DOCSLIB.ORG

Synchrotron Radiation Dominated Hadron Colliders E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Synchrotron Radiation Dominated Hadron Colliders E SYNCHROTRON RADIATION DOMINATED HADRON COLLIDERS E. Keil, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract 2.1 Interaction Region Design The synchrotron radiation damping time becomes small For round beams with equal normalised horizontal and ver- = 2 compared to the beam lifetime when the beam energy in tical emittances z γσz /βz, equal β-functions and van- a circular hadron collider reaches about 100 TeV and the ishing dispersion at the interaction point IP, and ignoring dipole field about 10 T. This paper discusses an approach crossing angle and “hourglass” effect, luminosity L and to the design of these colliders such that the desired per- beam-beam tune shift ξ are with bunch population N and formance parameters, e.g. beam-beam tune shift and lumi- collision frequency f: nosity are achieved at the equilibrium values of the beam 2 N f Nrp emittance and momentum spread. The design procedure is = = L 4 ξ 4 (2) described, involving the design of the interaction regions, πσxσy πn the arcs, and the RF system. The thresholds and/or growth The beams cross at an angle in order to separate them at rates of several collective effects, and the growth times for the parasitic collision points at multiples of half the bunch intra-beam scattering are estimated. The consequences of spacing near the interaction point. Solving (2) for Nf the synchrotron radiation are discussed in the conclusions. yields with the usual relativistic factor γ: Nf = Lβxrp=(γξ) 1 INTRODUCTION (3) = As noticed in the high-field option of really large hadron The choices of βx βy at the IP and of the crossing an- gle are related [5]. Tab. 1 shows the assumed and resulting colliders (RLHC) [1], the damping time τz of the oscilla- = tions in the three degrees of freedom due to the emission IP parameters. The bunch spacing s fixes f by s cβ=f; = of synchrotron radiation becomes about an hour at a beam c is the speed of light. For given βx βy and L, N fol- energy E ≈ 100 TeV and a dipole field B ≈ 12 T: lows from (3), and from (2). The beam-beam lifetime τbb =(rp/cσtot)(βxC=γξ) is calculated for one interac- 1 16644 C tion region, independent of L, proportional to C and =E, τz(h)Jz = (1) and small for good performance parameters (small βx and E(TeV)B(T)2 2πρ large ξ); σtot = 120 mb is the total cross section.The small RMS radii σx = σy, compared to LHC [6] or SSC [2], are Here, z labels the plane (x for horizontal, y for vertical largely due to the higher energy and adiabatic damping.The betatron oscillations, s for synchrotron oscillations), Jz is normalised emittance n has about 1/3 of the SSC value. the damping partition number, C is the circumference and ρ the bending radius in the arcs of the collider; C=2π>R Table 1: Interaction region parameters for a 100 TeV p-p includes the long straight√ insertions for the experiments. collider with ξx = ξy =0:003 [6], βx = βy =0:5 m, Scaling their length like E from the SSC [2], and assum- s =3:75 m, total inelastic cross section σinel =60mb. ing four interaction regions, one gets C=2π = R+1708 m. Since the beam lifetime and the duration of a colliding Bunch population N=109 9.03 beam run are usually many hours, the beams have the equi- Normalised emittance n/nm 367.4 librium beam parameters, given by the equilibrium of quan- RMS beam radius σx = σy/µm 1.313 tum excitation and synchrotron radiation damping, during 0 0 RMS divergence σx = σy/µr 2.626 most of their lifetime. Designing an RLHC such that the Luminosity L/(nbs)−1 30.1 beam-beam limit and the desired luminosity are achieved at Events/collision nc = Lσinel=f 22.6 the equilibrium beam parameters has the advantage that the Beam-beam lifetime τbb/h 42.4 emittances of the injected and circulating beams are decou- pled, and that the collider is insensitive to slow phenomena 2.2 Arc Design with growth times longer than the damping time. The arcs should provide just enough quantum excitation to achieve the emittance listed in Tab. 1. The average arc ra- 2 DESIGN PROCEDURE dius R>ρincludes space for the quadrupoles, sextupoles, etc., and short straight sections in the arc cells. In separated + − The design procedure for e e colliders [3] in the DE- function FODO cells with µx = µy, normalised horizontal SIGN program [4] adjusts the arc and RF system param- emittance n, arc tune Q and cell length Lp are related by: eters to achieve a specified luminosity. Adapting it to p-p 3 colliders implies setting the mass mp, classical radius rp, 1 55λp RF(µ) γ µxR n = √ Lp = (4) and Compton wavelength λp to their proton values. 2 32 3 Jxρ Q Q 0-7803-4376-X/98/$10.00 1998 IEEE 104 The correction factor for finite phase advances F (µ) [7] DESIGN program finds the RF system parameters listed tends towards unity for µx = µy → 0. The insertions do in Tab. 4; σe and σs are small. However, the bunch area not contribute to quantum excitation and momentum com- 4πEσeσs=c, is comparable to those of LHC and SSC. paction α =(2πR=C)Q−2. I assume that round beams with y ≈ x are achieved by coupling horizontal and ver- tical betatron oscillations, and apply a factor 1/2 to the tra- Table 4: Parameters of the RF system of a 100 TeV p-p col- = 228 9 ditional form of (4). Tab. 2 shows the parameters of the lider with circumference C : km, harmonic number = 305415 =24 arcs. The dipole field shown [8] is needed in order to ob- hRF , and quantum lifetime τq h. tain colliders in the parameter range I wish to study. Voltage VRF/MV 35.9 −6 Relative RMS energy spread σe=10 6.53 Table 2: Parameters of the arcs of a 100 TeV p-p collider Bucket height/10−6 22.5 =12 =2778 =125 −3 with B T, ρ : km and R/ρ : [6] Synchrotron tune Qs=10 1.27 Bunch length σs/mm 27.5 Arc tune Q 80.62 Bunch area 4πEσeσs=c/eVs 0.754 Phase advance µx=2π = µy=2π 0.25 Cell length Lp/m 677 Maximum amplitude function βx/m 1156 The time needed for a particle to radiate all its energy, Maximum dispersion Dx/m 8.93 and thus also the time needed for acceleration to the oper- ating energy (when synchrotron radiation is neglected) is one half of τx. If the acceleration time T is to be shorter The cold vacuum chamber acts as a cryopump. The per- than τx=2, the peak RF voltage must be higher than that forated beam screen absorbs the synchrotron radiation. Its listed in Tab. 4 in the ratio τx=(2T ). temperature should be much higher than that of the vacuum chamber for good Carnot efficiency. Collective effects, in 3 COLLECTIVE EFFECTS particular the resistive wall instability (cf. Section 3.1), and the forces during a magnet quench must also be considered. The resistive wall instability, coherent synchrotron tune shift, longitudinal microwave instability, and transverse 2.3 Synchrotron Radiation mode coupling instability TMCI are important [10] for the RLHC [11]. I only study the dominant contribution, and Tab. 3 shows several parameters related to the synchrotron assume injection at 5 TeV, and a bunch area 4πEσeσs=c = P radiation. The total synchrotron radiation power per 1 eVs there. Below, I is the total beam current, and Ib beam is three orders of magnitude higher than the 3.6 kW is the bunch current. The effective impedances Zeff are = 2 in the LHC. The normalised power p P= πR is almost the weighted sums of Z(!) and the bunch power spec- two orders of magnitude higher than the 0.2 W in the LHC. trum [12]. Tab. 5 lists thresholds and growth rates at the Φ The photon flux , the number of photons per metre of arc energies where they are most critical.The longitudinal mi- and per second, is about half the value in LEP2, operating crowave and the transverse mode coupling instabilities are at 96 GeV and a total current of 14 mA [9]. below threshold by good factors [13], and not discussed. Table 3: Synchrotron radiation parameters of a 100 TeV 3.1 Transverse Resistive Wall Instability =28 p-p collider with synchrotron radiation loss Us MeV The growth rate of the resistive wall instability τ −1 is [12]: =15 w and horizontal damping time τx : h. s ¯ −1 = rpβIFw µ0ρwCc Beam current I/mA 116 τw 3 (5) eZ0γb π(n − Q) Synchrotron radiation power P /MW 3.24 Normalised radiation power p/Wm−1 14.8 Here, (n − Q)=0:25 is the tune of the n-th mode, Critical energy Ec/keV 12.9 15 −1 Z0 is the impedance of free space, b is the radius of the Photon flux Φ=10 (sm) 23.3 beam screen, and β¯ ≈ R=Q is the average β-function. The wall penetration factor Fw =7:17 describes the effects of a beam screen similar to that in the LHC [6], consisting of a thin inner Cu layer and a thicker layer of stainless steel. 2.4 RF System Design In the LHC, about half the wall resistivity is caused by the The values of Us in Tab. 3, σe and τq in Tab. 4, and 10 % of the circumference with a Cu vacuum chamber at the parameters of the super-conducting RF cavities, i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FROM KEK-PS to J-PARC Yoshishige Yamazaki, J-PARC, KEK & JAEA, Japan
    FROM KEK-PS TO J-PARC Yoshishige Yamazaki, J-PARC, KEK & JAEA, Japan Abstract target are located in series. Every 3 s or so, depending The user experiments at J-PARC have just started. upon the usage of the main ring (MR), the beam is JPARC, which stands for Japan Proton Accelerator extracted from the RCS to be injected to the MR. Here, it Research Complex, comprises a 400-MeV linac (at is ramped up to 30 GeV at present and slowly extracted to present: 180 MeV, being upgraded), a 3-GeV rapid- Hadron Experimental Hall, where the kaon-production cycling synchrotron (RCS), and a 50-GeV main ring target is located. The experiments using the kaons are (MR) synchrotron, which is now in operation at 30 GeV. conducted there. Sometimes, it is fast extracted to The RCS will provide the muon-production target and the produce the neutrinos, which are sent to the Super spallation-neutron-production target with a beam power Kamiokande detector, which is located 295-km west of of 1 MW (at present: 120 kW) at a repetition rate of 25 the J-PARC site. In the future, we are conceiving the Hz. The muons and neutrons thus generated will be used possibility of constructing a test facility for an in materials science, life science, and others, including accelerator-driven nuclear waste transmutation system, industrial applications. The beams that are fast extracted which was shifted to Phase II. We are trying every effort from the MR generate neutrinos to be sent to the Super to get funding for this facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Synchrotron Light Source
    Synchrotron Light Source The evolution of light sources echoes the progress of civilization in technology, and carries with it mankind's hopes to make life's dreams come true. The synchrotron light source is one of the most influential light sources in scientific research in our times. Bright light generated by ultra-rapidly orbiting electrons leads human beings to explore the microscopic world. Located in Hsinchu Science Park, the NSRRC operates a high-performance synchrotron, providing X-rays of great brightness that is unattainable in conventional laboratories and that draws NSRRC users from academic and technological communities worldwide. Each year, scientists and students have been paying over ten thousand visits to the NSRRC to perform experiments day and night in various scientific fields, using cutting-edge technologies and apparatus. These endeavors aim to explore the vast universe, scrutinize the complicated structures of life, discover novel nanomaterials, create a sustainable environment of green energy, unveil living things in the distant past, and deliver better and richer material and spiritual lives to mankind. Synchrotron Light Source Light, also known as electromagnetic waves, has always been an important means for humans to observe and study the natural world. The electromagnetic spectrum includes not only visible light, which can be seen with a naked human eye, but also radiowaves, microwaves, infrared light, ultraviolet light, X-rays, and gamma rays, classified according to their wave lengths. Light of Trajectory of the electron beam varied kind, based on its varied energetic characteristics, plays varied roles in the daily lives of human beings. The synchrotron light source, accidentally discovered at the synchrotron accelerator of General Electric Company in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling Behavior of Circular Colliders Dominated by Synchrotron Radiation
    SCALING BEHAVIOR OF CIRCULAR COLLIDERS DOMINATED BY SYNCHROTRON RADIATION Richard Talman Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics Cornell University White Paper at the 2015 IAS Program on the Future of High Energy Physics Abstract time scales measured in minutes, for example causing the The scaling formulas in this paper—many of which in- beams to be flattened, wider than they are high [1] [2] [3]. volve approximation—apply primarily to electron colliders In this regime scaling relations previously valid only for like CEPC or FCC-ee. The more abstract “radiation dom- electrons will be applicable also to protons. inated” phrase in the title is intended to encourage use of This paper concentrates primarily on establishing scaling the formulas—though admittedly less precisely—to proton laws that are fully accurate for a Higgs factory such as CepC. colliders like SPPC, for which synchrotron radiation begins Dominating everything is the synchrotron radiation formula to dominate the design in spite of the large proton mass. E4 Optimizing a facility having an electron-positron Higgs ∆E / ; (1) R factory, followed decades later by a p,p collider in the same tunnel, is a formidable task. The CepC design study con- stitutes an initial “constrained parameter” collider design. relating energy loss per turn ∆E, particle energy E and bend 1 Here the constrained parameters include tunnel circumfer- radius R. This is the main formula governing tunnel ence, cell lengths, phase advance per cell, etc. This approach circumference for CepC because increasing R decreases is valuable, if the constrained parameters are self-consistent ∆E. and close to optimal.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrostatic Particle Accelerators the Cyclotron Linear Particle Accelerators the Synchrotron +
    Uses: Mass Spectrometry Uses Overview Uses: Hadron Therapy This is a technique in analytical chemistry. Ionising particles such as protons are fired into the It allows the identification of chemicals by ionising them body. They are aimed at cancerous tissue. and measuring the mass to charge ratio of each ion type Most methods like this irradiate the surrounding tissue too, against relative abundance. but protons release most of their energy at the end of their It also allows the relative atomic mass of different elements travel. (see graphs) be measured by comparing the relative abundance of the This allows the cancer cells to be targeted more precisely, with ions of different isotopes of the element. less damage to surrounding tissue. An example mass spectrum is shown below: Linear Particle Accelerators Electrostatic Particle Accelerators These are still in a straight line, but now the voltage is no longer static - it is oscillating. An electrostatic voltageis provided at one end of a vacuum tube. This means the voltage is changing - so if it were a magnet, it would be first positive, then This is like the charge on a magnet. negative. At the other end of the tube, there are particles Like the electrostatic accelerator, a charged particle is attracted to it as the charges are opposite, but just with the opposite charge. as the particle goes past the voltage changes, and the charge of the plate swaps (so it is now the same charge Like north and south poles on a magnet, the opposite charges as the particle). attract and the particle is pulled towards the voltage.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design of Advanced Steady-State Tokamak Reactor -Compact and Safety Commercial Power Plant (A-SSTR2)
    Conceptual Design of Advanced Steady-State Tokamak Reactor -Compact and Safety Commercial Power Plant (A-SSTR2)- S. NISHIO 1), K. USHIGUSA 1), S. UEDA 1), A. POLEVOI 2), K. TOBITA 1), R. KURIHARA 1), I. AOKI 1), H. OKADA 1), G. HU 3), S. KONISHI 1), I. SENDA 1), Y. MURAKAMI 1), T. ANDO 1), Y. OHARA 1), M. NISHI 1), S. JITSUKAWA 1), R. YAMADA 1), H. KAWAMURA 1), S. ISHIYAMA 1), K. OKANO 4), T. SASAKI 5), G. KURITA 1), M. KURIYAMA 1), Y. SEKI 1), M. KIKUCHI 1) 1) Naka Fusion Research Establishment, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Naka-machi, Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken, 311-0193 Japan 2) STA fellow, Kurchatov Institute, RF, 3)STA scientist exchange program, SWIP, P.R.China, 4)Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Japan, 5)Mitsubishi Fusion Center, Japan e-mail contact of main author : [email protected] Abstract. Based on the last decade JAERI reactor design studies, the advanced commercial reactor concept (A- SSTR2) which meets both economical and environmental requirements has been proposed. The A-SSTR2 is a compact power reactor (Rp=6.2m, ap=1.5m, Ip=12MA) with a high fusion power (Pf =4GW) and a net thermal efficiency of 51%. The machine configuration is simplified by eliminating a center solenoid (CS) coil system. SiC/SiC composite for blanket structure material, helium gas cooling with pressure of 10MPa and outlet temperature of 900˚C, and TiH2 for bulk shield material are introduced. For the toroidal field (TF) coil, a high temperature (T C) superconducting wire made of bismuth with the maximum field of 23Tand the critical current density of 1000A/mm2 at a temperature of 20K is applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Synchrotron Radiation R.P
    SYNCHROTRON RADIATION R.P. Walker Sincrotrone Trieste, Italy Abstract The basic properties of synchrotron radiation are described, and their relevance to the design of electron and proton rings is discussed. The development of specialized sources of synchrotron radiation is also considered. 1 . INTRODUCTION The electromagnetic radiation emitted by a charged particle beam in a circular accelerator is termed "synchrotron radiation" (SR) after its first visual observation nearly 50 years ago in the General Electric (G.E.) 70 MeV Synchrotron. The theoretical basis for understanding synchrotron radiation however goes back much further. Maxwell's equations (1873) made it clear that changing charge densities would radiate electromagnetic waves, and Hertz demonstrated these waves in 1887. The first more directly relevant development was the publication of Liénard's paper entitled "The electric and magnetic field produced by an electric charge concentrated at a point and in arbitrary motion" [1]. This work includes the energy loss formula for particles travelling on a circular path with relativistic velocities. Later, Schott published a detailed essay that included also the angular and frequency distribution of the radiation, as well as the polarization properties [2]. No further interest appears to have been taken in the topic until the early 1940's, when theoretical work in the Soviet Union showed that the energy loss may pose a limit on the maximum energy obtainable in the betatron [3]. Then in 1946 Blewett measured the energy loss due to SR in the G.E. 100 MeV betatron and found agreement with theory, but failed to detect the radiation after searching in the microwave region of the spectrum [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Accelerators
    Particle Accelerators By Stephen Lucas The subatomic Shakespeare of St.Neots Purposes of this presentation… To be able to explain how different particle accelerators work. To be able to explain the role of magnetic fields in particle accelerators. How the magnetic force provides the centripetal force in particle accelerators. Why have particle accelerators? They enable similarly charged particles to get close to each other - e.g. Rutherford blasted alpha particles at a thin piece of gold foil, in order to get the positively charged alpha particle near to the nucleus of a gold atom, high energies were needed to overcome the electrostatic force of repulsion. The more energy given to particles, the shorter their de Broglie wavelength (λ = h/mv), therefore the greater the detail that can be investigated using them as a probe e.g. – at the Stanford Linear Accelerator, electrons were accelerated to high energies and smashed into protons and neutrons revealing charge concentrated at three points – quarks. Colliding particles together, the energy is re-distributed producing new particles. The higher the collision energy the larger the mass of the particles that can be produced. E = mc2 The types of particle accelerator Linear Accelerators or a LINAC Cyclotron Synchrotron Basic Principles All accelerators are based on the same principle. A charged particle accelerates between a gap between two electrodes when there is a potential difference between them. Energy transferred, Ek = Charge, C x p.d, V Joules (J) Coulombs (C) Volts (V) Ek = QV Converting to electron volts 1 eV is the energy transferred to an electron when it moves through a potential difference of 1V.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to an Introduction to Particle Accelerators
    An Introduction to Particle Accelerators Erik Adli,, University of Oslo/CERN November, 2007 [email protected] v1.32 References • Bibliograp hy: – CAS 1992, Fifth General Accelerator Physics Course, Proceedings, 7-18 September 1992 – LHC Design Report [online] – K. Wille, The Physics of Particle Accelerators, 2000 • Other references – USPAS resource site, A. Chao, USPAS January 2007 – CAS 2005, Proceedings (in-print), J. Le Duff, B, Holzer et al. – O. Brüning: CERN student summer lectures – N. Pichoff: Transverse Beam Dynamics in Accelerators, JUAS January 2004 – U. Am aldi, presentation on Hadron therapy at CERN 2006 – Various CLIC and ILC presentations – Several figures in this presentation have been borrowed from the above references, thanks to all! Part 1 Introduction Particle accelerators for HEP •LHC:theworld: the world biggest accelerator, both in energy and size ((gas big as LEP) •Under construction at CERN today •End of magnet installation in 2007 •First collisions expected summer 2008 Particle accelerators for HEP The next big thing. After LHC, a Linear Collider of over 30 km lengg,th, will probably be needed (why?) Others accelerators • Histor ica lly: t he ma in dr iv ing force o f acce lerator deve lopment was collision of particles for high-energy physics experiments • However, today there are estimated to be around 17 000 particle accelerators in the world, and only a fraction is used in HEP • Over half of them used in medicine • Accelerator physics: a disipline in itself, growing field • Some examples: Medical applications • Therapy – The last decades: electron accelerators (converted to X-ray via a target) are used very successfully for cancer therapy) – Todayyp's research: proton accelerators instead (hadron therapy): energy deposition can be controlled better, but huge technical challenges • Imaging – Isotope production for PET scanners Advantages of proton / ion-therapy (() Slide borrowed from U.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Generation Synchrotron Light Sources
    3rd Generation Synchrotron Light Sources Francis Perez Advanced School - oPAC 3rd Generation Synchrotron Light Sources July 9th, 2014 Outline 2 Synchrotron Radiation Synchrotron Light Sources 1st, 2nd, 3rd and Next Generation Enabling technologies Insertion devices Vacuum (NEG coating) Electronics (BPMs, LLRF, FOFB) Top UP Simulation tools … Advanced School - oPAC 3rd Generation Synchrotron Light Sources July 9th, 2014 Synchrotron Radiation 3 The theoretical basis for synchrotron radiation traces back to the time of Thomson's discovery of the electron. In 1897, Larmor derived an expression from classical electrodynamics for the instantaneous total power radiated by an accelerated charged particle. The following year, Liénard extended this result to the case of a relativistic particle undergoing centripetal acceleration in a circular trajectory. Liénard's formula showed the radiated power to be proportional to (E/mc2)4/R2, where E is particle energy, m is the rest mass, and R is the radius of the trajectory Arthur L. Robinson Advanced School - oPAC 3rd Generation Synchrotron Light Sources July 9th, 2014 Synchrotron Radiation 4 Early 20th century Advanced School - oPAC 3rd Generation Synchrotron Light Sources July 9th, 2014 Synchrotron Radiation CRAB Nebulae Radiation from the Crab Nebulae is actually the synchrotron radiation of ultra relativistic electrons in interstellar magnetic fields Recorded by Chinese astronomers in 1054 Advanced School - oPAC 3rd Generation Synchrotron Light Sources July 9th, 2014 SynchrotronWhy an accelerator?
    [Show full text]
  • Synchrotron Radiation
    Synchrotron Radiation The synchrotron radiation, the emission of very relativistic and ultrarelativistic electrons gyrating in a magnetic field, is the process which dominates much of high energy astrophysics. It was originally observed in early betatron experiments in which electrons were first accelerated to ultrarelativistic energies. This process is responsible for the radio emission from the Galaxy, from supernova remnants and extragalactic radio sources. It is also responsible for the non-thermal optical and X-ray emission observed in the Crab Nebula and possibly for the optical and X-ray continuum emission of quasars. The word non-thermal is used frequently in high energy astrophysics to describe the emission of high energy particles. This an unfortunate terminology since all emission mechanisms are ‘thermal’ in some sense. The word is conventionally taken to mean ‘continuum radiation from particles, the energy spectrum of which is not Maxwellian’. In practice, continuum emission is often referred to as ‘non-thermal’ if it cannot be described by the spectrum of thermal bremsstrahlung or black-body radiation. 1 Motion of an Electron in a Uniform, Static Magnetic field We begin by writing down the equation of motion for a particle of rest mass m0, charge ze and Lorentz factor γ = (1 − v2/c2)−1/2 in a uniform static magnetic field B. d (γm0v) = ze(v × B) (1) dt We recall that the left-hand side of this equation can be expanded as follows: d dv 3 (v · a) m0 (γv) = m0γ + m0γ v (2) dt dt c2 because the Lorentz factor γ should be written γ = (1 − v · v/c2)−1/2.
    [Show full text]
  • Induction Synchrotron Experiment in the KEK PS
    Induction Synchrotron Experiment in the KEK PS Ken Takayama High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) on behalf of Super-bunch Group which consists of staffs of KEK, TIT, NAT, and Nagaoka Tech. Univ. 25-29 June, 2007 Albuquerque, USA 2007 Particle Accelerator Conference Contents ■Brief history of the Induction Synchrotron R&D at KEK ■Outline of the Induction Synchrotron (IS) ■Experimental results using the KEK 12GeV PS ■Perspective: beyond the POP experiment ■Summary History of Induction Synchrotron Research at KEK Year Major topics & outputs Events 1999 Proposal of the Induction Synchrotron concept by K.Takayama and νFACT’99 J.Kishiro 2000 R&D works on the 1MHz switching power supply started. EPAC2000 2001 R&D works on the 2.5kV, 1MHz induction acceleration cell started. PAC2001 Proposal of a Super-bunch Hadron Collider Snowmass2001 2002 ICFA-HB2002 EPAC2002,RPIA2002 2003 5 years term Project using the KEK-PS officially started with a budget PAC2003 of 5M$. ICFA-HB2003 2004 zThe first engineering model of the switching P.S. was established. APAC2004 3 induction acceleration cells (2 kVx3=6 kV) were installed. (May) EPAC2004 zFirst experimental demonstration of induction acceleration in the KEK- ICFA-HB2004 PS (Oct. - Nov.) CARE HHH2004 zBarrier trapping at the injection energy of 500MeV and a 500 nsec-long bunch was achieved. (Dec.) 2005 Proposal of All-ion Accelerators PAC2005 Another 3 induction acceleration cells (2 kVx3=6kV) were installed (Sept). zQuasi-adiabatic non-focusing transition crossing was demonstrated in the hybrid synchrotron (RF capture + induction acceleration), (Dec.) 2006 Another 4 induction acceleration cells (2 kVx4=8 kV) were installed.(Jan.) RPIA2006, HB2006 zFull demonstration of the IS concept (March) EPAC2006, HIF06 zAll-ion Accelerator was awarded a patent.
    [Show full text]
  • Synchrotron Radiation from Protons FERMILAB Operation Successes
    collider opening up a new range of J. Bosser, L. Burnod, R. Coisson, numbers of protons to be delivered energy and with the intermediate E. d'Amico, A. Hof mann and J. Mann to experiments. At the beginning of bosons of weak interactions looming to be published in Nuclear Instru­ the year, operation changed from a on the horizon, the filmmakers could ments and Methods. three-week cycle to a weekly cycle. also find themselves in on one of the In this mode, the accelerator has biggest scientific discoveries of the operated with a 7.5 s cycle and Century. 1 s flat-top to give the average of FERMILAB 1018 protons per week from the Operation successes beginning of February through the Synchrotron radiation first week in March when a two from protons A major reliability campaign is under month shutdown began. way at Fermilab and since 1 Fe­ At the beginning of the shutdown In the September issue of 1978 bruary the accelerator has averaged an eighty hour period was devoted to (page 294) we reported the first ever 1018 protons per week. A new single studying accelerator operation at observation of synchrotron radiation pulse intensity record of 2.7 x 1013 450 GeV. The machine was off for from an orbiting proton beam in the protons was set on 21 February. only ten hours due to equipment SPS. Though the proton mass and These impressive records result problems almost entirely unrelated energy (even in the SPS and Fermi­ from a combination of a seven to the increased energy.
    [Show full text]