Preview-Of-The-Deep-Sky-Imaging

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preview-Of-The-Deep-Sky-Imaging Welcome Thank you for downloading this sample of The Deep-sky Imaging Primer. The follow- ing pages will give you a sense of the book’s content and approach to teaching. I wrote this book to help you maximize your image quality, regardless of your ex- perience, equipment, or skies. There are many decisions to make as you get started: DSLR or CCD? Refractor or reflector? Which software? It’s a challenging road, but you can produce amazing images along the way, and I hope you’ll choose this book to help you make the best choices. If you’d like to purchase The Deep-sky Imaging Primer, you can buy it on Amazon. com or directly from me at http://digitalstars.wordpress.com. Thanks again for your interest in my book, and please feel free to reach out to me with your questions or comments at [email protected]. Best wishes, Charlie Bracken The Deep-sky Imaging Primer by Charles Bracken Copyright © 2013 Charles Bracken All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the author, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. Permission requests should be sent to the author at [email protected]. All trademarks used are the property of their respective owners. Printed in the United States of America ISBN-13: 978-1481804912 ISBN-10: 148180491X First Edition Contents Introduction v I. Understanding Images 13 1 Electronic sensors 14 The challenges of astronomical imaging 14 How electronic sensors work 14 Well capacity, gain, and dynamic range 16 The importance of bit depth 18 Response curves and raw files 18 Creating color images 20 Sensor architecture 21 2 Signal and Noise 23 Signal and noise at the pixel level 23 Shot Noise 24 An example of shot noise 26 Skyglow 29 Thermal signal, hot pixels, and dark frames 30 Read noise and quantization noise 32 Two-dimensional corrections 33 Sensor non-uniformity 33 Uneven illumination 33 Adding signals and noise 34 II. Aquiring Images 37 3 Mounts and alignment 38 Choosing and using a GEM 39 Meridian flip 39 Polar alignment 40 Tracking error 41 Drift alignment 42 4 Cameras 43 DSLRs 43 Dedicated astronomical cameras 43 Sensor size and pixel size 44 Connecting a camera to a telescope 44 5 Optics 46 Telescopes for visual vs. imaging use 47 vii Optical aberrations 47 Refractors 48 Telephoto lenses 50 Reflectors and compound telescopes 51 Telescope quality 54 6 Image scale: matching sensor, and optics 55 Resolution and seeing 55 Sampling 56 Oversampling revisited 58 Field of view 59 Equipment recommendations 60 Focal reducers and field flatteners 61 7 Choosing appropriate objects to image 64 Getting a sense of scale 64 The deep-sky catalogs 65 A survey of object sizes 66 Giant Objects (2° or greater) 66 Really Big Objects (1–2°) 67 Objects from 30-60' 67 Objects from 15-30' 67 Objects from 5-15' 67 Objects from 1-5' 68 Objects smaller than 1' 68 8 Focusing and autoguiding 69 Focusing 69 Achieving critical focus 70 Autoguiding fundamentals 71 Flexure 72 Connecting computer to mount 72 Software and settings 73 Choosing a scope and camera for autoguiding 75 9 Setup and accessories 76 Reducing setup time 76 Other important equipment 76 Dovetails, rings, and other mount accessories 77 Power supplies 77 Dew prevention 78 USB hubs and extension cables 78 10 Filters and narrowband imaging 79 Filters for imaging 79 Light pollution filters 82 11 Taking the exposures 83 Controlling the camera 83 Choosing exposure duration and gain 84 Planning for a night of imaging 85 An image capture workflow 86 Dark frames 87 viii Flat frames 88 Bias frames 89 Dithering light frames 89 12 Atmospheric effects 90 Light pollution 90 Target altitude 91 Local turbulence 93 13 Diagnosing problems and improving image quality 94 Wind or tracking errors 94 Mirror flop 94 Diffraction patterns 94 Focus 95 Halos 95 Tips for better image capture 96 III. Processing Images 99 14 Color in digital images 100 File formats 100 Visual response to color 100 Producing color on print and screen 101 Color management and color spaces 103 LAB color 103 The HSL/HSV/HSB color model 104 DSLR white balance 104 Deep-sky color accuracy 105 Color calibration with G2V stars 105 15 The calibration process 107 Calibration exposures 107 Stacking parameters 110 An example of calibration and stacking with DeepSkyStacker 111 Throwing out problem shots 114 Aligning monochrome images for color combination later 114 The drizzle algorithm 115 Diagnosing defects in calibration output 116 16 Principals and tools of post-processing 118 Selective adjustments 118 Understanding the histogram 118 The curves tool 121 Levels 123 The magic of layers 124 Layer blending modes 125 Layer masks 126 Creating a composite layer 126 Selections and feathering 127 A post-processing workflow 128 ix 17 Stretching: reallocating the dynamic range 129 Non-linear stretching 129 Start with balanced colors 130 Initial development 130 Object-background separation curves 131 Intra-object contrast curves 131 Controlling highlights and boosting saturation 133 Posterization: the perils of over-stretching 133 The effect of stretching on color 134 Digital Development Process (DDP) 135 18 Background adjustments and cosmetic repairs 136 Gradient removal 136 Repairing satellite trails, dust spots, and reflections 138 Correcting elongated stars 139 19 Color synthesis and adjustment 140 RGB Color Synthesis 140 Creating a luminosity channel 140 Narrowband RGB synthesis 141 Further hue adjustments 142 Using clipping layer masks to map color 143 Blending RGB and narrowband data 143 Color balance 144 Enhancing color saturation in RGB 144 Boosting saturation in LAB 145 20 Sharpening and local contrast enhancement 147 Convolution, deconvolution, and sharpening 147 Unsharp mask and local contrast enhancement 148 Selective application with layer masks 151 The high pass filter 151 Other ways to create local contrast 153 21 Star adjustments 155 Star removal and star selection 155 Reducing star size across the image 158 Reducing the brightest stars 159 Correcting star color in narrowband images 160 22 Noise reduction 162 Visual noise, color, and scale 162 Tools for noise reduction 162 Applying noise reduction selectively 163 23 Composition 165 Framing the scene 165 Orientation 165 Color 166 Walk away 166 24 DSLR Processing example: The Witch’s Broom Nebula 168 x 25 CCD Processing example: The Rosette Nebula in nar- rowband 175 A. Exercise Answers 185 B. Moonless hours 189 Index 195 xi Preview 1Understanding Images This first section briefly covers what’s going on “under the hood” in the electronic imaging process. Understanding how electronic images are cre- ated is uniquely important to long-exposure astronomical images. If you are math-phobic, don’t worry: the concepts are more important than the formulas. These ideas form the foundation of quality images, and we’ll come back to them again and again later as we explore equipment, image capture, and image processing. M31, The Andromeda Galaxy (18 10-minute luminance exposures combined with approximately 11 hours of color exposures) Preview 1 ELECTRONIC SENSORS The challenges of astronomical imaging How electronic sensors work Deep-sky objects include galaxies, nebulae, and star clus- Photons are the fundamental particles that carry light. The ters. Many are stunningly beautiful, and they range in job of the electronic sensors in cameras is to count photons, size from tiny planetary nebulae and distant galaxies only and their sensitivity is amazing. They can register a signal arcseconds across to gigantic nebulae larger than the full discriminate between brightness levels resulting from only moon. All of them, however, are dim, and this is the main a few photons. The individual sensor elements on a sensor challenge of creating deep-sky images. are referred to as photosites, each of which corresponds to a pixel in the final image. “Pixel” is short for picture element, When faced with a dimly lit outdoor scene, a daylight pho- and following the same logic, photosites are sometimes also tographer will use a faster focal ratio or take a longer expo- called sensels. Colloquially, most people ignore the distinc- sure. In our case, we’ll do both, but faster optics can only tion between a photosite and the resulting image pixel-a take us so far. The defining characteristic of deep-sky im- point on the image and a point on the sensor both com- aging is that we must take very long exposures. Instead of monly referred to as a pixel. measuring exposure times in fractions of a second, we will measure them in minutes. Further, we’ll synthesize many images together into one that incorporates hours of total exposure time. None of this was possible before electronic sensors and digital imaging revolutionized photography. The quality of deep-sky images has taken a quantum leap forward as a result, allowing amateurs to create images that were impos- sible in the film era. The process is not easy, however, as there are many chal- lenges to overcome. Aside from being very dim, the sky Figure 1. A typical CCD sensor rotates slowly over our heads, so we’ll require accurate tracking. We’ll also see that while daytime photography is There are several steps between photons striking the cam- relatively forgiving when it comes to optics, the night sky era’s sensor and the image file on your computer. Each (especially stars) seems designed to reveal even the slightest step is an opportunity for inaccuracy, known as noise in optical aberrations.
Recommended publications
  • Filter Performance Comparisons for Some Common Nebulae
    Filter Performance Comparisons For Some Common Nebulae By Dave Knisely Light Pollution and various “nebula” filters have been around since the late 1970’s, and amateurs have been using them ever since to bring out detail (and even some objects) which were difficult to impossible to see before in modest apertures. When I started using them in the early 1980’s, specific information about which filter might work on a given object (or even whether certain filters were useful at all) was often hard to come by. Even those accounts that were available often had incomplete or inaccurate information. Getting some observational experience with the Lumicon line of filters helped, but there were still some unanswered questions. I wondered how the various filters would rank on- average against each other for a large number of objects, and whether there was a “best overall” filter. In particular, I also wondered if the much-maligned H-Beta filter was useful on more objects than the two or three targets most often mentioned in publications. In the summer of 1999, I decided to begin some more comprehensive observations to try and answer these questions and determine how to best use these filters overall. I formulated a basic survey covering a moderate number of emission and planetary nebulae to obtain some statistics on filter performance to try to address the following questions: 1. How do the various filter types compare as to what (on average) they show on a given nebula? 2. Is there one overall “best” nebula filter which will work on the largest number of objects? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-AAAP-Photo-Contest
    2015 Kevin J. Brunelle Astrophotography Contest 15 photographers 91 images Atmospheric 10 photographers 20 images Matt Dieterich - Lenticular Clouds over Mt. Rainier Laura Quinn - Lightning Matt Dieterich - Rainier Sunset Laura Quinn - Pittsburgh Clouds Mike Christeson - Angelic Cloud Diane Yorkshire - Mountain Rainbow - Denali Mike Christeson - double rainbow Eric Fischer - Feathery Sundog Frank Wielgus - Scenic Sun and Sundog Eric Fischer - Solitary Ray Over Mingo Diane Yorkshire - Sitka Sunset Diane Yorkshire - Sunset - Inside Passage Len Marraccini - Atlantic Dawn Mike Christeson - Furnace sun set Rich McLaughlin - Morning Sunrise Sky Len Marraccini - Dawn's early rays Mike Christeson - Flowing river Sun Set Diane Yorkshire - Moon over Glacier Bay Julie Yorkshire - The Eclipse Begins from 35000 feet Mark Arelt - Summer Meteor Stellar 9 photographers 19 images Matt Dieterich - Aurora and Milky Way over Mt. Rainier Alexis Kwasinski - Pleiades and comet C2014 Q2 Lovejoy Matt Dieterich - Perseid Meteors and Milky Way over Mt. Rainier Chris Boretzky - Orion Constellation with M42 Mike Christeson- Good Morning Orion Mark McConaughy - Albireo Double Star Mark Arelt - Nocturnal Whirl Alexis Kwasinski - Milky Way Meteor two satellites and green and purple airglow Frank Wielgus - Cygnus Star Cloud Len Marraccini - Milky Way over Bodie Island Nathan Brandt - Milky Way Star Party Frank Wielgus - Brocchi's Cluster Nathan Brandt - Cluster NGC 7686 Mark McConaughy - M13 Globular Cluster Frank Wielgus - Gamma Cassiopeiae and Stellar Friends Nathan
    [Show full text]
  • Rotating Elephant Trunks
    A&A 454, 201–212 (2006) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054494 & c ESO 2006 Astrophysics Rotating elephant trunks G. F. Gahm1,P.Carlqvist2,L.E.B.Johansson3,andS.Nikolic´4,5 1 Stockholm Observatory, AlbaNova University Centre, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden e-mail: [email protected] 2 Alfvén Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden 3 Onsala Space Observatory, 439 92 Onsala, Sweden 4 Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36D, Santiago, Chile 5 Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro Received 8 November 2005 / Accepted 26 January 2006 ABSTRACT Aims. We investigate the structure and velocity of cold molecular pillars, “elephant trunks”, in expanding H ii regions. Methods. The trunks are seen in silhouette against the bright background in our Hα images. All trunks are filamentary, and show signs of being twisted. Four such trunks in NGC 7822, IC 1805, the Rosette Nebula, and DWB 44 were selected, and then mapped mainly in 12CO and 13CO. We determine the mass and density of the trunks. Most of the mass is concentrated in a head facing the central cluster, and in sub-filaments forming the body of the trunk that is connected to V-shaped filaments to the outer expanding shell. Results. We discovered that all four trunks rotate as rigid bodies (to a first approximation) about their major axes, and that at least two trunks are stretching along their major axes, meaning that the massive heads are lagging behind in the general expansion of the H ii regions. The rotational periods are of the order of a few million years – similar to the age of the clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • WISE Captures a Cosmic Rose 16 March 2010
    WISE Captures a Cosmic Rose 16 March 2010 supernova remnant associated with this region, called NGC 7822, indicates that a massive star has already exploded, blowing the cloud open in a "champagne flow" and leaving behind this floral remnant. Blue dots sprinkled throughout are foreground stars in our Milky Way galaxy. Berkeley 59 and NGC 7822 are located in the constellation of Cepheus at a distance of about 3,300 light-years from Earth. Infrared light is color coded in this picture as follows: blue shows 3.4-micron light; cyan, 4.6-micron light; green, 12-micron light; and red, 22-micron light. A new infrared image from NASA's Wide-field Infrared Provided by JPL/NASA Survey Explorer, or WISE, shows a cosmic rosebud blossoming with new stars. Image credit: NASA/JPL- Caltech/UCLA (PhysOrg.com) -- A new infrared image from NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, or WISE, shows a cosmic rosebud blossoming with new stars. The stars, called the Berkeley 59 cluster, are the blue dots to the right of the image center. They are ripening out of the dust cloud from which they formed, and at just a few million years old, are young on stellar time scales. The rosebud-like red glow surrounding the hot, young stars is warm dust heated by the stars. Green "leafy" nebulosity enfolds the cluster, showing the edges of the dense, dusty cloud. This green material is from heated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, molecules that can be found on Earth in barbecue pits, exhaust pipes and other places where combustion has occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy Magazine Special Issue
    γ ι ζ γ δ α κ β κ ε γ β ρ ε ζ υ α φ ψ ω χ α π χ φ γ ω ο ι δ κ α ξ υ λ τ μ β α σ θ ε β σ δ γ ψ λ ω σ η ν θ Aι must-have for all stargazers η δ μ NEW EDITION! ζ λ β ε η κ NGC 6664 NGC 6539 ε τ μ NGC 6712 α υ δ ζ M26 ν NGC 6649 ψ Struve 2325 ζ ξ ATLAS χ α NGC 6604 ξ ο ν ν SCUTUM M16 of the γ SERP β NGC 6605 γ V450 ξ η υ η NGC 6645 M17 φ θ M18 ζ ρ ρ1 π Barnard 92 ο χ σ M25 M24 STARS M23 ν β κ All-in-one introduction ALL NEW MAPS WITH: to the night sky 42,000 more stars (87,000 plotted down to magnitude 8.5) AND 150+ more deep-sky objects (more than 1,200 total) The Eagle Nebula (M16) combines a dark nebula and a star cluster. In 100+ this intense region of star formation, “pillars” form at the boundaries spectacular between hot and cold gas. You’ll find this object on Map 14, a celestial portion of which lies above. photos PLUS: How to observe star clusters, nebulae, and galaxies AS2-CV0610.indd 1 6/10/10 4:17 PM NEW EDITION! AtlAs Tour the night sky of the The staff of Astronomy magazine decided to This atlas presents produce its first star atlas in 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Übersicht NGC-Objektauswahl Cepheus Zur Übersichtskarte
    NGC-Objektauswahl Cepheus NGC 40 NGC 7055 NGC 7354 NGC 188 NGC 7076 NGC 7380 NGC 1184 NGC 7129 NGC 7419 NGC 1544 NGC 7139 NGC 7423 NGC 2276 NGC 7142 NGC 7429 NGC 2300 NGC 7160 NGC 7510 NGC 6939 NGC 7226 NGC 7538 NGC 6949 NGC 7235 NGC 7708 NGC 6951 NGC 7261 NGC 7762 NGC 7023 NGC 7281 NGC 7822 Sternbild- Übersicht Zur Objektauswahl: Nummer anklicken Zur Übersichtskarte: Objekt anklicken Sternbildübersicht Auswahl NGC 40_7708 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 188_Aufsuchkarte 2 UMi 2 Auswahl NGC 1184 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 1544_2276_2300 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 6939 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 6949_6951 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 7023 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 7055 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 7076 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 7129_7142 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 7139_7160 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 7226_7235 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl N 7261_7281 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 7354_7419_7429_7510_7538 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 7380_7423 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 7762_7822 Aufsuchkarte Auswahl NGC 40 Übersichtskarte Aufsuch- Auswahl karte NGC 188 Übersichtskarte Aufsuch- Auswahl karte NGC 1184 Übersichtskarte Aufsuch- Auswahl karte NGC 1544 Übersichtskarte Aufsuch- Auswahl karte N 2276_N 2300 Übersichtskarte Aufsuch- Auswahl karte NGC 6939 Übersichtskarte Aufsuch- Auswahl karte NGC 6949 Übersichtskarte Aufsuch- Auswahl karte NGC 6951 Übersichtskarte Aufsuch- Auswahl karte NGC 7023 Übersichtskarte Aufsuch- Auswahl karte NGC 7055 Übersichtskarte Aufsuch- Auswahl karte NGC 7076 Übersichtskarte Aufsuch- Auswahl karte NGC 7129_7142 Übersichtskarte Aufsuch- Auswahl karte NGC 7139
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Spring VAS Newsletter
    Morning Star Spring 2018 Contents Every 2 years and 50 days, Mars and New Members ____________Pg 1 New Members Earth have "close encounters" with Meetings ________________ Pg 1-3 each other. Approximately every 15.7 Apr 2 Mars - Summer Viewing 2018 VAS welcomes the following new years, Mars has a closer than typical ap- May 7 Annual Banquet & Business Meeting member who joined us since the last proach to Earth. In the summer of June 4 A Tale of Two Observatories newsletter: 2018 Mars will have one of these closer Events ___________________Pg 2-3 Robert Diehl approaches called a Perihelic Opposi- -VAS Events Maura Kelley tion (described in more detail in the - Public Star Gazing Larry Dallamura talk). At that time, amateur size tele- - GMAAA Events Ron Russotti scopes will have some reasonable views Articles __________________ Pg 3-5 Dana DeWitt of Martian surface features. Mars is the - NASA’s Space Place Article Sandra Romero Diez only planet in our Solar System (besides - M33 Earth of course) that we have a reason- - NGC 7822/Ced 214 Meetings/Presentations able chance of seeing the actual surface Board Talk ____________ Pg 5-8 features (the Moon doesn't count- it's a moon). Several major Martian surface - Board Minutes Meetings are held the first (non-holi- - Committee Updates features are readily visible in a good day) Monday of the month, at 7:30 P.M. telescope. Mars is a dynamic planet Observer’s Page _________Pg 8-14 in the Kolvoord Community Room of - The Super-Moon, Blue-Moon, Total with surface features that show subtle the Brownell Library, 6 Lincoln St., changes over time due to the effects of Eclipse of the Moon Essex Jct (2nd building north of Essex - Asteroid News the Martian atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Observer's Handbook 1989
    OBSERVER’S HANDBOOK 1 9 8 9 EDITOR: ROY L. BISHOP THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA CONTRIBUTORS AND ADVISORS Alan H. B atten, Dominion Astrophysical Observatory, 5071 W . Saanich Road, Victoria, BC, Canada V8X 4M6 (The Nearest Stars). L a r r y D. B o g a n , Department of Physics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, Canada B0P 1X0 (Configurations of Saturn’s Satellites). Terence Dickinson, Yarker, ON, Canada K0K 3N0 (The Planets). D a v id W. D u n h a m , International Occultation Timing Association, 7006 Megan Lane, Greenbelt, MD 20770, U.S.A. (Lunar and Planetary Occultations). A lan Dyer, A lister Ling, Edmonton Space Sciences Centre, 11211-142 St., Edmonton, AB, Canada T5M 4A1 (Messier Catalogue, Deep-Sky Objects). Fred Espenak, Planetary Systems Branch, NASA-Goddard Space Flight Centre, Greenbelt, MD, U.S.A. 20771 (Eclipses and Transits). M a r ie F i d l e r , 23 Lyndale Dr., Willowdale, ON, Canada M2N 2X9 (Observatories and Planetaria). Victor Gaizauskas, J. W. D e a n , Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, National Research Council, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0R6 (Solar Activity). R o b e r t F. G a r r i s o n , David Dunlap Observatory, University of Toronto, Box 360, Richmond Hill, ON, Canada L4C 4Y6 (The Brightest Stars). Ian H alliday, Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, National Research Council, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0R6 (Miscellaneous Astronomical Data). W illiam H erbst, Van Vleck Observatory, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, U.S.A. 06457 (Galactic Nebulae). Ja m e s T. H im e r, 339 Woodside Bay S.W., Calgary, AB, Canada, T2W 3K9 (Galaxies).
    [Show full text]
  • Longmont Astronomical Society March 2019 Newsletter
    Longmont Astronomical Society March 2019 Newsletter Vol. 33 No. 3 - ISSN 2641-8886 (web) - ISSN 2641-8908 (print) - March 2019 LAS Meeting - March 21 at 7pm - IHop Astrophotography Excursion to San Pedro de Atacama Celestial Explorations Pipe Bowl Dark Nebula area in Milky Way taken from San Pedro de Atacama, Chile in October 2018 by Stephen Garretson using Canon 70-200mm Zoom at 115mm Canon 6D on iOptron SkyGuider Pro We describe the trip to Chile by Stephen, MJ, Tally and David in October of 2018. We present the travel, activities at the Atacama Lodge, our tours of local attractions including ALMA, and show off astro-photographs we were able to record from 63° south of Boulder. Notes from the President: Bill Tschumy Our February monthly meeting was a bit chaotic. IHOP bumped us from our normal room because of anoth- er meeting there on the same night. I appreciate everyone’s making the best of a bad situation. Of course, this had to happen on the night of a popular speaker, John Bally. We are actively looking for alternate loca- tions for the meetings since IHOP is becoming less and less workable for us. I hope that many of you can make the March 16th public star party at Rabbit Mountain. We need to show Boulder County Parks and Open Space that we can be counted on to put on a good show for them. The other big thing on the Board’s plate is figuring out our move to a new web site platform. We’ve looked at a few options but, as usual, nothing seems perfect for us.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event Golden Gate Invitational
    Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event Golden Gate Invitational University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA January 27, 2018 Team Number: Team Name: Instructions: 1) Please turn in all materials at the end of the event. 2) Do not forget to put your team name and team number at the top of all answer pages. 3) Write all answers on the lines on the answer pages. Any marks elsewhere will not be scored. 4) Do not worry about significant figures. Use 3 or more in your answers, regardless of how many are in the question. 5) Please do not access the internet during the event. If you do so, your team will be disqualified. 6) Feel free to take apart the test and staple it back together at the end! 7) Good luck! And may the stars be with you! 1 Section A: Use Image/Illustration Sets A and B to answer Questions 1-18. Each sub- question in this section is worth one point. 1. DEM L241 is a supernova remnant in the Large Magellanic Cloud. (a) Which image depicts this object? (b) Research has indicated the presence of mass loss from a massive star within DEM L241 directed towards a highly compact companion. Why is this significant? 2. Image 7 depicts an object's brightness over time. (a) Which object's behavior is represented by this image? (b) What is significant about this particular object relative to others in this galaxy? 3. Regarding objects of the same type as the object in Question 2a-2b: (a) What is the general classification of this kind of object? (b) What other object(s) fall under this classification? Give name(s) and image number(s).
    [Show full text]
  • National Radio Astronomy Observatory
    C ,: dm NATIONAL RADIO ASTRONOMY OBSERVATORY QUARTERLY REPORT January 1, 1995 - March 30, 1995 ' 4r.3 < . G k ,, i7. i 1 c 4 i .. TABLE OF CONTENTS A. TELESCOPE USAGE .............................................................. 1 B. 140 FOOT TELESCOPE ............................................................ 1 C. 12METERTELESCOPE .................. ......... 3 D. VERY LARGE ARRAY ............................................................ 6 E. VERY LONG BASELINE ARRAY................................................... 15 F. SCIENTIFIC HIGHLIGHTS ......................................................... 17 G. PUBLICATIONS ................................................................ 19 H. CHARLOTTESVILLE ELECTRONICS................................................ 19 I. GREEN BANK ELECTRONICS ...................................................... 20 J. TUCSON ELECTRONICS .......................................................... 21 K. SOCORRO ELECTRONICS ........................................................ 21 L. OBSERVATORY COMPUTING AND AIPS ............................................ 23 M. AIPS++ ......................................................................... 24 N. SOCORRO COMPUTING ......................................................... 24 0. VLBA OPERATIONAL STATUS .................................................... 26 P. GREEN BANK TELESCOPE PROJECT ........... .................................... 26 Q. PERSONNEL.......... ......................................................... 28 Appendix A. Preprints
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement C
    SJS PD Group Project Examples Group 1 Red Stars Blue Stars Yellow Stars What can we learn about star clusters by comparing individual stars through different filters? Let's compare globular clusters and open clusters. Hypothesis: Globular clusters are old. They will contain more red stars (that is stars that are older) than blue stars. Open clusters will not follow this trend. Visual inspection will be reasonably reliable in determining “old or young” clusters. Method § Select 1 Open Cluster and 1 Globular Cluster each. § Set up each Optical Observation on a telescope with 3 different color filters. § Using Astro Image, produce color images. Visually identify any prominent star color trends. § Verify visual determination of selected Red, Yellow and/or Blue Stars by photometer measurements in Afterglow. ú Record Flux in each of the 3 stars for each filter. ú Compare Photometer Flux results for each star to the color image to see if flux results match the color determinations made from visual inspection. § Record Star Cluster approximate ages to determine if the dominantly observed star color correlates correctly to our predictions based on star flux and color. Open Cluster Data Source/ Selected Star Visual Color GenB GenG GenR Does our visual identification Age Coordinates Observation Star Star Star match the flux readings? of Star Flux Flux Flux M44 - 1: 466.49,573.49 Yellow 5,877,071 6,160,753 6,714,667 More red than yellow. 650 Million 2: 786.51,244.45 Yellow 5,193,411 5,744,836 6,148,554 More red than yellow. Mostly blue 3: 510.17,218.92 Blue 4,046,350 3,451,030 2,671,442 Confirmed cluster.
    [Show full text]