South Lake Champlain Basin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

South Lake Champlain Basin P Huntington ok Boqu East la ro anch et Ri tte B Br ver Charlotte R le h k i a rt o v H o o e N r r, B L l a il Charlotte M e c Prindle 86 u r Corners Derby Br p 86 ook S Lake Cedar South 9N Beach Placid Hinesburg Ho Huntington llow k B Center rook o rook ll B o Mi Big Pond r e B c l ru l p a S b m Southern Lake Champlain Basin i K B 9 Dowsville u r p e Land Use - Land Cover e Coleman B JOHN BROWN r 22 Corner o Cedar Monkton P o h North 116 FARM STATE k Ridge B el Lake a p k HISTORIC SITE s Ferrisburgh r o t B 9N o o n r r o Ecole Hanksville B B J o LITTLE Rockville ac r k North kson o 87 d Champlain B o e OTTER Monkton Fayston Vermont Agency of Natural Resources r k k Vermont Agency of Natural Resources F o a o o l k CREEK WMA Boro P ls o B r o STARKSBORO r C o KINGSLAND BAY n o MONKTON d k er 73 PAULINE L MURDOCK iv 87 STATE PARK B R r Starksboro SAL - Lake Champlain Basin (2001) WILDLIFE SANCTUARY k o Department of Environmental Conservation o Department of Environmental Conservation c (NEW YORK STATE) la k Branc B he h LOWER OTTER T Urban he 9 CREEK WMA h, T 9N East KEENE nc ra 9N Barnumtown Monkton Agricultural B Otter Creek Ferrisburgh The accuracy of the data layers shown on this map are limited by the accuracy of the source materials. Although every effort has been made to assure the accuracy k Rock 17 oo L of features and their attributes, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources is not responsible for errors in or misuse of the data. The information used in preparing Br Landing ewi Brush Brook er s C Slide ern Ho re the data layer represents the best data possessed by the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources at the time of production. No warranty as to the accuracy or the K isin ek gt usefulness of the data is expressed or implied. on B Port Henry BUTTON BAY Forest Waitsfield ro o k STATE PARK Water 100 r Lake 22A Irasville Roaring Brook ve Ri ck Champlain la Winona W17etland B Cartographer: Ryan Knox, 22nd of January WESTPORT Vergennes Lake Jerusalem Nichols FERRISBURG South ELIZABETHTOWN Pond VERGENNES Starksboro Barren 73 Ste k ven roo s B 9 y B ro ac ok t 7 S ok S Panton l Cold Bro i d C o e u L Sugarbush B g Lincoln h it r l tl Village o in Pond e 116 o B O Lake Champlain - k ro 87 tt o M e k r Bristol Rocky Downingville u Cr d ee Dale B WALTHAM New k N Mulle PANTON C New Haven ort n B e h r F r a Haven Richelieu River Watershed o e or 87 o v Junction k e k e 22A 17 West 100 B Mill k oq r B Lincoln ue Pond t r BRISTOL n R o cea iv o O e k East ic r ant Warren tl Warren o A Bartlett NEW Lincoln r t 9 Pond Goodrich e er Corner iv iv HAVEN R R New Haven e et c u ook 9N Mills n q Br Addison e o B y 17 r B a ne West rk r n w o tl e a e K Addison L F tt th B t u r o o in S o 17 a k South S Lincoln Alpine CANADA Weybridge Village DAR STATE Brooksville PARK 116 ll Bro Mi ok ADDISON Port MORIAH Ston Beldens y B Henry r CHIMNEY M o o POINT c k rook K STATE PARK W ADDISON ill B e a 22A WEYBRIDGE M n Port Henry rd z s i Chimney Point C Weybridge e re COUNTY B e r WHITNEY/HOSPITAL k Hill VT oo k South CREEK WMA Lake A Willow Point Tub Mill CROWN Pond Middlebury rook POINT STATE BRIDPORT ve B HISTORIC SITE ro Palmer G NORTH ok Corner ro B 910L l l HUDSON i Lake k M MIDDLEBURY o Champlain NY 87 o 125 r 9 B 100 n 22A 125 w o t Birdport Granville b B u 30 87 r NH C a is te d B Piper 125 Ripton ro Lower o Crossing k East Granville Farmingdale Middlebury 125 P h West Cornwall e PUTTS CREEK l eek Bridport Land Use - Land Cover p Cr STATE WILDLIFE CROWN s am Bread B tn MANAGEMENT AREA Urban r u Loaf o P Wetland POINT o k 2% 7% Water Southern Lake Champlain: Vermont 22A CORNWALL 74 West 9% Cream Cornwall Agriculture Hill Barren LAPHAM BAY 16% Lake Champlain - Richelieu River Watershed 9N Branch School ACCESS AREA <0.1% (historical) 125 Hancock Salisbury SALISBURY Station West Salisbury Penfield Lake ok ro Dunmore Pond t B n 7 a r G k ree Brush 100 Southern Lake Champlain Watersheds C Salisbury ile 22A 4% em Shoreham iv 30 F Satans 74 Kingdom 74 74 Richville C Rochester 28N hilso n B J WHITING ro o Leicester o n k e East Whiting 87 SHOREHAM s Shoreham LEToIwCtaiEd STER k B Leicester Fernville e 22 r Robinson e o (historical) r 9N o Junction Lake C 22A k 73 m SCHROON a TICONDEROGA 74 LARRABEES Champlain n Goshen t POINT AA u k P oo Putnam Br k er ESSEX ADDISON Pond o pp 73 87 ro e B P COUNTY COUNTY t MOUNT u ro INDEPENDENCE Forest k T o HISTORIC SITE ADDISON Dale o r Hough Crossing B y COUNTY e Forest l i ESSEX R 62% VT Berrymill 30 COUNTY stCr ORWELL Ea ee S Mount Pleasant Pond k a 73 9N ok n BRANDON o f r Orwell o k B r Sudbury o er d Brandon o t r B r a k 73 B h e r C o t e NY r o u k o C r Michigan t Hyde T s a Manor E k r WARREN o F EAST h t CREEK Burr Pittsfield COUNTY u PUTNAM o WMA Pond S 9 H S Sugar 28N ag u ue c Sunrise B k SUNSET LAKE Hinkum Hollow r e o C Lake Wintergreen ok r h ACCESS AREA Lake B Pond a Stacy SUDBURY r Lake r o t George o e Crossroads k r RUTLAND B Sunset Echo 8 r 22A Hortonia WARREN o Lake COUNTY o Lake North COUNTY k Chittenden RUTLAND Beebe POND Benson South Lake A Pond HORICON HAGUE WOODS WMA STATE Landing COUNTY ok 7 BOAT LAUNCH Bro Legend nd South Lake B Grangerville Po e Mud Pond 100 ok ab k ro J Florence o Fly B Population Center o BENSON North 28 r HUBBARDTON PITTSFORD B Benson Sherburne k Hubbardton y Chittenden o HUBBARDTON Pittsford a o B r BATTLEFIELD t B HORICON s 30 l e Jabe l i 87 w Pond East h M Island t Hubbardton r SARATOGA Pond o Road Centerlines WASHINGTON N 22 COUNTY COUNTY B87ENNINGTON k o o 3 COUNTY r C Major Road Cold THE B a r s BOMOSEEN t e l Spring r LOVES e East 28 8 NARROWS k e STATE PARK t WHIPPLE iv c o WMA MARSH u Mountain Pittsford R Glen n HOLLOW S k R 8 9 n Lake WMA o WEST RUTLAND WMA View SugarwRooedgional Road k o i o t v o r d West e Estates o r STATE FOREST Hill r B r a Proctor Prospect B Castleton Crystal Lake Champlain Canal (0201000101) b n Pinnacle o Ransomvale b n West t Hill u Bomoseen, o Beach Ridge e t Local Road r r Haven H Colonial o Lake 22A B Mendon 4 H Estates Pinecrest h WEST t PROCTOR Lake Champlain Direct-Crane Point to Thompsons Point (0201000806) r Acres Inman Bomoseen o EPA 30C3ha(sadnn)a List of Impaired Surface Waters GREEN N RUTLAND Pond Avalon Beach Countryside Acres DUMP Blue Neshobe Estates Lake Champlain Direct-Ticonderoga Creek to Crane Point (0201000803) WEST MARSH QUARRY Ridge Beach CASTLETON Part A (TMDL required) POND WMA Acres HAVEN Point of Old Marsh Heritage Hill Pines PELLETIER 8 ok 3 Class A WatDeevrelsopment Brewers Lake Champlain Direct-south end (0201000801) ro Pond POND SITE BLUEBERRY B Green Corner ke HILL WMA La Marolin Acres BasseAttcres Brookwood e Durgy Hill in FAIR 4 Development Estates P Heights Class A(2) PublEiacst rWidgeater Supplies Lake George and Ticonderoga Creek (0201000802) Castleton Center Rutland Pine HAVEN Castleton Grandview Acres In Rutland d Lake Corners Acres ia DRESDEN Hydeville 4A n 9N Fair Class A(1)K Eillicngotolnogical Waters 9 B 4A Brookside Billings Mettawee River (0201000102) r Haven o BIRD West Mobile Heights o IRA Trailer k 4 Blissville MOUNTAIN Rutland Park Manor 28 F 4 i n WMA k Class A(2) Public Water Supplies Poultney River (0201000103) l WARD e B BOLTON MARSH WMA r k o o EAST o k o r BAY STATE 22A Gorhamtown Priority Waters Outside 303(d) List H B u k WETLANDS WARRENSBURG o e d o r k d B i l k e oc P ok 30 B R ro Alfrecha PNaortht C stream (further assessment) PACK DEMONSTRATION 87 r g k B o in d o u o lv Clarendon FOREST (SUNY e o Whitehall M k Sh r COLLEGE OF ESF) B d Clarendon Part E stream (altered exotic species) n 7B a 87 l Springs n e HAMPTON Pierces e Trout r Cold S Corner G Lake p Part F stream (altered flow regulatiRoivner) e c t Ira a c POULTNEY North l k e WHITEHALL Cree East 133 East Shrewsbury B astle Part E waterbody (altered exotic species) rook C Poultney Clarendon 4 Poultney Chippenhook k Public LaClnaredndon o E B ro d ut m te Crossett B 7 rn e u Lake u p Shrewsbury n t B Pond o d r H BUCZEK s o t Green Mountain National Forest B o MIDDLETOWN k un MARSH WMA r George o o M o SPRINGS k 22A LAKE SAINT 7BState Lands Sm Lake it CATHERINE Burnham Middletown 9 h B Cuttingsville ro Pond STATE PARK Hollow Springs ok Adirondack Park Admin Boundary South 103 Poultney r E Lake Saint e 133 v n i g Wallingford l Nebo 31 Catherine, R i s y h Lake e B tn r l Timber Hill o ou o P Estates k 22 WASHINGTON (subdivision) Political Boundaries140 Mount COUNTY 30 Holly Tinmouth 9L 22 Bowlsville LAKE FORT ANN Town Line East Wallingford PROSPECT GEORGE MOUNTAIN STATE Lake WELLS State Boundary George Hadlock Copeland SPECIAL USE AREA Little Pond Pond GRANVILLE East Lake Wells West Bis Tinmouth County Boundary 9N ho Fort Ann Wells We p Winchel South st B l C Belmont B r re o e Wallingford ro k o o 22 155 k Granville k TINMOUTH Lake Champlain 149 40 Martins Tarbellville Creek Pond 149 fway Hal Part A - TMDL required (PCBs) 87 Scottsville Part D - approved TMDL (Phosphorus) North Part E - altered exotic species (Eurasian 9 Pawlet Watermilfoil, Zebra Mussel, and Russellville Butler 133 DANBY Glen KINGSBURY Butternut Pond 149 Dense Water Chesnut Lake re igC ek 30 (Southern Sections Only)) B k ee Cr 149 HARTFORD ay West PAWLET Danby Four 87 w 4 lf Pawlet Corners Mount a 40 I H n d Tabor i a Pawlet n Danby R B HEBRON i i v g QUEENSBURY e C r 7 254 r e e Halfway C k re ek 9N GLENS 32 196 South FALLS End 254 Hudson GREEN MOUNTAIN Falls South 196 NATIONAL FOREST Glens North Falls Rupert UPPER HUDSON 40 RIVER STATE W RUPERT RALPH ROAD STATE oo BENNINGTON BOAT LAUNCH d MULTIPLE C North r 22 USE AREA e COUNTY Dorset 87 e k East 32 Rupert 87 9 Fort Edward 30 DORSET North 197 Rupert Met tawee River Landgrove Freedleyville 197 Dorset Corinth MOREAU FORT West East MOREAU LAKE Argyle Rupert Dorset Landgrove STATE PARK EDWARD ARGYLE Town Center 11 Sherwood Peru Forest 32 4 South Dorset Londonderry Bromley 40 Village 9 100 Miles 7A 11 0 1.25 2.5 5 7.5 10 30 South 50 32 Beartown Barnumville Londonderry.
Recommended publications
  • Dams and Reservoirs in the Lake Champlain Richelieu River Basin
    JUST THE FACTS SERIES June 2019 DAMS AND RESERVOIRS IN THE LAKE CHAMPLAIN RICHELIEU RIVER BASIN MYTH Water released from tributary dams in the United States causes flooding in Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River. FACT Water levels in Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River Generally, mass releases of water from flood control are primarily affected by precipitation from rain or dams are avoided. In addition to compromising the snowmelt. structural integrity of the dams, mass releases would also endanger the very communities that these dams are built Because of its size, Lake Champlain can store a lot of to protect. water; the flood control dams and reservoirs in the basin, which are very small in comparison to the lake, do not When conditions force the release of more water than significantly change water levels of the lake and river as hydropower plants can handle, the increase in water they release water. levels immediately below the dam will be much greater than the increase on Lake Champlain. This is true even during high water and flooding events. Consider, for instance, when Lake Champlain and the Richelieu River experienced extreme flooding between April and June 2011, the additional releases flowing from Waterbury Reservoir—the largest flood control reservoir in the Vermont portion of the basin, contributed less than 2 centimetres (¾ inch) to the elevation of Lake Champlain and the upper Richelieu River. International Lake Champlain-Richelieu River Study Board FACT FACT Dams in the US portion of the basin are built for one of Waterbury Reservoir in Vermont is the largest reservoir two purposes: flood control or hydroelectric power.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mapping of Samuel De Champlain, 1603–1635 Conrad E
    51 • The Mapping of Samuel de Champlain, 1603–1635 Conrad E. Heidenreich The cartography of Samuel de Champlain marks the be- roster of 1595 he was listed as a fourier (sergeant) and aide ginning of the detailed mapping of the Atlantic coast north to the maréchal de logis (quartermaster), apparently of Nantucket Sound, into the St. Lawrence River valley, reaching the rank of maréchal himself.4 The same pay ros- and, in a more cursory fashion, to the eastern Great Lakes. ter states that in 1595 he went on a secret mission for the Previous maps were based on rapid ship-board reconnais- king that was regarded to be of some importance. He also sance surveys made in the early to middle sixteenth cen- made a “special report” to Henri IV after his West Indian tury, particularly on the expeditions of Jacques Cartier and voyage (1601) and after the first two voyages to Canada Jean-François de La Rocque, sieur de Roberval (1534 – (1603 and 1607). These reports seem to indicate that 43). These maps conveyed little more than the presence of Champlain had a personal relationship with Henri IV, a stylized coastline. The immediate result of the Cartier- probably accounting for the pension the king awarded him Roberval expeditions was that France lost interest in sometime before 1603.5 After the war, Champlain joined North America, except for fishing off the northeast coast. his uncle’s ship, the 500-tun Saint-Julien, in Spanish The indigenous population was considered impoverished Caribbean service.6 In June 1601, Champlain was in and hostile, there were no quick riches, and the winters Cádiz where he was a witness to his dying uncle’s testa- were so brutal that the French wondered whether Euro- ment leaving him a large estate near La Rochelle as well as peans could live there.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex VIII Casestudy0304 Ch
    IEA Hydropower Implementing Agreement Annex VIII Hydropower Good Practices: Environmental Mitigation Measures and Benefits Case study 03-04: Fish Migration and River Navigation - Chambly Dam, Canada Key Issues: 3- Fish Migration and River Navigation Climate Zone: Cf: Temperate Subjects: - Fishway Effects: - Allow upstream migration of juvenile American eel ( Anguilla rostrata ) Project Name: Chambly Dam Country: Canada Implementing Party & Period - Project: Hydro-Québec 1965 - Good Practice: Hydro-Québec 1997 Key Words: American eel, ladder, fish migration, Chambly Dam Abstract: For 150 years, the Richelieu River (Québec, Canada) supported a sizable commercial silver American eel fishery. A sharp and constant decline of annual landings since 1981 has been at least partly related to the rebuilding, in 1965, of an old cribwork. In 1997, a ladder was retrofitted on the 270-m Chambly Dam to allow eel migration and enhance recruitment. 1. Outline of the Project Chambly Dam is located on the Richelieu River, a tributary of the St. Lawrence near Montréal (Québec, Canada). It is a 270-m-long concrete overflow weir and the water head is approximately 5 m. It was built in 1965 to replace an old cribwork dam that was constructed in 1896. 2. Features of the Project Area The Richelieu River drains Lake Champlain, a large lake bordering New York and Vermont states (USA) and extending into Québec. Lake Champlain is connected to the Hudson River and to the Great Lakes by a network of locks and canals. The Richelieu River extends for 115 km between Lake Champlain and the St. Lawrence River. Figure 1 Location Map of the project From June to September, the average discharge is 271 m3/s (1937-1996) or about 3.5% of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 Major Drainage Basins
    HUC 8 HYDROLOGIC UNIT NAME CLINTON 04120101 Chautauqua-Conneaut FRANKLIN 04150409 CHAMPLAIN MASSENA FORT COVINGTON MOOERS ST LAWRENCE CLINTON 04120102 Cattaraugus BOMBAY WESTVILLE CONSTABLE CHATEAUGAY NYS Counties & BURKE LOUISVILLE 04120103 Buffalo-Eighteenmile BRASHER 04150308 CHAZY ALTONA ELLENBURG BANGOR WADDINGTON NORFOLK MOIRA 04120104 Niagara ESSEX MALONE DEC Regions JEFFERSON 6 04150307 BEEKMANTOWN MADRID 05010001 Upper Allegheny LAWRENCE BELLMONT STOCKHOLM DANNEMORA BRANDON DICKINSON PLATTSBURGH LEWIS OGDENSBURG CITY LISBON 05010002 Conewango 5 PLATTSBURGH CITY HAMILTON POTSDAM SCHUYLER FALLS SARANAC 05010004 French WARREN OSWEGATCHIE DUANE OSWEGO 04150306 PERU 04130001 Oak Orchard-Twelvemile CANTON PARISHVILLE ORLEANS WASHINGTON NIAGARA DE PEYSTER ONEIDA MORRISTOWN HOPKINTON WAVERLY PIERREPONT FRANKLIN 04140101 Irondequoit-Ninemile AUSABLE MONROE WAYNE BLACK BROOK FULTON SARATOGA DEKALB HERKIMER BRIGHTON GENESEE SANTA CLARA CHESTERFIELD 04140102 Salmon-Sandy ONONDAGA NYS Major 04150406 MACOMB 04150304 HAMMOND ONTARIO MADISON MONTGOMERY RUSSELL 04150102 Chaumont-Perch ERIE SENECA CAYUGA SCHENECTADY HERMON WILLSBORO ST ARMAND WILMINGTON JAY WYOMING GOUVERNEUR RENSSELAER ALEXANDRIA CLARE LIVINGSTON YATES 04130002 Upper Genesee OTSEGO ROSSIE COLTON CORTLAND ALBANY ORLEANS 04150301 04150404 SCHOHARIE ALEXANDRIA LEWIS 7 EDWARDS 04150408 CHENANGO FOWLER ESSEX 04130003 Lower Genesee 8 TOMPKINS CLAYTON SCHUYLER 9 4 THERESA 04150302 TUPPER LAKE HARRIETSTOWN NORTH ELBA CHAUTAUQUA CATTARAUGUS PIERCEFIELD 02050104 Tioga ALLEGANY STEUBEN
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Waters of Vermont
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 424 SURFACE WATERS OF VERMONT BY C. H. PIERCE Prepared in cooperation with the STATE OF VERMONT WASHINGTON GOVEENMENT PBINTING OFFICE 1917 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BK PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 25 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation................................................................ 8 Division of work.......................................................... 8 Definition of terms......................................................... 9 Explanation of data........................................................ 9 Accuracy of field data and computed results................................ 11 Gaging stations maintained in Vermont..................................... 12 St. Lawrence River basin................................................. 13 Lake Champlain drainage basin......................................... 13 General features................................................... 13 Gaging-station records.............................................. 14 Lake Champlain at Burlington, Vt.............................. 14 Lake Champlain outlet (Richelieu River) at Chambly, Province of Quebec.1................................................. 20 Poultney Eiver near Fair Haven, Vt............................ 25 Otter Creek at Middlebury,
    [Show full text]
  • Montréal-Est 40 15 Saint-Hyacinthe 640 138 440 25 223 Sainte-Julie 20 344 229 40 Boucherville Beloeil
    Western New England Greenway Upper Housatonic Valley National Heritage Area & Champlain Valley National Heritage Partnership Long Island Sound to Montreal Quebec - Route Map 6 of 6: North Hero, Vermont to Montreal, Quebec National Park Service/U.S. Department of the Interior rom North Hero, VT to Montreal it is flat so it is F the wind to be aware of not the hills. A short 10 mile loop around Isle La Motte will take you past Quebec City quarries with the oldest known fossils in the world and the site of Samuel de Champlain’s landing in QUEBEC 40 173 Vermont. Have your passport ready when you get to 20 the border follow the directions to meet Route Verte Montreal 55 in Lacoile, QC. Halfway to St. Jean sur Richelieu are 201 10 Sherbrooke signs Route de Forts which will lead you Ft. Lennox. 15 St. Jean sur Richelieu A short boat ride to the island fort is both fun and 89 ME educational. In St. Jean sur Richelieu the bike path 91 Burlington along the Chambly Canal starts at Pont Gouin and Augusta Montpelier 95 ends near Ft. Chambly. 87 VT 93 Portland Chambly to Montreal becomes more urban the farther 89 NH you go but it is all on bike paths or bike lanes. Once NY Concord you enter the Montreal area you are in a complex with Manchester hundreds of miles of bike paths and lanes and unless Albany 91 93 90 it’s race time you can ride the Formula One track. MA 90 Boston Springeld Providence Hartford RI 87 CT 95 84 New York City Western New England Greenway Section 6: North Hero, Vermont to Montreal, Quebec Cue Sheet VT 211.7 NORTH HERO - Continue on Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Function of the Champlain Canal Relative to AIS Transfer: Past, Present and Future
    Morphology and Function of the Champlain Canal relative to AIS Transfer: Past, Present and Future J. Ellen Marsden University of Vermont St. Lawrence R. Richelieu River Chambly Canal Lake Champlain Champlain Erie Canal Canal Mohawk River Hudson River St. Lawrence R. Richelieu River Chambly Canal Lake Champlain Mohawk River Hudson River St. Lawrence R. Richelieu River Lake Champlain Champlain Canal Mohawk River Hudson River Champlain Canal Glens Falls Feeder Canal 7 89 11 5 6 12 Whitehall 4 Fort 3 Fort 2 Ann Lake Champlain Waterford 1 Edward Hudson River Vectors of exotic species introduced into Lake Champlain N = 48 species (+1) (Marsden and Hauser 2009 Exotic species in Lake Champlain. JGLR 35:25-265) illegal stocked unintentional & bait Champlain Canal – 40% of AIS Chambly canalscanals unknown 0 5 10 15 20 Number of Species Introductions via the Champlain Canal Purple loosestrife Bythinia Water chestnut Woodland pondsnail Yellow floating heart? Banded mystery snail Flowering rush? Buffalo pebble snail European frog’s bit? Sharp hornsnail Slender-leafed naiad? Piedmont snail Zebra mussel Carp Asian clam (en route) Blue-back herring Gizzard shad Water flea (Eubosmina) Brook silverside Spiny water flea (Bythotrephes) White perch (en route) Largemouth bass Lake Champlain as an exotic From St. Lawrence to Hudson species conduit… silver lamprey St. Lawrence R. longnose gar bowfin Richelieu River brook stickleback Chambly rock bass Canal logperch Lake liver elimia Champlain Champlain Canal Mohawk River Hudson River from Daniels 2001 Lake Champlain as an exotic From St. Lawrence to Hudson species conduit… silver lamprey St. Lawrence R. longnose gar bowfin Richelieu River brook stickleback Chambly rock bass Canal logperch Lake liver elimia Champlain From Hudson to St.
    [Show full text]
  • 493 St. Lawrence River Basin 04295000 Richelieu River
    ST. LAWRENCE RIVER BASIN 493 04295000 RICHELIEU RIVER (LAKE CHAMPLAIN) AT ROUSES POINT, NY LOCATION.--Lat 44°59'46", long 73°21'37", Clinton County, Hydrologic Unit 02010006, on left bank at outlet of Lake Champlain in Rouses Point, and 1.0 mi south of Fort Montgomery ruins. DRAINAGE AREA.--8,277 mi2. PERIOD OF RECORD.--October 1863 to December 1870 (maximum and minimum monthly gage heights at St. Johns, Quebec, published in WSP 97) and March 1871 to current year (daily gage heights prior to October 1970, elevations thereafter: those for 1871-1907 published in WSP 894). Gage heights prior to October 1, 1925, published as "Richelieu River at Fort Montgomery, Rouses Point". Discharge records for January 1875 to September 1916 at "Chambly, Quebec," published in WSP 65, 82, 97, 129, 170, 206, 424, and 1307 have been found to be unreliable and should not be used. Daily discharge record for "Richelieu River at Fryers Rapids, Quebec," published in Water Survey of Canada annual reports. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder. Datum of gage is NGVD of 1929. March 1871 to May 1923, nonrecording gage located in Fort Montgomery and May 1923 to October 1938, nonrecording gage at present site. Prior to October 1970, at datum 93.00 ft higher. REMARKS.--Area of lake surface about 490 mi2. Total volume below 92.5 ft elevation, reported by Lake Champlain Studies Center, 902.2 bil ft3. Telephone gage-height telemeter at station. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum elevation observed, 101.88 ft, Apr. 25, 1993; minimum observed, 92.17 ft, Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality of the Richelieu and Yamaska Rivers, 3
    WATER BIOLOGICAL SEDIMENTS SHORELINES RESOURCES USES Water quality of the Richelieu of the St. Lawrence River. Its mean annual flow was 323 m3/s during the 2001–2003 period, and 484 m3/s during the 2004–2013 period and Yamaska rivers at the municipality of Sorel-Tracy. From its source in Lake Champlain in the United States, the river flows northward into the St. Lawrence Toxic contamination River at Sorel-Tracy. Its main tributaries in Quebec are the South, Huron, Lacolle and Acadia rivers. The Canadian part of the basin Issue measures 3855 km2, which represents 16% of its total area. The watersheds of the Richelieu and Yamaska rivers are located in the Centre du Québec region, where there are numerous socio- The Yamaska River starts in Brome Lake and empties into economic activities. With a drainage basin area of 23 720 km2, the the St. Lawrence River in the Lake Saint-Pierre area. Its watershed Richelieu River is the most significant tributary on the south shore covers a total area of 4784 km2 and is drained by three main tributaries: Black, Yamaska North and Yamaska South East rivers. Figure 1 Drainage basins of the Richelieu The river’s runoff volume is six times smaller than that of the and Yamaska rivers Richelieu River. For the 2001–2003 and 2004–2013 periods, its estimated runoff volume was 46 m3/s and 70 m3/s at Saint-Hyacinthe. The watershed regions of the Richelieu and Yamaska rivers are home to a number of industries specialized in agri-food, chemicals, metals processing, plastics and textiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Jay's Treaty: the Transformation of Lake Champlain Commerce
    Jay’s Treaty: The Transformation of Lake Champlain Commerce The Jay Treaty, ratified by the U.S. Senate in 1795, took real effect in 1796, drastically altering the rules governing Canadian-American inland and lake- borne trade. The pattern of commerce suddenly and dramatically changed. By H. NICHOLAS MULLER III hen its terms became public in 1795, most Americans, in- cluding Vermonters, viewed the Jay Treaty through a polit- Wical prism. They saw its efforts to resolve maritime confl icts with Great Britain, the British occupation of a string of outposts in United States territory, and the agreement to fi rm up the Canadian- American boundary in terms of domestic politics. They correctly thought that it represented the Washington administration’s attempt, led by Alexander Hamilton, to stabilize relations with Great Britain and to maintain the tariff revenue that supported the young republic. The Republican opposition led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madi- son opposed these policies, which they saw as favoring Great Britain. They preferred friendly relations with revolutionary France, which they viewed as a continuation of the French-American alliance formed in the late 1770s during the American Revolution. The French declaration of . H. NICHOLAS MULLER III, currently treasurer of the Vermont Historical Society, is a frequent contributor to Vermont History, which he once edited, about the his- tory of Lake Champlain and the Champlain Valley. A former professor and dean at the University of Vermont, president of Colby-Sawyer College, director of the Wisconsin Historical Society, and CEO of the Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation, he has retired and lives next to the lake in Essex, New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Reliability of the 1760 British Geographical Survey of the St
    Assessing the Reliability of the 1760 British Geographical Survey of the St. Lawrence River Valley by Nicholas Gliserman A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the USC Graduate School University of Southern California In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science (Geographic Information Science and Technology) May 2018 Copyright © 2018 by Nicholas Gliserman ii To my loving wife, Christina Copland iii Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. vi List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... x Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ xi List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... xii Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ xiii Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Towards a Historiographical Synthesis of Archival and Digital Methods .................... 7 2.1. The Underwhelming Presence of Historical Maps in the Spatial Humanities ................... 8 2.2. Scholarship on the Murray
    [Show full text]
  • The Lachine Canal, Montreal, Quebec Pauline Desjardins
    Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 28 Article 5 1999 From the Warehouses to the Canal By Rail ca. 1830: The Lachine Canal, Montreal, Quebec Pauline Desjardins Follow this and additional works at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Desjardins, Pauline (1999) "From the Warehouses to the Canal By Rail ca. 1830: The Lachine Canal, Montreal, Quebec," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 28 28, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.22191/neha/vol28/iss1/5 Available at: http://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol28/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. From the Warehouses to the Canal By Rail ca. 1830: The Lachine Canal, Montreal, Quebec Cover Page Footnote This paper is a part of my dissertation concerning the impact of the Lachine Canal on Montrealers during the 19th century. I would like to thank the old Port of Montreal Corporation for their authorization to use all the date we recovered during the five-year archaeolgocial project, as part of the redevelopment of the old section of the port of Montreal including the lower entrance of the Lachine Canal. My Ph.D. research was made possible with a grant from the Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l'Aide a la Recherche (FCAR). I would also thank the members of CNEHA conference for their support, and particularly Karen Bescherer Metheny for her splendid encouragement and the reviewers for their pertinent comments.
    [Show full text]