DOCSLIB.ORG

Effects of Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism on Donation Intentions: the Moderating Role of Donation Information Openness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Effects of Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism on Donation Intentions: the Moderating Role of Donation Information Openness sustainability Article Effects of Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism on Donation Intentions: The Moderating Role of Donation Information Openness Hyeyeon Yuk 1, Tony C. Garrett 1,* and Euejung Hwang 2 1 School of Business, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Marketing, Otago Business School, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-3290-2833 Abstract: This study investigated the relationship between two subtypes of narcissism (grandiose vs. vulnerable) and donation intentions, while considering the moderating effects of donation information openness. The results of an experimental survey of 359 undergraduate students showed that individuals who scored high on grandiose narcissism showed greater donation intentions when the donor’s behavior was public, while they showed lower donation intentions when it was not. In addition, individuals who scored high on vulnerable narcissism showed lower donation intentions when the donor’s behavior was not public. This study contributes to narcissism and the donation behavior literature and proposes theoretical and practical implications as per narcissistic individual differences. Future research possibilities are also discussed. Keywords: narcissism; grandiose narcissism; vulnerable narcissism; donation intentions; donation Citation: Yuk, H.; Garrett, T.C.; information openness Hwang, E. Effects of Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism on Donation Intentions: The Moderating Role of Donation Information Openness. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7280. 1. Introduction https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137280 Nowadays, it is not only a firm’s social responsibility but also an individual’s proso- cial behavior that is crucial to the sustainable development of society [1]. Furthermore, Academic Editor: María del C. understanding individual differences such as a narcissistic personality is important to Pérez-Fuentes contribute to both firms’ and nonprofit organizations’ sustainability. This is because, when a firm’s cause-related marketing (CRM) or a nonprofit organization’s fundraising campaign Received: 9 May 2021 is based on individual differences, more effective marketing for charitable giving can be Accepted: 25 June 2021 implemented, after which we can expect more donations from individuals, which would Published: 29 June 2021 help to better our world and society at large. Scholars have investigated individual characteristics, such as personality, religion, Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral gender cognitive ability [2], and regulatory focus [3], in relation to charitable giving. In with regard to jurisdictional claims in this research, the authors examined the relationship between one individual personality published maps and institutional affil- characteristic—narcissism—and donation behavior. iations. Although the importance of narcissism in prosocial behavior has been examined in previous research [4–6], there has been little focus on the relationship between the two narcissism subtypes and donation intentions. Narcissism is defined as the presence of a self-centered orientation, positive feelings Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. of being special and entitled [7], and the relative lack of communal traits and psychological Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. awareness [8], thus leading to aggression and hostility when the self-ego is infringed This article is an open access article upon [9]. It is often assumed that narcissism is associated with antisocial behavior because distributed under the terms and of traits of low empathy and low morality [8]. However, prosocial behavior may be conditions of the Creative Commons exhibited for various reasons, such as altruism or opportunism, when rewards, such as Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// praise from others, are available [10,11]. Indeed, previous research has suggested that creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ individual characteristics, such as narcissism, may influence prosocial behavior [12,13]. 4.0/). Sustainability 2021, 13, 7280. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137280 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Sustainability 2021, 13, 7280 2 of 11 There are two generally accepted distinct subtypes of narcissism—grandiose and vulnerable. Although these two types have commonalities (e.g., self-centeredness and low empathy) [7,14], there are differences between the two. Those individuals with grandiose narcissism tend to have high self-esteem, self-assurance, exploitativeness, extraversion, a strong need for admiration, and low neuroticism [7]. Conversely, those with vulnerable narcissism tend to have relatively low self-esteem, high social avoidance, introversion, and high neuroticism [7,15–17]. Grandiose narcissists are less likely to be influenced by social pressure than vulnerable narcissists are [5]. The potential social influences on donation intention by narcissism type have not been examined in detail. This paper investigates these relationships. 1.1. Literature Review and Hypotheses 1.1.1. Narcissism and Prosocial Behaviors Past research results on narcissism and prosocial behavior are inconsistent, with positive relationships [18,19], negative relationships [6,13,20,21], or no significant relation- ships [22] being found. However, to the best of our knowledge, these previous studies were based on grandiose-type narcissism without considering another subtype of narcissism, such as vulnerable narcissism, although there is a potential possibility that both dimensions of narcissism are relatively orthogonal [23]. Thus, we need to consider both grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, as they may differ according to the conditions under which they lead to more helping nature. Most previous research has not examined the differences in the relationship between specific subtypes of narcissism and prosocial behavior, with a few exceptions. To be spe- cific, previous research suggests that grandiose narcissism has a positive relationship with adolescents’ prosocial behavior, while vulnerable narcissism has no significant relationship with it [4]. In addition, trait narcissism (similar to grandiose narcissism) has a positive relationship with helping, while narcissistic rivalry has a negative relationship with help- ing [24]. Additionally, agentic narcissism (similar to grandiose narcissists) has a negative relationship with both subjective and objective prosocial behavior [6]. Therefore, there is an inconsistent relationship between grandiose narcissism and helping behavior; however, each study has used different approaches to measure the helping behavior. In addition, there is no significant relationship between vulnerable narcissism and helping behavior in the preceding literature. Furthermore, previous studies examined potential moderating factors for the relation- ship between narcissism and prosocial behaviors. To be specific, donors who have high scores in narcissism exhibit greater donation intentions when appealed to via imagine-self charitable appeals, as imagine-self appeals enable donors who have high narcissism to project themselves into the recipient’s situation and lead to greater empathy and char- ity [12]. Another research has shown that grandiose narcissism has a positive relationship with less helping under high social pressure, while vulnerable narcissism has a positive relationship with less helping under low social pressure [5]. Although these studies have shown several moderating factors, there is little research to examine the moderating effects of donation information openness as a moderating factor. Based on the self-regulatory model of narcissism [25], more narcissistic people are more likely to behave pro-socially when the situation has the potential to improve their self-image due to admiration from others [4]. Accordingly, donation information openness (i.e., whether one’s prosocial be- havior information is public or not) will be a potential factor to influence motivation to donate more to individuals who have high scores in narcissism. In addition, the increased level of appraisal, depending on the donation information openness, will lead to enhanced narcissistic self-esteem [10,19]. Therefore, we believe that examining the moderating effects of donation information openness is important for narcissism and prosocial nature research. Furthermore, as each narcissism type has distinct features of personality (e.g., extraversion for grandiose vs. intro- version for vulnerable), considering different subtypes of narcissism on donation behavior Sustainability 2021, 13, 7280 3 of 11 is necessary. Thus, to fill these gaps, this study investigated the moderating effects of dona- tion information openness between two subtypes of narcissism and donation intentions. 1.1.2. Moderating Role of Donation Information Openness for Grandiose Narcissism in Prosocial Behavior Donation information openness refers to whether information about one’s dona- tion behavior is publicly available or not. Based on this definition, our hypotheses were developed. For grandiose narcissists, when they are aware that their donation behavior is more public, they will have greater donation intentions because they tend to help others to improve their self-enhancement appraisal [6,10]. To be specific, when the grandiose nar- cissists are aware that their prosocial behavior is more open to others, they will be more likely to take the opportunity to demonstrate their charitable behavior to receive greater personal attention and appraisal [10,19]. Therefore,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How to Tell If You Are a Victim of Bullying at the Workplace
    https://www.businessdailyafrica.com/lifestyle/pfinance/-victim-bullying-workplace/4258410-3842046- kls3ly/index.html How to tell if you are a victim of bullying at the workplace Wednesday, March 8, 2017 16:48 An illustration of an office bully . PHOTO | PHOEBE OKALL | NMG The recently reported episodes of secondary school bullying, torture and hazing shocked the nation in the past week. In its wake, Kenya ponders what sick institutional cultures must exist in order to promulgate regularised repeated physical violence by and against students in varying high schools. Many might not realise that the depravity of bullying exists beyond schools and sports fields. Duncan Chappell and Vittorio Di Martino of the International Labor Office highlight deviant behaviour at workplaces as one of the most pertinent emerging issues in organisations across the globe. Executives and social scientists alike maintain many terms to describe deviant counterproductive behaviour in work settings including delinquency, deviance, retaliation, revenge, violence, emotional abuse, mobbing, bullying, misconduct, and organisational aggression. Social scientists Eleanna Galanaki and Nancy Papalexandris define workplace bullying as recurring persistent negative acts directed to one or more persons that create a negative work environment. In bullying, the targeted person experiences difficulty in defending and protecting themselves. Therefore, bullying does not refer to conflicts between two parties of equal strength but rather a more influential aggressor in an imbalance of power. Managers might not understand the severe depths and prevalence of workplace bullying. Workers in some industries report versions of bullying at rates of 70 per cent. Researchers Ståle Einarsen and Anders Skogstad detail that male-dominated industries valuing machismo and masculinity or efficiency at any and all costs increases workplace tensions and provides greater tolerance for aggressive behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulnerable Narcissism Is (Mostly) a Disorder of Neuroticism
    Journal of Personality 86:2, April 2018 VC 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Vulnerable Narcissism Is (Mostly) a DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12303 Disorder of Neuroticism Joshua D. Miller,1 Donald R. Lynam,2 Colin Vize,2 Michael Crowe,1 Chelsea Sleep,1 Jessica L. Maples-Keller,1 Lauren R. Few,1 and W. Keith Campbell1 1University of Georgia 2Purdue University Abstract Objective: Increasing attention has been paid to the distinction between the dimensions of narcissistic grandiosity and vulnerability. We examine the degree to which basic traits underlie vulnerable narcissism, with a particular emphasis on the importance of Neuroticism and Agreeableness. Method: Across four samples (undergraduate, online community, clinical-community), we conduct dominance analyses to partition the variance predicted in vulnerable narcissism by the Five-Factor Model personality domains, as well as compare the empirical profiles generated by vulnerable narcissism and Neuroticism. Results: These analyses demonstrate that the lion’s share of variance is explained by Neuroticism (65%) and Agreeableness (19%). Similarity analyses were also conducted in which the extent to which vulnerable narcissism and Neuroticism share similar empirical networks was tested using an array of criteria, including self-, informant, and thin slice ratings of personality; interview-based ratings of personality disorder and pathological traits; and self-ratings of adverse events and functional out- comes. The empirical correlates of vulnerable narcissism and Neuroticism were nearly identical (MrICC 5 .94). Partial analyses demonstrated that the variance in vulnerable narcissism not shared with Neuroticism is largely specific to disagreeableness- related traits such as distrustfulness and grandiosity. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the parsimony of using basic personality to study personality pathology and have implications for how vulnerable narcissism might be approached clinically.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association Between Vulnerable/Grandiose Narcissism and Emotion Regulation
    fpsyg-11-519330 October 9, 2020 Time: 14:52 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 15 October 2020 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.519330 The Association Between Vulnerable/Grandiose Narcissism and Emotion Regulation Leonie A. K. Loeffler1*, Anna K. Huebben1, Sina Radke1,2, Ute Habel1,2,3 and Birgit Derntl4,5,6* 1 Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, 2 JARA-Institute Brain Structure Function Relationship, Research Center Jülich, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, 3 Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine 10, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany, 4 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical School, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 5 Werner Reichardt Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 6 LEAD Graduate School and Research Network, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany Narcissism has been widely discussed in the context of career success and leadership. Besides several adaptive traits, narcissism has been characterized by difficulties in emotion regulation. However, despite its essential role in mental health, there is little research on emotion regulation processes in narcissism. Specifically, the investigation Edited by: Jiajin Yuan, of not only the habitual use of specific regulation strategies but also the actual ability Southwest University, China to regulate is needed due to diverging implications for treatment approaches. Thereby Reviewed by: it is important to differentiate between vulnerable and grandiose narcissism as these Stefan Sütterlin, Østfold University College, Norway two phenotypes might be related differently to regulation deficits. The aim of this study Radosław Rogoza, was to examine the association between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism and Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski´ University, emotion regulation in healthy individuals (30f/30m) focusing on the strategy reappraisal.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationships Between the Dark Triad Personality Traits and Affective Experience During the Day: a Day Reconstruction Study
    RESEARCH ARTICLE As cold as a fish? Relationships between the Dark Triad personality traits and affective experience during the day: A day reconstruction study Irena PilchID* Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract a1111111111 The Dark Triad of personality is a cluster of three socially aversive personality traits: Machia- a1111111111 a1111111111 vellianism, narcissism and psychopathy. These traits are associated with a selfish, aggres- sive and exploitative interpersonal strategy. The objective of the current study was to establish relationships between the Dark Triad traits (and their dimensions) and momentary affect. Machiavellianism, grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism and the dimensions of the Triarchic model of psychopathy (namely, boldness, meanness and disinhibition) were OPEN ACCESS examined. We used the Day Reconstruction Method, which is based on reconstructing Citation: Pilch I (2020) As cold as a fish? affective states experienced during the previous day. The final sample consisted of 270 uni- Relationships between the Dark Triad personality traits and affective experience during the day: A day versity students providing affective ratings of 3047 diary episodes. Analyses using multilevel reconstruction study. PLoS ONE 15(2): e0229625. modelling showed that only boldness had a positive association with positive affective states https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229625 and affect balance, and a negative association with negative affective states. Grandiose Editor: Peter Karl Jonason, Univeristy of Padova, narcissism and its sub-dimensions had no relationship with momentary affect. The other ITALY dark traits were related to negative momentary affect and/or inversely related to positive Received: November 6, 2019 momentary affect and affect balance.
    [Show full text]
  • Shedding Light on Psychology's Dark Triad | Psychology Today
    Find a Therapist Topics Get Help Magazine Tests Experts Click Here f or FullPrescribing Inf ormation Prescription Toujeo® is a long-acting insulin used US.GLT.15.10.114© 2002- to control blood sugar in adults with diabetes 2015sanof i-av entis U.S. mellitus. LLC.All rights reserv ed. Toujeo® contains 3 times as much insulin Susan Krauss Whitbourne Ph.D. Fulfillment at Any Age Shedding Light on Psychology’s Dark Triad A dirty dozen test to detect narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Like 567 psychopathy Posted Jan 26, 2013 Most Popular SHARE TWEET EMAIL MORE All Work and No Play 1 Make the Baining the Lurking beneath the surface of people who use others to their own advantage is psychology’s "Dullest Culture" “Dark Triad.” Defined as a set of traits that include the tendency to seek admiration and 5 Sex/Relationship Myths special treatment (otherwise known as narcissism), to be callous and insensitive 2 Therapists Should Stop (psychopathy) and to manipulate others (Machiavellianism), the Dark Triad is rapidly Believing becoming a new focus of personality psychology. The Two Things That 3 Make a Breakup open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com 3 Make a Breakup Researchers are finding that the Dark Triad underlies a host of undesirable behaviors Devastating including aggressiveness, sexual opportunism, and impulsivity. Until recently, the only way to capture the Dark Triad in the lab was to administer lengthy tests measuring each personality The Trouble With Bright 4 Girls trait separately. With the development of the “Dirty Dozen” scale, however, psychologists Peter Jonason and Gregory Webster (2010) are now making it possible to spot these Are You With the Right potentially troublesome traits with a simple 12-item rating scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluctuations in Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissistic States: a Momentary Perspective
    1 Fluctuations in grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic states: A momentary perspective Elizabeth A. Edershile Aidan G.C. Wright University of Pittsburgh This manuscript reflects a portion of the first author’s Master’s thesis. Aidan Wright’s effort on this project was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (L30 MH101760). Participant recruitment was supported by the University of Pittsburgh’s Clinical and Translational Science Institute, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program (UL1 TR001857). The CTSA program is led by the NIH's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). The opinions expressed are solely those of the authors and not those of the funding source. This manuscript and supporting data and analyses has been posted on Open Science Framework and can be accessed at https://osf.io/c9uea/ Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Elizabeth Edershile, Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 3137 Sennott Square, 210 S. Bouquet St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15260. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Abstract Theories of narcissism emphasize the dynamic processes within and between grandiosity and vulnerability. Research seeking to address this has either not studied grandiosity and vulnerability together or has used dispositional measures to assess what are considered to be momentary states. Emerging models of narcissism suggest grandiosity and vulnerability can further be differentiated into a three-factor structure – Exhibitionistic Grandiosity, Entitlement, and Vulnerability. Research in other areas of maladaptive personality (e.g., borderline personality disorder) has made headway in engaging data collection and analytic methods that are specifically meant to examine such questions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between the Types of Narcissism and Psychological Well-Being: the Roles of Emotions and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TYPES OF NARCISSISM AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING: THE ROLES OF EMOTIONS AND DIFFICULTIES IN EMOTION REGULATION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY İREM AKINCI IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY AUGUST 2015 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Tülin Gençöz Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Tülin Gençöz Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr.Bengi ÖNER-ÖZKAN (METU, PSY) Prof. Dr. Tülin GENÇÖZ (METU, PSY) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Banu YILMAZ (AU., PSY) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name: İrem AKINCI Signature : iii ABSTRACT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TYPES OF NARCISSISM AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING: THE ROLES OF EMOTIONS AND DIFFICULTIES IN EMOTION REGULATION Akıncı, İrem M.S., Department of Psychology Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Tülin Gençöz August 2015, 149 pages The aims of this study were (1) to examine the possible effects of age and gender on the subtypes of narcissism, emotions, emotion regulation difficulties, and psychological well-being; (2) to examine the variables associated with emotions, emotion regulation difficulties, and psychological well-being; and (3) to investigate the mediating role of emotions and emotion regulation difficulties between the subtypes of narcissism and psychological well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Appraisal of the Dark Triad 1 Running Head
    A critical appraisal of the Dark Triad 1 Running Head: A critical appraisal of the Dark Triad A critical appraisal of the Dark Triad literature and suggestions for moving forward Joshua D. Miller University of Georgia Colin Vize Purdue University Michael L. Crowe University of Georgia Donald R. Lynam Purdue University In press: Current Directions in Psychological Science Correspondence: Josh Miller, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602. [email protected] A critical appraisal of the Dark Triad 2 Abstract Since its introduction in 2002, Dark Triad (DT) research– the simultaneous study of psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism – has exploded, with the publication of hundreds of peer reviewed articles, books and chapters, as well as coverage by the lay media. Unfortunately, there are several limitations to this research that are unrecognized or ignored. These limitations include 1) the treatment of DT constructs as unidimensional contrary to evidence for their multidimensionality, 2) the indistinctness between current measures of Machiavellianism and psychopathy, 3) the use of multivariate statistical approaches that pose statistical and interpretive difficulties, 4) failure to test DT relations directly against one another, and 5) methodological limitations related to convenience sampling and reliance on mono-method approaches. We discuss these problems in detail and describe solutions that can result in a more robust, replicable, and meaningful literature moving forward. Keywords: psychopathy, narcissism, Machiavellianism, partialing, multidimensionality A critical appraisal of the Dark Triad 3 In 2002, Paulhus and Williams published a seminal study on the “Dark Triad” (DT), the simultaneous study of psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism with the goal of examining the ways in which these personality constructs overlap and diverge.
    [Show full text]
  • Grandiose Narcissism Versus Vulnerable Narcissism in Threatening Situations: Emotional Reactions to Achievement Failure and Interpersonal Rejection
    Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 8, 2010, pp. 874-902 NARCISSISM IN THREATENING SITUATIONS BESSER AND PRIEL GRANDIOSE NaRCISSISM VERSUS VULNERABLE NaRCISSISM IN THREATENING SITUATIONS: EMOTIONAL REACTIONS TO ACHIEVEMENT FAILURE AND INTERPERSONAL REJECTION AvI BESSER Sapir College, Israel BEATRIZ PRIEL Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel This study compared grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism in terms of emotional reactions to threats involving achievement failure and interpersonal rejection. It was hypothesized that grandiose narcissism is associated with vulner- ability to achievement setbacks. In contrast, vulnerable narcissism involves sensi- tivity to shaming interpersonal experiences. A randomized experimental 2-wave design was used with a community sample of 448 participants. Each participant was asked to imagine 1 of 4 randomly assigned hypothetical scenarios intended to evoke the threat of high- (n = 117) or low- (n = 105) level interpersonal rejec- tion; or high- (n = 108) or low- (n = 118) level achievement failure. According to this study’s findings, in the high achievement-threat group, but not in the high interpersonal-threat group, grandiose narcissism significantly predicted greater change in negative outcomes. In contrast, in the face of a high-level interpersonal threat, but not a high-level achievement-threat, high levels of vulnerable nar- cissism were significantly associated with greater change in negative outcomes. These findings illustrate how different types of threatening situations vary in their relevance to grandiose narcissism as compared to vulnerable narcissism. Grateful thanks are extended to all of the participants in this study. We would like to acknowledge all of the blind judges and research assistants from Sapir Academic College and Ben-Gurion University of the Negev for their invaluable assistance with the data collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Coping Strategies Amongst Individuals with Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissistic Traits
    Author’s Accepted Manuscript provided by Kingston University Research Repository View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk CORE brought to you by Different Coping Strategies Amongst Individuals with Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissistic Traits Bruce A. fernie, Agoston Fung, Ana V. Nikčević www.elsevier.com/locate/jad PII: S0165-0327(16)30671-1 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.009 Reference: JAD8425 To appear in: Journal of Affective Disorders Received date: 23 April 2016 Revised date: 11 August 2016 Accepted date: 14 August 2016 Cite this article as: Bruce A. fernie, Agoston Fung and Ana V. Nikčević, Different Coping Strategies Amongst Individuals with Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissistic Traits, Journal of Affective Disorders, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.009 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 Different Coping Strategies Amongst Individuals with Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissistic Traits Bruce A. Ferniea,b*, Agoston Fungc, Ana V. Nikčevićc aKing’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, London, UK bHIV Liaison Service, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK cFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Kingston University, London, UK *Corresponding author at: Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, Henry Wellcome Building, De Crespigny Park, SE5 8AF.
    [Show full text]
  • Male and Female Face of Machiavellianism: Opportunism Or Anxiety?
    Personality and Individual Differences 117 (2017) 221–229 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Personality and Individual Differences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/paid Male and female face of Machiavellianism: Opportunism or anxiety? Andrea Czibor a,⁎, Zsolt Peter Szabo b,DanielN.Jonesc, Andras Norbert Zsido a,TundePaala, Linda Szijjarto a, Jessica R. Carre c,TamasBereczkeia a University of Pecs, Hungary b Eotvos Lorand University, Hungary c The University of Texas at El Paso, United States article info abstract Article history: The relationship between Machiavellianism and emotion management features is highly debated. In our study Received 6 March 2017 we try to clarify the controversial findings by highlighting the role of gender differences. Three studies with dif- Received in revised form 31 May 2017 ferent (undergraduate and employed) participants were conducted to investigate gender differences in Machia- Accepted 1 June 2017 vellianism-related personality characteristics. We used different measures of Machiavellianism and explored their connection with temperament and character traits (Study 1), with scales of six-factor (HEXACO) model of personality (Study 2), and with different types of psychopathy and narcissism (Study 3). Our results show Keywords: Machiavellianism that there are gender differences in the connection of Machiavellianism and other personality traits, and that Gender most of the differences were found in the field of emotion management. We found that women's Machiavellian- Opportunism ism scores were correlated with harm avoidant, anxious, vulnerable, hypersensitive features, while Machiavel- Anxiety lianism among men was associated with risk taking, self-confidence, and an opportunistic worldview. Dark Triad © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. HEXACO TCI 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Empathy the Afghanistan Intervention Shows Why the U.S
    New America Foundation Strategic Empathy The Afghanistan intervention shows why the U.S. must empathize with its adversaries. Matt Waldman, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University April 2014 As the United States withdraws from Afghanistan, it leaves mistakes were made. To name but a few, the U.S. backed violence and uncertainty in its wake. The election of a new power-holders widely seen by Afghans as abusive and Afghan president gives some grounds for optimism and unjust, which undermined the Afghan government’s could improve the fraught relationship between legitimacy and generated powerful grievances; coalition Afghanistan and the U.S. But no Afghan election since the forces caused too many civilian casualties; aid was often 2001 intervention has brought about a diminution in wasteful or ineffective, and swung from being insufficient, violence – and the conflict shows no signs of abating. The in the early 2000s, to excessive, thereby fueling corruption; Taliban is powerful, tenacious and increasingly deadly. and there was no effective U.S. political strategy for Civilian casualties are rising and the fighting forces some Afghanistan or the region.* 10,000 Afghans from their homes every month.1 The linchpin of the U.S. exit strategy, Afghan national security But the most egregious error of the United States was to forces, have critical capability gaps and are suffering huge pursue a strategy founded on a misreading of its enemy. As losses of up to 400 a month due to escalating insurgent former Defense Secretary Robert Gates acknowledges, the attacks.2 The Afghan government is corrupt and anemic, United States was “profoundly ignorant about our reconstruction is faltering and the region continues to be adversaries and about the situation on the ground….
    [Show full text]