Chapter 7 Background Data: Merced Regional Airport and Environs
Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
7
Background Data: Merced Regional Airport and Environs
OVERVIEW Merced Regional Airport/Macready Field is located in the City of Merced approximately 2.5 miles southwest of the city center. The airport is owned and operated by the City of Merced. The airport was built in 1928 and has historically been used for commercial and general aviation. Merced Regional Airport is the only airport in the County currently offering commercial airline service.
EXISTING AIRFIELD SYSTEM Merced Regional Airport encompasses 450 acres and has a single paved runway (Runway 12-30) 5,914 feet long and 150 feet wide. It is designated as an Airport Reference Code (ARC) 1 C-III facility that can accommodate aircraft with wingspans of up to 118 feet (e.g., Boeing 737-700). The runway is oriented in a northwest/southeast direction. The original airfield system included a crosswind runway (designated 6-24) that has since been abandoned. Runway 30 is equipped with straight-in precision instrument approach capabilities providing visibility minimums of ½ statute mile. Runway 12 has nonprecision instrument approach procedures with visibility minimums of 1 statute mile. The size of the RPZ at each runway end is a function of the type of aircraft and approach visibility minimum associated with that runway end. The dimensions of the existing RPZ for Runway 30 are: 1,000 foot inner width, 1,750 foot outer width and a length of 2,500 feet. Approximately 75% of the existing RPZ is on airport. The portion of the RPZ located off-airport is covered by existing and future easements. The dimensions of the existing RPZ for Runway 12 are: 500 feet inner width, 1,010 feet outer width and a length of 1,700 feet. The Runway 12 RPZ is nearly all on airport.
1 Airport Reference Code (ARC) is a coding system defined by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to relate airport design criteria to the operation and physical characteristics of the airplanes intended to operate at an airport.
Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Adopted June 21, 2012) 7–1 CHAPTER 7 BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS
AIRPORT PLANS
Airport Master Plan Status The City of Merced adopted the Master Plan and Airport Layout Plan (ALP) for Merced Regional Airport in December 2007. The purpose of the plan was to determine the extent, type and schedule of development needed to accommodate future aviation demand at the airport. The principal change proposed for the airfield includes extending Runway 12-30 to the southeast by approximately 550 feet for a future runway length of some 6,460 feet. Likewise, the RPZ shifts southeast encompassing approximately 30 acres of private lands. An avigation easement is proposed for this area. Pertinent data regarding the airport is summarized in Exhibit MER 1 . A copy of the 2007 ALP is provided in Exhibit MER 2 .
Basis of Merced Regional Airport ALUCP Since the 2007 ALP is from the recently adopted Master Plan, state law does not require that it be submitted to California Division of Aeronautics for acceptance. Nevertheless, the 2007 ALP was submitted to and accepted by the California Division of Aeronautics as the basis of the Merced Regional Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan on April 2011.
Airspace Plan The 2007 Airspace Plan for Merced Regional Airport depicts the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77 imaginary surfaces for the airport’s single runway, Runway 12-30 (see Chapter 2, Map MER 2). The airspace surfaces reflect the ultimate runway length of 6,450 feet, an existing precision instrument approach to Runway 30 and an existing nonprecision approach to Runway 12.
AIRCRAFT ACTIVITY DATA
Existing Activity Merced Regional Airport is a commercial service airport, although it primarily serves general aviation aircraft. Current activity at Merced Regional consists primarily of touch-and-goes, as well as commercial and cargo activity. Scheduled airline service is provided by Great Lakes Airlines and consists of two daily commercial flights to and from Las Vegas and Los Angeles. The airline flies a 19-passenger Beech 1900 turboprop aircraft. Conversations with airport management indicate these flights are near capacity, and there is discussion of adding flights to another destination, possibly southern California (Ontario). Cargo service at the airport is provided by Ameriflight, a feeder cargo airline for the UPS Oakland regional hub. Ameriflight provides 12 departures per week (two on each weekday and one on each weekend day). Ameriflight flies Beech C99 turboprop aircraft. Current aircraft activity is estimated at approximately 53,300 annual operations. Military operations are primarily large twin turboprop aircraft, such as C130 transports, practicing instrument approaches at the airport.
7–2 Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Adopted June 21, 2012) BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS CHAPTER 7
Activity Forecast The recently adopted 2007 Master Plan provides three forecast scenarios for year 2026 which uses base year 2004 data of 84,204 annual operations. The forecast assumptions for each scenario are noted below. Low Demand. The low demand scenario projects some 91,300 annual operations (0.4% average annual growth rate). It assumes that Merced Regional’s future air cargo role will remain as a feeder to a regional hub and that the airline fleet and passenger loads will remain constant over the forecast period. Baseline. The baseline forecast, which was selected as the preferred Master Plan forecast, projects some 110,400 annual operations (1.2% average annual growth rate). This scenario predicts that larger regional jet or turboprop aircraft (25-seats) will enter the fleet and will account for 20% of operations by 2026. High Demand. The high demand scenario estimates 134,100 annual operations (2.1% average annual growth rate). Like the baseline forecast, the high demand forecast assumes that larger regional jet or turboprop aircraft will enter the fleet by 2026. All three forecast scenarios assume that future general aviation activity will be driven predominantly by increases in based aircraft. The percent distribution of operations between local and itinerant is assumed to remain constant over the forecast period. Military aircraft operations are expected to remain relatively constant. The Master Plan’s preferred forecast of 110,400 annual operations is reasonable for long-range airport land use planning purpose. As such, the preferred forecast is carried forward to 2035 and is used as the basis of the Merced Regional Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Exhibit MER 3 summarizes existing and future aircraft activity data for the Merced Regional Airport. Exhibit MER 4 depicts the noise contours and other aeronautical factors upon which the compatibility zones for the airport are based.
Airport Environs Exhibit MER 5 shows a detailed summary of Merced Regional Airport’s existing (2010) and planned environs, including airport compatibility policies adopted by the local agencies (City of Merced and Merced County). The existing land use, planned land use, and zoning maps for each agency are provided in Exhibits MER 6 –Existing Land Uses, MER 7 –General Plan Land Uses, and MER 8 –Zoning Designations. An aerial photo of the airport is provided in Exhibit MER 9. As shown in the exhibits, the airport is currently surrounded by urban development to the north, east, and southeast, and agriculture to the west and south. There are also scattered rural residences and a small residential subdivision located within one mile of Runway 12. The adopted airport land use compatibility zones cover land under the jurisdiction of the City of Merced and Merced County. The local planning efforts by these agencies are summarized below.
City of Merced On January 3, 2012, the City of Merced adopted the Merced Vision 2030 General Plan to replace its 1997 General Plan . The majority of the airport-related policies in the 2030 General Plan are focused on Merced Regional Airport, as the Airport is owned and operated by the City. The plan also includes several policies regarding the Castle Airport given its proximity to the city.
Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Adopted June 21, 2012) 7–3 CHAPTER 7 BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS
The City’s General Plan includes policies that require any development near Merced Regional Airport to be consistent with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The plan also includes policies to protect the airport from incompatible uses, discourage residential development in clear zones, reduce noise impacts from the airport on surrounding uses, protect approach areas and control zones for both existing and future runway systems through land use regulations and property acquisition, and prevent the encroachment of potential hazards to flights within the airport's airspace.In addition, the City’s Zoning Ordinance restricts the height of structures within two miles of the airport.
Merced County Merced County is in the process of updating the 1990 General Plan. The updated plan, called the 2030 General Plan, is scheduled for adoption in early 2012. The County is not anticipating any changes to existing land use designations near the airport as part of this update. The 1990 General Plan includes goals and policies that require projects to be compatible with the ALUC Policy Plan. The draft 2030 General Plan, in addition to requiring projects to be compatible with the ALUC Policy Plan, also includes goals and policies that will prevent incompatible land uses within airport safety areas, require any development near airports to be consistent with FAA regulations, and prohibit noise-sensitive land uses near public and private airports.
7–4 Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Adopted June 21, 2012) BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS CHAPTER 7
This page intentionally blank
Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Adopted June 21, 2012) 7–5 CHAPTER 7 BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS
GENERAL INFORMATION TRAFFIC PATTERNS AND APPROACH PROCEDURES Airport Ownership – City of Merced Runway 12-30 Property size Airplane Traffic Pattern Fee title: 450 acres Right traffic on Runway 12 Avigation easements: 26 acres Pattern altitude – 1,000 feet AGL (light aircraft); 1,500 AGL (heavy aircraft) Airport Classification – Commercial Service Instrument Approaches Airport Elevation — 155 feet MSL(surveyed) Runway 12 Localizer Back Course: nonprecision straight-in Access (1 mile visibility, 520-ft. min. descent height) Via V Street and Grogan Avenue from State Highway 99 Runway 12 GPS: nonprecision straight-in (1-mile visibility, 1.5 miles from Highway 99; 2 miles from central Merced 520 ft. minimum descent height) Runway 30 ILS: precision ( ½ mi. visibility, 355 ft. min. RUNWAY SYSTEM descent height); missed approach turns west Runway 12-30 Runway 30 GPS: nonprecision ( ¾-mile visibility, 449 ft. minimum descent height); approach course aligned 14° right Critical Aircraft — Boeing 737 (east) of runway alignment; missed approach turns west Classification — Airport Reference Code C-III Runway 30 VOR: nonprecision straight-in (¾ mile Dimensions — 5,914 feet long; 150 feet wide visibility, 560 ft. min descent height ); missed approach Pavement Strength — 30,000 lbs for aircraft with single- turns west wheel main landing gear; 100,000 lbs dual-wheel; 155,000 Visual Navigational Aids dual tandem wheel Runway 12: REILS, VASI (3.0 °) Average Gradient —Less than 0.1% Runway 30: MALSR, 4-light PAPI (3.0 °) Lighting — High-intensity edge lighting Noise Abatement Procedures Primary Taxiways — Full length parallel on northeast Avoid overflight of city at altitudes of less than 3,000 MSL Helicopter Traffic Pattern – None APPROACH PROTECTION Runway 12-30 PROPOSED FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS Runway Protection Zones Runway/Taxiway System Runway 12: 1,700 feet long; nearly all on airport Extend runway and taxiway 547 feet east Runway 30: 2,500 feet long; about 75% on airport Relocate parallel taxiway 50 feet northeast property Approach Protection Approach Obstacles Additional property acquisition (9.5 acres) for extended RSA Runway 12: 20-foot pole, 800 feet from runway, 225 feet and OFA left of centerline, 30:1 to clear Acquire avigation easements for future RPZ (29.7 acres) Runway 30: power line 1,800 feet from runway 650 left located off-airport of centerline, 38:1 to clear Building Area Sites provided for new terminal building, additional hangars, BUILDING AREA nonaviation commercial development Location – Northeast side of runway Aircraft Parking Capacity AIRPORT PLANNING Hangar spaces for 60 aircraft Airport Plan Documents Approximately 86 tiedown spaces on apron(incl. FBO area Airport Master Plan adopted September 2007 and transient aircraft spaces) Airport Layout Plan approved by Federal Aviation Services Administration September 2007 Maintenance, supplies, aircraft rental, charter, instruction, car rental Fuel (aviation gasoline and jet fuel) Airport has had commuter airline service Other Major Facilities Airline terminal building Air traffic control tower (not in use) Two fixed base operators Exhibit MER 1 Airport café Airport Features Information Source: Data compiled by Mead & Hunt, Inc. (July 2010) Merced Regional Airport
7-6 Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Adopted June 21, 2012) BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS CHAPTER 7
EXISTING NON-STANDARD CONDITIONS RUNWAY END DATA BUILDING TABLE LEGEND DESCRIPTION REQUIRED EXISTING ACTION RUNWAY EXISTING ULTIMATE TOP DESCRIPTION EXISTING ULTIMATE RUNWAY SAFETY AREA 1,000' 932' RECENTLY IMPROVED AS PART OF AIP 3-06-0152-11 LATITUDE 1 SAME # DESCRIPTION ELEVATION AIRPORT BOUNDARY A RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA 1,000' 699' APPLY FOR MODIFICATION TO STANDARDS 12 LONGITUDE : SAME 1 TERMINAL 172' AIRFIELD PAVEMENT 30.5:1 FAA GRANTED WAIVER 6/11/73 ELEVATION 154.8' SAME 2 PILOT'S LOUNGE 164' AIRFIELD PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED NONE B FAR PART 77 APPROACH SURFACE 50:1 CLEAR CLEAR POWER POLES TO BE PLACED UNDERGROUND LATITUDE 1 1 3 HANGARS 163' TO 180' BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE (BRL) RUNWAY CENTERLINE TO TAXIWAY 30 LONGITUDE : : 4 ATCT (Pending Reactivation) 215' RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA (ROFA) C 400' 350' RELOCATE TAXIWAY A CENTERLINE SEPARATION ELEVATION 155.4' 154.7' 5 FUEL ISLAND 164' RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (RSA) 6 AIRPORT MAINTENANCE FACILITY 160' OBSTACLE FREE ZONE (OFZ) 7 RESTAURANT 165' BUILDINGS 8 FUTURE TERMINAL 174' BUILDINGS TO BE REMOVED NONE 9 FUTURE PILOT'S LOUNGE 169' GROUND CONTOURS 995' SAME 10 FUTURE FBO HANGARS 189' AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT (ARP) 11 FUTURE CORPORATE HANGARS 189' TO 190' RUNWAY PROTECTION ZONE EASEMENT 12 FUTURE INDVIDUAL HANGARS 169' TO 170' LAND TO BE ACQUIRED IN FEE NONE 13 CITY FIRE STATION (SEE NOTE 5) 175 THRESHOLD SITING SURFACE RUNWAY LIGHTS FENCE SAME
C T IO E N S 26 35 SECTION CORNER 27 SAME 400' 200' 0 400' 800' C 34 O R NER
GRAPHIC SCALE
RUNWAY DATA RUNWAY 12 - 30 FAA APPROVAL DESCRIPTION EXISTING ULTIMATE EFFECTIVE GRADIENT (IN %) 0.02 0.00 MAXIMUM GRADIENT (IN %) 0.67 SAME WIND COVERAGE % (16 KNOTS) 99.96 SAME APPROACH VISIBILITY MINIMUMS 1 MI (12)/ò MI (30) SAME MAKE AND MODEL B737-700 SAME WINGSPAN (FEET) 117.4 SAME DESIGN UNDERCARRIAGE WIDTH 18.75 SAME AIRCRAFT APPROACH SPEED (KNOTS) 130 SAME WIND ROSES MAX. TAKEOFF WEIGHT (LBS) 154,500 SAME
ABBREVIATIONS RUNWAY MARKING PRECISION SAME
12 ARP Airport Reference Point HOLD LINE DETAIL 12 APPROACH CATEGORY RUNWAY 12 NON-PRECISION SAME
ASOS Automatic Surface Observation Station
20 Knots 20 Knots 20 20 Knots 20 (FAR PART 77) RUNWAY 30 PRECISION SAME
N N
16 Knots 16 Knots 16 ASR Airport Surveillance Radar Knots 16
NNE NNE RUNWAY ȭ TO PARALLEL TAXIWAY ȭ 350' 400'
13 Knots 13 Knots 13 360 Knots 13 360
ATCT Air Traffic Control Tower NNW 350 10 NNW 350 10 10.5 Knots 10.5 Knots 10.5 20 Knots 10.5 20 340 340 TAXIWAY ȭ TO FIXED OR MOVABLE OBJECT 93' SAME BRL Building Restriction Line 30 30 330 330 28 28 TAXIWAY OBJECT FREE AREA WIDTH 186' SAME NE NE (E) Existing 27 40 27 40 NW 320 NW 320 El. Elevation + TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA WIDTH 118' SAME 22 50 22 50 Est. Estimate 310 + 21 310 21 TAXIWAY WINGTIP CLEARANCE 34' SAME + + AIRPORT DATA + 60 60 + 17 17 RUNWAY TOUCHDOWN ZONE (TDZ) 155 (12)/156 (30) SAME (F) Future 300 .1 300 + 16 ENE 16 ENE DESCRIPTION EXISTING ULTIMATE .2 LAT. Latitude .3 + + ELEVATIONS HIGH POINT 155.5' SAME WNW + .1 .8 + 70 WNW .1 70 AIRPORT ELEVATION (MSL) 156' SAME 1.4 11 + .1 11 290 1.8 290 .3 LONG. Longitude + 10 10 (NAVD 88) LOW POINT 154.7' SAME 1.0 KNOTS .1 KNOTS AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT LATITUDE 1 1 MALSR Medium Intensity Approach Light System with .4 80 .1 80 LINE OF SIGHT REQUIREMENT MET YES SAME 280 .1 + 280 (ARP) COORDINATES (NAD 83) LONGITUDE : : Runway Alignmnet Indicator Lights + + + + RUNWAY LENGTH 5,903' 6,450' 0-10 Kts 0-10 Kts VOR, ILS, ASR, VOR, ILS, ASR, MSL Mean Sea Level + .1 + .1 W 90 E W 90 E 270 90.9% 270 98.0% RUNWAY WIDTH 150' SAME .1 + + + NAVAIDS (ILS, BEACON, ALS) BEACON, VASI, BEACON, VASI, OFZ Obstacle Free Zone + + 260 .1 .1 260 + .1 RUNWAY/TAXIWAY PAVEMENT MATERIAL ASPHALT SAME + + + REIL, MALSR REIL Runway End Identification Lights .1 .3 100 + .1 100 + + .6 + .2 APPROACH SLOPE 34:1 (12)/50:1 (30) SAME ROFA Runway Object Free Area + .1 + MEAN MAX. TEMP. OF HOTTEST MONTH -XO\ SAME 250 + .4 250 .3 + .2 + .1 PAVEMENT STRENGTH (S/D/DT) (000 LBS) 30/100/140 SAME WSW + .2 + WSW .1 + .1 110 110 RPZ Runway Protection Zone NOTES: + + + + AIRPORT REFERENCE CODE C-III SAME .1 .1 + ESE + ESE RUNWAY LIGHTING HIRL SAME RSA Runway Safety Area 1. California Coordinate System, Zone 3 NAD 83. 240 + 240 GPS AT AIRPORT YES SAME + + + + 120 .1 120 RWY Runway 2. All elevations are in NAVD 88. + NAVIGATIONAL AIDS SAME 230 + 230 RUNWAY 12 VASI, REIL SAME TDZE Touch Down Zone Elevation 3. Threshold Siting Surfaces are shown in plan and profile view on + + 130 130 + VISUAL AIDS Sheets 4 and 5. Penetrations to the Threshold Siting Surface are SW 220 SW 220 WIND DATA RUNWAY 30 MALSR SAME TWY Taxiway 140 SE 140 SE noted on Sheets 4 and 5. 210 210 ALL WEATHER IFR VASI Visual Approach Slope Indicator 150 150 /(1*7+ï 1,000' SAME 200 200 RUNWAY SAFETY AREA 4. City owned portable hangars will be moved to an intermediate 160 160 190 12 Miles per Hour 190 12 Miles per Hour CROSSWIND COVERAGE CROSSWIND COVERAGE WIDTH 500' SAME SSW 180 170 SSW 180 170 The preparation of this plan was financed in part through a planning grant from the location and phased out throughout the 20-year planning period. SSE 15 Miles per Hour SSE 15 Miles per Hour S 18 Miles per Hour S 18 Miles per Hour RUNWAY 10.5 Kts. 13 Kts. 16 Kts. 20 Kts. 10.5 Kts. 13 Kts. 16 Kts. 20 Kts. /(1*7+ï 1,000' SAME Federal Aviation Administration as provided under Section 505 of the Airport and Privately owned hangars will be relocated adjacent to Condor Drive RUNWAY OBJECT FREE AREA 23 Miles per Hour 23 Miles per Hour 12 36.74% 36.78% 36.80% 36.81% 71.81% 71.84% 71.86% 71.86% WIDTH 800' SAME Airway Improvement Act of 1982, as amended. The contents do not necessarily reflect and the ASR. 30 30 30 79.14% 79.34% 79.48% 79.51% 60.23% 60.31% 60.36% 60.36% /(1*7+ï 200' SAME the official views or policy of the FAA. Acceptance of this plan by the FAA does not in 5. The City Fire Station is on airport property and provides fire OBSTACLE FREE ZONE 12-30 99.56% 99.80% 99.96% 100.00% 99.81% 99.93% 100.00% 100.00% WIDTH 400' SAME any way constitute a commitment on the part of the United States to participate in any protection for the city and has direct access to provide fire protection Based on 46,652 observations between 1999 through 2004 taken at Merced Municipal Airport. Source: National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC. development depicted therein nor does it indicate that the proposed development is on the airport. RUNWAY CENTERLINE TO HOLD LINE 250' SAME environmentally acceptable in accordance with appropriate public laws. 6. There are no runway end survey monuments. ALL WEATHER IFR Note: IFR conditions occur 10.9% of the time ï/HQJWKIURPUXQZD\HQG This is a reduced version of a large size drawing. Exhibit MER 2 C:\Users\870tme\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_2376\MER ALUP Merced-ALP.dwg Aug 19, 2011 - 9:44am Airport Layout Plan BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS CHAPTER 7
This page intentionally blank
Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Adopted June 21, 2012) 7–7 CHAPTER 7 BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS
BASED AIRCRAFT a a b RUNWAY USE DISTRIBUTION Current Future Current Future Aircraft Type All Aircraft Single Engine 75 142 Takeoffs Multi Engine 6 17 Runway 12 5% No Jet 0 14 Runway 30 95% Change Helicopter 0 2 Landings Other 0 5 Runway 12 5% No Total 81 180 Runway 30 95% Change
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS FLIGHT TRACK DISTRIBUTION d Current a Future b Total Current Future Annual 53,000 110,400 All Aircraft Average Day 145 302 Takeoffs, Runway 12 Peak Hour 44 (avg. day, peak month) Straight Out 50% 45 ° Left Turn 25% No Distribution by Aircraft Type Pattern 25% Change Single Engine 67% 71% Multi-Engine 22% 13% Takeoffs, Runway 30 Turboprop c 6% 0% Business Jet 1% 6% Straight Out 50% Regional Jet (airline) 0% 8% 45 ° Left Turn 25% No Helicopter 3% <1% Pattern 25% Change Military 1% <1% Distribution by Type of Operation b Landings, Runway 12 Local Straight-in 25% No (incl. touch-and-goes) 78% 70% Pattern 75% Change Itinerant 22% 30% Landings, Runway 30
Straight-in 25% No TIME OF DAY DISTRIBUTION a b Pattern 75% Change Current Future
All Aircraft
Day 90% 88%
Evening 7% 11%
Night 3% 1%
Notes: a Source: Airport management (July 2010). b Source: Merced Municipal Airport Master Plan (September 2007). Future projections in Master Plan are for 2026. A review of
the “baseline” forecast indicates that the numbers are reasonable for long-range airport land use planning purposes. The Master Plan forecast is carried forward to 2035 for airport land use planning purposes. c Existing turboprop activity includes scheduled air carrier service by Beechcraft 1900D and Embraer EMB-120 Brasilia aircraft. d Source: 1999 Merced County ALUCP. Flight patterns are expected to remain constant.
Data compiled by Mead & Hunt, Inc. (August 2010)
Exhibit MER 3 Airport Activity Data Merced Regional Airport
7-8 Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Adopted June 21, 2012) C:\Users\870tme\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_8308\MER ALUP Merced-Compatability.dwg Jul 05, 2012 - 2:35pm Prepared By: Unincorporated Merced County Unincorporated Merced County www.meadhunt.com C D B2 B1 C
D
C 12 A
30 75 dB CNEL 70 dB CNEL 65 dB CNEL B1 60 dB CNEL D B2 Castle Airport Airport Influence Area C City of Merced Unincorporated Merced County 0 5,000' FEET BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS 10,000' 1. Efficient Use, and Preservation of Navigable Airspace (January Noise contours reflect forecast of 110,400 annual operations by x x published by California Department of Transportation, Division 2011). accident points in 20% increments. one occurs. The contours represent highest concentration of depict where an aircraft accident is most likely to happen when 2. 2035. Compatibility Zone Delineation Compatibility Zone Factors Boundary Lines Legend 4. 3. Aeronautics (October 2011). The accident distribution contours Notes precision instrument approach to Runway 30, proximity of pattern east of airfield, low flying aircraft using straight-in regional jet or turboprop aircraft (25-seats), lack of traffic used to develop zone boundaries. Castle Airport to northeast and existing urban development Compatibility zones represent a composite of noise, east of airport. overflight, safety and airspace impacts. See Chapter 3, Source: Mead & Hunt, Inc. based on input from airport staff. Source: Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77, Safe, Source: California Airport Land Use Planning Handbook Source: Merced Regional Airport Master Plan (Sept. 2009). 550-foot runway extension to southeast, future activity by Airport-specific considerations include: protection of future Table 3A, Compatibility Zone Factors, for general concepts Compatibility Factors Map General Aircraft Traffic Pattern Envelope Notification Surface FAR Part 77, Subpart B, FAA Height Imaginary Surfaces FAR Part 77, Subpart C, Outer Departure Accident Risk Contours Arrival Accident Risk Contours CNEL Noise Contours Object Free Area (OFA) Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Airport Influence Area Future Runway (6,450 ft. length) Existing Runway (5,903 ft. length) Airport Property Line City Limits Merced Regional Airport 3 3 1 1 2 1 Exhibit MER 4 2 CHAPTER 7 4 BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS CHAPTER 7
This page intentionally blank
Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Adopted June 21, 2012) 7–9 CHAPTER 7 BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS
AIRPORT LOCATION AND NEARBY TOPOGRAPHY ESTABLISHED COMPATIBILITY MEASURES Location City of Merced Zoning Ordinance In city of Merced, 2.5 miles southwest of city center Limits heights of structures within two miles of airport Topography [based upon old FAR Par 77 criteria] Situated on floor of San Joaquin Valley; no major high City of Merced Vision 2030 General Plan terrain in vicinity Policy UE-1.1c: Requires any development near Merced Regional Airport to be consistent with the Airport Land EXISTING AIRPORT AREA LAND USES Use Compatibility Plan. General Character Policies T-3.1: Protects Merced Regional Airport from Urban development to the north, east, and southeast incompatible uses. Agricultural land to the west and south Policy OS-4.1d: Discourages residential development in Merced Regional Airport clear zones. Runway Approaches Policy N-1.1 and N-1.4c: Reduce noise impacts from Northwest (Rwy 12): crop lands with scattered rural Merced Regional Airport. residences; small subdivision 1.0 mile from runway end Policy N-1.4b: Encourages Merced County ALUC to update Southeast (Rwy 30): crop lands with widely scattered the ALUCP and require stringent noise reduction rural residences standards. Traffic Pattern Policy: S-5.1: Protects approach areas and control zones Crop lands with widely scattered rural residences for both existing and future runway systems through land use regulations and property acquisition. STATUS OF LOCAL AGENCY PLANS Policy: S-5.2: Prevents the encroachment of potential City of Merced hazards to flights within the Airport's airspace. Current General Plan, Merced Vision 2030, was adopted Policies S-5.1d and T-3.1.d: Work with the County of in January 2012 Merced on land use and master planning issues in the vicinity of Castle Airport and its Land Use Compatibility Merced County Zones. 2000 General Plan adopted December 1990 General Plan currently undergoing update; 2030 General 1990 Merced County General Plan Plan (draft) prepared August 2011 with anticipated Goal 9, Policy 10: Requires projects to be compatible with adoption early 2012 the Airport Land Use Commission Policy Plan or other adopted ALUC Plan.
AIRPORT ENVIRONS AND LAND USE JURISDICTIONS 2030 Merced County General Plan (draft) Policies CIR-6.1 through 6.8: Prevents incompatible land City of Merced uses within airport safety areas, and requires new Airport property and RPZs within city limits projects to be consistent with the Airport Land Use Merced County Compatibility Plan. Runway approaches and traffic pattern over Policies HS-4.1 and HS-4.2: Requires any development unincorporated county land near airports to be consistent with the Airport Land Use City of Atwater Compatibility Plan and FAA regulations. City limits > 1.5 miles from airport influence area Policy HS-7.10: Prohibits noise-sensitive land uses near public and private airports. PLANNED AIRPORT AREA LAND USES City of Merced General Plan Incorporated areas include industrial in immediate vicinity; business park, commercial and residential uses to the east. Within sphere of influence, Industrial Reserve is planned west of Airport and Residential Reserve is planned northeast of Airport. Merced County Unincorporated areas outside SUDP boundaries to remain in agricultural uses
Data compiled by Mead & Hunt and Mintier Harnish (2011)
Exhibit MER 5 Airport Environs Table Merced Regional Airport
7-10 Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (Adopted June 21, 2012 ) BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS CHAPTER 7
E A
Y
L N C T BR M LINTON SAGEWOOD A
S OA H O
T D U W W C SUMMERGLEN
A N MONACO A Y R G RA I PETTINOTTI Legend R
SILVA H U DESTINY I E LR A AVENUE ONE Castle Airport
A
U O O D CO A F LACAVA
M D B H O A ME F AVIGNON R
F T D R A R E C T A I Airport Influence Area DU Airport Influence Area E W M LEHIGH E G N N E
A P R N AUPS
E R P N I T EN DUNN K E A D R SA N BELCHER C CO H R BELCHER RM
I E O N RA A D R D NT W
S R O
L I E I C T N U S
T T A E K
N D S
A
N O R I KE
N Y
S W R T I I U FAA Height Notification Surface
G O L R O I ORION UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY O O G
D I A L
T J E R V P H
T
S
N N L A SOHAN O E P
C S
L 1
R N I A
O O S
N ACIFIC T K U P A P U ATLANTIC
M D E
A O Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones
S A
D I
L G
I
K E
H City of Atwater P N S U PART RIDGE H
A A
U R
V E
A
A I N
A C
U
D
M L T D
S O A
O R
Q
R N E
A B YOSEMITE City Limits E YOSEMITE A C O M
N S E DAN WARD A Y I E O D PEBBLE BEACH V G JUNIPERO L DOE G
U TUPELO P
S S
Y N E M T E A L N L CATALINA A A A H V O
I R A L E A L
O I E O R L R D N M O NEE O D AHWAH LEGENDS L N R L D R S
L T
L H Atwater Sphere of Influence P I O O E O I R A T R A A A I O A G
BEA T N
E
C A R P V LA E OL K N J O V I LA T F S
A A I DONNA SILVERADO R IC FIR Z H A F H C L O S
N Y
N
B
E E S U T W M C M S T P A PINEHURST N H S M MIRROR LAKE N R A U
& A AREA I N R N I A
P A G N BUENA VISTA S IN P
L E
I A T E A B R
D T A E EL PORTAL
K D
G M R EO VERDE H PAS
H
O F
M A 99 N LOBO E
C
O Merced Sphere of Influence
O
A MULBERRY C
E
A Y ANTLE COLUMBIA N
}þ F S B
·| N R R UGH OO W LOUGHBORO K A N DAL H F L B E U SPLIT OAK MENDES F N ROOK H D N A L S T E N U O R A
N
9 S A K U
C E E
D B E 5
R Community Boundaries
A W N W F
E
N
S
A Y E K R IN L I E W I
E
E
E E
O
I
R
E A E L N
E
T N
O E LLIOTT F N E FRANKLIN - BEACHWOOD I TEAK
R E L
B R
R H L
S
O A LEES DAYNA L U Y
K
E
C D J O
L D C S
U
OLIVE I XFORD R O C W Runway C I
A
R A
S D A
I OO EW W LIV V O Y A A
E NEVES L SH CABOT G D B C O P
B E U O IR H Y W P A NOA B
D J H L
K T E I
A GAIL COOPER R A B Y O EMERALD Roads N R
K ESSEX C
R R
S ALEXANDER E 9 W E IL I L G 9 OW RAMBLER O B M K L R
T B OO K P F R Y F HANSEN N A B CARDIF
I I O D E C F W 2 R 4 G
F E
U G
A E LANDRAM R TH CRAIG E Existing Land Use, 2010
A
L JAKE A B Q S N E
D
A M
N N P
T F
I
V N I
2 A L Q I L W 3 P ARDEN
A H T E
I R MILES T Agriculture
K D O
E S L SOUTH BEAR CREEK BEAR CREEK
S
N
W 2 I A 2 JOSIE N N 1 ORT L H D I B SHADOW BROOK U S 2N EAR CREEK T R O
E MORAN A D K
O R
L City of Merced
O
M
O R N O 2
L F
F 1 T 1 N O O Single-Family Residential O T 6 S S 2 S T T 25 7 K S F C S C H I T C T H C H A I L D T N R A
D LUCILLE R 2 J HARNISCH 4 R
V H Q A T H H R N A E
O R M 1 H H E 9 T A T A T N 3 T ASTI O
B2 R O I T E Multi-Family Residential N H G N 6 O 8 T O A T U 0 ELIZABETH S QUEEN N B
F G M O
A R V C 1 O
S O A 2 LEC T ROGINA D CO V 2 D
R M A I N P N G
I A P 2 S
M A ICKERING 0 D P A 27TH E N N T N M E A I
R S
I H E
Y T R 18 A E Commercial O P
P T
L S L T I T 140 H F F Y X 1 E R
T A P 2 S T H 26TH
E G H R N B Q A R M 140 T W 21 R N S K S E N Y
T 1
I UV N 4 T E 1 L STRETCH Industrial D 2 T Y
S H 1 X T M A H 1 9 G 2 K Y 5 T 2
E T H N
Y LOPES E 1 H D A VAUGHN S 2 D L T A R H 1 E O W U IDA B1 4 F L T A T E
B H
H Y
T 1 Public/Quasi-Public 7TH CO R 9T D A S CELESTE S P L H Y O 1 1 1 O A L A T 3 N D L E
H T L C H Y S
E 99 E L
G E S WARDROBE T 1
S E STOCKTON BROOKS 0T 12 C N 140
D Mining R S H T E BAKER 5 H D K T C O
I
9 E O H R
T I R Q H IS 140 Y
K
N E T P S
H B
L 1 UV BODIE Y U
G O 4T D 8 B
I
O 2 H T C Vacant
R GR H G OGAN K 3R 5T L E R MERCED
N
B2 S D H A Y M
A 7T O R
4 N E C 2 T N H O T L C N H B E L D L E A 6 A
D O O 1 N T S L V H T
E Miscellaneous T A C V
S N E
I
A
N K E M
E R
R
D
D A H Y E
I BAILEY CHILDS A F
E A
A
E O C
M CHILDS D BAILEY FIG F
R W
L T N
P
L
A R HO E
M O B S E
A A
Z
N
H
I M C
N A
W
U
U STUART B
A
N N N R
T
O A B
R
Q R
C
E E I
O H E CONE D T
I
P
S S
R Y IG E M A G W I
S U
E O M L
W
R I O
T
M L BRITTANY Y
E T S
E
R
R L
S
R BLIX
HAWK M
N M
R
A M A
E E
AMANDA A
O U
H R H B
W
GER L T ARD
OAK A OAK 9 GERARD
R P
N
5
C A LUNA E
R T SAN PEDRO L
O A
Y
M
T H SONOMA R
T A
F
R 0 L
E 3 A
H
T Y
E
C A FERRY R DICKENSON MISSION L
M N
E MISSION
A L A E
D A
H
N D
W M
S
A R
L
E A
Y
L
I F
A
M E
B1 M L
Y -
T A
E A
S
L Y
T
I JERRY COLLINS E
E R N VASSAR 9 VASSA I R 9
V W
U
O
L
Q
G
O
O
Y
D H Y
E
C L
L
S A
T
E
R 1
N H
A A RICE REILLY
H Notes: See Chapter 3, Map MER 1, Compatibility Policy Map. T MCHENRY
I
P B2
A
C
L Unincorporated E Data Sources: Existing land use data and basemap details from Merced County, 2011. Runway alignment from Merced Regional Merced County Airport Layout Plan (2007). MARIPOSA
RODUNER UV59 Feet C 0 2,000 4,000 8,000 LINGARD ´
E T
R F I
T R
S H
U T
L MCMASTER Merced Regional Airport
S
N
E
V SHIPPEE I
G Land Use Compatibility Plan MCNAMARA (Adopted June 21, 2012)
E B.V.D.
E
R
R
T
R
U
E
G N MICHAEL
O Exhibit MER 6
L Existing Land Uses BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS CHAPTER 7
X T OSBORN SOLA M
E O S LM CARDELLA CARDELLA CARDELLA R F CARDELLA N Legend I BR F OA CLINTON O D T 1
W A AY N Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones City Planning Areas V
R
L MONACO
R I City of Atwater
A O PETTINOTTI Castle Airport DESTINY E C IL S AVENUE ONE
R H O A Agricultural
O D Airport Influence Area M H A T LAC M D F T AVA E O A C A VIGNON R A E R FF I S Influence Area
C D
A
A R R E I D E K TW AM W U LEHIGH U H Agricultural-Residential N N E FAA Height Notification Surface A
Y N AUPS A P A G R P N T I DUNN
L U Y A BELCHER D R E C
H U R N CO R BELCHER E RM I ORA R NT W T B D R C A O I E I
T S U N E
T T
S A N K D S
A R N O I KE Runway Rural Residential T
N Y
S W G R I I U R O O L
I N U O ORIO O G
A D I L
T J
E C V P LO R H V
E T D N R S
N E L A SOHAN O P
C
L
S N N
I R O A I A
L O O S N B PACIFIC T City Limits Low Density Residential
A U
K U
M E F P ATLANTIC D
E
R A F O
S A
I
T L D
G
A R I
K E
H C A P S
N U PART RID H A A M A GE
U R V L E
P N A Atwater Sphere of Influence Medium Density Residential I A
A G M C
U
T D L A D
A O S
O R FRANKLIN - BEACHWOOD R
R Q
N E A YOSEMITE Y E B E A D SEMIT C O YO N S M DAN WARD E
A Y I O E D PEBBLE BEACH V G JUNIPERO O L U G DOE
TUPELO P Merced Sphere of Influence High Density Residential S
S S M T Y N E E A A N L N H AL A CATALINA R V O A R I A L E U
O I E L R L R R O O M WAHNEE O O AH LEGENDS D L N I R L D R T L S N
L H
P I E O
I E A
A R T T R A A A
O N T D C BEA E Atwater General Plan Planning Area Residential
A H P A V OLLA K N I E A J L O
V F S A
I A A DONNA SILVERADO T IC FIR Z H
F H O C L S N N Y S
N
B S U
E W
M C S T M
N P C MIR M A ROR LAKE PINEHURST N R A U A City of Merced General Plan Planning Area General Commercial
&
I I N R N A A P Y N BUENA VI E S IN G STA P L
I D
E N A T E A A B T R D S A E EL PORTAL K
G M
D R PASEO VERDE H L H F A
O T
M A R 99 N E EL PO Community Boundaries Neighborhood Commercial C LOBO
A O
O MULBERRY C
E
A Y }þ ANTLE COLUMBIA N ·| F S R LOUGHBOROUGH N
W
A N
H U F
L B SPLIT OAK MENDES F N ROOKD H A Roads N L Heavy Commercial E S N U T R A
O
N
9 S K A U
C E E
B E
D 9 5
R W
E A N
W 9 F N
S
A L Y E K R IN W I
I
E E
E
E E
O
I
R
E A E L N
T E
N O LLIOTT E E F N TEAK I Urban Designations Highway Interchange Center
R E L R
B
S R H L L O A LEES DAYNA U Y
K
E
C D J O L
U
D C S OLIVE I XFORD R O C W
C I
A A D R S I OO A IVEW W Franklin Beachwood Community Plan Industrial OL V
Y A A
E NEVES L SH CABOT D G B C O P
E U B O IR H Y W P A A B
D J NO TH L E K I
A R GAIL B COOPER O A Agricultural-Residential Y EMERALD N R Public/Government
K ESSEX C
R R
E S ALEXANDER E W
IL I L G O RAMBLER O
N W
BR M K L O T
I B O K P F R
Y
L HANSEN F A N B CARDIF Very Low Density Residential D
I I O E C
R Public Use K F W
G
F E
U A G 2 E LANDRAM 4 E N R T A
L JAKE A B H N E
Q
M D
A
P N
T F
I Low Density Residential
N R Recreational W Q A ARDEN I
H F P E
A T MILES 2 City of Merced T L
E 2 S SOUTH BEAR CREEK
W
N
2 N I A N 1 ORT D D L H I B SHADOW BROOK U S 2 2 EAR CREEK Medium Density Residential T R MORAN 3 6 O Park/Open Space/Recreational
K MORAN O R RD TH
L
O 2 M N O 2 5 T F O 1 T 1 H O O S T 2 T 6 S H 7 S T T N L S T K S General Commercial
F C S C H I 1 H Regional Community C C A A
I D A T D E N R L LUCIL R 2 J HARNISCH N 4 H R V T R H N
A
R E O M A H H E 3 T T A ASTI O A T
B2 R O I 6 E Neighborhood Commercial N
O G Q C T N 8 O 1 0 T Industrial Reserve ELIZABETH S N 9 QUEEN P B F T G A M O R V H 1 O S A 2 L T ROGINA D ECC V M O 2 D
R A I N G I N A P 2 S A PICKERING 0 D A 27TH T E N N E Industrial N M A R S H I E I T Urban Reserve R 18 A E
P P
O L S T T I T H F F 140 Y X 1 E R
T A 2 S T H 26TH E H R B G N A R Institutional/Public M 140 T W Q 2 R Urban Expansion Area N 1 S K E N S Y T 1
I UV N 1 4 T E STRETCH D 2 T L Y
S H 1 X T M A H 1 9 K Y 5 T G 2
E T H 2
Y LOPES E 1 H N A Recreational VAUGHN S U 2 D D L T A Rural Residential Centers R 1 W H 4 E O L IDA
T B1 A T F E B 1 H H Y T 0 1 7TH T CO R 9T H L D A S CELESTE S Residential Reserve H Y O 1 L
L Agricultural 1 A 1 O A A E T 3 N D L
L C H T S N H Y E E L
G E S ARDROBE W T A S
N E 140 STOCKTON BROOKS R 1 C
2 D 5 S C T D E BAKER University Community Plan K Agricultural-Residential O T H C O H 9 I T R R E
Q H I IS 140 Y E K
P N
T S H B
1 G P UV L Y U BODIE
O 4T D 8 B Multiple Use Urban Development 2 I H T O Residential H C R GR U G OGAN K 3R 5T 7 E R MERCED
N
B2 T S D H H Y M A 4 O R E
L
N C 2 T O T University
C N H E B L General Commercial D L E D 6 A O
O 1 N T S L V H T T A
V
S
N 5 E
I
A
Y T N M
H E
R
A D R D
H E I
E BAILEY CHILDS A
A E Neighborhood Commercial O A
L
M C BAILEY FIG CHILDS D R
W
L N T
P
N A R HO E B S M
I E
A A Z
H
M
U
N A
W Neighborhood Commercial U STUART B
Q N A N
O T
E A B R R
E S C I
E H CO E
NE T D
I A P
M
R Y
E F IG O A
G G S U
S Institutional/Public E F
I M
L N
W
T
M L NY Y
BRITTA O
A R 7.3 E
S E
S
L BLIX
R M
N C
HAWK B R
R M M
E
A
E
A A Public Use AMAND E
O U
R
H
S B W GERARD
T S L ERARD A G
OAK A OAK 9
R P
N L
5 C A
LUNA E
R Isolated Urban Designations T SAN PEDRO L
O A
Y
M
H SONOMA T R
T A Residential
F
R 0 L
E 3 A
H Public Use
T Y
C A
DICKENSON FERRY R MISSION E
N
M MISSION Rural Designations L
A E A
H
D Agricultural M
S R
E A
Y YALE L
I
F Foothill Pasture
A
M
M
Y B1 -
T 9 E R A 9
S
L
T
R
I
JERRY COLLINS E
N E VASSAR U VASSAR
I R
V W
G
U
O
L
Q
G
O
O
Y
D H Y
E
C L
L
S A
T
E
R
N H
A JOHN SAUNDERS A RICE REILLY
H T MCHENRY I 9 9
P B2
A
C
Unincorporated
L
E 1 Merced County Notes: See Chapter 3, Map MER 1, Compatibility Policy Map.
MARIPOSA Data Sources: General Plan designations from Merced County, 2011. Basemap details from Merced County, 2011. Runway alignment from Merced Regional Airport Layout Plan (2007).
RODUNER 59 UV C LINGARD Feet 0 2,000 4,000 8,000 ´
E
R
T
S
U Merced Regional Airport
L MCMASTER
S
N
E
V Land Use Compatibility Plan SHIPPEE I MCNAMARA G (Adopted June 21, 2012)
E
E B.V.D.
R
T
E Exhibit MER 7A
N
O MICHAEL
L Detailed General Plan Land Uses: Merced County BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS CHAPTER 7
X T OSBORN SOLA M Legend
E O S LM CARDELLA CARDELLA CARDELLA R F CARDELLA N I BR 1 F OA CLINTON O Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones D T
W A AY N V Airport Influence Area
R
L MONACO
R I City of Atwater
A O PETTINOTTI Castle Airport DESTINY E C IL S AVENUE ONE O R H FAA Height Notification Surface
A O D
M H A T LAC M D F T AVA E O A C A VIGNON R A E R FF I S Influence Area
C D
A
A R R E City Limits I D E K TW AM W U LEHIGH U H N N
E A
Y N AUPS A P A G R P N T I DUNN
L U Y A BELCHER D R E C
H U R N CO R BELCHER E RM Atwater Sphere of Influence I ORA R NT W T B D R C A O I E I
T S U N E
T T
S A N K D S
A R N O I KE T
N Y
S W G R I I U R O O L
I N U O ORIO O Merced Sphere of Influence G
A D I L
T J
E C V P LO R H V
E T D N R S
N E L A SOHAN O P
C
L
S N N
I R O A I A
L O O S N B PACIFIC T Atwater General Plan Planning Area
A U
K U
M E F P ATLANTIC D
E
R A F O
S A
I
T L D
G
A R I
K E
H C A P S
N U PART RID H A A M A GE
U City of Merced General Plan Planning Area R V L E
P N A I A
A G M C
U
T D L A D
A O S
O R FRANKLIN - BEACHWOOD R
R Q
N E A YOSEMITE Y E B E A D SEMIT C Community Boundaries O YO N S M DAN WARD E
A Y I O E D PEBBLE BEACH V G JUNIPERO O L U G DOE
TUPELO P S
S S M T Y N E E A A N L N H AL A CATALINA R V O A R I A L E U
O I E L R L R R O O M WAHNEE Runway O O AH LEGENDS D L N I R L D R T L S N
L H
P I E O
I E A
A R T T R A A A
O N T D C BEA E
A H P A V OLLA K N I E A J L O
V F S A
I A A DONNA SILVERADO T IC FIR Z H Roads
F H O C L S N N Y S
N
B S U
E W
M C S T M
N P C MIR M A ROR LAKE PINEHURST N R A U A
&
I I N R N A Atwater General Plan (2000) A P Y N BUENA VI E S IN G STA P L
I D
E N A T E A A B T R D S A E EL PORTAL K
G M
D R PASEO VERDE H L H F A Downtown Residential (max FAR 2.00)
O T
M A R 99 N E EL PO C LOBO
A O
O MULBERRY C
E
A Y }þ ANTLE COLUMBIA N ·| F S R LOUGHBOROUGH N Residential Transition (max du/ac 21.00, max FAR 0.35)
W
A N
H U F
L B SPLIT OAK MENDES F N ROOKD H A N L E S N U T R A
O
N
9 S K A U
C E E
B E D High Density Residential (15.10 to 35.00 du/ac) 9 5
R W
E A N
W 9 F N
S
A L Y E K R IN W I
I
E E
E
E E
O
I
R
E A E L N
T E
N O LLIOTT E E F N TEAK I
R E L R B Medium Density Residential (7.10 to 15.00 du/ac)
S R H L L O A LEES DAYNA U Y
K
E
C D J O L
U
D C S OLIVE I XFORD R O C W
C I
A A D R Low Density Residential (3.10 to 7.00 du/ac) S I OO A IVEW W OL V
Y A A
E NEVES L SH CABOT D G B C O P
E U B O IR H Y W P A A B Very Low Density Residential (0 to 3.00 du/ac)
D J NO TH L E K I
A R GAIL B COOPER O A Y EMERALD N R
K ESSEX C
R R
E S ALEXANDER E W
IL I L G O RAMBLER O N W Manufacturing/Industrial (max FAR 0.50) BR M K L O T
I B O K P F R
Y
L HANSEN F A N B CARDIF
D
I I O E C
R K F W G Business Park (max FAR 0.40) F E
U A G 2 E LANDRAM 4 E N R T A
L JAKE A B H N E
Q
M D
A
P N
T F
I
N Commercial (max FAR 0.35)
R W Q A ARDEN I
H F P E
A T MILES 2 City of Merced T L
E 2 S SOUTH BEAR CREEK
W
N
2 N I A N Commercial Transition (max FAR 0.30) 1 ORT D D L H I B SHADOW BROOK U S 2 2 EAR CREEK T R MORAN 3 6 O
K MORAN O R RD TH
L
O 2 M N Park (max FAR 0.10) O 2 5 T F O 1 T 1 H O O S T 2 T 6 S H 7 S T T N L S T K S
F C S C H I 1 H C C A A
I Recreational (max FAR 0.10) D A T D E N R L LUCIL R 2 J HARNISCH N 4 H R V T R H N
A
R E O M A H H E 3 T T A ASTI O A T
B2 R O I 6 E N
O G Q C T N 8 Agriculture O 1 0 T ELIZABETH S N 9 QUEEN P B F T G A M O R V H 1 O S A 2 L T ROGINA D ECC V M O 2 D
R A I N G I N A P 2 S Path A PICKERING 0 D A 27TH T E N N E N M A R S H I E I T R 18 A E
P P
O L S T T I T H F F 140 Y X 1 E R Institutional (max FAR 0.40)
T A 2 S T H 26TH E H R B G N A R
M 140 T W Q 2 R N 1 S K E N S Y T 1
I UV N 1 4 T E STRETCH School (max FAR 0.40) D 2 T L Y
S H 1 X T M A H 1 9 K Y 5 T G 2
E T H 2
Y LOPES E 1 H N A VAUGHN S U 2 D D Future Park L T A R 1 W H 4 E O L IDA
T B1 A T F E B 1 H H Y T 0 1 7TH T CO R 9T Future School H L D A S CELESTE S H Y O 1 L 1 A 1 O A L A E T 3 N D L
L C H T S N H Y E E L
G E S ARDROBE Urban Reserve W T A S
N E 140 STOCKTON BROOKS R 1 C
2 D
5 S C T D E BAKER K O T H C O H 9 I T R R E
Q H I IS 140 Y Urban Reserve/Business Park E K
P N
T S H B
1 G P UV L Y U BODIE
O 4T D 8 B 2 I H T O H C R GR U G City of Merced General Plan OGAN K 3R 5T 7 E R MERCED
N
B2 T S D H H Y M A 4 O R E
L
N C 2 T O T Business Park (avg FAR 0.40)
C N H B E L
D L E D 6 A O
O 1 N T S L V H T T A
V
S
N 5 E
I
A
Y T N Business Park Reserve (avg FAR 0.40) M
H E
R
A D R D
H E I
E BAILEY CHILDS A
A E O A
L
M C BAILEY FIG CHILDS D R
W
L N T P Thoroughfare Commercial (avg FAR 0.30)
N A R HO E B S M
I E
A A Z
H
M
U
N A
W
U STUART B Commercial Reserve (avg FAR 0.35)
Q N A N
O T
E A B R R
E S C I
E H CO E
NE T D
I A P
M
R Y
E F IG O A General Commercial (avg FAR 0.35)
G G
S U
S E F
I M
L N
W
T
M L NY Y
BRITTA O
A R 7.3 E
S E
S L BLIX
R Regional Community Commercial (0.35 to 6.00 FAR) M
N C
HAWK B R
R M M
E
A
E
A A AMAND E
O U
R
H
S B W GERARD
T S L ERARD Neighborhood Commercial (avg FAR 0.35) A G
OAK A OAK 9
R P
N L
5 C A
LUNA E
R T SAN PEDRO L Commercial Office (avg FAR 0.50)
O A
Y
M
H SONOMA T R
T School A
F
R 0 L
E Public/General Use 3 A
H
Y T Manufacturing/Industrial (0.30 to 0.50 FAR)
C A
DICKENSON FERRY R MISSION E
N
M MISSION L
A E Industrial Reserve (0.30 to 0.50 FAR) A
H
D Agricultural M
S R
E
A Open Space - Park and Recreation
Y YALE L
I F
A
M
M Future Park
Y B1 -
T 9 E R A 9
S
L
T
R
I Village Residential (7.00 to 30.00 du/ac. min average of 10 du/ac)
JERRY COLLINS E
N E VASSAR U VASSAR
I R
V W
G U Low Density Residential (2.00 to 6.00 du/ac)
O
L
Q
G O Low to Medium Density Residential (6.10 to 12.00 du/ac)
O
Y
D H Y
E
C L
L High to Medium Density Residential (12.10 to 24.00 du/ac)
S A
T
E
R
N High Density Residential (24.10 to 36.00 du/ac) H
A JOHN SAUNDERS A RICE REILLY
H T MCHENRY I 9 9 Rural Residential (1.00 to 3.00 du/ac)
P B2
A
C Mobile Home Park Residential (6.00 to 10.00 du/ac) Unincorporated
L
E Residential Reserve (2.0 to 6.0 du/ac) Merced County Reserve/Community Plan/Master Plan 1 MARIPOSA Notes: See Chapter 3, Map MER 1, Compatibility Policy Map. Data Sources: General Plan designations from City of Merced, 2012. Basemap details from Merced County, 2011. Runway alignment from Merced Regional Airport Layout Plan (2007). RODUNER 59 UV C LINGARD Feet 0 2,000 4,000 8,000 ´
E
R
T
S
U
L MCMASTER
S Merced Regional Airport
N
E
V SHIPPEE I MCNAMARA G Land Use Compatibility Plan
E (Adopted June 21, 2012) E B.V.D.
R
T
E Exhibit MER 7B
N
O MICHAEL
L General Plan Land Uses: Cities of Merced and Atwater BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS CHAPTER 7
R A
Y
N T B E CLINTO SAGEWOOD R N A
S
F
O OA H
F
T U
D W W C A SUMMERGLEN A N Legend R G Y A MONACO H R I
H
R
A U TTI SILVA H PETTINO A DESTINY
I E
G L S I R AVENUE ONE A O
U O F
D Castle Airport H A LACAVA D B H Airport Influence Area O A AVIGNON R City of Atwater Zoning
A FF T D
T R E I D W AM LEHIGH U E 1 A G N N E Airport Influence Area P R N AUPS T K E R P N E EN I DUNN Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones Business Park R A D S BELCHER C A N CO A H R BELCHER RM I N E ORA D R D NT W
S R L O
I E I C T N U S
T T E
A N K D S
A
N O R I KE N Y S R T I W U I G O L UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY
O R I N O ORIO O G
D FAA Height Notification Surface Central Commercial A L I
T S J E C R V LO H P T O VE R S
N N L U SOHAN O E A P
C S T L
R H N I A
O O S
N E ACIFIC T
U P K R A P U ATLANTIC
M D N E Atwater Sphere of Influence General Commercial
A O
S A D I
L P G
I
K
A E
H C C P
N S U PART RIDGE H
A I A A U V F R
L I A
A I C N
A G O C
U
D
M T N L Merced Sphere of Influence Neighborhood Commercial
A S O A
O R R FRANKLIN - BEACHWOOD R
Q R N E YOSEMITE A E Y YOSEMITE B A D C O M M N E
DAN WARD A Y I PEBBLE BEACH P E V G JUNIPERO O L G DOE TUPELO P
S S S E M N City of Atwater A N CATALINA A A City Limits R O Office Commercial R A L A U
O I E L O L R
O M O NEE R O D AHWAH LEGENDS L L I D R
T L S N
L H
E
E E I O
I R A R A A T O A
BEA T N D
E
A
D H P V LA A E OL K N J O V LA Community Boundaries S Thoroughfare Commercial
A A I DONNA Z A SILVERADO T A FIR H
F H C L O S
N Y N
N S B
E S U D W
N M C M T I S P A PINEHURST N M C R MIRROR LAKE A U
N
& A I N R L
N I A
P Runway A Y N BU I Golf Course G ENA VISTA E S N P
E
I D
A E N K T A R A B T R D S A E EL PORTAL D
G M
R
T N EO VERDE H PAS L H F A
O T
M A OR 99 A LOBO E EL P C Roads Light Industrial
O
O MULBERRY C
R E
A Y ANTLE COLUMBIA N ·|}þ F S
N F LOUGHBOROUGH
W A N
H F SPLIT OAK MENDES L N BROOKD U H N A L S T E N U O R A
N 9 S Heavy Industrial A K U
E E City of Merced Zoning C
D B E 5
R
A W N W F
E
N
Y E 9 K R S A IN L I E W I 9 E E
E E
O
I
R
A E L E
N E
T N
O E LLIOTT F N E I TEAK
R E L R
B R H L R-1-20 Low Density Residential Planned Development
S A L U LEES O DAYNA Y K
E
C D J O
L D C
U
S XFORD OLIVE I O C W R
C I
A A
R
S D
I OO A EW W OLIV V A Y A K
E R-1-10 Low Density Residential Low Density Residential L S NEVES H CABOT D G
B
P
O R
B E U OAH C Y WO AIR N B
D J H L
A T E K I COOPER A R GAIL B Y O EMERALD
R N P
C
ESSEX K R-1-6 Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential R
S ALEXANDER E W E
IL I L G OW O B M L R
T B OO K P F R Y F HANSEN N A B CARDIF
I I O D E C F W R R-1-5 Low Density Residential High Density Residential
G
F E U G 2
A E LANDRAM R 4T E
A
L JAKE A H B Q N E
City of Merced D A M
N P N
T F
I V N I R-2 Low Medium Density Residential Residential Estate
E A L Q 2 I L W P ARDEN 8 A E H
T
I
T G MILES T
K O 2 H O
2 E L
7 S SOUTH BEAR CREEK BEAR CREEK S 5
2 T W A N 2 2 I JOSIE T N N 1 O H H RT 6 L H D I OK U S 2 H BEAR CRE SHADOW BRO T N 2 N TH EK
E R
O
A D MORAN 3 A R-3-2 Medium Density Residential Mobile Home Park District K
O R RD
L T
O R O M N O 2 I
L
F F 1 T 1 O O O H T 6 S S T S T T N S K S F C S H L C 1 C R-3-1.5 High/Med. Density Residential Residential Transition A
I
D T N R C A
D LUCILLE R A 2 J HARNISCH 4 R V H T R H H A N
E N
O R 1 H H E 9 T A T T 3 T ASTI O A
T R
N H O G 6 E
O Q T 8 O T R-4 High Density Residential U C 0 ELIZABETH B2 S QUEEN N B Merced County Zoning
F
O G A M R V 1 O
S O A 2 LEC T ROGINA D CO V
R M D A 2 N P I G I N A P 2 S
M A PICKERING 0 D A 27TH
E N T N E N M A
R S I
I H R-MH Mobile Home E A-1 General Agriculture
Y T R 18 A E
P P T
L S L T I T 140 O H F F Y X 1 M E R
T
P A
S 2 A H 26TH
E T H R IN B G
N A R
M 140 T W Q 21 R C-G General Commercial A-2 Exclusive Agriculture N S S E N Y
T 1
I UV N 4 T E 1 STRETCH D 2 T K L Y
S H 1 X T M A H 1 9 2 K Y 5 T G 2
E T H N
Y LOPES E 1 H D A VAUGHN S 2 D C-N Neighborhood Commercial A-R Agricultureal Residential L U T A R H 1 E O W 4 L IDA
T A T F E B 1 H B1 H Y T 7TH 0T C R 19 O T S H A S L D H Y CELESTE O 1 C-T Thoroughfare Commercial R-1 Single-Family Residential 1 1 O A L
A E T 3 N D L
H T L
C H Y S L G 99 E E
E S ARDROBE
W T S E STOCKTON BROOKS R 12 C N 140
S D T E BAKER 5 H D K C-O Office Commercial R-1-5K Single-Family Residential (5K') O T C O
I H 9 R E
T I R E Q H IS 140 Y K
N
T P S
H B G P L 1 UV Y U BODIE
O 4T 8 B C-C Central Commercial M-H Single-Family Mobile Home I
O 2 H T C
D R GR U H G OGAN K 3R 5 L E R MERCED
N D T A Y M S
A B2 H 7T O R
4 N E C 2 T N H O T L C N H B E RP-D Res. Planned Development R-2 Two-Family Residential L D L E A 6 A
D O O 1 T S L V N H T E T A C V
S N E
I
A
N K E M
E
R R
D
D A H Y E
I BAILEY CHILDS A F P-D Planned Development R-3 Multi-Family Residential
A E A
E O C
M CHILDS D BAILEY FIG F
R W
L N T P
L
A R H E
O O B S M
E A
A Z
N
H
I M C
N I-L Light Industrial A R-4 Multi-Family Residential
W U
U STUART B
A
N N N R
T O A B
R
Q R
C
E E I
O
H E CONE D T
I
P
S
R S M I Y G E I-H Heavy Industrial A G W C-1 Neighborhood Commercial I
S U
E O M L
R I O W
T
M L BRITTANY Y
E T
S E
R R
S L
R BLIX
HAWK M
N
R M A M A-1-20 Restricted Agricultural E
A C-2 General Commercial E
AMANDA A
O U
H R
H B W GER T ARD L
A OAK 9 GERARD
OAK R P
N
5 C A A-T-5 Agricultural Transition LUNA E C-3 Heavy Commercial
R T SAN PEDRO L
O A
Y
M
T H SONOMA R U-T Urban Transition C-P Commercial Professional Office
T A
F
R 0 L
E 3 A C-T Commercial Transition
H
T Y
E
A
R C DICKENSON FERRY MISSION L H-I-C Highway Interchange Center
M N
E MISSION
A L
E
D
A A
H
N
D M-1 Light Manufacturing
W M
S
A R
L
E A
Y L M-2 General Manufacturing
I F
A
M E
M L
Y -
T B1 PD Planned Development A
E A
S
L Y
T
I JERRY COLLINS E
E N VASSAR 9 VASSAR I R 9
R
V W SPZ Special Planning Zone
U
R
O
L
Q
U
G
O Y
G L
O
Y A
H
E D E
C
L H
S
T 1
R
N
A A RICE REILLY Notes: See Chapter 3, Map MER 1, Compatibility Policy Map. T H MCHENRY
I
P B2
A
C
L E Data Sources: Zoning designations from MCAG, 2010, and Unincorporated Merced County, 2010. Basemap details from Merced County, Merced County MARIPOSA 2011. Runway alignment from Merced Regional Airport Layout
Plan (2007). Y
RODUNER L
59 A
UV E H C LINGARD Feet 0 2,000 4,000 8,000 ´
E T
R F I
T R
S H
U T
L MCMASTER S Merced Regional Airport
N
E
V SHIPPEE I MCNAMARA G Land Use Compatibility Plan
E (Adopted June 21, 2012) B.V.D.
E
How to Read the Maps R
T The Zoning maps show zoning designations for both the cities and the
E
N MICHAEL Exhibit MER 8
unincorporated county. ZoningO within the cities extends only to the city limits. The County's zoningL designations apply to everything outside the city limits. Planned Land Uses - Zoning BACKGROUND DATA: MERCED REGIONAL AIRPORT AND ENVIRONS CHAPTER 7
S
X HOLL M Y A
O G SOLA S F RO N CARDELLA A V N 6 E Y CARDELLA CARDELLA T
CARDELLA O H 7 8 T H
A A T T WARDROBE E H H Legend
T
S
K C C LINTON SAGEWOOD V R W G
N
U A T R E R
R
I H G SUMMERGLEN O H
O A City of Atwater U U MONACO E S 5 6 F ETTINOTTI T B H P A DESTINY E H T B E E G H Airport Influence Area AVENUE ON L R T OA D LACAVA
D E A W AVIGNON R
A N K 1 D Y D E
A I AT LEHIGH A U A G N N E
G UPS L W R N A E R P N B2 A EN I A DUNN Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones O CHER D T S BEL C D A N U 4 H R ELCHER CO I E N B E RMORA T S R H DS R D NT W H
R O
I E I C T U E T S T K N
N O A D
N S I KE
N R S T W
R U I Y G O L O UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY
I
ORION O
O D A L I G T
J
E V R 1 C H LO T City of Merced 5
V
ER S GROGAN T N N Castle Airport E
HAN L O FAA Height Notification Surface SO P H 2 C S L 3
A N I R
O O A L S N Y D B C T U PACIFI U E 9 A P ATLANTIC
M D E D R 9 O A
S I A
G D T O L P
A I K F E A
Airport InflueFnce Area H
P C S
U R N PA 4 RTRI H A DGE E T U A A R R E H
L M N
A A Atwater Sphere of Influence
G P C U R
D
M L A D Q A S 2
N
O R FRANKLIN - BEACHWOOD C R
N N
Q E
A B Y E A YOSEMDITE EC D O YOSEMIT N M A S E DAN WARD A IN I - W E O D V PEBBLE BEACH Y G JUNIPER L L O O G DOE F 1 U TUPELO P S S M S S M Y N T E A L O A N L N CATA T LI O H VA A NA R A
R I A
U E E C O I L L R O R M Merced Sphere of Influence O R EAG D EE LE R I O O AHWAHN LEGENDS L D N R R T N S
L O H L O E E C P I T R R A T A
A A O T D BEA N E N H C A A P A V OLL K E J I LA O F S A A A DONNA SILVERADO Z D T F IC FIR H N H O C L S S BAILEY N N B O
E S CHILDS W U O
M C S T M C PINEHURST City Limits M A MIRROR L N AKE R T A U A R
I I & R N N A
Y N BUENA VIS E S IN FIG N G TA P D L
E
N A T E
B R T
A D T A E U R PORTAL S K EL
D M JOYCE R VERDE PASEO B S H F O I
M B1 N O E A L HOME 99 LOBO E C
O
A
A T O N H C MULBERRY O S E C Community Boundaries
A Y H ANTLE COLMUMBIA N AL þ} F W S | T B · R R F BOROUGH N O W LOUGH O A N KDA E H L U F L B E MENDES F N ROOK K H D N A R
L S N T E A U R
O
N R 9 S A U
C E 9 E O B
E D 9 5 A R F A W N W N
A Y E ART R L STU K IN I W E I N E E E P
E
O Runway
I
E E A L E
T IOTT N O E ELL F R I TEAK
L R
B R
H
L R S LEES DAYNA L I U Y
K G
J E C O L
C
D
U
G T OLIVE I OXFORD R C
C I
A A S D A S
I OO EW W LIV V A O Y
E L E Roads SH CABOT D G O B
E U C B O IR AH Y W P A W
O B J N H L D
T K
E I R GAIL A COOPER A NO EMERALD B
R
ESSEX C K R
S R
S ALEXANDER WI E
O L I L G OW RAMBLER O U BR K M
T P B OO T K P
F Y R F H HANSEN S A
B CARDIF E N I
R D C O E
N N W R R T G
E G A P 2 H E M CRAIG E LANDRA A 4T B O A L E C B H A N E
D I S F R S HAWK
E
N N I S C T C F
I
R I N A R E B
A N O
L E W T K ARDEN I
A A E H
T A M MILES 2 T
H K F 2 2 7 6 P T E L OUTH BEAR CREEK BEAR CREEK E 5 T S S
W H O N A A 2 T H I
N L D I OW BROOK U 2N H HAD 2 T S C T O
R MORAN A S D 3
O R RARD R N GE D C
M R O O 2 I O
F F
1 O 1 H M
T 6 S S T T N S S H L K C
C C A I D T
R C LUCILLE Q A 2 N HARNISCH 4 H R V P T R H A N E N H C H A E T J 3 T A ASTI O A
T O
R G 6 E T 8 B2 O T 0 QUEEN ELIZABETH S N C B
G M A D O R V 1 O
S 1 ROGINA A 9 2 D LECCO V M 2 D R R A T N I N G I P S PICKERING A H 20 D A 27TH E E A N T N
M I N A S
R
I H 1 T E E 8 A H P
40 P
1 S T O T I L H F F R Y X E 1 M C
T A 2 T A H 26TH E H I B G R N R N A R 140 T M Q 2 R N 1
S
E O N Y T 1 S
I UV N 1 4 T E W L STRETCH D 2 T K Y S H X T M A H 1 G K Y 5 2
E T 2
E Y LOPES 1 H D N A VAUGHN S City of Merc2ed D D 0 L T A R W U H 14 E 1 O L IDA
T A T F 9 E 3 B1 B H T 1 H H Y T 7TH 0 C T L O H S S L Y CELESTE O 1 1 A 1 O A L
A T 3 N L E T O H L
C N H Y F S L F E G E S WARDROBE T A R S
N BROOKS 12 AM E 140 R S D C T E BAKER
5 D P K
T H O
9 I H E O T R
Y Feet Q H I 140 K
S
E P N
P H B
L 1 UV
Y BODIE
U G O 4T 8 B I 2 D T O H C
R GR H G OGAN 3 0 1,000 2,000 K 4,000 R 5 7 E R MERCED N Y B2 D T T M S R H H O A N FERRY 4 E ICKENSO O D C T N
2 T E N H B C L D 6 D L E O
O
1 S N T L V T H T VIERRA
E N 5 S T A N H M R
D D R H
E BAILEY CHILDS A
E A
A CHILDS O BAILEY C FIG R W
L T N
P A R HO B T ME
A A Z
H
A N
W U STUART B
N A N R
T O E
B A R R
C
E S
I E
E H CON E
E T D
I
P A
R M Y
E F IG O
A W
G G
S U
S E F
N M
L
I O W
T
M L TANY Y
BRIT O A
E
R T E S
S
L BLIX R
HAWK M
N C
R B M R
M A
E
E
A A AMAND E
O U
R
H S G B
W ERARD S T L GERARD
A
OAK 9 A
OAK R P
N
5 L C A
LUNA E
R T SAN PEDRO L
O A
Y
M
H
SONOMA T R D T A
F R
R
L 0 A
E
A
3 H
H C
T
Y
E R
A
R C DICKENSON FERRY L N MISSIO O
M
N
E MISSION
A L
E
A D A
H
N D
W M
S
A R
L
E A
Y
L
I F
A
M E
M
- B1 L
T
A A
S
T Y
I JERRY COLLINS E 1 E VASSAR VASSAR
R
V W Notes: See Chapter 3, Map MER 1, Compatibility Policy Map.
O
L
G
O
O
R
Y
H Y R D
E
C L
L
U
S A
T
G E
R
N H
A A RICE REILLY Data Sources: Basemap details from Merced County, 2011.
H T MCHENRY
I
P B2 Runway alignment from Merced Regional Airport Layout Plan
A
C (2007). Aerial image from ESRI, 2011.
L
E
MARIPOSA MARIPOSA
R
E
E
Unincorporated N Feet
O
RODUNER I Merced County 59 P 0 2,000 4,000 8,000 ´ UV C LINGARD
E T
R F I
T
R Merced Regional Airport
S H
U T
L MCMASTER
S
N
E Land Use Compatibility Plan
V SHIPPEE I MCNAMARA G (Adopted June 21, 2012)
E
E
R B.V.D.
T Exhibit MER 9 E
N
O
L MICHAEL Aerial View