DOCSLIB.ORG

Dave Knisely's Filter Performance Comparisons for Some Common Nebulae Quick Reference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dave Knisely's Filter Performance Comparisons for Some Common Nebulae Quick Reference Dave Knisely's Filter Performance Comparisons For Some Common Nebulae Quick Reference Ref Name DEEP-SKY UHC OIII H-BETA Recommendation M1 CRAB NEBULA 3 4 3 0 UHC/DEEP-SKY (H-beta *not* recommended) M8 LAGOON NEBULA 3 5 5 2 UHC/OIII M16 EAGLE NEBULA 2 4 4 2 UHC/OIII, but H-BETA hurts the view M17 SWAN (OMEGA) NEBULA 3 4 5 1 OIII/UHC (H-BETA not recommended) M20 TRIFID NEBULA 2 4 3 4 UHC/H-BETA M27 DUMBELL NEBULA 3 5 4 1 UHC (OIII also useful in showing some inner detail, but H-BETA is NOT recommended) M42 GREAT ORION NEBULA 3 5 4 3 UHC/OIII (near-tie) M43 North part of Great Orion Nebula 3 3 2 4 H-BETA (UHC and Deep-Sky also help) M57 RING NEBULA 2 4 4 0 UHC/OIII (H-BETA is NOT recommended!) M76 “MINI-DUMBELL” or BUTTERFLY NEBULA 2 4 3 0 UHC/OIII (H-BETA NOT recommended!) M97 OWL NEBULA 2 4 5 0 OIII/UHC (H-beta *not* recommended) NGC 40 3 3 2 2 DEEP-SKY/UHC (near tie) NGC 246 2 3 4 0 OIII/UHC. (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 281 3 4 4 2 UHC/OIII. NGC 604 HII region in galaxy M33 in Triangulum 2 3 4 2 OIII/UHC NGC 896/IC 1795 “Heart” nebula 3 4 4 1 UHC/OIII (H-beta *not* recommended) NGC 1360 2 4 4 0 OIII/UHC (H-beta *not* recommended) NGC 1491 3 5 4 0 UHC/OIII (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 1499 CALIFORNIA NEBULA 2 2 1 4 H-BETA NGC 1514 CRYSTAL-BALL NEBULA 2 4 4 0 OIII/UHC (H-Beta NOT recommended) NGC 1999 2 1 1 1 DEEP-SKY NGC 2022 3 4 5 0 OIII/UHC (H-Beta NOT recommended) NGC 2024 FLAME NEBULA 3 3 2 1 DEEP-SKY/UHC (near tie) NGC 2174 2 4 4 0 UHC/OIII (near tie) (H-Beta NOT recommended) NGC 2327 2 3 2 4 H-BETA/UHC NGC 2237-9 ROSETTE NEBULA 2 5 5 1 UHC/OIII NGC 2264 CONE NEBULA 2 3 2 1 UHC (other filters may be more useful in larger apertures) NGC 2359 THOR’S HELMET 2 4 5 0 OIII/UHC (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 2346 2 3 3 0 UHC/OIII (near tie) (H-beta *not* recommended) NGC 2438 2 3 4 0 OIII (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 2371-2 2 4 4 0 OIII/UHC (near tie) (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 2392 ESKIMO NEBULA 2 4 4 0 OIII/UHC. (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 2440 2 4 4 0 UHC/OIII (near tie) (H-Beta not recommended) NGC 3242 GHOST OF JUPITER 2 4 4 1 UHC/OIII (near tie) (H-Beta not recommended) NGC 4361 2 4 4 0 UHC/OIII (near tie), (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 6210 2 4 4 1 OIII/UHC (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 6302 BUG NEBULA 2 3 3 0 OIII/UHC (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 6334 2 4 3 3 UHC (OIII and H-beta also useful) NGC 6445 2 4 3 0 UHC/OIII (H-beta *not* recommended) NGC 6357 2 3 4 1 OIII/UHC (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 6543 CAT’S EYE 2 4 4 1 OIII/UHC (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 6559 2 4 2 2 UHC NGC 6781 3 4 4 0 OIII/UHC (H-beta *not* recommended) NGC 6804 2 3 4 0 OIII/UHC (H-beta *not* recommended) NGC 6888 CRESCENT NEBULA 2 4 5 1 OIII/UHC (near tie). H-beta *not* recommended!) NGC 6905 the Blue Flash” planetary Nebula 3 4 4 1 UHC (H-beta *not* recommended) NGC 6960-95 VEIL NEBULA 3 4 5 1 OIII/UHC (OIII is somewhat better but H-BETA is NOT recommended) NGC 7000 NORTH AMERICAN NEBULA 2 4 4 3 OIII/UHC (near tie) but both H-BETA and DEEP-SKY are useful on the objec NGC 7008 2 4 4 0 OIII/UHC (H-Beta *not* recommended!) NGC 7009 SATURN NEBULA 2 4 4 1 Filters are not needed, but OIII/UHC will help bring out the fainter detail (H-BETA not recommended) NGC 7023 3 2 2 1 DEEP-SKY NGC 7026 2 3 3 0 OIII/UHC *near tie* (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 7027 2 4 4 0 OIII/UHC *near tie* (H-BETA not recommended!) NGC 7048 2 3 4 0 OIII/UHC (H-Beta *not* recommended!) NGC 7129-33 2 3 3 1 UHC/OIII NGC 7139 2 3 4 0 OIII/UHC (H-Beta *not* recommended) NGC 7293 GIANT HELICAL NEBULA 2 4 5 0 OIII/UHC (H-beta NOT recommended) NGC 7538 3 4 4 0 UHC/OIII (H-beta NOT recommended) NGC 7635 BUBBLE NEBULA 2 4 4 3 OIII/UHC NGC 7662 BLUE SNOWBALL 2 3 3 1 Filters are not really needed, but UHC/OIII may help with locating it at low power via “blinking” (H-BETA is not recommended) NGC 7822 2 3 2 2 UHC (H-Beta and OIII also useful) IC 405 FLAMING STAR NEBULA 2 3 2 4 H-BETA IC 410 Nebula assoc. with NGC 1893 2 4 4 0 OIII/UHC. (H-beta *not* recommended) IC 417 2 3 3 4 H-BETA/UHC IC 434 HORSEHEAD NEBULA 2 3 0 4 Lumicon H-BETA (UHC also helps, but OIII not recommended). IC 443 1 4 3 2 UHC IC 1283 2 3 3 4 H-Beta IC 1318 GAMMA CYGNI NEBULA 2 3 1 4 H-BETA/UHC (OIII *not* recommended) IC 1396 2 4 3 1 UHC IC 1848 The Baby Nebula 2 4 4 1 UHC (H-beta *not* recommended) IC 2177 Seagull Nebula 2 3 2 3 H-BETA/UHC IC 5067-70 PELICAN NEBULA 2 4 4 3 UHC/OIII, Deep-sky also useful on the object (UHC was brighter, but OIII shows more detail) IC 5076 2 2 2 3 H-Beta IC 5146 THE COCCOON NEBULA 2 3 1 3 H-BETA/UHC *near tie* (OIII not recommended). PK64+5.1 CAMPBELL’S HYDROGEN STAR 2 3 2 4 H-BETA (UHC also useful) PK205+14.1 MEDUSA NEBULA 2 3 4 0 OIII/UHC *near tie* (H-beta *not* recommended) PK164+31.1 HEADPHONE NEBULA 2 3 3 0 UHC/OIII *near tie* (H-beta *not* recommended) Sh2-13 2 4 2 2 UHC Sh2-54 2 4 2 3 UHC Sh2-84 1 3 1 2 UHC Sh2-101 2 3 2 3 UHC/H-BETA Sh2-112 3 4 4 1 OIII/UHC (H-beta not recommended) Sh2-132 2 4 4 3 OIII/UHC (near tie) Sh2-155 2 1 1 0 DEEP-SKY (probable reflection nebula). Sh2-157 “fingers” diffuse nebula 2 3 3 2 UHC/OIII Sh2-170 2 3 2 2 UHC Sh2-171 2 3 2 2 UHC (Deep-Sky and OIII filters also useful) Sh2-235 3 3 2 4 H-BETA/DEEP-SKY (UHC also helps.) Sh2-261 2 3 3 2 UHC/OIII (near tie) Sh2-276 BARNARD’S LOOP 1 2 0 3 H-BETA/UHC. (OIII not recommended) Sh2-254-5-6-7-8 2 3 2 3 H-BETA/UHC (near tie) Sh2-311 3 4 3 0 UHC/Deep-Sky (H-Beta not recommended) vdB93 Gum-1 2 3 1 4 H-BETA/UHC (OIII not recommended) Source: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org/filter-performance-comparisons-for-some-common-nebulae/.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Filter Performance Comparisons for Some Common Nebulae
    Filter Performance Comparisons For Some Common Nebulae By Dave Knisely Light Pollution and various “nebula” filters have been around since the late 1970’s, and amateurs have been using them ever since to bring out detail (and even some objects) which were difficult to impossible to see before in modest apertures. When I started using them in the early 1980’s, specific information about which filter might work on a given object (or even whether certain filters were useful at all) was often hard to come by. Even those accounts that were available often had incomplete or inaccurate information. Getting some observational experience with the Lumicon line of filters helped, but there were still some unanswered questions. I wondered how the various filters would rank on- average against each other for a large number of objects, and whether there was a “best overall” filter. In particular, I also wondered if the much-maligned H-Beta filter was useful on more objects than the two or three targets most often mentioned in publications. In the summer of 1999, I decided to begin some more comprehensive observations to try and answer these questions and determine how to best use these filters overall. I formulated a basic survey covering a moderate number of emission and planetary nebulae to obtain some statistics on filter performance to try to address the following questions: 1. How do the various filter types compare as to what (on average) they show on a given nebula? 2. Is there one overall “best” nebula filter which will work on the largest number of objects? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Messier Objects
    Messier Objects From the Stocker Astroscience Center at Florida International University Miami Florida The Messier Project Main contributors: • Daniel Puentes • Steven Revesz • Bobby Martinez Charles Messier • Gabriel Salazar • Riya Gandhi • Dr. James Webb – Director, Stocker Astroscience center • All images reduced and combined using MIRA image processing software. (Mirametrics) What are Messier Objects? • Messier objects are a list of astronomical sources compiled by Charles Messier, an 18th and early 19th century astronomer. He created a list of distracting objects to avoid while comet hunting. This list now contains over 110 objects, many of which are the most famous astronomical bodies known. The list contains planetary nebula, star clusters, and other galaxies. - Bobby Martinez The Telescope The telescope used to take these images is an Astronomical Consultants and Equipment (ACE) 24- inch (0.61-meter) Ritchey-Chretien reflecting telescope. It has a focal ratio of F6.2 and is supported on a structure independent of the building that houses it. It is equipped with a Finger Lakes 1kx1k CCD camera cooled to -30o C at the Cassegrain focus. It is equipped with dual filter wheels, the first containing UBVRI scientific filters and the second RGBL color filters. Messier 1 Found 6,500 light years away in the constellation of Taurus, the Crab Nebula (known as M1) is a supernova remnant. The original supernova that formed the crab nebula was observed by Chinese, Japanese and Arab astronomers in 1054 AD as an incredibly bright “Guest star” which was visible for over twenty-two months. The supernova that produced the Crab Nebula is thought to have been an evolved star roughly ten times more massive than the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2020 Page 1 of 11
    Pretoria Centre ASSA April 2020 Page 1 of 11 NEWSLETTER APRIL 2020 Dear member In the light of the current situation and based upon advice from a virologist at one of the leading pathology laboratories, we regret to have to cancel the March and April viewing evenings and meetings of the Pretoria Centre of ASSA. The situation will be reviewed in time for the May activities and members will be informed of any changes. This decision was not taken lightly, but we believe the health of our members is important and we would not like to be the reason one of our members should fall victim to the virus. We apologize for the inconvenience and trust the skies will be clear wherever you wish to spend time under the stars. Bosman Olivier Chairman TABLE OF CONTENTS Astronomy-related articles on the Internet 2 Astronomy basics: Galaxies 3 Feature of the month: Biggest explosion seen since the Big Bang 3 Astronomy-related images and video clips on the Internet 3 Astronomy basics: Galaxies 3 Observing: A different star cluster - by Magda Streicher 4 NOTICE BOARD 5 Pretoria Centre committee 5 Open Star Clusters with Superimposed Planetary Nebulae: 6 M46/NGC 2438 and NGC 2818/2818A Pretoria Centre ASSA April 2020 Page 2 of 11 Astronomy-related articles on the Internet Is bright Comet ATLAS disintegrating? https://earthsky.org/space/how-to-see-bright- comet-c-2019-y4-atlas?utm_source=EarthSky+News&utm_campaign=11f7198ca6- EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_02_02_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c64394 5d79-11f7198ca6-394671529 Meet the giant exoplanet where it rains iron. The temperatures on the day side of giant exoplanet WASP-76b are scorching, high enough for metals to be vapourized.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Constellations
    Winter Constellations *Orion *Canis Major *Monoceros *Canis Minor *Gemini *Auriga *Taurus *Eradinus *Lepus *Monoceros *Cancer *Lynx *Ursa Major *Ursa Minor *Draco *Camelopardalis *Cassiopeia *Cepheus *Andromeda *Perseus *Lacerta *Pegasus *Triangulum *Aries *Pisces *Cetus *Leo (rising) *Hydra (rising) *Canes Venatici (rising) Orion--Myth: Orion, the great ​ ​ hunter. In one myth, Orion boasted he would kill all the wild animals on the earth. But, the earth goddess Gaia, who was the protector of all animals, produced a gigantic scorpion, whose body was so heavily encased that Orion was unable to pierce through the armour, and was himself stung to death. His companion Artemis was greatly saddened and arranged for Orion to be immortalised among the stars. Scorpius, the scorpion, was placed on the opposite side of the sky so that Orion would never be hurt by it again. To this day, Orion is never seen in the sky at the same time as Scorpius. DSO’s ● ***M42 “Orion Nebula” (Neb) with Trapezium A stellar ​ ​ ​ nursery where new stars are being born, perhaps a thousand stars. These are immense clouds of interstellar gas and dust collapse inward to form stars, mainly of ionized hydrogen which gives off the red glow so dominant, and also ionized greenish oxygen gas. The youngest stars may be less than 300,000 years old, even as young as 10,000 years old (compared to the Sun, 4.6 billion years old). 1300 ly. ​ ​ 1 ● *M43--(Neb) “De Marin’s Nebula” The star-forming ​ “comma-shaped” region connected to the Orion Nebula. ● *M78--(Neb) Hard to see. A star-forming region connected to the ​ Orion Nebula.
    [Show full text]
  • Supernova Shocks in Molecular Clouds: Velocity Distribution of Molecular Hydrogen William T
    Draft version September 6, 2019 Typeset using LATEX preprint2 style in AASTeX63 Supernova Shocks in Molecular Clouds: Velocity Distribution of Molecular Hydrogen William T. Reach,1 Le Ngoc Tram,1 Matthew Richter,2 Antoine Gusdorf,3 Curtis DeWitt,1 1Universities Space Research Association, MS 232-11, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 2University of California, Davis, CA USA 3Observatoire de Paris, Ecole´ normale sup´erieure, Sorbonne Universit´e,CNRS, LERMA, 75005 Paris, France ABSTRACT Supernovae from core-collapse of massive stars drive shocks into the molecular clouds from which the stars formed. Such shocks affect future star formation from the molecu- lar clouds, and the fast-moving, dense gas with compressed magnetic fields is associated with enhanced cosmic rays. This paper presents new theoretical modeling, using the Paris-Durham shock model, and new observations at high spectral resolution, using the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA), of the H2 S(5) pure rota- tional line from molecular shocks in the supernova remnant IC 443. We generate MHD models for non-steady-state shocks driven by the pressure of the IC 443 blast wave into gas of densities 103 to 105 cm−3. We present the first detailed derivation of the shape of the velocity profile for emission from H2 lines behind such shocks, taking into account the shock age, preshock density, and magnetic field. For preshock densities 103{105 −3 cm , the H2 emission arises from layers that extend 0.01{0.0003 pc behind the shock, respectively. The predicted shifts of line centers, and the line widths, of the H2 lines range from 20{2, and 30{4 km s−1, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Nebulae
    Planetary Nebulae A planetary nebula is a kind of emission nebula consisting of an expanding, glowing shell of ionized gas ejected from old red giant stars late in their lives. The term "planetary nebula" is a misnomer that originated in the 1780s with astronomer William Herschel because when viewed through his telescope, these objects appeared to him to resemble the rounded shapes of planets. Herschel's name for these objects was popularly adopted and has not been changed. They are a relatively short-lived phenomenon, lasting a few tens of thousands of years, compared to a typical stellar lifetime of several billion years. The mechanism for formation of most planetary nebulae is thought to be the following: at the end of the star's life, during the red giant phase, the outer layers of the star are expelled by strong stellar winds. Eventually, after most of the red giant's atmosphere is dissipated, the exposed hot, luminous core emits ultraviolet radiation to ionize the ejected outer layers of the star. Absorbed ultraviolet light energizes the shell of nebulous gas around the central star, appearing as a bright colored planetary nebula at several discrete visible wavelengths. Planetary nebulae may play a crucial role in the chemical evolution of the Milky Way, returning material to the interstellar medium from stars where elements, the products of nucleosynthesis (such as carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and neon), have been created. Planetary nebulae are also observed in more distant galaxies, yielding useful information about their chemical abundances. In recent years, Hubble Space Telescope images have revealed many planetary nebulae to have extremely complex and varied morphologies.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPTEMBER 2014 OT H E D Ebn V E R S E R V ESEPTEMBERR 2014
    THE DENVER OBSERVER SEPTEMBER 2014 OT h e D eBn v e r S E R V ESEPTEMBERR 2014 FROM THE INSIDE LOOKING OUT Calendar Taken on July 25th in San Luis State Park near the Great Sand Dunes in Colorado, Jeff made this image of the Milky Way during an overnight camping stop on the way to Santa Fe, NM. It was taken with a Canon 2............................. First quarter moon 60D camera, an EFS 15-85 lens, using an iOptron SkyTracker. It is a single frame, with no stacking or dark/ 8.......................................... Full moon bias frames, at ISO 1600 for two minutes. Visible in this south-facing photograph is Sagittarius, and the 14............ Aldebaran 1.4˚ south of moon Dark Horse Nebula inside of the Milky Way. He processed the image in Adobe Lightroom. Image © Jeff Tropeano 15............................ Last quarter moon 22........................... Autumnal Equinox 24........................................ New moon Inside the Observer SEPTEMBER SKIES by Dennis Cochran ygnus the Swan dives onto center stage this other famous deep-sky object is the Veil Nebula, President’s Message....................... 2 C month, almost overhead. Leading the descent also known as the Cygnus Loop, a supernova rem- is the nose of the swan, the star known as nant so large that its separate arcs were known Society Directory.......................... 2 Albireo, a beautiful multi-colored double. One and named before it was found to be one wide Schedule of Events......................... 2 wonders if Albireo has any planets from which to wisp that came out of a single star. The Veil is see the pair up-close.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Make $1000 with Your Telescope! – 4 Stargazers' Diary
    Fort Worth Astronomical Society (Est. 1949) February 2010 : Astronomical League Member Club Calendar – 2 Opportunities & The Sky this Month – 3 How to Make $1000 with your Telescope! – 4 Astronaut Sally Ride to speak at UTA – 4 Aurgia the Charioteer – 5 Stargazers’ Diary – 6 Bode’s Galaxy by Steve Tuttle 1 February 2010 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 6 Algol at Minima Last Qtr Moon Æ 5:48 am 11:07 pm Top ten binocular deep-sky objects for February: M35, M41, M46, M47, M50, M93, NGC 2244, NGC 2264, NGC 2301, NGC 2360 Top ten deep-sky objects for February: M35, M41, M46, M47, M50, M93, NGC 2261, NGC 2362, NGC 2392, NGC 2403 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Algol at Minima Morning sports a Moon at Apogee New Moon Æ super thin crescent (252,612 miles) 8:51 am 7:56 pm Moon 8:00 pm 3RF Star Party Make use of the New Moon Weekend for . better viewing at the Dark Sky Site See Notes Below New Moon New Moon Weekend Weekend 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Presidents Day 3RF Star Party Valentine’s Day FWAS Traveler’s Guide Meeting to the Planets UTA’s Maverick Clyde Tombaugh Ranger 8 returns Normal Room premiers on Speakers Series discovered Pluto photographs and NatGeo 7pm Sally Ride “Fat Tuesday” Ash Wednesday 80 years ago. impacts Moon. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Algol at Minima First Qtr Moon Moon at Perigee Å (222,345 miles) 6:42 pm 12:52 am 4 pm {Low in the NW) Algol at Minima Æ 9:43 pm Challenge binary star for month: 15 Lyncis (Lynx) Challenge deep-sky object for month: IC 443 (Gemini) Notable carbon star for month: BL Orionis (Orion) 28 Notes: Full Moon Look for a very thin waning crescent moon perched just above and slightly right of tiny Mercury on the morning of 10:38 pm Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Du Ciel Profond
    Guide du ciel profond Olivier PETIT 8 mai 2004 2 Introduction hjjdfhgf ghjfghfd fg hdfjgdf gfdhfdk dfkgfd fghfkg fdkg fhdkg fkg kfghfhk Table des mati`eres I Objets par constellation 21 1 Androm`ede (And) Andromeda 23 1.1 Messier 31 (La grande Galaxie d'Androm`ede) . 25 1.2 Messier 32 . 27 1.3 Messier 110 . 29 1.4 NGC 404 . 31 1.5 NGC 752 . 33 1.6 NGC 891 . 35 1.7 NGC 7640 . 37 1.8 NGC 7662 (La boule de neige bleue) . 39 2 La Machine pneumatique (Ant) Antlia 41 2.1 NGC 2997 . 43 3 le Verseau (Aqr) Aquarius 45 3.1 Messier 2 . 47 3.2 Messier 72 . 49 3.3 Messier 73 . 51 3.4 NGC 7009 (La n¶ebuleuse Saturne) . 53 3.5 NGC 7293 (La n¶ebuleuse de l'h¶elice) . 56 3.6 NGC 7492 . 58 3.7 NGC 7606 . 60 3.8 Cederblad 211 (N¶ebuleuse de R Aquarii) . 62 4 l'Aigle (Aql) Aquila 63 4.1 NGC 6709 . 65 4.2 NGC 6741 . 67 4.3 NGC 6751 (La n¶ebuleuse de l’œil flou) . 69 4.4 NGC 6760 . 71 4.5 NGC 6781 (Le nid de l'Aigle ) . 73 TABLE DES MATIERES` 5 4.6 NGC 6790 . 75 4.7 NGC 6804 . 77 4.8 Barnard 142-143 (La tani`ere noire) . 79 5 le B¶elier (Ari) Aries 81 5.1 NGC 772 . 83 6 le Cocher (Aur) Auriga 85 6.1 Messier 36 . 87 6.2 Messier 37 . 89 6.3 Messier 38 .
    [Show full text]
  • Ghost Hunt Challenge 2020
    Virtual Ghost Hunt Challenge 10/21 /2020 (Sorry we can meet in person this year or give out awards but try doing this challenge on your own.) Participant’s Name _________________________ Categories for the competition: Manual Telescope Electronically Aided Telescope Binocular Astrophotography (best photo) (if you expect to compete in more than one category please fill-out a sheet for each) ** There are four objects on this list that may be beyond the reach of beginning astronomers or basic telescopes. Therefore, we have marked these objects with an * and provided alternate replacements for you just below the designated entry. We will use the primary objects to break a tie if that’s needed. Page 1 TAS Ghost Hunt Challenge - Page 2 Time # Designation Type Con. RA Dec. Mag. Size Common Name Observed Facing West – 7:30 8:30 p.m. 1 M17 EN Sgr 18h21’ -16˚11’ 6.0 40’x30’ Omega Nebula 2 M16 EN Ser 18h19’ -13˚47 6.0 17’ by 14’ Ghost Puppet Nebula 3 M10 GC Oph 16h58’ -04˚08’ 6.6 20’ 4 M12 GC Oph 16h48’ -01˚59’ 6.7 16’ 5 M51 Gal CVn 13h30’ 47h05’’ 8.0 13.8’x11.8’ Whirlpool Facing West - 8:30 – 9:00 p.m. 6 M101 GAL UMa 14h03’ 54˚15’ 7.9 24x22.9’ 7 NGC 6572 PN Oph 18h12’ 06˚51’ 7.3 16”x13” Emerald Eye 8 NGC 6426 GC Oph 17h46’ 03˚10’ 11.0 4.2’ 9 NGC 6633 OC Oph 18h28’ 06˚31’ 4.6 20’ Tweedledum 10 IC 4756 OC Ser 18h40’ 05˚28” 4.6 39’ Tweedledee 11 M26 OC Sct 18h46’ -09˚22’ 8.0 7.0’ 12 NGC 6712 GC Sct 18h54’ -08˚41’ 8.1 9.8’ 13 M13 GC Her 16h42’ 36˚25’ 5.8 20’ Great Hercules Cluster 14 NGC 6709 OC Aql 18h52’ 10˚21’ 6.7 14’ Flying Unicorn 15 M71 GC Sge 19h55’ 18˚50’ 8.2 7’ 16 M27 PN Vul 20h00’ 22˚43’ 7.3 8’x6’ Dumbbell Nebula 17 M56 GC Lyr 19h17’ 30˚13 8.3 9’ 18 M57 PN Lyr 18h54’ 33˚03’ 8.8 1.4’x1.1’ Ring Nebula 19 M92 GC Her 17h18’ 43˚07’ 6.44 14’ 20 M72 GC Aqr 20h54’ -12˚32’ 9.2 6’ Facing West - 9 – 10 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • February 14, 2015 7:00Pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science Colleagues, College of Southern Idaho
    Snake River Skies The Newsletter of the Magic Valley Astronomical Society www.mvastro.org Membership Meeting President’s Message Saturday, February 14, 2015 7:00pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science Colleagues, College of Southern Idaho. Public Star Party Follows at the It’s that time of year when obstacles appear in the sky. In particular, this year is Centennial Obs. loaded with fog. It got in the way of letting us see the dance of the Jovian moons late last month, and it’s hindered our views of other unique shows. Still, members Club Officers reported finding enough of a clear sky to let us see Comet Lovejoy, and some great photos by members are popping up on the Facebook page. Robert Mayer, President This month, however, is a great opportunity to see the benefit of something [email protected] getting in the way. Our own Chris Anderson of the Herrett Center has been using 208-312-1203 the Centennial Observatory’s scope to do work on occultation’s, particularly with asteroids. This month’s MVAS meeting on Feb. 14th will give him the stage to Terry Wofford, Vice President show us just how this all works. [email protected] The following weekend may also be the time the weather allows us to resume 208-308-1821 MVAS-only star parties. Feb. 21 is a great window for a possible star party; we’ll announce the location if the weather permits. However, if we don’t get that Gary Leavitt, Secretary window, we’ll fall back on what has become a MVAS tradition: Planetarium night [email protected] at the Herrett Center.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]