DOCSLIB.ORG

Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit for Decision-Making February 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit for Decision-Making February 2009 United States Federal Transit Administration Department of Transportation Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation Characteristics of BUS RAPID TRANSIT for Decision-Making Project No. FTA-FL-26-7109.2009.1 February 2009 Photo courtesy of Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Characteristics of BUS RAPID TRANSIT for Decision-Making funded by the Federal Transit Administration FTA Project Manager: Helen M. Tann Transportation Program Specialist Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Principal Investigator: Dennis Hinebaugh Director, National BRT Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida (USF) 4202 E. Fowler Ave, CUT100 Tampa, FL 33620 © February 2009 Federal Transit Administration U.S. Department of Transportation NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the United States Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND February 2009 DATES COVERED 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit for Decision-Making (CBRT) NUMBERS 6. AUTHOR(S) Roderick B. Diaz (editor) Dennis Hinebaugh, National Bus Rapid Transit Institute (Director) FL-26-7109 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION National Bus Rapid Transit Institute REPORT NUMBER Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida FL-26-7109-05 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, FL 33620 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/ U.S. Department of Transportation MONITORING Federal Transit Administration AGENCY REPORT Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation (TRI) NUMBER 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 FTA-FL-26-7109.2009.1 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION Available From: National Bus Rapid Transit Institute, Center for Urban Transportation Research, CODE University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT100, Tampa, FL 33620 Also available through NBRTI web site: https://www.nbrti.org 13. ABSTRACT The Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit for Decision-Making (CBRT) report was prepared to provide transportation planners and decision makers with basic information and data to support the development and evaluation of bus rapid transit concepts as one of many options during alternatives analyses and subsequent project planning. This report provides information on BRT systems in a single, easy to use reference tool for transportation planners in selecting from the large array of BRT elements and integrating them into comprehensive systems. The CBRT report explores BRT through a progression of three different perspectives. First, seven major elements of BRT are presented along with their respective features and attributes. Second, the BRT elements are related to attributes of system performance. Finally, the benefits of BRT systems are discussed. This order of the discussion suggests the relationship between BRT elements, system performance and system benefits. BRT systems are constructed by choosing and integrating among BRT elements. The integration of elements improves system performance and improves the experience for customers. Improvements to system performance (in combination with features of BRT elements) generate benefits to transit agencies and communities. 15. NUMBER OF 14. SUBJECT TERMS PAGES 410 Bus Rapid Transit, BRT, Transit, Public Transportation, Characteristics 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT OF ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) III AUTHOR ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This information document was updated and revised for the United States De- Joseph Calabrese, Greater Cleveland (Ohio) Regional Transit Authority partment of Transportation’s (U.S. DOT) Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Rex Gephart, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority by a consortium of organizations led by the National Bus Rapid Transit Institute (NBRTI) at the Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Alan Danaher, Parsons Brinckerhoff Florida. The consortium includes Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc., STV Incorporated, TranSystems, Washington Group International, and Weststart-CALSTART. Cliff Henke, Parsons Brinckerhoff Roderick Diaz was the principal editor of this document, with editorial contribu- Peter Koonce, ITS Consultant tions from Lisa Callaghan Jerram, Georges Darido, and Paul Schimek. Contribut- Herb Levinson, Private Consultant ing authors include Jennifer Flynn, Cheryl Thole, Alasdair Cain, and Victoria Perk of the National Bus Rapid Transit Institute; Richard Laver and Travis Dunn of Ted Orosz, New York City Transit Booz Allen Hamilton; Pilar Rodriguez and Rosemary Gerty of TranSystems; Paul Lurae Stuart, APTA Schimek of Washington Group International; and Greg Moscoe and Lawrence Wnuk of Weststart-CALSTART. Additional data on international BRT systems Stefano Viggiano, Lane Transit District, Eugene, Oregon was collected by Graham Currie of Monash University and Daniel Haufschild of MRC McLean Hazel. Other contributors include Wendy Teague, report de- Bill Vincent, Breakthrough Technologies sign; Patricia Ball, copy editing; and Pamella Clark and Lisa Ravenscroft, process David Wohlwill, Port Authority of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania coordinators. FTA Project Manager was Helen Tann, Transportation Program Specialist. Nigel Wilson, MIT We are grateful to Renee Haider of the National Transit Institute and to the Sam Zimmerman, World Bank NBRTI Advisory Board for external review and feedback: V TABLE of CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................E-1 CHAPTER 4: BRT SYSTEM BENEFITS ................................................................................ 4-1 Higher Ridership ...........................................................................................................................4-2 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION—NEED AND PURPOSE ........................................1-1 Capital Cost Effectiveness ......................................................................................................4-20 What is BRT? ....................................................................................................................................1-1 Operating Cost Efficiency ......................................................................................................4-26 BRT in the Transportation Planning Process ..................................................................1-2 Transit-Supportive Land Development ........................................................................ 4-30 Intended Use of the CBRT Report ...................................................................................... 1-3 Environmental Quality .......................................................................................................... 4-36 Structure and Content of CBRT ...........................................................................................1-4 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND SUMMARY .......................................................... 5-1 CHAPTER 2: MAJOR ELEMENTS OF BRT ........................................................................2-1 Summary of BRT Experience .................................................................................................. 5-1 Running Way .................................................................................................................................. 2-3 Sustaining the CBRT Report ...................................................................................................5-6 Stations ............................................................................................................................................2-19 Closing Remarks ............................................................................................................................ 5-7 Vehicles ...........................................................................................................................................2-42 Fare Collection ............................................................................................................................2-61
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States
    BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States By: Andrew Degerstrom September 2018 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................1 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................1 Economic Development and Transit-Oriented Development ...................2 Definition of Bus Rapid Transit .................................................................2 Literature Review ..................................................................................3 BRT Economic Development Outcomes ...................................................3 Factors that Affect the Success of BRTOD Implementation .....................5 Case Studies ...........................................................................................7 Cleveland HealthLine ................................................................................7 Pittsburgh Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway East Liberty Station ..... 11 Pittsburgh Uptown-Oakland BRT and the EcoInnovation District .......... 16 BRTOD at home, the rapid bus A Line and the METRO Gold Line .........20 Conclusion .............................................................................................23 References .............................................................................................24 Artist rendering of Pittsburgh's East Liberty neighborhood and the Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway Introduction Purpose of this Report If Light Rail Transit (LRT)
    [Show full text]
  • • NOV-DEC MEETINGS Mayor Emanuel Joins Chicago Transit
    OFFICIAL NEWSLEITER OF THE OMNIBUS SOCIETY OF AMERICA, INC. NOV-DEC 2011 RUN 06-2011 Welcome to another issue of The Green Pennant Special, our residents." the official publication of The Omnibus Society of America. Through this publication we hope to keep our readers The displays will provide four lines of text via CTA Bus informed of events happening in the transit industry in Tracker with bus arrival information, and eventually Chicago and other cities in the United States. important customer alerts affecting the respective route and surrounding transfer points. The LED signs will be Visit the Omnibus Society of America website at "www.osabus.org". At www.osabus.org we will be installed on the sides of bus shelters and face outward to posting upcoming fan trips and meetings information, as serve as many riders as possible - both those at the stop well as membership information. and within the vicinity of the shelter. Please visit our site when you have a chance and give us "The installation of these signs will help simplify your opinions and comments. commuting by providing highly visible information on bus • NOV-DEC MEETINGS arrivals at that stop, including places where there are transfers to bus or rail service," said CT A President Forrest The November meeting of the Omnibus Society of Claypool. "The availability of these signs also will extend America will be held on November 4, 2011, at the Beef & the benefits of CTA Bus Tracker to those who may not be Brandy located at 127 S. State Street in downtown familiar with the service or may not have the tools to Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • President's 2015 Budget Recommendations
    CTA: Investing in Chicago President’s 2015 Budget Recommendations Rendering of future design CTA FY15 Budget Chicago Transit Board Terry Peterson, Chairman Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Jacquelyne Grimshaw, Vice Chairman Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Ashish Sen Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Robert Lewis Appointed by: Governor, State of Illinois Rev. Charles E. Robinson Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Alejandro Silva Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Kevin Irvine Appointed by: Mayor, City of Chicago Forrest Claypool, President Distinguished Budget Presentation Award a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to Chicago Transit Authority, Illinois for the Annual TheBudget Government beginning Finance January Officers 01, 2014. Association In order of the to Unitedreceive States this andaward, Canada a governmental (GFOA) presented unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operationsThis award guide,is valid as for a financiala period plan,andof one year as only.a communications device. transitchicago.com 14JN67 1-888-YOUR-CTA CTA FY15 Budget Table of Contents Letter from the President ............................................................................................................................................... 1 CTA Organizational Chart ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura/Lompoc Smart Card Demonstration Evaluation: Final Report Volume 1 Technical Performance, User Response, and Institutional Analysis Genevieve Giuliano, James E
    CALIFORNIA PATH PROGRAM INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Ventura/Lompoc Smart Card Demonstration Evaluation: Final Report Volume 1 Technical Performance, User Response, and Institutional Analysis Genevieve Giuliano, James E. Moore II, Jacqueline Golob California PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-99-30 This work was performed as part of the California PATH Program of the University of California, in cooperation with the State of California Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency, Department of Transportation; and the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Report for RTA 65V313-7 August 1999 ISSN 1055-1425 CALIFORNIA PARTNERS FOR ADVANCED TRANSIT AND HIGHWAYS Ventura/Lompoc Smart Card Demonstration Evaluation: Final Report Volume 1 Technical Performance, User Response, and Institutional Analysis Genevieve Giuliano, James E. Moore II, Jacqueline Golob Research Report MOU RTA 65V313-7 July 1999 DISCLAIMER This work was performed as part of the California PATH Program of the University of California, in cooperation with the State of California Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency, Department of Transportation; and the United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California.
    [Show full text]
  • BUS STATIONS AS TOD ANCHORS REPORT Prepared in Accordance with California Senate Bill 961, 2017-2018 Regular Session
    Housing Financing Tools and Equitable, Location-Efficient Development in California BUS STATIONS AS TOD ANCHORS REPORT Prepared in Accordance with California Senate Bill 961, 2017-2018 Regular Session Prepared for: Governor's Office of Planning and Research December 29, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 5 Report Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 5 Report Organization ................................................................................................................ 5 II. BACKGROUND ON THE SECOND NEIGHBORHOOD INFILL FINANCE AND TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS ACT ................................................................................................................ 7 Definition of Bus Transit ......................................................................................................... 7 Extent of Use ........................................................................................................................... 7 III. LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................ 9 Literature Overview ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Llght Rall Translt Statlon Deslgn Guldellnes
    PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT V.4.0 7/20/18 STATION DESIGN GUIDELINES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) provides public transportation throughout Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. The Authority’s 2,600 employees operate, maintain, and support bus, light rail, incline, and paratransit services for approximately 200,000 daily riders. Port Authority is currently focused on enacting several improvements to make service more efficient and easier to use. Numerous projects are either underway or in the planning stages, including implementation of smart card technology, real-time vehicle tracking, and on-street bus rapid transit. Port Authority is governed by an 11-member Board of Directors – unpaid volunteers who are appointed by the Allegheny County Executive, leaders from both parties in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate, and the Governor of Pennsylvania. The Board holds monthly public meetings. Port Authority’s budget is funded by fare and advertising revenue, along with money from county, state, and federal sources. The Authority’s finances and operations are audited on a regular basis, both internally and by external agencies. Port Authority began serving the community in March 1964. The Authority was created in 1959 when the Pennsylvania Legislature authorized the consolidation of 33 private transit carriers, many of which were failing financially. The consolidation included the Pittsburgh Railways Company, along with 32 independent bus and inclined plane companies. By combining fare structures and centralizing operations, Port Authority established the first unified transit system in Allegheny County. Participants Port Authority of Allegheny County would like to thank agency partners for supporting the Light Rail Transportation Station Guidelines, as well as those who participated by dedicating their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Transportation Systems: Helping Public Transit Support Welfare to Work Initiatives
    INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: HELPING PUBLIC TRANSIT SUPPORT WELFARE TO WORK INITIATIVES Jill A. Hough* Crystal Bahe Mary Lou Murphy Jennifer Swenson Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute North Dakota State University P.O. Box 5074 Fargo, ND 58105 701.231.7767 www.ugpti.org May 2002 *Hough is an Associate Research Fellow, Bahe is a Student Research Assistant, Murphy and Swenson are former UGPTI Student Research Assistants that assisted with this study. Acknowledgments The report has been prepared with funds provided by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) through the Intelligent Transportation System Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) and by the Mountain Plains Consortium (MPC). The MPC receives funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation. Other MPC member universities include North Dakota State University, Colorado State University, University of Wyoming, and Utah State University. The authors would like to thank Bridgewater State College and the Community Transportation Association of America for providing mailing lists. Thanks are extended to the many transit operators that completed the questionnaires. Thank you to Laurel Benson for assistance with the data entry. Thanks also are extended to Kiel Ova and Matthew Martimo for technical assistance in the follow-up Web-based survey. Thank you to Paul Colton of the Metropolitan Council in St. Paul, Minn., for hosting the site visit to Metro. Finally, thank you to Ayman Smadi for his helpful suggestions. Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program, and the Federal Transit Administration, in the interest of information exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Y46 Elizabeth Flyer
    Y46 ELIZABETH FLYER MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY SERVICE BUS STOPS To Downtown Pittsburgh To Century III Mall - Clairton Y46 & Y1 Downtown Stops East Carson Street at Smithfield Street Bridge Fort Pitt Boulevard past Smithfield Street Wood Street past Third Avenue btw Forbes and Fifth Avenue at Sixth Avenue Elizabeth 3rd St under Route 51 Bridge Clairton St Clair Ave at Miller Ave Century Townhomes Desiderio Blvd at Soltis Dr Jefferson Ave Worthington at Hwy Rt 51 Pleasant Hills Hwy Rt 51 at Lewis Run Rd West Mifflin Century III Mall Pleasant Hills Hwy Rt 51 at Century III Mall Pleasant Hills Hwy Rt 51 at Old Lebanon Church Rd Brentwood Hwy Rt 51 at Brownsville Rd Overbrook Glenbury St Ramp at South Busway South Hills Junction South Busway at inbound shelter Downtown Sixth Ave at Smithfield St Downtown Sixth Ave at Smithfield St South Hills Junction South Busway at outbound shelter Overbrook South Busway at Glenbury St Brentwood Hwy Rt 51 at Brownsville Rd Pleasant Hills Hwy Rt 51 at Old Clairton Rd West Mifflin Century III Mall Pleasant Hills Hwy Rt 51 opp. Century III Mall Pleasant Hills Hwy Rt 51 opp. Lewis Run Rd Jefferson Ave Worthington past Hwy Rt 51 Century Townhomes Desiderio Blvd at Soltis Dr Clairton St Clair Ave past Miller Ave Elizabeth 3rd St under Route 51 Bridge Sixth Avenue at Smithfield Street 4:28 4:33 4:36 4:43 4:48 .... 4:50 4:53 4:59 5:06 5:15 5:27 5:27 5:35 5:44 5:49 5:54 ...
    [Show full text]
  • Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation
    Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation Request for Proposals Mobile Ticketing Solution Issued: 6/10/20 Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation 130 West Grimes Lane Bloomington, Indiana 47403 1 BLOOMINGTON PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR MOBILE TICKETING PLATFORM 1. GENERAL Date of issue: 6/10/20 Proposal due date: July 9, 2020 4:00pm EST Contracting agency: Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation (BPTC) 130 W. Grimes Lane Bloomington, Indiana 47403 Funding: This project is financed through grants from the Federal Transit Administration, and any contract entered into is subject to the provisions of applicable laws governing that grant. The successful proposer and all subcontractors shall be required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Federally required contract clauses are included in Appendix A. 2. NOTICE TO PROPOSERS Proposals will be received by Bloomington Public Transportation Corporation (BPTC) for the provision of an app-based mobile ticketing platform to complement its current fare collection system. Such proposals shall be received by BPTC, 130 W. Grimes Lane, Bloomington, Indiana, 47403, until 4:00pm (EST) on July 9, 2020, at which time and place all proposals will be publicly opened. Any requests for exceptions or deviations to this RFP must be received by BPTC by June 19, 2020. Such requests for exceptions or deviations shall be subject to approval by BPTC. Otherwise, it shall be construed that items offered are in strict compliance with the specifications detailed in this RFP, and the successful offeror shall be held responsible for meeting all aspects of the RFP. BPTC reserves the following rights: to waive clarifications and exceptions in awarding a contract in the best interest of BPTC, to accept or reject any or all proposals, to waive any or all irregularities, and to award the contract to the responsive and responsible offeror whose proposal is determined by BPTC to be in its best interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Project Report Extension of Mumbai Metro Line-4 from Kasarvadavali to Gaimukh
    DETAILED PROJECT REPORT EXTENSION OF MUMBAI METRO LINE-4 FROM KASARVADAVALI TO GAIMUKH MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MMRDA) Prepared By DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. October, 2017 DETAILED PROJECT REPORT EXTENSION OF MUMBAI METRO LINE-4 FROM KASARVADAVALI TO GAIMUKH MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MMRDA) Prepared By DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. October, 2017 Contents Pages Abbreviations i-iii Salient Features 1-3 Executive Summary 4-40 Chapter 1 Introduction 41-49 Chapter 2 Traffic Demand Forecast 50-61 Chapter 3 System Design 62-100 Chapter 4 Civil Engineering 101-137 Chapter 5 Station Planning 138-153 Chapter 6 Train Operation Plan 154-168 Chapter 7 Maintenance Depot 169-187 Chapter 8 Power Supply Arrangements 188-203 Chapter 9 Environment and Social Impact 204-264 Assessment Chapter 10 Multi Model Traffic Integration 265-267 Chapter 11 Friendly Features for Differently Abled 268-287 Chapter 12 Security Measures for a Metro System 288-291 Chapter 13 Disaster Management Measures 292-297 Chapter 14 Cost Estimates 298-304 Chapter 15 Financing Options, Fare Structure and 305-316 Financial Viability Chapter 16 Economical Appraisal 317-326 Chapter 17 Implementation 327-336 Chapter 18 Conclusions and Recommendations 337-338 Appendix 339-340 DPR for Extension of Mumbai Metro Line-4 from Kasarvadavali to Gaimukh October 2017 Salient Features 1 Gauge 2 Route Length 3 Number of Stations 4 Traffic Projection 5 Train Operation 6 Speed 7 Traction Power Supply 8 Rolling Stock 9 Maintenance Facilities
    [Show full text]
  • Cuta's 2006 Fall Conference
    February/février 2007 National Transit Employee Recognition Awards 2006 · Prix nationaux de reconnaissance des employés du secteur des transports en commun 2006 CANADIAN TRANSIT CANADIEN SUR LE TRANSPORT COLLECTIF CUTA’S 2006 FALL CONFERENCE COMMUNITIES IN TRANSIT CONGRÈS D’AUTOMNE DE L’ACTU 2006 COLLECTIVITÉS EN TRANSITION PLUS: 2006 Mid-Year Ridership Results Données semestrielles 2006 de l’achalandage Quick test fact: Q’Straint rear tie-down belts along with stainless steel floor pockets and fastening hardware are static pull tested with every shipment. www.qstraint.com 312983_Qstraint.indd 1 1/3/07 12:35:10 PM We Listen, You Drive Discover the new face of performance with the line of Nova Bus transit, suburban, and shuttle vehicles. Building on our reputation for quality, our bold new front styling reflects the sound engineering and unique design features you have come to expect from every vehicle we produce. At Nova Bus, the quality is built right in. We listen, You Drive. www.novabus.com 312983_Qstraint.indd 1 1/3/07 12:35:10 PM 311734_Nova.indd 1 12/11/06 10:35:40 AM Under 30' and 35' length 12 year/500,000 mile Altoona tested 102" wide Cummins ISB-02 engine 35" front door - Vapor Optional 42" centre door Allison B300 or B300R transmission 19 – 35 passenger capacity Meritor independent front suspension KIRKMAN BUS SALES LTD. BLUE BIRD PEARSON BUS 1-888-381-3010 COACHWORKS 1-877-794-7670 CALGARY, AB 1-800-486-7122 BRANTFORD, ON 4 WESTERN CANADA EASTERN CANADA February/février 2007 Vol. 17 No. 1 CANADIAN TRANSIT CANADIEN SUR LE TRANSPORT COLLECTIF February 2007/ février 2007 CUTA Editor • Rédactrice de l’ACTU : Maureen Shuell cover • couverture Executive Editor • Rédactrice en chef : Thanks to partnerships between the various orders of government, Janine Strom new funding is making significant improvements to public transit to Contributing Editor • meet the growing needs of Canadians.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2003-04
    Contents About State Transit 3 Performance Highlights 7 Year in Review 8 CEO’s and Chairman’s Foreword 9 Reliability 12 Convenience 15 Safety and security 19 Efficiency 22 Courtesy - Customer Service 26 Comfort 33 Western Sydney Bus Services 37 Financial Statements 39 Appendices 73 Index 108 STATE TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES ANNUAL REPORT 2003 - 2004 2 About State Transit: State Transit manages one of FAQ’s the largest bus operations of any city in the world. State Transit operates 3 businesses: Sydney Buses, Newcastle Bus and Western Sydney Buses (Liverpool-Parramatta Transitway services).Sydney Ferries was separated from State Transit on 1 July 2004 and now operates as the Sydney Ferries Corporation. Bus Fleet Safety • At year end, State Transit’s bus fleet totalled 1,926 • A high priority is placed on security and safety; all buses: buses are in radio contact with a control room in - 829 are air-conditioned (43% of fleet), the Sydney Traffic Management Centre, are fitted - 661 are low floor design (34.3% of fleet), with CCTV, door safety systems and special school - 553 buses are fully wheelchair accessible bus warning systems. (28.7% of fleet), - 402 buses are CNG powered (21% of the Sydney fleet), Passenger Information - 362 buses have Euro 2 diesel engines • Individual timetables for every bus service are (18.8% of the fleet), available from the State Transit information kiosks - 51 buses have Euro 3 diesel engines (2.6% at central points in the City, selected ticket of the fleet), and agencies or off the web at www.131500.com.au or - 453 buses comply with the Euro 3 emission by phoning the Transport Infoline on 131 500.
    [Show full text]