scientists saw lots of cuckoos laying eggs in crows’ nests and magpies’ nests. The magpies fought back and threw out the cuckoo eggs (if they noticed them). But the crows allowed the eggs to stay, letting them hatch and then feeding the cuckoo chicks as they grew. Curious, the scientists investigated, taking note of how well the crows with cuckoos did compared to crows without a cuckoo tenant.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbiotic Relationship in Which One Organism Benefits and the Other Is Unaffected
    Ecology Quiz Review – ANSWERS! 1. Commensalism – symbiotic relationship in which one organism benefits and the other is unaffected. Mutualism – symbiotic relationship in which both organisms benefit. Parasitism – symbiotic relationship in which one organism benefits and the other is harmed or killed. Predation – a biological interaction where a predator feeds on a prey. 2A. Commensalism B. Mutualism C. Parasitism D. Predation 3. Autotrophic organisms produce their own food by way of photosynthesis. They are also at the base of a food chain or trophic pyramid. 4. Answer will vary – You will need two plants, two herbivores, and two carnivores 5. Decreases. Only 10% of the energy available at one level is passed to the next level. 6. If 10,000 units of energy are available to the grass at the bottom of the food chain, only 1000 units of energy will be available to the primary consumer, and only 100 units will be available to the secondary consumer. 7. Population is the number of a specific species living in an area. 8. B – All members of the Turdis migratorius species. 9. The number of secondary consumers would increase. 10. The energy decreases as you move up the pyramid which is indicated by the pyramid becoming smaller near the top. 11. Second highest-level consumer would increase. 12. Primary consumer would decrease due to higher numbers of secondary consumer. 13. The number of organisms would decrease due to the lack of food for primary consumers. Other consumers would decrease as the numbers of their food source declined. 14. Number of highest-level consumers would decrease due to lack of food.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptations for Survival: Symbioses, Camouflage
    Adaptations for Survival: Symbioses, Camouflage & Mimicry OCN 201 Biology Lecture 11 http://www.oceanfootage.com/stockfootage/Cleaning_Station_Fish/ http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2005/03/24_octopus.shtml Symbiosis • Parasitism - negative effect on host • Commensalism - no effect on host • Mutualism - both parties benefit Often involves food but benefits may also include protection from predators, dispersal, or habitat Parasites Leeches (Segmented Worms) Tongue Louse (Crustacean) Nematodes (Roundworms) Whale Barnacles & Lice Commensalism or Parasitism? Commensalism or Mutualism? http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ http://www.scuba-equipment-usa.com/marine/APR04/ Mutualism Cleaner Shrimp http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ Anemone Hermit Crab http://www.scuba-equipment-usa.com/marine/APR04/ Camouflage Countershading Sharks Birds Countershading coloration of the Caribbean reef shark © George Ryschkewitsch Fish JONATHAN CHESTER Mammals shiftingbaselines.org/blog/big_tuna.jpg http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/images/cetaceans/orca_spyhopping-noaa.jpg Adaptive Camouflage Camouflage http://www.cspangler.com/images/photos/aquarium/weedy-sea-dragon2.jpg Camouflage by Mimicry Mimicry • Batesian: an edible species evolves to look similar to an inedible species to avoid predation • Mullerian: two or more inedible species all evolve to look similar maximizing efficiency with which predators learn to avoid them Batesian Mimicry An edible species evolves to resemble an inedible species to avoid predators Pufferfish (poisonous) Filefish (non-poisonous)
    [Show full text]
  • Bio112 Home Work Community Structure
    Name: Date: Bio112 Home Work Community Structure Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. ____ 1. All of the populations of different species that occupy and are adapted to a given habitat are referred to by which term? a. biosphere b. community c. ecosystem d. niche e. ecotone ____ 2. Niche refers to the a. home range of an animal. b. preferred habitat for an organism. c. functional role of a species in a community. d. territory occupied by a species. e. locale in which a species lives. ____ 3. A relationship in which benefits flow both ways between the interacting species is a. a neutral relationship. b. commensalism. c. competitive exclusion. d. mutualism. e. parasitism. ____ 4. A one-way relationship in which one species benefits and directly hurts the other is called a. commensalism. b. competitive exclusion. c. parasitism. d. obligate mutualism. e. neutral relationship. ____ 5. The interaction in which one species benefits and the second species is neither harmed nor benefited is a. mutualism. b. parasitism. c. commensalism. d. competition. e. predation. ____ 6. The interaction between two species in which one species benefits and the other species is harmed is a. mutualism. b. commensalism. c. competition. d. predation. e. none of these ____ 7. The relationship between the yucca plant and the yucca moth that pollinates it is best described as a. camouflage. b. commensalism. c. competitive exclusion. d. mutualism. e. all of these Name: Date: ____ 8. Competitive exclusion is the result of a. mutualism. b. commensalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbiosis in the Microbial World: from Ecology to Genome Evolution Jean-Baptiste Raina1,*, Laura Eme2, F
    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Biology Open (2018) 7, bio032524. doi:10.1242/bio.032524 REVIEW Symbiosis in the microbial world: from ecology to genome evolution Jean-Baptiste Raina1,*, Laura Eme2, F. Joseph Pollock3, Anja Spang2,4, John M. Archibald5 and Tom A. Williams6,* ABSTRACT functionally diverse organisms on the planet, the microbes The concept of symbiosis – defined in 1879 by de Bary as ‘the living (which comprise bacteria, archaea and protists, as well as the together of unlike organisms’–has a rich and convoluted history in viruses that infect them), and their interactions with multicellular biology. In part, because it questioned the concept of the individual, hosts. These microbial symbioses range from metabolic symbiosis fell largely outside mainstream science and has (McCutcheon and Moran, 2012) and defensive interactions traditionally received less attention than other research disciplines. (Oliver et al., 2014) among free-living organisms, to the This is gradually changing. In nature organisms do not live in isolation complete cellular and genomic integration that occurred during but rather interact with, and are impacted by, diverse beings the endosymbiotic origins of mitochondria and chloroplasts in throughout their life histories. Symbiosis is now recognized as a eukaryotic cells (Embley and Martin, 2006; Roger et al., 2017). central driver of evolution across the entire tree of life, including, for Symbiosis provides an unparalleled route to evolutionary example, bacterial endosymbionts that provide insects with vital innovation, one that underlies some of the most important nutrients and the mitochondria that power our own cells. Symbioses transitions in the history of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Commensalism, Parasitism, & Mutualism
    69 Symbiosis in the Glades (Commensalism, Parasitism, Mutualism) OVERVIEW: Mutualism, parasitism, and commensalism all describe relationships in various ways that benefits an organism, harms an organism or neither harms nor helps an organism. In the cedar glade, we’ll look at a few examples. GRADE LEVEL: 6 – 12 TIME: One or two 50-minute class periods depending on student input and/or extension SETTING: Classroom OBJECTIVES: Student will describe the difference between mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism. These terms will be illustrated by using some examples that may be found in cedar glades of Middle Tennessee. LEARNING STANDARDS CORRELATED: Science GLE 0607.2.1; CLE 3210.2.1; 3255.3.6 QUESTION: What biological relationships exist among unlike organisms in the cedar glade? MATERIALS: 1 Cedar Glade Species List per student of student research team Additional field guides of resource books BACKGROUND: The cedar glade is no different from any other habitat in regard to complex biological relationships. One example of mutualism in the glade includes lichens. Lichens in this area often appear as the greenish-gray flaky crust you may see on tree bark or on rocks or as clumps of greenish-gray mass we often erroneously refer to as “reindeer moss.” This “reindeer moss” is very soft after rain or heavy dew has fallen. The lichen becomes dry and brittle during dry weather. The reason why lichens are considered to have a mutualistic relationship is because the mass that we see is a combination of an algae and a fungus. The fungus obtains food from photosynthesis from the algae and the algae in turn, has a place to live because of the fungus.
    [Show full text]
  • Answers --Chapter 6 Preparing for the Ap Exam Multiple Choice Questions 1
    ANSWERS --CHAPTER 6 PREPARING FOR THE AP EXAM MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS 1. Which of the following is not an example of a density-independent factor? (a) Drought (b) Competition (c) Forest fire (d) Hurricane (e) Flood 2. As the size of a white-tailed deer population increases, (a) the carrying capacity of the environment for white-tailed deer will be reduced. (b) a volcanic eruption will have a greater proportional effect than it would on a smaller population. (c) the effect of limiting resources will decrease. (d) the number of gray wolves, a natural predator of white-tailed deer, will increase. (e) white-tailed deer are more likely to become extinct. 3. The graph on page 174 of the population growth of Canada geese in Ohio between 1955 and 2002 can best be described as (a) an exponential growth curve. (b) a logistic growth curve. (c) a stochastic growth curve. (d) oscillation between overshoot and die-off. (e) approaching the carrying capacity. 4. Which of the following is not a statement of the logistic growth model? (a) Population growth is limited by density-dependent factors. (b) A population will initially increase exponentially and then level off as it approaches the carrying capacity of the environment. (c) Future population growth cannot be predicted mathematically. (d) Population growth slows as the number of individuals approaches the carrying capacity. (c) A graph of population growth produces an S-shaped growth curve over time. 5. Which of the following characteristics are typical of r-selected species? I They produce many offspring in a short period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Simply Symbiosis! Symbiotic Relationships
    (circle) Name: _______________________________________ Period : 1 4 5 6 7 Simply Symbiosis! Background The word symbiosis was first defined as “unlike organisms living together”. The relationship between these two unlike organisms can be positive, negative or neutral. There are three types of symbiotic relationships- mutualism, commensalism and parasitism. Mutualism is when both organisms benefit from each other like the African crocodile and the blackbird plover- the bird gets nutrients from left over food material in the mouth of the crocodile and the crocodile has cleaner teeth because of the bird. Commensalism is when one organism benefits from the relationship, while the other one is neither helped nor harmed. An example of commensalism is a barnacle on a whale. The barnacle gets protection and transportation to different food sources while the whale is neither helped nor harmed by the presence of the barnacle. The last example of symbiosis is parasitism. This is when one organism benefits but while doing so it is harming the other member in the relationship. A common example of this is a flea on a dog. The flea obtains nutrients and protection from the dog but the dog has an uncomfortable skin reaction because of the flea. Pre Lab Assignment Complete the concept map about symbiotic relationships using the word bank below. One benefits/One is harmed Both benefit Parasitism One benefits/One not helped nor harmed Mutualism Commensalism Symbiotic Relationships Skills Applications Concepts pg. 1 Lab Assignment Read and complete each step of the lab below. 1. Purpose: The purpose of this lab is to determine the type of symbiotic relationships between two unlike organisms found in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Engage: Biological Relationship Tic-Tac-Toe
    Lesson 9 Biology Engage: Biological Relationship Tic-Tac-Toe Host Mutualism Prey Competition Parasitism Predation Commensalism Predator Symbiosis ______________________________________________________________________ Symbiosis Commensalism Prey Parasitism Host Competition Predation Mutualism Predator © 2013 Region 4 Education Service Center STAAR™ Achievement Series for Science Lesson 9 Biology Engage: Biological Relationship Tic-Tac-Toe Predation Symbiosis Predator Parasitism Competition Host Prey Mutualism Commensalism Prey Commensalism Symbiosis Competition Mutualism Predation Parasitism Predator Host STAAR™ Achievement Series for Science © 2013 Region 4 Education Service Center Lesson 9 Biology Explore: Predator-Prey Simulation Organism Yarn Color Food Source cricket green grass (popcorn) frog yellow crickets hawk red frogs fox brown frogs Trial Time of Trial Animal with Animal with Greatest Survival Least Survival 1 Equal distribution 2 Population change: Increase the number of frogs 3 Population change: Decrease the number of frogs and increase the number of crickets 4 Population change: Increase the number of hawks and decrease the number of frogs Questions 1. What animal(s) did you play? Describe what you did as the animal(s) to increase your chance of survival. 2. What happened when the population changed and there were more frogs in the ecosystem? 3. What happened when the population changed and there were fewer frogs in the ecosystem? 4. What occurred when the population changed, the hawk population increased, and the number of frogs decreased? 5. What if you survived but were not able to get five pieces of popcorn? How does this translate to what actually happens within an ecosystem? © 2013 Region 4 Education Service Center STAAR™ Achievement Series for Science Lesson 9 Biology Explain Part 1: Predator-Prey Relationships Identify the role and the relationship between the organisms in the Explore activity using the appropriate vocabulary words from the Engage activity.
    [Show full text]