A Stream Classification for the Appalachian Region

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Stream Classification for the Appalachian Region A Stream Classification for the Appalachian Region The Nature Conservancy Eastern Conservation Science Arlene Olivero Sheldon, Analie Barnett, and Mark G. Anderson Arlene Olivero Sheldon, Analie Barnett, and Mark G. Anderson The Nature Conservancy Eastern Conservation Science Eastern Regional Office 99 Bedford St, 5th Floor Boston, MA 02111 Please cite as: Olivero Sheldon, A., Barnett, A. and Anderson, M.G. 2015. A Stream Classification for the Appalachian Region. The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Conservation Science, Eastern Regional Office. Boston, MA. Funding for this project was supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative. Cover photo credits Top Left: Shavers Fork of the Cheat River at The Conservancy's Upper Shavers Fork Preserve in West Virginia. PHOTO CREDIT: © Kent Mason Top Right: Confluence of the smaller Tradewater River and the Ohio River in Crittenden County, Kentucky. PHOTO CREDIT: Mark Godfrey © The Nature Conservancy Bottom Left: Smoke Hole Canyon on the South Fork of the Potomac River in West Virginia. PHOTO CREDIT: © Kent Mason Small Middle Top: Forest view of the split channel in the upper Rappahannock River above Culpepper in northern Virginia. © Mary Porter Small Middle Bottom: The south fork of Red Creek flowing through the forest at Dolly Sods Wilderness. in the Allegheny Mountains of eastern West Virginia . PHOTO CREDIT: © Kent Mason Bottom Right: The Falls of Hills Creek in the Monongahela National Forest in West Virginia. PHOTO CREDIT: © Kent Mason Acknowledgements This project reflects decades of work by many organizations and dedicated individuals. Without their hard work and willingness to share their knowledge, this classification could not have been produced. We would particularly like to thank the Fish and Wildlife Service Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative for envisioning this project, and providing the funds to make it a reality. We are deeply indebted to the many organizations that provided data to help develop and calibrate the models used in this classification. We would like to particularly thank Ryan A. McManamay, Aquatic Ecologist, with the Oak Ridge National Laboratory for his excellent work in development of the hydrologic classes. We also wish to specifically thank Dylan Harrison-Atlas for his help modeling the detailed gradients, bankfull widths, and his advice regarding the confinement calculations. We extend a large thank you to Daren M. Carlisle, Ecological Studies Coordinator with the National Water-Quality Assessment Program of the U.S. Geological Survey, for sharing stream temperature data from USGS gages and the resultant modeled reference summer stream temperatures for these gages. We would also like to thank Yin-Phan Tsang and Dana Infante of Michigan State University for their data extract from the USGS NorEaST: Stream Temperature Data Inventory. We also appreciated additional stream temperature data shared with us from Tyrell DeWeber with the Pennsylvania Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit at The Pennsylvania State University. This dataset included data from C. Andrew Dolloff of USFS, Anthony Raburn of GA DNR, Mark Hudy of USGS, and David Thorne of WV DNR who we would also like to acknowledge and thank. We also particularly appreciated the detailed feedback and consistent review provided by John Faustini, Regional Hydrologist of USFWS. We would like to thank the members of the Appalachian LCC Stream Classification workgroup who provided feedback on our calls, sent us relevant reports, and reviewed our products. Members included Mary Kate Brown (TNC AL), Pat O'Neil (AL), Paul Freeman (TNC AL), Kathleen Owens (TNC GA), Sara Gottlieb (TNC GA), Cassie Hauswald (TNC IN), Todd Davis (IN), Danna Baxley (KY), Jeff Sole (TNC KY), Mike Floyd (USFWS KY), Andres Leslie (NC), Chris Goodreau (NC), Erin White (NY), Jeff Thomas (ORFP OH), John Stark (TNC OH), Diana Day (PA), Dustin Shull (PA), Mary Walsh (PA Heritage), Gary Walters (PA), Andrew Henderson (TVA TN), Sally Palmer (TNC TN), Joseph Wisby (TNC TN), Brad Fink (VA), Braven Beaty (TNC VA), Paul Angermeier (VA Tech University / USFWS Coop), Todd Janeski (VA), Keith Fisher (TNC WV), Walt Kordek (WV), Mary Davis (SARP), Dylan Harrison Atlas (Colorado State University, PhD candidate), Shannon Brewer (Oaklahoma State University), Jennifer Fulton (USEPA), Lou Reynolds (USEPA), Donovan Henry (USFWS), Emily Granstaff (USFWS), John Faustini (USFWS), Mark Cantrell (USFWS), Peggy Shute (USFWS), Nathanial Hitt (USGS), Jeff Frey (USGS Indiana Science Center), and Ryan McManamay (Oak Ridge National Laboratory). Abstract We developed a hierarchical classification system and map for stream and river systems in the Appalachian Landscape Conservation Cooperative region encompassing parts of 17 states. The product is intended to complement state-based stream classifications by unifying them into a single consistent system that represents the region’s natural flowing-water aquatic habitats. The results may be used to understand ecological flow relationships and inform conservation planning for aquatic biodiversity in the region. The classification used six primary attributes to define stream habitats: size, gradient, temperature, hydrology, buffering capacity, and confinement. These variables were identified and agreed upon by a steering committee of stream and river experts representing the states and region. All mapped stream reaches (1:100,000) were tagged with information on each variable based on extensive data compiled, or modeled, for each reach. For each variable, ecologically meaningful class breaks were identified and the variable classes were combined to yield a regional taxonomy. The complete set of types was simplified using recommended prioritization and collapsing rules as follows: headwaters and small rivers were classified based on gradient, temperature, and hydrology (e.g., high gradient, cold, flashy, headwater) and medium to great rivers were classified based on confinement, temperature, and hydrology (e.g., low gradient, warm, unconfined, large river). The simplification identified 62 stream types within the study area. Table of Contents 1 Background ............................................................................................................ 1 Objective ................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Area ............................................................................................................................. 1 Classification Process .......................................................................................................... 2 Base Hydrography Data ...................................................................................................... 4 Base Flowline Attributes ..................................................................................................... 4 Literature Review ................................................................................................................... 4 2 Regional Scale Classification ........................................................................... 5 Omernick Level 3 Ecoregions ............................................................................................ 6 Freshwater Ecoregions ........................................................................................................ 7 Ecological Drainage Units .................................................................................................. 8 Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUCs) ......................................................................................... 9 3 Reach Scale Classification ............................................................................. 10 4 Size ......................................................................................................................... 11 Ecological Importance ....................................................................................................... 11 Approach ................................................................................................................................ 11 Methods and Results ......................................................................................................... 12 5 Gradient ................................................................................................................ 19 Ecological Importance ....................................................................................................... 19 Approach ................................................................................................................................ 19 Methods and Results ......................................................................................................... 20 6 Temperature ........................................................................................................ 27 Ecological Importance ....................................................................................................... 27 Approach ................................................................................................................................ 27 Methods and Results ......................................................................................................... 29 7 Hydrology ............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Carmine Shiner (Notropis Percobromus) in Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Carmine Shiner Notropis percobromus in Canada THREATENED 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the carmine shiner Notropis percobromus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 29 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous reports COSEWIC 2001. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the carmine shiner Notropis percobromus and rosyface shiner Notropis rubellus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. v + 17 pp. Houston, J. 1994. COSEWIC status report on the rosyface shiner Notropis rubellus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-17 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge D.B. Stewart for writing the update status report on the carmine shiner Notropis percobromus in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Robert Campbell, Co-chair, COSEWIC Freshwater Fishes Species Specialist Subcommittee. In 1994 and again in 2001, COSEWIC assessed minnows belonging to the rosyface shiner species complex, including those in Manitoba, as rosyface shiner (Notropis rubellus). For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la tête carminée (Notropis percobromus) au Canada – Mise à jour.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroinvertebrate Communities and Habitat Characteristics in the Northern and Southern Colorado Plateau Networks Pilot Protocol Implementation
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Macroinvertebrate Communities and Habitat Characteristics in the Northern and Southern Colorado Plateau Networks Pilot Protocol Implementation Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2010/320 ON THE COVER Clockwise from bottom left: Coyote Gulch, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (USGS/Anne Brasher); Intermittent stream (USGS/Anne Brasher); Coyote Gulch, Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (USGS/Anne Brasher); Caddisfl y larvae of the genus Neophylax (USGS/Steve Fend); Adult damselfi les (USGS/Terry Short). Macroinvertebrate Communities and Habitat Characteristics in the Northern and Southern Colorado Plateau Networks Pilot Protocol Implementation Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2010/320 Authors Anne M. D. Brasher Christine M. Albano Rebecca N. Close Quinn H. Cannon Matthew P. Miller U.S. Geological Survey Utah Water Science Center 121 West 200 South Moab, Utah 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network National Park Service P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 May 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that ad- dress natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Ser- vice and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Mites of the Genus Arrenurus (Acari; Hydrachnida) from Europe and North America
    Department of Animal Morphology Institute of Environmental Biology Adam Mickiewicz University Mariusz Więcek EFFECTS OF THE EVOLUTION OF INTROMISSION ON COURTSHIP COMPLEXITY AND MALE AND FEMALE MORPHOLOGY: WATER MITES OF THE GENUS ARRENURUS (ACARI; HYDRACHNIDA) FROM EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA Mentors: Prof. Jacek Dabert – Institute of Environmental Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University Prof. Heather Proctor – Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta POZNAŃ 2015 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I want to thank my mentor Prof. Jacek Dabert. It has been an honor to be his Ph.D. student. I would like to thank for his assistance and support. I appreciate the time and patience he invested in my research. My mentor, Prof. Heather Proctor, guided me into the field of behavioural biology, and advised on a number of issues during the project. She has been given me support and helped to carry through. I appreciate the time and effort she invested in my research. My research activities would not have happened without Prof. Lubomira Burchardt who allowed me to work in her team. Many thanks to Dr. Peter Martin who introduced me into the world of water mites. His enthusiasm was motivational and supportive, and inspirational discussions contributed to higher standard of my research work. I thank Dr. Mirosława Dabert for introducing me in to techniques of molecular biology. I appreciate Dr. Reinhard Gerecke and Dr. Harry Smit who provided research material for this study. Many thanks to Prof. Bruce Smith for assistance in identification of mites and sharing his expert knowledge in the field of pheromonal communication. I appreciate Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphic Classification of Rivers
    9.36 Geomorphic Classification of Rivers JM Buffington, U.S. Forest Service, Boise, ID, USA DR Montgomery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Published by Elsevier Inc. 9.36.1 Introduction 730 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification 730 9.36.3 Types of Channel Classification 731 9.36.3.1 Stream Order 731 9.36.3.2 Process Domains 732 9.36.3.3 Channel Pattern 732 9.36.3.4 Channel–Floodplain Interactions 735 9.36.3.5 Bed Material and Mobility 737 9.36.3.6 Channel Units 739 9.36.3.7 Hierarchical Classifications 739 9.36.3.8 Statistical Classifications 745 9.36.4 Use and Compatibility of Channel Classifications 745 9.36.5 The Rise and Fall of Classifications: Why Are Some Channel Classifications More Used Than Others? 747 9.36.6 Future Needs and Directions 753 9.36.6.1 Standardization and Sample Size 753 9.36.6.2 Remote Sensing 754 9.36.7 Conclusion 755 Acknowledgements 756 References 756 Appendix 762 9.36.1 Introduction 9.36.2 Purpose of Classification Over the last several decades, environmental legislation and a A basic tenet in geomorphology is that ‘form implies process.’As growing awareness of historical human disturbance to rivers such, numerous geomorphic classifications have been de- worldwide (Schumm, 1977; Collins et al., 2003; Surian and veloped for landscapes (Davis, 1899), hillslopes (Varnes, 1958), Rinaldi, 2003; Nilsson et al., 2005; Chin, 2006; Walter and and rivers (Section 9.36.3). The form–process paradigm is a Merritts, 2008) have fostered unprecedented collaboration potentially powerful tool for conducting quantitative geo- among scientists, land managers, and stakeholders to better morphic investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research
    CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research No. 25 ISSN 0172-1941 (printed) 1891-5426 (online) November 2012 CONTENTS Editorial: Inventories - What are they good for? 3 Dr. William P. Coffman: Celebrating 50 years of research on Chironomidae 4 Dear Sepp! 9 Dr. Marta Margreiter-Kownacka 14 Current Research Sharma, S. et al. Chironomidae (Diptera) in the Himalayan Lakes - A study of sub- fossil assemblages in the sediments of two high altitude lakes from Nepal 15 Krosch, M. et al. Non-destructive DNA extraction from Chironomidae, including fragile pupal exuviae, extends analysable collections and enhances vouchering 22 Martin, J. Kiefferulus barbitarsis (Kieffer, 1911) and Kiefferulus tainanus (Kieffer, 1912) are distinct species 28 Short Communications An easy to make and simple designed rearing apparatus for Chironomidae 33 Some proposed emendations to larval morphology terminology 35 Chironomids in Quaternary permafrost deposits in the Siberian Arctic 39 New books, resources and announcements 43 Finnish Chironomidae 47 Chironomini indet. (Paratendipes?) from La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Photo by Carlos de la Rosa. CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research Editors Torbjørn EKREM, Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Peter H. LANGTON, 16, Irish Society Court, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, Northern Ireland BT52 1GX The CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research is devoted to all aspects of chironomid research and aims to be an updated news bulletin for the Chironomidae research community. The newsletter is published yearly in October/November, is open access, and can be downloaded free from this website: http:// www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/chironomus. Publisher is the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives Considered
    Forest-wide NNIS Management Project Chapter 2 – Alternatives Considered Chapter 2 – Alternatives Considered This chapter: Describes the alternatives that were considered to address issues and concerns; Identifies the design features and mitigation measures that would be implemented to reduce the chance of adverse resource effects; and Summarizes the activities and effects of the alternatives in comparative form to clearly display the differences between each alternative and to provide a clear basis for choice among options by the decision maker and the public. 2.1 - Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study During initial planning and scoping, several potential alternatives to the proposed action were suggested. The following is a summary of the alternatives that contributed to the overall range of alternatives considered, but, for the reasons noted here, were eliminated from detailed study. 2.1.1 - Control NNIS on Private Land Not Adjacent to National Forest Land Several people expressed interest in collaborating with the Forest to control NNIS on private property that is not adjacent to National Forest land. While such collaboration may be desirable for reducing local NNIS populations, the proper vehicle for such collaboration is a Cooperative Weed Management Area (CWMA) involving landowners, the Forest Service, and other state, federal, and local agencies. The purpose and need focuses on authorizing treatment of infestations; collaborating to achieve control on a broader scale can be pursued independent of this project as staff and funding allow. Elimination of this concept as an alternative does not preclude the Forest from collaborating with the owners of land that is adjacent to treatment sites on National Forest land.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9111799 Evolutionary morphology of the locomotor apparatus in Arachnida Shultz, Jeffrey Walden, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphological Change and River Rehabilitation Alterra Is the Main Dutch Centre of Expertise on Rural Areas and Water Management
    Geomorphological Change and River Rehabilitation Alterra is the main Dutch centre of expertise on rural areas and water management. It was founded 1 January 2000. Alterra combines a huge range of expertise on rural areas and their sustainable use, including aspects such as water, wildlife, forests, the environment, soils, landscape, climate and recreation, as well as various other aspects relevant to the development and management of the environment we live in. Alterra engages in strategic and applied research to support design processes, policymaking and management at the local, national and international level. This includes not only innovative, interdisciplinary research on complex problems relating to rural areas, but also the production of readily applicable knowledge and expertise enabling rapid and adequate solutions to practical problems. The many themes of Alterra’s research effort include relations between cities and their surrounding countryside, multiple use of rural areas, economy and ecology, integrated water management, sustainable agricultural systems, planning for the future, expert systems and modelling, biodiversity, landscape planning and landscape perception, integrated forest management, geoinformation and remote sensing, spatial planning of leisure activities, habitat creation in marine and estuarine waters, green belt development and ecological webs, and pollution risk assessment. Alterra is part of Wageningen University and Research centre (Wageningen UR) and includes two research sites, one in Wageningen and one on the island of Texel. Geomorphological Change and River Rehabilitation Case Studies on Lowland Fluvial Systems in the Netherlands H.P. Wolfert ALTERRA SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTIONS 6 ALTERRA GREEN WORLD RESEARCH, WAGENINGEN 2001 This volume was also published as a PhD Thesis of Utrecht University Promotor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • September 18,2008 This Letter Is to Give You Arguments As to Why I Am
    September 18,2008 This letter is to give you arguments as to why I am opposed to PATH, the 1% c9 line proposal to go through the North Fork Valley in West Virginia. -vz~a 2- 0 ac?) I was born and raised in Virginia. In 1990 my husband and I found a beautiR1 pie% op property in Grant Co. West Virginia, only two and a half hours &om om home in Manassas, Va. The land was pasture land with no water or electricity. We built a humble cabin to live in when we visited our land, usually on weekends. We found our visits were steadily increasing and in 2001 we had a 3 bedroom house built. In 2005, tired of the traffic and the rat race of Northern Virginia, on a leap of faith we retired from good paying government jobs and moved to our WV home. We wanted to share the beauty of this land which led us to our decision to add on and Breakfast. In January of 2006 we opened Breath o In our guestbook are many happy notes from people who have stayed at our Bed and Breakfast and who have hked the nearby North Mountain.. “. .. we enjoyed everythlng... touring Smoke Hole Canyon, hiking Seneca Rocks and Dolly Sods, and “duckying” on the Potomac.. ” Ths family of four also had hked North Fork Mountain which challenged us along with our grandchildren on the same hike this past July. These notes include people from Norway, Great Britain, Australia, and one from France who wrote in her best English, “This beautiful landscape you have chance to live here.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on the NCWRC's Scientific Council of Fishes Rare
    A Summary of the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina Submitted by Bryn H. Tracy North Carolina Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Raleigh, NC On behalf of the NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes November 01, 2014 Bigeye Jumprock, Scartomyzon (Moxostoma) ariommum, State Threatened Photograph by Noel Burkhead and Robert Jenkins, courtesy of the Virginia Division of Game and Inland Fisheries and the Southeastern Fishes Council (http://www.sefishescouncil.org/). Table of Contents Page Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 3 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes In North Carolina ........... 4 Summaries from the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina .......................................................................................................................... 12 Recent Activities of NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes .................................................. 13 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part I, Ohio Lamprey .............................................. 14 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part II, “Atlantic” Highfin Carpsucker ...................... 17 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part III, Tennessee Darter ...................................... 20 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019
    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES
    ECOLOGY of NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISHES Tables STEPHEN T. ROSS University of California Press Berkeley Los Angeles London © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California ISBN 978-0-520-24945-5 uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 1 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 2 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 1.1 Families Composing 95% of North American Freshwater Fish Species Ranked by the Number of Native Species Number Cumulative Family of species percent Cyprinidae 297 28 Percidae 186 45 Catostomidae 71 51 Poeciliidae 69 58 Ictaluridae 46 62 Goodeidae 45 66 Atherinopsidae 39 70 Salmonidae 38 74 Cyprinodontidae 35 77 Fundulidae 34 80 Centrarchidae 31 83 Cottidae 30 86 Petromyzontidae 21 88 Cichlidae 16 89 Clupeidae 10 90 Eleotridae 10 91 Acipenseridae 8 92 Osmeridae 6 92 Elassomatidae 6 93 Gobiidae 6 93 Amblyopsidae 6 94 Pimelodidae 6 94 Gasterosteidae 5 95 source: Compiled primarily from Mayden (1992), Nelson et al. (2004), and Miller and Norris (2005). uucp-ross-book-color.indbcp-ross-book-color.indb 3 44/5/13/5/13 88:34:34 AAMM TABLE 3.1 Biogeographic Relationships of Species from a Sample of Fishes from the Ouachita River, Arkansas, at the Confl uence with the Little Missouri River (Ross, pers. observ.) Origin/ Pre- Pleistocene Taxa distribution Source Highland Stoneroller, Campostoma spadiceum 2 Mayden 1987a; Blum et al. 2008; Cashner et al. 2010 Blacktail Shiner, Cyprinella venusta 3 Mayden 1987a Steelcolor Shiner, Cyprinella whipplei 1 Mayden 1987a Redfi n Shiner, Lythrurus umbratilis 4 Mayden 1987a Bigeye Shiner, Notropis boops 1 Wiley and Mayden 1985; Mayden 1987a Bullhead Minnow, Pimephales vigilax 4 Mayden 1987a Mountain Madtom, Noturus eleutherus 2a Mayden 1985, 1987a Creole Darter, Etheostoma collettei 2a Mayden 1985 Orangebelly Darter, Etheostoma radiosum 2a Page 1983; Mayden 1985, 1987a Speckled Darter, Etheostoma stigmaeum 3 Page 1983; Simon 1997 Redspot Darter, Etheostoma artesiae 3 Mayden 1985; Piller et al.
    [Show full text]