ECONOMICS of OUT- and Nat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ECONOMICS of OUT- and Nat DOCUMENT RESUME ED 058 998 RC 005 937 TITLE RecreationSymposiumProceedings. The Forest RecreationSymposium(State University of NewYork College of Forestry, Syracuse,12-14 October 1971). Darby, Pa. Northeastern INSTITUTION Forest Service (DOA), Upper Forest ExperimentStation.; State Univ. of NewYork, Syracuse. Coll. of Forestry. PUB DATE 71 NOTE 217p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$9.87 Development; Management; DESCRIPTORS Athletic Activities; Personality Studies; *Planning;*Program Development; *Recreation; RecreationalActivities; Recreationists; *Research Needs; Resources;*Symposia ABSTRACT In this collectionof 26 papers presented atthe 1971 information is Forest RecreationSymposiumheld at Syracuse, N.Y., presented about the forest resourceand forest recreationresearch. of the planner and the The symposium, designedto help meet the needs manager in bothpublic and private areas of the forest recreation resource, covered 5general areas:(1) Planning andDeveloping the Recreation Resource,(2) Managing theRecreation Resource, (3) Characterizing the RecreationUser,(4) Specific Managerial Considerations Related to UserCharacteristics, and (5) A Lookat the Research Task Ahead. Amongthespecific topicscovered were the recreation-resource inventory process,predicting values of design of facilities,economicsof recreation participation, analysis recreation development andprivate-recreation enterprises, ranking systems, multiple usefor recreation of environmental-quality of recreation in the East, law enforcement,and carrying capacity areas. Includedare 337references. (MJB) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO- DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG- INATING IT. POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN- IONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDU- CATION POSITION OR POLICY. 15 P 11U 44. CEE INGS tel ..7),". vf viemplit a. Planned and Presented by: " -a. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Xlr 11111.91116._- Forest Service and State University of New York 1 4 College of Forestry vr 2c, in Conjunction with The Pinchot Institute for trt Environmental Forestry Research: Consortium for Environmental - Forestry Studies 4 Air 4 t, 4 . 4,14. II 14 NORTHEASTERN FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION FOREST SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OFAGRICULTURE UPPER DARBY, PA. 1971 . WARREN T. DOOLITTLE, DIRECTOR THE FOREST .6 RECREATION SYMPOSIUM Held at State University of New York Collegeof Forestry, Syracuse, New York 12-14 October 1971 SPONSORED BY State University of New York College of Forestry USDA Forest Service: Northeastern Forest Experiment Station Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry National Recreation and Park Association New York State Office of Parks and Recreation New York State Department of EnvironmentalConservation PLANNED AND ORGANIZED BY General chairmen: W. T. Doolittle and R. E. Getty Program: E. L. Shafer, G. H. Moeller, H. E. Echelberger,D. Morrison, and W. F. La Page Local arrangements: A. Hamer and H. E. Echelberger. Publicity: H. Marx, R. Cochran, and R. F. Johnson Editor: E. vH. Larson Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 1971. Recreation Symposium ProcPedings. 211 pp.USDA NE. Forest Exp. Sta., Upper Darby, Pa. A collection of 26 papers presented at the RecreationSymposium held in October 1971 at Syracuse, N.Y., bringing together present knowledge about the forest recreation resource and forest recreation research. The Symposium was designed to help meet the needsof the planner and the manager in both public and private areasof the forest recreation resource. 907.2 2 FOREWORD FOREST RECREATION RESOURCE planncrs and managcrs arc busy people. The surge in demand for recreation in recent years, including all kinds of leisure-time activitics, has all but overwhelmed thc pcoplc who mast allocatc thc ncccssary funds and rcsourccs, design anddevclop thc appro- priate equipment and facilities, and maintain and manage the recreation re- source. This Symposium was designed to hclp mcctthese needs of thc planncr and managcr in both thc public and private arcas of thc forest-recreation community. Ovcr the last scvcral dccadcs, forest-recreation rcscarch rcsults have appcarcd in all typcs of publications from one-pagc how-to-do-it pamphlets to volumi- nous works on thcorctical approaches for an arrayof rccrcation-managcmcnt problems. Thc decision-maker nccds considerable timc and money to scarch through this litcraturc before hc finds an answcr to his particular problem. The papers that appcar in thcsc Proceedings wcrc prcparcd in attempts to consolidate and synthesize past rcscarch efforts over a widc rangc of recreation subject-matter areas. At thc samc timc, cach paper includcs a wealth of refer- ence material that should be hclpful to anyoncwho wishcs to pursuc a givcn subject in morc dcpth. But, most important, the authors havc written thcir papers so that planncrs and managcrs can undcrstandthe important aspccts of cach subject without having to fight thcir way through complicatedformulas, thcorctical conccpts, or dctailcd explanations. Whcrcvcr feasible, the authors havc simplificd the so-callcd complicated aspccts of spccific conccpts by pro- viding practical cxamplcs of how thc planning and managing thcory works, or does not work, for variouslevels of recreation activities and rcsourcc conditions. When this Symposium was bcing developed, almost a ycar and a half ago, many of thc researchers who wcrc asked toparticipatc rcmarkcd that if wc waited a fcw more ycars they would have morc rcscarch results to rcinforcc or cxpand thcir present data. Such is thc lamentof cvcry rcscarchcr. Forest- recreation planncrs and managcrs cannot wait a "few morc years"; thcy want answcrs now, even though the answers may be subject to accrtain degree of crror. To paraphrasc an old saying, "It is bcttcr to havc had afcw answcrs to improve thc dccision-making proccss than ncvcr to havc had any answcrs at all.' So we hopc that thc information prcscntcd hcrc, although far from perfect, will rcsult in better forest-recreation decision-making. And if that is thc cnd rcsult, our ultimate objective for conducting thc Symposium will have been accomplished. Furthermore, we hope this Sym- posium will scrvc as a catalyst for futurc sunimarizations of rccrcation research rcsults for planning and managing purposcs. W. T. DOOLITTLE and R. E. GETTY 3 CONTENTS Planning and Developing the Recreation Resource TIIE RECREATION-RESOURCE INVENTORY PROC- ESS FOR STATE AND REGIONAL PLANS: Hugh C. Davis PREDICTING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE VALUES OF RECREATION PARTICIPATION: Elwood L. Shafer and George H. Moeller 5 DESIGN AND LAYOUT OF RECREATION FACILITIES: Howard Orr 23 THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATION DEVEL- OPMENT: A SYNOPSIS: Wendell G. Beardsley 28 PRIVATE RECREATION ENTERPRISE ECONOMICS: Malcolm I. Beyins 33 AN ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTALQUALITY RANKING SYSTEMS: Julius Fabos 40 Managing the Recreation Resource PRESERVING NATURE IN FORESTED WILDERNESS AREAS AND NATIONAL PARKS: Miron L. Heinselnian 57 UNDERSTANDING THE VISUAL RESOURCE: Floyd Newby 68 EXTERNAL BENEFITS OF NATURAL ENVIRON- MENTS: Larry W. Tombaugh 73 INVENTORYING RECREATION USE: George A. James78 MULTIPLE USE MANAGEMENT FOR RECREATION IN THE EAST: Robert L. Prausa 96 Characterizing the Recreation User THE CAMPER: Gerald L. Cole and Bruce T. Wilkins 105 HIKERS AND OTHER TRAIL USERS: Robert C. Lucas 113 MEMBERSHIP IN CONSERVATION GROUPS AND OUTDOOR CLUBS: John C. Hendee 123 HUNTER-F1SHERMEN CHARACTERISTICS: FACTORS IN WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AND POLICY DECI- SIONS: Robert S. Bond and James C. Whittaker 128 THE SKIER: HIS CHARACTERISTICS AND PREFER- ENCES: William A. Leuschner and Roscoe B. Herrington135 THE SNOWMOBILE: John W. Hetherington 143 Specific Managerial Considerations Related to User Characteristics UNDESIRABLE BEHAVIOR IN FOREST CAMP- GROUNDS: Roger N. Clark 150 PERSPECTIVES ON LAW ENFORCEMENT IN REC- REATION AREAS: Lawrence C. Hadley 156 COMMUNICATING WITH RECREATION VISITORS: J. Alan Wagar 161 FACILITY REHABILITATION: Edwin H. Ketchledge 166 CARRYING CAPACITY: MAINTAINING OUTDOOR RECREATION QUALITY: David W. Lime andGeorge H. Stankey 174 A Look at the Research Task Ahead CULTURAL "FOGWEED" AND OUTDOOR RECREA- TION RESEARCH: Wilbur F. La Page 186 AN OPINION ON THE FUTURE OF FOREST REC- REATION RESEARCH: John F. Hamilton 194 EXPANDING AND STRENGTHENING OUTDOOR RECREATION RESEARCH: Walter S. Hopkins 197 -THE CHALLENGE OF RECREATION PLANNING: METHODOLOGY AND FACTORS TO CONSIDER: Ronald Uleck 200 . Planning & Developingthe Recreation Resource THE RECREATION-RESOURCE INVENTORY PROCESS FORSTATE AND REGIONAL PLANS by HUGH C. DAVIS, Associate Professorof Resource Planning, Department of Landscape Architecture,University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass. ABSTRACT. The establishment of guidelines foridentifying recrea- tion resources in the inventorying processshould be limitea to conditions and characteristics of the natural resourcesthemselves. This requires not only that we define recreation,but also that we prescribe the combination of resources necessary to carryon a variety of recreational activities. THIS PAPER dealswith conceptscan be collated withthe specific sites iden- rather than techniques. The traditional tified. Coupled with on-site investigations, approach to the topic is how to makea strong economic,social, and physical an inventory of recreation resources.Thiscase can be presentedfor the desirability has been discussed in several governmentof one site over another. publications and new approaches have been But what are
Recommended publications
  • Alternatives Considered
    Forest-wide NNIS Management Project Chapter 2 – Alternatives Considered Chapter 2 – Alternatives Considered This chapter: Describes the alternatives that were considered to address issues and concerns; Identifies the design features and mitigation measures that would be implemented to reduce the chance of adverse resource effects; and Summarizes the activities and effects of the alternatives in comparative form to clearly display the differences between each alternative and to provide a clear basis for choice among options by the decision maker and the public. 2.1 - Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study During initial planning and scoping, several potential alternatives to the proposed action were suggested. The following is a summary of the alternatives that contributed to the overall range of alternatives considered, but, for the reasons noted here, were eliminated from detailed study. 2.1.1 - Control NNIS on Private Land Not Adjacent to National Forest Land Several people expressed interest in collaborating with the Forest to control NNIS on private property that is not adjacent to National Forest land. While such collaboration may be desirable for reducing local NNIS populations, the proper vehicle for such collaboration is a Cooperative Weed Management Area (CWMA) involving landowners, the Forest Service, and other state, federal, and local agencies. The purpose and need focuses on authorizing treatment of infestations; collaborating to achieve control on a broader scale can be pursued independent of this project as staff and funding allow. Elimination of this concept as an alternative does not preclude the Forest from collaborating with the owners of land that is adjacent to treatment sites on National Forest land.
    [Show full text]
  • September 18,2008 This Letter Is to Give You Arguments As to Why I Am
    September 18,2008 This letter is to give you arguments as to why I am opposed to PATH, the 1% c9 line proposal to go through the North Fork Valley in West Virginia. -vz~a 2- 0 ac?) I was born and raised in Virginia. In 1990 my husband and I found a beautiR1 pie% op property in Grant Co. West Virginia, only two and a half hours &om om home in Manassas, Va. The land was pasture land with no water or electricity. We built a humble cabin to live in when we visited our land, usually on weekends. We found our visits were steadily increasing and in 2001 we had a 3 bedroom house built. In 2005, tired of the traffic and the rat race of Northern Virginia, on a leap of faith we retired from good paying government jobs and moved to our WV home. We wanted to share the beauty of this land which led us to our decision to add on and Breakfast. In January of 2006 we opened Breath o In our guestbook are many happy notes from people who have stayed at our Bed and Breakfast and who have hked the nearby North Mountain.. “. .. we enjoyed everythlng... touring Smoke Hole Canyon, hiking Seneca Rocks and Dolly Sods, and “duckying” on the Potomac.. ” Ths family of four also had hked North Fork Mountain which challenged us along with our grandchildren on the same hike this past July. These notes include people from Norway, Great Britain, Australia, and one from France who wrote in her best English, “This beautiful landscape you have chance to live here.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • Grant County Plan PC 12-5-13
    Grant County Plan Developed by the Grant County Planning Commission with the assistance of Aaron Costenbader, Kathryn Ferreitra, & Vishesh Maskey Under the direction of Michael John Dougherty, Extension Specialist & Professor Adopted March 2011 Revised July 2013 Grant County Plan Developed by the Grant County Planning Commission with the assistance of Aaron Costenbader, Kathryn Ferreitra, & Vishesh Maskey Under the direction of Michael John Dougherty, Extension Specialist & Professor Adopted March 2011 Revised July 2013 West Virginia University Extension Service Community Resources and Economic Development 2104 Agricultural Sciences Building PO Box 6108 Morgantown, WV 26506-6108 304-293-2559 (Voice) 304-293-6954 (Fax) [email protected] GRANT COUNTY PLAN Page I Grant County Plan Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Plan Background ............................................................................................................................. 2 Planning Process ............................................................................................................................. 4 County Profile .............................................................................................................................. 5 Table 1: Historical Population ....................................................................................................... 5 Table 2: Comparative Population
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Lidar to 3D Structural Mapping
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2019 Application of Lidar to 3D Structural Mapping Bertrand Gaschot West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Gaschot, Bertrand, "Application of Lidar to 3D Structural Mapping" (2019). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4111. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4111 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Application of Lidar to 3D Structural Mapping Bertrand Gaschot Thesis submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in GEOLOGY Jaime Toro, Ph.D., Chair Dengliang Gao, Ph.D. Aaron Maxwell, Ph.D. Department of Geology and Geography Morgantown, West Virginia 2018 Keywords: Lidar, Smoke Hole Canyon, Structure, 3D Mapping, Kinematic Modeling Copyright 2019 Bertrand Gaschot ABSTRACT Application of Lidar to 3D Structural Mapping Bertrand Gaschot The rugged, densely forested terrain of the West Virginia Appalachian Valley and Ridge Province has made it difficult for field-based studies to agree on the structure of the highly deformed Silurian-Devonian cover strata.
    [Show full text]
  • The Highlands Voice February, 2017 Page 1 West Virginia Highlands Conservancy Non-Profit Org
    The Highlands Voice February, 2017 Page 1 West Virginia Highlands Conservancy Non-Profit Org. PO. Box 306 U.S. Postage PAID Charleston, WV 25321 Permit No. 2831 Charleston, WV The Highlands Voice The Monthly Publication of the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy Volume 50 No. `2 February, 2017 Whoa, hold your horses FERC, Dominion Seek to By John McFerrin Rush Pipeline Review The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and anticipated a big pipeline running through the Forest. Because of Dominion Resources have proposed an accelerated schedule this, it would be illegal to allow a pipeline to cross the Forests unless for approval of the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline. The Forest those plans are changed. Service has pushed back against that proposal, suggesting a more As a matter of law, neither a change in the Land and Resource thorough review. Management Plan nor issuance of a special use permit can come Dominion’s proposed 600-mile Atlantic Coast Pipeline about before the Forest Service has all the relevant information and would cross 21 miles of the George Washington and Monongahela follows its procedures. National Forests. In order to build the pipeline, Dominion must have So far, the Forest Service has not shown any hostility to approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). the proposed pipeline. Neither has it shown any great fondness. It must also have the approval of the U.S. Forest Service. Instead, it has consistently shown its commitment to a careful and The Forest Service approval would come in the form of a thorough analysis of the pipeline, requiring the applicant to provide Special Use permit that would allow the construction of the pipeline complete and high quality information and making decisions based on the National Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • North Fork Mountain and Thorn Creek CFA Action Plan
    Action Plan for the North Fork Mountain & Thorn Creek Conservation Focus Area West Virginia Division of Natural Resources January 2021 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction to the State Wildlife Action Plan & Conservation Focus Areas .................................................... 2 Species of Greatest Conservation Need, Habitats and Stresses ................................................................... 2 Conservation Actions .................................................................................................................................... 2 Conservation Focus Areas and Action Plans ................................................................................................. 3 Climate Change and Resilience ..................................................................................................................... 4 Monitoring and Adaptive Management ....................................................................................................... 5 Organization of this Action Plan .................................................................................................................... 6 How to use this plan ..................................................................................................................................... 7 North Fork Mountain and Thorn Creek Conservation Focus Area ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View Or Download the Print
    AppalachianThe August / September 2012 VOICE CHANGING CURRENTS Navigating the Demands on Our Water in an Increasingly Thirsty World Hidden ALSO INSIDE: The Mighty Mussel • A Cold Summer for Coal • Blueberry Years Treasures Special Insert Part 2 The Appalachian Voice cross Appalachia A publication of A Environmental News From Around the Region AppalachianVoices A Note from our Executive Director 171 Grand Blvd • Boone, NC 28607 Dear Readers, 828-262-1500 Partnerships Protect Western North Carolina’s Rare Aquatic Ecosystems www.AppalachianVoices.org Clean water is as American as apple pie — and it takes a By Brian Sewell 90 low-elevation seeps, 20 the north and west of the Box Creek [email protected] lot of water to grow an apple. I prefer that water to be clean. identified rare vegetation Wilderness, a project proposed by the DITOR Jamie Goodman But dirty industries and their friends in Congress continue to Public and private groups E ........................ communities, and more U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service seeks MANAGING EDITOR ........................................... Brian Sewell put that basic right at risk. working together to protect land in than 80 Natural Heritage to protect some of the last remaining ASSOCIATE EDITOR ............................................Molly Moore Western North Carolina are mak- Why would anyone purposefully threaten one of the most Program Rare and Watch examples of Southern Appalachian DISTRIBUTION MANAGER .................................. Maeve Gould ing sure that the region’s aquatic GRAPHIC DESIGNER .........................................Meghan Darst basic requirements for life? List species. bogs, isolated wetlands scattered across ecosystems and the rare plants LEAD EDITORIAL ASSISTANT ........................ Jessica Kennedy In a time when it is Western North Carolina that are biodi- The likely answer is profit.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number ——— Page ——— NRIS Reference Number: 93000490 Date Listed: 11/3/93 Rohrbaugh Cabin Grant WV Property Name: County: State: Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. Date of/Action Amended Items in Nomination: A number of discrepancies in the resource count as recorded on the nomination form needed correction. The "portion of Smokehole Road," a contributing site, was not included in the count. In addition, the "log crib" was counted as a contributing building, but is more appropriately termed a "structure." The amended count is 2 contributing buildings, 2 non-contributing buildings, 2 contributing sites and 1 contributing structure. Ruth Bricker of the Monongahela National Forest was consulted about these changes. The nomination is officially amended to include this information. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NFS Form 10-900 f f OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service SEP 2 31993 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form ^.^ NATIONAL REGISTER This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations ji>r individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbe, C. , Jr . , 1899 , a General Report on the Physiography of Maryland
    Abbe , C. , Jr., 1899 , A gene ral re port on the physiography of Maryland : Maryland weather Service , p. 41-21€. Discusses physiography, landscape evolution, and drainage evolution of the Appalachians of Maryland . Abbe , c. , Jr., 1902 , The physiography of Garrett County, Maryland, in Garrett County, Maryland: Baltimore , Maryland Geological Survey , p. 27-54. Discu�ses physiography and structural control of landforms . Abrahams, A. D. , 1S85, Lithologic control of bedrock mea'lder dimensions in the Appalachian Valley and Ridg� province : A comment : Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, v. 10, p. 635-638. Braun's finding that the wavelength of bedrock meanders decreases as rock hardne5s increases is reconciled with Hack 's and Tinkler's finding that meander wavelength is greater in bedrock than alluvial channels. In populations of alluvial or bedrock channels, bank resistance cor.trols meander wavelength via its influence on channel shape and is negatively correlated wlth meander wavelength. In contrast, in mixed populations of alluvial and bedrock c�els, bank resistance controls meander wavelength through its effect on the recurrence interval of the channel-forming discharge and channel size and is positively correlated with meande r wavelength . Abrahams, A. D. , and Flint, J., 1983, Geological controls on the topological properties of some trellis channel networks : Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 94, p. 80-91. It has been assumed, but never quantitatively demonstrated, that the topological properties of trellis channel networks are strongly influenced by the unde rlying geology. In this study , the topological properties of 7 trellis networks unde rlain by a plunging syncline are analyzed and compared with those of 45 deneritic networks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature Conservancy
    A Golden History T he Nature ConservancyDNR in West V irginia By Diana Kile Green WVPhotographs by Kent Mason ctober 31, 2013, marks the 50th planet. Some of Earth’s most diverse temperate, deciduous year of The Nature Conservancy’s forests are found in the Central Appalachians, and the Ohio land conservation work in West River watershed is the second most diverse freshwater system Virginia. Also known as TNC, in North America. The Nature Conservancy is a non- TNC has a unique and low-profile method of land protec- profit organization dedicated to tion: it takes a businesslike, nonconfrontational, science-based conserving land and water, includ- approach. I like to say that TNC protects West Virginia’s spe- ing landscapes of high biological cial lands in the most effective way—they buy them, lease them, interest and ecological quality. accept the donation of them, or acquire conservation ease- The West Virginia Chapter was organized in 1963 by a ments, which permanently restrict development on a property. O The West Virginia Chapter is led by a state director and group of state volunteers deeply committed to conservation. But it wasn’t until 1979 that the chapter opened a field office a board that represents geographic areas of the state, as well in Charleston, with assistance from the Benedum Foundation as various professions, institutions, businesses, and areas of (established by Harrison County native Michael Benedum). expertise. Together they work with landowners—individuals, TNC has a chapter in every state and works globally in 30 companies, or governmental agencies—to secure protection for countries, but West Virginia is especially important because it ecologically important lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple-Use Management for Recreation in the East
    MULTIPLE-USE MANAGEMENT FOR RECREATION IN THE EAST by ROBERT L. PRAUSA, Branch Chief, Recreation Management, Eastern Region, Forest Service, U. S. Department of Agn'culture, Milwaukee, Wis. ABSTRACT. An overview of the complex management problems that confront the administrator of National Forest lands in the eastern United States, with emphasis on the conflicts that occur and will intensify as a result of the many demands for different kinds of recreation opportunities on National Forest System lands. The need to identify and measure the kinds of recreation opportunities these lands can provide is brought out, together with their relationships to lands of other ownership providing other kinds of recreation opportunities. OMPLEXITY AND DIVERSITY A worker is not anxious to end air pollution C characterize the Eastern Region of the if it also means an end to his job. The United States. Within each physio- affluent suburban dweller wants more and graphic province there are wide variations better highways, not only to speed his in soils, topography, vegetation, water, and travel to and from work, thereby giving climate. Such variations lead to great dif- him more time to recreate, but also to help ferences in patterns of land use and in the speed him away from congested areas for mixture of manufacturing, mining, and a quiet weekend of solitude before hurry- commerce as well as the outdoor recreation ing back to the city with its pollution, opportunities these lands afford. ulcers, noise, dented fenders, nameless The East is also characterized by a com- neighbors, and X-rated movies. plex and diverse populace.
    [Show full text]