Host Plant Effects on the Development, Survival, and Reproduction of Dysmicoccus Brevipes (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on Grapevines Author(S): A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Host Plant Effects on the Development, Survival, and Reproduction of Dysmicoccus Brevipes (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on Grapevines Author(S): A Host Plant Effects on the Development, Survival, and Reproduction of Dysmicoccus brevipes (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on Grapevines Author(s): A. Bertin , L. C. Bortoli , M. Botton , and J.R.P. Parra Source: Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 106(5):604-609. 2013. Published By: Entomological Society of America URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1603/AN13030 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. ARTHROPOD BIOLOGY Host Plant Effects on the Development, Survival, and Reproduction of Dysmicoccus brevipes (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) on Grapevines 1,2 3 3 1 A. BERTIN, L. C. BORTOLI, M. BOTTON, AND J.R.P. PARRA Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 106(5): 604Ð609 (2013); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/AN13030 ABSTRACT Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell, 1893) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) is one of the most frequent and abundant mealybugs in Brazilian vineyards, where it causes direct and indirect damage to the vines. In this study, we investigated the effect of plant structures, cultivars, and vine rootstocks on the development, survival, and reproduction of D. brevipes under laboratory conditions. Leaves of the table- grape cultivar ÔIta´liaÕ (Vitis vinifera) and ÔNia´gara RosadaÕ (Vitis labrusca) and the vine roots of the rootstocks Paulsen 1103 (Vitis berlandieri ϫ V. rupestris) and IAC 572 (Vitis caribaea ϫ 101-14 Mgt) were used as host plants. D. brevipes developed on different vegetative structures, cultivars, and vine rootstocks. D. brevipes showed the shortest developmental period and highest survival and fecundity rates on leaves of cultivar Ita´lia. Survival on leaves was signiÞcantly higher than on roots. Roots of IAC 572 were unsuitable for D. brevipes development, resulting in nonreproductive females. The mealybugsÕ longevity on leaves and vine roots was similar. Higher intrinsic and Þnite rates of increase and net reproductive rate were observed when mealybugs developed on Ita´lia leaves. We concluded that the host plant affects the development and survival of D. brevipes and that the choice of the most appropriate cultivar or vine rootstock can help to reduce pest infestation, and is therefore an additional component to be included in the integrated pest management of grapes. KEY WORDS mealybug, life cycle, cultivar, rootstock, grape Mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) have become The several species of mealybugs associated with increasingly important pests in many crops (BenÐDov grapevines in Brazil include Planococcus citri (Risso, 1994). In vineyards, they are of concern mainly because 1813), Planococcus minor (Maskell, 1897), Pseudococ- of direct infestation of table-grape clusters and indirect cus maritimus (Ehrhorn, 1900), Pseudococcus longispi- damage through virus transmission (Walton and Pringle nus (TargioniÐTozetti, 1867), Pseudococcus viburni 2004; Daane et al. 2008, 2012). Mealybugs can feed on all (Signoret, 1875), and Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cocker- parts of the vine, including the trunk, leaves, and grape ell, 1893) (Daane et al. 2012). clusters, and occasionally on roots (Godfrey et al. 2002, The identiÞcation of D. brevipes occurrence on Daane et al. 2008). Direct loss to production occurs when grapes is relatively new (Morandi Filho, 2008). This mealybugs infest fruits and excrete honeydew that cov- mealybug is primarily a pest of pineapple in Brazil ers the bunches and leaves, resulting in sooty-mold (Silva et al. 1968). On grapes, the species has been growth (Flaherty et al. 1992; Godfrey et al. 2002; Daane mainly found on roots, but it can also infest leaves and et al. 2008, 2012). In wine grapes, the presence of mealy- bunches, causing signiÞcant damage during harvest bugs does not cause economic damage, although some (Daane et al. 2012). No information is available about evidence indicates that they can modify the wine quality the life cycle of D. brevipes on grapes. Given its oc- (Bordeu et al. 2012). However, in table grapes, the pres- currence on roots, this species may be important when ence of mealybugs and the contamination resulting from replanting vineyards, which may lead to reinfestation their feeding can cause cosmetic damage to clusters, and contamination (if this species is also a virus vec- reducing marketability (Godfrey et al. 2002, Gonza´lez tor), as for Pseudococcus calceolariae (Maskell, 1879) and Volosky 2004, Daane et al. 2012). Many mealybug in New Zealand (Bell et al. 2009). In this study, we species can transmit several important grapevine viruses investigated the development, survival, and reproduc- (Cabaleiro and Segura 1997, Golino et al. 2002, Douglas tion of D. brevipes on leaves of two table-grape cul- and Kru¨ger 2008, Bertin et al. 2010), such as the leafroll tivars and roots of two vine rootstocks. viruses, which can reduce productivity and grape quality (Komar et al. 2007). Materials and Methods 1 Department of Entomology and Acarology, University of Sa˜o Maintenance of Insect Colony and Host Plants. A Paulo, 11 Pa´dua Dias Ave., Piracicaba, SP, Brazil 13418-900. colony of D. brevipes was initiated in May 2008 with 2 Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]. 3 Laboratory of Entomology, Embrapa Grape and Wine, 515 Livra- adult females originally collected from infested Þg mento St., Bento Gonc¸alves, RS, Brazil 95700-000. roots. The colony was maintained for ϳ15 generations 0013-8746/13/0604Ð0609$04.00/0 ᭧ 2013 Entomological Society of America September 2013 BERTIN ET AL.: BIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF Dysmicoccus brevipes ON GRAPES 605 on squash (Cabotia´ variety, Cucurbita maxima ϫ Cu- Table 1. Results of statistical analysis for development time curbita moschata) in controlled conditions (25 Ϯ 2ЊC, and longevity of Dysmicoccus brevipes reared on leaves and vine roots of grapes 70 Ϯ 10% relative humidity [RH], and a photoperiod of 14:10 [L:D] h). Traits Test statistic P value The varieties of table grapes that are most com- Leaf or root F (df) monly grown in Brazil were selected for the study. Leaves of the cultivars ÔItaliaÕ (Vitis vinifera) and ÔNia- First instar (development time) 2.85 (1) 0.233 ´ ´ Second instar (development time) 10.03 (1) 0.086 gara RosadaÕ (Vitis labrusca) and the vine rootstocks Third instar (development time) 43.20 (1) 0.022 Paulsen 1103 (Vitis berlandieri ϫ Vitis rupestris) and Nymphal period 19.48 (1) 0.047 IAC 572 (Vitis caribaea ϫ 101-14 Mgt) were used as Longevity 10.41 (1) 0.084 host. The bioassays were conducted by using leaves of adult plants collected in vineyards free from insecti- cide application. The vine rootstocks were cultivated knife resampling (Maia et al. 2000) and were com- in a greenhouse with one plant (1-yr-old) per con- ␣ ϭ tainer (3 liters). pared by using a t-test ( 0.05). Life-table param- Development and Survivorship. To determine the eters for D. brevipes on IAC 572 and Paulsen 1103 roots development time and survival rate of D. brevipes, were not estimated because mealybugs did not pro- adult females from the laboratory colony were isolated duce offspring when reared on IAC 572 roots and there was a low number of reproductive females on in petri dishes (diameter 6.0 cm) with Ita´lia leaf discs (diameter 3.5 cm) until oviposition. First-instar Paulsen 1103 roots. nymphs (Ͻ24-h-old) were transferred to host-plant Development time and adult longevity were ana- leaf discs (diameter 3.5 cm) and vine roots (length 4 lyzed by using nested analysis of variance of the com- cm) in petri dishes (diameter 6 cm) containing a layer bined data set, where leaves and roots were the main (1 cm) of 3% agar-water. In total, 150 nymphs were Þxed factor and the cultivars or rootstocks were the placed individually on leaf discs from each cultivar, random factor nested within leaves/roots. To test for the signiÞcance within groups (leaves or roots), a and 250 nymphs on each root piece of the vine root- ␣ ϭ stock. Mealybugs were transferred to new leaves or t-test was applied ( 0.05) (R Development Core roots every5dtoensure a supply of fresh food. Team 2012). The experiments were conducted in the laboratory The reproductive periods were analyzed with anal- Ϯ Њ Ϯ ysis of variance, followed by TukeyÕs test to separate under controlled conditions at 25 2 C, 70 10% RH, ␣ ϭ and a photoperiod of 14:10 (L:D) h. The progress of the means at 0.05. The effect of host plants on development was checked every 2 d under a binocular survival of immature stages and adult fecundity were microscope and distinguished based on the occur- analyzed Þtting a generalized linear model of the bi- rence of molting exuviae. The survival rate for each nomial and Poisson types, respectively (Nelder and stage is presented as the percentage of individuals that Wedderburn 1972). successfully developed to the next stage. The sex of individual mealybugs could not be determined at the Results egg and Þrst-crawler stages; sex could Þrst be distin- guished in the second instar, when males form a co- Development and Survivorship. No D. brevipes coon to complete their development (McKenzie males were observed from Þrst-instar nymphs main- 1967).
Recommended publications
  • Anet Newsletter 8
    30 APRIL 2006 No. 8 ANeT Newsletter International Network for the Study of Asian Ants / DIWPA Network for Social Insect Collections / DIVERSITAS in West Pacific and Asia Proceedings of Committee Meeting of 5th ANeT Workshop Minutes prepared by: Prof. Datin Dr. Maryati Mohamed Institute for Tropical Biology & Conservation Universiti Malaysia Sabah, MALAYSIA Place and Date of the Committee Meeting Committee meeting of 5th ANeT Workshop was held on 30th November 2005 at the National Museum, Kuala Lumpur. The meeting started at 12.30 with a discussion on the draft of Action Plan tabled by Dr. John Fellowes and meeting then chaired by Prof. Maryati Mohamed at 1.00 pm. Meeting adjourned at 3.00 p.m. Members Attending Prof. Maryati Mohamed, the President of ANeT (Malaysia) Prof. Seiki Yamane (Japan) Prof. Kazuo Ogata (Japan) Dr. Rudy Kohout (Australia) Dr. John R. Fellowes (Hong Kong/UK) Mr. Suputa (Indonesia) Dr. Yoshiaki Hashimoto (Japan) Dr. Decha Wiwatwitaya (Thailand) Dr. Bui Tuan Viet (Vietnam) Dr. Himender Bharti (India) Dr. Sriyani Dias (Sri Lanka) Mr. Bakhtiar Effendi Yahya, the Secretariat of ANeT (Japan) Ms. Petherine Jimbau, the Secretariat of ANeT (Malaysia) Agenda Agreed 1. Discussion on Proposal on Action Plan as tabled by Dr. John Fellowes 2. Proceedings/Journal 3. Next meeting - 6th ANeT Seminar and Meeting (date and venue) 4. New members and structure of committee membership 5. Any other business ANeT Newsletter No. 8. 30 April 2006 Agenda Item 1: Discussion on Proposal on Action Plan as tabled by Dr. John Fellowes Draft of Proposal was distributed. During the discussion no amendments were proposed to the draft Action Plan objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers OVERVIEW OF FOREST PESTS KENYA January 2007 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FBS/20E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department DISCLAIMER The aim of this document is to give an overview of the forest pest1 situation in Kenya. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO 2007 1 Pest: Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products (FAO, 2004). Overview of forest pests - Kenya TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Forest pests...................................................................................................................... 1 Naturally regenerating forests..................................................................................... 1 Insects ..................................................................................................................... 1 Diseases..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ants - White-Footed Ant (360)
    Pacific Pests and Pathogens - Fact Sheets https://apps.lucidcentral.org/ppp/ Ants - white-footed ant (360) Photo 1. White-footed ant, Technomyrmex species, Photo 2. White-footed ant, Technomyrmex species, tending an infestation of Icerya seychellarum on tending an infestation of mealybugs on noni (Morinda avocado for their honeydew. citrifolia) for their honeydew. Photo 3. White-footed ant, Technomyrmex albipes, side Photo 4. White-footed ant, Technomyrmex albipes, view. from above. Photo 5. White-footed ant, Technomyrmex albipes; view of head. Common Name White-footed ant; white-footed house ant. Scientific Name Technomyrmex albipes. Identification of the ant requires expert examination as there are several other species that are similar. Many specimens previously identified as Technomyrmex albipes have subsequently been reidentified as Technomyrmex difficilis (difficult white-footed ant) or as Technomyrmex vitiensis (Fijian white-footed ant), which also occurs worldwide. Distribution Worldwide. Asia, Africa, North and South America (restricted), Caribbean, Europe (restricted), Oceania. It is recorded from Australia, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Guam, Marshall Islands, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Pitcairn, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tokelau, Wallis and Futuna. Hosts Tent-like nests made of debris occur on the ground within leaf litter, under stones or wood, among leaves of low vegetation, in holes, crevices and crotches of stems and trunks, in the canopies of trees, and on fruit. The ants also make nests in wall cavities of houses, foraging in kitchens and bathrooms. Symptoms & Life Cycle Damage to plants is not done directly by Technomyrmex albipes, but indirectly. The ants feed on honeydew of aphids, mealybugs, scale insects and whiteflies, and prevent the natural enemies of these pests from attacking them.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Hemiptera, Pseudococcidae
    Zootaxa 964: 1–8 (2005) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 964 Copyright © 2005 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new pest of tomato and other records of mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) from Espírito Santo, Brazil MARK P. CULIK1 & PENNY J. GULLAN2 1Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa, Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural — INCAPER, Rua Afonso Sarlo 160, CEP 29052-010, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brasil, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Department of Entomology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616-8584, USA, e-mail: [email protected]. Abstract Three mealybug (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) plant pest species: Dysmicoccus boninsis (Kuwana), Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley, and Pseudococcus viburni (Signoret), are recorded for the first time in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil. This is the first record of Phenacoccus solenopsis in Bra- zil, where it was found infesting tomato plants. The species Antonina graminis (Maskell), a com- mon pest of Bermuda grass, and Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell), a major pest of pineapple, also were encountered. Key words: Antonina graminis, Dysmicoccus boninsis, Dysmicoccus brevipes, Phenacoccus sole- nopsis, Pseudococcus viburni, Solanum lycopersicum Uma nova praga do tomateiro e outros registros de cochonilhas-farinhentas (Hemi- ptera: Pseudococcidae) no Espírito Santo, Brasil Resumo: São registradas pela primeira vez a ocorrência das cochonilhas-farinhentas (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) Dysmicoccus boninsis (Kuwana), Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley, e Pseudococ- cus viburni (Signoret) no estado do Espírito Santo. Destaca-se que o registro de Phenacoccus sole- nopsis, encontrada no tomateiro, é o primeiro no Brasil. Também foram encontradas em capim Bermuda a espécie Antonina graminis (Maskell) e em abacaxi e abóbora a espécie Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell), ambas já relatadas no estado do Espírito Santo.
    [Show full text]
  • Blank Document
    Application to release the microhymenopteran parasitoid Tachardiaephagus somervillei for the control of the invasive scale insect Tachardina aurantiaca on Christmas Island, Indian Ocean Prepared by Peter T. Green, Dennis J. O’Dowd and Gabor Neumann (La Trobe University, Kingsbury Drive, Bundoora 3086) on behalf the Director of National Parks. Submitted by The Director of National Parks, for assessment by the Australian Government Department of Agriculture 1 December 2014 Contents Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..iii Preamble ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. vi Acknowledgments ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… viii 1. Information on the target species, the yellow lac scale Tachardina aurantiaca ……………………………. 1 1.1 Taxonomy ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 1.2 Description ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 1.3 Distribution ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 1.4 Australian Range ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 1.5 Ecology ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 1.6 Impacts ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 1.7 Information on all other relevant Commonwealth, State and Territory legislative controls of the target species …………………………………………………………………………… 7 1.8 When the target was approved for biological control ………………………………………………………. 7 1.9 History of biological control ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 2. Information on the potential agent Tachardiaephagus somervillei …………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Food Preference, Survivorship, and Intraspecific Interactions of Velvety Tree Ants Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/75r0k078 Author Hoey-Chamberlain, Rochelle Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Food Preference, Survivorship, and Intraspecific Interactions of Velvety Tree Ants A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology by Rochelle Viola Hoey-Chamberlain December 2012 Thesis Committee: Dr. Michael K. Rust, Chairperson Dr. Ring Cardé Dr. Gregory P. Walker Copyright by Rochelle Viola Hoey-Chamberlain 2012 The Thesis of Rochelle Viola Hoey-Chamberlain is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In part this research was supported by the Carl Strom Western Exterminator Scholarship. Thank you to Jeremy Brown for his assistance in all projects including collecting ant colonies, setting up food preference trials, setting up and collecting data during nestmate recognition studies and supporting other aspects of the field work. Thank you also to Dr. Les Greenburg (UC Riverside) for guidance and support with many aspects of these projects including statistics and project ideas. Thank you to Dr. Greg Walker (UC Riverside) and Dr. Laurel Hansen (Spokane Community College) for their careful review of the manuscript. Thank you to Dr. Subir Ghosh for assistance with statistics for the survival study. And thank you to Dr. Paul Rugman-Jones for his assistance with the genetic analyses. iv ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Food Preference, Survivorship, and Intraspecific Interactions of Velvety Tree Ants by Rochelle Viola Hoey-Chamberlain Master of Science, Graduate Program in Entomology University of California, Riverside, December 2012 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • FICHA TÉCNICA Dysmicoccus Neobrevipes
    FICHA TÉCNICA Dysmicoccus neobrevipes (Bearsley, 1959) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) Cochinilla gris Créditos: Joshi, s/a, Rung, 2018 . CONTENIDO IDENTIDAD DE LA PLAGA ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 1 Nombre científico ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Sinonimias ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Clasificación taxonómica ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Nombre común ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 ESTATUS FITOSANITARIO EN MÉXICO ............................................................................................................................................. 1 IMPORTANCIA ECONÓMICA DE LA PLAGA ................................................................................................................................. 2 DISTRIBUCIÓN MUNDIAL .......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Protection Compendium USDA Aphis the World’S Most Comprehensive Site for Crop Signed in Via: Protection Information Username/Password
    20/6/2014 Dysmicoccus brevipes Other CABI sites Home Overview About Help Contact Mobile Sign out You are signed in as: Crop Protection Compendium USDA Aphis The world’s most comprehensive site for Crop Signed in via: Protection Information Username/Password Datasheets Abstracts Full Text Library Glossary More Resources Datasheet report print back Dysmicoccus brevipes Pictures Top of page Picture Title Caption Copyright Infestation Heavy infestations conspicuous because of white waxy adults which often occur at growing points, around Crown on stem nodes, on undersides of leaves, on fruit and on roots - pictured here on pineapple, Ivory Coast. Copyright pineapple Identity Top of page Preferred Scientific Name Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell, 1893) Preferred Common Name pineapple mealybug Other Scientific Names Dactylopius (Pseudococcud) ananassae Kuwana Dactylopius brevipes Cockerell, 1893 Dactylopius bromeliae Dysmicoccus bromeliae Auct. Dysmicoccus cannae Dysmicoccus pseudobrevipes (Mamet) Pseudococcus brevipes (Cockerell), Fernald, 1903 Pseudococcus bromeliae Pseudococcus cannae Green, 1934 Pseudococcus longirostralis James, 1936 Pseudococcus missionum Cockerell, 1910 Pseudococcus palauensis Kanda, 1933 Pseudococcus pseudobrevipes Mamet, 1941 International Common Names Spanish: chinche harinosa de la piña, escama harinosa de la piña, palomilla de la raiz de la piña, piojo harinoso de la piña French: cochenille farineuse de l'ananas Local Common Names Brazil: cochonilha do abacaxizeiro, cochonilha pulverulenta do abacaxi Germany: ananas-schmierlaus
    [Show full text]
  • Standards Committee
    REPORT (REVISED 2016-01-06, SECTION 11.3) Standards Rome, Italy Committee 16-20 November 2015 November, 2015 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations SC November 2015 Report Contents 1. Opening of the meeting .............................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Welcome by the IPPC Secretariat ............................................................................... 4 1.2 Election of the Rapporteur .......................................................................................... 5 1.3 Adoption of the Agenda Chairperson .......................................................................... 5 2. Administrative Matters ............................................................................................................... 5 3. Updates ....................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Items arising from governance bodies......................................................................... 5 3.2 Briefings from IPPC Secretariat .................................................................................. 6 4. Draft ISPMs for recommendation to CPM (from Substantial concerns commenting period) .... 9 4.1 2014 Amendments to ISPM 5 (Glossary of phytosanitary terms) (1994-001) ........... 9 4.2 Draft ISPM on Determination of host status of fruit to fruit fly (Tephritidae) (2006- 031), Priority 1 .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Jahn and Beardsley
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa APROCNTS. ANDHAWAIIAN MEALYBUG ENTOMOL ON .P SINEAPPLEOC. (2000) 34:161–165 161 Interactions of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Mealybugs (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) on Pineapple Gary C. Jahn1 and John W. Beardsley Department of Entomology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA 1Current address: Intl. Rice Res. Institute, MCPO Box 3127, Makati City 1271, Philippines Abstract. Ant and mealybug interactions were studied in a pineapple field near Honolua on the island of Maui, Hawaii. Big-headed ants (Pheidole megacephala (F.)) were found to have a positive association with gray pineapple mealybugs (Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley) but no association with pink pineapple mealybugs (D. brevipes (Cockerell)). Sticky trap collections revealed that D. neobrevipes and D. brevipes are dispersed by the wind. Field experiments indicated that both species of mealybugs could establish on pineapple plants, even in the absence of ants. The positive associa- tion between P. megacephala and D. neobrevipes was not due to ants transporting mealybugs, but could have resulted from ants deterring natural enemies or removing honeydew. Keywords: ant, mealybug, pineapple, symbiosis Introduction There is evidence that the gray pineapple mealybug, Dysmicoccus neobrevipes Beardsley, and the pink pineapple mealybug, Dysmicoccus brevipes (Cockerell), transmit wilt disease of pineapple (Carter 1963, Illingworth 1931, Ito 1959, 1962, Ullman et al. 1989). These mealybugs have a worldwide distribution and are found in most areas where pineapples are grown, including: Jamaica, most of South and Central America, East Africa, West Africa, South Africa, the Philippines, Thailand, and Hawaii (Beardsley 1993; Carter 1935, 1942; Jahn 1992; Petty 1990; Réal 1959; Serrano 1934).
    [Show full text]
  • Sucking Pests of Pineapple and Their Management- a Review
    Kalmesh Managanvi et al, International Journal of Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology, Vol.2 Issue.10, October- 2015, pg. 35-48 ISSN: 2348-1358 Impact Factor: 6.057 Sucking Pests of Pineapple and their Management- A Review 1Kalmesh Managanvi; 2Anil Kumar*; 3Paras Nath; 4P. K. Yadav; 5Rajesh Kumar 1Dr. Kalam Agricultural College, Kishanganj 2,3,4,5 Bhola Paswan Shastri Agricultural College, Purnea (Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur-813 210) *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Abstract: Pineapple herbaceous, perennial plant of the tropical and subtropical area. Pineapples grow as a small shrub and the plant is normally propagated from the offset produced at the top of the fruit or from side shoot. The fruit are eaten fresh where available and in canned form worldwide which is the only source of bromelain, an enzyme used in pharmaceuticals and as meat tenderising agent. Common sucking pests infesting vegetative propagules are mealybugs, scale and pineapple red mites. The successful management of pineapple pests is based on their correct identification and an understanding of how damage occurs. Amongst the sucking pest mealy bugs are the utmost important insect pest of pineapple in many countries while others may reach threshold levels in certain favourable conditions causing serious crop damage. Keywords: Pineapple, Sucking Pests, Management Introduction: Pineapple (Ananascomosus), is self-sterile, herbaceous, monocotyledonous, perennial plant of the family Bromeliaceae. Pineapple is originated in tropical and subtropical America and has been introduced to all other places. Pineapples cultivated as a small shrub; the separate flowers of the unpollinated plant fuse to form a multiple fruit. The plant is normally propagated from the offset produced at the top of the fruit, or from side shoot and typically mature within a year.
    [Show full text]