Newsletter Number 37
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Key Lessons Learnt from Producing the ABC Programme Talking
The key lessons learnt from producing the ABC programme Talkin g Heads a talk show/documentary hybrid in a fast turnaround environment Jack King HND: Business Studies (Aston Birmingham) This exegesis is submitted as the written component for the degree of Master of Arts (Research) Film and Television Production: Creative Industries Queensland University of Technology 2009 Supervisors: Associate Professor Geoff Portmann and Associate Professor Alan McKee Abstract The following exegesis will detail the key advantages and disadvantages of combining a traditional talk show genre with a linear documentary format using a small production team and a limited budget in a fast turnaround weekly environment. It will deal with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation series Talking Heads, broadcast weekly in the early evening schedule for the network at 18.30 with the presenter Peter Thompson. As Executive Producer for the programme at its inception I was responsible for setting it up for the ABC in Brisbane, a role that included selecting most of the team to work on the series and commissioning the music, titles and all other aspects required to bring the show to the screen. What emerged when producing this generic hybrid will be examined at length, including: The talk show/documentary hybrid format needs longer than 26’30” to be entirely successful. The type of presenter ideally suited to the talk show/documentary format requires someone who is genuinely interested in their guests and flexible enough to maintain the format against tangential odds. The use of illustrative footage shot in a documentary style narrative improves the talk show format. -
Contents What’S New
July / August, No. 4/2011 CONTENTS WHAT’S NEW Quandamooka Native Title Determination ............................... 2 Win a free registration to the Joint Management Workshop at the 2011 National Native 2012 Native Title Conference! Title Conference: ‘What helps? What harms?’ ........................ 4 Just take 5 minutes to complete our An extract from Mabo in the Courts: Islander Tradition to publications survey and you will go into the Native Title: A Memoir ............................................................... 5 draw to win a free registration to the 2012 QLD Regional PBC Meeting ...................................................... 6 Native Title Conference. Those who have What’s New ................................................................................. 6 already completed the survey will be automatically included. Recent Cases ............................................................................. 6 Legislation and Policy ............................................................. 12 Complete the survey at: Native Title Publications ......................................................... 13 http://www.tfaforms.com/208207 Native Title in the News ........................................................... 14 If you have any questions or concerns, please Indigenous Land Use Agreements (ILUAs) ........................... 20 contact Matt O’Rourke at the Native Title Research Unit on (02) 6246 1158 or Determinations ......................................................................... 21 [email protected] -
A Landscape-Based Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability for All Native Hawaiian Plants
Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDscape-bASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMatE CHANGE VULNEraBILITY FOR ALL NatIVE HAWAIIAN PLANts Lucas Fortini1,2, Jonathan Price3, James Jacobi2, Adam Vorsino4, Jeff Burgett1,4, Kevin Brinck5, Fred Amidon4, Steve Miller4, Sam `Ohukani`ohi`a Gon III6, Gregory Koob7, and Eben Paxton2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service —Ecological Services, Division of Climate Change and Strategic Habitat Management, Honolulu, HI 96850 5 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 6 The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i Chapter, Honolulu, HI 96817 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hawaii/Pacific Islands Area State Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 November 2013 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CAG09AC00070 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDSCAPE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY FOR ALL NATIVE HAWAIIAN PLANTS LUCAS FORTINI1,2, JONATHAN PRICE3, JAMES JACOBI2, ADAM VORSINO4, JEFF BURGETT1,4, KEVIN BRINCK5, FRED AMIDON4, STEVE MILLER4, SAM ʽOHUKANIʽOHIʽA GON III 6, GREGORY KOOB7, AND EBEN PAXTON2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaiʽi National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawaiʽi at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U. -
July/August 2003 No.4/2003
July/August 2003 No.4/2003 The Native Title Newsletter is published Contents every second month. The newsletter includes a summary of native title as reported in the News from the Native Title press. Although the summary canvasses media Research Unit from around Australia, it is not intended to be Indigenous Rights Discussion Paper 2 an exhaustive review of developments. Indigenous Researchers Forum 2 The Native Title Newsletter also includes Takin’ it out and Takin’ it through 3 contributions from people involved in native title research and processes. Views ex- Feature pressed in the contributions are those of the David Ross - ‘Future Directions’ 4 authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Institute of Aboriginal Regular items and Torres Strait Islander Studies. Native title in the news 5 Applications lodged with NNTT 11 Stop Press Registration test decisions 11 The 2003 Indigenous Researchers Forum is being held from the 1-3 October at ‘Univer- Notifications 13 sity House’ at the Australian National Uni- Treaty, lets get it right: New Publication versity in Canberra. To register, or for more Recent additions to AIATSIS Library 15 information go to the AIATSIS website at: http://www.aiatsis.gov.au/ rsrch/ confer- Native title research unit publications 17 ences/irf2003/index.htm The Newsletter is also available in ELECTRONIC format. This will provide a FASTER service for you, and will make possible much greater distribution. If you would like to SUBSCRIBE to the Native Title Newsletter electronically, please send an email to [email protected], and you will be helping us provide a better service. -
Eugenia Reinwardtiana (Blume) DC
Australian Tropical Rainforest Plants - Online edition Eugenia reinwardtiana (Blume) DC. Family: Myrtaceae Candolle, A.P. de (1828) Prodromus 3: 267. Common name: Cedar Bay Cherry; Beach Cherry; Cherry, Beach Stem Occasionally grows into a small tree seldom exceeding 30 cm dbh but also flowers and fruits as a shrub. Leaves Leaf blades about 2-9 x 1-5 cm, petioles about 0.1-0.6 cm long. Oil dots visible with a lens if not visible to the naked eye. Terminal buds and young shoots clothed in pale, prostrate, silky hairs. Flowers Inflorescence axillary, never truly terminal, bracts persistent, pubescent, present at anthesis, about 1.5 x 0.7 mm. Flower buds pubescent. Pedicel absent but peduncles long and slender and usually ending in one flower. Calyx tube (hypanthium) pubescent, 2-4 x 2-4 mm, calyx lobes rounded, Leaves and flower [not concave adaxially, more sparsely pubescent than the calyx tube (hypanthium), dimorphic, inner vouchered]. CC-BY J.L. Dowe lobes larger, about 2.5-3 mm long, +/- horizontal at anthesis. Petals +/- orbicular, glabrous except for the ciliate margins, about 3-3.5 mm diam., oil dots variable in number, about 30-70 per petal. Outer anther filaments about 3-5 mm long, anthers about 0.5-0.6 x 0.6-0.8 mm, gland inconspicuous, small, terminal, staminal disk broad, +/- level and conforming with the apex of the ovary. Ovules about 6-14 per locule. Style about 2.5-5.5 mm long, approximating the stamens. Fruit Fruits globular, depressed globular or ovoid, sometimes bilobed, attaining about 15-21 x 13-23 mm, calyx lobes persistent at the apex, about 2.5 mm long, pericarp succulent despite included fibres. -
Guam's Forest Resources
United States Department of Agriculture Guam’s Forest Resources: Forest Inventory and Analysis, 2013 Michelle Lazaro, Olaf Kuegler, Sharon Stanton, Ashley Lehman, Joseph Mafnas, and Mikhail Yatskov Forest Pacific Northwest Resource Bulletin February D E E P R A U R T Research Station PNW-RB-270 2020 T L Service MENT OF AGRICU In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. -
Myrtle Rust Reviewed the Impacts of the Invasive Plant Pathogen Austropuccinia Psidii on the Australian Environment R
Myrtle Rust reviewed The impacts of the invasive plant pathogen Austropuccinia psidii on the Australian environment R. O. Makinson 2018 DRAFT CRCPLANTbiosecurity CRCPLANTbiosecurity © Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, 2018 ‘Myrtle Rust reviewed: the impacts of the invasive pathogen Austropuccinia psidii on the Australian environment’ is licenced by the Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This Review provides background for the public consultation document ‘Myrtle Rust in Australia – a draft Action Plan’ available at www.apbsf.org.au Author contact details R.O. Makinson1,2 [email protected] 1Bob Makinson Consulting ABN 67 656 298 911 2The Australian Network for Plant Conservation Inc. Cite this publication as: Makinson RO (2018) Myrtle Rust reviewed: the impacts of the invasive pathogen Austropuccinia psidii on the Australian environment. Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra. Front cover: Top: Spotted Gum (Corymbia maculata) infected with Myrtle Rust in glasshouse screening program, Geoff Pegg. Bottom: Melaleuca quinquenervia infected with Myrtle Rust, north-east NSW, Peter Entwistle This project was jointly funded through the Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre and the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program. The Plant Biosecurity CRC is established and supported under the Australian Government Cooperative Research Centres Program. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This review of the environmental impacts of Myrtle Rust in Australia is accompanied by an adjunct document, Myrtle Rust in Australia – a draft Action Plan. The Action Plan was developed in 2018 in consultation with experts, stakeholders and the public. The intent of the draft Action Plan is to provide a guiding framework for a specifically environmental dimension to Australia’s response to Myrtle Rust – that is, the conservation of native biodiversity at risk. -
Native Species Recommended for Planting As Bushtucker
NATIVE SPECIES RECOMMENDED FOR PLANTING AS BUSHTUCKER NOOSA & DISTRICT LANDCARE GROUP STATION STREET, POMONA PH: 5485 2468 ACMENA INGENS Red apple ACMENA SMITHII Creek lilly pilly ACRONYCHIA WILCOXIANA Silver aspen ALECTRYON TOMENTOSA Hairy alectryon ALPINIA CAERULEA Native ginger APHANANTHE PHILIPPINENSIS Rough-leaved elm ARAUCARIA BIDWILLII Bunya pine AUSTROMYRTUS DULCIS Midyim AUSTROMYRTUS HILLII Scaly myrtle BACKHOUSIA CITRIODORA Lemon scented myrtle BRACHYCHITON ACERIFOLIUS Flame tree CAPPARIS ARBOREA Bush caper CAPPARIS SARMENTOSA Scrambling caper CARISSA OVATA Native currant CISSUS ANTARCTICA Native grape CITRUS AUSTRALIS Round Lime DAVIDSONIA PRURIENS Davidson's plum DIANELLA CONGESTA Flax Lily DIPLOGLOTTIS AUSTRALIS Native tamarind DIPLOGLOTTIS CAMPBELLII Small leaf tamarind DRYPETES DEPLANCHEI Yellow tulip ELAEOCARPUS GRANDIS Blue quandong EUGENIA REINWARDTIANA Beach Cherry EUPOMATIA LAURINA Bolwarra EXOCARPUS CUPPRESSIFORMIS Cherry ballart EXOCARPUS LATIFOLIUS Native cherry FICUS CORONATA/FRASERI Sandpaper figs FICUS MACROPHYLLA Moreton bay fig GAHNIA ASPERA Sawsedge LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA Matrush MACADAMIA INTEGRIFOLIA Queensland nut MACADAMIA TETRAPHYLLA Bopple nut MACLURA COCHINCHINENSIS Cockspur Thorn MELODORUM LEICHHARDTII Zig-zag, vine MISCHARYTERA LAUTERERANA Corduroy tamarind PITTOSPORUM MULTIFLORUM Orange thorn PITTOSPORUM SPINESCENS Native lime PLANCHONELLA AUSTRALIS Black apple PLEIOGYNIUM TIMORENSE Burdekin plum PODOCARPUS ELATUS Brown pine STERCULIA QUADRIFIDA Peanut tree SYZYGIUM AUSTRALE Brush cherry SYZYGIUM LUEHMANNII Riberry SYZYGIUM MOOREI Rose apple SYZYGIUM OLEOSUM Blue lilly pilly Australian native plants used as - Bush tucker food - ACACIAS — The gum of Australian species when soaked in water tends to form a jelly-like substance, which can be eaten. However, depending on the amount of tannins in the gum it may be too bitter and astringent for most palates. Pale amber gums are usually more pleasant than those that are a darker red-brown colour. -
5-YEAR REVIEW Short Form Summary Species Reviewed: Pteralyxia Kauaiensis (Kaulu) Curre Nt Classification: Endangered
5-YEAR REVIEW Short Form Summary Species Reviewed: Pteralyxia kauaiensis (kaulu) Curre nt Classification: Endangered Federal Register Notice announcing initiation of this review: [USFWS] U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; initiation of 5-year status reviews of 70 species in Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and the Pacific Islands. Federal Register 73(83):23264- 23266. Lead Region/Field Office: Re gio n 1 /Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, Honolulu, Hawaii Name of Reviewer(s): Marie Bruegmann, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, Plant Recovery Coordinator Marilet A. Zablan, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, Assistant Field Supervisor for Endangered Species Jeff Newman, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, Acting Deputy Field Supervisor Methodology used to complete this 5-year review: This review was conducted by staff of the Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), beginning on April 29, 2008. The review was based on the final critical habitat designation for Pteralyxia kauaiensis and other species from the island of Kauai (USFWS 2003), as well as a review of current, available information. The National Tropical Botanical Garden provided an initial draft of portions of the review and recommendations for conservation actions needed prior to the next five-year review. The evaluation of Samuel Aruch, biological consultant, was reviewed by the P lant Recovery Coordinator. The document was then reviewed by the Assistant Field Supervisor for Endangered Species and Acting Deputy Field Supervisor before submission to the Field Supervisor for approval. Background: For information regarding the species listing history and other facts, please refer to the Fish and Wildlife Service’s Environmental Conservation On-line System (ECOS) database for threatened and endangered species (http://ecos.fws.gov/tess_public). -
Botanical Survey of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park Guam, Mariana Islands
PACIFIC COOPERATIVE STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I AT MĀNOA Dr. David C. Duffy, Unit Leader Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way, St. John #408 Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 Technical Report 161 Botanical survey of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park Guam, Mariana Islands July 2008 Joan M. Yoshioka 1 1 Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit (University of Hawai`i at Mānoa), NPS Inventory and Monitoring Program, Pacific Island Network, PO Box 52, Hawai`i National Park, HI 96718 PCSU is a cooperative program between the University of Hawai`i and U.S. National Park Service, Cooperative Ecological Studies Unit. Organization Contact Information: Inventory and Monitoring Program, Pacific Island Network, PO Box 52, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718, phone: 808-985-6183, fax: 808-985-6111 Recommended Citation: Yoshioka, J. M. 2008. Botanical survey of the War in the Pacific National Historical Park Guam, Mariana Islands. Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit Technical Report 161, University of Hawai`i at Manoa, Department of Botany, Honolulu, HI. Key words: Vegetation types, Vegetation management, Alien species, Endemic species, Checklist, Ferns, Flowering plants Place key words: War in the Pacific National Historical Park, Guam Editor: Clifford W. Morden, PCSU Deputy Director (Mail to: mailto:[email protected]) i Table of Contents List of Tables......................................................................................................iii List of Figures ....................................................................................................iii -
1996-1997 Annual Report (Complete Report)
Australian Broadcasting Corporation annual report 1996–97 oneABC charter The functions and duties which Parliament contents has given to the ABC are set out in the Charter of the Corporation (ss6(1) and (2) of Corporate Profile the Australian Broadcasting Corporation Act 1983). ABC Charter inside cover 6(1) The functions of the Corporation are — One ABC 1 (a) to provide within Australia innovative and comprehensive Significant events 2 broadcasting services of a high standard as part of the ABC Services 4 Australian broadcasting system consisting of national, commercial and community sectors and, without limiting the Financial Summary 5 generality of the foregoing, to provide— ABC Board Members 7 (i) broadcasting programs that contribute to a sense of One ABC Structure 8 national identity and inform and entertain, and reflect the cultural diversity of, the Australian community; and Executive Members 9 (ii) broadcasting programs of an educational nature; Statement by Directors 10 (b) to transmit to countries outside Australia broadcasting Review of Operations 15 programs of news, current affairs, entertainment and cultural enrichment that will— News and Current Affairs 15 (i) encourage awareness of Australia and an international Regional Services 18 understanding of Australian attitudes on world affairs; and Feature (ii) enable Australian citizens living or travelling outside Radio and Television Audiences 24 Australia to obtain information about Australian affairs and National Networks 27 Australian attitudes on world affairs; and Program -
Field Release of the Biological Control Agent Lophodiplosis Trifida Gagné (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) for the Control of Melaleuca Quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T
Field Release of the United States Department of Biological Control Agent Agriculture Marketing and Lophodiplosis trifida Gagné Regulatory Programs (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) for Animal and Plant Health the Control of Melaleuca Inspection Service quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake (Myrtales: Myrtaceae) in the Continental United States Environmental Assessment April 15, 2008 Field Release of the Biological Control Agent Lophodiplosis trifida Gagné (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) for the Control of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S.T. Blake (Myrtales: Myrtaceae) in the Continental United States Environmental Assessment April 15, 2008 Agency Contact: Robert S. Johnson, Branch Chief Permits, Registrations, Imports and Manuals Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Road, Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737–1236 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. This publication reports research involving pesticides. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended.