Environmental Assessment Rangeland Management Plan for the Pagoda Analysis Area

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Assessment Rangeland Management Plan for the Pagoda Analysis Area Environmental United States Assessment Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rangeland Management in the Pagoda Analysis Area August, 2017 Yampa Ranger District, Medicine Bow – Routt National Forests & Thunder Basin National Grassland Routt and Rio Blanco counties, Colorado For more information contact: Doug Myhre Rangeland Management Specialist Yampa Ranger District Telephone: 970-638-4516 Email: [email protected] Environmental Assessment Rangeland Management Plan for the Pagoda Analysis Area Disclaimer: The Forest Service uses the most current and complete data it has available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from sources of differing accuracy, accurate only at certain scales, based on modeling or interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, have represented features not in accurate geographic locations, etc. The Forest Service makes no expressed or implied warranty, including warranty of merchantability and fitness, with respect to the character, function, or capabilities of the data or their appropriateness for any user's purposes. The Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update, modify, or replace this geospatial information based on new inventories, new or revised information, and if necessary in conjunction with other federal, state or local public agencies or the public in general as required by policy or regulation. Previous recipients of the products may not be notified unless required by policy or regulation. For more information, contact the Medicine Bow - Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National Grassland Supervisor's Office (2468 Jackson Street, Laramie, WY 82070, 307- 745-2300). In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD- 3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected] 2 Environmental Assessment Rangeland Management Plan for the Pagoda Analysis Area Table of Contents Summary .................................................................................................. 6 Chapter 1: Purpose and Need .................................................................. 9 1.0 Document Structure .............................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.2 Purpose of Action ................................................................................................................ 11 1.3 Need for Action ................................................................................................................... 12 1.4 Proposed Action .................................................................................................................. 12 1.5 Decision Framework ............................................................................................................ 12 1.6 Public Involvement .............................................................................................................. 13 1.7 Project Area ......................................................................................................................... 13 1.8 Proposed Action Factors ..................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 2: Alternatives, Including the Proposed Action ........................ 16 2.0 Alternatives ......................................................................................................................... 16 2.1 Process Used to Develop the Alternatives .......................................................................... 16 2.2 Alternatives Considered ...................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Alternative 1 – No Grazing (no permitted livestock grazing) .............................................. 16 2.4 Alternative 2 – Current Livestock Grazing Management (numbers and season of livestock use based on the existing term grazing permits and existing allotment management plans) . 17 2.5 Alternative 3 – Adaptive Livestock Grazing Management (Forest Service Proposed Action) ................................................................................................................................................... 22 2.6 Actions Common to Alternatives 2 and 3 ........................................................................... 32 2.7 Project Design Criteria for Alternatives 2 and 3 .................................................................. 32 2.8 Capable and Suitable Acres for Allotments under Alternatives 2 and 3 ............................. 39 2.9 Monitoring Measures for Aternatives 2 and 3 .................................................................... 39 2.10 Comparison of Alternatives ............................................................................................... 43 Chapter 3: Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences .. 44 3.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 44 3 Environmental Assessment Rangeland Management Plan for the Pagoda Analysis Area 3.1 Alternatives and their Response to Factors ........................................................................ 44 3.2 Past, Present and Possible Future Actions .......................................................................... 48 3.3 Rangeland Vegetation ......................................................................................................... 48 3.3 Watershed ........................................................................................................................... 69 3.4 Recreation ........................................................................................................................... 72 3.5 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 73 3.6 Heritage ............................................................................................................................... 76 3.7 Fisheries ............................................................................................................................... 76 3.8 Wildlife ................................................................................................................................ 83 3.9 Social and Economic Resources .......................................................................................... 92 3.10 Botany ............................................................................................................................... 94 Chapter 4—Consultation and Coordination ......................................... 102 4.0 Consultation and Coordination ......................................................................................... 102 4.1 Response to Comments .................................................................................................... 103 4.2 References ......................................................................................................................... 106 4.2 Glossary ............................................................................................................................. 120 Appendices Appendix A—List of Analysis Maps under Alternative 2 (Current Management) Map 1—Beaver Creek S&G Allotment (Alt. 2) Map 2—Beaver Flattops C&G Allotment (Alt. 2) Map 3—Berry Lake S&G Allotment (Alt. 2) Map 4—Indian Run S&G Allotment (Alt. 2) Map 5—Indian Run Wildlife Allotment (Alt. 2) Map 6—Pagoda/Slide S&G Allotment (Alt. 2) Map 7—Pine Creek S&G Allotment (Alt. 2) Map 8— South Fork/Williams Allotment (Alt. 2) Map 9— Wet Park S&G (Alt. 2) 4 Environmental Assessment Rangeland Management Plan for
Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Distribution of an Endogenous Strain of Dahlia Mosaic Virus in Members of Asteraceae Keri L
    Fort Hays State University FHSU Scholars Repository Master's Theses Graduate School Spring 2017 Phylogenetic Distribution Of An Endogenous Strain Of Dahlia Mosaic Virus In Members Of Asteraceae Keri L. Caudle Fort Hays State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Caudle, Keri L., "Phylogenetic Distribution Of An Endogenous Strain Of Dahlia Mosaic Virus In Members Of Asteraceae" (2017). Master's Theses. 2. https://scholars.fhsu.edu/theses/2 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at FHSU Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of FHSU Scholars Repository. PHYLOGENETIC DISTRIBUTION OF AN ENDOGENOUS STRAIN OF DAHLIA MOSAIC VIRUS IN MEMBERS OF ASTERACEAE being A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the Fort Hays State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Keri L. Caudle B.S., Fort Hays State University Date: Approved: Major Advisor Approved: Chair, Graduate Council This thesis is for the Master of Science Degree by Keri L. Caudle has been approved by: Chair, Supervisory Committee Supervisory Committee Supervisory Committee Supervisory Committee Chair, Department of Biological Sciences i ABSTRACT A newly discovered strain of Dahlia mosaic virus (DMV) called DMV-D10 was first observed in Dahlia variabilis in 2008. DMV-D10 does not induce visible symptoms of infection in the host plant, and is classified as an endogenous virus. Endogenous viruses like DMV-D10 have the ability to integrate their viral sequences into the host plant genome, which can be transmitted to offspring.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Vol 3 FC
    PLANTS+ OF THE BLACK RANGE OF NEW MEXICO Volume Three Arranged by english common name This checklist recognizes the plant collecting efforts of Anna Isabel Mulford in the Black Range during 1895. PLANTS+ OF THE BLACK RANGE OF NEW MEXICO An Annotated Checklist Edition One of Volume three This checklist of the plants (including a few lichen and other Black Range website, a search for specimen sheets was non-plant species) of the Black Range of southwestern New conducted; Mexico draws from a variety of sources. It is a work in progress and undoubtedly contains errors. If you encounter ✦ If a specimen sheet from the Black Range was located errors of substantive omission or commission or for the species, an entry noting this was made in the administrative errors (broken or incorrect links, spelling, notes column. The name of the collector and the etc.) please let me know at [email protected] so that general location where the specimen was collected the errors can be corrected in the second edition. Your help was entered in the notes column as a link to the in this manner will be of benefit to the general community. specimen sheet. Such entries are shown in dark blue. Methodology ✦ Species which are not verified for the Black Range are indicated by a light blue “cell filling” in the first cell in This checklist was put together in the following manner: the species row. ✦ A search of the SEINet data base (Arizona & New Mexico Chapters) was conducted to determine the Disclaimers and possible species in the Black Range; Points of Clarification ✦ A preliminary search of the Consortium of North In some cases, you may note that an entry from the Vascular American Lichen Herbaria data base was conducted to Plants of the Gila Wilderness data base has been entered on determine possible species in the Black Range (this the checklist but the initial cell of the species listing is filled work is incomplete); in light blue indicating that the species was not verified for the Black Range following the process described above.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plants for Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
    Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Plant Checklist DRAFT as of 29 November 2005 FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Present in Park Rare Native Field horsetail Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum Present in Park Unknown Native Scouring-rush Polypodiaceae (Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis Present in Park Uncommon Native Brittle bladderfern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Woodsia oregana Present in Park Uncommon Native Oregon woodsia Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Argyrochosma fendleri Present in Park Unknown Native Zigzag fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cheilanthes feei Present in Park Uncommon Native Slender lip fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cryptogramma acrostichoides Present in Park Unknown Native American rockbrake Selaginellaceae (Spikemoss Family) Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella densa Present in Park Rare Native Lesser spikemoss Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella weatherbiana Present in Park Unknown Native Weatherby's clubmoss CONIFERS Cupressaceae (Cypress family) Vascular Plant Pinales Cupressaceae Juniperus scopulorum Present in Park Unknown Native Rocky Mountain juniper Pinaceae (Pine Family) Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies concolor var. concolor Present in Park Rare Native White fir Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Present
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Native Plants for the Santa Fe Landscape
    A Guide to Native Plants for the Santa Fe Landscape Penstemon palmeri Photo by Tracy Neal Santa Fe Native Plant Project Santa Fe Master Gardener Association Santa Fe, New Mexico March 15, 2018 www.sfmga.org Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ii Chapter 1 – Annuals and Biennials ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 2 – Cacti and Succulents ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 3 – Grasses ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 4 – Ground Covers .................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 5 – Perennials......................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 6 – Shrubs .............................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Cedar Breaks National
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 ON THE COVER Peterson’s campion (Silene petersonii), Cedar Breaks National Monument, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Cedar Breaks National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR—2009/173 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 February 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer- reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Wildland Plants, Third Edition James Stubbendieck University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and University of Nebraska Press Chapters 2017 North American Wildland Plants, Third Edition James Stubbendieck University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Stephan L. Hatch Neal M. Bryan Cheryl D. Dunn University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples Stubbendieck, James; Hatch, Stephan L.; Bryan, Neal M.; and Dunn, Cheryl D., "North American Wildland Plants, Third Edition" (2017). University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters. 390. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples/390 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Nebraska Press at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. North American Wildland Plants Th ird Edition Buy the Book James Stubbendieck, Stephan L. Hatch, Neal M. Bryan, and Cheryl D. Dunn North American University of Nebraska Press • Lincoln and London Buy the Book Wildland Plants Third Edition A Field Guide Illustrated by Neal M. Bryan, Angie Fox, Kelly L. Rhodes Hays, Bellamy Parks Jansen, and Debra Meier Maps by Kathleen Lonergan- Orr and Neal M. Bryan Buy the Book © 2017 by the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska. All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Stubbendieck, James L., author. | Hatch, Stephan L., 1945– author. | Bryan, Neal M., author. | Dunn, Cheryl D., author.
    [Show full text]
  • FERNS and FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F
    FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Dittmer, H.J., E.F. Castetter, & O.M. Clark. 1954. The ferns and fern allies of New Mexico. Univ. New Mexico Publ. Biol. No. 6. Family ASPLENIACEAE [1/5/5] Asplenium spleenwort Bennert, W. & G. Fischer. 1993. Biosystematics and evolution of the Asplenium trichomanes complex. Webbia 48:743-760. Wagner, W.H. Jr., R.C. Moran, C.R. Werth. 1993. Aspleniaceae, pp. 228-245. IN: Flora of North America, vol.2. Oxford Univ. Press. palmeri Maxon [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] Palmer’s spleenwort platyneuron (Linnaeus) Britton, Sterns, & Poggenburg [M&H; Wagner & Moran 1993] ebony spleenwort resiliens Kunze [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] black-stem spleenwort septentrionale (Linnaeus) Hoffmann [M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] forked spleenwort trichomanes Linnaeus [Bennert & Fischer 1993; M&H; W&S; Wagner & Moran 1993] maidenhair spleenwort Family AZOLLACEAE [1/1/1] Azolla mosquito-fern Lumpkin, T.A. 1993. Azollaceae, pp. 338-342. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. caroliniana Willdenow : Reports in W&S apparently belong to Azolla mexicana Presl, though Azolla caroliniana is known adjacent to NM near the Texas State line [Lumpkin 1993]. mexicana Schlechtendal & Chamisso ex K. Presl [Lumpkin 1993; M&H] Mexican mosquito-fern Family DENNSTAEDTIACEAE [1/1/1] Pteridium bracken-fern Jacobs, C.A. & J.H. Peck. Pteridium, pp. 201-203. IN: Flora of North America, vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. aquilinum (Linnaeus) Kuhn var. pubescens Underwood [Jacobs & Peck 1993; M&H; W&S] bracken-fern Family DRYOPTERIDACEAE [6/13/13] Athyrium lady-fern Kato, M. 1993. Athyrium, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Valles Caldera National Preserve Land Use History
    More Than a Scenic Mountain Landscape: Valles Caldera National Preserve United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Use History Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-196 September 2007 Kurt F. Anschuetz Thomas Merlan Anschuetz, Kurt F.; Merlan, Thomas. 2007. More than a scenic mountain landscape: Valles Caldera National Preserve land use history. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-196. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 277 p. Abstract This study focuses on the cultural-historical environment of the 88,900-acre (35,560-ha) Valles Caldera National Preserve (VCNP) over the past four centuries of Spanish, Mexican, and U.S. governance. It includes a review and synthesis of available published and unpublished historical, ethnohistorical, and ethnographic literature about the human occupation of the area now contained within the VCNP. Documents include historical maps, texts, letters, diaries, business records, photographs, land and mineral patents, and court testimony. This study presents a cultural-historical framework of VCNP land use that will be useful to land managers and researchers in assessing the historical ecology of the property. It provides VCNP administrators and agents the cultural-historical background needed to develop management plans that acknowledge traditional associations with the Preserve, and offers managers additional background for structuring and acting on consultations with affiliated communities. The Authors Kurt F. Anschuetz, an archaeologist and anthropologist, is the Program Director of the RÍo Grande Foundation for Communities and Cultural Landscapes in Santa Fe, New Mexico. He provides educational opportunities and technical assistance to Indian, Hispanic, and Anglo communities working to sustain their traditional relations with the land, the water, and their cultural heritage resources in the face of rapid development.
    [Show full text]
  • State of NEW MEXICO 2014 Wetland Plant List
    4/2/14 & n s p State of NEW MEXICO 2014 Wetland Plant List Lichvar, R.W., M. Butterw ick, N.C. Melvin, and W.N. Kirchner. 2014. The National Wetland Plant List: 2014 Update of Wetland Ratings. Phytoneuron 2014-41: 1-42. http://wetland_plants.usace.army.mil/ Sisyrinchium demissum Greene (Stif f Blue-Ey ed-Grass) Photo: Lewis E. Epple User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for w etland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or w etter in at least one Corps region. 3) Some state boundaries lie w ithin tw o or more Corps Regions. If a species occurs in one region but not the other, its rating w ill be show n in one column and the other column w ill be BLANK. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1/24 4/2/14 State of NEW MEXICO 2014 Wetland Plant List Total Species = 1506 AW GP WMVC OBL 273 266 266 FACW 337 330 320 FAC 338 329 345 FACU 450 390 430 UPL 100 126 116 Regional Totals 1498 1441 1477 Scientific Name Authorship AW GP WMVC Common Name Abies bifolia A. Murr. FACU FACU Rocky Mountain Alpine Fir Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL UPL FACU Velv etleaf Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FACU Rocky Mountain Maple Acer grandidentatum Nutt. FACU FAC FACU Cany on Maple Acer negundo L. FACW FAC FAC Ash-Leaf Maple Acer saccharinum L. FAC FAC FAC Silv er Maple Achillea millefolium L. FACU FACU FACU Common Yarrow Achnatherum hymenoides (Roemer & J.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants
    Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants June 1, 2011 By Scott Mincemoyer Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT This checklist of Montana vascular plants is organized by Division, Class and Family. Species are listed alphabetically within this hierarchy. Synonyms, if any, are listed below each species and are slightly indented from the main species list. The list is generally composed of species which have been documented in the state and are vouchered by a specimen collection deposited at a recognized herbaria. Additionally, some species are included on the list based on their presence in the state being reported in published and unpublished botanical literature or through data submitted to MTNHP. The checklist is made possible by the contributions of numerous botanists, natural resource professionals and plant enthusiasts throughout Montana’s history. Recent work by Peter Lesica on a revised Flora of Montana (Lesica 2011) has been invaluable for compiling this checklist as has Lavin and Seibert’s “Grasses of Montana” (2011). Additionally, published volumes of the Flora of North America (FNA 1993+) have also proved very beneficial during this process. The taxonomy and nomenclature used in this checklist relies heavily on these previously mentioned resources, but does not strictly follow anyone of them. The Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants can be viewed or downloaded from the Montana Natural Heritage Program’s website at: http://mtnhp.org/plants/default.asp This publication will be updated periodically with more frequent revisions anticipated initially due to the need for further review of the taxonomy and nomenclature of particular taxonomic groups (e.g. Arabis s.l ., Crataegus , Physaria ) and the need to clarify the presence or absence in the state of some species.
    [Show full text]
  • Glide Wildflower Show Locates the Flowers Recent Generic Changes in the Asteraceae: What's in Store for the Oregon Flora Proje
    VOLUME 15 NUMBER 1 OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FEBRUARY 2009 Glide Wildflower Show Locates the Flowers Recent generic changes in the Asteraceae: by Nacy Tague and Dianne Muscarello what’s in store for the Oregon Flora Project? by Kenton L. Chambers "Where does this flower grow?" The botanists at the annual Glide Wildflower Show hear this question many Part I: Tribes Astereae, Cichorieae, Heliantheae, times every year. Visitors fall in love with the striking Senecioneae beauty of the region's abundant wildflowers and dream Editor’s Note: In the large sunflower family, Asteraceae, of finding them on a local hike or in their own backyard. the strongest evidence supporting the new taxonomy is often The Glide Wildflower Show has found a graphic way of derived from cladistic analysis of data from DNA-based answering this question, thanks to the Oregon Flora Project. molecular research. We thank Dr. Chambers for synthesizing The seed for the idea was planted in 2006. That year a this latest information here for our Newsletter readers. local presenter used Oregon Flora Project Plant Atlas maps The role of the Oregon Flora Project Checklist is to to indicate wildflower locations. A couple of Glide Show present an accepted name and synonyms for each plant volunteers attending the talk observed, "Wouldn't it be cool in the state, based on our current understanding of the if maps like these could be displayed with the plants in our relationships among taxa. This knowledge is derived from show?" experimental science, as well as from the traditional use of The show's Council liked the idea, and the two volunteers field studies and herbarium collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Senator Beck Basin Long-Term Vegetation Study 2009 Re-Survey Final Report Presented to the Center for Snow and Avalanche Studies, Silverton, Colorado
    Senator Beck Basin Long-term Vegetation Study 2009 Re-Survey Final Report Presented to the Center for Snow and Avalanche Studies, Silverton, Colorado January 2010 by Julie A. Crawford, PhD Contract Ecologist 336 North Main Street Mancos, CO 81328 970-533-7646 [email protected] Abstract Climate greatly influences vegetation composition, abundance, and distribution. Predicted climate change in the Rocky Mountains of the western United States may lead to the reduction of snow pack and stream flow, and increase land surface drying. These events, as well as the movement of plant species upslope in response to warming, and the reduction of endemic species at the exterior of their ranges have already been documented. In southwest Colorado, there have been overall increases in mean temperature and decreases in total precipitation over the last century. In addition to the impact of these long-term trends, vegetation also has an immediate response to short-term fluctuations in water availability. Repeated measures of permanently placed vegetation plots can show the impacts of both long- and short-term climate patterns on vegetation. In 2004, a long-term vegetation study was initiated in Senator Beck Basin in the San Juan Mountains of southwestern Colorado. These permanent vegetation transects were read again in 2009 and a comparison of the two readings is presented here. Results show a significant difference in the vegetation of the basin in the five-year period since initial transect set-up. An additional 39 species were recorded from the transects in 2009, while 26 species found in 2004 were not recorded in 2009.
    [Show full text]