DOCSLIB.ORG

Robert Shulman Defendant-Appellant

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Robert Shulman Defendant-Appellant COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK People of the State of New York, Respondent - against – Robert Shulman Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK AS AMICUS CURIAE Joshua L. Dratel* Committee on Capital Punishment, Ass’n of the Bar of the City of New York 14 Wall Street, 28th floor New York, New York 10005 (212) 732-0707 *Counsel of record for Amicus Curiae 21569547v1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..................................................................................................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .............................................................................................iii FEDERAL CASES ................................................................................................iii NEW YORK STATE CASES ...............................................................................iii STATUTES..........................................................................................................viii OTHER AUTHORITIES.....................................................................................viii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ................................................................................... 1 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ........................... 3 ARGUMENT...................................................................................................................... 5 I. THE STRICT SCUTINY STANDARD APPLIES TO NEW YORK SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS CLAIMS INVOLVING THE DEATH PENALTY .............................................................................................................. 6 A. New York’s Substantive Due Process Standard Is More Expansive than the Federal Standard............................................................................ 7 B. New York State Imposes the Strictest Scrutiny for the Fundamental Right to Life........................................................................ 10 II. NEW YORK’S DEATH PENALTY STATUTE DOES NOT PASS THE STRICT SCRUTINY TEST, AND THEREFORE IT VIOLATES THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE ................................................................................... 17 A. The Death Penalty Does Not Deter Crime, Let Alone by the Least Restrictive Method.................................................................................... 18 1. There is No Statistical Correlation Between the Death Penalty and the Murder Rate in New York................................... 19 2. There Is No Statistical Correlation Between the Death Penalty and the Murder Rate Generally........................................ 23 3. Criminal Justice Authorities Endorse the Findings of Social Science that the Death Penalty Does Not Deter Violent Crime............................................................................................. 25 B. The Death Penalty Is Not the Least Restrictive Method for Incapacitating Criminals ........................................................................... 27 C. Retribution Is Not a Compelling State Interest Nor Is the Death Penalty the Least Restrictive Method of Retribution................................ 30 i 21569547v1 III. OTHER STATES, INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITIES AND OTHER SOURCES SHOW THAT NEW YORK’S DEATH PENALTY FAILS THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE MEANS TEST AND VIOLATES DUE PROCESS ............................................................................................................. 34 A. Twelve Other States Without the Death Penalty Achieve the Same Governmental Interests as States With the Death Penalty........................ 34 B. The Death Penalty is Not Necessary Because the World Community Has Rejected the Death Penalty............................................ 36 C. The Reasoining of Major Religions and Philosophers Further Supports that the Death Penalty Fails the Least Restrictive Means Test............................................................................................................ 39 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................. 43 ii 21569547v1 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES FEDERAL CASES Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)................................................................................................ 4 Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).............................................................................................. 10 Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).......................................................................................... 7, 32 Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976)........................................................................................ 25, 40 Sell v. United States, 123 S. Ct. 2174 (2003)............................................................................................ 9 Sumner v. Shuman, 483 U.S. 66 (1987)................................................................................................ 33 Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976).............................................................................................. 14 NEW YORK STATE CASES People v. Adams, 53 N.Y.2d 241, 440 N.Y.S.2d 902 (1981) .............................................................. 7 People v. Alvarez, 70 N.Y.2d 375, 521 N.Y.S.2d 212 (1987) .............................................................. 7 People v. Arthur, 175 Misc.2d 742, 673 N.Y.S.2d 486 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1997) .................................. 14 Asian Americans for Equality v. Koch, 72 N.Y.2d 121, 531 N.Y.S.2d 782 (1988) ............................................................ 11 iii 21569547v1 Barker v. People, 3 Cow. 686, 15 Am. Dec. 322, 1824 WL 2277 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1824).................. 16 People v. Bishop, 66 A.D. 415, 73 N.Y.S. 226 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dept. 1901)............................. 16 People v. Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100, 371 N.Y.S.2d 471 (1975) .............................................................. 3 Broadway Catering Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 106 Misc.2d 1025, 436 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1980) ................................ 11 People v. Cates, 104 A.D.2d 895, 480 N.Y.S.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dept. 1984).................. 14 People v. Chapleau, 121 N.Y. 266 (1890) ............................................................................................. 15 City of Amsterdam v. Helsby, 37 N.Y.2d 19, 371 N.Y.S.2d 404 (1975) ................................................................ 6 People v. Cole, 152 A.D.2d 851, 544 N.Y.S.2d 228 (N.Y. App. Div. 3rd Dept. 1989) ................ 14 Cooper v. Morin, 49 N.Y.2d 69, 424 N.Y.S.2d 168 (1979) ............................................................ 8, 9 People v. Davis, 43 N.Y.2d 17, 400 N.Y.S.2d 735 (1977) ........................................................ 10, 19 People v. Fitzpatrick, 32 N.Y.2d 499, 346 N.Y.S.2d 793 (1973) ...................................................... 19, 21 People v. Foley, 94 N.Y.2d 668, 709 N.Y.S.2d 467 (2000) ............................................................ 12 Fosmire v. Nicoleau, 75 N.Y.2d 218, 551 N.Y.S.2d 876 (1990) .............................................................. 9 People v. Fox, 175 Misc.2d 333, 669 N.Y.S.2d 470 (N.Y. County Ct. 1997).............................. 12 Freeman v. People, 4 Denio 9, 47 Am. Dec. 216, 1847 WL 4116 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1847)..................... 15 iv 21569547v1 Golden v. Clark, 76 N.Y.2d 618, 563 N.Y.S.2d 1 (1990) ................................................................ 11 People v. Gordon, 175 Misc.2d 67, 667 N.Y.S.2d 626 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1997) .................................... 14 People v. Hale, 173 Misc.2d 140, 661 N.Y.S.2d 457 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1997) ................................. 31 People v. Hansen, 9 N.Y.2d 339 (N.Y. 2003) ...................................................................................... 3 People v. Harris, 98 N.Y.2d 452 (2002) ............................................................................................. 4 People v. Hovey, 5 Barb. 117, 1849 WL 5057 (N.Y. Sup. Gen. Term 1849)................................... 14 Immuno AG v. Moor-Jankowski, 77 N.Y.2d 235, 566 N.Y.S.2d 906 (1991) ............................................................ 10 In re Andrea B., 94 Misc.2d 919, 405 N.Y.S.2d 977 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1978) ................................... 13 In re Harry M., 96 A.D.2d 201, 468 N.Y.S.2d 359 (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dept. 1983).................... 13 In re Marie B., 62 N.Y.2d 352, 477 N.Y.S.2d 87 (1984) .............................................................. 11 In re O'Connor, 72 N.Y.2d 517, 534 N.Y.S.2d 886 (1988) ...................................................... 13, 31 In re Quinton A., 49 N.Y.2d 328, 425 N.Y.S.2d 788 (1980) ............................................................ 11 In re Sylvia M., 82 A.D.2d 217, 443 N.Y.S.2d 214 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dept. 1981)................... 13 People v. Isaacson, 44 N.Y.2d 511, 406 N.Y.S.2d 714 (1978) ........................................................ 9, 10 People v. Jackson, 14 N.Y.2d 5, 247 N.Y.S.2d 481 (1964) ................................................................ 17 v 21569547v1 People v. Kelhoffer, 181 Misc. 731, 48 N.Y.S.2d 771 (N.Y. County Ct. 1943).................................... 15 People v. Koertge, 182 Misc.2d 183, 701 N.Y.S.2d 588 (N.Y. Dist. Ct. 1998).................................... 7 People v. Leyra, 302 N.Y. 353 (1951) ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Presentations of the Self As Author in Prefaces and Autobiographies. (Volumes I and II)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1990 Authorial Introductions: Presentations of the Self as Author in Prefaces and Autobiographies. (Volumes I and II). Laurie Frances Leach Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Leach, Laurie Frances, "Authorial Introductions: Presentations of the Self as Author in Prefaces and Autobiographies. (Volumes I and II)." (1990). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4998. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4998 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheating Justice by Cheating Death
    CHEATING JUSTICE BY CHEATING DEATH: THE DOCTRINAL COLLISION FOR PROSECUTING FOREIGN TERRORISTS – PASSAGE OF AUT DEDERE AUT JUDICARE INTO CUSTOMARY LAW & REFUSAL TO EXTRADITE BASED ON THE DEATH PENALTY Michael J. Kelly* The purpose of foreign policy is not to provide an outlet for our own sentiment of hope or indignation; it is to shape real events in a real world. – President John F. Kennedy, Mormon Tabernacle, Salt Lake City, Utah (Sept. 26, 1963)1 I. INTRODUCTION In December 2002, Denmark released a Chechen terrorist rather than extraditing him to Russia where he might face the death penalty.2 Britain refused to honor an Egyptian request to arrest and extradite a terrorist implicated in the 1995 assassination attempt against President Mubarak, as conviction for that crime carried the death penalty.3 Mexico also declined to extradite twenty-six suspects to the United States who would face the death penalty for their alleged crimes.4 What happens when Osama bin Laden or other terrorists surface in countries that refuse to extradite them to requesting states where capital punishment is a sentencing option? The tension between justice and mercy is a taught one, often wrapping legal strictures in religious or moral garb.5 However, the debate reaches no higher pitch than with regard to the appropriateness of capital punishment. Some societies, like the United States, handle the question on a jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis in accord with principles of federalism, while others, like Canada, handle it at the national level. Whatever the internal accommodations may be, national governments must decide whether domestic sentiment will * Assistant Professor of Law, Creighton University.
    [Show full text]
  • Counterinsurgency in Southern Sudan: the Means to Win? Roger C
    Document generated on 09/27/2021 1:20 a.m. Journal of Conflict Studies Counterinsurgency in Southern Sudan: The Means to Win? Roger C. Glickson Volume 15, Number 1, Spring 1995 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/jcs15_01art03 See table of contents Publisher(s) The University of New Brunswick ISSN 1198-8614 (print) 1715-5673 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Glickson, R. C. (1995). Counterinsurgency in Southern Sudan:: The Means to Win? Journal of Conflict Studies, 15(1), 45–59. All rights reserved © Centre for Conflict Studies, UNB, 1995 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Counterinsurgency in Southern Sudan: The Means to Win? by Roger C. Glickson Roger C. Glickson is a Political-Military Analyst with Science Applications International Corporation in Arlington, Virginia. INTRODUCTION Since early 1992. the Sudanese Government has made a concerted effort to conclude militarily its long-running civil war with the southern-based Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA), led by John Garang. While Khartoum initially made serious inroads into insurgent-held territory, these gains were confined largely to former rebel garrisons, leaving the SPLA controlling much of the countryside. Moreover, the insurgents exacted a terrible price in terms of the number of government soldiers killed, while the financial cost of the escalated fighting took a continued toll on the Sudanese economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Amendment and Film Censorship from 1915-1952, 41 Hastings Const
    Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly Volume 41 Article 4 Number 2 Winter 2014 1-1-2014 From Spectacle to Speech: The irsF t Amendment and Film Censorship from 1915-1952 Jessica J. Hwang Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Jessica J. Hwang, From Spectacle to Speech: The First Amendment and Film Censorship from 1915-1952, 41 Hastings Const. L.Q. 381 (2014). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol41/iss2/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Spectacle to Speech: The First Amendment and Film Censorship from 1915-1952 by JESSICA J. HWANG* Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. - U.S. CONST. amend. I Introduction The First Amendment, often hailed as the great protector of free expression and speech, has not always meant what it means to us today. Though it boldly prohibits Congress from enacting any law "abridging the freedom of speech," the exact meaning of that phrase has changed over time. The modern First Amendment grants "special protection" to "speech on matters of public concern."' And though the United States Supreme Court recently referred to the First Amendment as "the essence of self-government,"2 such a view * J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical and Pragmatic Links Between US Foreign Policy and Immigration Policy
    Philosophical and Pragmatic Links Between US Foreign Policy and Immigration Policy The Case of El Salvador Bridget O’Neill November 21, 2018 1 In the American imaginary, discourse surrounding both foreign policy conduct and immigration are parallel: both are vague and self-idealizing frameworks. Foreign policy decisions reduce global enemies to figures of external evil and posit American troops as saviors; military myths purposefully leave little room for criticism. There is a disconnect between self- idealizing rhetoric in American foreign policy and the specific and often covert violence carried out under broad, moralistic justifications. Similarly, despite the popular categorization of the US as a “nation of immigrants,” this glorified title implies a fictitious timeless homogeneity; it offers no historical texture to a constant renegotiation of who belongs and who doesn’t. The lack of specificity or consensus regarding an immigration philosophy (more concretely, the lack of any codified criteria to evaluate asylum applications with) is exactly what enables immigration policy to become deployed in specific and disparate ways. Within the nation of immigrants, immigrants exist in hyper-policed political limbo. The idealized version of American immigration and its violent reality are imagined as separate entities, even though the latter underpins the former. The same distance is used to avoid acknowledging that foreign invasion destabilizes countries and drives the emigration that Americans subsequently police: establishing a causal link implies responsibility. The ideological web is held intact only because the romanticized conceptualizations do not break down: historical reinforcement have posited these claims as crucial to American national identity. These myths are believed with sincerity -- by necessity.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    Book Reviews to send him to Georgetown University for a BRACETE $10.95 DROPS OF REMEMBRANCE preparatory, graduate-level immigration law BY Juan M. Bracete course taught by Charles Gordon. Bracete Vantage Press, New York, NY, 2012. 66 pages, $10.95. grabbed the opportunityDrops of Remembrance ,and the bracing soon new memoir com from- author Juan Bracete, recounts his years as a U.S. Immigration Judge, menced work withand the the following Board period whenof Immigrationhe worked as a U.S. Foreign Service officer. Mr. Bracete relates some of the many incidents Reviewed by R. Mark Frey Appeals. Later, hebecause observed, and ofsupplies his poignant grandfather’s anecdotes regarding his terminal illness,work, he as quit well as biographicalhis job notesand about returned the nature of his job and how it profoundly shaped his career. In writing his memoir, OF DROPS A career in the United States Foreign to Puerto Rico.Bracete Bracete acts on his long-heldinitially desire to despairedshare with his readers the R totality of his life experience, and his search for ways continu- E M E Service—the allure of exotic locales, climes, about his employmentally to improve hisprospects journey through life.in Puerto MB RANCE OF cultures, and peoples, has caused many of Rico, but, as he notes, “God provides for DROPS us to consider it. It can be a great way to see madmen, children and fools,” and, not long JUAN BRACETE was born and raised in Puerto Rico. Having earned REMEMBRANCE the world and possibly play a role in world after returning,his he B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Countdown to Martial Law: the U.S-Philippine Relationship, 1969
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Graduate Masters Theses Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses 8-31-2016 Countdown to Martial Law: The .SU -Philippine Relationship, 1969-1972 Joven G. Maranan University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses Part of the Asian History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Maranan, Joven G., "Countdown to Martial Law: The .SU -Philippine Relationship, 1969-1972" (2016). Graduate Masters Theses. 401. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses/401 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COUNTDOWN TO MARTIAL LAW: THE U.S.-PHILIPPINE RELATIONSHIP, 1969-1972 A Thesis Presented by JOVEN G. MARANAN Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies, University of Massachusetts Boston, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2016 History Program © 2016 by Joven G. Maranan All rights reserved COUNTDOWN TO MARTIAL LAW: THE U.S.-PHILIPPINE RELATIONSHIP 1969-1972 A Thesis Presented by JOVEN G. MARANAN Approved as to style and content by: ________________________________________________ Vincent Cannato, Associate Professor Chairperson of Committee ________________________________________________ David Hunt, Professor Member ________________________________________________ Christopher Capozzola, Associate Professor MIT Member _________________________________________ Vincent Cannato, Program Director History Graduate Program _________________________________________ Tim Hascsi, Chairperson History Department ABSTRACT COUNTDOWN TO MARTIAL LAW: THE U.S.-PHILIPPINE RELATIONSHIP, 1969-1972 August 2016 Joven G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Massacre at El Mozote
    March 4, 1992 Volume No. IV, Issue No. 2 EL SALVADOR THE MASSACRE AT EL MOZOTE: THE NEED TO REMEMBER Introduction With the negotiated cease-fire agreement signed on January 16, 1992, in Introduction ..................................................1 Mexico City, the twelve-year-old conflict in The Massacre of El Mozote ........................3 El Salvador has formally come to an end. The Massacre Becomes Known .................5 The agreements under United Nations The Lack of Press Coverage in supervision between the Salvadoran El Salvador........................................5 government and the Farabundo Martí U.S. Press Accounts of the Massacre..6 National Liberation Front (FMLN) envision The Reagan Administration Response.....7 unprecedented reforms: to reduce the Congressional Hearings .......................9 military, dissolve the elite, immediate- The Atlacatl Battalion and U.S. Policy ...11 U.S. Government Response reaction battalions, eliminate two of the to Massacres ...................................15 security forces, create a new National Civil The "Official Story"..............................16 Police, and demobilize the FMLN and fully The Current Status of the Case................16 integrate ex-guerrillas into civilian life. These transformations hold forth the greatest possibility yet for the respect for human rights and the achievement of social justice in El Salvador. Two provisions of the peace agreement touch more directly on the question of human rights. In April 1991, the negotiating parties agreed to the formation of a Commission on Truth, which would review "grave acts of violence which have occurred since 1980 and whose mark on society demands with great urgency public knowledge of the truth." In September 1991, the Salvadoran government and the FMLN agreed to a process of "purification" of the armed forces, to be carried out by an ad hoc Commission, which would review the records of military officers with a special focus on their human rights records.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics, Power and Chiefship in Famine and War a Study Of
    SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES pROjECT POLITICS, POWER AND CHIEFSHIP IN FAMINE AND WAR A STUDY OF THE FORMER NORTHERN BAHR el-ghazal STATE, SOUTH SUDAN RIfT vAllEY INSTITUTE SOUTH SUDAN customary authorities Politics, power and chiefship in famine and war A study of the former Northern Bahr el-Ghazal state, South Sudan NICKI KINDERSLEY Published in 2018 by the Rift Valley Institute PO Box 52771 GPO, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya 107 Belgravia Workshops, London N19 4NF, United Kingdom THE RIFT VALLEY INSTITUTE (RVI) The Rift Valley Institute (www.riftvalley.net) works in eastern and central Africa to bring local knowledge to bear on social, political and economic development. THE AUTHOR Nicki Kindersley is a historian of the Sudans. She is currently Harry F. Guggenheim Research Fellow at Pembroke College, Cambridge University, and a Director of Studies on the RVI Sudan and South Sudan Course. THE RESEARCH TEAM The research was designed and conducted with co-researcher Joseph Diing Majok and research assistant Paulino Dhieu Tem. SOUTH SUDAN CUSTOMARY AUTHORITIES (SSCA) PROJECT RVI’s South Sudan Customary Authorities Project seeks to deepen the understand- ing of the changing role of chiefs and traditional authorities in South Sudan. CREDITS RVI EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Mark Bradbury RVI ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH & COMMUNICATIONS: Cedric Barnes RVI SOUTH SUDAN PROGRAMME MANAGER: Anna Rowett RVI SENIOR PROGRAMME MANAGER: Tymon Kiepe EDITOR: Kate McGuinness DESIGN: Lindsay Nash MAPS: Jillian Luff,MAPgrafix ISBN 978-1-907431-54-8 COVER: A chiefs’ meeting in Malualkon in Aweil East, South Sudan. RIGHTS Copyright © Rift Valley Institute 2017 Cover image © Nicki Kindersley Text and maps published under Creative Commons License Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Available for free download from www.riftvalley.net Printed copies are available from Amazon and other online retailers.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Benefits of Literature in Law, and Their Limits
    Mississippi College Law Review Volume 35 Issue 1 Vol. 35 Iss. 1 Article 8 2017 Practical Benefits of Literature in Law, and their Limits James L. Robertson Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.law.mc.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Custom Citation 35 Miss. C. L. Rev. 266 (2016-2017) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by MC Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mississippi College Law Review by an authorized editor of MC Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRACTICAL BENEFITS OF LITERATURE IN LAW, AND THEIR LIMITS James L. Robertson* My literature is confined to the effort to make it in the form of judicial decisions, and I occasionally manage to slip a phrase past the negative vigilance of my brethren. - 0. W. Holmes to Lewis Einstein (1914) I. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW The job description for a good judge should include "the wisdom of Solomon, the patience of Job and the humanity of Shakespeare." 2 Many do not always understand the humanity component. At best we sense it least, but this is like not sensing how our lives would be lacking if all music had ended with Mozart, if we never had Beethoven's odd number symphonies, Wagner or the great Russians among whom only Tchaikovsky is appreciated appropriately. Or if baseball had remained in the Dead Ball Era, so that we celebrated only the glories of Cy Young and Ty Cobb and Honus Wagner. Or if we had nothing beyond Newtonian physics with which to understand and explore the natural world, or could see only what Galileo could see of the wonders of the Universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues for Congress
    Papua, Indonesia: Issues for Congress January 19, 2006 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33260 Papua, Indonesia: Issues for Congress Summary The ongoing investigation into the killing of two American citizens, current human rights conditions, and reports of an Indonesian military build-up in Papua have led to increased Congressional attention to Indonesia’s eastern-most territory. Papua, for the purposes of this report, refers to the resource rich western half of the island of New Guinea and not the nation or people of Papua New Guinea which is situated on the eastern half of the Island. While the people of Papua have been subject to human rights abuses while under Indonesian rule, the ongoing expansion of democracy and civil society in Indonesia and the leadership of President Yudhoyono hold out the possibility that the human rights situation in Papua may improve. Some view the current improvement in the bilateral relationship between the United States and Indonesia as providing an enhanced opportunity for the United States to continue to support the expansion of democracy, the rule of law, civil society, and human rights while developing closer military-to- military relations with a valuable partner in the war against terror and a key geopolitical actor in the Southeast Asian region. Such policies, by fostering a more democratic and open society, may also contribute to an improved human rights situation in Papua. Others, including some Members of Congress, contend that Indonesia’s failure thus far to bring to trial those responsible for the Timika incident and other human rights abuses, suggests that the Indonesian military (TNI) remains, at least in part, outside government control and that the United States should continue to suspend some kinds of military assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining in Conflicted Lands
    Lessons learned from Case Studies of InternationalInternational Investment Financial in Extractive Flows and Land-use Industries and the Environment Best Practices for Transnational Investment in Extractive and Land Use Sectors School of International Service American University Foreword With the wave of globalization and the empowerment of civil societies around the world, foreign investment has become an increasingly important issue due to the inherent social and environmental impacts that foreign companies inflict upon the local communities in which they operate. The results of foreign investment are complicated: some investment improves local economic, environmental, and social conditions, while other investment leads to tensions between transnational companies and local communities. There are currently few broadly agreed-upon standards that guide how foreign companies should invest and behave in host countries in order to achieve not only business benefits, but also social responsibility and environmental sustainability. This portfolio of best and worst practices of foreign investment exhibits both positive and negative cases of foreign investment. This document is the cooperative product of the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the American University (AU) practicum team. IFFE’s Senior Associate, Mr. Hu Tao, and Research Analyst, Denise Leung, worked closely with the practicum team to develop the project. The AU practicum team consisted of professors Dr. Ken Conca and Dr. Judy Shapiro and eleven graduate students: Stephanie DaCosta, Kristin DeValue, Hilary Kirwan, Lauren Lane, John Noel, Sebastian O’Connor, Schuyler Olsson, Jen Richmond, Natnari Sihawong, Toussaint Webster, and Yuxi Zhao. In March 2013, the AU practicum team travelled to Beijing, China, to present their initial research and coordinate with a WRI partner research team from Beijing Normal University.
    [Show full text]