IJRSS Vol29 P1 Dec18 Leyla
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Dec. 2018. Vol. 29. No.1 ISSN-2307-227X International Journal of Research In Social Sciences © 2013-2019 IJRSS & K.A.J. All rights reserved www.ijsk.org/ijrss TRACING THE HISTORICAL MULTI-LAYEREDNESS THROUGH THE CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE AND MATERIALS OF EDIFICES IN AMASYA 1DR. LEYLA ETYEMEZ CIPLAK 1Inst. Dr., Department of Architecture, Cankaya University, Ankara, TURKEY E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The major subject of this study is understanding the physical evidences of the historical multi-layeredness in historic settlement of Amasya through the used construction techniques and materials in different edifices from succeeding periods. Keywords: Historical Multi-Layeredness, Construction Technique and Material, Historic Buildings, Historic Multi-Layered Settlements, Amasya. 1. INTRODUCTION between the mountains of Harşena and Ferhat, about 400m above the sea-level. Multi-layered historic settlements are the outcome of continual historical periods whose remaining edifices are stratified and integrated with the latter periods elements while constituting the current urban structure. In order to understand and evaluate this multi-layered character in current settlement, the urban history of the settlement is the main issue to be comprehended. Afterwards, for the identification of the urban historic periods and revealing the historical stratification of the settlement, a diachronic documentation1 is needed. As a consequence, this documentation and study can provide a basis for revealing the historically Figure 1: Figure 1: Topography of Amasya stratified areas which contain the physical remains (http://www.yesilirmak.org.tr, last accessed on 09.12.2018) representing the multi-layered character. Subsequently, by examining the construction technique and materials of the edifices in these The most obvious geographical aspects of areas, the physical evidences of different periods as Amasya are, the hilly mountains surrounding the the identification of the mutli-layeredness can be settlement and the Yeşilırmak River which splits the traced. land and shapes the Yeşilırmak Valley. The alluvial carried by the river forms the flat lands along the Yesilırmak Valley. As a result of its natural features, 2. BRIEF LOOK ON AMASYA providing military security and fruitful lands, Amasya has always been a significant settlement in Amasya, as a multi-layered historic settlement, the region. is found in the inner part of the Black Sea region of Turkey. The neighbor cities of Amasya are Samsun The settlement is in the primary earthquake on the north, Tokat on the east and south-east, zone of Turkey by being on the fault line of North Çorum on the west and Yozgat in the south. The Anatolia. Since the settlement centre is located on a settlement was established in the Yesilırmak valley strong limestone rock formation, the extensive 1 Diachronic documentation means the documentation of each itself in order to juxtapose the current settlement with these period separately for understanding the integrity of each period in historical periods and reveal the physical evidences (Bilgin, 1996) 1 Dec. 2018. Vol. 29. No.1 ISSN-2307-227X International Journal of Research In Social Sciences © 2013-2019 IJRSS & K.A.J. All rights reserved www.ijsk.org/ijrss effects of earthquakes limitedly affected Amasya. period the city flourished as an education centre of The two earliest documented earthquakes were in the sons of Ottoman sultans constituting it as a 236 BC and 509 BC, respectively during Roman significant administrative centre. Through its Periods (Kuzucular, 1994). Any major earthquake history, the city expansion is developed at most in was recorded until 16th. But, after the 16th century this period. Mosques, schools, governmental, many earthquakes were recorded, the biggest were military and commercial buildings were built (Urak, in the 1668 AD and 1939 AD of which the centre 1994). was Erzincan (Demirçay, 1954). Figure 3: A restitutive representation of Amasya in antiquity (http://www.yesilirmak.org.tr, last accessed on Figure 2: Geological map of Amasya (Bektas, 2001) 09.12.2018) Amasya has been continuously inhabited since After the 19th century, the historic urban the Chalcolithic Era (5500BC-3800BC) starting structure of the city started to dissolve. Primarily, from the peak of the Harşena Mountain because of after the 1913 fire which destroyed almost one third the advantages for the military security. Following of city, the urban development process was the constructed fortifications in the Hellenistic enhanced. In mid-20th century, by the establishment period, the settlement extended and towards the of the Republic of Turkey, the rapid urban Yesilırmak River and Herşena Mountain’s south development and renovations in the technologies, foothills. In the Hellenistic period Amasya was a tools and approaches of construction and planning, capital city and enlarged towards the four directions the natural process of urban development and within the borders of the topographical thresholds. transformation had been interrupted. The railway In this period, the city financially developed and road, new large roads and public areas, new construction activities were accelerated. Rock buildings with larger mass proportions were erected. Tombs, castle, Alçak Bridge and the city walls were In the most of these new cases, the result was the remains of this period. Successively, in the Roman loss of different historical and archaeological period the city was also an important settlement on heritage. the passage way of commercial route. In the Roman period, the settlement was enlarged towards the 3. DIACHRONIC DOCUMENTATION OF topographical thresholds. City walls, roman baths, AMASYA temples, tombs, altars, cisterns were constructed. (Yaşar, 2007), (Kuzucular, 1994) In Amasya the first settled area was on the peak of Harşena Mountain by Hittites. After Hittites, Afterwards, in the Byzantine Period the city Phrygians ruled the city and extended settled area became a religious centre and churches, monasteries towards the outside the city walls (Özdemir C. , and bridges were constructed. After the 7th century 2007, p. 10). As a consequence of the topographical BC the city shrunk into the city walls due to the features of the land there could only be a invasions. After the conquest of Danishmends the hypothetical street parallel to the river. According to city was declared as a capital city, the settlement Kuzucular there had been a bridge far away to the area was expanded again. Subsequently, in Seljuk, settlement on the north-east linking the street Ilkhanids and Eretna Principality period the city coming from Tokat to Samsun (1994, p. 14). became a cultural and production centre. Mosques, medreses, hospitals, hamams, fountains and tombs were built (Kuzucular, 1994). Then, in the Ottoman 2 Dec. 2018. Vol. 29. No.1 ISSN-2307-227X International Journal of Research In Social Sciences © 2013-2019 IJRSS & K.A.J. All rights reserved www.ijsk.org/ijrss Furthermore, a Phrygian temple on the south side of Roman Period that, Amasya was an important the river on the ancient road is predicted.2 commercial centre and a rich settlement. Therefore, many structures should have been constructed. However only known edifices are a roman bath and a Goddess Temple, where now the Bayezid Complex and the Municipality building is located (Kuzucular, 1994, p. 121) Figure 4: Figure 4: Diachronic plan of Periods Before the Hellenistic Period in Amasya (Etyemez, 2011, p. 77) During the Hellenistic Period, city was ruled by Pontus Kingdom and extended towards the outside of the fortifications and towards the south side of the river by referring to the Alçak Bridge which was Figure 6: Diachronic plan of Roman Period in Amasya (Etyemez, 2011, p. 80) built. The citadel, city walls and the bridge belonging to earlier periods were restored. During the Byzantine Period, the metropolis Additionally, the rock tombs, the current form of the character of the city has continued while becoming citadel and the palace, which represents the also a religious centre. Many churches and two new developing administrative organization of the bridges Helkıs and Magdenus bridges are the settlement, were constructed in this period. edifices claimed to have been constructed. Moreover, the settled area on the south of the river According to Kuzucular, the names of few of these was a rural, slum area with low density but it is churches are known. The locations of these churches known that due to the financial developments, the are being supposed with accordance to the current city had expanded towards these topographical names of the quarters at the present (1994, p. 24). thresholds (Kuzucular, 1994, p. 94). One other urban element stated to exist in this period is the aqueduct, which was on south-west, north-east axis on the south of river (Özdemir C. , 2007, p. 136). Figure 7: Diachronic plan of Byzantine Period in Amasya (Etyemez, 2011, p. 81) Figure 5: Diachronic plan of Pontus Kingdom Period in Besides the remains in the city walls, another Amasya (Etyemez, 2011, p. 78) in-situ remain from this period is Fethiye Mosque which was a church and converted into a mosque in Due to the battles for adding Amasya to the Danishmend Period. Afterwards, in 7th century Roman territories the castle and city walls were together with the Arab invasions the city started to demolished. Then these structures were reconstructed shrink towards the inside of the city walls. Between due to the advantages of military and security