DOCSLIB.ORG

Power Reactors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Power Reactors NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS Dr. BC Choudhary Professor, Applied Science Department, NITTTR, Chandigarh-160019. Nuclear Reactors Ever since, the world’s first nuclear reactor by Fermi & coworkers in USA, 1942 A variety of nuclear reactors have been built, primarily to meet increasing demand of energy. Although, nuclear reactors are highly complex installations and great care has to be exercised in designing, they work on a very simple principle; Nuclear Fission . The energy released in the process of fission is dissipated into the surrounding environment as heat; . The heat generated in fission is removed by circulating a fluid, called ‘coolant’ around the fuel; . This heat is subsequently used to generate high pressure and high temperature steam; . The steam is fed to a turbine generator system to produce electricity. Reactor Classification Reactors have been built for a wide range of uses, from power generation to testing new reactor components. Design specifications vary widely depending upon the purpose for which the reactor is to be used. One can classify reactors in different ways and some of the criteria used for classification are: . Mean energy of neutrons causing the fission; . Material used in a reactor for fuel, moderator or coolant; . Geometrical structure; and . Purpose for which a reactor is meant. A. Mean Energy of Neutrons causing Fission Classified broadly into Three Types: • Fast: Most of the fissions are induced by neutrons having energies of the order of few hundred keV, or in some special type as low as 10 keV. • Intermediate: Mean energy of neutrons in the range 10-100eV. Intermediate reactors, sometimes also referred to as resonance reactors. • Thermal: Most of the fissions are induced by neutrons of energy around 0.025 eV. Extensively built for power generation and also for research purposes. B. Reactors according to the material used Classified according to the materials used for fuel, moderator or coolant and their physical state, Explicitly mention it by name along with the purpose it serves. For Example: . A fission reactor in which graphite is used as moderator, carbon dioxide (a gas) as coolant and natural uranium as fuel is referred to as the ‘Graphite moderated - gas cooled - natural uranium fueled reactor’. Reactors with ordinary water both as moderator and coolant with enriched uranium as fuel are referred to as ‘Light water moderated and cooled, enriched uranium reactors’ or simply ‘Light water reactors (LWR)’ Continued… Similarly one can have . ‘Heavy water reactor’(HWR, PHWR), . ‘Gas cooled heavy water moderated reactor’ . ‘Light water cooled heavy water moderated reactors’ C: Reactors by Structure From the point of view of their structure, thermal reactors can be further classified as . Homogeneous : Fuel and the moderator are in the same physical state or intimately mixed . Heterogeneous : Fuel is in the from of rods or plates which are regularly dispersed in the moderator, i.e. fuel and moderator are geometrically separated. Most of the present day reactors are of Heterogeneous type. D. Reactors According to Purpose Reactors can also be classified according to the purpose for which they are meant into the following categories: . Power generation . Conversion of one material into another Reactors built for basic research in various branches of science for testing new reactor designs or new reactor components, for producing radio-isotopes and for medical purpose (neutron therapy) are referred to as “Research reactors” . Cirus, Apsara & Purnima at Trombay are examples of research reactors. Usually a single research reactor simultaneously serves many of these purpose. Other Classification Features Reactors designed to convert a fertile isotope (232Th or 238U) into a fissile isotope (233U or 239Pu) “Convertors”. If the amount of newly produced fissile isotope is more than what is burnt in maintaining the chain reaction, ‘Breeders’. Reactors built to produce power are referred to as ‘Power reactors’. Today most of nuclear power comes from ‘Thermal reactors’ based on the fission of 235U. “Fast breeders” are expected to play an increasingly important role in future- one expects that they will provide a virtually unlimited source of energy. POWER REACTORS Power Reactors Thermal Fast Graphite moderated Light water Heavy water Thermal Breeders Liquid metal Gas cooled gas cooled Reactors Reactors fast breeder fast breeder (GCR) (LWR) (PHWR) (LMFBR) (GCFB) Pressurised Boiling water Molten salt Light water water reactors reactors breeder reactors breeder reactors (PWR) (BWR) (MSBR) (LWBR) Reactor Schematics All nuclear reactors consist of following basic components: . Reactor core, . Reflector, . Reactor vessel, . Radiation shield, . Structural materials, . Coolant loops and heat exchangers In fast reactors, a blanket is also placed between the core and the reflector. Core : The central region of a reactor where fission takes place, resulting in the release of energy • In fast reactors it contains a nuclear fuel, a coolant, control rods and structural materials. • In thermal reactors a moderator is also present. Usually fuel is in the form of a ceramic, i.e. either an oxide or a carbide or a nitride. In some cases, uranium in the metallic form is also used as fuel – fuel should have high melting point, high thermal conductivity, high resistance to radiation damage and chemically inert Fuel rods are covered with some protective material known as ‘Cladding or Canning’- should be highly resistive to corrosion, a poor neutron absorber, high melting point and good mechanical strength Zirconium, steel, aluminum, magnesium, nickel and some other similar materials have been proposed for this purpose. Zirconium is the best and one generally uses Zirconium alloy, known as Zircalloy-2(ZR-2), in thermal power reactors. In fast reactors, and sometimes in light water reactors, stainless steel is used. Aluminium is used mainly in research reactors A single cladded unit of fuel is known as the ‘fuel element’. Several such fuel elements when put together constitute a “fuel assembly or a fuel bundle”. Large number of such fuel assemblies are arranged in the form of a regular lattice. The lattice is usually square or hexagonal in the form Arrangement of square/hexagonal reactor lattice in a core. To remove fission heat from the core, necessary to circulate a fluid (liquid or gas) through the reactor called coolant- should have high thermal capacity, low neutron absorption, good radiation & thermal stability and compatible with fuel & clad. To slow down neutrons born in fission, a moderator is also present in the core of a thermal reactor - material of low mass number, large scattering cross- section and small absorption cross-section. Commonly used moderators are heavy water, light water and graphite. Fuel-coolant-moderator arrangement Lithium & Beryllium used in some in reactor core molten salt breeder reactors. In fast reactors, where no moderator is present, the same materials is used as coolant. To ensure safe operation of a reactor at desired power level, to start up and to shut down a reactor, fuel burn up and temperature effects, provision has to be made in the reactor core to control the multiplication factor. Achieved by having control rods (or plates) in the core - made of some highly neutron absorbing materials such as Boron, Cadmium, Hafnium, Gadolinium or their alloys. Control rods may sub-grouped as shim rods, regulating rods or safety rods, depending upon their function. To support fuel elements, for making coolant channels and for various other purposes, it is necessary to use some structural materials inside the core – similar properties as those of clad; stainless steel or Zircalloys. Blanket . Fast reactors are generally compact, hence a significant fraction of neutrons in the core leaks out of the system. To reduce this leakage and also to make proper use of the leaking neutrons, core in these reactors is surrounded by a region of fertile material (232Th or 238U) referred to as the ‘blanket’. Also serves as an additional neutron reflector as well as a shield. The neutrons absorbed in the blanket eventually leads to the production of fissile nuclei ; 233U or 239Pu. Reflector A region of non-fissionable material put next to the core (or blanket if present) to return back the neutron escaping from the core In fast reactors the material chosen is one of high mass number and low absorption cross-section so that the mean energy of neutrons returned back from this region is not much different from that of neutrons entering it. Ni, Cu and Mo are used as reflectors. In thermal reactors any good moderating material can be used as reflector. In LWRs and PHWRs, H2O and D2O are themselves used as reflectors. Graphite, Be or BeO may be used in gas cooled reactors. Reactor Vessel . The whole assembly is placed inside a vessel, called “Pressure or Reactor vessel” or “Calendria” Usually stainless steel is used to make the reactor vessel. For PWRs, which are designed to operate at high pressure, the wall of the pressure vessel is several inches thick. In BWR, the pressure is nearly one-half of that in a PWR so that in this case pressure vessel is thinner. Shielding . To protect the scientists and other personnel working around the reactor as well as the equipment placed around it from radiations emanating from the reactor core, the reactor vessel is encased inside thick concrete walls. • In some cases alternate layers of heavy and light elements such as concrete and polyethylene or concrete and water are also used. Further to reduce the heating effect of nuclear radiations and hence to prevent radiation damage of the pressure vessel a ‘thermal shield’ usually made of stainless steel, is placed next to the reflector. Reactor Building The entire structure, is placed inside a reactor building. It is air tight and is maintained at a pressure slightly lower than the atmospheric pressure so that no air leaks out of the building, except through the ventilation channels.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fuel Geometry Options for a Moderated Low-Enriched Uranium Kilowatt-Class Space Nuclear Reactor T ⁎ Leonardo De Holanda Mencarinia,B,Jeffrey C
    Nuclear Engineering and Design 340 (2018) 122–132 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Nuclear Engineering and Design journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/nucengdes Fuel geometry options for a moderated low-enriched uranium kilowatt-class space nuclear reactor T ⁎ Leonardo de Holanda Mencarinia,b,Jeffrey C. Kinga, a Nuclear Science and Engineering Program, Colorado School of Mines (CSM), 1500 Illinois St, Hill Hall, 80401 Golden, CO, USA b Subdivisão de Dados Nucleares - Instituto de Estudos Avançados (IEAv), Trevo Coronel Aviador José Alberto Albano do Amarante, n 1, 12228-001 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil ABSTRACT A LEU-fueled space reactor would avoid the security concerns inherent with Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) fuel and could be attractive to signatory countries of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) or commercial interests. The HEU-fueled Kilowatt Reactor Using Stirling Technology (KRUSTY) serves as a basis for a similar reactor fueled with LEU fuel. Based on MCNP6™ neutronics performance estimates, the size of a 5 kWe reactor fueled with 19.75 wt% enriched uranium-10 wt% molybdenum alloy fuel is adjusted to match the excess reactivity of KRUSTY. Then, zirconium hydride moderator is added to the core in four different configurations (a homogeneous fuel/moderator mixture and spherical, disc, and helical fuel geometries) to reduce the mass of uranium required to produce the same excess reactivity, decreasing the size of the reactor. The lowest mass reactor with a given moderator represents a balance between the reflector thickness and core diameter needed to maintain the multiplication factor equal to 1.035, with a H/D ratio of 1.81.
    [Show full text]
  • Beryllium – a Unique Material in Nuclear Applications
    INEEL/CON-04-01869 PREPRINT Beryllium – A Unique Material In Nuclear Applications T. A. Tomberlin November 15, 2004 36th International SAMPE Technical Conference This is a preprint of a paper intended for publication in a journal or proceedings. Since changes may be made before publication, this preprint should not be cited or reproduced without permission of the author. This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for any third party's use, or the results of such use, of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned rights. The views expressed in this paper are not necessarily those of the U.S. Government or the sponsoring agency. BERYLLIUM – A UNIQUE MATERIAL IN NUCLEAR APPLICATIONS T. A. Tomberlin Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory P.O. Box 1625 2525 North Fremont Ave. Idaho Falls, ID 83415 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Beryllium, due to its unique combination of structural, chemical, atomic number, and neutron absorption cross section characteristics, has been used successfully as a neutron reflector for three generations of nuclear test reactors at the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL). The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), the largest test reactor in the world, has utilized five successive beryllium neutron reflectors and is scheduled for continued operation with a sixth beryllium reflector.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons Technology 101 for Policy Wonks Bruce T
    NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY FOR POLICY WONKS NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 101 FOR POLICY WONKS BRUCE T. GOODWIN BRUCE T. GOODWIN BRUCE T. Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory August 2021 NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 101 FOR POLICY WONKS BRUCE T. GOODWIN Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory August 2021 NUCLEAR WEAPONS TECHNOLOGY 101 FOR POLICY WONKS | 1 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in part under Contract W-7405-Eng-48 and in part under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. ISBN-978-1-952565-11-3 LCCN-2021907474 LLNL-MI-823628 TID-61681 2 | BRUCE T. GOODWIN Table of Contents About the Author. 2 Introduction . .3 The Revolution in Physics That Led to the Bomb . 4 The Nuclear Arms Race Begins. 6 Fission and Fusion are "Natural" Processes . 7 The Basics of the Operation of Nuclear Explosives. 8 The Atom . .9 Isotopes . .9 Half-life . 10 Fission . 10 Chain Reaction . 11 Critical Mass . 11 Fusion . 14 Types of Nuclear Weapons . 16 Finally, How Nuclear Weapons Work . 19 Fission Explosives . 19 Fusion Explosives . 22 Staged Thermonuclear Explosives: the H-bomb . 23 The Modern, Miniature Hydrogen Bomb . 25 Intrinsically Safe Nuclear Weapons . 32 Underground Testing . 35 The End of Nuclear Testing and the Advent of Science-Based Stockpile Stewardship . 39 Stockpile Stewardship Today . 41 Appendix 1: The Nuclear Weapons Complex .
    [Show full text]
  • Reactor Physics Analysis of Air-Cooled Nuclear System
    REACTOR PHYSICS ANALYSIS OF AIR-COOLED NUCLEAR SYSTEM A Thesis by HANNIEL JOUVAIN HONANG Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Pavel V. Tsvetkov Committee Members, Marc Holtzapple Sean McDeavitt Head of Department, Yassin Hassan May 2016 Major Subject: Nuclear Engineering Copyright 2016 Hanniel Jouvain Honang ABSTRACT The design of SACRé (Small Air-Cooled Reactor) fixated on evaluations of air as a potential coolant. The assessment offered in this thesis focused on reactor physic analyses, and materials review and incorporation in a system defined by a highly corrosive environment. The oxidizing nature of air at high-temperature warrants the need to examine and compare materials for their oxidation temperature, their melting and boiling temperature, and their thermal conductivity. Material choices for the fuel, the cladding, the system’s casing/structural material and the reflector were evaluated in this study. Survey of materials and literature lead to the selection of six different cladding materials which are FeCrAl, APMT, Inconel 718 and stainless steel of type 304, 316 and 310. A review of their thermal properties, for a high oxidation temperature and melting temperature and the exhibition of a hard neutron spectrum lead to the selection of APMT steel material. This material was not only be selected as the fuel cladding but also as a casing for reflector and shielding materials. The design of this 600 MWth system was investigated considering reflector materials for fast spectrum. Lead-based reflectors (lead bismuth eutectic, lead oxide and pure lead), magnesium-based reflectors (magnesium oxide and magnesium aluminum oxide), and aluminum oxide reflectors were evaluated in this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hansen Letter
    The Hansen Letter Introduction by Howard Morland, November 2003: This seven-thousand-word letter by Chuck Hansen, dated August 27, 1979, delivered a coup de grace to the government=s case for censorship of my Progressive magazine article on the H- bomb. It is a bit odd that Senator Charles Percy of Illinois was the intended recipient of the letter. He was never involved in The Progressive case, nor was he Chuck Hansen=s senator. He did not, apparently, request such a communication, and after receiving it he did not subsequently play a role in The Progressive case. However, copies of the letter immediately began to circulate among all persons concerned with the case. Hansen=s reason for writing the letter is not entirely clear, except as a vehicle for outlining his theory about the H-bomb secret. As he states in the letter, AThese... are some of the ideas I believe are presented in the Morland article (I have not seen the article).@ The defense attorneys in The Progressive case regarded him as an ally, of sorts, but wanted no part of his call for the punishment of Edward Teller, Theodore Taylor, and George Rathjens for security violations. Nonetheless, the defense was preparing to argue in court that the widespread distribution of this Hansen letter should moot The Progressive case. The letter clearly outlines the three H-bomb principles at issue in the case: separation of stages, compression, and radiation coupling. However it introduces two obvious technical flaws. Hansen describes the use of two primaries, or fission triggers, one at either end of the fusion secondary, which would explode simultaneously to compress the fusion secondary between them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of the Presence Or Absence of a Neutron Reflector on the Critical Mass of Uranium
    Archive of SID The influence of the presence or absence of a neutron reflector on the critical mass of uranium Maryam Noorani Department of physics, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran [email protected] Farhad Zolfagharpour Department of physics, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran [email protected] Sara Azimkhani Department of physics, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran [email protected] Abstract To increase productivity and improve the neutron economy in the reactor, neutron reflection is used. This reflectors cause lack of neutron leakage and reactor fuel can reach critical mass faster. Various materials such as beryllium, neutron, carbon, water, lead and so on could satisfy this property. In this paper, by using the MCNP code, critical mass of uranium in the term of percent of enrichment for different reflectors is obtained. The results show beryllium, carbon and deuterium are an excellent choice for this purpose. Also increasing the thickness of the neutron reflector causes an increase in neutron multiplication factor. Keywords: Neutron reflector, Critical mass, Uranium. www.SID.ir Archive of SID Introduction Initial calculations of critical mass or the amount of fissile material needed to continue nuclear fission refers to Heisenberg works on it (Logan, 1995). Heisenberg expresses that by using fissile material and calculating the critical mass can manufacture nuclear weapon (Serber, 1992) but calculations of nuclear reactors for energy production in 1950s was pursued with greater intensity. Nowadays the calculation of critical mass takes place by computing codes and simulation and codes for neutron transport (Kastanya, 2015). For a nuclear reactor that is working with a constant potential over the time, it is needed that neutron chain reaction takes place inside with the multiplication factor K=1, it means that number of neutrons produced by fission is equal to the total number of neutrons absorbed and leaked out of the reactor core (Krane, 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Fission Target Design and Integration of Neutron Converter for Eurisol-Ds Project J
    FISSION TARGET DESIGN AND INTEGRATION OF NEUTRON CONVERTER FOR EURISOL-DS PROJECT J. Bermudez, O. Alyakrinskiy, M. Barbui, L.B. Tecchio Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro I.N.F.N. Viale dell'Università 2, 35020 Legnaro (PADOVA) ITALY. F. Negoita, L. Serbina, E. Udup “Horia Hulubei” - National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering (IFIN-HH) Str. Atomistilor 407, P.O. Box MG-6, 077125 Bucharest-Magurele, Romania Abstract A study of a new fission target for EURISOL-DS is presented with a detailed description of the target. Calculations of several configurations were done using Monte Carlo code FLUKA aimed to obtaining 1015 fissions/s on single target. In Eurisol, neutrons inducing the fission reactions are produced by a proton beam 1GeV- 4mA interacting with a mercury converter. The target configuration was customized to gain fission yield from the large amount of low energy neutrons produced by the Hg converter. To this purpose, the fissile material is composed by discs of 238- Uranium carbide enriched with 15 g of 235-U. Studies of several geometries were done in order to define the shape and composition of uranium target, taking into account the mechanical and space constraints. Furthermore different configurations of reflector and moderators materials were considered to increase the thermal neutrons confined around the target and so enhance the performance of the system. The final configuration consists in six modular target containers inclined respect to the vertical, containing the fission targets, ion sources with RIB extraction and steering elements, cryopanels and devices for handling. The cross sections of the modules are rectangular with 10 mm coating of water for cooling.
    [Show full text]
  • Burnup Analysis for HTR-10 Reactor Core Loaded with Uranium and Thorium Oxide
    Nuclear Engineering and Technology 52 (2020) 674e680 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Nuclear Engineering and Technology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/net Original Article Burnup analysis for HTR-10 reactor core loaded with uranium and thorium oxide * ** Mohamed A. Alzamly a, , Moustafa Aziz a, , Alya A. Badawi b, Hanaa Abou Gabal b, Abdel Rraouf A. Gadallah a a Egyptian Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority (ENRRA), Egypt b Department of Nuclear and Radiation Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alexandria, Egypt article info abstract Article history: We used MCNP6 computer code to model HTR-10 core reactor. We used two types of fuel; UO2 and Received 17 April 2019 (ThþPu)O2 mixture. We determined the critical height at which the reactor approached criticality in both Received in revised form two cases. The neutronic and burnup parameters were investigated. The results indicated that the core 13 September 2019 fueled with mixed (ThþPu)O , achieved about 24% higher fuel cycle length than the UO case. It also Accepted 21 September 2019 2 2 enhanced safeguard security by burning Pu isotopes. The results were compared with previously pub- Available online 25 September 2019 lished papers and good agreements were found. © 2019 Korean Nuclear Society, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC. This is an open access article under the Keywords: Pebble-bed CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). HTR-10 Burnup Thorium based fuel 1. Introduction ceramic [2]. The coolant outlet temperature in HTR-10 is much higher than High Temperature Reactors (HTRs) and Very High Temperature PWRs (700 Ce950 C compared to 300 C) [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Module 6: Neutron Diffusion Dr. John H. Bickel
    Fundamentals of Nuclear Engineering Module 6: Neutron Diffusion Dr. John H. Bickel 1 2 Objectives: 1. Understand how Neutron Diffusion explains reactor neutron flux distribution 2. Understand origin, limitations of Neutron Diffusion from: • Boltzmann Transport Equation, • Ficke’s Law 3. Solution of One-Group Neutron Diffusion Equation for: • Cubical, • Cylindrical geometries (via separation of variables technique) 4. Identify Eigenvalues of Neutron Diffusion Equation (Buckling, Diffusion Length) related to physical properties 5. Understand refinements from Multi-Group Diffusion Model applied to Reflectors, flux depression near strong neutron absorbers, and sources 3 Boltzmann’s Transport Equation • Originates from Statistical Mechanics • Used to understand kinetic theory of gasses • Full equation expressed as integral-differential equation • In simplest terms it is a conservation equation d r N(r,v,t)d 3r = S(r,t)d 3r − N(r,v,t)vΣ (r,v,t)d 3r − J (r,v,t) • nrdA ∫ ∫ ∫∫c dt V V V 4 Boltzmann’s Transport Equation • First simplification: Apply Divergence Theorem r r r ∫ J (r,v,t) • nrdA = ∫∇ • J (r,v,t)d 3r V • Remove volume integration: d r r N(r,v,t) = S(r,t) − N(r,v,t)vΣ (r,v,t) − ∇ • J (r,v,t) dt c • Divergence of Local Neutron Current is simplified by making “Diffusion Approximation” • Alternate solution approach is via Monte Carlo Method • Diffusion Approximation is based upon Fick’s Law 5 Diffusion Approximation Assumes: • Uniform relatively infinite medium thus: Σc(r) ~ Σc • No strong “point” neutron sources in medium • Scattering
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of the Beryllium Reflector in the Safari-1 Research Reactor
    B12 THE STATUS OF THE BERYLLIUM REFLECTOR IN THE SAFARI-1 RESEARCH REACTOR M. BELAL South African Nuclear Energy Corporation (Necsa), Radiation and Reactor Theory Section, Pretoria, South Africa W.J. STYRDOM South African Nuclear Energy Corporation (Necsa), SAFARI-1 research reactor, Pretoria, South Africa Abstract The aspects that were considered in the evaluation of the status of the beryllium reflector elements and the justification for the replacement are safety and operational related. The safety considerations were carefully examined against what is stated in the safety requirements document IAEA NR-S-4, and the following safety related functions were deduced as where the beryllium elements are deemed to be a contributor to their fulfillment, the maintenance of a constant core configuration, and the structural integrity of the core. These safety requirements are essential to the fulfillment of the shutdown and cooling safety functions. Furthermore on the topic of safety considerations is the accumulation of the highly radioactive Tritium that may leak through a cracked or broken element and threatens workers and public health. Operational considerations are the reflection efficiency of the elements, the impact on the core performance and on the in-core fuel management, the handling of the embrittled elements, the operational experience, and the replacement criteria by other research reactors. The three former considerations could be realized as related neutronics contributors to the operational performance and the later related to the safety considerations stated above. Against the above background, this paper presents an overview of the Beryllium reflector replacement evaluation with regard to fast neutron impact on ductility, swelling, bowing and subsequent operational difficulties.
    [Show full text]
  • Proton Irradiation Effects on Beryllium - a Macroscopic Assessment
    BNL-112576-2016-JA Proton Irradiation Effects on Beryllium - A Macroscopic Assessment Nikolaos Simos, M. Elbakhshwan, Z. Zhong and F. Camino Submitted to JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS August 2016 Nuclear Sciences & Technology Department Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP) (SC-26) Notice: This manuscript has been authored by employees of Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No.DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The publisher by accepting the manuscript for publication acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Terrorism
    Nuclear terrorism Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen Independent consultant member of the Nuclear Consulting Group July 2019 [email protected] Note In this document the references are coded by Q-numbers (e.g. Q6). Each reference has a unique number in this coding system, which is consistently used throughout all publications by the author. In the list at the back of the document the references are sorted by Q-number. The resulting sequence is not necessarily the same order in which the references appear in the text. m23terrorism20190719 1 Contents 1 Nuclear ex[losives Uranium Enrichment of uranium Uranium-233 Plutonium Neptunium-237 Americium 2 Nuclear terrorism Threats MOX fuel Safeguards of plutonium Safeguards of HEU and uranium-233 Safeguards of neptunium and americium Dirty bomb 3 Illicit trafficking and theft Failing nuclear supervision Uncontrollable transports of nuclear materials Illegal dumping at sea 4 Nuclear security and reprocessing of spent fuel Separation of fissile materials Roots of reprocessing Security issues of the breeder and P&T cycles Benefits of reprocessing Keep spent fuel elements intact 5 Vulnerability of nuclear installations Mass casualty attacks Armed conflicts Natural disasters m23terrorism20190719 2 1 Nuclear explosives Uranium An atomic bomb can be made from materials containing sufficient fissile nuclides to sustain a divergent fission chain reaction. Uranium as found in nature contains 0.7% uranium-235, the only fissile nuclide occurring in nature. The remaining 99.3% consists of U-238 and traces of U-234, both nuclides are not fissile. Natural uranium is not suitable for bombs, it has to be enriched in U-235 to make a nuclear explosion possible.
    [Show full text]