DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF Version for Printing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Monday, November 29, 2004 Atrium Exhibit Shows Role Monday, November 29 of IT in Physics SAFER 2:30 p.m. Particle Astrophysics Seminar - Even the best of us make mistakes. Curia II Studies show that human beings make 5- Speaker: N. Gnedin, University of 7 mistakes an hour. Sometimes these Colorado mistakes are trivial and have little effect Title: Simulating Reionization: Yesterday, on what we are doing. At other times the Today, and Tomorrow consequences are more significant. 3:30 p.m. DIRECTOR'S COFFEE For example, over BREAK - 2nd Flr X-Over 77% of the 4:00 p.m. All Experimenters' Meeting - occurrences in DOE's John Urish setting up the sculpture Collision Curia II Occurrence Reporting Event (Click on image for larger version.) Processing System Straight back from its successful Tuesday, November 30 (ORPS) cite personnel 3:30 p.m. DIRECTOR'S COFFEE participation in the SC2004 error as a causal factor. Additionally, BREAK - 2nd Flr X-Over supercomputing trade fair in Pittsburgh, mistakes can occur because the 4:00 p.m. Accelerator Physics and the joint Fermilab/SLAC Computing the organization behind the employee has Technology Seminar - 1 West Quantum Universe exhibit is now on view created a situation that allows it to Speaker: P. Bauer, Fermilab in the Wilson Hall atrium. The exhibit happen. Title: Materials Research for shows how progress in information Superconducting RF Cavities at Fermilab technology is now indispensable to At Fermilab, we rely heavily on job particle physics research. planning and hazard analysis to identify and address ES&H hazards. By Monday, November 29 Computing the Quantum Universe is a six- approaching human performance as a Potato Au Gratin sided enclosure, with posters on the outer potential hazard in the workplace, Monte Cristo $4.75 walls, and flat-panel screens with mistakes can be avoided. Application of Savory Roasted Chicken Quarters $3.75 animated graphics in the center. The the SAFER method during job planning Lasagna Bolognaise $3.75 outer layer explains the nine great open and pre-job briefings can be helpful in this Chicken Ranch Wrapper $4.75 questions of particle physics -- as outlined area: Sausage Alfredo Pizza $2.75 in the Quantum Universe report, whose Szechuan Style Pork Lo Mein $4.75 graphics themes are also recalled -- and ● Summarize critical steps - What showcases the Fermilab and SLAC are the critical phases of the task? Wilson Hall Cafe Menu experiments that address those What parts of the task must Chez Leon questions. absolutely go right? ● Anticipate errors - How can we The center section has 24 screens, each make a mistake at each point? presenting a different facet of the Are there time pressures, unclear computing and networking efforts done by roles & responsibilities, imprecise the two labs and the collaborations they communications, interruptions, take part in. Among the featured projects personality conflicts, stresses, and themes, Lambda Station (a new assumptions, or complacency? Fermilab networking initiative), large- Chance Snow 40º/29º ● Foresee consequences - What is scale lattice QCD simulations, and a the worst thing that can go wrong Extended Forecast simulation of the Fermilab Booster beam. if a mistake is made at each Also prominent is Grid computing, which point? has now become a major theme at events Weather at Fermilab ● Evaluate defenses - What can we such as SC2004, and multidisciplinary do to prevent the mistake? Assure DOE SciDAC projects. sufficient schedule, have workers repeat back instructions, keep Secon Level 3 San Francisco artist Rob Newell's track of stop/start points, promote Collision Event, a glass-and-fiber-optic questioning attitudes, and have sculpture intermittently lit by blue light, others monitor activities. Search the Fermilab Today Archive crowns the booth with a psychedelic ● Review operating experience - touch. How has this been done in the past? What mistakes were made? A Computing Division team led by John How can we avoid them? Urish and Jeff Kallenbach worked with Fermilab Today is online at: SLAC to create the exhibit, and together http://www.fnal.gov/today/ Have a great day and let's work safely with Penelope Constanta and Ian Fisk, all week! Send comments and suggestions to they put in long hours last week setting it Safety Tip of the Week Archive [email protected] up in Wilson Hall. "It was a nice diversion," said Kallenbach, "and it's nice Fermilab Today archive to do stuff with SLAC." symmetry Email Notification Fermilab Today PDF Version Hard copies of the new issue of symmetry will be distributed later this week. To Fermilab Result of the Week archive receive an email notification with the table Fermilab Safety Tip of the Week archive of contents and links to online versions of all stories, please sign up. Linear Collider News archive Christmas Schooner, December 4 Fermilab Today classifieds The Fermilab Arts Series presents "The Subscribe/Unsubscribe to Fermilab Today Christmas Schooner," performed by the Robert Bacher, president of Universities Bailiwick Theater. Saturday, December 4, Research Association in the 1970s, passed 2004, at 8 p.m. in the Ramsey away on November 18. He was 99. After the Auditorium. Tickets - $20 ($10 for ages 18 war, Dr. Bacher served on the United States and under). For reservations call x2787. Atomic Energy Commission, and he became a professor of physics at Caltech in 1949. "He The Dawn of X-ray Astronomy, was certainly distinguished and right up with December 10 Rabi and Ramsey as a distinguished servant The Fermilab Lecture Series presents of the Government," said Fermilab physicist "The Dawn of X-ray Astronomy," Dick Carrigan. presented by 2002 Nobel Prize winner Riccardo Giacconi. Friday, December 10, 2004, at 8 p.m. in the Ramsey Auditorium. Tickets are $5. For reservations call x2787. From the New York Times, November 22, 2004 Wilson Hall Super Science Stocking Robert Bacher, Manhattan Project Stuffer Sale Physicist, Dies at 99 The Wilson Hall Super Science Stocking By Jeremy Pearce Stuffer Sale will be outside One West on Dr. Robert F. Bacher, a nuclear physicist December 1 and 2 from 10:00 am to 1:00 and one of the leaders of the Manhattan pm. Fermilab apparel, coffee mugs, Project, died on Thursday at a retirement keychains, science kits and more. home in Montecito, Calif. He was 99. Holiday Book Fair His death was announced by the Holiday Book Fair Fermilab's Recreation California Institute of Technology, where Office will sponsor its "Holiday" Book Fair, he had been a professor and provost. hosted by Books are Fun, in the Atrium Read more on Monday, November 29 from 10:00 AM until 6:00 PM and on Tuesday, November From the Fermilab History 30 from 7:00 AM until 3:00 PM. The Book and Archives Project Fair will accept cash, personal check, Robert Bacher, former president of MasterCard, Visa, American Express and Universities Research Association, was Discover card. A portion of the proceeds chairman of the lab's May 11, 1974 from the Book Fair subsidizes some of dedication program that changed the Recreation Office's Programs. laboratory's name from National Accelerator Laboratory to Fermi National 2005 Charitable Giving Campaign Accelerator Laboratory. Bacher met Fermilab employees have the opportunity Enrico Fermi in 1933 and 1936 at to contribute annually by payroll summer lectures for which Fermi traveled deduction to one, two or three IRS to the U.S. from Italy. Bacher recalled: "I approved charities of their choice. To remember catching up with [Fermi] as he participate, a contribution of at least started to swim across a lake at Ann $52.00 on an annual basis for one charity Arbor, to tell him that it was 1.5 miles or $78.00 for two or more can be pledged. across that lake, but Fermi kept on If you would like to participate in the swimming and went the whole distance. Charitable Giving Campaign in 2005, He was a great competitor and loved to employees must complete and return an win." enrollment form to payroll by December 1, read more 2004. For more information, contact Fermilab's Equal Opportunity Office at x3591, x4633 or x3415. Upcoming Classes December 13 - 17: Advanced Linux Administration December 14 & 15: Behavioral Interviewing (Talent Selection) two consecutive half-days January 10 - 14: Advanced Linux Administration more information Upcoming Activities .
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2013.Pdf

    Annual Report 2013.Pdf

    ATOMIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION Preserving & Interpreting Manhattan Project History & Legacy preserving history ANNUAL REPORT 2013 WHY WE SHOULD PRESERVE THE MANHATTAN PROJECT “The factories and bombs that Manhattan Project scientists, engineers, and workers built were physical objects that depended for their operation on physics, chemistry, metallurgy, and other nat- ural sciences, but their social reality - their meaning, if you will - was human, social, political....We preserve what we value of the physical past because it specifically embodies our social past....When we lose parts of our physical past, we lose parts of our common social past as well.” “The new knowledge of nuclear energy has undoubtedly limited national sovereignty and scaled down the destructiveness of war. If that’s not a good enough reason to work for and contribute to the Manhattan Project’s historic preservation, what would be? It’s certainly good enough for me.” ~Richard Rhodes, “Why We Should Preserve the Manhattan Project,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May/June 2006 Photographs clockwise from top: J. Robert Oppenheimer, General Leslie R. Groves pinning an award on Enrico Fermi, Leona Woods Marshall, the Alpha Racetrack at the Y-12 Plant, and the Bethe House on Bathtub Row. Front cover: A Bruggeman Ranch property. Back cover: Bronze statues by Susanne Vertel of J. Robert Oppenheimer and General Leslie Groves at Los Alamos. Table of Contents BOARD MEMBERS & ADVISORY COMMITTEE........3 Cindy Kelly, Dorothy and Clay Per- Letter from the President..........................................4
  • Trinity Site July 16, 1945

    Trinity Site July 16, 1945

    Trinity Site July 16, 1945 "The effects could well be called unprecedented, magnificent, beauti­ ful, stupendous, and terrifying. No man-made phenomenon of such tremendous power had ever occurred before. The lighting effects beggared description. The whole country was lighted by a searing light with the intensity many times that of the midday sun." Brig. Gen. Thomas Farrell A national historic landmark on White Sands Missile Range -- www.wsmr.army.mil Radiation Basics Radiation comes from the nucJeus of the gamma ray. This is a type of electromag­ individual atoms. Simple atoms like oxygen netic radiation like visible light, radio waves are very stable. Its nucleus has eight protons and X-rays. They travel at the speed of light. and eight neutrons and holds together well. It takes at least an inch of lead or eight The nucJeus of a complex atom like inches of concrete to stop them. uranium is not as stable. Uranium has 92 Finally, neutrons are also emitted by protons and 146 neutrons in its core. These some radioactive substances. Neutrons are unstable atoms tend to break down into very penetrating but are not as common in more stable, simpler forms. When this nature. Neutrons have the capability of happens the atom emits subatomic particles striking the nucleus of another atom and and gamma rays. This is where the word changing a stable atom into an unstable, and "radiation" comes from -- the atom radiates therefore, radioactive one. Neutrons emitted particles and rays. in nuc!ear reactors are contained in the Health physicists are concerned with reactor vessel or shielding and cause the four emissions from the nucleus of these vessel walls to become radioactive.
  • Character List

    Character List

    Character List - Bomb ​ Use this chart to help you keep track of the hundreds of names of physicists, freedom fighters, government officials, and others involved in the making of the atomic bomb. Scientists Political/Military Leaders Spies Robert Oppenheimer - Winston Churchill -- Prime Klaus Fuchs - physicist in ​ ​ ​ designed atomic bomb. He was Minister of England Manhattan Project who gave accused of spying. secrets to Russia Franklin D. Roosevelt -- ​ Albert Einstein - convinced President of the United States Harry Gold - spy and Courier ​ ​ U.S. government that they for Russia KGB. Narrator of the needed to research fission. Harry Truman -- President of story ​ the United States Enrico Fermi - created first Ruth Werner - Russian spy ​ ​ chain reaction Joseph Stalin -- dictator of the ​ Tell Hall -- physicist in Soviet Union ​ Igor Korchatov -- Russian Manhattan Project who gave ​ physicist in charge of designing Adolf Hitler -- dictator of secrets to Russia ​ bomb Germany Haakon Chevalier - friend who ​ Werner Reisenberg -- Leslie Groves -- Military approached Oppenheimer about ​ ​ German physicist in charge of leader of the Manhattan Project spying for Russia. He was designing bomb watched by the FBI, but he was not charged. Otto Hahn -- German physicist ​ who discovered fission Other scientists involved in the Manhattan Project: ​ Aage Niels Bohr George Kistiakowsky Joseph W. Kennedy Richard Feynman Arthur C. Wahl Frank Oppenheimer Joseph Rotblat Robert Bacher Arthur H. Compton Hans Bethe Karl T. Compton Robert Serber Charles Critchfield Harold Agnew Kenneth Bainbridge Robert Wilson Charles Thomas Harold Urey Leo James Rainwater Rudolf Pelerls Crawford Greenewalt Harold DeWolf Smyth Leo Szilard Samuel K. Allison Cyril S. Smith Herbert L. Anderson Luis Alvarez Samuel Goudsmit Edward Norris Isidor I.
  • J. Robert Oppenheimer

    J. Robert Oppenheimer

    Priscilla J. McMillan The Ruin of J. Robert Oppenheimer and the Birth of the Modern Arms Race VIKING VIKING Published by the Penguin Group Penguin Group (USA) Inc., 375 Hudson Street, New York, New York 100I4, U.S.A. Penguin Group (Canada), 10 Alcorn Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4V 3B2 (a division of Pearson Penguin Canada Inc.) Penguin Books Ltd, 80 Strand, London WC2R oRL, England Penguin Ireland, 25 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland (a division of Penguin Books Ltd) Penguin Books Australia Ltd, 250 Camberwell Road, Camberwell, Victoria 3124, Australia (a division of Pearson Australia Group Pry Ltd) Penguin Books India Pvt Lrd, II Community Centre, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi-no 0I7, India Penguin Group (NZ), Cnr Airborne and Rosedale Roads, Albany, Auckland 1310, New Zealand (a division of Pearson New Zealand Ltd) Penguin Books (South Africa) (Pry) Ltd, 24 Srurdee Avenue, Rosebank, Johannesburg 2196, South Africa Penguin Books Lrd, Registered Offices: 80 Strand, London WC2R oRL, England First published in 2005 by Viking Penguin, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc. 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Copyright © Priscilla Johnson McMillan, 2005 All rights reserved Photograph credits appear on page 374- LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA McMillan, Priscilla Johnson. The ruin of J. Robert Oppenheimer / Priscilla J. McMillan. p. ern. Includes index. ISBN 0-670-03422-3 I. Oppenheimer, J. Robert, 1904-1967. 2. Physicists-United States-Biography. 3. Manhattan Project (U.S.) 4- Atomic bomb-United States-s-History. 5. Nuclear physics- United States-Histoty-20th century. 6. Teller, Edward, 1908- I.
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: the PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S

    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: the PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S

    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 Vincent Jonathan Houghton, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Dissertation directed by: Professor Jon T. Sumida Department of History The subject of this dissertation is the U. S. atomic intelligence effort against both Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in the period 1942-1949. Both of these intelligence efforts operated within the framework of an entirely new field of intelligence: scientific intelligence. Because of the atomic bomb, for the first time in history a nation’s scientific resources – the abilities of its scientists, the state of its research institutions and laboratories, its scientific educational system – became a key consideration in assessing a potential national security threat. Considering how successfully the United States conducted the atomic intelligence effort against the Germans in the Second World War, why was the United States Government unable to create an effective atomic intelligence apparatus to monitor Soviet scientific and nuclear capabilities? Put another way, why did the effort against the Soviet Union fail so badly, so completely, in all potential metrics – collection, analysis, and dissemination? In addition, did the general assessment of German and Soviet science lead to particular assumptions about their abilities to produce nuclear weapons? How did this assessment affect American presuppositions regarding the German and Soviet strategic threats? Despite extensive historical work on atomic intelligence, the current historiography has not adequately addressed these questions. THE PRINCIPAL UNCERTAINTY: U.S. ATOMIC INTELLIGENCE, 1942-1949 By Vincent Jonathan Houghton Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2013 Advisory Committee: Professor Jon T.
  • Making the Bomb by John Lamperti

    Making the Bomb by John Lamperti

    November, 2012 Thoughts on Making the Bomb by John Lamperti I recently finished reading Martin Sherwin and Kai Bird’s monumental American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer.1 It's an admirable book, although I think the title might better have been American Faust. (No less than Freeman Dyson said Oppenheimer made a "Faustian bargain."2) There have been many books about Oppenheimer and the atomic bomb project in general; I've read some but not all of them. This one seems to be definitive. Everything we need to know is there – and it's a fascinating read. Two things struck me especially, and neither was directly about Oppenheimer. One was the ideological rigidity, and the blindness, of the crowd of Army and FBI "security" operatives who dogged Oppenheimer and the whole Manhattan Project from the beginning. To a man (no women are mentioned) they were obsessed with the pre-war leftist politics of many of the scientists, which they found highly suspicious and probably indicative of disloyalty. But while these agents were hounding leftists and "premature anti-fascists" (as supporters of the Spanish Republic were called) at Los Alamos and elsewhere and finding little or nothing, real spies were sending real scientific information to the USSR under their noses, apparently unsuspected. If the "security" people, especially Lt. Col. Boris Pash of Army Counter– Intelligence, had been given free rein, Oppenheimer and many others (but not the actual spies!) would have been banished from the Project and the "Trinity" test, as well as the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, might never have happened.
  • Physics, Physicists and the Bomb

    Physics, Physicists and the Bomb

    editorial Physics, physicists and the bomb Scientists involved in nuclear research before and after the end of the Second World War continue to be the subjects of historical and cultural fascination. Almost 70 years since Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the military, historical and moral implications of the nuclear bomb remain firmly lodged in the public’s consciousness. Images of mushroom clouds serve as powerful reminders of the destructive capability that countries armed with nuclear weapons have access to — a capability that continues to play a primary role in shaping the present geopolitical landscape of the world. For physicists, the development of the nuclear bomb generally brings up conflicting feelings. On the one hand, physicists played a central role in helping to create it; on the SCIENCE SOURCE/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY PHOTO SOURCE/SCIENCE SCIENCE other, they were also among the first to realize © its terrifying power. This contradiction is most Manhattan Project physicists at Los Alamos. From left to right: Kenneth Bainbridge, Joseph Hoffman, famously epitomized by Robert Oppenheimer, Robert Oppenheimer, Louis Hempelmann, Robert Bacher, Victor Weisskopf and Richard Dodson. the scientific director of the Manhattan Project, who, on witnessing the first test of the atomic bomb, the Trinity test, in July 1945, in this context that the public can truly come race following the Second World War, there was reminded of a quote from the Hindu to feel the growing sense of disillusionment is no question that Churchill was an early scripture Bhagavad Gita: “Now, I am become of those scientists as they realized their goal; and influential champion for government- Death, the destroyer of worlds.” a sense of lost innocence, that knowledge that sponsored science and technology in Britain.
  • William T. Golden October 1950 – April 1951

    William T. Golden October 1950 – April 1951

    Impacts of the Early Cold War on the Formulation of U.S. Science Policy Selected Memoranda of William T. Golden October 1950 – April 1951 Edited with an Appreciation by William A. Blanpied Foreward by Neal Lane Copyright © 1995, 2000 American Association for the Advancement of Science 1200 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20005 The findings, conclusions, and opinions stated or implied in this publication are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Directors, Council, or membership of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. William T. Golden Contents Contents Foreword....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Preface ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................ 7 A Brief Biography ........................................................................................................................................ 8 William T. Golden’s Chronicle of an Era: An Appreciation ....................................................................... 9 Decision Memorandum F.J. Lawton, Decision Memorandum for the President, October 19, 1950................................................ 34 Conversations: 1950 Herman
  • An Atomic History Chapter 2

    An Atomic History Chapter 2

    An Atomic History 0-3 8/11/02 7:31 AM Page 18 Chapter Two 19 THE FERMI-SZILARD PILE AND URANIUM RESEARCH The first government funding for nuclear research was allocated to purchase graphite and uranium oxide for the chain reaction experiments being organized by Fermi and World War II and the Manhattan Project Szilard at Columbia University in February 1940.2 This work, which began in New York 2 City, soon spread to Princeton, the University of Chicago, and research institutions in California.3 Even at this stage, the scientists knew that a chain reaction would need three major components in the right combination: fuel, moderator, and coolant. The fuel would contain the fissile material needed to support the fission process. The neutrons generated by the fission process had to be slowed by the moderator so that they could initiate addi- tional fission reactions. The heat that resulted from this process had to be removed by the coolant. Fermi’s initial research explored the possibility of a chain reaction with natural urani- The 1930s were a time of rapid progress in the development of nuclear physics. um. It was quickly determined that high-purity graphite served as the best neutron moder- Research accelerated in the early years of the Second World War, when new developments ator out of the materials then available.4 After extensive tests throughout 1940 and early were conceived and implemented in the midst of increasing wartime urgency. American 1941, Fermi and Szilard set up the first blocks of graphite at Columbia University in government interest in these developments was limited at first, but increased as the war September 1941.
  • TRIAL of OPPENHEIMER Eduard Roth

    TRIAL of OPPENHEIMER Eduard Roth

    15 October 2012 TRIAL OF OPPENHEIMER (Nuclear fantasy in 4 weeks) All characters are invented. Any similarity with historical events is purely incidental. Eduard Roth 1 Main characters LEWIS STRAUSS: Chairman of the AEC ROGER ROBB: Prosecutor ROBERT OPPENHEIMER: Defendant LLOYD GARRISON: Oppenheimer’s attorney GORDON GREY: Chairman of AEC Security Board G.GREY, T.MORGAN, W.EVANS: Members of the panel Oppenheimer’s witnesses: L.GROVES, K.GLENNAN, K.COMPTON, J.LANDSDALE, H.BETHE, G.DEAN, G.KENNAN, D.LILIENTHAL, J.CONANT, E.FERMI, N.RAMSAY, I.RABI, N.BRADBURY, W.WHITMAN, L.DUBRIDGE, V.BUSCH, R.BACHER, J.VON NEUMANN Prosecutor’s witnesses: L.ALVAREZ, K.PITZER, E.TELLER, R.WILSON, W.BORDEN, E.LAWRENCE All action takes place in room 2022 of AEC building, Washington D.C. AEC=Atomic Energy Commission. 2 Week 1 - day 1 (12 april 1954) (Enter Grey) Grey: I open these hearings by reading a letter from the AEC general man- ager, Kenneth Nichols, dating december 1953, mentioning requirements in the Atomic Energy Act of 1946, charging the commissioners to determine ‘character, associations and loyalty’ of individuals who work for the commis- sion and referring especially to section 10 of the Act that AEC employers do not endanger the common defense and security and requiring that indi- viduals be suspended if any information exists that employment would not be clearly consistent with the interests of national security. A panel will decide whether Dr. Oppenheimer can maintain his clearance or it has to be revoked. This panel is composed by myself, as chairman of the AEC Security Board, Thomas Morgan, industrialist, and Ward Evans, from the Chemistry Dpt.
  • Scientists and the Decision to Build the Superbomb, 1952-1954

    Scientists and the Decision to Build the Superbomb, 1952-1954

    In Any Light: Scientists and the Decision to Build the Superbomb, 1952-1954 Author(s): Peter Galison and Barton Bernstein Source: Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, Vol. 19, No. 2 (1989), pp. 267-347 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27757627 Accessed: 09-09-2019 20:44 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences This content downloaded from 206.253.207.235 on Mon, 09 Sep 2019 20:44:00 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms PETER GALISON* AND BARTON BERNSTEIN** In any light: Scientists and the decision to build the Superbomb, 1952-1954 If the development [of the hydrogen bomb] is possible, it is out of our powers to prevent it. All that we can do is to retard its completion by some years. I believe, on the other hand, that any form of international control may be put on a more stable basis by the knowledge of the full extent of the problem that must be solved and of the dangers of a ruth less international competition.
  • N Meeting in Baltimore on June 8, 2015 from 11:30AM-1PM

    N Meeting in Baltimore on June 8, 2015 from 11:30AM-1PM

    NMRO June 2015 From the NMRO President BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Dear Colleagues, This is the last Scintillator for this term as we prepare to welcome the new executive officers and board of director members who will begin their yearlong term following the annual NMRO luncheon meeting in Baltimore on June 8, 2015 from 11:30AM-1PM. This past year has been a productive one for Lida Jafari MD our group, and key changes have been made that I believe will set us up for further success in the Lida Jafari MD, the new representative to Alexander Antoniou, MD, International Affairs Committee of the ACNM, MA future. Since this is a resident-run organization, many of us eventually graduate and move on to join committees at both ACNM and/or is completing the second year of NM residency SNMMI. However, we remain pillars of support for the resident organization and in the program at Greater Los Angeles Veteran will always serve as “alumni”. This sense of community is part of what makes this Affairs/UCLA. Prior to nuclear medicine residency, a great organization to be a part of. Dr. Jafari completed a year of general surgery Below is a list of highlights of some of our accomplishments this past year: in the Yale affiliate, St Mary’s Medical Center, Connecticut. Dr. Jafari’s academic background • Education: Free case reviews (IMAIOS platform); board preparation included research in the physiology of tissue question bank (official release in June, 2015); 4-part MRI Webinar perfusion and the impact of negative pressure series; and new recommended reading list and updated online wound management.