Emigrant Political Participation in Mexico

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Emigrant Political Participation in Mexico Remittances and Votes: Emigrant political participation in Mexico Adriana Jimenez-Cuen Department of Government London School of Economics and Political Science A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy London, November 2008 UMI Number: U615282 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615282 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 I-Si/- til British Library of Political and Economic Science Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. 2 Abstract Few recent studies have shown how Mexico, like many other Latin American countries at the beginning of this century, has adopted new policies and programmes in order to maintain and (re)build economic, social and cultural bonds with its migrant communities in the US, who represent about 15 percent of Mexico’s population. Less research has been conducted on the constitutional reforms and electoral laws that allow Mexicans abroad to participate politically in their home country’s domestic affairs from afar. Employing a transnationalist approach to international migration and democratization studies, this thesis is the first major study of the politics of Mexican emigration to the US and the impact of migrants’ electoral participation in their home country’s affairs presented in political and institutional terms. The main question is how and with what consequences did the Mexican state extend formal political membership to its emigrant population both at the national and sub­ national level? Using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, this thesis shows that the implementation of emigrants’ political rights in Mexico has resulted from cross-border coalition formations between US-based political migrant groups and domestic non-PRI political parties (mainly the centre-left PRD) in a context of democratization and decentralization unfolding in Mexico, as well as the country’s insertion in the global economy. In turn, although only a small number of Mexican migrants have taken advantage of these opportunities for cross-border political action to date, the opening up of the Mexican political system creates new challenges to the incipient democratic practice. For instance, the growing influence of migrants and migrant organisations in domestic politics, the complexities of representing and being accountable to constituencies abroad and to a limited extent, the transformation of traditional political structures, especially in communities with high levels of emigration. 4 Acknowledgments My deepest gratitude goes to my supervisor, Prof. George Philip, for his continuous support, precious feedback and pragmatic advice. Without his encouragement and excellent supervision, the completion of this doctoral thesis would have not been possible. I am also indebted to my advisor, Dr. Eiko Thielemann, for stimulating discussions and valuable comments on various chapters of this thesis in their various stages. I presented parts of this work to different audiences and received valuable comments and criticisms that were helpful to clarify many aspects of my research and strengthen my arguments. I would like to mention in particular the Migration and Latin American Politics Panel at the MPSA 66th Annual Conference; Migration Matters at the MESEA Conference; the Public Policy and Migration Panel at the PSA and the Local Diasporas panel at the SLAS Annual Conference. The Latin American Studies and the Migration Studies seminars at the London School of Economics (LSE) also provided stimulating and lively discussions. The Government Department at the LSE has provided an exciting and friendly academic environment throughout my research. I feel very lucky in having met so many colleagues and friends, many of whom provided fresh insights and useful advice for my work. I would like to thank, in particular, Andrej Keba, Alex Leveringhaus, Monica Garcia Quesada, Helen Addison, Manjeet Ramgotra, Mitch Young and Iavor Rangelov, as well as Andrew Holland for excellent proofreading assistance. The indispensable financial support for this research came from grants by the Mexican Ministry of Education and the LSE, for which I am most grateful. I would like to thank Dr. Frank Laczko, for generously offering me a fellowship period at the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) in Geneva. This thesis is dedicated with all my love, admiration and gratitude to my father, Dr. Ramon Jimenez Caballero, who always believed in me. This achievement is the result of many efforts carried out not only by me, but by my parents, uncles and grandparents, who always sought to provide even more opportunities to the next generation. My interest in international migration has originated from my own family experiences; it has meant for us both an opportunity and a sacrifice. A very special thank you to my life companion Emanuele Tamburrano for being such an endless source of energy, love and inspiration, even through the most difficult times. 6 To my dad 7 Contents 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................... 14 1.1. Emigrant political participation in Latin America..................................................... 25 1.2. Research strategy.......................................................................................................... 38 1.3. Thesis structure ............................................................................................................ 42 2. Mexico’s Pattern of Democratization and Migrant Politics.........................................46 2.1. The Transnationalist Approach and the Mexican case.............................................. 46 2.1.1. Political transnationalism and translocality in the Mexican case......................51 Collective remittances and the state................................................................................54 2.1.2. Political transnationalism and the role of the state of origin............................. 59 2.2. Mexico’s pattern of democratization and migrant politics.........................................64 2.3. Towards a model of migrant politics in Mexico.........................................................72 Federal and local governments...................................................................................... 75 Political parties................................................................................................................76 Migrant organisations..................................................................................................... 77 Mainstream and transnational media and bi-national public......................... opinion 79 3. Policy antecedents and current state initiatives on migrant citizenship.....................82 3.1. The history of Mexico-US migration and Mexico’s emigration policy....................85 3.1.1. Mexico’s loss of its Northern territory and ‘open border’ policy during revolutionary Mexico.............................................................................................. 85 3.1.2. The ‘Great Repatriation’ and Mexico’s policy of return....................................88 3.1.3. The ‘bracero' programme....................................................................................94 3.1.4. The ‘Pocho 'Illegality Phase and Mexico’s lack of emigration policy............. 96 3.2. The change in Mexico’s emigration policy..............................................................101 3.2.1. Changing Mexico-US migration patterns and the US context of reception 102 3.2.2. Political and economic transformations in the country of origin..................... 106 3.2.3. Politics without Borders: New state initiatives towards migrant political inclusion...............................................................................................................110 Salinas' symbolic policies towards Mexicans abroad.................................................112 Zedillo's regionalist approach on migrants' incorporation........................................ 113 Fox' institutionalisation of migrant participation in domestic....................... affairs 116 3.2.4. Dual nationality and citizenship and the 1996 federal legal reforms 122 3.3. Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 130 4. The transnational dimension of the vote abroad bill negotiations in Mexico 133 4.1. The
Recommended publications
  • Looking at the 2006 Mexican Elections
    CONFERENCE REPORT Looking at the 2006 Mexican Elections ELECTORAL DEMOCRACY AND POLITICAL Introduction PARTIES IN MEXICO On July 2, 2006, Mexicans will go to the polls to elect Mexico’s next president and to The widely accepted idea that more renew the federal Congress (senators and competitive electoral contests eventually deputies). The composition of Mexico’s new force a more institutionalized and open government will, no doubt, be of great nomination process of candidates was relevance for Canada, in light of the deep questioned by Prud’homme in light of the relationship that exists between these two developments observed in Mexico. Instead, countries as partners in North America. he argued, what we have seen in 2005 is that parties have met the requirement of Despite the importance of these elections, institutionalization and openness to different information about the electoral process and degrees. the developments in the political race to the presidency have not been covered Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) extensively in Canada. In the case of the PRD, the ideology of internal democracy seems to compete with For this reason, the Canadian Foundation for the preference to build unity around a leader the Americas (FOCAL) in partnership with capable of holding together the multiple the Centre for North American Politics and factions within the party. The selection of Society (CNAPS) at Carleton University Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) as convened the conference Looking at the 2006 the party’s candidate indicates the Mexican Elections to provide some insights continuation of their traditional model that about the nomination process of Mexico’s bases party unity on the existence of a main political parties, on the preferences of charismatic leader.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pueblos of Morelos in Post- Revolutionary Mexico, 1920-1940
    The Dissertation Committee for Salvador Salinas III certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Zapatistas and Their World: The Pueblos of Morelos in Post- revolutionary Mexico, 1920-1940 Committee: ________________________________ Matthew Butler, Supervisor ________________________________ Jonathan Brown ________________________________ Seth Garfield ________________________________ Virginia Garrard-Burnett _________________________________ Samuel Brunk The Zapatistas and Their World: The Pueblos of Morelos in Post- revolutionary Mexico, 1920-1940 by Salvador Salinas III, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2014 To my parents The haciendas lie abandoned; semi-tropical growth burst from a thousand crannies, wreathing these monuments of a dead past in a wilderness of flowers. Green lizards dart through the deserted chapels. The bells which summoned to toil and to worship are silent. The peons are free. But they are not contented. -Ernest Gruening on Morelos, Mexico and its Heritage, New York: Appleton Century Croft, 1928, 162. Acknowledgments First I would like to thank my parents, Linda and Salvador Salinas, for their unwavering support during my graduate studies; to them I dedicate this dissertation. At the University of Texas at Austin, I am greatly indebted to my academic advisor, Dr. Matthew Butler, who for the past six years has provided insightful and constructive feedback on all of my academic work and written many letters of support on my behalf. I am also grateful for my dissertation committee members, Professor Jonathan Brown, Professor Seth Garfield, Professor Virginia Garrard-Burnett, and Professor Samuel Brunk, who all read and provided insightful feedback on this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Strategies
    Security Strategies The Hoover Institution gratefully acknowledges the following individuals and foundation for their significant support of the North American Forum, including this publication: Thomas and Barbara Stephenson KORET FOUNDATION Security Strategies Experiences of the Mexican States of Chihuahua and Nuevo León Arturo Ramírez Verdugo Reyes Ruiz González Hoover Institution Press Stanford University Stanford, California 2016 With its eminent scholars and world-renowned library and archives, the Hoover Institution seeks to improve the human condition by advancing ideas that promote economic opportunity and prosperity, while securing and safeguarding peace for America and all mankind. The views expressed in its publications are entirely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Overseers of the Hoover Institution. www.hoover.org Hoover Institution Press Publication Hoover Institution at Leland Stanford Junior University, Stanford, California 94305-6003 Copyright © 2016 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrievalsystem, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of the publisher and copyright holders. Previously published in the February (#298) edition of Este País as “estrategias de seguridad: Experiencias de los estados de Chihuahua y Nuevo León, studio de caso.” Original title in English: “Security Strategies: Experiences of the Mexican States of Chihuahua and Nuevo León, Case Study.” The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the author’s employers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Leadership Elections of the Institutional Revolutionary
    A Guide to the Leadership Elections of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, the National Action Party, and the Democratic Revolutionary Party George W. Grayson February 19, 2002 CSIS AMERICAS PROGRAM Policy Papers on the Americas A GUIDE TO THE LEADERSHIP ELECTIONS OF THE PRI, PAN, & PRD George W. Grayson Policy Papers on the Americas Volume XIII, Study 3 February 19, 2002 CSIS Americas Program About CSIS For four decades, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has been dedicated to providing world leaders with strategic insights on—and policy solutions to—current and emerging global issues. CSIS is led by John J. Hamre, formerly deputy secretary of defense, who has been president and CEO since April 2000. It is guided by a board of trustees chaired by former senator Sam Nunn and consisting of prominent individuals from both the public and private sectors. The CSIS staff of 190 researchers and support staff focus primarily on three subject areas. First, CSIS addresses the full spectrum of new challenges to national and international security. Second, it maintains resident experts on all of the world’s major geographical regions. Third, it is committed to helping to develop new methods of governance for the global age; to this end, CSIS has programs on technology and public policy, international trade and finance, and energy. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., CSIS is private, bipartisan, and tax-exempt. CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author. © 2002 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Noticias Latin American Program Newsletter Fall 2005
    NOTICIAS LATIN AMERICAN PROGRAM NEWSLETTER FALL 2005 United Nations Reform and the Role of Latin America hatever one’s position during the about the oil-for-food scandal and the terrorist heated debate over intervention in bombing of UN headquarters in Baghdad. In W Iraq, analysts and policymakers September 2003, Annan established a panel to generally agreed that the United Nations assess the changing landscape of threats facing emerged from the ordeal as a wounded institu- the international community and to recommend tion. Supporters of the invasion lamented the UN reforms aimed at effectively addressing Security Council’s impotence in enforcing its these new challenges. The High Level Panel on own resolutions, while opponents of the war Threats, Challenges, and Change released its fretted over the organization’s inability to tem- report in December 2004, laying out a broad per the actions of the world’s sole superpower. agenda for reform, including proposals to recon- Several traumatic events in 2003 led UN figure the Security Council to be more ‘repre- Secretary General Kofi Annan to conclude that sentative’ of the international community. the organization was at a “fork in the road.” On April 18, 2005, as part of its project on These included not only the bitter Security Creating Community in the Americas Council wrangling over Iraq, but also revelations Hemisphere, the Latin American Program con- vened several distinguished current and former permanent representatives to the UN to discuss UN reform and the implications for Latin America. Speakers agreed that a major restruc- turing was needed but recognized the many obstacles that still stand in the way of reaching a global consensus on how to effect change.
    [Show full text]
  • MARCH 2005) May 2005
    Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/STATE PR... Français Home Contact Us Help Search canada.gc.ca Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets Home Issue Paper MEXICO STATE PROTECTION (DECEMBER 2003-MARCH 2005) May 2005 Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Research Directorate of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada on the basis of publicly available information, analysis and comment. All sources are cited. This document is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed or conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. For further information on current developments, please contact the Research Directorate. Table of Contents MAP GLOSSARY 1. INTRODUCTION 2. BACKGROUND 3. STATE INSTITUTIONS 3.1 Governance 3.2 The Judiciary 3.3 The Police 3.4 The Military 3.5 Other Institutions 4. SITUATION OF SELECTED GROUPS 4.1 Violence Against Women 1 of 30 9/17/2013 8:10 AM Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/STATE PR... 4.2 Sexual Orientation 4.3 Crime and Corruption 4.3.1 Crime 4.3.2 Corruption 4.4 Political Activities and Organizations NOTES ON SELECTED SOURCES REFERENCES MAP Source: CNN. 15 December 2003. "Map of Mexico." <http://edition.cnn.com/TRAVEL/CITY.GUIDES/WORLD/ Americas/mexico/bigmap.html> [Accessed 9 Mar. 2005] GLOSSARY AFI Agencia Federal de Investigaciones (Federal Agency of Investigation) ALDF Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal (Federal District Legislative Assembly) CEDH 2 of 30 9/17/2013 8:10 AM Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/STATE PR..
    [Show full text]
  • Morelos | Minneapolis
    MIGRATION FROM MORELOS TO MINNESOTA: BUILDING BROADER COMMUNITIES IN THE AMERICAS Adriana Martínez Rodríguez Samuel Rosado Zaidi Fundación Comunidad Morelos Minneapolis Foundation Building Broader Communities in the Americas November 2020 Migration from Morelos to Minnesota: Building Broader Communities in the Americas Final Research Report, 2019-2020 Research, analysis and text: Adriana Martínez Rodríguez and Samuel Rosado Zaidi, Colectivo Multidisciplinario por las Alternativas Locales (COMAL) Fundación Comunidad, A.C. Humboldt 46-B, Cuernavaca, Centro, Centro, CP 62000, Morelos. Teléfono 777 314 1841 www.comunidad.org.mx The Minneapolis Foundation 800 IDS Center, 80 S Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 www.minneapolisfoundation.org The Inter-American Foundation 1331 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Suite 1200 North Washington, DC 20004 www.iaf.gov/es/ This Report was possible thanks to the generous support of the Building Broader Communities in the Americas Initiative, The Minneapolis Foundation and Fundación Comunidad, A.C. Cover photography: Los tikuanes de Xoxo, by Emanuel Deonicio Palma. Expert consulting: Dr. Ana Alicia Peña López, Faculty of Economics, National Autonomous University of Mexico. Editorial design and edition: Octavio Rosas Landa R. Translation from Spanish: Beatriz Álvarez Klein, Jana Schroeder, Pepe Osorio Gumá and Evelyn Arón. The English language translation was approved by Fundación Comunidad Morelos and BBCA Initiative. We thank the 6th semester Social Work students from the Social Studies Faculty at Temixco, Morelos, for making this project their own. They were in charge of the interviews in the state of Morelos, so this Report is also a result of their professional commitment. We thank Emanuel Deonicio Palma, from Yankuik Kuikamatilistli, for his creative inspiration and for granting permis- sion for the use of some of his photographic work in this Report.
    [Show full text]
  • “2006 Mexican Elections: a Challenge for Democracy”
    “2006 Mexican Elections: A Challenge for Democracy” Karla Lopez de Nava This coming July, Mexicans will not only have the chance to democratically elect a president, but more importantly, they will have the opportunity to endorse democracy. On July of 2000, Mexico had its first democratic elections after being ruled by a single party – PRI – for seventy one years. The question is not whether Mexico has transited to democracy, but rather, whether Mexicans—the government, the politicians, the media, civil society, and the citizens in general can sustain and consolidate the new democratic system. With the intent of shedding some light on this question, Mexicanos at Stanford University, the John S. Knight Fellowships for Professional Journalists, and Yost House organized the conference “2006 Mexican Elections: A Challenge for Democracy”. The event took place on Saturday March 11, 2006 in Stanford’s Kresge auditorium. The Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law, The Charles F. Riddell Fund - Yost House, the Center for Latin American Studies, VPUE/DOSA - New Student Initiatives, Bechtel International Center, El Guiding Concilio - El Centro Chicano, Camacho Fund, ASSU Speakers Bureau, and United Airlines were co-sponsors of the conference. The 2006 Mexican Elections conference proved to be wonderfully enriching for anyone with an interest in Mexican politics and/or in democratic consolidation. The conference consisted of three sections: a) a roundtable that discussed the role of the media in the 2006 electoral process; b) a keynote address given by one of the most 1 respected figures in Mexican academia, the historian and essayist Enrique Krauze, on the progress that Mexico has achieved in the political arena in the last decade, and on the challenges that Mexicans will face in the coming 2006 presidential election; and, c) a political debate between representatives of the three main political parties in Mexico – PRI, PAN and PRD.
    [Show full text]
  • Porfirismo During the Mexican Revolution
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2012-01-01 Porfirismo during the Mexican Revolution: Exile and the Politics of Representation, 1910-1920 Nancy Alexandra Aguirre University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the History Commons, Latin American Languages and Societies Commons, and the Latin American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Aguirre, Nancy Alexandra, "Porfirismo during the Mexican Revolution: Exile and the Politics of Representation, 1910-1920" (2012). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1773. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1773 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PORFIRISMO DURING THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION: EXILE AND THE POLITICS OF REPRESENTATION, 1910-1920 NANCY ALEXANDRA AGUIRRE Department of History APPROVED: Samuel Brunk, Ph.D., Chair Cheryl E. Martin, Ph.D. Sandra McGee Deutsch, Ph.D. Frank G. Pérez, Ph.D. Benjamin C. Flores, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Nancy Alexandra Aguirre 2012 PORFIRISMO DURING THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION: EXILE AND THE POLITICS OF REPRESENTATION, 1910-1920 by NANCY ALEXANDRA AGUIRRE, B.A., M.A. DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO December 2012 Acknowledgements Writing this dissertation has been a dream of mine since I found my passion for history as a seventh-grade Texas History student.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Information and Local Government's Electoral Returns, Evidence from an Information Dissemination Campaign in the Mexican
    Public Information and Local Government's Electoral Returns, Evidence from an Information Dissemination Campaign in the Mexican 2009 Municipal Elections Alberto Chong IADB Ana L. De La O Yale Dean Karlan Yale Leonard Wantchekron NYU Dear EGAP members: We originally intended to have some results ready for you, but the outcome data we received so far came in the most inconvenient format and it will take several weeks to clean it. On top of that, in the states we worked there are still several contested elections, thus, the outcome data we have so far is not the official one. In this document you will read about our research design. By the time of the EGAP meeting, all our interventions will be done. We welcome any type of feedback. -------------Please do not circulate this document.----------------- Public Information and Local Government's Electoral Returns, Evidence from an Information Dissemination Campaign in the Mexican 2009 Municipal Elections Abstract Despite optimistic views about fiscal decentralization in Mexico, local government's performance has remained poor. Scholarship and policy circles have suggested that lack of mechanisms of accountability, particularly no access to public information, prevents voters from voting out of office inefficient incumbent parties. Yet we know relatively little about the causal effect of information. We conducted an experiment to test if public information on local government’s expenditure influences voting behavior in three Mexican states: Jalisco, Morelos, and Tabasco. The experiment consisted of three different interventions. For the first intervention, we distributed a flyer with information on the total amount of money granted to the municipality through the largest infrastructure transfer scheme and the amount of the fund spent by the end of the fiscal year.
    [Show full text]
  • State Elections 2018 Election 2018 Governors
    STATE ELECTIONS 2018 ELECTION 2018 GOVERNORS INTRODUCTION In addition to the presidential elections and for the renewal of the Federal Congress, midterm elections were held in 30 entities of the country, in which 8 Governors, 27 Local Congresses, 1,596 City Councils, 16 City Halls and the Head of Government of Mexico City will be renewed. 8 1 8 Governors in: Head of • Chiapas Governors Government, • Guanajuato Mexico City • Jalisco 387 Local 585 Local • Morelos Deputies Deputies • Puebla (Proportional • Representation) (Relative Mayority) Tabasco • Veracruz • Yucatán 16 1596 Town Halls Municipalities Mexico City This electoral process will be characterized by the introduction of the reelection. Depending on the State, local deputies may be re-elected for four or two consecutive terms, which is equivalent to twelve and six years in office, respectively. The members of the City Councils: Municipal Presidents and Trustees, may be re-elected for an additional period only. Re-election for up to four periods: 4 consecutive • Baja California • Nayarit Re-election for up to two periods: 2 consecutive periods • Baja California Sur • Nuevo León • Campeche • Puebla • Aguascalientes • Chiapas • Querétaro • Chihuahua • Coahuila • San Luis Potosí • Colima • Ciudad de México • Sinaloa • Hidalgo • Durango • Sonora • Oaxaca • Guanajuato • Tabasco • Quintana Roo • Guerrero • Tlaxcala • Tamaulipas • Jalisco • Veracruz • Zacatecas • Estado de México • Yucatán • Michoacán • Morelos ELECTION 2018 GOVERNORS POLITICAL MAP (LOCAL GOVERNMENT REDISTRIBUTION) Political Map 2018 Current Political Map According to the election results, the distribution of local governments will be as follows: States in which will be transition in the party Currently, the States’ Governments are distributed among the Party 2015 2018 Dif.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans-Border Institute TBI Fact Sheet: Mexico’S 2006 Elections University of San Diego June 23, 2006
    Trans-Border Institute TBI Fact Sheet: Mexico’s 2006 Elections University of San Diego June 23, 2006 TBI Fact Sheet: Mexico’s 2006 Elections 2006 Elections in Mexico: Federal, State, and Local Races Seats for grabs in 2006: Electoral Calendar for 2006: • Presidency (6 year term of office) • March 12, 2006: Mexico State (PRI) • Senate (128 seats; 6 year terms) • July 2, 2006: Federal elections; State elections • Chamber of Deputies (500 seats; 3 year terms) in Campeche, Federal District, Guanajuato, • Governorships (6 year terms of office) Jalisco, Morelos, Nuevo León, Sonora, Tabasco • State Legislatures (3 year terms of office) • August 20, 2006: Chiapas • Municipalities (3 year terms of office) • October 15, 2006: Tabasco 2006 Major Parties and Presidential Candidates: PAN: Founded 1939. ♦ Felipe Calderón Hinojosa (PAN): Former-PAN party chairman (1996- Center-right; traditional 99). PAN Party Leader in Lower House of Congress (2000-2003) and ties to church & Energy Secretary under Fox (2003-04). Has never won a direct election business. for public office. PRD: Founded 1989. ♦ Andres Manuel López Obrador (PRD/PT/PC): Former PRI member, Comprises former PRI former-PRD party chairman. Head of Mexico City government (2000- & old leftist parties. 2005). Lost 1994 Tabasco gubernatorial election to Madrazo. Seen by Never won presidency. some as populist. PRI: Founded 1929. ♦ Roberto Madrazo Pintado (PRI/PVEM): Former-PRI party chairman Former-ruling party. (2001-2005), Federal Deputy (1976-79; 1991-94); Senator (1988-91). Won Varied ideological
    [Show full text]