Species List the Following Tree and Shrub Species Are Currently in Tree Advisor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Species List the Following Tree and Shrub Species Are Currently in Tree Advisor Species List The following tree and shrub species are currently in Tree Advisor. Species are linked to USDA PLANTS Database to provide additional information. Mature height in the Great Plains is typically less than what is indicated in national databases, such as the USDA PLANTS Database which specifies ideal growing conditions. The Great Plains is the fringe or outside of the native ranges of most species, has a relatively harsh climate for trees and shrubs, and, consequently, they generally do not grow as large here as they do nearer the heart of their native ranges. Tree Advisor considers expected mature heights in the Great Plains. Acer ginnala – Amur Maple Celtis occidentalis – Hackberry Acer grandidentatum – Bigtooth Maple Celtis laevigata – Sugarberry Acer negundo – Boxelder Cercis canadensis – Redbud Acer rubrum – Red Maple Chilopsis linearis – Desert Willow Acer saccharinum – Silver Maple Corylus americana – American Hazelnut Acer saccharum ¬ Sugar Maple Corylus cornuta – Beaked Hazelnut Aesculus glabra – Ohio Buckeye Cornus racemosa – Gray Dogwood Alnus incana – Gray Alder Cornus sericea – Redosier Dogwood Amelanchier alnifolia – Saskatoon Serviceberry Crataegus crus–galli – Cockspur Hawthorn Amelanchier utahensis – Utah Serviceberry Crataegus mollis – Downy Hawthorn Amorpha fruticosa – False Indigo Diospyros virginiana – Persimmon Aronia melanocarpa – Black Chokeberry Elaeagnus commutata –Silverberry Asimina triloba – Pawpaw Fallugia paradoxa – Apache Plume Betula nigra – River Birch Fraxinus americana – White Ash Betula papyrifera – Paper Birch Fraxinus pennsylvanica – Green Ash Caragana arborescens – Siberian Peashrub Gleditsia triacanthos – Honeylocust Carpinus caroliniana – American Hornbeam Gymnocladus dioicus – Kentucky Coffeetree Carya illinoinensis – Pecan Juglans major – Arizona Walnut Catalpa speciosa – Northern Catalpa Juglans microcarpa – Little Walnut USDA National Agroforestry Center Juglans nigra – Black Walnut Quercus palustris – Pin Oak Juniperus scopulorum – Rocky Mountain Juniper Quercus rubra – Northern Red Oak Juniperus virginiana – Eastern Redcedar Rhus aromatica – Fragrant Sumac Maclura pomifera – Osage Orange Rhus trilobata – Skunkbush Malus baccata – Siberian Crabapple Ribes aureum – Golden Currant Morus rubra – Red Mulberry Robinia neomexicana – New Mexico Locust Ostrya virginiana – Eastern Hophornbeam Robinia pseudoacacia – Black Locust Physocarpus opulifolius – Ninebark Rosa woodsii – Woods’ Rose Picea pungens – Blue Spruce Salix amygdaloides – Peachleaf Willow Picea abies – Norway Spruce Salix bebbiana – Bebb Willow Picea glauca var. densata – Black Hills Spruce Salix discolor – Pussy Willow Pinus nigra – Austrian Pine Salix interior – Sandbar Willow Pinus ponderosa – Ponderosa Pine Salix nigra – Black Willow Pinus sylvestris – Scotch Pine Sambucus nigra ssp. canadensis – American Black Elderberry Platanus occidentalis – American Sycamore Sapindus saponaria var. drummondii – Western Populus angustifolia – Narrowleaf Cottonwood Soapberry Populus balsamifera – Balsam Poplar Shepherdia argentea – Silver Buffaloberry Populus deltoides – Eastern Cottonwood Symphoricarpos occidentalis – Western Populus tremuloides – Quaking Aspen Snowberry Prunus americana – American Plum Syringa vulgaris – Common Lilac Prunus angustifolia – Chickasaw Plum Taxodium distichum – Baldcypress Prunus pumila var. besseyi – Western Thuja occidentalis – Arborvitae Sandcherry Tilia americana – Basswood Prunus serotina – Black Cherry Ulmus americana – American Elm Prunus tomentosa – Nanking Cherry Viburnum lentago – Nannyberry Prunus virginiana – Chokecherry Viburnum opulus var. americanum – American Pyrus ussuriensis – Ussurian or Harbin Pear Cranberrybush Quercus fusiformis – Texas Live Oak Quercus macrocarpa – Bur Oak USDA National Agroforestry Center .
Recommended publications
  • Caragana Or Siberian Peashrub
    Caragana or Siberian Peashrub slide 5a 400% slide 5b 360% slide 5d slide 5c 360% 360% III-7 Caragana or Environmental Requirements Siberian Peashrub Soils Soil Texture - Adapted to a wide range of soils. (Caragana Soil pH - 5.0 to 8.0. arborescens) Windbreak Suitability Group - 1, 1K, 3, 4, 4C, 5, 6D, 6G, 8, 9C, 9L. General Description Cold Hardiness USDA Zone 2. Drought tolerant legume, long-lived, alkaline-tolerant, tall shrub native to Siberia. Ability to withstand extreme cold Water and dryness. Major windbreak species. Drought tolerant. Does not perform well on very wet or very dry sandy soils. Leaves and Buds Bud Arrangement - Alternate. Light Bud Color - Light brown, chaffy in nature. Full sun. Bud Size - 1/8 inch, weakly imbricate. Leaf Type and Shape - Pinnately-compound, 8 to 12 Uses leaflets per leaf. Conservation/Windbreaks Leaf Margins - Entire. Medium to tall shrub for farmstead and field windbreaks Leaf Surface - Pubescent in early spring, later glabrescent. and highway beautification. Leaf Length - 1½ to 3 inches; leaflets 1/2 to 1 inch. Wildlife Leaf Width - 1 to 2 inches; leaflets 1/3 to 2/3 inch. Used for nesting by several species of songbirds. Food Leaf Color - Light-green, become dark green in summer; source for hummingbirds. yellow fall color. Agroforestry Products Flowers and Fruits No known products. Flower Type - Small, pea-like. Flower Color - Showy yellow in spring. Urban/Recreational Fruit Type - Pod, with multiple seeds. Pods open with a Screening and border, ornamental flowers in spring. popping sound when ripe. Cultivated Varieties Fruit Color - Brown when mature.
    [Show full text]
  • Legumes of the North-Central States: C
    LEGUMES OF THE NORTH-CENTRAL STATES: C-ALEGEAE by Stanley Larson Welsh A Dissertation Submitted, to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Subject: Systematic Botany Approved: Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for privacy. artment Signature was redacted for privacy. Dean of Graduat College Iowa State University Of Science and Technology Ames, Iowa I960 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORICAL ACCOUNT 3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 8 TAXONOMIC AND NOMENCLATURE TREATMENT 13 REFERENCES 158 APPENDIX A 176 APPENDIX B 202 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express his deep gratitude to Professor Duane Isely for assistance in the selection of the problem and for the con­ structive criticisms and words of encouragement offered throughout the course of this investigation. Support through the Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station and through the Industrial Science Research Institute made possible the field work required in this problem. Thanks are due to the curators of the many herbaria consulted during this investigation. Special thanks are due the curators of the Missouri Botanical Garden, U. S. National Museum, University of Minnesota, North Dakota Agricultural College, University of South Dakota, University of Nebraska, and University of Michigan. The cooperation of the librarians at Iowa State University is deeply appreciated. Special thanks are due Dr. G. B. Van Schaack of the Missouri Botanical Garden library. His enthusiastic assistance in finding rare botanical volumes has proved invaluable in the preparation of this paper. To the writer's wife, Stella, deepest appreciation is expressed. Her untiring devotion, work, and cooperation have made this work possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Forage Availability on Diet Choice and Body Condition in American Beavers (Castor Canadensis)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers National Park Service 2013 The oler of forage availability on diet choice and body condition in American beavers (Castor canadensis) William J. Severud Northern Michigan University Steve K. Windels National Park Service Jerrold L. Belant Mississippi State University John G. Bruggink Northern Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark Severud, William J.; Windels, Steve K.; Belant, Jerrold L.; and Bruggink, John G., "The or le of forage availability on diet choice and body condition in American beavers (Castor canadensis)" (2013). U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers. 124. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark/124 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the National Park Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Mammalian Biology 78 (2013) 87–93 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Mammalian Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mambio Original Investigation The role of forage availability on diet choice and body condition in American beavers (Castor canadensis) William J. Severud a,∗, Steve K. Windels b, Jerrold L. Belant c, John G. Bruggink a a Northern Michigan University, Department of Biology, 1401 Presque Isle Avenue, Marquette, MI 49855, USA b National Park Service, Voyageurs National Park, 360 Highway 11 East, International Falls, MN 56649, USA c Carnivore Ecology Laboratory, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA article info abstract Article history: Forage availability can affect body condition and reproduction in wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Nursery Price List
    Lincoln-Oakes Nurseries 3310 University Drive • Bismarck, ND 58504 Nursery Seed Price List 701-223-8575 • [email protected] The following seed is in stock or will be collected and available for 2010 or spring 2011 PENDING CROP, all climatic zone 3/4 collections from established plants in North Dakota except where noted. Acer ginnala - 18.00/lb d.w Cornus racemosa - 19.00/lb Amur Maple Gray dogwood Acer tataricum - 15.00/lb d.w Cornus alternifolia - 21.00/lb Tatarian Maple Pagoda dogwood Aesculus glabra (ND, NE) - 3.95/lb Cornus stolonifera (sericea) - 30.00/lb Ohio Buckeye – collected from large well performing Redosier dogwood Trees in upper midwest Amorpha canescens - 90.00/lb Leadplant 7.50/oz Amorpha fruiticosa - 10.50/lb False Indigo – native wetland restoration shrub Aronia melanocarpa ‘McKenzie” - 52.00/lb Black chokeberry - taller form reaching 6-8 ft in height, glossy foliage, heavy fruit production, Corylus cornuta (partial husks) - 16.00/lb NRCS release Beaked hazelnut/Native hazelnut (Inquire) Caragana arborescens - 16.00/lb Cotoneaster integerrimus ‘Centennial’ - 32.00/lb Siberian peashrub European cotoneaster – NRCS release, 6-10’ in height, bright red fruit Celastrus scandens (true) (Inquire) - 58.00/lb American bittersweet, no other contaminating species in area Crataegus crus-galli - 22.00/lb Cockspur hawthorn, seed from inermis Crataegus mollis ‘Homestead’ arnoldiana-24.00/lb Arnold hawthorn – NRCS release Crataegus mollis - 19.50/lb Downy hawthorn Elaeagnus angustifolia - 9.00/lb Russian olive Elaeagnus commutata
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Wisconsin Rosids
    Diversity of Wisconsin Rosids . oaks, birches, evening primroses . a major group of the woody plants (trees/shrubs) present at your sites The Wind Pollinated Trees • Alternate leaved tree families • Wind pollinated with ament/catkin inflorescences • Nut fruits = 1 seeded, unilocular, indehiscent (example - acorn) *Juglandaceae - walnut family Well known family containing walnuts, hickories, and pecans Only 7 genera and ca. 50 species worldwide, with only 2 genera and 4 species in Wisconsin Carya ovata Juglans cinera shagbark hickory Butternut, white walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family Leaves pinnately compound, alternate (walnuts have smallest leaflets at tip) Leaves often aromatic from resinous peltate glands; allelopathic to other plants Carya ovata Juglans cinera shagbark hickory Butternut, white walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family The chambered pith in center of young stems in Juglans (walnuts) separates it from un- chambered pith in Carya (hickories) Juglans regia English walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family Trees are monoecious Wind pollinated Female flower Male inflorescence Juglans nigra Black walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family Male flowers apetalous and arranged in pendulous (drooping) catkins or aments on last year’s woody growth Calyx small; each flower with a bract CA 3-6 CO 0 A 3-∞ G 0 Juglans cinera Butternut, white walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family Female flowers apetalous and terminal Calyx cup-shaped and persistant; 2 stigma feathery; bracted CA (4) CO 0 A 0 G (2-3) Juglans cinera Juglans nigra Butternut, white
    [Show full text]
  • A Forever Green Agriculture Initiative
    Developing High-efficiency Agricultural Systems: A Forever Green Agriculture Initiative Donald Wyse, University of Minnesota How did agricultural landscapes lose their diversity? Hansen, MN Exp Sta Protein efficiency 14% 1lb Pork 1,630 gal water 1lb Potatoes 24 gal water ETHANOL FROM CORN Dry Milling Process Grain Grind, Enzyme Digestion Distillers Grains Sugars Yeast, Distillation ETHANOL Conceptual framework for comparing land use and trade-offs of ecosystem services J. A. Foley et al., Science 309, 570 -574 (2005) Published by AAAS What are some of the consequences resulting from the loss of landscape diversity and continuous living soil covers? GGasper, USDA, NRCS Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico 30.0 L. Calcasieu Atchafalaya R. Sabine L. Mississippi R. 29.5 Terrebonne Bay 29.0 latitude (deg.) 28.5 50 km 93.5 92.5 91.5 90.5 89.5 longitude (deg.) bottom dissolved oxygen less than 2.0 mg/L, July 1999 Rabalais et al. 2000 Satellite images of vegetative activity. Areas of annual row cropping April 20 – May 3 Areas of perennial vegetation May 4 – 17 Satellite images of vegetative activity. May 18 - 31 June 15 - 28 Satellite images of vegetative activity. July 13 - 26 October 5 - 18 Annual Tile Drainage Loss in Corn-Soybean Rotation Waseca, 1987-2001 July-March April, May, 29% June 71% Gyles Randall, 2003 Nitrogen Loads long-term average million lbs per year Statewide nitrogen sources to surface waters Urban Septic Feedlot runoff Stormwater 2% <1% 1% Forests 7% Atmospheric Cropland 9% groundwater Point 30% sources 9% Cropland runoff Cropland tile 5% drainage 37% Long Term Nitrogen Reductions 40% Veg.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Trees of Massachusetts
    Native Trees of Massachusetts Common Name Latin Name Eastern White Pine Pinus strobus Common Name Latin Name Mountain Pine Pinus mugo Pin Oak Quercus palustris Pitch Pine Pinus rigida White Oak Quercus alba Red Pine Pinus resinosa Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris Chestnut Oak Quercus montana Jack Pine Pinus banksiana Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides Eastern Hemlock Tsuga canadensis https://plants.usda.gov/ Tamarack Larix laricina core/profile?symbol=P Black Spruce Picea mariana ODE3 White Spruce Picea glauca black willow Salix nigra Red Spruce Picea rubens Red Mulberry Morus rubra Norway Spruce Picea abies American Plum Prunus americana Northern White cedar Thuja occidentalis Canada Plum Prunus nigra Eastern Juniper Juniperus virginiana Black Cherry Prunus serotina Balsam Fir Abies balsamea Canadian Amelanchier canadensis American Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Serviceberry or Witchhazel Hamamelis virginiana Shadbush Honey Locust Gleditsia triacanthos American Mountain Sorbus americana Eastern Redbud Cercis canadensis Ash Yellow-Wood Cladrastis kentukea American Elm Ulmus americana Gray Birch Betula populifolia Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra Grey Alder Alnus incana Basswood Tilia americana Sweet Birch Betula lenta Smooth Sumac Rhus glabra Yellow Birch Betula alleghaniensis Red Maple Acer rubrum Heartleaf Paper Birch Betula cordifolia Horse-Chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum River Birch Betula nigra Staghorn Sumac Rhus typhina Smooth Alder Alnus serrulata Silver Maple Acer saccharinum American Ostrya virginiana Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Hophornbeam Boxelder Acer negundo American Hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana Black Tupelo Nyssa sylvatica Green Alder Alnus viridis Flowering Dogwood Cornus florida Beaked Hazelnut Corylus cornuta Northern Catalpa Catalpa speciosa American Beech Fagus grandifolia Black Ash Fraxinus nigra Black Oak Quercus velutina Devil's Walkingstick Aralia spinosa Downy Hawthorn Crataegus mollis.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6: Invasive Plant Species
    USDA Forest Service Understanding i-Tree – Appendix 6: Invasive Plant Species APPENDIX 6 Invasive Plant Species The following is a list of invasive tree and shrub species by state that are included in i-Tree database (version 6). Each list of invasive species is followed by the reference of the source which were obtained circa 2014. Some of the Web addresses are no longer working; some have been relocated to alternative sites. State-specific invasive species lists will be updated in the future. Alabama Ailanthus altissima Lonicera japonica Poncirus trifoliate Albizia julibrissin Lonicera maackii Pyrus calleryana Ardisia crenata Lonicera morrowii Rosa bracteata Cinnamomum camphora Lonicera x bella Rosa multiflora Elaeagnus pungens Mahonia bealei Triadica sebifera Elaeagnus umbellata Melia azedarach Vernicia fordii Ligustrum japonicum Nandina domestica Wisteria sinensis Ligustrum lucidum Paulownia tomentosa Ligustrum sinense Polygonum cuspidatum Alabama Invasive Plant Council. 2007. 2007 plant list. Athens, GA: Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, Southeast Exotic Pest Plant Council. http://www.se-eppc.org/ alabama/2007plantlist.pdf Alaska Alnus glutinosa Lonicera tatarica Sorbus aucuparia Caragana arborescens Polygonum cuspidatum Cytisus scoparius Prunus padus Alaska National Heritage Program. 2014. Non-Native plant data. Anchorage, AK: University of Alaska Anchorage. http://aknhp.uaa.alaska.edu/botany/akepic/non-native-plant-species- list/#content Arizona Alhagi maurorum Rhus lancea Tamarix parviflora Elaeagnus angustifolia Tamarix aphylla Tamarix ramosissima Euryops multifidus Tamarix chinensis Ulmus pumila Arizona Wildland Invasive Plant Working Group. 2005. Invasive non-native plants that threaten wildlands in Arizona. Phoenix, AZ: Southwest Vegetation Management Association https:// www.swvma.org/wp-content/uploads/Invasive-Non-Native-Plants-that-Threaten-Wildlands-in- Arizona.pdf (Accessed Sept 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Term Fate of Rehabilitated Orphan Black Bears Released in New Hampshire
    Human–Wildlife Interactions 10(2): 258–267, Fall 2016 Short-term fate of rehabilitated orphan black bears released in New Hampshire Wˎ˜˕ˎˢ E. S˖˒˝ˑ1, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 56 College Road, Durham, NH 03824, USA [email protected] Pˎ˝ˎ˛ J. Pˎ˔˒˗˜, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 56 College Road, Durham, NH 03824, USA A˗ˍ˛ˎˠ A. T˒˖˖˒˗˜, New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, 629B Main Street, Lancaster, NH 03584, USA Bˎ˗˓ˊ˖˒˗ K˒˕ˑˊ˖, P.O. Box 37, Lyme, NH 03768, USA Abstract: We evaluated the release of rehabilitated, orphan black bears (Ursus americanus) in northern New Hampshire. Eleven bears (9 males, 2 females; 40–45 kg) were outfi tted with GPS radio-collars and released during May and June of 2011 and 2012. Bears released in 2011 had higher apparent survival and were not observed or reported in any nuisance behavior, whereas no bears released in 2012 survived, and all were involved in minor nuisance behavior. Analysis of GPS locations indicated that bears in 2011 had access to and used abundant natural forages or habitat. Conversely, abundance of soft and hard mast was lower in 2012, suggesting that nuisance behavior, and consequently survival, was inversely related to availability of natural forage. Dispersal from the release site ranged from 3.4–73 km across both years, and no bear returned to the rehabilitation facility (117 km distance). Rehabilitation appears to be a valid method for addressing certain orphan bear issues in New Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • We Hope You Find This Field Guide a Useful Tool in Identifying Native Shrubs in Southwestern Oregon
    We hope you find this field guide a useful tool in identifying native shrubs in southwestern Oregon. 2 This guide was conceived by the “Shrub Club:” Jan Walker, Jack Walker, Kathie Miller, Howard Wagner and Don Billings, Josephine County Small Woodlands Association, Max Bennett, OSU Extension Service, and Brad Carlson, Middle Rogue Watershed Council. Photos: Text: Jan Walker Max Bennett Max Bennett Jan Walker Financial support for this guide was contributed by: • Josephine County Small • Silver Springs Nursery Woodlands Association • Illinois Valley Soil & Water • Middle Rogue Watershed Council Conservation District • Althouse Nursery • OSU Extension Service • Plant Oregon • Forest Farm Nursery Acknowledgements Helpful technical reviews were provided by Chris Pearce and Molly Sullivan, The Nature Conservancy; Bev Moore, Middle Rogue Watershed Council; Kristi Mergenthaler and Rachel Showalter, Bureau of Land Management. The format of the guide was inspired by the OSU Extension Service publication Trees to Know in Oregon by E.C. Jensen and C.R. Ross. Illustrations of plant parts on pages 6-7 are from Trees to Know in Oregon (used by permission). All errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Book formatted & designed by: Flying Toad Graphics, Grants Pass, Oregon, 2007 3 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................ 4 Plant parts ................................................................................... 6 How to use the dichotomous keys ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oberlin's Experimental Hazelnut Orchard: Exploring Woody Agriculture’S Potential for Climate Change Mitigation and Food System Resilience
    Oberlin's Experimental Hazelnut Orchard: Exploring Woody Agriculture’s Potential for Climate Change Mitigation and Food System Resilience By: Naomi Fireman Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 3 1.1 Contextualizing the issue 3 1.2 Woody agriculture as a solution 5 1.3 Hazelnuts, Hybrid Hazelnuts, and Neohybrid Hazelnuts 9 Chapter 2: Biological Background, Fertilization, and Soils 11 Chapter 3: Methods 17 3.1 System Description 17 Management 18 3.2 Initial site conditions, preparation, and planting of trees 18 3.3 Current conditions 19 3.4 Independent and dependent variables 20 3.5 General tree care 20 Data Collection 21 3.6a Harvesting nut/husk clusters 21 3.6b Determining nut and husk biomass 22 3.7a Estimating biomass of woody stems 22 3.7c Developing allometric equations 25 3.8a Estimating leaf biomass 26 3.9 Measuring soil organic matter (SOM) 26 3.10 Statistical analysis 27 Chapter 4: Results 28 4.1 Analysis of covariance: effects of time and fertilizer treatment 28 4.1a Effects of time 28 4.1b Effects of fertilizer 29 4.1c Time and fertilizer treatment interaction 30 4.2 Correlations among variables 32 Chapter 5: Analysis & Discussion 33 5.1 Has the annual allocation of carbon to leaves, woody tissue, and nuts changed over time as the trees have matured? 33 5.2 How much carbon is being stored in the hazelnut system, where is it being stored, and how has this changed over time? 34 5.3 Is fertilization affecting patterns of carbon allocation and long-term storage? 35 5.4 Are these genetically diverse trees capable of producing
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C: Plant Palette
    appendix c: plant pallete plant palette The Plant Palette identifies shade, understory and small trees, shrubs, groundover, perennials and ornamental grasses appropriate for the projects identified within the Urban Greening Plan and consistent with the policy direction defined by the Urban Greening objectives. The Plants defined as part of this plant palette do not represent an exhaustive list of appropriate or approved plants; they were developed to identify context- sensitive plant recommendations for El Cerrito’s streets, parks, and open spaces. This palette may be used to provide plant guidance to private projects interested in achieving the benefits identified by this Plan. This Palette is a living document and may be updated over time to better reflect changing environmental conditions. If the Plant Palette and the City’s current Master Tree List are in conflict, the current Master Tree List will take precedence. SHADE TREES Edible Native Evergreen Evergreen Water Use Water Litter Type Pollinators Deciduous/ Root Damage Landscape Use Creek Interpret Creek Drought Tolerant Drought Desirable Wildlife Biofiltration Planter Scientific Name Common Name Biogenic Emissions Acer macrophyllum Big Leaf Maple ü ü ü ü D M Riparian M High Dry Alnus rhombifolia White Alder ü ü D H Riparian ü High Dry Alnus rubra* Red Alder ü D H Riparian - ü High Dry Betula jaquemontii Birch D H Riparian - ü Mod Dry Screen, Carpinus betulus 'Fastigiata' Fastigiate Hornbeam D M Hedged Low Dry Castanea sativa European Chestnut ü D - - Low Dry Screen, Geijera parvifolia
    [Show full text]