NCAR/TN-121+STR the Delta-Eddington Approximation for a Vertically Inhomogeneous Atmosphere

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NCAR/TN-121+STR the Delta-Eddington Approximation for a Vertically Inhomogeneous Atmosphere 3zpzti NCAR/TN-121 +STR NCAR TECHNICAL NOTE 4 July 1977 The Delta-Eddington Approximation for a Vertically Inhomogeneous Atmosphere W. J. Wiscombe ATMOSPHERIC ANALYSI ANAND PREDICTION DIVISION -~P---P·-·~---~~I----II~-~-YU~ ~eger -- 1~-~ II~- -·IC-- ~ e - -~ - I I I I -- C a NATIONAL CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH BOULDER, COLORADO iii ABSTRACT The delta-Eddington approximation of Joseph, Wiscombe, and Weinman (1976) is extended to an atmosphere divided up by internal levels into homogeneous layers. Flux continuity is enforced at each level, leading, as the mathematical essence of the problem, to a penta-diagonal system of linear equations for certain unknown con- stants. Fluxes (up, direct down, diffuse down, and net) are then pre- dicted at each level. Unphysical results of the model are examined in detail. Potential numerical instabilities in the solution are noted and corrected, and an extremely fast, well-documented computer code resulting from this analysis is described and listed. Actual computed fluxes are given for several test problems. v PREFACE It has always been painfully obvious, in my multi-spectral- interval, multi-layer, and multi-angle computer models of solar and IR radiative transfer, that the angular part of the calculation was the pacing item. Since my interest has primarily been in fluxes, it always seemed particularly unfortunate to spend the lion's share of computing time on obtaining angular information, which was then used only to compute fluxes. It would obviously have been preferable to calculate fluxes directly, but none of the existing approximations for so doing (variants of two-stream and Eddington) seemed sufficiently flexible - for in marching through the solar and IR spectrums, and vertically upward through an atmosphere, one encounters huge varia- tions in optical depth and single-scattering albedo, and the existing approximations were only valid for restricted ranges of these para- meters. Even worse, they seemed not to be able to handle the asym- metric phase functions typical of clouds and aerosols very well. Then J. H. Joseph, J. A. Weinman and I (1976) discovered the excellent accuracy of the delta-Eddington approximation (which cal- culates flux directly) for all phase functions, no matter how asym- metric, and for all optical depths and single-scattering albedos; but we investigated only homogeneous layers. It was therefore only natural for me to work up a multi-layer version, which I used to replace adding-doubling in my spectrally-detailed radiation models for a cloudy atmosphere. The solar flux changes from so doing were -5-15 watts/m 25(on the order of present uncertainty in the solar vi constant), and could equally well be caused by almost undetectable variations in the effective radius of the cloud drops. [These results were presented in August, 1976, at the Symposium on Radiation in the Atmosphere in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, West Germany.] I concluded from these results that the multi-level delta-Eddington approximation was potentially of great utility to a wide variety of users who wanted radiative fluxes of roughly 1% accuracy. This was the motivation for publishing the present document. I would like to thank Dr. V, Ramanathan for his careful review of and suggestions for improving this publication. Warren J. Wiscombe May 1977 vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. ONE-LAYER FORMULAS .......... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2. ALBEDO OF A SEMI-INFINITE LAYER . 0 *I 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 6 3. MULTI-LAYER FORMULATION . ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4. THE COMPUTER CODE ........ 0 0 16 4o1 ELIMINATION OF w=1 BRANCH .. ....... 16 4.2 MULTIPLE DIRECTIONS OF INCIDENCE ..... 18 4.3 SOLVING THE LINEAR SYSTEM ...... 18 4.4 ILL-CONDITIONING .. I 20 4.5 SPURIOUS AND NEGATIVE FLUXES IN HIGHLY ABSORBING CASES . .. .. .. 22 4.6 FAILURE TESTING .. ................. 27 4.7 SPEEDING UP THE CODE . ................ 27 5. ACCURACY . 29 REFERENCES .... ... .................... 30 APPENDIX A: LISTING OF COMPUTER CODE FOR THE MULTI-LAYER DELTA-EDDINGTON APPROXIMATION ........ ... 31 APPENDIX B: TEST PROBLEMS 1-11 .... ...... ...... 53 APPENDIX C: COMPARISON OF DELTA-EDDINGTON AND ADDING-DOUBLING FLUX COMPUTATIONS ................. 63 1 1. ONE-LAYER FORMULAS The delta-Eddington formulas for a single homogeneous layer will be required in the multi-layer formalism. Let us therefore derive them, using the notation: w = scaled single scattering albedo of layer g = scaled asymmetry factor of layer T = scaled optical depth within layer AT = total scaled optical depth of layer \P = cosine of zenith angle of monodirectional beam incident upon top of layer S = incident-beam flux A = surface albedo. The scaling relationships are = * 2 fl-e* )0*2 g T = ( w*g**g*2)T* )* , (1 - ) -*- +l~ g - w*g*W*~~g1 where g*, T*, a* are the actual values of the layer's optical parameters. If we follow the procedure outlined in the paragraph following Eq. (16) of Joseph et al. (1976), we arrive at two differential equa- tions, which are: dG 3 3 3ST/g 0 dT + 2 (l-g)H = wSgpe (la) dH 1 -T/P0 d + 2(1-w)G = wSe (lb) where G, H are proportional to the i0, i1 of Joseph et al., E G -E i0 , H -2 ri (2) 2 The solution of these equations is straightforward when w and g do not vary with T. There are two cases which arise: (1) w < 1 G = cle + c2 ae O (3a) X- -XT T/1Oi H = -Pcle + Pc2e / - e (3b) 2 where cl, c2 are arbitrary constants and X = /3(1-o)(l-wg) (3c) I ..... (3d) 2 = X | (3d) p 3 1-cgX , - , 3 1 + g(l-) (3e) 4 2 2 (l/po)-X 3g(l-w)pO0 + (1/p0) =3 WS 2 2 - (3f) 2 2 (1/) X (2) = 1 G = c1 - (l-g)c 2 T - 4 Se (4a) 2 1 S-/ 0 H = c 2 - Spe 0 (4b) where cl, c2 again are arbitrary constants. The solution (3a-f) is invalid when p0 = 1/X, for then the particular and homogeneous solutions of the differential equations (la-b) coincide. Eqs. (3a-b) do approach a finite limit as p0 - 1/X, but computational overflows will occur in practice, since the limit 3 > is of the form 0/0. However, D 0 can only equal 1/% if X 1, or if g+l - - g + 1 w - l = 2g < Since dol/dg 0, and since wo1 equals 2/3 at g = 0, it is clear that we need never concern ourselves with this case if w > 2/3. Even should it arise, it can easily be avoided by changing pO slightly. Only upon attempting an analytic integration over pO might it be necessary to bear this case in mind (numerical integration could simply avoid picking pO = 1/X as a quadrature point). Diffuse up, diffuse down, and net fluxes for the layer are given by the following expressions: -1 -1 F = 27 r pi(T,11) dp = 27 1 (Di0 + i12i1 ) dl 0 0 2 = 7(i 0 - i1 ) = G- H (5a) +, .1 2 F = 27 (5b) I pli(T,v) dp = Tr(i 0 + il) = G + H 0 -T/PO + F + -T/pO F = p Se + F - F = p Se + 2H (5c) Note from Eqs. (5c) and (lb) that d = -Se + dH +/0 ^ -= - - 2 = -(1-c) (Se 0 + 4G 1 (6) This shows that when there is no absorption, w = 1, the approximation 4 conserves flux. Furthermore, when absorption is present, w < 1, the approximation guarantees positive absorptivities, dF/dT < 0, provided G > 0. [Clearly G, being proportional to mean intensity, should be positive on physical grounds.] The differential equation satisfied by G, from Eqs. (la-b), is 2 3 -T/P0 G" - X G = - w [l+g(l-o)]Se Because the right-hand side is negative, G cannot have a relative minimum at which it is negative or zero; for at such a minimum, G" > 0 and X2 G < 0, which is impossible. Hence G(O) > 0 and G(AT) > ==0 G(T) 0 for O < T < AT because otherwise G would, upon leaving G(O) 2 0 and becoming negative, have to 'turn back,' constituting thereby a relative minimum, to reach G(AT) 2 0. One can argue for G(O) 2 0 as follows. The top boundary condi- + tion, prescribing a diffuse down-flux F0 at T = 0, is G(0) + H(O) = F0 . (7) But physically the net flux at the top of the layer cannot exceed the incident flux 10S + F0 , which, from Eq. (5c), implies H(O) < - F . Therefore G(O) > 0 from Eq. (7). [This is not, of course, a rigorous proof, in that it draws on an assumption not properly part of the equations.] Given G(0) > 0, one can argue rigorously for G(AT) > 0. Let + as Lambert there be a prescribed up-flux F 0 at T = AT, as well 5 reflection with albedo A(p ): G(AT) - H(AT) = F0 t + A(D 0 ) G(AT) + H(AT) + p 0Se i (8) [The reason for a p0 dependence in A is explained later.] Eq. (la) allows this to be reduced to a boundary condition involving G alone, G'(AT) + Y1G(AT) = where all we need to know about y1 and y2 is that they are positive. Suppose G(AT) < 0. Then G'(AT) > 0 from the last equation. It follows that G(T) must have a negative relative minimum in order to turn up and reach G(0) 2 0. Since this is impossible, G(AT) > 0 is proved by con- tradiction. In sum, positivity of G(0) establishes positivity of G, and therefore of absorptivities, at all optical depths.
Recommended publications
  • Comparing Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta
    comparing futures for the sacramento–san joaquin delta jay lund | ellen hanak | william fleenor william bennett | richard howitt jeffrey mount | peter moyle 2008 Public Policy Institute of California Supported with funding from Stephen D. Bechtel Jr. and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation ISBN: 978-1-58213-130-6 Copyright © 2008 by Public Policy Institute of California All rights reserved San Francisco, CA Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office. Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Directors of the Public Policy Institute of California. Summary “Once a landscape has been established, its origins are repressed from memory. It takes on the appearance of an ‘object’ which has been there, outside us, from the start.” Karatani Kojin (1993), Origins of Japanese Literature The Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta is the hub of California’s water supply system and the home of numerous native fish species, five of which already are listed as threatened or endangered. The recent rapid decline of populations of many of these fish species has been followed by court rulings restricting water exports from the Delta, focusing public and political attention on one of California’s most important and iconic water controversies.
    [Show full text]
  • F, I3/ M EARTH VIEW: a Business Guide to Orbital Remote Sensing
    _Ot-//JJ J zJ v - _'-.'3 7 F, i3/ m EARTH VIEW: A Business Guide to Orbital Remote Sensing NgI-Z4&71 (_!ASA-C_-ISB23_) EAsT VIEW: A 3USINESS GUI_E TO ORBITAL REMOTE SENSING (Houston Univ.) 13I p CSCL OBB Unclos G3/_3 001_137 Peter C. Bishop July 1990 Cooperative Agreement NCC 9-16 Research Activity No. IM.1 NASA Johnson Space Center Office of Commercial Programs Space Station Utilization Office "=.,. © Research Institute for Computing and Information Systems University of Houston - Clear Lake - T.E.C.H.N.I.C.A.L R.E.P.O.R.T Iml i I Jg. I k . U I i .... 7X7 iml The university of Houston-Clear Lake established the Research Institute for Computing and Information systems in 1986 to encourage NASA Johnson Space Center and local industry to actively support research in the computing and r' The information sciences. As part of this endeavor, UH-Clear Lake proposed a _._ partnership with JSC to jointly define and manage an integrated program of research in advanced data processing technology needed for JSC's main missions, including RICIS administrative, engineering and science responsibilities. JSC agreed and entered itffo : " a three-year cooperatlveagreement with UH-Clear _ke beginning in May, 1986, to ii jointly plan and execute such research through RICIS. Additionally, under Concept Cooperative Agreement NCC 9-16, computing and educational facilities are shared by the two institutions to conduct the research. The mission of RICIS is to conduct, coordinate and disseminate research on _-.. -- : computing and information systems among researchers, sponsors and users from UH-Clear Lake, NASA/JSC, and other research organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Commercial Launch Vehicles
    Fourth Quarter 2001 Quarterly Launch Report 8 The Evolution of Commercial Launch Vehicles INTRODUCTION LAUNCH VEHICLE ORIGINS On February 14, 1963, a Delta launch vehi- The initial development of launch vehicles cle placed the Syncom 1 communications was an arduous and expensive process that satellite into geosynchronous orbit (GEO). occurred simultaneously with military Thirty-five years later, another Delta weapons programs; launch vehicle and launched the Bonum 1 communications missile developers shared a large portion of satellite to GEO. Both launches originated the expenses and technology. The initial from Launch Complex 17, Pad B, at Cape generation of operational launch vehicles in Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. both the United States and the Soviet Union Bonum 1 weighed 21 times as much as the was derived and developed from the oper- earlier Syncom 1 and the Delta launch vehicle ating country's military ballistic missile that carried it had a maximum geosynchro- programs. The Russian Soyuz launch vehicle nous transfer orbit (GTO) capacity 26.5 is a derivative of the first Soviet interconti- times greater than that of the earlier vehicle. nental ballistic missile (ICBM) and the NATO-designated SS-6 Sapwood. The Launch vehicle performance continues to United States' Atlas and Titan launch vehicles constantly improve, in large part to meet the were developed from U.S. Air Force's first demands of an increasing number of larger two ICBMs of the same names, while the satellites. Current vehicles are very likely to initial Delta (referred to in its earliest be changed from last year's versions and are versions as Thor Delta) was developed certainly not the same as ones from five from the Thor intermediate range ballistic years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Les Kovacs
    United Launch Alliance Overview 2016 ITEA Symposium Les Kovacs Director, Executive Branch Affairs October 5, 2016 Copyright © 2012 United Launch Alliance, LLC. Unpublished Work. All Rights Reserved. United Launch Alliance Overview Delta Family Atlas V Family EELV Provides Assured Access for National Security Space Missions Two World Class Launch Systems – Atlas V, Delta IV More Than a Century of Combined Experience in Expendable Launch Systems – Pooled Experience of > 1300 Launches – Legacy Reaching Back to the 1950s Commercial Sales Through Lockheed Commercial Launch Services or 401 431 551 Medium Medium Heavy Boeing Launch Services 4,2 5,4 GTO LEO GTO LEO 4,750 kg – 8,900 kg 8,080 kg – 15,760 kg 4,210 kg – 13,810 kg 7,690 kg – 23,560 kg 10,470 lb – 19,620 lb 17,820 lb – 34,750 lb 9,280 lb – 30,440 lb 16,960 lb – 51,950 lb One Team, One Infrastructure , 100% Mission Success 11 October 2016 | 1 A Sampling of Notable Launches… MSL New Horizons EFT-1 JUNO WGS OTV GPS 11 October 2016 | 2 30 Year Product Road Map Delta-M RD180 Delta-Hvy 2045 Retired Retired Retired BE4 Replaces the RD180 11 OctoberLater 2016 | 3 Upgrade to ACES Retires Delta-Heavy for ¼ the Lift Cost 500 Series Configuration Expanded Existing Centaur Second Stage New Composite New (Common) 5.4m Interstage Diameter Booster New Solid Rocket Boosters Existing 5.4m New Existing PLF BE-4 Avionics Engines & Software New 5.4m Lower PLF Adapter New Composite Heat Shield 1111 October October 2016 2016| 4 | 4 Atlas - Vulcan Evolution 38 34 30 26 5m PLF Single 22 Common Avionics
    [Show full text]
  • "Big Data" Analysis of Rocket Failure
    A “Big Data” Analysis of Rocket Failure Anthony Ozerov 2019 A “Big Data” Analysis of Rocket Failure Introduction The field of Big Data, which I have professional and hobbyist experience in, is emerging as one which has the possibility to do everything from making advertising more effective to improving crop yields. However, one field which I have not seen it applied to is rocketry, and I wondered how Big Data could be used to predict rocket failures. The aim of this investigation is to predict one output value—the probability of failure of a rocket—based on as much data as is practically possible to obtain in a reasonably automated manner. Data in the investigation will include: • Mean climate data for the day (e.g. surface temperature) • The launch vehicle used (e.g. a Saturn V) • The launch site (e.g. Cape Canaveral) By applying a subset of statistics called “Statistical Learning” to said data, I think it will be possible to predict the probability of failure of any launch. This will provide interesting insights. For example, if there is little correlation between the climate data and the probability of failure, I could conclude that launch providers are scheduling launches at the correct times, when the weather provides no risk to the launch vehicle. The scope of this investigation is every rocket launch before 2018, as I was unable to find complete climate data for 2018 and after. Data Sources The only complete and sourced rocket launch dataset I found was at planet4589.org1. This dataset includes the date of a launch, the launch vehicle, the launch site, and if the launch was a failure or a success, and will clearly provide some of the desired predictors and the output value.
    [Show full text]
  • A Method of Measuring High Delta M Doubles
    Vol. 3 No. 4 Fall 2007 Journal of Double Star Observations Page 159 A Method of Measuring High Delta m Doubles James A. Daley Ludwig Schupmann Observarory New Ipswich,NH [email protected] Abstract: This paper describes a method of precisely measuring theta and rho for pairs in which the difference in stellar magnitude (delta m) is in the range of 8 to 12 . The instrumentation takes the form of a stellar coronagraph where, in this design, a highly attenuating foil strip is substituted for the normal opaque occultor, thus giving a sharp, well exposed and well defined position for the bright primary, along with faint and sometimes numerous components lying clear of the foil. Many WDS listed high dm components are unconfirmed providing an additional challenge in their recovery. Although many components are optical, good measures of these objects can be of some value in various proper motion studies. The instruments optical/mechanical design is described in sufficient detail such that other observers may assemble a similar device from their optics collection. CCD images of a few program stars are also shown. Introduction referring to the highly attenuating foil strip. Measuring high delta m pairs with a CCD detec- Sources of Scattered Light tor presents special difficulties due to detector satura- Light is scattered passing through the atmosphere tion. Even in the case of wide pairs, where the faint and again in the telescope optics. Depending on sky secondary is well imaged outside this saturated re- conditions, one or the other can be the dominant gion, calculating the centroid of the overexposed contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress of the United States Congressional Budget Office October 1986
    CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE OCTOBER 1986 A SPECIAL STUDY CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE Rudo, h Q Pennef U.S. CONGRESS Director WASHINGTON, D.C. 20515 ERRATA Setting Space Transportation Policy for the 1990's October 1986 In this study, Table 11, on page 39, should appear as attached. The text referring to Table 11, on pages 38 and 39, should appear as below: "If a new orbiter was flown four times each year and the margi- nal cost of a shuttle flight was $65 million, then the real dis- counted cost of building and operating the additional orbiter at full capacity is estimated to be $4.3 billion from 1987 through 2000. Expendable launch vehicles, each of which is capable of carrying only 40 percent of a shuttle flight and is launched at a cost of $60 million, can provide comparable capacity at a cost of $5.0 billion over the same period." CHAPTER IV OPTIONS 39 TABLE 11. THE DISCOUNTED COST OF SHUTTLE CAPACITY COMPARED WITH EQUIVALENT ELV PRODUCTION AT DIFFERENT ANNUAL FLIGHT RATES, 1987-2000 (In billions of 1986 dollars) Annual Number of Equivalent Shuttle Flights ELV Shuttle 1 1.4 2.7 2 2.7 3.2 3 3.5 3.7 4' 5.0 4.3 SOURCE: Congressional Budget Office. NOTES: The estimates include: $2.2 billion cost for a replacement orbiter with funding authorized from 1987 through 1992; a marginal operating cost of $65 million per shuttle flight; a $60 million launched cost for a .4 equivalent shuttle flight ELV at the three and four equivalent shuttle flight operating rate; a $65 million launched cost for the same ELV at the two equivalent shuttle flights annual level; and $70 million launched cost for the same ELV at the one shuttle flight operating rate.
    [Show full text]
  • 1974 (8.2Mb Pdf)
    hXJ NATIONAL AERONAUTICSAND SPACEADMINISTRATION John F. Kennedy Space Center . Kennedy Space Center, Fla. 32899 / FORRELEASE: A. H. Lavender January 1, 1974 305 867-2468 Release #KSC-1-74 OVER 1,500,000 VISITED KSC IN 1973 KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, Fla.--More than 1,500,000 people visited the Space Center in 1973, the eighth year in which the public was admitted on a daily basis to NASA's major launch base. Trans World Airlines operates the Visitors Information Center and employs Florida Parlor Coach Co., Inc., a Greyhound subsidiary, to provide buses and escorts fc)r the daily 50-mile tours. TWA reported 1,264,321 patrons boarded the tour buses in 1973 which was second only to the peak year of 1972 in total attendance. About 20 percent of the visitors do not take the tour. The sustained public interest in the program was demonstrated by heavy visitation through the first 11 months of the year. By November 30, total attendance was only 5 percent under 1972. Impact of the gasoline problem on tourism, which was noted elsewhere in Florida, became apparent in December which is normally the peak month. Between December 15 and 31, 1973, boardings of the tour buses declined almost 40 percent compared to the 1972 levels. This drop had been anticipated by TWA which operated a fleet of 40 buses to take care of the crowds. In the same period of 1972, 78 buses were required. As a result of the sharp reduction for the holidays, the 1973 bus patronage dropped about 9 percent under the 1972 level.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazards Volume IU: Risk Analysis
    PB93199040 Hazard Analysis of Com,mercial Sp,ace Transportation V,olume I: Operations Volume II: Hazards Volume IU: Risk Analysis Prepared for: Office of Commercial Space Transportation Prepared by: Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, MA 02142 May 1988 Cover illustration: Near Earth Satellite Population of July 1,1987 Compliments of Teledyne Brown Engineering REPRODUCED BY, NJlI u.s. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service Springfield, Virginia 22161 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VOLUME I: SPACE TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS 1. THE CONTEXT FOR A HAZARD ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL SPACE ACTIVITIES 11 POLICY AND MARKET CONTEXT 1-1 1.2 REGULATORY CONTEXT FOR COMMERCIAL SPACE OPERATIONS 1-2 1 3 PU RPOSE AND SCOPE OF REPORT: HAZARD ANALYSIS OR RISK ASSESSMENT , 1-3 1.4 APPROACH TO HAZARD ANALYSIS FOR COMMERCIAL SPACE OPERATIONS 1-4 15 OVERVIEW OF THE REPORT ORGANIZATION 1-6 2. RANGE OPERATiONS, CONTROLS AND SAFETY 2 1 RANGE CHARACTERISTICS FOR SAFE OPERATION " ... ... .. .. ... .. ... .. 2-1 2.1.1 US Government Launch Sites ' " 2-1 2.1.2 Ground Operations and Safety 2-2 21.3 Range Safety Control System 2-3 22 LAUNCH PLANNING 2-6 221 Mission Planning 2-7 2.2.2 Standard Procedures to Prepare for a Launch 2-9 3. EXPENDABLE LAUNCH VEHKlE (ELV) CHARACTERISTICS 31 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS 3-1 32 LAUNCH VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY 3-4 3_2.1 Propulsion Systems 3-5 3.2.2 Support Systems and Tanks 3-9 3T3Guloa-n-ceSystems 3-10 3.2.4 UpperStages 3-10 33 REPRESENTATIVE ELV's 3-11 33.1 Titan. ......... .... .... .. .... ................. .... 3-11 33.2 Delta.
    [Show full text]
  • Bombs Error Kills 28 SAIGON (AP) — Two U.S
    cMpMff» Fair tUsy aHaH aid tonight. Pufly do»dy and coot tqpwrrew, Ufb both dajT ( Red Bank Area f la mU to upper Mi. Ummti&t meat St. Outlook Friday, cloudy Copyrlght-lta Red B«nk Rejlrter, toe.UW. and cool. •* MONMOUTH COUNTY'S HOME NEWSPAPER FOR 88 YEABS DIAL 741-0010 '. 8M0M ClMI PlMUK WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1966 7c PER COPY PAGE ONE VOL. 89, NO. 66 ffiT^Si, i M«Uln» ottlma In Friendly Viet Village Bombs Error Kills 28 SAIGON (AP) — Two U.S. enemy was reported in the four William C. Westmoreland, the ond cache in the sama alea to- da] forces teams have drawn Marine bombers missed their new operations, which were U.S. commander In Viet Nam, day which included more am- guerrillas to fight the "Com- target and dropped 500-pound launched earlier this, month but sent congratulations , to the munition and large amounts of munists. : ' bombs by error yesterday on a were not announced until today. forces which found It. rice, uniforms and clothing. U.S. rescue and civic assii- friend)/ village- occupied by Find Ammo Cache The cache included 70,000 U.S. authorities began an Im- tance teams were sent to the Vietnamese forces and their In other, war developments, '• rounds of small-arms ammuni- mediate investigation of the village to begin ttlief work, ~ families. reconnaissance company of tion, 800 mortar rounds, 7,000 Marine bombing of the friendly The U.S. spokesman said the A U.S. military spokesman South Vietnamese troops un- grenades, 160 rockets, 4,000 anti- village, and Marine helicopters two Marine planes ware on an said the mistake bombing killed covered a huge cache of Viet tank mines, 20,000 detonators flew the wounded to a govern- air itrike against a specified ment hospital in nearby Quang 28 soldiers and civilians and Cong ammunition and explosives and large quantities of TNT and target but dropped their bombs Ngal city.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Features
    Solar Inverters for North America Single Phase Solar Inverters for North America M4-TL-US | M5-TL-US | M6-TL-US | M8-TL-US | M10-TL-US Key Features: Operation and Installation Manual for M Series Smart inverter with Bluetooth, optional WiFi, Zigbee, 3G/4G cellular communication M4-TL-US Field upgrade-able M5-TL-US from solar inverter (M6, M8) to storage system by adding M6-TL-US battery pack and software upgrade M8-TL-US Supporting M10-TL-US bi-directional cloud communication & monitoring Type 4 protection with natural convection cooling Built-in AFCI & Rapid shutdown controller US No field commissioning required CEC efficiency 97.5% Option: Revenue Grade Meter: ANSI 12.20 (0.5% accuracy) UL 1741SA, HECO & CA Rule 21 compliant This manual is subject to change. Please check our website at http://www.delta-americas.com/SolarInverters.aspx for the most up-to-date manual version. © Copyright – DELTA ELECTRONICS (SHANGHAI) CO.,LTD. - All rights reserved. This manual accompanies our equipment for use by the end users. The technical instructions and illustrations contained in this ma- nual are to be treated as confidential and no part may be reproduced without the prior written permission of DELTA ELECTRONICS (SHANGHAI) CO.,LTD. Service engineers and end users may not divulge the information contained herein or use this manual for purposes other than those strictly connected with correct use of the equipment. All information and specifications are subject to change without notice. 1 Table of Contents 1 General safety instructions 4
    [Show full text]
  • SLS) 12 Aerojet Rocketdyne 24 Orbital ATK 36 Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM A CASE FOR SMALL BUSINESS TABLE OF CONTENTS ii Office of Small Business Programs (OSBP) Vision and Mission Statements 1 Message from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Administrator 3 Message from the Office of Small Business Programs Associate Administrator 5 Message from the Space Launch System Program Manager 6 The Metrics: Small Business Achievements at NASA 8 Space Launch System (SLS) 12 Aerojet Rocketdyne 24 Orbital ATK 36 Teledyne Brown Engineering, Inc. 48 The Boeing Company 61 List of Supporting Small Businesses 72 Small Business Program Contacts 74 Office of Small Business Programs Contact Information i VISION STATEMENT The vision of the Office of Small Business Programs (OSBP) at NASA Headquarters is to promote and integrate all small businesses into the competitive base of contractors that pioneers the future in space exploration, scientific discovery, and aeronautics research. MISSION STATEMENT Our mission in the Office of Small Business Programs is to: • advise the Administrator on all matters related to NASA small business programs; promote the development and management of NASA programs that assist all categories of small business; • develop small businesses in high-tech areas that include technology transfer and commercialization of technology; and • provide small businesses maximum practicable opportunities to participate in NASA prime contracts and subcontracts. ii VISION AND MISSION STATEMENTS Message from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Administrator At NASA, we are on a journey to The SLS rocket will be the most powerful ever built Mars, and small businesses are and will someday propel American astronauts to deep helping us get there.
    [Show full text]