DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number ——— Page ——— NRIS Reference Number: 93000490 Date Listed: 11/3/93 Rohrbaugh Cabin Grant WV Property Name: County: State: Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. Date of/Action Amended Items in Nomination: A number of discrepancies in the resource count as recorded on the nomination form needed correction. The "portion of Smokehole Road," a contributing site, was not included in the count. In addition, the "log crib" was counted as a contributing building, but is more appropriately termed a "structure." The amended count is 2 contributing buildings, 2 non-contributing buildings, 2 contributing sites and 1 contributing structure. Ruth Bricker of the Monongahela National Forest was consulted about these changes. The nomination is officially amended to include this information. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NFS Form 10-900 f f OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service SEP 2 31993 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form ^.^ NATIONAL REGISTER This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations ji>r individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A'Hpr "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1 . Name of Property historic Rohrbaugh Cabin other names/site number Allegheny Cabin 2. Location Smokehole Road. SR 28/11, 3 miles South of intersection with SR 28/55 street & number Monongahela National Forest____________________ n not for publication city or town Petersburg vicinity state West Virginia code county Grant code 023 zip code 26847 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this^S^ nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ^Sj, meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant O nationally ^Sl^statewide EH tocally. (d See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State of Federal agency and bureau In my opijjion, the property "0. m D does not meet the National Register criteria. (D See continuation sheet for additional comme State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I herebyjetfrtify that the property is: of the Keeper Date of Action (Centered in the National Register. EH See continuation sheet. D determined eligible for the National Register D See continuation sheet. Q determined not eligible for the National Register. CD removed from the National Register. D other, (explain:) _________ MAY11 71 1993»~v Rohrbauah Cabin Grant , WV Name of Property County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) D private S building(s) Contributing Noncontributing D public-local D district 3 2 huilrlinns D public-State D site [I public-Federal D structure sites D object 1 structures objects 4 2 Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously listed (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) in the National Register N/A N/A 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Domestic/Single Dwelling Domestic Single Dwelling Vacant/Not in Use 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Other - Hewn Log House foundation Limestone walls • Log______ roof Tin other Chimney-Limestone Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) (See Continuation Sheet) ntti 7 Rohrbaugh Cabin Grant, WV Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria 'Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions) for National Register listing.) Social History_____ ED A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. D B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. D C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack Period of Significance individual distinction. 1880-1940 D D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield,, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Significant Dates (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) Property is: D A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Significant Person D B removed from its original location. (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) D C a birthplace or grave. Cultural Affiliation D D a cemetery. D E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. D F a commemorative property. D G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance Architect/Builder within the past 50 years. Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: D preliminary determination of individual listing (36 D State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested D Other State agency D previously listed in the National Register D Federal agency D previously determined eligible by the National n Local government Register D University D designated a National Historic Landmark D Other D recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey Name of repository: #_______________ D recorded by Historic American Engineering - Record # _____________ Rohrbaugh Cabin Grant, WV Name of Property County and State 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property ± .4.25 Acres Around Cabin UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.) -I |1 ,7 | 1615121314,0 4|3|1|3|1|2|0| Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing I I I I I I See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By name/title C. Richard Bierce, AIA & Dove & Associates, Inc. organization Historical Architect/Consulting ____ date January 15, 1993 street & number 121 S. Royal Street________ __ telephone 703-836-9085 city or town Alexandria_________________ state VA______ zip code 22314 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. (Site Plan - Rohrbaugh Cabin) Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner (Complete this item at the request of SHPO or FPO.) name____________________________________________________________________ street & number telephone city or town __ state zip code Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alternatives Considered
    Forest-wide NNIS Management Project Chapter 2 – Alternatives Considered Chapter 2 – Alternatives Considered This chapter: Describes the alternatives that were considered to address issues and concerns; Identifies the design features and mitigation measures that would be implemented to reduce the chance of adverse resource effects; and Summarizes the activities and effects of the alternatives in comparative form to clearly display the differences between each alternative and to provide a clear basis for choice among options by the decision maker and the public. 2.1 - Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Study During initial planning and scoping, several potential alternatives to the proposed action were suggested. The following is a summary of the alternatives that contributed to the overall range of alternatives considered, but, for the reasons noted here, were eliminated from detailed study. 2.1.1 - Control NNIS on Private Land Not Adjacent to National Forest Land Several people expressed interest in collaborating with the Forest to control NNIS on private property that is not adjacent to National Forest land. While such collaboration may be desirable for reducing local NNIS populations, the proper vehicle for such collaboration is a Cooperative Weed Management Area (CWMA) involving landowners, the Forest Service, and other state, federal, and local agencies. The purpose and need focuses on authorizing treatment of infestations; collaborating to achieve control on a broader scale can be pursued independent of this project as staff and funding allow. Elimination of this concept as an alternative does not preclude the Forest from collaborating with the owners of land that is adjacent to treatment sites on National Forest land.
    [Show full text]
  • September 18,2008 This Letter Is to Give You Arguments As to Why I Am
    September 18,2008 This letter is to give you arguments as to why I am opposed to PATH, the 1% c9 line proposal to go through the North Fork Valley in West Virginia. -vz~a 2- 0 ac?) I was born and raised in Virginia. In 1990 my husband and I found a beautiR1 pie% op property in Grant Co. West Virginia, only two and a half hours &om om home in Manassas, Va. The land was pasture land with no water or electricity. We built a humble cabin to live in when we visited our land, usually on weekends. We found our visits were steadily increasing and in 2001 we had a 3 bedroom house built. In 2005, tired of the traffic and the rat race of Northern Virginia, on a leap of faith we retired from good paying government jobs and moved to our WV home. We wanted to share the beauty of this land which led us to our decision to add on and Breakfast. In January of 2006 we opened Breath o In our guestbook are many happy notes from people who have stayed at our Bed and Breakfast and who have hked the nearby North Mountain.. “. .. we enjoyed everythlng... touring Smoke Hole Canyon, hiking Seneca Rocks and Dolly Sods, and “duckying” on the Potomac.. ” Ths family of four also had hked North Fork Mountain which challenged us along with our grandchildren on the same hike this past July. These notes include people from Norway, Great Britain, Australia, and one from France who wrote in her best English, “This beautiful landscape you have chance to live here.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • Grant County Plan PC 12-5-13
    Grant County Plan Developed by the Grant County Planning Commission with the assistance of Aaron Costenbader, Kathryn Ferreitra, & Vishesh Maskey Under the direction of Michael John Dougherty, Extension Specialist & Professor Adopted March 2011 Revised July 2013 Grant County Plan Developed by the Grant County Planning Commission with the assistance of Aaron Costenbader, Kathryn Ferreitra, & Vishesh Maskey Under the direction of Michael John Dougherty, Extension Specialist & Professor Adopted March 2011 Revised July 2013 West Virginia University Extension Service Community Resources and Economic Development 2104 Agricultural Sciences Building PO Box 6108 Morgantown, WV 26506-6108 304-293-2559 (Voice) 304-293-6954 (Fax) [email protected] GRANT COUNTY PLAN Page I Grant County Plan Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Plan Background ............................................................................................................................. 2 Planning Process ............................................................................................................................. 4 County Profile .............................................................................................................................. 5 Table 1: Historical Population ....................................................................................................... 5 Table 2: Comparative Population
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Lidar to 3D Structural Mapping
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2019 Application of Lidar to 3D Structural Mapping Bertrand Gaschot West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Gaschot, Bertrand, "Application of Lidar to 3D Structural Mapping" (2019). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4111. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4111 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Application of Lidar to 3D Structural Mapping Bertrand Gaschot Thesis submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in GEOLOGY Jaime Toro, Ph.D., Chair Dengliang Gao, Ph.D. Aaron Maxwell, Ph.D. Department of Geology and Geography Morgantown, West Virginia 2018 Keywords: Lidar, Smoke Hole Canyon, Structure, 3D Mapping, Kinematic Modeling Copyright 2019 Bertrand Gaschot ABSTRACT Application of Lidar to 3D Structural Mapping Bertrand Gaschot The rugged, densely forested terrain of the West Virginia Appalachian Valley and Ridge Province has made it difficult for field-based studies to agree on the structure of the highly deformed Silurian-Devonian cover strata.
    [Show full text]
  • The Highlands Voice February, 2017 Page 1 West Virginia Highlands Conservancy Non-Profit Org
    The Highlands Voice February, 2017 Page 1 West Virginia Highlands Conservancy Non-Profit Org. PO. Box 306 U.S. Postage PAID Charleston, WV 25321 Permit No. 2831 Charleston, WV The Highlands Voice The Monthly Publication of the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy Volume 50 No. `2 February, 2017 Whoa, hold your horses FERC, Dominion Seek to By John McFerrin Rush Pipeline Review The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and anticipated a big pipeline running through the Forest. Because of Dominion Resources have proposed an accelerated schedule this, it would be illegal to allow a pipeline to cross the Forests unless for approval of the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline. The Forest those plans are changed. Service has pushed back against that proposal, suggesting a more As a matter of law, neither a change in the Land and Resource thorough review. Management Plan nor issuance of a special use permit can come Dominion’s proposed 600-mile Atlantic Coast Pipeline about before the Forest Service has all the relevant information and would cross 21 miles of the George Washington and Monongahela follows its procedures. National Forests. In order to build the pipeline, Dominion must have So far, the Forest Service has not shown any hostility to approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). the proposed pipeline. Neither has it shown any great fondness. It must also have the approval of the U.S. Forest Service. Instead, it has consistently shown its commitment to a careful and The Forest Service approval would come in the form of a thorough analysis of the pipeline, requiring the applicant to provide Special Use permit that would allow the construction of the pipeline complete and high quality information and making decisions based on the National Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • North Fork Mountain and Thorn Creek CFA Action Plan
    Action Plan for the North Fork Mountain & Thorn Creek Conservation Focus Area West Virginia Division of Natural Resources January 2021 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction to the State Wildlife Action Plan & Conservation Focus Areas .................................................... 2 Species of Greatest Conservation Need, Habitats and Stresses ................................................................... 2 Conservation Actions .................................................................................................................................... 2 Conservation Focus Areas and Action Plans ................................................................................................. 3 Climate Change and Resilience ..................................................................................................................... 4 Monitoring and Adaptive Management ....................................................................................................... 5 Organization of this Action Plan .................................................................................................................... 6 How to use this plan ..................................................................................................................................... 7 North Fork Mountain and Thorn Creek Conservation Focus Area ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View Or Download the Print
    AppalachianThe August / September 2012 VOICE CHANGING CURRENTS Navigating the Demands on Our Water in an Increasingly Thirsty World Hidden ALSO INSIDE: The Mighty Mussel • A Cold Summer for Coal • Blueberry Years Treasures Special Insert Part 2 The Appalachian Voice cross Appalachia A publication of A Environmental News From Around the Region AppalachianVoices A Note from our Executive Director 171 Grand Blvd • Boone, NC 28607 Dear Readers, 828-262-1500 Partnerships Protect Western North Carolina’s Rare Aquatic Ecosystems www.AppalachianVoices.org Clean water is as American as apple pie — and it takes a By Brian Sewell 90 low-elevation seeps, 20 the north and west of the Box Creek [email protected] lot of water to grow an apple. I prefer that water to be clean. identified rare vegetation Wilderness, a project proposed by the DITOR Jamie Goodman But dirty industries and their friends in Congress continue to Public and private groups E ........................ communities, and more U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service seeks MANAGING EDITOR ........................................... Brian Sewell put that basic right at risk. working together to protect land in than 80 Natural Heritage to protect some of the last remaining ASSOCIATE EDITOR ............................................Molly Moore Western North Carolina are mak- Why would anyone purposefully threaten one of the most Program Rare and Watch examples of Southern Appalachian DISTRIBUTION MANAGER .................................. Maeve Gould ing sure that the region’s aquatic GRAPHIC DESIGNER .........................................Meghan Darst basic requirements for life? List species. bogs, isolated wetlands scattered across ecosystems and the rare plants LEAD EDITORIAL ASSISTANT ........................ Jessica Kennedy In a time when it is Western North Carolina that are biodi- The likely answer is profit.
    [Show full text]
  • ECONOMICS of OUT- and Nat
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 058 998 RC 005 937 TITLE RecreationSymposiumProceedings. The Forest RecreationSymposium(State University of NewYork College of Forestry, Syracuse,12-14 October 1971). Darby, Pa. Northeastern INSTITUTION Forest Service (DOA), Upper Forest ExperimentStation.; State Univ. of NewYork, Syracuse. Coll. of Forestry. PUB DATE 71 NOTE 217p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$9.87 Development; Management; DESCRIPTORS Athletic Activities; Personality Studies; *Planning;*Program Development; *Recreation; RecreationalActivities; Recreationists; *Research Needs; Resources;*Symposia ABSTRACT In this collectionof 26 papers presented atthe 1971 information is Forest RecreationSymposiumheld at Syracuse, N.Y., presented about the forest resourceand forest recreationresearch. of the planner and the The symposium, designedto help meet the needs manager in bothpublic and private areas of the forest recreation resource, covered 5general areas:(1) Planning andDeveloping the Recreation Resource,(2) Managing theRecreation Resource, (3) Characterizing the RecreationUser,(4) Specific Managerial Considerations Related to UserCharacteristics, and (5) A Lookat the Research Task Ahead. Amongthespecific topicscovered were the recreation-resource inventory process,predicting values of design of facilities,economicsof recreation participation, analysis recreation development andprivate-recreation enterprises, ranking systems, multiple usefor recreation of environmental-quality of recreation in the East, law enforcement,and carrying capacity areas. Includedare 337references. (MJB) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO- DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG- INATING IT. POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN- IONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDU- CATION POSITION OR POLICY. 15 P 11U 44. CEE INGS tel ..7),". vf viemplit a. Planned and Presented by: " -a. U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbe, C. , Jr . , 1899 , a General Report on the Physiography of Maryland
    Abbe , C. , Jr., 1899 , A gene ral re port on the physiography of Maryland : Maryland weather Service , p. 41-21€. Discusses physiography, landscape evolution, and drainage evolution of the Appalachians of Maryland . Abbe , c. , Jr., 1902 , The physiography of Garrett County, Maryland, in Garrett County, Maryland: Baltimore , Maryland Geological Survey , p. 27-54. Discu�ses physiography and structural control of landforms . Abrahams, A. D. , 1S85, Lithologic control of bedrock mea'lder dimensions in the Appalachian Valley and Ridg� province : A comment : Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, v. 10, p. 635-638. Braun's finding that the wavelength of bedrock meanders decreases as rock hardne5s increases is reconciled with Hack 's and Tinkler's finding that meander wavelength is greater in bedrock than alluvial channels. In populations of alluvial or bedrock channels, bank resistance cor.trols meander wavelength via its influence on channel shape and is negatively correlated wlth meander wavelength. In contrast, in mixed populations of alluvial and bedrock c�els, bank resistance controls meander wavelength through its effect on the recurrence interval of the channel-forming discharge and channel size and is positively correlated with meande r wavelength . Abrahams, A. D. , and Flint, J., 1983, Geological controls on the topological properties of some trellis channel networks : Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 94, p. 80-91. It has been assumed, but never quantitatively demonstrated, that the topological properties of trellis channel networks are strongly influenced by the unde rlying geology. In this study , the topological properties of 7 trellis networks unde rlain by a plunging syncline are analyzed and compared with those of 45 deneritic networks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature Conservancy
    A Golden History T he Nature ConservancyDNR in West V irginia By Diana Kile Green WVPhotographs by Kent Mason ctober 31, 2013, marks the 50th planet. Some of Earth’s most diverse temperate, deciduous year of The Nature Conservancy’s forests are found in the Central Appalachians, and the Ohio land conservation work in West River watershed is the second most diverse freshwater system Virginia. Also known as TNC, in North America. The Nature Conservancy is a non- TNC has a unique and low-profile method of land protec- profit organization dedicated to tion: it takes a businesslike, nonconfrontational, science-based conserving land and water, includ- approach. I like to say that TNC protects West Virginia’s spe- ing landscapes of high biological cial lands in the most effective way—they buy them, lease them, interest and ecological quality. accept the donation of them, or acquire conservation ease- The West Virginia Chapter was organized in 1963 by a ments, which permanently restrict development on a property. O The West Virginia Chapter is led by a state director and group of state volunteers deeply committed to conservation. But it wasn’t until 1979 that the chapter opened a field office a board that represents geographic areas of the state, as well in Charleston, with assistance from the Benedum Foundation as various professions, institutions, businesses, and areas of (established by Harrison County native Michael Benedum). expertise. Together they work with landowners—individuals, TNC has a chapter in every state and works globally in 30 companies, or governmental agencies—to secure protection for countries, but West Virginia is especially important because it ecologically important lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple-Use Management for Recreation in the East
    MULTIPLE-USE MANAGEMENT FOR RECREATION IN THE EAST by ROBERT L. PRAUSA, Branch Chief, Recreation Management, Eastern Region, Forest Service, U. S. Department of Agn'culture, Milwaukee, Wis. ABSTRACT. An overview of the complex management problems that confront the administrator of National Forest lands in the eastern United States, with emphasis on the conflicts that occur and will intensify as a result of the many demands for different kinds of recreation opportunities on National Forest System lands. The need to identify and measure the kinds of recreation opportunities these lands can provide is brought out, together with their relationships to lands of other ownership providing other kinds of recreation opportunities. OMPLEXITY AND DIVERSITY A worker is not anxious to end air pollution C characterize the Eastern Region of the if it also means an end to his job. The United States. Within each physio- affluent suburban dweller wants more and graphic province there are wide variations better highways, not only to speed his in soils, topography, vegetation, water, and travel to and from work, thereby giving climate. Such variations lead to great dif- him more time to recreate, but also to help ferences in patterns of land use and in the speed him away from congested areas for mixture of manufacturing, mining, and a quiet weekend of solitude before hurry- commerce as well as the outdoor recreation ing back to the city with its pollution, opportunities these lands afford. ulcers, noise, dented fenders, nameless The East is also characterized by a com- neighbors, and X-rated movies. plex and diverse populace.
    [Show full text]