Chapter 11 -- Safety Chapter 11--Safety

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 11 -- Safety Chapter 11--Safety Chapter 11 -- Safety Chapter 11--Safety 11.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................11-1 11.1.1 Scope of the Safety Element..........................................................................................11-1 11.1.2 City of Merced Emergency Response/Disaster Plan .....................................................11-1 11.2 Relevant Issues............................................................................................................................11-2 11.2.1 Seismically Induced Ground Shaking............................................................................11-2 11.2.2 Ground Failure...............................................................................................................11-5 11.2.3 Dam Failure/Seiche........................................................................................................11-8 11.2.4 Flooding.......................................................................................................................11-10 11.2.5 Urban Fires & Wildland Fires......................................................................................11-16 11.2.6 Airport Safety Zones....................................................................................................11-24 11.2.7 Crime & Policing .........................................................................................................11-27 11.2.8 Hazardous Materials & Waste .....................................................................................11-29 11.3 Safety Goals, Policies, and Actions ..........................................................................................11-30 11.4 Technical Data..........................................................................................................................11-39 11.4.1 Definitions...................................................................................................................11-39 11.4.2 Dam Failure Characteristics.........................................................................................11-40 11.4.3 Hazards Unknown in the Merced Planning Area.........................................................11-40 11-0 Chapter 11 Safety 11.1 INTRODUCTION issues as well as hazard response. Section 11.2 includes the goals, policies, and The main purpose of the Safety Element is implementing actions. Section 11.4 contains to provide policies and implementing technical information and support data of actions aimed at reducing injuries, death, the hazards analysis. The Safety Element is property damage, and the economic and one of the seven required elements of the social dislocation resulting from natural General Plan per State law. hazards. The Safety Element is based on an analysis of geologic and other hazards 11.1.2 City of Merced Emergency relevant to Merced and on ways of Response/Disaster Plan protecting the community from any unreasonable risk associated with such In 2003, the City of Merced updated its hazards. Emergency Response/Disaster Plan and a countywide plan was also adopted. Both 11.1.1 Scope of the Safety Element plans are updated as needed to respond to new hazards. The Plan addresses The Safety Element provides a systematic mitigation, planning, response, and recovery approach for responding to hazards relevant activities for various emergency situations. to the City of Merced through a set of goals, The Plan consists of: 1) general policies, and actions designed to deal with information; 2) initial response operations; those hazards. This report recognizes that 3) extended operations; and 4) recovery. hazards are an unavoidable aspect of society and that, therefore, some degree of risk is The purpose of the plan is to provide inherent in everyday life. emergency planning, organization, and response. The Plan deals with emergency The proposed Merced growth boundary (or management through the Incident Command SUDP/SOI) has no known history of, or System (ICS)/National Incident known geographical conditions for, surface Management System (NIMS), law rupture, tsunamis, or hydro-compaction. All enforcement, traffic control, fire, medical, other hazards relevant to Merced, however, rescue and radiological material, shelter, and are addressed in more detail in other support and resources. The plan is designed sections of this Element. This introduction to prepare the community for responding to includes an overview of the City’s an emergency situation in a highly Emergency Response/Disaster Plan. Section 11.2 presents an analysis of the relevant 11-1 Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Chapter 11--Safety organized and efficient way so that chaotic The amount of damage to structures from an situations are avoided. earthquake is determined by several factors: (1) Distance from the earthquake epicenter; 11.2 RELEVANT ISSUES (2) nature of the ground; (3) type of construction; and (4) the duration of the Seismically induced ground shaking, ground shaking. failure, dam failure/seiche, flooding, urban and wildland fires, airport safety, crime and policing, and hazardous materials are considered the relevant hazards to the City of Merced. 11.2.1 Seismically Induced Ground Shaking Seismic safety has traditionally been looked at as an individual/family responsibility; however, because we are spending increasing amounts of time in public areas and because of our increased reliance on public services, our personal safety in an The Distance From the Epicenter earthquake may depend in large part on Merced is vulnerable to shaking from a what our City, employer, or local merchant number of faults that run through the has done to prepare. Earthquake activity mountains to our east and west. These have can include severe ground settling, dam shaken Merced in the past. Of most failure, and landslides, but most people notoriety is the San Andreas Fault, 58 miles equate earthquakes with the movement of away. There are, however, four active faults the earth along a fault or fracture zone. closer to Merced than the San Andreas. Merced is vulnerable to possible earthquake These faults are shown in Figure 11.1. damage from earthquake epicenters in other portions of the State, earthquakes on The Nature of The Ground “nearby” faults, and earthquakes on what are Earthquake shockwaves are “carried” by the now undiscovered faults within the Central relatively loose, wet soils that exist between Valley. Los Banos and Merced. For this reason, Merced is somewhat more likely to Historically, Merced has received several jolts a experience heavy shaking from surrounding year from earthquakes in surrounding parts parts of the state as will some of its of the State. Typically, it has been the larger neighbors. Areas of Merced with high water earthquakes from these areas that cause tables and loose soils are likely to damage. Because earthquakes run in experience damage because of the “cycles of frequency and intensity” where a shockwave carrying ability of the ground. period of long inactivity is followed by Next to damage from ground shaking, several medium and large quakes it is liquefaction is the most serious earthquake theorized that Merced, along with the rest of hazard. California, may experience rising earthquake risks 11-2 Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Chapter 11--Safety GEOLOGIC FAULTS IN AND AROUND Figure MERCED COUNTY 11.1 11-3 Merced Vision 2030 General Plan Chapter 11--Safety The Type of Construction Used Hazard Response -- Ground Shaking Typically, buildings designed and When ground shaking occurs, people are constructed since the mid-1970’s and generally encouraged to stay where they are according to modern codes, have generally and to prepare themselves for any performed very well during earthquakes. aftershocks that may take place. For these However, the following construction types reasons, the discussion in this chapter will have garnered some concern within the not involve evacuation routes and minimum seismologist community regarding their road widths as they pertain to evacuation. safety in earthquakes: a. Concrete-Frame Structures Built Before Merced currently has 21wells throughout the 1976 City. Eight of these wells pump directly into the water main system, and 10 of these Although Merced has relatively few wells pump into the City’s four water buildings of this type, the cost of towers. It is Merced’s current policy to strengthening the necessary connections place one well in each square mile of the is a relatively inexpensive procedure, City, reinforce each of the well stations while potential benefit is great. These beyond required seismic standards, supply buildings generally house industrial each well with standby power to last about activities and their collapse could cause three normal-use days, interloop the water severe economic loss and possibly the main system, and construct water piping of release of hazardous materials. flexible ductile iron. For these reasons, it is b. Un-reinforced Masonry Buildings reasonable to expect newer parts of the City to retain much of its water supply capacity Although Merced has relatively few in the event of an earthquake. buildings of un-reinforced masonry, it will be necessary to reinforce these structures as modifications are proposed. If structures of this type are identified as unsafe or a potential risk to the general public, repairs/upgrades could be required. It has been determined that an earthquake of 5.0 magnitude or greater
Recommended publications
  • United States of America Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary Washington, D.C
    Order 2021-7-8 Served: July 16, 2021 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation On the 16th day of July, 2021 Essential Air Service at MERCED, CALIFORNIA DOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3521 (FAIN 69A3456021378)1 under 49 U.S.C. § 41731 et seq. ORDER EXTENDING CONTRACT Summary By this Order, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) extends the terms of Order 2017-6-19 to the earlier of (i) December 31, 2021; or (ii) the conclusion of the current air carrier-selection case at Merced, California. Boutique Air, Inc. (Boutique Air) will continue to provide Essential Air Service (EAS) at Merced from August 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021. During the extension period, Boutique Air will continue to receive the existing annual subsidy rate and will operate the existing service pattern. Background By Order 2017-6-19 (June 26, 2017), the Department selected Boutique Air to provide EAS at Merced for the four-year period from August 1, 2017, through July 31, 2021. Under the terms of that Order, Boutique Air was selected to provide 19 nonstop round trips per week to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and 12 nonstop round trips per week to Oakland International Airport (OAK), using 8- or 9-seat Pilatus PC-12 aircraft, at the annual subsidy rates indicated below: Ye ar Subs idy Year 1$ 3,186,220 Year 2$ 3,249,944 Year 3$ 3,314,943 Year 4 $ 3,381,242 Total$ 13,132,349 1 Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN).
    [Show full text]
  • UNDERSTANDING REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS California Adaptation Planning Guide
    C A L I F O R N I A ADAPTATION PLANNING GUIDE UNDERSTANDING REGIONAL CHARACTERISTICS CALIFORNIA ADAPTATION PLANNING GUIDE Prepared by: California Emergency Management Agency 3650 Schriever Avenue Mather, CA 95655 www.calema.ca.gov California Natural Resources Agency 1416 Ninth Street, Suite 1311 Sacramento, CA 95814 resources.ca.gov WITH FUNDING Support From: Federal Emergency Management Agency 1111 Broadway, Suite 1200 Oakland, CA 94607-4052 California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS-29 Sacramento, CA 95814-5512 WITH Technical Support From: California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 July 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Adaptation Planning Guide (APG) has benefited from the ideas, assessment, feedback, and support from members of the APG Advisory Committee, local governments, regional entities, members of the public, state and local non-governmental organizations, and participants in the APG pilot program. CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY MARK GHILARDUCCI SECRETARY MIKE DAYTON UNDERSECRETARY CHRISTINA CURRY ASSISTANT SECRETARY PREPAREDNESS KATHY MCKEEVER DIRECTOR OFFICE OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION JOANNE BRANDANI CHIEF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION DIVISION, HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING DIVISION KEN WORMAN CHIEF HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING DIVISION JULIE NORRIS SENIOR EMERGENCY SERVICES COORDINATOR HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING DIVISION KAREN MCCREADY ASSOCIATE GOVERNMENT PROGRAM ANALYST HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING DIVISION CALIFORNIA NATURAL RESOURCE AGENCY JOHN LAIRD SECRETARY JANELLE BELAND UNDERSECRETARY
    [Show full text]
  • Lynchburg Regional Connectivity Study
    Lynchburg Regional Connectivity Study Prepared for: Virginia Department of Transportation – Lynchburg District & Virginia Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment Prepared by: Economic Development Research Group, Inc. Michael Baker International and Renaissance Planning March 2, 2017 INSERT DUE DATE TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 Approach .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Findings ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 5 Motivation and Context ................................................................................................................... 5 Study Approach and Outcomes ....................................................................................................... 5 Report Organization ......................................................................................................................... 8 2. Lynchburg Regional Economy ................................................................................................. 9 Population Trends ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Merced County Regional Waste Management Authority Landfill-Gas-To-Energy Project
    Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Merced County Regional Waste Management Authority Landfill-Gas-to-Energy Project June 2019 PREPARED FOR: Merced Regional Waste Management Authority Merced County Regional Waste Management Authority 7040 North Highway 59 Merced, California 95348 (209) 723-4481 Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Merced County Regional Waste Management Authority Landfill-Gas-to-Energy Project Prepared for: Merced Regional Waste Management Authority Merced County Regional Waste Management Authority 7040 North Highway 59 Merced, California 95348 (209) 723-4481 Contact: Jerry Lawrie, Environmental Resource Manager [email protected] Prepared By: Ascent Environmental, Inc. 455 Capitol Mall, Suite 300 Sacramento, California 95814 916/444-7301 Contact: Chris Mundhenk June 2019 18010098.02 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................................................................................... iii 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction and Regulatory Guidance ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Why this Document? ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intiial Study
    UC MERCED DOWNTOWN CENTER PROJECT Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The following Initial Study has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. SCH NO. 2015041087 Prepared By: University of California, Merced 5200 North Lake Road Merced, CA 95343 June 2015 Contact: Phillip Woods, Director of Physical & Environmental Planning [email protected] Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Initial Study ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Public and Agency Review ......................................................................................................................... 1 Organization of the Initial Study ................................................................................................................ 2 1. PROJECT INFORMATION ......................................................................................................................... 4 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Location ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Conditions .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Merced County Top 25 Census Tracts: Black/African American (Raw)
    Merced 2020 Census Webinar Data Merced County Top 25 Census Tracts: Black/African American (Raw) Tract City/Area Geographic Description Black/African American (raw) 10.02 Merced Area surrounding Merced College; south of E. Bellevue Rd/W. Cardella Rd; 1,065 east of Snelling Hwy/Thornton Rd/Beachwood Dr; north of Santa Fe Dr/Black Rascal Creek; west of G St. 16.02 Merced East of Merced Municipal Airport; south of Childs Ave; east of N. West Ave; 539 north of E. Mission Ave; west of 99 Hwy. 23.02 Los Banos Eastern area; south of Henry Miller Ave; east of Mercy Springs Rd; north of 456 Philips Rd/Pacheco Blvd; west of Delta Rd. 5.03 The Grove Northeast of Winton, surrounding Castle Airport. South of Merced River; 432 east of Santa Fe Dr/Shaffer Rd; north of Santa Fe Dr; west of N. Franklin Rd/Snelling Hwy. 24.02 Dos Palos Central area; south of Carmellia Ave; east of Lexington Ave; north of Merril 397 Ave; west of Custer Ave. 10.03 Merced Loughborough area; south of Fahrens Park; east of Snelling Hwy; north of 358 Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail/NW Bear Creek Dr; west of R St. 16.01 Merced Southcentral area, east of Merced Regional Airport; south of 99 Hwy; east of 351 M St; north of Childs Ave; west of 99 Hwy. 10.04 Merced Area around Merced Mall & Merced High School; south of Black Rascal 332 Creek; east of R St; north of NW Bear Creek Drive; west of G St. 8.01 Atwater Area around Castle Gardens; south of E.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Airport Policies and Compatibility Maps
    Chapter 3 Individual Airport Policies and Compatibility Maps Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan 3 Individual Airport Policies and Compatibility Maps CHAPTER OVERVIEW The policies and maps presented in this chapter provide the connection between the compatibility cri- teria outlined in Chapter 2 and the specific features and surrounding geography of each individual air- port. Included for each airport is the overall compatibility map that works in conjunction with the Compatibility Criteria matrix included in Chapter 2—Table 2A. This Chapter also includes the airspace protection (height limit) surfaces associated with the related policies in Chapter 2. The airspace protec- tion surfaces are as defined by Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77 for the respective airport. Additionally, at some airports, special conditions as provided for in Policy 5.5.9 of Chapter 2 have been acknowledged by the Merced County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) in adoption of this Com- patibility Plan . These special conditions result in establishment of compatibility zone boundaries and/or compatibility criteria different in character from the zones and criteria applicable to other airports in the county. Where any such additional policies have been adopted for a particular airport, they are listed in the respective section of this chapter. These special policies are not to be generalized or considered as precedent applicable to other locations near the same airport or to the environs of other airports ad- dressed by this plan. For most airports, no special policies are noted and the policies in Chapter 2 pre- vail. The general concepts used to develop the compatibility zone boundaries depicted on the compatibility map for each airport are summarized in Table 3A.
    [Show full text]
  • Order: 2021-3-7 Served: March 4, 2021 UNITED
    Order: 2021-3-7 Served: March 4, 2021 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 4th day of March, 2021 Essential Air Service at MERCED, CALIFORNIA DOT-OST-1998-3521 Under 49 U.S.C. § 41731 et seq. ORDER REQUESTING PROPOSALS Summary By this Order, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) is requesting proposals from air carriers interested in providing Essential Air Service (EAS) at Merced, California, for a new contract term beginning August 1, 2021, with or without subsidy. Air carriers should file proposals no later than April 6, 2021. Background By Order 2017-6-19 (June 26, 2017), the Department selected Boutique Air, Inc. (Boutique Air) to provide EAS at Merced for the four-year period from August 1, 2017, through July 31, 2021. Under the terms of that Order, Boutique Air was selected to provide 19 nonstop round trips per week to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and 12 nonstop round trips per week to Oakland International Airport (OAK), using 8- or 9-seat Pilatus PC-12 aircraft, at the annual subsidy rates indicated below: Ye ar Subs idy Year 1$ 3,186,220 Year 2$ 3,249,944 Year 3$ 3,314,943 Year 4 $ 3,381,242 Total$ 13,132,349 By Order 2018-6-5 (June 7, 2018), the Department approved Boutique Air’s request to alter its service pattern at Merced to provide 20 weekly round trips to LAX and 8 weekly round trips to - 2 - OAK (rather than 19 and 12, respectively), at no additional annual subsidy, effective June 10,
    [Show full text]
  • Background Data: Merced Regional Airport and Environs
    Chapter 7 Background Data: Merced Regional Airport and Environs Merced County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan 7 Background Data: Merced Regional Airport and Environs OVERVIEW Merced Regional Airport/Macready Field is located in the City of Merced approximately 2.5 miles southwest of the city center. The airport is owned and operated by the City of Merced. The airport was built in 1928 and has historically been used for commercial and general aviation. Merced Regional Airport is the only airport in the County currently offering commercial airline service. EXISTING AIRFIELD SYSTEM Merced Regional Airport encompasses 450 acres and has a single paved runway (Runway 12-30) 5,914 feet long and 150 feet wide. It is designated as an Airport Reference Code (ARC) 1 C-III facility that can accommodate aircraft with wingspans of up to 118 feet (e.g., Boeing 737-700). The runway is oriented in a northwest/southeast direction. The original airfield system included a crosswind runway (designated 6-24) that has since been abandoned. Runway 30 is equipped with straight-in precision instrument approach capabilities providing visibility minimums of ½ statute mile. Runway 12 has nonprecision instrument approach procedures with visibility minimums of 1 statute mile. The size of the RPZ at each runway end is a function of the type of aircraft and approach visibility minimum associated with that runway end. The dimensions of the existing RPZ for Runway 30 are: 1,000 foot inner width, 1,750 foot outer width and a length of 2,500 feet. Approximately 75% of the existing RPZ is on airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles International Airport Flight Schedule
    Los Angeles International Airport Flight Schedule Smeared Tobit delates alarmedly while Orbadiah always insolated his wager greys germanely, he apologizing so tactlessly. Protozoal Urbain still grass: librational and creakier Hebert chalks quite sceptically but slenderized her astrometry laconically. Symphysial Sascha schillerizing, his keenness Aryanising elongated unusably. Los Angeles International Airport Data Kaggle. Book cheap flights to Los Angeles International Airport on CheapOair Explore flight deals on LAX flight tickets. Los Angeles International Airport Boutique Air. Flights from Dubai to Los Angeles DXB to LAX Flights Flight. Arrival Flights as of 60719 101229 PM PST Refresh to Search Arrival Flights. You to buy your flight simulator for bringing a cargo shipments in sunny california, transit through social protection, you can be extremely long. Fiji Airways Book Flights from Los Angeles at USD 93. You are eligible to being there are closed until you accept their invitation. 1 Time-Saving Travel Hacks for the LAX Airport. Foreign citizens or regions in and so they want fast, or at the apm platform and thrifty car parking information and money, los angeles international airport flight schedule. Flights to Los Angeles Southwest Airlines. LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTArrivals and JAL. Lax with no access to get regular updates about scheduled for takeoff options include travel to get diagnostic tests if a context object from dubai dxb airport? This flight schedules and international airports across the scheduled for confirming initial project could be added to. Please enter your schedule, scheduled arrival will remain open so they are there are there is a small child of international zone at.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 -- Noise Chapter 10--Noise
    Chapter 10 -- Noise Chapter 10--Noise 10.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................10-1 10.1.1 Scope of the Noise Element...........................................................................................10-1 10.1.2 Existing Noise Environment..........................................................................................10-1 10.1.3 Noise Sources & Noise Abatement Techniques ............................................................10-5 10.2 Major Sources of Noise in the City of Merced ...........................................................................10-6 10.2.1 Vehicular Noise.............................................................................................................10-6 10.2.2 Rail Traffic Noise ........................................................................................................10-13 10.2.3 Aircraft Noise..............................................................................................................10-19 10.2.4 Other Sources of Noise ................................................................................................10-23 10.3 Noise Goals, Policies and Actions ............................................................................................10-31 10.4 Technical Data..........................................................................................................................10-38 10.4.1 Basic Characteristics of Noise .....................................................................................10-38
    [Show full text]
  • Where Are Laanc Facilities in My Area?
    WHERE ARE LAANC FACILITIES IN MY AREA? Updated with LAANC Expansion Facilities! December 2019 Houston Air Route Traffic Control Center (ZHU) Brownsville/South Padre Island International Airport (BRO), Mobile Regional Airport (MOB), Salina Regional Airport (SLN), South Central Brownsville, TX Mobile, AL Salina, KS Easterwood Field (CLL), Baton Rouge Metropolitan Airport (BTR), Philip Billard Municipal Airport (TOP), College Station, TX Baton Rouge, LA Topeka, KS Conroe-North Houston Regional Airport (CXO), Lafayette Regional Airport (LFT), Mount Vernon Airport (MVN), Houston, TX Lafayette, LA Mt Vernon, IL Scholes International At Galveston Airport (GLS), Austin–Bergstrom International Airport (AUS), Quincy Regional Airport (UIN), Galveston, TX Austin, TX Quincy, IL Georgetown Municipal Airport (GTU), Corpus Christi International Airport (CRP), Chanute Martin Johnson Airport (CNU), Georgetown, TX Corpus Christi, TX Chanute, KS Valley International Airport (HRL), Aransas County Airport (RKP), Dodge City Regional Airport (DDC), Harlingen, TX Rockport, TX Dodge City, KS San Marcos Regional Airport (HYI), San Antonio International Airport (SAT), Emporia Municipal Airport (EMP), Austin, TX San Antonio, TX Emporia, KS Laredo International Airport (LRD), Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport (MSY), Hays Regional Airport (HYS), Laredo, TX Kenner, LA St, Hays, KS McAllen Miller International Airport (MFE), William P. Hobby Airport (HOU), Lawrence Municipal Airport (LWC), McAllen, TX Houston, TX Lawrence, KS Sugar Land Regional Airport
    [Show full text]