DOCSLIB.ORG

JAFCO Investment (Hong Kong) Ltd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Venture Capital: Funding Alternative for New Enterprises Presentation By Vincent Chan Director & Executive Vice President JAFCO Investment (Hong Kong) Ltd. Rom 201B, Level, 2, Hong Kong Convention & Exhibition Centre 11:15am-12:30pm November 29, 2001 11 ContentContent 1. Definition 2. Nature of Venture Capital 3. Source of Funding 4. Revenue Model 5. Stages of Investment 6. Geographical Preference 7. Industry Preference 8. Investment Process 9. Past Development 10. Competition 11. VC looking for in return 12. Classic Cases 13. Points to Take Home 14. General Information 15. About JAFCO 12 1.1. Definition:Definition: WhatWhat isis VentureVenture CapitalCapital ¾ U.S. – >30 years in existence ¾ Fairly new term in Asia (until the last 2-3 years) ¾ Earliest venture capital firm in Asia began in 1963 in Japan ¾ Refers to investments in young, rapidly growing companies (particularly high-tech related) in the U.S. ¾ Wider meaning in Asia ------- generally refers to equity investments in growing, unlisted companies. ¾ Private Equity ¾ Direct Investments ¾ Serves as an intermediary between investors looking for high returns and entrepreneurs in need of capital 13 2.2. NatureNature ofof VentureVenture CapitalCapital ¾ VS Debt Financing ¾ VS Public Market ¾ Objective: generation of long term capital gains ¾ Horizon: 2-7 years ¾ Liquidity: low ¾ Risk: High ¾ Instruments: shares, convertible bonds, options, warrants ¾ Critical factor(s): Management team and market potential, rather than collateral ¾ Impact on Profit, Balance Sheet 14 3.3. WhereWhere doesdoes thethe moneymoney comescomes from?from? ¾ Fund investors: ¾ Insurance companies ¾ Pension funds ¾ University endowment funds ¾ Family trusts ¾ Government Treasury / Agencies ¾ Listed corporations / Private companies ¾ Wealthy high net worth individuals (>US$1 million) 15 4.4. RevenueRevenue ModelModel ofof VentureVenture CapitalistCapitalist ¾ Formation of the Fund : closed-end, structure: L.P./L.L.C. ¾ The Appointment of the Investment Manager ¾ Remuneration: ◈ Management Fees ◈ Carried Interests – hurdle rate ¾ No e-commerce for us! 16 5.5. StagesStages ofof InvestmentInvestment ¾ Stage One: Seed / Angel Round ¾ Stage Two: Start-up / Early stage ¾ Stage Three: Expansion / Development ¾ Stage Four: Mezzanine / Bridge ¾ Stage Five: Buyout / Buyin ¾ Stage Six: Turnaround / Restructuring ¾ Stage Seven: Others (pre-IPO, Privatization, straight punt) 17 6.6. GeographicalGeographical PreferencePreference ◈ China ◈ Thailand ◈ India ◈ Hong Kong ◈ Malaysia ◈ Sri Lanka ◈ Taiwan ◈ Singapore ◈ Australia/New Zealand ◈ South Korea ◈ Indonesia ◈ Israel ◈ Japan ◈ Philippines Forbidden Land ◈ Myanmar ◈ Brunei ◈ Vietnam ◈ Pakistan ◈ Laos ◈ North Korea ◈ Cambodia 18 7.7. IndustryIndustry PreferencePreference // ClassificationsClassifications ◈ Telecom ◈ Construction/Mining ◈ Media ◈ Agriculture/Fisheries ◈ IT ◈ Infrastructure/ Transportation ◈ Leisure/Entertainment ◈ Financial Services ◈ Electronics ◈ BioTech/Life Sciences ◈ Travel/Hospitality ◈ Real Estates ◈ Manufacturing/ Consumer Products 19 8.8. InvestmentInvestment ProcessProcess ·¾ Sourcing/Marketing ¾ Exits: ◈ IPOs ◈ Sale back ◈ Trade sale to Strategic investors ·¾ Initial evaluation & terms ◈ Put Option ·¾ Due diligence ·¾ Monitoring ◈ viable business plan ◈ board seat ◈ proprietary technology ◈ financial performance ◈ enforceable legal structure ◈ accounting/financial integrity ·¾ Documentation/Completion/Funding ◈ legal structure ◈ valuation ·¾ Final negotiation/term sheet ◈ Shareholders’ Agreement ◈ Subscription Agreement 110 9.9. AsianAsian DirectDirect InvestmentsInvestments Development:Development: PastPast ¾ Excessive valuations ¾ Plenty of capital available ¾ Weak deal flow but aggressive competition ¾ Tightly - controlled enterprises → family business → allow only passive investments ¾ Limited Government support for foreign investors → legal reforms → → corporate governance (transparency) ¾ Risks associated with currency, political stability and credit 111 9a.9a. AsianAsian DirectDirect InvestmentsInvestments Development:PastDevelopment:Past (cond’t) Statistics: capital under Management Country % change % change As ian Venture Capital Pool 1991-1999 1997 1998 1999 Australia 2,721 3,062 12.5% 3,616 18.1% US$million Hong Kong/china 10,670 15,442 44.7% 22,288 44.3% 80,000 India 1,016 1,053 3.6% 1,826 73.4% 69,132 Indonesia 426 328 -23.0% 333 1.5% 70,000 Japan 7,722 12,513 62.0% 21,729 73.7% 60,000 Korea 1,857 2,995 61.3% 4,986 66.5% Malaysia 45,785 406 460 13.3% 667 45.0% 50,000 Myanmar 113 83 -26.5% 36 -56.6% 40,000 33,791 New Zealand 110 186 69.1% 413 122.0% 30,951 33,433 32,136 26,222 Pakistan 6 15 150.0% 57 280.0% 30,000 21,925 23,431 Philippines 169 224 32.5% 292 30.4% 20,000 Singapore 4,468 5,258 17.7% 7,791 48.2% Sri Lanka 71 68 -4.2% 68 0.0% 10,000 Taiwan 1,913 3,598 85.4% 4,447 23.6% - Thailand 177 242 36.7% 265 9.5% 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Vietnam 292 258 -11.6% 318 23.3% Total 32,137 45,785 42.5% 69,132 51.0% Source: AVCJ 2001 Directory 112 9b.9b. FundFund RaisingRaising ScoreboardScoreboard Funds closed from January to September 2001 US$M 8,000 7,000 $6,520 6,000 5,000 $4,184 4,000 43 3,000 Funds $2,006 $2,178 33 2,000 Funds 2000 16 1,000 17 2001 Funds Funds Initial Close Final Close Total Funds Raised to Date to date to date 113 9c.9c. FundFund RaisingRaising ScoreboardScoreboard Distribution of Private Equity Funds (Jan-Jun 00 & 01) Jan-Jun 2000 Jan-Jun 2001 Amount Surveyed: US$5.3 billion Amount Surveyed: US$6.8 billion Technology Technology 53% 58% Conv'l Conv'l Re- Private Private structuring Equi ty Re- Equity 18% 29% 23.6% structuring 18% Note: Survey excluded Australia & New Zealand's fund pool and Global Funds Source : ASIA PRIVATE EQUITY REVIEW 114 9d.9d. FundFund RaisingRaising ScoreboardScoreboard Regional Private Equity Firms’ Investment Profile Industry Breakdown by Amount Industry Breakdown by Amount Amount: US$1.7b (Jan-Jun2000) Amount: US$1.82b (Jan-Jun2001) Banking & Food Finance 0.7% 3.3% Banking & Others Semiconduct- Finance 5.5% or 23.16% 31.93% Manufactur- Ing Telecommun- Internet 31.4% Others ication 44.4% 5.45% 19.26% Biotech 0.27% Reverse Internet Auto Takeover 2.02%Consumer IT Industry IT 8.2% Goods 6.59% 7.11% 6.5% 4.22% 115 10.10. ExtremeExtreme CompetitionCompetition ¾ Too many players: Local & Foreign/Domestic & Regional ◈ HSBC Private Equity ◈ ABN-AMRO Asia ◈ JAFCO ◈ PAMA ◈ ING/Barings ◈ Walden ◈ AIG ◈ Citicorp ◈ Transpac Capital ◈ Morgan Stanley ◈ China Assets ◈ Tech Pacific ◈ Merrill Lynch ◈ ChinaVest ◈ Intel Capital ◈ Golden Sachs ¾ Value-added services/advantages ◈ Financial and strategic planning ◈ Recruitment of key personnel ◈ Access to international markets and technology ◈ Introduction to strategic partners and acquisition targets ◈ Obtain a public listing 116 10a.10a. ExtremeExtreme CompetitionCompetition (cond’t) ¾ Statistics: No. of Venture Capital firms Country 1997 1998 % change 1999 % change Australia 66 85 28.8% 124 45.9% Hong Kong/china 107 129 20.6% 190 47.3% India 42 41 -2.4% 44 7.3% Indonesia 46 46 0.0% 44 -4.3% Japan 210 231 10.0% 221 -4.3% Korea 128 123 -3.9% 131 6.5% Malaysia 19 20 5.3% 28 40.0% Myanmar 3 2 -33.3% 1 -50.0% New Zealand 7 13 85.7% 16 23.1% Pakistan 3 3 0.0% 4 33.3% Philippines 8 10 25.0% 14 40.0% Singapore 59 64 8.5% 85 32.8% Sri Lanka 10 12 20.0% 12 0.0% Taiwan 74 124 67.6% 132 6.5% Thailand 7 8 14.3% 15 87.5% Vietnam 7 7 0.0% 7 0.0% Total 796 918 15.3% 1068 16.3% Source: AVCJ 2001 Directory 117 11.11. WhatWhat areare VCVC lookinglooking forfor inin return?return? ¾ Big equity upside from appreciation in the value of the Company. ¾ Return target – normally in the range of IRR 15%-25% in Asia. ¾ Exit for VC to take place either before or at the same time with the entrepreneur. 118 12.12. ClassicClassic CasesCases inin HongHong KongKong ¾ Sing Tao Holdings – Lazard Asia Investment ¾ Siu Fung Ceramics – Peregrine & Consortium ¾ Cheung Wah Development – Softbank ¾ Acme Landis Holdings (i100) – H & Q “Can you think of any other case in Hong Kong?” 119 13.13. PointsPoints toto TakeTake HomeHome ¾ Venture Capital has become an alternative class of assets on its own ¾ Extremely competitive marketplace ¾ Useful conduit of capital between those who need and those who have ¾ High risk – high returns (Universal Truth!!!) ¾ Tough but fun career for those in it! 120 14.14. GeneralGeneral InformationInformation ¾ Industry Associations ◈ Asian Venture Capital Journal/AVCJ Holdings http://www.asiaventure.com mail: [email protected] ◈ Hong Kong Venture Capital Association http://www.hkvca.com.hk mail: [email protected] ¾ Book Recommendation ◈ Title: Fundamentals of Venture Capital ◈ Author: Joseph W. Bartlett ◈ Publisher: Madison Books ◈ ISBN# : 1568331266 121 ◈ 15.15. AboutAbout JAFCOJAFCO ¾ JAFCO Co. Ltd. – largest venture capital manager in Japan ¾ Founding shareholders: Nomura, Sanwa Bank, Nippon Life ¾ Operation since 1973; listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange ¾ Offices in the U.S. (Palo Alto, Boston), Europe (London) and Asia (9 offices) ¾ Over US$3 billion under management with US$800 million in Asia Pacific ¾ Asian’s Track record: over 250 companies of which 120 had exited (73 had obtained IPO) ¾ Nomura – our largest shareholder has over 60 offices in 26 countries 122 ThankThank YouYou JAFCOJAFCO InvestmentInvestment (HK)(HK) LtdLtd Tel.: (852) 25361960 Website: www.jafcoasia.com 123.
Recommended publications
  • Private Equity

    Private Equity

    PRIVATE EQUITY Viney Sawhney <[email protected]> Introduction – Course Description This course is the study of private equity money invested in companies that are not publicly traded on a stock exchange or invested in as part of buyouts of publicly traded companies. The objective of the course is to provide a comprehensive overview and in-depth understanding of the private equity markets. Private equity finance will be explored from a number of perspectives, beginning with the structure and objectives of private equity funds; followed by the analysis and financing of investment opportunities; and finally crafting strategies for harvesting investments. There has been an increase in both the supply of and demand for private equity. On the supply side, the amount of private equity under management - by partnerships investing in private equity, growth investments, leveraged buyouts, distressed companies, real estate, etc. - has increased dramatically in recent years. On the demand side, an increasing number of individuals and companies are interested in starting and growing their respective businesses. Collectively, small and medium businesses are focused in gaining access to Private Equity and understanding the dynamics of this unique funding source. Course objectives The main objective of the course is to provide students with the necessary theoretical and conceptual tools used in private equity deals. The course provides the intellectual framework used in the private equity process, valuation in private equity settings, creating term sheets, the process of due diligence and deal structuring. Other learning objectives include building an understanding of harvesting through IPO or M&A, public-private partnerships and sovereign wealth funds.
  • Corporate Profile First Pacific Is a Hong Kong-Based Investment Management and Holding Company with Operations Located in Asia

    Corporate Profile First Pacific Is a Hong Kong-Based Investment Management and Holding Company with Operations Located in Asia

    於亞洲創建 長期價值 第一太平有限公司 二零一零年年報 年報 二零一零年 Corporate Profile First Pacific is a Hong Kong-based investment management and holding company with operations located in Asia. Its principal business interests relate to Telecommunications, Infrastructure, Consumer Food Products and Natural Resources. Listed in Hong Kong, First Pacific’s shares are also available for trading in the United States through American Depositary Receipts. As at 21 March 2011, First Pacific’s economic interest in PLDT is 26.5%, in MPIC 55.6%, in Indofood 50.1% and in Philex* 31.3%. First Pacific’s principal investments are summarized on page 164. * Two Rivers Pacific Holdings Corporation, a Philippine affiliate of First Pacific, holds an additional 15.0% interest in Philex. Vision Strategy • Create long-term value in Asia • Identify undervalued or underperforming assets with strong growth potential and possible synergies Mission which bring strong cash flows • Manage investments by setting strategic direction, • Active management developing business plans and defining targets • Enhance potential • Raise governance levels to world-class standards at • Enrich lives the investee companies Contents Inside Corporate Profile, Vision, Mission 43 Chairman’s Letter 71 Financial Review Front and Strategy 71 Liquidity and Financial Cover 44 Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer’s Letter Resources 1 Financial Performance and 74 Financial Risk Management 46 Board of Directors and Recurring Profit 78 Adjusted NAV Per Share Senior Executives 2 Ten-year Statistical Summary 79 Statutory
  • Website: Friend Or Foe?

    Website: Friend Or Foe?

    VENTURE CAPITAL & PRIVATE EQUITY FUNDS DESKBOOK SERIES Website: Friend or Foe? Many venture capital firms and private equity firms create and maintain websites—usually eponymous— to achieve such far-ranging goals as building brand recognition, communicating with their existing investors, and creating channels of information with existing and potential portfolio companies. It is appropriate to use a website for such purposes and others, such as describing the industry sectors of interest to a venture capital or private equity firm, provided that certain precautions are taken as described in this article. Caution is warranted when establishing a website because there may be unintended legal consequences lurking within seemingly harmless web content. A scrubbed website can be a true friend for a venture capital or private equity firm. A neglected or carelessly composed website can be a terrible foe. Do Not Solicit Investors When engaged in a private offering (i.e., raising a fund), it is important that venture capital firms and private equity firms keep in mind that many of their funds are relying on exemptions to a number of different securities laws that all have one common requirement: there must be no public offering of securities by or on behalf of any of such private funds managed by such firms. Websites are generally viewed as being publicly available. Regulatory authorities, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have adopted very broad views of what constitutes an offering. As such, any materials on a website that could be viewed as a general solicitation or general advertisement may be considered a public offering by the SEC or other regulatory authorities.
  • Walker Report

    Walker Report

    WALKER REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 Our Support of the Walker Report Over the past several years, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. Overview of KKR and our private equity business (together with its affiliates, “KKR,” “we” or “us”) has been KKR is a leading global investment firm that manages multiple working to increase the transparency of our investment activities alternative asset classes, including private equity, energy, and processes, both through formal compliance with guidelines infrastructure, real estate and credit, with strategic partners recommending increased levels of disclosure as well as through that manage hedge funds. KKR aims to generate attractive voluntary initiatives with our clients, partners, portfolio investment returns for its fund investors by following a patient companies and the public at large. and disciplined investment approach, employing world-class In November 2007, a working group formed by The British people, and driving growth and value creation with KKR portfolio Private Equity and Venture Capital Association (“BVCA”) and companies. KKR invests its own capital alongside the capital it led by Sir David Walker issued the Guidelines for Disclosure manages for fund investors and provides financing solutions and Transparency in Private Equity. That publication, which is and investment opportunities through its capital markets also known as the “Walker Report,” makes specific business. References to KKR’s investments may include the recommendations for improving the level of public disclosure activities of its sponsored funds. For additional information by private equity firms operating in the United Kingdom. about KKR & Co. Inc. (NYSE: KKR), please visit KKR’s website at www.kkr.com and on Twitter @KKR_Co.
  • FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: Commission

    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: Commission

    Louisville Metro Fre Revenue FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: Commission Venture Capital Funds and Family Limited Partnerships WHICH BUSINESS ENTITIES QUALIFY FOR THE VENTURE CAPITAL FUND OL TAX EXEMPTION? The occupational license taxes do not apply to venture capital funds business entities as defined in LMCO 110.03(A)(12). To qualify for the exemption, the venture capital fund must be a limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or limited partnership formed and operated for the exclusive purpose of buying, holding and/or selling securities (including debt Are business entities that qualify for securities), on its own behalf and not as a broker, primarily in non- publicly traded companies, and the capital of the fund is primarily the Venture Capital Funds or Family derived from investments by entities and/or individuals which are Limited Partnerships tax exemptions neither related to nor affiliated with the fund. See LMCO required to file an annual OL return? 110.03(A)(12) for additional information and definitions. So long as the entity files an annual informational return along with the required WHICH BUSINESS ENTITIES QUALIFY FOR THE documentation, the entity is not responsible FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OL TAX for filing an occupational license return. EXEMPTION? The occupational license taxes do not apply to family limited partnership business entities as defined in LMCO 110.03(A)(13). To qualify for the exemption, the income received by family limited partnerships must be from a family-owned non-corporate entity where the sole activity of such entity is the production of investment income not derived from tangible or real property and at least 95% of the equity of the family limited partnership is owned by members of the family.
  • Weekly Internet / Digital Media / Saas Sector Summary

    Weekly Internet / Digital Media / Saas Sector Summary

    Weekly Internet / Digital Media / SaaS Sector Summary Week of July 14th, 2014 Industry Stock Market Valuation Internet / Digital Media / SaaS Last 12 Months Last 3 Months 180 120 14.6% 160 11.9% 60.8% 10.4% 10.4% 110 7.9% 140 22.3% 7.7% 21.0% 6.6% 20.4% 5.9% 120 20.0% 5.1% 16.3% 100 13.9% 100 13.0% 10.8% 80 90 7/12/13 9/23/13 12/5/13 2/16/14 4/30/14 7/12/14 4/11/14 5/4/14 5/27/14 6/19/14 7/12/14 (1) (2) (3) (4) Search / Online Advertising Internet Commerce Internet Content Publishers (5) (6) (7) (8) NASDAQ Diversified Marketing Media Conglomerates Gaming SaaS Notes: 1) Search/Online Advertising Composite includes: BCOR, BLNX-GB, CNVR, CRTO, GOOG, FUEL, MCHX, MM, MRIN, MSFT, QNST, RLOC, RUBI, TRMR, TWTR, YHOO, YNDX, YUME. 2) Internet Commerce Composite includes: AMZN, AWAY, COUP, CPRT, DRIV, EBAY, EXPE, FLWS, LINTA, NFLX, NILE, OPEN, OSTK, PCLN, PRSS, SSTK, STMP, TZOO, VPRT, ZU. 3) Internet Content Composite includes: AOL, CRCM, DHX, DMD, EHTH, IACI, MOVE, MWW, RATE, RENN, RNWK, SCOR, SFLY, TRLA, TST, TTGT, UNTD, WBMD, WWWW, XOXO, Z. 4) Publishers Composite includes: GCI, MMB-FR, NWSA, NYT, PSON-GB, SSP, TRI, UBM-GB, WPO. 5) Diversified Marketing Composite includes: ACXM, EFX, EXPN-GB, HAV-FR, HHS, IPG, MDCA, NLSN, VCI, WPP-GB. 6) Media Conglomerates Composite includes: CBS, CMCSA, DIS, DISCA, LGF, SNE, TWX, VIA.B. 7) Gaming Composite includes: 2432-JP, 3632-JP, 3765-JP, 700-HK, ATVI, CYOU, EA, GA, GAME, GLUU, NTES, PWRD, UBI-FR, ZNGA.
  • Private Equity in the 2000S 1 Private Equity in the 2000S

    Private Equity in the 2000S 1 Private Equity in the 2000S

    Private equity in the 2000s 1 Private equity in the 2000s Private equity in the 2000s relates to one of the major periods in the history of private equity and venture capital. Within the broader private equity industry, two distinct sub-industries, leveraged buyouts and venture capital experienced growth along parallel although interrelated tracks. The development of the private equity and venture capital asset classes has occurred through a series of boom and bust cycles since the middle of the 20th century. As the 20th century ended, so, too, did the dot-com bubble and the tremendous growth in venture capital that had marked the previous five years. In the wake of the collapse of the dot-com bubble, a new "Golden Age" of private equity ensued, as leveraged buyouts reach unparalleled size and the private equity firms achieved new levels of scale and institutionalization, exemplified by the initial public offering of the Blackstone Group in 2007. Bursting the Internet Bubble and the private equity crash (2000–2003) The Nasdaq crash and technology slump that started in March 2000 shook virtually the entire venture capital industry as valuations for startup technology companies collapsed. Over the next two years, many venture firms had been forced to write-off large proportions of their investments and many funds were significantly "under water" (the values of the fund's investments were below the amount of capital invested). Venture capital investors sought to reduce size of commitments they had made to venture capital funds and in numerous instances, investors sought to unload existing commitments for cents on the dollar in the secondary market.
  • Start Ups and Emerging Companies – 101: Choice of Entity

    Start Ups and Emerging Companies – 101: Choice of Entity

    JANUARY 14, 2013 | HANSON BRIDGETT CORPORATE PRACTICE GROUP What type of corporate entity is best for my business? Start Ups and As a founder/entrepreneur, you (and your partners) have an idea Emerging for a new venture are willing to invest your time and money in the start-up of a new business. Selecting the right corporate vehicle Companies – 101: for your business is critical to your success. The goal of the Choice of Entity founder is to choose an entity that (1) "fits the business model" for the venture, and (2) makes the company "attractive" to investors. How do you know what entity is the best fit? A good starting point for making this determination is to ask yourself: "How am I going to fund my company?" Many founders start their company with their own funds on a "shoe string", focusing their resources on developing the "big idea" and bringing the product to market. However, after your "founder funds" are exhausted (self-funding), you will need to either sell your company, or seek investment from one or more of the following Private Equity sources: • Friends and Family • Angel Funds • Venture Capital by Derek A. Ridgway The investment path you choose will pay a significant role in the corporate vehicle you select for your company. What are the typical corporate entities to choose from? Generally, there are three main types of entities to choose from: Corporations, Limited Liability Companies and Partnerships. Corporations: A Corporation is owned by its shareholders, who buy stock or shares in the company in exchange for consideration.
  • NVCA 2021 YEARBOOK Data Provided by Dear Readers

    NVCA 2021 YEARBOOK Data Provided by Dear Readers

    YEARBOOK Data provided by Credits & Contact National Venture Capital Association NVCA Board of Directors 2020-2021 (NVCA) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Washington, DC | San Francisco, CA nvca.org | [email protected] | 202-864-5920 BARRY EGGERS Lightspeed Venture Partners, Venture Forward Chair Washington, DC | San Francisco, CA MICHAEL BROWN Battery Ventures, Chair-Elect ventureforward.org | [email protected] JILL JARRETT Benchmark, Treasurer ANDY SCHWAB 5AM Ventures, Secretary BOBBY FRANKLIN President and CEO PATRICIA NAKACHE Trinity Ventures, At-Large JEFF FARRAH General Counsel EMILY MELTON Threshold Ventures, At-Large JUSTIN FIELD Senior Vice President of Government MOHAMAD MAKHZOUMI NEA, At-Large Affairs MARYAM HAQUE Executive Director, Venture AT-LARGE Forward MICHAEL CHOW Research Director, NVCA and PETER CHUNG Summit Partner Venture Forward DIANE DAYCH Granite Growth Health Partners STEPHANIE VOLK Vice President of Development BYRON DEETER Bessemer Venture Partners RHIANON ANDERSON Programs Director, Venture SCOTT DORSEY High Alpha Forward RYAN DRANT Questa Capital CHARLOTTE SAVERCOOL Senior Director of PATRICK ENRIGHT Longitude Capital Government Affairs STEVE FREDRICK Grotech Ventures MICHELE SOLOMON Director of Administration CHRIS GIRGENTI Pritzker Group Venture Capital DEVIN MILLER Manager of Communications and JOE HOROWITZ Icon Ventures Digital Strategy GEORGE HOYEM In-Q-Tel JASON VITA, Director of Programming and CHARLES HUDSON Precursor Ventures Industry Relations JILL JARRETT Benchmark JONAS MURPHY Manager of Government Affairs
  • Venture Capital, Private Equity and Hedge Funds: an Introduction

    Venture Capital, Private Equity and Hedge Funds: an Introduction

    Venture Capital, Private Equity and Hedge Funds: An Introduction UGBA 195T, 2 units Course Overview: This course will provide a high level introduction to venture capital, private equity, and hedge funds. In the course, students will learn: • What are venture capital, private equity, and hedge funds? • What types of investments do they make? • How do they generate superior investment returns? • What do the professionals in these firms do? • How are these firms organized, structured and managed? • What are the career paths in these firms? • What are the risks and rewards experienced by these firms? Teaching Method: The course will use Harvard Business School case studies written for MBA students. There will be some lectures to introduce core concepts. The course syllabus will focus approximately 50% on venture capital, 25% on private equity and 25% on hedge funds. Prerequisites / Grading / Homework: • Course is best suited for UC Berkeley seniors with extensive prior course work in business. First preference to seniors enrolled in Haas School of Business. • Some interest or experience in start-ups, investing or finance will be helpful. • Homework will include reading and analyzing one business case per week of approximately 15- 20 pages in length. • Grading will be based on classroom participation (25%), pop quizzes (25%) and a final project (50%). Instructor: Rob Chandra serves on the Haas School of Business faculty where he teaches an undergraduate course on alternative investing and co-teaches an MBA course on entrepreneurship. He is a general partner with Avid Park Ventures, a San Francisco based venture capital firm. His current or prior investments include Alibaba, CrowdStrike, Dropbox, Lending Club, MongoDB, Nutanix, Robinhood, Snap, Twitter and Uber.
  • 2018 FINTECH100 Leading Global Fintech Innovators 2017 FINTECH100 ������� ������ ������� ��������

    2018 FINTECH100 Leading Global Fintech Innovators 2017 FINTECH100

    2018 FINTECH100 Leading Global Fintech Innovators 2017 FINTECH100 Leadin loba Fintec nnovators 1 1 2016 2017 Fintech100 Report FINTECH100 Leadin loba Fintec nnovators Company #00 1 | Fintech Innovators 2016 1 2015 Fintech100 Report FINTECH 100 Leading Global “ Fintech Innovators Report 2015 Company Description At a Glance Tag Line Located Year Founded Key People Website Specialisation Staff Enabler or Disruptor Key Investors Ownership Size User Engagement $ $ $ $ $ The 100 Leading Fintech Innovators Report 2016 Fintech100 Report The 50 Best Fintech Innovators Report 2014 Fintech100 Report 2 About the List The Fintech100 is a collaborative effort between H2 Ventures and KPMG. In its fifth year, the Fintech100 uncovers and evaluates the most innovative Fintech companies globally. The Fintech100 comprises a ‘Top 50’ and an ‘Emerging 50’ and highlights those companies globally that are taking advantage of technology and driving disruption within the financial services industry. A judging panel comprised of senior partners from H2 Ventures and KPMG has decided the final composition of the Fintech100 list. H2 Ventures H2 Ventures is a global thought leader in fintech venture capital investment. Founded by brothers Ben and Toby Heap, and based in Sydney, Australia, it invests alongside entrepreneurs and other investors in early stage fintech ventures. H2 Ventures is the manager of the H2 Accelerator – Australia’s only dedicated fintech accelerator – and operates out of Sydney’s dynamic Startup Hub. Twitter @H2_Ventures LinkedIn H2 Ventures Facebook H2 Ventures KPMG Global Fintech The financial services industry is transforming with the emergence of innovative, new products, channels and business models. This wave of disruption is primarily driven by evolving customer expectations, digitalisation, as well as continued regulatory and cost pressures.
  • GMO Trust Annual Report February 28, 2021

    GMO Trust Annual Report February 28, 2021

    GMO Trust Annual Report February 28, 2021 Climate Change Fund Cyclical Focus Fund Emerging Domestic Opportunities Fund Emerging Markets Fund International Equity Fund Japan Value Creation Fund Quality Fund Resources Fund Tax-Managed International Equities Fund U.S. Equity Fund U.S. Small Cap Value Fund For a free copy of the Funds’ proxy voting guidelines, shareholders may call 1-617-346-7646 (collect), visit GMO’s website at www.gmo.com or visit the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. Information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 will be available without charge on GMO’s website at www.gmo.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov no later than August 31 of each year. The Funds file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarter of each fiscal year on Form N-PORT, which is available on the Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. The Funds have a policy with respect to disclosure of portfolio holdings under which they may also make a complete schedule of portfolio holdings available on GMO’s website at www.gmo.com. This report is prepared for the general information of shareholders. It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a prospectus for the GMO Trust, which contains a complete discussion of the risks associated with an investment in these Funds and other important information.