DOCSLIB.ORG

SRE Survey of Anketell Point Final Report Version 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SRE Survey of Anketell Point Final Report Version 2 Short-range endemic invertebrate baseline survey of Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Prepared for Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd FINAL REPORT - Version 2 07/07/2010 Short-range Endemic Invertebrate Baseline Survey of Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd Short-range Endemic Invertebrate Baseline Survey of Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Final Report – Version 2 Prepared for Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd by Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd Authors: Jarrad Clark, Conor O’Neill Reviewer: Melanie White Date: 7th July 2010 Submitted to: Michelle Carey © 2010 Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd The information contained in this report is solely for the use of the Client for the purpose in which it has been prepared and Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd accepts no responsibility for use beyond this purpose. Any person or organisation wishing to quote or reproduce any section of this report may only do so with the written permission of Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd or Australian Premium Iron Management. Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 1/511 Wanneroo Road BALCATTA WA 6021 P: 08 9345 1608 F: 08 6313 0680 E: [email protected] Project code: 924-AP-API-SRE Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd ii Short-range Endemic Invertebrate Baseline Survey of Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... vi 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of work and survey objectives ............................................................................................... 1 1.3 Survey significance .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Existing environment ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.4.1 Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation of Australia (IBRA) ...................................................... 3 1.4.2 Land Systems ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.4.3 Climate ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4.4 Biological context...................................................................................................................... 5 1.4.5 Land use ................................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Environmental Protection Authority guidance .................................................................................. 5 2 METHODS ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Habitat assessment and site selection ............................................................................................. 7 2.2 Target taxa ....................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Sampling methodology ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Sample handling .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.5 Taxonomy and nomenclature ........................................................................................................... 9 2.6 Survey timing and effort .................................................................................................................10 2.7 Statistical analyses .........................................................................................................................10 2.8 Survey personnel ...........................................................................................................................11 3 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................. 12 3.1 Araneomorphae .............................................................................................................................18 3.1.1 Gallieniellidae .........................................................................................................................18 3.2 Mygalomorphae .............................................................................................................................19 3.2.1 Idiopidae .................................................................................................................................19 3.2.2 Nemesiidae .............................................................................................................................20 3.3 Scorpiones: Buthidae .....................................................................................................................22 3.3.1 Buthidae .................................................................................................................................22 3.4 Pseudoscorpiones ..........................................................................................................................24 3.4.1 Chernetidae ............................................................................................................................24 3.4.2 Chthoniidae ............................................................................................................................24 3.4.3 Garypidae ...............................................................................................................................24 3.4.4 Olpiidae ..................................................................................................................................24 3.5 Myriapoda: Chilopoda ....................................................................................................................27 3.5.1 Scutigeridae ............................................................................................................................27 3.5.2 Cryptopidae ............................................................................................................................27 3.5.3 Scolopendridae .......................................................................................................................27 3.6 Malacostraca: Isopoda: Armadillidae .............................................................................................29 3.6.1 Armadillidae ............................................................................................................................29 3.6.2 Platyarthridae .........................................................................................................................29 3.7 Mollusca .........................................................................................................................................31 3.7.1 Camaenidae ...........................................................................................................................31 3.7.2 Pupillidae ................................................................................................................................31 3.7.3 Succineidae ............................................................................................................................32 3.8 Coleoptera ......................................................................................................................................34 Phoenix Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd iii Short-range Endemic Invertebrate Baseline Survey of Anketell Point Rail Alignment and Port Projects Australian Premium Iron Management Pty Ltd 3.9 Limitations ......................................................................................................................................34 4 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................................ 36 5 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................... 38 APPENDIX 1: ANKETELL POINT RAIL ALIGNMENT AND PORT PROJECTS SRE SITE DESCRIPTIONS . 42 APPENDIX 2: ANKETELL POINT RAIL ALIGNMENT AND PORT PROJECTS SRE SPECIMENS PHOTOGRAPHS ......................................................................................................................... 55 APPENDIX 3: ANKETELL POINT RAIL ALINGMENT AND PORT PROJECTS SRE SITE GPS COORDINATES .......................................................................................................................... 63 APPENDIX 4: BRAY-CURTIS SIMILARITY MATRIX ........................................................................................ 64 APPENDIX 5: ARAENOMORPHAE SPIDER RECORDS ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Five New Species of the Open-Holed Trapdoor Spider Genus Aname
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 35 010–038 (2020) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.35.2020.010-038 Five new species of the open-holed trapdoor spider genus Aname (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Anamidae) from Western Australia, with a revised generic placement for Aname armigera Mark S. Harvey1,2, Karl Gruber2, Mia J. Hillyer1 and Joel A. Huey1,2,3,4 1 Collections and Research, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, Western Australia 6106, Australia. 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia. 3 Adjunct, School of Natural Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia 6027, Australia. 4 Present address: Biologic Environmental Survey, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia. Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The open-holed trapdoor spider genus Aname L. Koch, 1873 is widely distributed throughout Australia, and currently contains 44 named species. Using a combination of morphological and molecular data, we describe fve new species from the Wheatbelt, Mid-west and Goldfelds regions of Western Australia: A. exulans sp. nov., A. lillianae sp. nov., A. mccleeryorum sp. nov., A. phillipae sp. nov. and A. simoneae sp. nov. The female holotype of Aname armigera Rainbow and Pulleine, 1918 from near Mullewa was examined and found to belong to the genus Proshermacha Simon forming the new combination P. armigera (Rainbow and Pulleine, 1918), comb. nov. KEYWORDS: taxonomy, systematics, molecular phylogenetics urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:98828964-6150-465D-B5AE-1480DA0D454E INTRODUCTION Castalanelli, Framenau, Huey and Harvey, 2020, a The open-holed trapdoor spider genus Aname species from Western Australia recently described in L.
    [Show full text]
  • Eg the Short Range-Endemics of the Pilbara Bioregion
    Appendix 3 Supporting Technical Studies Earl Grey Lithium Project SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Prepared for: Covalent Lithium January 2019 Final Report May 2017 Earl Grey SRE & Subterranean Fauna Kidman Resources Ltd Earl Grey Lithium Project SRE and Subterranean Fauna Desktop Assessment Bennelongia Pty Ltd 5 Bishop Street Jolimont WA 6014 P: (08) 9285 8722 F: (08) 9285 8811 E: [email protected] ABN: 55 124 110 167 Report Number: 298 Report Version Prepared by Reviewed by Submitted to Client Method Date Draft Anton Mittra Stuart Halse Email 31 May 2017 Final Stuart Halse Email 24 November 17 Final V2 Anton Mittra Email 14 January 2019 BEC_Mt Holland_SRE_final_V2_10i2019.docx This document has been prepared to the requirements of the Client and is for the use by the Client, its agents, and Bennelongia Environmental Consultants. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property associated with the document belongs to Bennelongia Environmental Consultants and may not be reproduced without written permission of the Client or Bennelongia. No liability or responsibility is accepted in respect of any use by a third party or for purposes other than for which the document was commissioned. Bennelongia has not attempted to verify the accuracy and completeness of information supplied by the Client. © Copyright 2015 Bennelongia Pty Ltd. i Earl Grey SRE & Subterranean Fauna Kidman Resources Ltd EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Covalent Lithium proposes to mine lithium at the Earl Grey deposit (the Proposal) approximately 100 km southeast of Southern Cross in Western Australia. This desktop review examines the likelihood that short-range endemic (SRE) invertebrates and listed terrestrial invertebrate species occur in the Proposal area and whether these species are likely to be impacted by proposed development.
    [Show full text]
  • Raven, RJ 1984. a Revision of the Aname Maculata Species Group
    Raven,R. J. 1984.A revision of the Anamemaculata species group(Araneae, Dipluridae) with notes on biogeography.J. ArachnoL,12:177-193. A REVISION OF THE ANAME MA CULA TA SPECIES GROUP (DIPLURIDAE, ARANEAE) WITH NOTES ON BIOGEOGRAPHY Robert1 J. Raven Queensland Museum Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley, Queensland ABSTRACT Thespecies of the Anamem¢culata (Hogg) species-group (previously Chenistonia) are revised. The type species, Chenistonlamaculara Hogg, and C trevallynia Hickmanare diagnosed.Five new species: A. caeruleomontana,A. earrhwatchorum,A. hiekmani,A. montanaand A. tropica, are described. Asmost of these species possess a serrula, absent in manyother species of Aname,the groupis of phylo~eneticsignificance. Becausethe groupoccurs in discontinuousmontane talnforests fromnorthern Queensland to Tasmania,it is also of biogeographicinterest. INTRODUCTION The Anamemaculata species group includes someof those species previously included in Chenistonia which Raven (1981) considered monophyletic. Although the species have revised lack a synapomorphythey remain a coherent taxonomicunit. Males of all species have a moderately short embolus on the palp and the first metatarsus is not usually as incrassate as that of the A. pallida species group. Twopreviously described species, Anamemaculata (Hogg) and Anametrevallynia (Hickman), are included in the group present. The male of "Chenistonia tepperi’ Hogg[presumably that described by Rainbow and PuUeine(1918) as Chenistonia major Hoggand placed by Main (1972) in Stanwellia] is being revised by Mainas part of the very complex’Chenistonia tepperi’ species group. MATERIALS AND METHODS All drawings were made with a camera-lucida. Spermathecae were drawn after being cleared in lactic acid. All measurementsare in millimetres except eye measurements which are in ocular micrometerunits.
    [Show full text]
  • Zt03383p038.Pdf
    Zootaxa 3383: 15–38 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Molecular and morphological characterisation of new species in the trapdoor spider genus Aname (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Nemesiidae) from the Pilbara bioregion of Western Australia FRANCES S. B. HARVEY1, VOLKER W. FRAMENAU2,3,6, JANINE M. WOJCIESZEK3,7, MICHAEL G. RIX2 & MARK S. HARVEY2,3,4,5 1Shenton College, 227 Stubbs Terrace, Shenton Park, Western Australia 6008, Australia 2Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia 3School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia 4 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 49th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192, USA; and California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, CA 94103-3009, USA 5Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] 6Current address: Phoenix Environmental Sciences, 1/511 Wanneroo Road, Balcatta, Western Australia 6021, Australia 7Current address: School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia Abstract A study of selected species in the nemesiid spider genus Aname L. Koch, 1873 from the Pilbara bioregion of Western Aus- tralia was undertaken using molecular and morphological techniques. Bayesian and parsimony analyses of mitochondrial sequence data from the Cytochrome c Oxidase subunit I (COI) gene found evidence for four species, confirming our initial morphological examination of adult male specimens. These four species are here described as A. mellosa n.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Urodacus from Western Australia, with Additional Descriptive Notes for Urodacus Megamastigus (Scorpiones)
    Records ofthe Western Australian Museum 20: 57-67 (2000). A new species of Urodacus from Western Australia, with additional descriptive notes for Urodacus megamastigus (Scorpiones) Erich S. Volschenkl, Graeme T. Smitht2 and Mark S. HarveyS 1 School of Environmental Biology, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box 1987, Perth Western Australia 6945, Australia 2 CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, LMB4, PO Midland, Western Australia 6056, Australia 3 Department of Terrestrial Invertebrates, Western Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia Abstract - Urodacus mckenziei is described from a large collection of males and a few females from the Shark Bay region of Western Australia. It is superficially similar to U. megamastigus L. E. Koch. Urodacus mckenziei and U. megamast~gus .are.critically examined and a comprehensive description of U. megamastzgus IS gIven to complement Koch's (1977) description. INTRODUCTION (ESV), Museum of Victoria, Melbourne (NMV),' In a major revision of the Australian scorpion Queensland Museum, Brisbane (QM), South fauna, Koch (1977) published a description of an Australian Museum, Adelaide (SAM) and Museum unusual species of Urodacus, U. megamastigus, which National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHP). was easily distinguished from other species of the Terminology and mensuration follows Vachon genus by the unique morphology of the male telson. (1973), Hjelle (1990) and Sissom (1990) which differ The description was based upon five specimens from that used by Koch (1977) in several respects. from two separate localities in Western Australia. Urodacus possess varying degrees of neobothriotaxic Since the description of the species, only six type "c" arrangements, possessing additional or additional specimens have been uncovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Brockman Resources Limited Rail Corridor Short Range Endemic Invertebrate Survey
    OCTOBER 2011 BROCKMAN RESOURCES LIMITED RAIL CORRIDOR SHORT RANGE ENDEMIC INVERTEBRATE SURVEY This page has been left blank intentionally BROCKMAN RESOURCES LIMITED RAIL CORRIDOR SHORT RANGE ENDEMIC INVERTEBRATE SURVEY Brockman Resources Limited Rail Corridor SRE Survey Document Status Approved for Issue Rev Author Reviewer/s Date Name Distributed To Date A N. Dight L. Roque‐Albelo 15/12/10 L.Roque‐Albelo J. Greive 1 N. Dight M. Davis 20/11/11 L. Roque‐Albelo G. Firth 21/10/11 ecologia Environment (2011). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of Brockman Resources Limited and/or ecologia Environment. Restrictions on Use This report has been prepared specifically for Brockman Resources Limited. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to or quoted in any statement, study, report, application, prospectus, loan, or other agreement document, without the express approval of Brockman Resources and/or ecologia Environment. ecologia Environment 1025 Wellington Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 Phone: 08 9322 1944 Fax: 08 9322 1599 Email: [email protected] October 2011 iii Brockman Resources Limited Rail Corridor SRE Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................VIII 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UWA (2005) Mygalomorph Spiders of Mt Gibson Region
    The University of Western Australia School of Animal Biology 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia Australia 6009 Facsimile (08) 9380 1029 Telephone (08) 9380 3903 [email protected] THE MYGALOMORPH SPIDERS FROM THE MT GIBSON REGION, WESTERN AUSTRALIA, INCLUDING SPECIES APPARENTLY ENDEMIC TO THE AREA Report to ATA Environmental October 2005 Barbara York Main 1 REPORT TO ATA ENVIRONMENTAL ON MT GIBSON MYGALOMORPH SPIDERS By Barbara York Main School of Animal Biology MO92, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009. bymain @cyllene.uwa.edu.au OBJECTIVES To identify the mygalomorph spiders (trapdoor spiders) collected by ATA Environmental during a survey of selected invertebrates targeting short range endemic species at the site of the proposed Mt Gibson iron ore mine. INTRODUCTION The trapdoor and funnelweb spiders (Mygalomorphae) are richly represented in Australia with ten families. Of these, eight occur in Western Australia with seven represented in the Wheatbelt. The remaining family, Migidae, is confined to the moist forested and topographically high areas of the southwest of the state. Of those occurring in the wheatbelt, the “brushfooted” Theraphosidae (so-called bird eating spiders) which are generally tropical and secondarily inhabit arid areas (Main 1997), impinge on the northern and eastern margins only. The remaining six families are well represented throughout the wheatbelt and lower pastoral areas. The Idiopidae (typical trapdoor spiders) and the Nemesiidae (mostly open-holed burrowers) are particularly diverse both taxonomically and ecologically and comprise many genera, some of which eg. Aganippe (Idiopidae) and Teyl (Nemesiidae) have undergone sequential radiations in response to geohistorical events combined with climatic change (Main 1996, 1999) resulting in a plethora of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneomorph Spiders from the Southern Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia: a Consideration of Regional Biogeographic Relationships
    DOI: 10.18195/issn.0313-122x.61.2000.295-321 Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement No. 61: 295-321 (2000). Araneomorph spiders from the southern Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia: a consideration of regional biogeographic relationships Mark S. Harveyt, Alison Sampeyl,2, Paul L.J. West1,3 and Julianne M. Waldock1 1 Department of Terrestrial Invertebrates, Western Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia 2Present address: Lot 1984 Weller Rd, Hovea, Western Australia 6071, Australia 3Present address: Halpern Glick & Maunsell Pty Ltd, John Tonkin Centre, 629 Newcastle St, Leederville, Western Australia 6007, Australia Abstract -A survey of the ground-dwelling araneomorph spider assemblages of the Southern Carnarvon Basin revealed a total of 33 families. Apart from the Gnaphosidae and Zodariidae which were not analysed due to time- constraints, we recognized a total of 285 species placed in 146 genera. Very few taxa could be assigned to existing genera or species, reflecting poor taxonomic knowledge of many groups of spiders. Patterns in species composition across the study area were correlated with rainfall gradients, and a discrete claypan fauna was detected. Vicariance events seem to explain part of the patterning evident. However, strongly localised patterns in species composition were also evident. INTRODUCTION Hartmeyer, 1907-1908). Modern authors had Araneomorph spiders constitute a large contributed only a further nine species (Baehr and proportion of total arachnid diversity, with 90 Baehr, 1987, 1992, 1993; Harvey, 1995; Hirst, 1991; recognized families and an estimated 35 000 Jocque and Baehr, 1992; Levi, 1983; Main, 1987; described species (Coddington and Levi, 1991; McKay, 1975, 1979), although numerous additional Platnick, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Description and Biogeographic Implications of a New Species of The
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 27 176–181 (2012) Description and biogeographic implications of a new species of the Chenistonia maculata group from south-western Western Australia and rediagnosis of Chenistonia (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Nemesiidae) Barbara York Main School of Animal Biology MO92, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The new species Chenistonia boranup is described from south-western Western Australia. This is the fi rst record of the C. maculata species group from the western part of the continent. Chenistonia Hogg is rediagnosed and comments given on other species attributed here to the genus. KEYWORDS: taxonomy, morphology, karri forest, Gondwanan relics INTRODUCTION Australia is described and its biogeographic status The nemesiid spider genus Chenistonia Hogg, 1901 indicated. For comparison, fi gures of the male of the was synonymised with Aname Koch, 1873 by Raven type species are presented. The taxonomic position of (1981) but regarded as a valid genus by Main (1982a, Chenistonia trevallynia is also discussed. 1985a,b, 1986, 1994) and elsewhere in ecological papers (Curry et al., 1985; Main, 1982b, 1987a,b, 1991, 1993a,b, 1996a,b, 1997; Main et al., 2000). Raven (1984, 1985) MATERIAL AND METHODS continued to consider Chenistonia as synonymous with The material examined for this study is stored in 75% Aname until acknowledging it later as a valid genus for ethanol and lodged in the Museum of Natural History, which he gave a revised diagnosis (Raven, 2000). In London (BMNH) and the Western Australian Museum, the meantime, he recognised a group of species, some Perth (WAM).
    [Show full text]
  • ARACHNID AND... Download 537.3
    6. ARACHNID AND MYRIAPOD FAUNA Mark S. Harvey* and Julianne M. Waldock* 6.1 Introduction The invertebrate fauna of Australia is one ofthe most poorly studied in the world, with vast numbers of undescribed species. Virtually any collection will contain at least one new species, especially from remote regions such as the semi-arid deserts. Irregular collections of invertebrates from the Pilbara haye made their way into museum collections. Some ofthis material has formed part oftaxonomic revisions, thus allowing scientific names to be applied to some ofthe elements of the fauna. However, detailed collections spanning several seasons have not previously been made from the region. The data presented here provide a base-line list of the taxa collected (excluding insects, crustaceans and molluscs) from the Abydos-Woodstock Reserve, along with notes on taxa of importance. 6.2 Study Area and Methods The sites are documented in Appendix I and the history, vegetation and physiography of the Reserve outlined in Chapters 1-4 (this volume). Specimens were collected by a variety ofmethods. Pitfall trappingfor vertebrates was conducted at many sites, and many larger invertebrates were also obtained from these pitlines (see Chapter 5, this volume). Supplementary pitfall traps filled with preservative were used on several surveys to assess the smaller invertebrates. Night collecting with the aid of head-torches allowed further sampling of the nocturnal invertebrates. All specimens were preserved in 75% ethanol and are lodged in the Western Australian Museum. 6.3 Arachnids Approximately 130 species in 5 orders (Scorpionida, Araneae, Pseudoscopionida, Opilionida, Acarida) were collected (Table 6.1). Scorpionida Two species of Lychas (Buthidae), Urodacus armatus Pocock and Urodacus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns in the Composition of Ground-Dwelling Araneomorph Spider Communities in the Western Australian Wheatbelt
    DOI: 10.18195/issn.0313-122x.67.2004.257-291 Patterns in the composition of ground-dwelling araneomorph spider communities in the Western Australian wheatbelt 2 2 M. S. Harvei, J. M. Waldock', N. A. Guthrie , B. J. Durranf and N. L. McKenzie Departl1H'nt of Terrestrial Invertebrates, Western ;\ustralian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Western i\ustralia 6000, Australia T)epartl11L'nt of Conservation and Land Man,lgement, 1'0 Box 51 Wanneroo, Western Australia 6065, Australia Abstract ~ Ground-dwelling Maneomorph spiders were sampled at 304 l]uadrats chosen to represent the geographical extent and diversity of uncleMed terrestrial l'lwironments in a 205000 km' Mea known as the Western Australian wlH'atbelt. A total of 744 species comprising 39 families were recorded, of which the families Salticidae (121 species), Zodariidae (117), Theridiidae (RO), Lycosidae (61), Oonopidae (46) and Lamponidae (41) exhibited a marked species-level radiation. For analysis, families with a high proportion of arboreal species, and l]uadrats that were often flooded or overtlv affected by secondarv s,llinitv, were excluded. Thus, a total of 622 specie's from 240 l]uadrats were analysed, with an average of 21.9 (s.d. species pCI' l]uadrat. Most of the variation obserVl'd in the patterns of species composition could be explained in terms of summer temperature, precipitation seasonality, soil salinity and pH attributes. Assemblage species richness was constrained bv soil salinity, except for the Lycosidae which showed a positive relationship. INTRODUCTION Very few araneomorph spider families are South-western Australia represents a region that currently well known in southern Western is internationally recognized for its exceptional Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • A6 11 WR Two Phase Fauna Survey (Biota 2011) Part 2.Pdf
    Western Range Two-Phase Fauna Survey 5.7 Short Range Endemic Invertebrates Based on morphological identifications, six potential SRE invertebrate species were recorded from the study area during the survey. These included one mygalomorph spider species, one selenopid spider species, two pseudoscorpion species, one millipede species and one pulmonate snail species (Figure 5.1). 5.7.1 Mygalomorph Spiders Mygalomorph spiders are regularly collected in the Pilbara bioregion (source: Biota Internal Database). However, much of the taxonomy has only been resolved to the level of genus. This group is known to support a number of taxa with very limited distributions, and several species are included in Schedule 1 of the Wildlife Conservation (Specially Protected Fauna) Notice 2010 (although none of these occur in the Pilbara bioregion). A single morphospecies of mygalomorph spider was recorded on eight occasions during the survey: Aname sp. (family Nemesiidae; Plate 5.18). All specimens were collected during dedicated SRE searches via the excavation of burrows. Although not necessarily indicative of distribution, the Aname sp. was recorded on clay or loamy clay habitat within the Newman, Boolgeeda and Marandoo Land Systems, which are widespread throughout the Pilbara Bioregion (Figure 5.1). Table 5.7: Mygalomorph spiders recorded within the Western Range study area. Taxa Site Easting Northing Number Aname sp. Opportunistic 554534 7432219 1 Aname sp. Opportunistic 550073 7437362 1 Aname sp. Opportunistic 550088 7437330 1 Aname sp. Opportunistic 550092 7437344 1 Aname sp. Opportunistic 550154 7437346 1 Aname sp. Opportunistic 547137 7435299 1 Aname sp. WSR07 548294 7437818 1 Aname sp. WSR07 548294 7437818 1 Plate 5.18: Aname sp.
    [Show full text]