DOCSLIB.ORG

Beaufort Sea Oil Spills State of Knowledge Review and Identification of Key Issues

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beaufort Sea Oil Spills State of Knowledge Review and Identification of Key Issues Environmental Studies Research Funds 177 Beaufort Sea Oil Spills State of Knowledge Review and Identification of Key Issues November 2010 Correct citation for this report is: SL Ross Environmental Research Ltd., DF Dickins Associates LLC., Envision Planning Solutions Inc. 2010. Beaufort Sea Oil Spills State of Knowledge Review and Identification of Key Issues. Environmental Studies Research Funds Report No. 177. Calgary. 126p. The Environmental Studies Research Funds are financed from special levies on the oil and gas industry and administered by Natural Resources Canada for the Minister of Natural Resources Canada and the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. The Environmental Studies Research Funds and any person acting on their behalf assume no liability arising from the use of the information contained in this document. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Environmental Studies Research Funds agencies. The use of trade names or identification of specific products does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. Published under the auspices of the Environmental Studies Research Funds NE22-4/177E-PDF Environmental Research Studies Funds Report No. 177 November 2010 Beaufort Sea Oil Spills State of Knowledge Review and Identification of Key Issues by SL Ross Environmental Research Ltd. Ottawa, ON with DF Dickins Associates LLC La Jolla, CA and Envision Planning Solutions Inc. Calgary, AB Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iv Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 3 Oil Spill Behaviour and Modelling in Ice Conditions .................................................................... 5 State of the Art in the Early 1990s.............................................................................................. 5 Research and Development Relative to Oil Spill Behaviour and Modelling in Ice Since 1990 6 Surveillance and Monitoring......................................................................................................... 12 Airborne and Spaceborne Remote Sensing............................................................................... 14 Surface-based Remote Sensing Systems .................................................................................. 21 Tracking and Long-Term Monitoring....................................................................................... 24 Possible Future Technologies ................................................................................................... 26 Containment and Recovery........................................................................................................... 29 State of the Art in the Early 1990s............................................................................................ 29 Research and Development on Containment and Recovery since 1990................................... 29 Summary................................................................................................................................... 34 In-situ Burning (ISB) .................................................................................................................... 35 State of the Art in the Early 1990s............................................................................................ 35 Research and Development Relative to In-situ Burning since 1990 ........................................ 37 Dispersants and the Use of Oil-Mineral Aggregates .................................................................... 48 Dispersant Effectiveness (DE) in Cold Water .......................................................................... 48 Presence of Ice .......................................................................................................................... 49 Brackish Water Influence ......................................................................................................... 50 Remote Location....................................................................................................................... 51 Net Environmental Benefit Analysis and Planning .................................................................. 51 Use of Oil-Mineral Aggregates (OMA).................................................................................... 52 Arctic Oil Spill Waste Management............................................................................................. 55 State of the Art in the Early 1990s............................................................................................ 55 Research and Development on Arctic Oil Spill Waste Management since 1990..................... 56 Shoreline Spill Response .............................................................................................................. 57 Case Histories of Oil Spills in Ice Conditions Since 1990 ........................................................... 61 Acute and Long-term Impacts of Spills and Countermeasures .................................................... 63 Fate of Stranded Oil: The BIOS Experiment............................................................................ 63 Marine Mammals...................................................................................................................... 64 Marine Birds and Waterfowl .................................................................................................... 66 Fish and Fisheries ..................................................................................................................... 67 Environmental Issues with Dispersant Use............................................................................... 70 Environmental Issues with In-Situ Burning.............................................................................. 71 Present Oil Spill Response Capability .......................................................................................... 73 General Reviews and Research Recommendations...................................................................... 77 Research Recommendations in the Early 1990s....................................................................... 77 Reviews and Research Recommendations in the Last Five Years ........................................... 78 -ii- Geo-References............................................................................................................................. 82 Stakeholder Views of Oil Spill Response Options ....................................................................... 84 Task Objectives......................................................................................................................... 84 Approach and Process............................................................................................................... 84 Feedback Results ...................................................................................................................... 87 Summary and Key Focus Areas................................................................................................ 92 References..................................................................................................................................... 95 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................... 117 Appendix A Workshop and Discussion of Key Issues ................................................................... 1 Appendix B Geographic Databases of Coastal Resources, Vulnerabilities and Sensitivities ..... 11 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................. 16 Appendix C List of Stakeholders Contacted................................................................................. 20 List of Stakeholders Contacted ....................................................................................................... 1 Appendix D Beaufort Sea Spill Response Sample Email............................................................... 2 Beaufort Sea Spill Response Sample Email ................................................................................... 1 Appendix E Beaufort Sea Spill Response Survey Form................................................................. 2 Beaufort Sea Spill Response Survey Form..................................................................................... 1 -iii- List of Figures Figure 1: Barge-Based Containment and Recovery System Circa 1990 ...................................... 30 Figure 2: Beaufort Sea Oil Spill Co-op Open Water In-situ Burning System Schematic ............ 36 Figure 3: Beaufort Sea Oil Spill Co-op Aerial Ignition Systems for Spills on and under Ice...... 36 Figure 4: Burning of Oiled Snow, as Proposed in 1990 ............................................................... 37 List of Tables Table 1: Airborne and Space Sensor Comparison for Spills on Water
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Joint Industry Programme
    CETACEAN STOCK ASSESSMENT IN RELATION TO EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION INDUSTRY SOUND by Prepared for Joint Industry Programme 30 September 2009 LGL Report TA4582-1 CETACEAN STOCK ASSESSMENT IN RELATION TO EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION INDUSTRY SOUND by LGL Limited, environmental research associates 22 Fisher Street, POB 280 King City, Ontario, Canada L7B 1A6 9768 Second Street Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 3Y8 and LGL Alaska Research Associates Inc. 1101 East 76th Avenue, Suite B Anchorage, Alaska, United States 99518 Prepared for Joint Industry Programme 30 September 2009 LGL Report TA4582-1 Executive Summary Purpose and Objectives This project investigated the relationship between the oil industry‘s offshore E&P activities and trends in the distribution, abundance and rates of increase of key cetacean stocks found in three areas where E&P activities are intensive. The approach taken was to compare the status and population trends of stocks of key cetacean species in three areas with E&P activities―Alaska (subdivided into three regions, the Beaufort, Bering and Chukchi seas), Australia (Western and southeast regions), and Sakhalin Island, Russia―with corresponding parameters for stocks of the same species (where possible) in areas where E&P activities were absent or greatly reduced. The project involved a critical review of existing and historical data on cetacean stocks, and a compilation of data on E&P activities and non-industry factors that may have influenced stocks, in the areas of interest. Data were assessed in terms of quality, quantity, and temporal and spatial coverage to determine whether sufficient data were available for a reasonable assessment of correlations between cetacean populations and E&P activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Movements and Habitat Use of Muskoxen on Bathurst, Cornwallis
    MOVEMENTS AND HABITAT USE OF MUSKOXEN (Ovibos moschatus) ON BATHURST, CORNWALLIS, AND DEVON ISLANDS, 2003-2006 Morgan Anderson1 and Michael A. D. Ferguson Version: 23 December 2016 1Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, Box 209 Igloolik NU X0A 0L0 STATUS REPORT 2016-08 NUNAVUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH SECTION IGLOOLIK, NU i Summary Eleven muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) were fitted with satellite collars in summer 2003 to investigate habitat preferences and movement parameters in areas where they are sympatric with Peary caribou on Bathurst, Cornwallis, and Devon islands. Collars collected locations every 4 days until May 2006, with 4 muskoxen on Bathurst Island collared, 2 muskoxen collared on Cornwallis Island, and 5 muskoxen collared on western Devon Island. Only 5-29% of the satellite locations were associated with an estimated error of less than 150 m (Argos Class 3 locations). Muskoxen in this study used low-lying valleys and coastal areas with abundant vegetation on all 3 islands, in agreement with previous studies in other areas and Inuit qaujimajatuqangit. They often selected tussock graminoid tundra, moist/dry non-tussock graminoid/dwarf shrub tundra, wet sedge, and sparsely vegetated till/colluvium sites. Minimum convex polygon home ranges representing 100% of the locations with <150 m error include these movements between core areas, and ranged from 233 km2 to 2494 km2 for all collared muskoxen over the 3 years, but these home ranges include large areas of unused habitat separating discrete patches of good habitat where most locations were clustered. Several home ranges overlapped, which is not surprising, since muskoxen are not territorial.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Arctic Marine Atlas
    Lincoln Sea Hall Basin MARINE ATLAS ARCTIC CANADA’S GREENLAND Ellesmere Island Kane Basin Nares Strait N nd ansen Sou s d Axel n Sve Heiberg rdr a up Island l Ch ann North CANADA’S s el I Pea Water ry Ch a h nnel Massey t Sou Baffin e Amund nd ISR Boundary b Ringnes Bay Ellef Norwegian Coburg Island Grise Fiord a Ringnes Bay Island ARCTIC MARINE z Island EEZ Boundary Prince i Borden ARCTIC l Island Gustaf E Adolf Sea Maclea Jones n Str OCEAN n ait Sound ATLANTIC e Mackenzie Pe Ball nn antyn King Island y S e trait e S u trait it Devon Wel ATLAS Stra OCEAN Q Prince l Island Clyde River Queens in Bylot Patrick Hazen Byam gt Channel o Island Martin n Island Ch tr. Channel an Pond Inlet S Bathurst nel Qikiqtarjuaq liam A Island Eclipse ust Lancaster Sound in Cornwallis Sound Hecla Ch Fitzwil Island and an Griper nel ait Bay r Resolute t Melville Barrow Strait Arctic Bay S et P l Island r i Kel l n e c n e n Somerset Pangnirtung EEZ Boundary a R M'Clure Strait h Island e C g Baffin Island Brodeur y e r r n Peninsula t a P I Cumberland n Peel Sound l e Sound Viscount Stefansson t Melville Island Sound Prince Labrador of Wales Igloolik Prince Sea it Island Charles ra Hadley Bay Banks St s Island le a Island W Hall Beach f Beaufort o M'Clintock Gulf of Iqaluit e c n Frobisher Bay i Channel Resolution r Boothia Boothia Sea P Island Sachs Franklin Peninsula Committee Foxe Harbour Strait Bay Melville Peninsula Basin Kimmirut Taloyoak N UNAT Minto Inlet Victoria SIA VUT Makkovik Ulukhaktok Kugaaruk Foxe Island Hopedale Liverpool Amundsen Victoria King
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 2 SUBMISSION to the NUNAVUT WILDLIFE
    SUBMISSION TO THE NUNAVUT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR Information: Decision: X Issue: Downlisting of Peary Caribou from Endangered to Threatened. Background: In October 2016 the Committee on the Status of Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) provided a re‐ assessment of Peary Caribou to the federal Minister of the Environment. This begins the formal listing process under the federal Species at Risk Act. Peary Caribou, which are currently listed under the federal SARA as Endangered, have been re‐assessed by COSEWIC in a lower risk category as Threatened. A recovery strategy is required for both Endangered and Threatened species. If Peary Caribou are downlisted under the federal SARA, a recovery strategy will still be required and it will not affect the current recovery strategy development process currently underway for Peary Caribou GN - Morgan Anderson Community consultations on the proposed downlisting of Peary Caribou were held with hunters and trappers organizations (HTOs) and regional wildlife boards in the range of Peary Caribou between June and August 2017. Organizations were asked to provide their formal position on the proposed downlisting and with any other comments, concerns or information that they feel should be considered. Consultation packages, in Inuktitut and English, were sent by mail and email. They included: a letter, information on the assessment and a questionnaire/response form. Follow‐up calls to the HTOs and RWBs were made on September 27, 2017. Results of Consultation: Kitikmeot Regional Wildlife Board No response
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 -Canadian Arctic Islands Banks Basin
    CHAPTER 5 -CANADIAN ARCTIC ISLANDS BANKS BASIN Age........................ Mesozoic over Paleozoic Depth Target Zones......... Maximum 3000 m to base Mesozoic; up to 2000 m Paleozoic Hydrocarbon Shows......... None First Discovery.............. None Basin Type................. Unstable cratonic margin Depositional Setting......... Marine shelf to basin transitional (Paleozoic); fluvial, transitional and marine shelf (Mesozoic) Potential Reservoirs.......... Mesozoic sandstones, Devonian Blue Fiord carbonates Regional Structure........... North-south series of highs with intervening subbasins, extension faulting, minor folding Seals....................... Transgressive marine shales (Weatherall Formation), basinal shales (Eids Formation) and inter-tonguing marine shales in the Mesozoic section Source Rocks.............. Eids shale and other basinal equivalents of lower Paleozoic shelf carbonates Depth to Oil Window....... Base of Mesozoic is transitional from immature into overmature Paleozoic sediments Total Number of Wells...... 11 (onshore Banks Island) Seismic Coverage............ 9200 km² of reconnaissance seismic Area....................... 60,100 km² (Banks Island) Area under Licence.......... None (Bare tundra, low relief terrain. Population centre at Sachs Harbour on southwestern Banks Island. Extreme winter operating conditions.) Banks Basin contains a moderately thick Mesozoic section overlying a thick sequence of lower Paleozoic carbonates and basinal equivalents. Eleven wells have been drilled without success, but a number
    [Show full text]
  • PETROLEUM EXPLORATION in NORTHERN CANADA a Guide To
    PETROLEUM EXPLORATION IN NORTHERN CANADA A Guide to Oil and Gas Exploration and Potential Northern Oil and Gas Directorate Indian and Northern Affairs Canada 1995 Published under the authority of the Honourable Ronald A. Irwin, P.C., M.P. Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, 1995 QS-8504-OOO-EE-Al Catalogue No. R72-239/1995E ISBN O-662-231 20-l ©Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada Cette publication est également disponible en francais sous le titre : L’exploration pétrolièr gaziére dans le Nord du Canada Indian and Northern Affaires indiennes I*1 Affairs Canada et du Nord Canada Editor: G. R. Morrell Contributors: G.R. Morrell, M. Fortier, P.R. Price and R. Polt ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors have drawn on numerous sources which form an extensive literature on the geology of northern Canada. In many cases figures have been reproduced from these published works. Thanks are due to staff at the National Energy Board, the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and the Geological Survey of Canada for drafting and production. G.E. Reinson and T.D. Bird of the Geological Survey of Canada kindly reviewed the manuscript and provided many useful comments. Special thanks are due to J. Dixon of the Geological Survey of Canada for editing the manuscript and enabling a large part of the production of the publication. PREFACE Petroleum Exploration in Northern Canada has been published to mark the reopening of vast regions of the North to new exploration rights issuance, the first in 25 years in the mainland Northwest Territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Analysis Points to New Plays in the Arctic Islands
    Basin Analysis Points to New Plays in the Arctic Islands Keith Dewing* Geological Survey of Canada, Calgary, AB [email protected] Introduction Generating new exploration ideas in a frontier area, where drilling is widely spaced and petroleum systems poorly known, requires the best possible understanding of the basin history to estimate the areas in which source rocks were likely to produce hydrocarbons, the timing of hydrocarbon generation, the timing of trap formation, and the potential for hydrocarbon preservation. This information can be used to predict which plays are the most prospective. In anticipation of renewed interest in hydrocarbon exploration in the Canadian Arctic Islands, the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) has reviewed the thermal maturity, geochemistry and stratigraphic data from the Canadian Arctic to better constrain the known petroleum systems and identify petroleum systems beyond those that have been previously postulated. Five plays are identified as being the most prospective. There were 185 wells drilled, resulting in the discovery of 20 major petroleum fields, during the 1960 to 1986 oil and gas exploration of the Arctic Islands. Most discoveries in the Sverdrup Basin were found in structural traps in Jurassic strata. While this play will be continue to be important in the next round of exploration, other stratigraphic intervals and other traps may prove to be just as attractive targets. Geological History of the Arctic Islands Strata from three geological provinces have petroleum potential: Ediacaran to Devonian passive to convergent margin sedimentary strata (including undeformed Arctic Platform, and Boothia and Ellesmerian foldbelts); Carboniferous to Cretaceous rift basin sediments and volcanic rocks of the Sverdrup Basin; and Cretaceous–Tertiary rift and passive margin sediments of the Polar Continental Margin and Banks Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Trends in Abundance of Peary Caribou (Rangifer Tarandus Pearyi) and Muskoxen (Ovibos Moschatus) in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Nunavut
    Recent trends in abundance of Peary Caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and Muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Nunavut Deborah A. Jenkins1 Mitch Campbell2 Grigor Hope 3 Jaylene Goorts1 Philip McLoughlin4 1Wildlife Research Section, Department of Environment, P.O. Box 400, Pond Inlet, NU X0A 0S0 2 Wildlife Research Section, Department of Environment, P.O. Box 400, Arviat NU X0A 0S0 3Department of Community and Government Services P.O. Box 379, Pond Inlet, NU X0A 0S0 4Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, 112 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2 2011 Wildlife Report, No.1, Version 2 i Jenkins et al. 2011. Recent trends in abundance of Peary Caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) and Muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, Nunavut. Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, Wildlife Report No. 1, Pond Inlet, Nunavut. 184 pp. RECOMMENDATIONS TO GOVERNMENT i ABSTRACT Updated information on the distribution and abundance for Peary caribou on Nunavut’s High Arctic Islands estimates an across-island total of about 4,000 (aged 10 months or older) with variable trends in abundance between islands. The total abundance of muskoxen is estimated at 17,500 (aged one year or older). The estimates are from a multi-year survey program designed to address information gaps as previous information was up to 50 years old. Information from this study supports the development of Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit (IQ)- and scientifically-based management and monitoring plans. It also contributes to recovery planning as required under the 2011 addition of Peary caribou to Schedule 1 of the federal Species At Risk Act based on the 2004 national assessment as Endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRIBUTION and ABUNDANCE of PEARY CARIBOU (Rangifer Tarandus Pearyii) and MUSKOXEN (Ovibos Moschatus) on the BATHURST ISLAND GROUP, MAY 2013
    DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF PEARY CARIBOU (Rangifer tarandus pearyii) AND MUSKOXEN (Ovibos moschatus) ON THE BATHURST ISLAND GROUP, MAY 2013 NWRT PROJECT 2-13-18 MORGAN ANDERSON WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST, HIGH ARCTIC REGION Submitted in partial fulfillment of funding conditions to the Nunavut Wildlife Management Board September 11, 2014 NUNAVUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH SECTION IGLOOLIK, NU i Summary A survey of the Bathurst Island Group (Bathurst Island Complex [Bathurst, Helena, Cameron, Vanier, Massey, Alexander islands], and Little Cornwallis and Cornwallis islands) was flown by Twin Otter in 42 hours between May 13 and May 27, 2013 to update the population estimate for caribou and muskoxen on the island group. The populations of both species declined precipitously in the late 1990s after a series of severe winters and groundfast ice reduced forage availability. The last survey, in 2001-2002, indicated very minor recovery. Residents of Resolute Bay have reported increasing caribou and muskox populations for several years and requested an updated population estimate. This survey confirmed what residents reported. Caribou were concentrated around Bracebridge Inlet and on Massey and Alexander islands. We observed 559 caribou in total and estimate a population of 1482±387 (95% CI) caribou on Bathurst and its satellite islands. Estimates were not derived for Little Cornwallis and Cornwallis islands, although we saw 1 caribou off-transect on Little Cornwallis Island and another group of 2 caribou off-transect on Cornwallis Island, as well as fresh tracks. This is much higher than the 2001 estimate of 187 (104-330, 95% CI) caribou on the BIC and 2002 estimate of none on Little Cornwallis and Cornwallis islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Island Seasonal Home Range Use by Two Peary Caribou, Canadian High Arctic Islands, Nunavut, 1993Ð94 FRANK L
    ARCTIC VOL. 55, NO. 2 (JUNE 2002) P. 133– 142 Multi-Island Seasonal Home Range Use by Two Peary Caribou, Canadian High Arctic Islands, Nunavut, 1993–94 FRANK L. MILLER1 (Received 30 January 2001; accepted in revised form 9 August 2001) ABSTRACT. A female and a male Peary caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi) were captured on 29 July 1993 on Massey Island, south-central Queen Elizabeth Islands, Nunavut, Canada. Each was fitted with a satellite telemetry neck-collar, released, and tracked by satellite from 1 August 1993 to 31 July 1994. The female caribou used five islands and the male caribou used six islands as seasonal and (collectively) as annual home range. They used five of the six islands (Vanier, Cameron, Alexander, Massey, and Marc) both during the same time periods and at different times. Bathurst Island was used only briefly and only by the male. The male and female occupied the same island at the same time during 54% of the 1993–94 annual cycle. Their seven periods of common occupancy ranged in length from 5 to 88 consecutive days. During the study period, the female moved from one island to another on 11 separate occasions, and the male, on 16 occasions. The female’s periods of residence on each island ranged in length from 4 to 95 consecutive days, and the male’s from 2 to 169 consecutive days. Their seasonal and annual range-use patterns suggest a degree of flexibility and adaptability to a variable and taxing environment and indicate the important role that relatively small islands play in the ecology of Peary caribou.
    [Show full text]
  • Peary Caribou Distribution Within the Bathurst Island Complex Relative to the Boundary Proposed for Qausuittuq National Park, Nunavut
    15th North American Caribou Workshop Whitehorse, Canada 12-16 May, 2014 Peary caribou distribution within the Bathurst Island Complex relative to the boundary proposed for Qausuittuq National Park, Nunavut Kim G. Poole1, Anne Gunn2, Jack Wierzchowski3 & Morgan Anderson4 1 Aurora Wildlife Research, 1918 Shannon Point Rd., Nelson, British Columbia, V1L 6K1, Canada (Corresponding author: [email protected]). 2 368 Roland Road, Salt Spring Island, British Columbia, V8K 1V1, Canada. 3 Geomar Consulting Inc., Stuben, Austria. 4 Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, P.O. Box 209, Igloolik, Nunavut, X0A 0L0, Canada. Abstract: How caribou (Rangifer tarandus), including Peary caribou (R. t. pearyi), use their annual ranges varies with changes in abundance. While fidelity to some seasonal ranges is persistent, use of other areas changes. Consequently, understanding changes in seasonal distribution is useful for designing boundaries of protected areas for caribou conser- vation. A case in point is the proposed Qausuittuq (Northern Bathurst Island) National Park for Bathurst Island and its satellite islands in the High Arctic of Canada. Since 1961, Peary caribou have been through three periods of high and low abundance. We examined caribou distribution and composition mapped during nine systematic aerial surveys (1961–2013), unsystematic helicopter surveys (1989–98), and limited radio-collaring from 1994–97 and 2003–06. While migration patterns changed and use of southern Bathurst Island decreased during lows in abundance, use of satellite islands, especially Cameron Island for winter range, persisted during both highs and lows in abundance. The northeast coast of Bathurst Island was used to a greater extent during the rut and during summer at low abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • PP1824 Chapter I: Geology and Assessment of Undiscovered Oil
    Geology and Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Sverdrup Basin Province, Arctic Canada, 2008 Chapter I of The 2008 Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal Professional Paper 1824 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Northwestward view across the southern foothills of the Brooks Range along Akmagolik Creek, approximately 150 miles southwest of Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. Exposed rocks are part of the Mississippian–Pennsylvanian Lisburne Group and include a thrust-fault ramp at left. Photo includes two helicopters for scale, a blue-and-white one near the center and a red one at center-right at creek level. U.S. Geological Survey photograph by David Houseknecht. Geology and Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Sverdrup Basin Province, Arctic Canada, 2008 By Marilyn E. Tennyson and Janet K. Pitman Chapter I of The 2008 Circum-Arctic Resource Appraisal Edited by T.E. Moore and D.L. Gautier Professional Paper 1824 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2020 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]