Network Economics: Vodafone Case Study
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
What's Reasonable?: Self-Defense and Mistake in Criminal and Tort
Do Not Delete 12/15/2010 10:20 PM WHAT’S REASONABLE?: SELF-DEFENSE AND MISTAKE IN CRIMINAL AND TORT LAW by Caroline Forell∗ In this Article, Professor Forell examines the criminal and tort mistake- as-to-self-defense doctrines. She uses the State v. Peairs criminal and Hattori v. Peairs tort mistaken self-defense cases to illustrate why application of the reasonable person standard to the same set of facts in two areas of law can lead to different outcomes. She also uses these cases to highlight how fundamentally different the perception of what is reasonable can be in different cultures. She then questions whether both criminal and tort law should continue to treat a reasonably mistaken belief that deadly force is necessary as justifiable self-defense. Based on the different purposes that tort and criminal law serve, Professor Forell explains why in self-defense cases criminal law should retain the reasonable mistake standard while tort law should move to a strict liability with comparative fault standard. I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 1402 II. THE LAW OF SELF-DEFENSE ................................................... 1403 III. THE PEAIRS MISTAKE CASES .................................................. 1406 A. The Peairs Facts ..................................................................... 1408 B. The Criminal Case .................................................................. 1409 1. The Applicable Law ........................................................... 1409 -
Vodafone Automotive VTS S5 Vehicle Tracking System the Future Is Exciting
The ultimate protection for your vehicle Vodafone Automotive VTS S5 Vehicle Tracking System The future is exciting. Ready? Welcome to Vodafone Automotive VTS S5 You’ve invested in your pride and joy. Now, you need the peace of mind knowing that it’s safe: Vodafone Automotive VTS S5 monitors your vehicle so you don’t have to. In 2019, there was theft or unauthorised taking of more than 106,000 vehicles* and the Crime Survey for England & Wales shows that 60% of stolen vehicles are never recovered**. With these trends, it’s no surprise that Insurance companies often require Thatcham approved tracking devices, to be fitted to vehicles which are worth over £50,000. Advancements in vehicle tracking technology, such as Vodafone Automotive VTS S5, is at the forefront of countering these trends. By providing industry-leading, specialist stolen vehicle tracking protection, you can rest assured that if the worst does happen, there’s unparalleled support on hand to retrieve your vehicle as quickly as possible. These systems use the latest GPS/ GPRS/GSM technology, providing pinpoint accuracy and unrivalled service levels, with recovery of vehicles via police liaison conducted in local language through Vodafone Automotive’s network of Secure Operating Centres across 54 countries globally. † We’re a trusted brand You can be assured, major global brands trust Vodafone Automotive and its products. Thatcham accredited and recognised by insurers Vodafone Automotive VTS S5 is Thatcham accredited and recognised by the majority of leading insurers. You may -
Invitation to Subscribe for Shares in Wayfinder Systems AB (Publ) Wayfinder Omslag E 13Sep.Qxd 05-09-13 16.23 Sida II
Wayfinder_omslag_e_13sep.qxd 05-09-13 16.23 Sida I Invitation to subscribe for shares in Wayfinder Systems AB (publ) Wayfinder_omslag_e_13sep.qxd 05-09-13 16.23 Sida II Wayfinder Navigator™ turns your mobile phone into a complete navigation system. Install the software, connect to the GPS and you are ready to navigate throughout Europe and North America. Wayfinder Navigator is a network-based tool that gives you the opportunity to see maps, routes and points-of-interest wherever you are. Turn left in hundred metres Wayfinder_1-60_e_13sep.qxd 05-09-13 16.29 Sida 1 Contents Invitation to subscribe for shares in Wayfinder Systems ....................................................................................................... 3 Conditions and Offer particulars ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Background and reasons.................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Comments by the CEO.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Wayfinder Systems in brief .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Financial -
Competing Theories of Blackmail: an Empirical Research Critique of Criminal Law Theory
Competing Theories of Blackmail: An Empirical Research Critique of Criminal Law Theory Paul H. Robinson,* Michael T. Cahill** & Daniel M. Bartels*** The crime of blackmail has risen to national media attention because of the David Letterman case, but this wonderfully curious offense has long been the favorite of clever criminal law theorists. It criminalizes the threat to do something that would not be criminal if one did it. There exists a rich liter- ature on the issue, with many prominent legal scholars offering their accounts. Each theorist has his own explanation as to why the blackmail offense exists. Most theories seek to justify the position that blackmail is a moral wrong and claim to offer an account that reflects widely shared moral intuitions. But the theories make widely varying assertions about what those shared intuitions are, while also lacking any evidence to support the assertions. This Article summarizes the results of an empirical study designed to test the competing theories of blackmail to see which best accords with pre- vailing sentiment. Using a variety of scenarios designed to isolate and test the various criteria different theorists have put forth as “the” key to blackmail, this study reveals which (if any) of the various theories of blackmail proposed to date truly reflects laypeople’s moral judgment. Blackmail is not only a common subject of scholarly theorizing but also a common object of criminal prohibition. Every American jurisdiction criminalizes blackmail, although there is considerable variation in its formulation. The Article reviews the American statutes and describes the three general approaches these provisions reflect. -
Mobile Data Consumption Continues to Grow – a Majority of Operators Now Rewarded with ARPU
Industry analysis #3 2019 Mobile data – first half 2019 Mobile data consumption continues to grow – a majority of operators now rewarded with ARPU Taiwan: Unlimited is so last year – Korea: 5G boosts usage Tefficient’s 24th public analysis on the development and drivers of mobile data ranks 115 operators based on average data usage per SIM, total data traffic and revenue per gigabyte in the first half of 2019. tefficient AB www.tefficient.com 5 September 2019 1 The data usage per SIM grew for all; everybody climbed our Christmas tree. More than half of the operators could turn that data usage growth into ARPU growth – for the first time a majority is in green. Read on to see who delivered on “more for more” – and who didn’t. Speaking of which, we take a closer look at the development of one of the unlimited powerhouses – Taiwan. Are people getting tired of mobile data? We also provide insight into South Korea – the world’s leading 5G market. Just how much effect did 5G have on the data usage? tefficient AB www.tefficient.com 5 September 2019 2 Fifteen operators now above 10 GB per SIM per month Figure 1 shows the average mobile data usage for 115 reporting or reported1 mobile operators globally with values for the first half of 2019 or for the full year of 2018. DNA, FI 3, AT Zain, KW Elisa, FI LMT, LV Taiwan Mobile, TW 1) FarEasTone, TW 1) Zain, BH Zain, SA Chunghwa, TW 1) *Telia, FI Jio, IN Nova, IS **Maxis, MY Tele2, LV 3, DK Celcom, MY **Digi, MY **LG Uplus, KR 1) Telenor, SE Zain, JO 3, SE Telia, DK China Unicom, CN (handset) Bite, -
Customer Insight Development in Vodafone Italy
Customer Insight development in Vodafone Italy Emanuele Baruffa – Vodafone Seugi - Vienna, 17-19 June 2003 Seugi 21_Vienna Pag. 1 ContentsContents:: 1. Introduction 2. Customer Base Management 3. Customer Insight 4. Data Environment 5. Conclusions Seugi 21_Vienna Pag. 2 1. Introduction 2. Customer Base Management 3. Customer Insight 4. Data Environment 5. Conclusions Seugi 21_Vienna Pag. 3 MobileMobile telephonytelephony isis oneone ofof thethe fastestfastest growinggrowing industriesindustries inin thethe worldworld Worldwide growth in subscribers (millions) ! 1 billion subscribers 1480 around the world 1321 ! Over 120 1152 countries have 958 mobile networks 727 ! Further acceleration 479 expected 206 87 14 34 Source: EITO 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003e 2004e Seugi 21_Vienna Pag. 4 Italy:Italy: Europe’sEurope’s secondsecond biggestbiggest mobilemobile marketmarket Country Subscribers Penetration Western European TLC market % growth by country (%) 10 9,1 9 Germany 60,300,000 84% 8 6,8 6,8 7 6,2 6,1 5,7 5,8 Italy 54,000,000 98% 6 5,6 5,6 5,4 5,0 5 UK 50,900,000 92% 4,0 4 France 39,000,000 77% 3 Spain 34,000,000 88% 2 1 0 Germany Italy UK France Spain Western Europe Sources: internal sources for Italy, Yankee Group for Source: EITO other European countries 2001/2002 2002/2003 Seugi 21_Vienna Pag. 5 PenetrationPenetration raterate inin thethe ItalianItalian marketmarket 60,000 96% 98% 100% 91% Subscribers (,000) 90% 50,000 Penetration Rate 80% 74% 70% 40,000 60% 53% 30,000 50% 36% 40% 20,000 30% 21% 20% 10,000 11% 10% 0 0% 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Seugi 21_Vienna Pag. -
Business Segments Ranging from Small- Proportionate Mobile Customers Across the World
Proportionate mobile customers across the globe. 341.1m (2009: 302.6m; 2008: 260.5m) BrandFinance global ranking 7th most valuable brand (2009: 8th; 2008: 11th) Customers and distribution Customers are at the core of everything we do. Through our products and services we endeavour to address all our customers’ communications needs. International customer base with diverse needs Enterprise Vodafone has a truly international customer base with 341.1 million Vodafone also caters to all business segments ranging from small- proportionate mobile customers across the world. We continually office-home-office (‘SoHo’) and small-medium enterprises (‘SMEs’) to seek to develop new and innovative propositions that deliver relevance corporates and multinational corporations (‘MNCs’). While our core and value to all our customers and build a long lasting relationship mobile voice and data business continues to grow, our enterprise meeting their expectations and needs. As customers move between customers are increasingly asking for combined fixed and mobile work and home environments and look for integrated solutions, solutions for their voice and data needs as well as integrated services we have a suite of propositions which often bundle together and productivity tools. voice, messaging, data and increasingly fixed line services to meet their needs. Brand We have continued to build brand value by delivering a superior, consistent and differentiated customer experience. During the 2010 financial year we evolved our brand positioning to “power to you” emphasising our role of empowering customers to be able to live their lives to the full. It is a further expression of the importance of the customer being central to everything we do and is reinforced in communications substantiating how products and services impact and empower our customers. -
News Release
news release 31 January 2007 VODAFONE REACHES 200 MILLION CUSTOMERS Vodafone Group Plc (“Vodafone”) today announces key performance indicators for the quarter ended 31 December 2006. The main highlights are: • Organic growth of 6.1% for the quarter in proportionate mobile revenue, with proportionate growth of 0.9% in Europe and 14.4% in EMAPA. Nine months year to date organic growth in proportionate mobile revenue of 6.1% • On a statutory basis, growth in total revenue for the quarter was 5.1%, with organic service revenue growth of 4.8% • 8.7 million proportionate organic net mobile additions for the quarter. Total proportionate mobile customer base at 198.6 million at the end of the quarter after a net reduction of 1.7 million mobile customers from other movements, principally business disposals • Total proportionate mobile customer base over 200 million by the end of January • 2.5 million 3G devices added, bringing total 3G device base to 13.6 million. 3G Broadband through HSDPA available across 21 of the Group’s markets and partner networks • Completed disposal of interests in Proximus and Swisscom Mobile with net proceeds of £3.1 billion • Continued execution on revenue stimulation and total communications objectives with Vodafone At Home now launched in seven markets, including five offering DSL services, and Vodafone Office available in 11 markets • Execution of core cost reduction programmes, including IT outsourcing, data centre consolidation, supply chain management and network sharing, all on track • Vodafone re-iterates its current year outlook with the financial performance for the quarter and year to date in line with expectations Arun Sarin, Chief Executive, commented: “These KPIs are very much in line with expectations and show that we are continuing to make progress in executing our strategy. -
Turning a Blind Eye: Perjury in Domestic Violence Cases
Volume 39 Issue 1 Winter Winter 2009 Turning a Blind Eye: Perjury in Domestic Violence Cases Njeri Mathis Rutledge Recommended Citation Njeri M. Rutledge, Turning a Blind Eye: Perjury in Domestic Violence Cases, 39 N.M. L. Rev. 149 (2009). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmlr/vol39/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The University of New Mexico School of Law. For more information, please visit the New Mexico Law Review website: www.lawschool.unm.edu/nmlr TURNING A BLIND EYE: PERJURY IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES NJERI MATHIS RUTLEDGE* INTRODUCTION Accurate testimony is essential to maintaining integrity and justice in the criminal system.' As the Supreme Court stated in In re Michael, all "perjured relevant testimony is at war with justice, since it may produce a judgment not resting on truth. Therefore it cannot be denied that it tends to defeat the sole ultimate objective of a trial."2 Perjurious testimony poses one of the greatest threats to the judicial system. Although perjury3 charges would seem a logical and uncontroversial solution for addressing false statements, the issue becomes murky when false statements arise in domestic violence cases. Expressing frustration over domestic violence cases generally, Judge Atlas commented, "[i]t is simply unacceptable for our process to turn a blind eye to the dangers of such abuse by shrugging our shoulders and saying that nothing can be done within the framework of existing law."4 False statements in domestic violence cases are a significant problem and considered an epidemic with an estimated 40 to 90 percent of domestic violence victims recanting.5 Recanting refers to the act of trying to take back or withdraw a prior statement.6 Because recanting involves an attempt to withdraw a prior statement, it almost always involves falsity in either the original or latter statement. -
Prepared for Upload GCD Wls Networks
LTE‐ LTE‐ REGION COUNTRY OPERATOR LTE Advanced 5G Advanced Pro Western Europe 88 68 1 10 Andorra Total 10 0 0 Andorra Andorra Telecom 10 0 0 Austria Total 33 0 0 Austria A1 Telekom Austria 11 0 0 Austria Hutchison Drei Austria 11 0 0 Austria T‐Mobile Austria (Magenta Telekom) 11 0 0 Belgium Total 33 0 0 Belgium Orange Belgium 11 0 0 Belgium Proximus 11 0 0 Belgium Telenet (incl. BASE) 11 0 0 Denmark Total 54 0 0 Denmark Hi3G Access (3) 11 0 0 Denmark Net 1 Denmark 10 0 0 Denmark TDC (YouSee) 11 0 0 Denmark Telenor Denmark 11 0 0 Denmark Telia Denmark 11 0 0 Finland Total 53 0 1 Finland Aland Telecommunications (Alcom) 10 0 0 Finland DNA Finland 11 0 0 Finland Elisa Corporation 11 0 1 Finland Telia Finland (formerly Sonera) 11 0 0 Finland Ukkoverkot (Ukko Mobile) 10 0 0 France Total 44 0 0 France Altice France (SFR) 11 0 0 France Bouygues Telecom 11 0 0 France Free Mobile (Iliad) 11 0 0 France Orange France 11 0 0 Germany Total 33 0 1 Germany Telefonica Deutschland Holding 11 0 0 Germany Telekom Deutschland 11 0 0 Germany Vodafone Germany 11 0 1 Greece Total 33 0 0 Greece Cosmote 11 0 0 Greece Vodafone Greece (incl. Hellas Online) 11 0 0 Greece Wind Hellas (incl. Tellas) 11 0 0 Greenland Total 10 0 0 Greenland TELE Greenland 10 0 0 Guernsey Total 32 0 0 Guernsey Guernsey Airtel Limited (Airtel‐Vodafone) 10 0 0 Guernsey JT Guernsey (formerly Wave Telecom) 11 0 0 Sure Guernsey (formerly Guernsey Guernsey Telecom) 11 0 0 Iceland Total 33 0 0 Iceland Nova (Iceland) 11 0 0 Iceland Siminn (Iceland Telecom) 11 0 0 Iceland Vodafone Iceland (Syn) -
Criminal Assault Includes Both a Specific Intent to Commit a Battery, and a Battery That Is Otherwise Unprivileged Committed with Only General Intent
QUESTION 5 Don has owned Don's Market in the central city for twelve years. He has been robbed and burglarized ten times in the past ten months. The police have never arrested anyone. At a neighborhood crime prevention meeting, apolice officer told Don of the state's new "shoot the burglar" law. That law reads: Any citizen may defend his or her place of residence against intrusion by a burglar, or other felon, by the use of deadly force. Don moved a cot and a hot plate into the back of the Market and began sleeping there, with a shotgun at the ready. After several weeks of waiting, one night Don heard noises. When he went to the door, he saw several young men running away. It then dawned on him that, even with the shotgun, he might be in a precarious position. He would likely only get one shot and any burglars would get the next ones. With this in mind, he loaded the shotgun and fastened it to the counter, facing the front door. He attached a string to the trigger so that the gun would fire when the door was opened. Next, thinking that when burglars enter it would be better if they damaged as little as possible, he unlocked the front door. He then went out the back window and down the block to sleep at his girlfriend's, where he had been staying for most of the past year. That same night a police officer, making his rounds, tried the door of the Market, found it open, poked his head in, and was severely wounded by the blast. -
Lesser Included Offenses in Oklahoma Chris Blair [email protected]
University of Tulsa College of Law TU Law Digital Commons Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works 1985 Lesser Included Offenses in Oklahoma Chris Blair [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/fac_pub Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation 38 Okla. L. Rev. 697 (1985). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works by an authorized administrator of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES IN OKLAHOMA CHRISTEN R. BLAIR* Introduction The lesser included offense doctrine in criminal law generally allows the trier of fact to convict a defendant of an offense that is less serious than the offense with which he was charged in the accusatory pleading.' While the doctrine originally developed as an aid to the prosecution when there was insufficient evidence to convict on the charged offense,2 today it is more often used by defendants seeking a conviction for an offense less serious than that actually charged.3 Regardless of who invokes the doctrine in a criminal trial, however, its application has caused considerable confusion among courts and commentators alike.4 Commentators have called it a "Gordian Knot" 5 and a "many-headed hydra." ' 6 The Florida Supreme Court has stated: "The doc- trine [of lesser included offense] is one which has challenged the effective administration of criminal justice for centuries," 7 while the District of Col- umbia Circuit Court of Appeals has said that the doctrine "[is] not without difficulty in any area of the criminal law." 8 The primary cause of this confu- sion is the existence of several different definitions of a lesser included offense, sometimes even within the same jurisdiction.