Asian Renewable Energy Hub Terrestrial Fauna and SRE Fauna Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Asian Renewable Energy Hub Terrestrial Fauna and SRE Fauna Survey Asian Renewable Energy Hub Terrestrial Fauna and SRE Fauna Survey Prepared for NW Interconnected Power November 2018 Asian Renewable Energy Hub Level 2 Terrestrial Fauna and SRE Fauna Survey © Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd 2019 ABN 49 092 687 119 Level 1, 228 Carr Place Leederville Western Australia 6007 Ph: (08) 9328 1900 Fax: (08) 9328 6138 Project No.: 1290C Prepared by: V. Ford, J. King Document Quality Checking History Version: 1 Peer review: S. Schmidt, P. Brooshooft Rev 0 Director review: G. Humphreys Rev 0 Format review: G. Humphreys Approved for issue: G. Humphreys This document has been prepared to the requirements of the client identified on the cover page and no representation is made to any third party. It may be cited for the purposes of scientific research or other fair use, but it may not be reproduced or distributed to any third party by any physical or electronic means without the express permission of the client for whom it was prepared or Biota Environmental Sciences Pty Ltd. This report has been designed for double-sided printing. Hard copies supplied by Biota are printed on recycled paper. Cube:Current:1290C (AREH Fauna):Documents:AREH Fauna Rev A.docx 3 Asian Renewable Energy Hub Level 2 Terrestrial Fauna and SRE Fauna Survey 4 Cube:Current:1290C (AREH Fauna):Documents:AREH Fauna Rev A.docx Asian Renewable Energy Hub Level 2 Terrestrial Fauna and SRE Fauna Survey Asian Renewable Energy Hub Level 2 Terrestrial Fauna and SRE Fauna Survey Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 9 1.1 Project Background 9 1.2 Methods 9 1.3 Vertebrate Fauna 9 1.4 Vertebrate Fauna of Conservation Significance 10 1.5 Invertebrate Fauna 11 2.0 Introduction 13 2.1 Project Background 13 2.2 Study Objectives and Scope 13 3.0 Existing Environment 15 3.1 IBRA Bioregions and Subregions 15 3.2 Conservation Reserves 15 3.3 Land Systems 17 3.4 Beard’s Regional Vegetation Mapping 17 4.0 Methods 21 4.1 Desktop Review 21 4.2 Habitat Definition 22 4.3 Vertebrate Fauna Field Survey 24 4.4 SRE Fauna Survey 44 4.5 Nomenclature 49 4.6 Data Analysis 49 4.7 Survey Limitations 50 4.8 Legislation and Policy Conformance 50 5.0 Results 53 5.1 Fauna Habitats 53 5.2 Desktop Review 56 5.3 Recorded Assemblage 59 5.4 Survey Adequacy 69 5.5 Species Accumulation 70 5.6 Faunal Assemblage Analysis 71 6.0 Conservation Significant Vertebrate Fauna 73 6.1 Mammals 73 6.2 Birds 79 6.3 Reptiles 80 6.4 Conservation Significant Fauna Likely to Occur but Not Recorded 81 7.0 Invertebrate Fauna 83 8.0 Conclusions 85 9.0 Glossary 87 Cube:Current:1290C (AREH Fauna):Documents:AREH Fauna Rev A.docx 5 Asian Renewable Energy Hub Level 2 Terrestrial Fauna and SRE Fauna Survey 10.0 References 89 Appendix 1 Desktop Review Results Appendix 2 Database Search Results Appendix 3 Regulation 17 Licence Appendix 4 Helix Molecular Solutions Report Appendix 5 Conservation Significance Framework Appendix 6 Conservation Significant Species Considered Unlikely to Occur Tables Table 3.1: Description and extent of land systems in the study area. 18 Table 3.2: Description and extent of Beard’s broad vegetation units in the study area (Source: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development). 18 Table 4.1: Ranking system used to assign the likelihood that a species would occur in the study area. 22 Table 4.2: Literature reviewed in relation to the study area. 23 Table 4.3: Weather conditions during the field survey (data from BOM, Mandora Station 004019). 24 Table 4.4: Details of trap site locations and sampling effort (trap-nights) per phase. 29 Table 4.5: Trapping site descriptions and photographs. 31 Table 4.6: Avifauna census times at each trapping site (minutes). 38 Table 4.7: Motion camera sites. 40 Table 4.8: Bat-call recording sites. 40 Table 4.9: Details of SM4 units deployed to record in the audible range. 42 Table 4.10: Summary of vertebrate fauna search effort. 42 Table 4.11: Summary of methods used to sample for short-range endemic invertebrate fauna. 44 Table 4.12: Search sites targeting potential SRE invertebrate fauna. 44 Table 4.13: Criteria used to determine SRE status. 48 Table 4.14: State and Commonwealth legislation, policy and guidelines of most relevance to this study. 50 Table 5.1: Fauna habitats of the study area and the survey sites at which they were sampled. 54 Table 5.2: Conservation significant fauna returned from the desktop review with their likelihood of occurrence. 57 Table 5.3: Overview of vertebrate fauna recorded from the study area. 59 Table 5.4: Non-volant mammals recorded during the survey. 61 Table 5.5: Bats recorded during the survey. 62 Table 5.6: Birds recorded within the study area. 64 6 Cube:Current:1290C (AREH Fauna):Documents:AREH Fauna Rev A.docx Asian Renewable Energy Hub Level 2 Terrestrial Fauna and SRE Fauna Survey Table 5.7: Reptiles recorded during the survey. 66 Table 5.8: Amphibians recorded during the survey. 68 Figures Figure 2.1: Location of the study area. 14 Figure 3.1: IBRA sub-regions and conservation reserves in proximity to the study area. 16 Figure 3.2: Land systems of the study area. 19 Figure 3.3: Beard’s vegetation associations for the study area. 20 Figure 4.1: Weather observations in the year preceding the survey (August 2016 – March 2018) compared to long-term (1913 – 2018) climatological averages (data from the Bureau of Meteorology Mandora Station 004019). 25 Figure 4.2: Overview of fauna sampling effort within the study area (see Figures 4.3 to 4.7 for more detail on each sampling method). 26 Figure 4.3: Location of fauna trapping sites within the study area. 28 Figure 4.4: Locations of systematic bird census sites. 39 Figure 4.5: Locations of automated recording units. 41 Figure 4.6: Location of search and habitat assessment sites. 43 Figure 4.7: Locations of potential SRE invertebrate fauna sampling sites. 45 Figure 5.1: Fauna habitats defined within the study area. 55 Figure 5.2: Species richness returned from database searches and other surveys in the region relative to the current study. 69 Figure 5.3: Rarefaction curve, actual species accumulation and estimated species richness (Chao1) for ground fauna species recorded at the 16 systematic trapping sites. 70 Figure 5.4: Rarefaction curve and estimated species richness (Chao1) for bird species recorded via dedicated bird census at the systematic sampling sites. 71 Figure 5.5: Dendrogram display of Bray-Curtis Similarity between systematic sites and the habitats that they sampled (ground fauna only). 72 Figure 6.1: Records of conservation significant vertebrate fauna from this study. 74 Plates Plate 4.1: AHFSRE01. 46 Plate 4.2: AHFSRE02. 46 Plate 4.3: AHFSRE03. 46 Plate 4.4: AHFSRE04. 46 Plate 4.5: AHFSRE05. 46 Plate 4.6: AHFSRE06. 46 Plate 4.7: AHFSRE07. 47 Plate 4.8: AHFSRE08. 47 Plate 4.9: AHFSRE09. 47 Plate 4.10: AHFSRE10. 47 Plate 5.1: Shrub and spinifex on sandplain. 53 Plate 5.2: Gravelly lateritic rises. 53 Plate 5.3: Inland sand dune. 53 Plate 5.4: Rock outcropping. 53 Cube:Current:1290C (AREH Fauna):Documents:AREH Fauna Rev A.docx 7 Asian Renewable Energy Hub Level 2 Terrestrial Fauna and SRE Fauna Survey Plate 5.5: Beach and foredunes. 53 Plate 5.6: Paleo-tidal coastal plains. 53 Plate 6.1: Typical Black-footed Rock-wallaby habitat within the study area. 76 Plate 6.2: Typical Black-footed Rock-wallaby habitat within the study area. 76 Plate 6.3: Black-footed Rock-wallaby shelter and scat piles within the study area. 76 Plate 6.4: Black-footed Rock-wallaby tracks within the study area. 76 Plate 6.5: Bilby burrow in Shrub and spinifex on sandplain habitat. 77 Plate 6.6: Bilby record from automatic camera. 77 Plate 6.7: Mulgara burrow within typical habitat. 78 Plate 6.8: Mulgara burrow. 78 Plate 6.9: Active Western Pebble-mound Mouse mound. 79 Plate 6.10: Lerista separanda specimen from the survey vouchered with the WA Museum. 80 8 Cube:Current:1290C (AREH Fauna):Documents:AREH Fauna Rev A.docx Asian Renewable Energy Hub Level 2 Terrestrial Fauna and SRE Fauna Survey 1.0 Executive Summary 1.1 Project Background NW Interconnected Power Pty Ltd is seeking to develop the Asian Renewable Energy Hub. The proposal is to construct and operate a large-scale wind and solar hybrid renewable energy project (hereafter ‘the project’) at a site approximately 220 km east of Port Hedland and 270 km southwest of Broome, in the northwest of Western Australia. The project will be constructed within a 660,686 ha development envelope (hereafter ‘the study area’). Biota was commissioned to conduct a Level 2 terrestrial fauna survey and targeted sampling for conservation significant fauna and short-range endemic (SRE) fauna. The first phase of the terrestrial fauna survey was carried out from 24th August – 5th September 2017. The second sampling phase of the survey was undertaken from 13th – 21st March 2018, following summer rainfall. All surveys were completed as far as practicable in accordance with relevant State and Commonwealth policy, with key policy and guidelines that were considered including: • Environmental Factor Guideline: Terrestrial Fauna (EPA 2016a); • Technical Guide - Terrestrial Fauna Surveys (EPA 2016b); and • Technical Guide - Sampling of Short Range Endemic Invertebrates (EPA 2016c). 1.2 Methods A total of 22 fauna trapping sites were installed across the study area, representatively sampling the range of habitat types present.
Recommended publications
  • Lake Pinaroo Ramsar Site
    Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site Disclaimer The Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW (DECC) has compiled the Ecological character description: Lake Pinaroo Ramsar site in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECC does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. © State of New South Wales and Department of Environment and Climate Change DECC is pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney PO Box A290, Sydney South 1232 Phone: 131555 (NSW only – publications and information requests) (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au DECC 2008/275 ISBN 978 1 74122 839 7 June 2008 Printed on environmentally sustainable paper Cover photos Inset upper: Lake Pinaroo in flood, 1976 (DECC) Aerial: Lake Pinaroo in flood, March 1976 (DECC) Inset lower left: Blue-billed duck (R. Kingsford) Inset lower middle: Red-necked avocet (C. Herbert) Inset lower right: Red-capped plover (C. Herbert) Summary An ecological character description has been defined as ‘the combination of the ecosystem components, processes, benefits and services that characterise a wetland at a given point in time’.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Diurnal Raptors and Airports
    Australian diurnal raptors and airports Photo: John Barkla, BirdLife Australia William Steele Australasian Raptor Association BirdLife Australia Australian Aviation Wildlife Hazard Group Forum Brisbane, 25 July 2013 So what is a raptor? Small to very large birds of prey. Diurnal, predatory or scavenging birds. Sharp, hooked bills and large powerful feet with talons. Order Falconiformes: 27 species on Australian list. Family Falconidae – falcons/ kestrels Family Accipitridae – eagles, hawks, kites, osprey Falcons and kestrels Brown Falcon Black Falcon Grey Falcon Nankeen Kestrel Australian Hobby Peregrine Falcon Falcons and Kestrels – conservation status Common Name EPBC Qld WA SA FFG Vic NSW Tas NT Nankeen Kestrel Brown Falcon Australian Hobby Grey Falcon NT RA Listed CR VUL VUL Black Falcon EN Peregrine Falcon RA Hawks and eagles ‐ Osprey Osprey Hawks and eagles – Endemic hawks Red Goshawk female Hawks and eagles – Sparrowhawks/ goshawks Brown Goshawk Photo: Rik Brown Hawks and eagles – Elanus kites Black‐shouldered Kite Letter‐winged Kite ~ 300 g Hover hunters Rodent specialists LWK can be crepuscular Hawks and eagles ‐ eagles Photo: Herald Sun. Hawks and eagles ‐ eagles Large ‐ • Wedge‐tailed Eagle (~ 4 kg) • Little Eagle (< 1 kg) • White‐bellied Sea‐Eagle (< 4 kg) • Gurney’s Eagle Scavengers of carrion, in addition to hunters Fortunately, mostly solitary although some multiple strikes on aircraft Hawks and eagles –large kites Black Kite Whistling Kite Brahminy Kite Frequently scavenge Large at ~ 600 to 800 g BK and WK flock and so high risk to aircraft Photo: Jill Holdsworth Identification Beruldsen, G (1995) Raptor Identification. Privately published by author, Kenmore Hills, Queensland, pp. 18‐19, 26‐27, 36‐37.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Canobolas Fauna Survey
    MOUNT CANOBOLAS FAUNA SURVEY 24TH – 29th MARCH 2019 1 Introduction Mount Canobolas State Conservation Area The Mount Canobolas State Conservation Area (SCA) Draft Plan of Management begins with the following vision for this reserve: Mount Canobolas State Conservation Area is a sentinel in the landscape. It is a park valued, understood and protected by the community for its uniqueness, biodiversity, visitor experiences, and for the spiritual and cultural connections between people and this special place, now and into the future (OEH 2018). This iconic place is an extinct volcano rising to an altitude of 1397m asl and more than 500m above the surrounding central tablelands landscape. It has great significance for the local Wiradjuri custodians. The ecological values of this place are shaped by its high altitude, volcanic origins, isolation from similar geological formations and the extensive clearing of the surrounding landscape leaving it as a relatively isolated remnant of native vegetation. The presence of sub-alpine communities is particularly noteworthy (OEH 2018). The SCA incorporates an area of 1672 ha. The vegetation communities of the Mt Canobolas SCA have been broadly described and mapped with the following communities defined: 1. Eucalyptus macrorhyncha – E. dives: shrubby open forest and woodland (26% of the SCA) a. E. macrorhyncha dominant in more exposed sites b. E. dives dominant in less exposed sites 2. E. pauciflora – E. dalrympleana: Grassy woodlands and tall open forests (51% of the SCA) a. E. pauciflora – E. canobolensis grassy woodlands b. E. dalrympleana – E. viminalis tall open forests 3. Outcrop low open woodland (E. canobolensis – E. petroc?) and / or shrubs 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Report No. 201601Rp1(F) AMBROSE
    Report No. 201601rp1(f) AMBROSE ECOLOGICALSERVICES PTY. LTD (ABN: 34 097 016 496. ACN: 097 016 496) CLIENT ngh Environmental Pty Ltd, PO Box 470, Bega NSW 2550 Contact: Mr Nick Graham-Higgs, Mobile: 0427 260 819 Email: [email protected] This report has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services described in the contract or agreement between Ambrose Ecological Services Pty Ltd (Ambecol) and the Client. The report relies upon data, surveys, measurements and results taken at or under the particular times and conditions specified herein. Any findings, conclusions or recommendations only apply to the aforementioned circumstances and no greater reliance should be assumed or drawn by the Client. The products and services referred to in the report should not be regarded as Ambecol’s endorsement of specific manufacturers, distributors or brands. Furthermore, the report has been prepared solely for use by the Client and Ambecol accepts no responsibility for its use by other parties. Author: Dr Stephen Ambrose Position: Director, Ambrose Ecological Services Pty Ltd Signed: Date: 9 September 2016 2______________________________________AMBROSE ECOLOGICAL SERVICES PTY LTD Contents Sections Page No. 1 Introduction 5 2 Proposed Development 5 2.1 Subject Site 5 2.2 Proposed Turbine Development 10 3 Bird Survey and Assessment Methods 10 3.1 Overview 10 3.3 Existing Records 10 3.3 Field Surveys 14 4 Results 15 4.1 Overview 15 4.2 Field Studies 15 4.3 Threatened Bird Taxa 17 4.4 Migratory Bird Taxa 18 4.5 Island Endemics 19 5 Potential Impacts 52 5.1 Introduction 52 5.2 Analysis of Turbine Options for Lord Howe Island 52 5.3 Bird Impacts of Wind Turbines in Other Studies 59 5.4 Impacts on Threatened Bird Species 61 5.5 Impacts on Nationally-listed Migratory Bird Species 62 6 Recommendations 62 7 References 64 Appendices A Flesh-footed Shearwater Report ( & Carlile, 2015) 67 B Directions of Bird Flights Over Subject Site, February and March 77 2016 C Bird Flights Over Each Survey Area on Subject Site, February and 81 March 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Oxley Creek Common Brisbane, Australia
    Birding Oxley Creek Common Brisbane, Australia Hugh Possingham and Mat Gilfedder – January 2011 [email protected] www.ecology.uq.edu.au 3379 9388 (h) Other photos, records and comments contributed by: Cathy Gilfedder, Mike Bennett, David Niland, Mark Roberts, Pete Kyne, Conrad Hoskin, Chris Sanderson, Angela Wardell-Johnson, Denis Mollison. This guide provides information about the birds, and how to bird on, Oxley Creek Common. This is a public park (access restricted to the yellow parts of the map, page 6). Over 185 species have been recorded on Oxley Creek Common in the last 83 years, making it one of the best birding spots in Brisbane. This guide is complimented by a full annotated list of the species seen in, or from, the Common. How to get there Oxley Creek Common is in the suburb of Rocklea and is well signposted from Sherwood Road. If approaching from the east (Ipswich Road side), pass the Rocklea Markets and turn left before the bridge crossing Oxley Creek. If approaching from the west (Sherwood side) turn right about 100 m after the bridge over Oxley Creek. The gate is always open. Amenities The main development at Oxley Creek Common is the Red Shed, which is beside the car park (plenty of space). The Red Shed has toilets (composting), water, covered seating, and BBQ facilities. The toilets close about 8pm and open very early. The paths are flat, wide and easy to walk or cycle. When to arrive The diversity of waterbirds is a feature of the Common and these can be good at any time of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Birds of Barrow Island
    A Guide to the Birds of Barrow Island Operated by Chevron Australia This document has been printed by a Sustainable Green Printer on stock that is certified carbon in joint venture with neutral and is Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC) mix certified, ensuring fibres are sourced from certified and well managed forests. The stock 55% recycled (30% pre consumer, 25% post- Cert no. L2/0011.2010 consumer) and has an ISO 14001 Environmental Certification. ISBN 978-0-9871120-1-9 Gorgon Project Osaka Gas | Tokyo Gas | Chubu Electric Power Chevron’s Policy on Working in Sensitive Areas Protecting the safety and health of people and the environment is a Chevron core value. About the Authors Therefore, we: • Strive to design our facilities and conduct our operations to avoid adverse impacts to human health and to operate in an environmentally sound, reliable and Dr Dorian Moro efficient manner. • Conduct our operations responsibly in all areas, including environments with sensitive Dorian Moro works for Chevron Australia as the Terrestrial Ecologist biological characteristics. in the Australasia Strategic Business Unit. His Bachelor of Science Chevron strives to avoid or reduce significant risks and impacts our projects and (Hons) studies at La Trobe University (Victoria), focused on small operations may pose to sensitive species, habitats and ecosystems. This means that we: mammal communities in coastal areas of Victoria. His PhD (University • Integrate biodiversity into our business decision-making and management through our of Western Australia)
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Band Size List Page 1
    Jun 00 Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme - Recommended Band Size List Page 1 Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme Recommended Band Size List - Birds of Australia and its Territories Number 24 - May 2000 This list contains all extant bird species which have been recorded for Australia and its Territories, including Antarctica, Norfolk Island, Christmas Island and Cocos and Keeling Islands, with their respective RAOU numbers and band sizes as recommended by the Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme. The list is in two parts: Part 1 is in taxonomic order, based on information in "The Taxonomy and Species of Birds of Australia and its Territories" (1994) by Leslie Christidis and Walter E. Boles, RAOU Monograph 2, RAOU, Melbourne, for non-passerines; and “The Directory of Australian Birds: Passerines” (1999) by R. Schodde and I.J. Mason, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, for passerines. Part 2 is in alphabetic order of common names. The lists include sub-species where these are listed on the Census of Australian Vertebrate Species (CAVS version 8.1, 1994). CHOOSING THE CORRECT BAND Selecting the appropriate band to use combines several factors, including the species to be banded, variability within the species, growth characteristics of the species, and band design. The following list recommends band sizes and metals based on reports from banders, compiled over the life of the ABBBS. For most species, the recommended sizes have been used on substantial numbers of birds. For some species, relatively few individuals have been banded and the size is listed with a question mark. In still other species, too few birds have been banded to justify a size recommendation and none is made.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Ecology, Status and Modelling of Waterbird Populations of the Coorong South Lagoon
    Review of the ecology, status and modelling of waterbird populations of the Coorong South Lagoon Thomas A. A. Prowse Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 20/12 www.goyderinstitute.org Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series ISSN: 1839-2725 The Goyder Institute for Water Research is a research alliance between the South Australian Government through the Department for Environment and Water, CSIRO, Flinders University, the University of Adelaide and the University of South Australia. The Institute facilitates governments, industries, and leading researchers to collaboratively identify, develop and adopt innovative solutions for complex water management challenges to ensure a sustainable future. This program is part of the Department for Environment and Water’s Healthy Coorong Healthy Basin Program, which is jointly funded by the Australian and South Australian Governments. Enquires should be addressed to: Goyder Institute for Water Research 209A Darling Building, North Terrace The University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005 tel: (08) 8313 5020 e-mail: [email protected] Citation Prowse TAA (2020) Review of the ecology, status and modelling of waterbird populations of the Coorong South Lagoon. Goyder Institute for Water Research Technical Report Series No. 20/12. © Crown in right of the State of South Australia, Department for Environment and Water, The University of Adelaide. Disclaimer This report has been prepared by The University of Adelaide (as the Goyder Institute for Water Research partner organisation) and contains independent scientific/technical advice to inform government decision- making. The independent findings and recommendations of this report are subject to separate and further consideration and decision-making processes and do not necessarily represent the views of the Australian Government or the South Australian Department for Environment and Water.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Vulnerability Assessments
    Assessing the vulnerability of native vertebrate fauna under climate change, to inform wetland and floodplain management of the River Murray in South Australia: Bird Vulnerability Assessments Attachment (2) to the Final Report June 2011 Citation: Gonzalez, D., Scott, A. & Miles, M. (2011) Bird vulnerability assessments- Attachment (2) to ‘Assessing the vulnerability of native vertebrate fauna under climate change to inform wetland and floodplain management of the River Murray in South Australia’. Report prepared for the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board. For further information please contact: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Phone Information Line (08) 8204 1910, or see SA White Pages for your local Department of Environment and Natural Resources office. Online information available at: http://www.environment.sa.gov.au Permissive Licence © State of South Australia through the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose subject to the conditions that you (1) attribute the Department as the copyright owner of this publication and that (2) you obtain the prior written consent of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources if you wish to modify the work or offer the publication for sale or otherwise use it or any part of it for a commercial purpose. Written requests for permission should be addressed to: Design and Production Manager Department of Environment and Natural Resources GPO Box 1047 Adelaide SA 5001 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources makes no representations and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fitness for any particular purpose of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Thick-Billed Warbler (Iduna Aedon) at Gambell, Alaska: First Record for North America Gary H
    NOTES THICK-BILLED WARBLER (IDUNA AEDON) AT GAMBELL, ALASKA: FIRST RECORD FOR NORTH AMERICA GARY H. ROSENBERG, 8101 North Wheatfield Dr., Tucson, Arizona 85741; [email protected] PAUL E. LEHMAN, 11192 Portobelo Dr., San Diego, California 92124; [email protected] AARON J. LANG, 40208 Alpenglow Circle, Homer, Alaska 99603; [email protected] VICTOR AND RUBEN STOLL, 899 Miller Rd., Centerville, Tennessee 37033; [email protected] In the evening on 8 September 2017, in the “far boneyard” at Gambell, St. Law- rence Island, Alaska (63.78° N, 171.74° W), Victor and Ruben Stoll flushed a pas- serine they could not immediately identify. The “boneyards” are large pits excavated by the resident Yupik Natives seeking buried ivory and artifacts, a result of several thousand years of sea-mammal hunting from this island’s Northwest Cape. Working these pits turns the soil, which has resulted in the growth of relatively lush vegetation consisting of two species of Artemisia, known locally as “wormwood.” The combina- tion of lush vegetation (reaching 0.5–1 m in height) and deep depressions that offer protection from the wind is attractive to migrant and vagrant landbirds in the otherwise flat, gravelly landscape. Soon thereafter, we, along with Greg Scyphers, Monte Taylor, and other birders then at Gambell, converged at the far boneyard in search of the bird. It was soon relocated and seen on the ground briefly by Lang, who suggested it was a Thick-billed Warbler (Iduna aedon), a bird he was familiar with from southeastern Asia and a species not previously recorded in Alaska or North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny and Phylogeography of Reed Warblers and Allies (Aves: Acrocephalidae)
    Dissertation submitted to the Combined Faculties for the Natural Sciences and for Mathematics of the Ruperto-Carola University of Heidelberg, Germany for the degree of Doctor of Natural Sciences presented by Tayebeh Arbabi Born in Mashhad, Iran Oral examination: 26 June 2014 Molecular Phylogeny and Phylogeography of Reed Warblers and Allies (Aves: Acrocephalidae) Referees: Prof. Dr. Michael Wink Prof. Dr. Marcus Koch i Table of contents Zusammenfassung..................................................................................................................... v Summary .................................................................................................................................. vi Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................... vii Publications ........................................................................................................................... viii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 General introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Avian taxonomy ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Phylogeny and phylogeography ................................................................................. 2 1.1.3 Molecular markers ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]