DOCSLIB.ORG

Protecting Threatened Species and Ecological Communities from Invasive Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protecting Threatened Species and Ecological Communities from Invasive Species Protecting threatened species and ecological communities from invasive species December 2012 Invasive Species Council PO Box 166, Fairfield, Victoria 3078 Email: [email protected] | Web: www.invasives.org.au The Invasive Species Council campaigns for better laws and policies to protect the Australian environment from weeds, invasive animals and exotic pathogens. The Invasive Species Council is committed to fostering community participation and activism, supporting our members to have a voice on invasive species issues. Protecting threatened species and ecological communities from invasive species Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Invasive species are a major cause of extinction and threaten about three-quarters of Australia’s threatened species and ecological communities ............. 4 2. As new species arrive and existing invaders increase and spread, the threats of invasive species are increasing. ............................................................... 5 3. Climate change will exacerbate the threats of invasive species ............................................................................................................................................. 6 4. Management of invasive species has been ineffective. ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 5. There is no commitment to the invasive species target in Australia’s Biodiversity Conservation Strategy.............................................................................. 7 6. Key threatening process provisions are poorly used and ineffective ...................................................................................................................................... 7 7. There are major legislative gaps in regulating actions involving invasive species within Australia ....................................................................................... 10 8. Resources for invasive species management are woefully inadequate ............................................................................................................................... 11 9. A proposal for Environment Health Australia ....................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix 1. State of the Environment 2011 – verdict on invasive species .................................................................................................................................. 15 Appendix 2. Yellow crazy ants .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Appendix 3. The cost of saving the Kimberley’s wildlife .............................................................................................................................................................. 17 Appendix 3. What weeds do ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Introduction Conservation Strategy – to reduce invasive species impacts on threatened biodiversity by 10%. There has been no feasibility assessment, no baseline To properly document the threats of invasive species and the ways in which current assessment and no costed plan for implementation, rendering the target merely laws, policies and programs are failing to protect threatened species and ecological aspirational and destined to fail. communities from invasive species would require a substantial treatise. We provide here only a brief summation and a few case studies to exemplify major gaps in our national capacity to protect threatened biodiversity from invasive species. We address four terms of reference: 1. Invasive species are a major cause of extinction and threaten about three-quarters of Australia’s (a) key threats to listed species and ecological communities; threatened species and ecological communities (d) regulatory and funding arrangements at all levels of government; Australia has suffered dozens of extinctions due largely to invasive species, (e) timeliness and risk management within the listings processes; including the most recent just three years ago – the Christmas Island pipistrelle. (f) the historical record of state and territory governments on these matters We lead the world in mammal extinctions due mainly to invasive predators, and many more mammals are on the brink, including in northern Australia previously Invasive species impacts warrant a substantial focus by the inquiry for the following thought to be secure because of low levels of habitat loss.1 More than 70% of 1700 reasons: species listed as nationally threatened and more than 80% of listed ecological • Invasive species are one of the four major threats to biodiversity (the communities are imperilled by introduced animals, plants or diseases. The extent of others being land clearing, damaging fire regimes and climate change) and threat is poorly documented and is probably worse than documented. interact synergistically with other major threats such as climate change and Extinctions due substantially to invasive species include: fire. • 25 mammals (19 species, 6 subspecies), probably mostly due to cats, • Invasive species impacts are increasing, and many more extinctions are foxes, rabbits likely unless there is a greater commitment by Australian governments to prevention, eradication, containment and control of invasive species. • 13 island birds (3 species, 10 subspecies) due mainly to rats, cats and pigs • There are major gaps in legislation, policy and programs, at federal and • 4 frogs due to chytrid fungus state/territory level, which can be addressed to abate threats. • 4 plants due to weeds Our main message to the inquiry is the need for a more business-like, fair dinkum Invasive species threats to listed species and ecological communities: approach to invasive species threats – to identify long-term goals and targets that reflect the immense intrinsic and instrumental values of Australia’s species and • Invasive plants and animals threaten 61% of nationally listed threatened ecological communities; develop costed plans for prioritised, realistic goals; close species 2 major gaps in legislation and policy; and properly and productively involve the 3 • Diseases (mostly exotic) threaten 15% of listed threatened species community sector in policy-setting, decision-making and on-ground conservation. The current approach to conserving Australia’s species and ecological communities is the opposite of business-like. Environmental goals are often not taken seriously, 1 Fitzsimons J, Legge S, Traill B, Woinarski J. 2010. Into Oblivion? The Disappearing Native are almost never met, and failures have no consequences for those in charge. A Mammals of Northern Australia. The Nature Conservancy: Melbourne. prime example of this is the invasive species target of Australia’s Biodiversity 2 Evans M, Watson J, Fuller R, Venter O, Bennett S, Marsack P, Possingham H. 2011. The spatial distribution of threats to species in Australia. BioScience 61: 281-289. • Invasive species threaten >80% of nationally listed ecological communities 2. As new species arrive and existing invaders Weeds have caused few extinctions but are a major contributor to threat increase and spread, the threats of invasive species syndromes and degradation. They can dominate landscapes - In NSW, for example, weeds account for 52 (43%) of the 120 most widely distributed plant are increasing. 4 species – and compromise ecological processes such as fire and nutrient cycles. The State of the Environment 2011 reported that invasive species impacts on See Appendix 4 for an outline of weed impacts. biodiversity were deteriorating. See Appendix 1 for a more detailed summary of the Australia ranks globally as one of the worst affected countries in terms of numbers State of the Environment findings. The deteriorating trend is due to an accelerating of invasive species and the ecological damage sustained. There is considerable rate of new invaders (such as myrtle rust and Asian honeybees) and the spread of government rhetoric about Australia’s “enviable biosecurity system” and our relative already established species. freedom from major pests and diseases. While our agricultural industries enjoy The majority of introduced species already in Australia are yet to achieve the full trade advantages due to freedom from many of the world’s most damaging pests extent of their potential spread and density: and diseases, there is nothing enviable about our record on environmental biosecurity.5 Contrary to the claim in the guide to the Quarantine Proclamation Australia is in the throes of ecological upheaval, and most of this change is coming 1998 that ‘Australians generally benefit from a natural environment that, compared … from old pests tightening their grip on the land. It is important to understand that most pests in Australia have yet to occupy their full range: they are still migrating to other countries, is relatively free of many debilitating pests and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Biodiversity and Climate Change
    Australia’s Biodiversity and Climate Change A strategic assessment of the vulnerability of Australia’s biodiversity to climate change A report to the Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council commissioned by the Australian Government. Prepared by the Biodiversity and Climate Change Expert Advisory Group: Will Steffen, Andrew A Burbidge, Lesley Hughes, Roger Kitching, David Lindenmayer, Warren Musgrave, Mark Stafford Smith and Patricia A Werner © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 ISBN 978-1-921298-67-7 Published in pre-publication form as a non-printable PDF at www.climatechange.gov.au by the Department of Climate Change. It will be published in hard copy by CSIRO publishing. For more information please email [email protected] This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the: Commonwealth Copyright Administration Attorney-General's Department 3-5 National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600 Email: [email protected] Or online at: http://www.ag.gov.au Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for Climate Change and Water and the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts. Citation The book should be cited as: Steffen W, Burbidge AA, Hughes L, Kitching R, Lindenmayer D, Musgrave W, Stafford Smith M and Werner PA (2009) Australia’s biodiversity and climate change: a strategic assessment of the vulnerability of Australia’s biodiversity to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Phthiraptera) Q
    International Journal for Parasitology 47 (2017) 347–356 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal for Parasitology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpara Comparative cophylogenetics of Australian phabine pigeons and doves (Aves: Columbidae) and their feather lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) q a, b a Andrew D. Sweet ⇑, R. Terry Chesser , Kevin P. Johnson a Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1816 S. Oak St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA b USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013, USA article info abstract Article history: Host–parasite coevolutionary histories can differ among multiple groups of parasites associated with the Received 26 October 2016 same group of hosts. For example, parasitic wing and body lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) of New World Received in revised form 16 December 2016 pigeons and doves (Aves: Columbidae) differ in their cophylogenetic patterns, with body lice exhibiting Accepted 22 December 2016 higher phylogenetic congruence with their hosts than wing lice. In this study, we focus on the wing and Available online 10 February 2017 body lice of Australian phabine pigeons and doves to determine whether the patterns in New World pigeons and doves are consistent with those of pigeons and doves from other regions. Using molecular Keywords: sequence data for most phabine species and their lice, we estimated phylogenetic trees for all three Wing lice groups (pigeons and doves, wing lice and body lice), and compared the phabine (host) tree with both par- Body lice Australia asite trees using multiple cophylogenetic methods. We found a pattern opposite to that found for New Hippoboscid flies World pigeons and doves, with Australian wing lice showing congruence with their hosts, and body lice exhibiting a lack of congruence.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 74/Thursday, April 16, 2020/Notices
    21262 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Notices acquisition were not included in the 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA Comment (1): We received one calculation for TDC, the TDC limit would not 22041–3803; (703) 358–2376. comment from the Western Energy have exceeded amongst other items. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Alliance, which requested that we Contact: Robert E. Mulderig, Deputy include European starling (Sturnus Assistant Secretary, Office of Public Housing What is the purpose of this notice? vulgaris) and house sparrow (Passer Investments, Office of Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban The purpose of this notice is to domesticus) on the list of bird species Development, 451 Seventh Street SW, Room provide the public an updated list of not protected by the MBTA. 4130, Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) ‘‘all nonnative, human-introduced bird Response: The draft list of nonnative, 402–4780. species to which the Migratory Bird human-introduced species was [FR Doc. 2020–08052 Filed 4–15–20; 8:45 am]‘ Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.) does restricted to species belonging to biological families of migratory birds BILLING CODE 4210–67–P not apply,’’ as described in the MBTRA of 2004 (Division E, Title I, Sec. 143 of covered under any of the migratory bird the Consolidated Appropriations Act, treaties with Great Britain (for Canada), Mexico, Russia, or Japan. We excluded DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 2005; Pub. L. 108–447). The MBTRA states that ‘‘[a]s necessary, the Secretary species not occurring in biological Fish and Wildlife Service may update and publish the list of families included in the treaties from species exempted from protection of the the draft list.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Animal Species List
    Native animal species list Native animals in South Australia are categorised into one of four groups: • Unprotected • Exempt • Basic • Specialist. To find out the category your animal is in, please check the list below. However, Specialist animals are not listed. There are thousands of them, so we don’t carry a list. A Specialist animal is simply any native animal not listed in this document. Mammals Common name Zoological name Species code Category Dunnart Fat-tailed dunnart Sminthopsis crassicaudata A01072 Basic Dingo Wild dog Canis familiaris Not applicable Unprotected Gliders Squirrel glider Petaurus norfolcensis E04226 Basic Sugar glider Petaurus breviceps E01138 Basic Possum Common brushtail possum Trichosurus vulpecula K01113 Basic Potoroo and bettongs Brush-tailed bettong (Woylie) Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi M21002 Basic Long-nosed potoroo Potorous tridactylus Z01175 Basic Rufous bettong Aepyprymnus rufescens W01187 Basic Rodents Mitchell's hopping-mouse Notomys mitchellii Y01480 Basic Plains mouse (Rat) Pseudomys australis S01469 Basic Spinifex hopping-mouse Notomys alexis K01481 Exempt Wallabies Parma wallaby Macropus parma K01245 Basic Red-necked pademelon Thylogale thetis Y01236 Basic Red-necked wallaby Macropus rufogriseus K01261 Basic Swamp wallaby Wallabia bicolor E01242 Basic Tammar wallaby Macropus eugenii eugenii C05889 Basic Tasmanian pademelon Thylogale billardierii G01235 Basic 1 Amphibians Common name Zoological name Species code Category Southern bell frog Litoria raniformis G03207 Basic Smooth frog Geocrinia laevis
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Migratory and Nomadic Species
    Conserving migratory and nomadic species Claire Alice Runge A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 School of Biological Sciences Abstract Migration is an incredible phenomenon. Across cultures it moves and inspires us, from the first song of a migratory bird arriving in spring, to the sight of thousands of migratory wildebeest thundering across African plains. Not only important to us as humans, migratory species play a major role in ecosystem functioning across the globe. Migratory species use multiple landscapes and can have dramatically different ecologies across their lifecycle, making huge contributions to resource fluxes and nutrient transport. However, migrants around the world are in decline. In this thesis I examine our conservation response to these declines, exploring how well current approaches account for the unique needs of migratory species, and develop ways to improve on these. The movements of migratory species across time and space make their conservation a multidimensional problem, requiring actions to mitigate threats across jurisdictions, across habitat types and across time. Incorporating such linkages can make a dramatic difference to conservation success, yet migratory species are often treated for the purposes of conservation planning as if they were stationary, ignoring the complex linkages between sites and resources. In this thesis I measure how well existing global conservation networks represent these linkages, discovering major gaps in our current protection of migratory species. I then go on to develop tools for improving conservation of migratory species across two areas: prioritizing actions across species and designing conservation networks. Protected areas are one of our most effective conservation tools, and expanding the global protected area estate remains a priority at an international level.
    [Show full text]
  • Partridge Pigeon (Western)
    RECOVERY OUTLINE Partridge Pigeon (western) 1 Family Columbidae 2 Scientific name Geophaps smithii blaauwi Mathews, 1912 3 Common name Partridge Pigeon (western) 4 Conservation status Vulnerable: C2b 5 Reasons for listing most often at the base of a clump of grass (Frith, The few records of this subspecies indicate that the 1982). The species generally lays two eggs (Frith, 1982, population is unlikely to exceed 5,000 mature Higgins and Davies, 1996). individuals. They appear to occur in a single sub- population, for which there is evidence of decline (Vulnerable: C2b). Estimate Reliability Extent of occurrence 30,000 km2 high trend stable medium Area of occupancy 1,000 km2 low trend decreasing medium No. of breeding birds 5,000 low trend decreasing medium No. of sub-populations 1 high Generation time 5 years low 10 Threats 6 Infraspecific taxa The ecological requirements of this subspecies are G. s. smithii (northern Northern Territory) is Near likely to resemble those of the eastern subspecies, for Threatened, which is also the global status of the which a tight temporal and spatial mosaic of burning species. as practised traditionally by Aboriginal people is 7 Past range and abundance probably essential. However, the fire regime has at least partly shifted to one of predominantly late dry Recorded in remote areas within 100 km of the coast season fires that promote invasion by annual sorghum, in the west and north-west of the Kimberley region, a trend that is likely to continue (J. Russell-Smith). northern Western Australia (Storr, 1980, Johnstone, Feral cattle and pigs have been present in the area for 1981, Blakers et al., 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • SWEET-DISSERTATION-2018.Pdf
    UNTANGLING THE COEVOLUTIONARY HISTORY BETWEEN DOVES AND THEIR PARASITIC LICE BY ANDREW DONALD SWEET DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Dr. Kevin Johnson, Chair, Director of Research Professor May Berenbaum Professor James Whitfield Associate Professor Brian Allan Assistant Professor Julian Catchen ABSTRACT In host-parasite systems, any given host species can be associated with multiple types of parasites, each of which can have a unique ecological relationship with the host. However, it remains unclear how these ecological differences link to evolutionary patterns. What shapes the dynamics of a host-parasite interaction over evolutionary time? An ideal approach for addressing this question is to compare multiple lineages of similar parasites that are associated with the same group of hosts but have distinct ecological differences – or “ecological replicates.” For my dissertation, I applied this strategy by focusing on the wing and body lice of doves. These two “ecomorphs” of lice are not closely related yet exclusively parasitize the same group of hosts. Notably, wing lice have a greater capability for dispersal than body lice. Dispersal is an important ecological component of host-parasite interactions and speciation in general. The first part of my dissertation examined broad cophylogenetic patterns across the dove-louse system. I found that wing and body lice did not have correlated patterns, and body lice showed more cospeciation with their hosts. This pattern agreed with previous studies, the results of which suggested that the increased cospeciation in body lice was due to differences in dispersal ability.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioacoustics Reveal Species-Rich Avian Communities Exposed to Organophosphate Insecticides in Macadamia Orchards
    Article Bioacoustics Reveal Species-Rich Avian Communities Exposed to Organophosphate Insecticides in Macadamia Orchards Eduardo Crisol-Martínez 1,2,3,*, Laura T. Moreno-Moyano 4 and Finbarr G. Horgan 2,3,5 1 Department of Agroecology, COEXPHAL (Association of Vegetable and Fruit Growers of Almeria), Carretera de Ronda 11, 04004 Almeria, Spain 2 EcoLaVerna Integral Restoration Ecology, Bridestown, Kildinan T56 CD39, Co. Cork, Ireland; [email protected] 3 Escuela de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Universidad Católica del Maule, Casilla 7-D, Curico, Chile 4 School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; [email protected] 5 Environment and Sustainable Resource Management, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 November 2020; Accepted: 9 December 2020; Published: 14 December 2020 Simple Summary: Conventional commercial orchards often rely on chemical insecticides to control pests and diseases. Organophosphates are among the most widely used insecticides in agriculture. These insecticides are toxic to wildlife, and particularly to birds, which commonly forage for insects in orchards. In this study, we investigated the exposure of birds to a toxic organophosphate (trichlorfon) in Australian macadamia orchards. We used acoustic recorders to quantify bird activity and we used traps to measure insect abundance at six orchards, both before and after trichlorfon applications. Results indicated that the activity of all birds was similar before and after spraying and thus, the birds were exposed to the chemical. Furthermore, trichlorfon applications decreased the numbers of spiders at the orchards. We recorded a high diversity of bird species (62) in the orchards, and most of these birds (80%) were insectivores.
    [Show full text]
  • Husbandry Manual for Dollarbirds
    Husbandry Manual for Dollarbirds Eurystomus orientalis Compiled by: Rebecca Owen Charles Sturt University May 2008 Cover photograph: Dollarbird ( Eurystomus orientalis pacificus ), courtesy of Sharyn Rosewarne. The structure of this manual is based on the guidelines provided by Jackson , SM 2003. Standardising captive-management manuals: guidelines for terrestrial vertebrates . International Zoo Yearbook , vol. 38, pp229-243. 2 Husbandry Manual for Dollarbirds Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 7 2. TAXONOMY 8 2.1 NOMENCLATURE 8 2.2 SUBSPECIES 8 2.3 SYNONYMS 8 2.4 OTHER COMMON NAMES 9 3. NATURAL HISTORY 10 3.1 MORPHOMETRICS 11 3.2 DISTRIBUTION 12 3.3 CONSERVATION STATUS 14 3.4 DIET IN THE WILD 14 3.5 LONGEVITY 14 4. HOUSING REQUIREMENTS 16 4.1 EXHIBIT SIZE 16 4.2 HOLDING AREA DESIGN 16 4.3 SPATIAL REQUIREMENTS 16 4.4 POSITION OF ENCLOSURES 17 4.5 WEATHER PROTECTION 17 4.6 TEMPERATURE REQUIREMENTS 17 4.7 SUBSTRATE 17 4.8 NESTBOXES AND/OR NESTING MATERIAL 18 4.9 ENCLOSURE FURNISHINGS 18 5. GENERAL HUSBANDRY 20 5.1 HYGIENE AND CLEANING 20 5.2 RECORD KEEPING 20 5.3 METHODS OF IDENTIFICATION 21 5.4 ROUTINE DATA COLLECTION 21 6. FEEDING REQUIREMENTS 22 6.1 CAPTIVE DIET 22 6.2 SUPPLEMENTS 23 6.3 PRESENTATION OF FOOD 24 7. HANDLING AND TRANSPORT 25 Husbandry Manual for Dollarbirds 3 7.1 TIMING OF CAPTURE AND HANDLING 25 7.2 CATCHING BAGS 25 7.3 CAPTURE AND RESTRAINT TECHNIQUES 25 7.4 WEIGHING AND EXAMINATION 25 7.5 RELEASE 25 7.6 TRANSPORT REQUIREMENTS 26 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World
    Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World EUGENE M. McCARTHY OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World This page intentionally left blank Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World EUGENE M. MC CARTHY 3 2006 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugual Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2006 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data McCarthy, Eugene M. Handbook of avian hybrids of the world/Eugene M. McCarthy. p. cm. ISBN-13 978-0-19-518323-8 ISBN 0-19-518323-1 1. Birds—Hybridization. 2. Birds—Hybridization—Bibliography. I. Title. QL696.5.M33 2005 598′.01′2—dc22 2005010653 987654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper For Rebecca, Clara, and Margaret This page intentionally left blank For he who is acquainted with the paths of nature, will more readily observe her deviations; and vice versa, he who has learnt her deviations, will be able more accurately to describe her paths.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Account (PDF)
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Felis catus Felis catus System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Mammalia Carnivora Felidae Common name cat (English), domestic cat (English), pusiniveikau (English, Fiji), house cat (English), Hauskatze (German), poti (Maori), feral cat (English) Synonym Similar species Summary Felis catus was domesticated in the eastern Mediterranean c. 3000 years ago. Considering the extent to which cats are valued as pets, it is not surprising that they have since been translocated by humans to almost all parts of the world. Notable predators, cats threaten native birdlife and other fauna, especially on islands where native species have evolved in relative isolation from predators. view this species on IUCN Red List Species Description Felis catus is a small animal in the wild (up to 5kg, but more commonly 1.5 -3.0kg) but may be considerably heavier when domesticated. Colour is extremely variable in domesticated varieties and feral cats commonly revert to black, tabby or tortoiseshell with varying extents of white starting from the belly and breast. Lifecycle Stages Gestation: 65 days. Weaning: 35-40 days. Sexual maturity: 9 months. Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) 2021. Species profile Felis catus. Available Pag. 1 from: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=24 [Accessed 07 October 2021] FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Felis catus Habitat Description Feral cats adapt to a variety of habitat types and circumstances. On the Australian continent they inhabit forests and woodland habitats in eastern, western and northern parts of the country (Dickman 1996). On Hahajima Island, Japan, feral cats have been observed widely in various kinds of habitats, including primary forests (Kawakami and Higuchi 2002).
    [Show full text]