The Telecommunications Industry in 1993: the Year of the Merger

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Telecommunications Industry in 1993: the Year of the Merger THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY IN 1993: THE YEAR OF THE MERGER Erin M. Reilly "Vision is trivial. Doing it is the hard part." join forces with cable television carriers, invest in - James L. Barksdale' cellular, and establish wireless consortiums. At the same time, AT&T has its eye on the local loop Experiencing unprecedented change in an era of where competition is intensifying and where the convergence, the telecommunications industry will RBOCs currently control ninety-eight percent of all 2 long remember 1993 as the year of the merger. The local service.' mergers of today permit the efficient and economical The pending union of AT&T and McCaw, a exchange of technology in an era where the liquida- $12.6 billion stock swap announced August 18, tion of billions of corporate dollars to acquire entire 1993,9 promises to create a nationwide wireless net- companies is no longer practical. The abundance of work that will result in formidable new competition recent mergers can be distinguished from the merg- to existing cellular operators. AT&T's proposed ers and acquisitions of the past decade in two re- merger, the fifth largest in United States history, 0 spects: 1) the majority of these mergers are "strategic establishes a combination of wireless and long dis- alliances, usually within the acquirer's own industry tance that is bound to shake up the $7.8 billion cel- and are aimed at creating an even stronger resulting lular industry.1 entity;"8 and 2) these mergers involve market shares The merger comes at a time when the other large rather than cash as "the currency of choice in most long-haul players, namely MCI and Sprint, have 4 deals." These deals are being forged out of a desire also decided to invest in cellular and wireless tech- to control information, data and services through do- nology. The technological investments of the three minion over both the medium and the means of dominant interexchange carriers ("IXCs") could re- distribution.' sult in significantly lower prices and new service op- Mergers such as that of AT&T-McCaw, if suc- tions for the consumer. The telecommunications cessful, promise to incite the Regional Bell Operat- companies are competing for what they see as the ing Companies ("RBOCs")' into unbridled competi- ultimate goal-"universal follow-me roaming"-a tion among themselves, as they attempt to challenge wireless phone service that can operate at any time AT&T's dominance over the long-distance market, and in any location.'2 ' Anthony Ramirez, Deal May Quicken Pace of Wireless tion of AT&T's twenty-two Bell Operating Companies (BOCs) Revolution, N.Y. TIMES, Aug. 18, 1993, at D5. Mr. Barksdale is following divestiture in 1984. United States v. American Tele- the President and Chief Operating Officer of McCaw, and will phone & Telegraph Co., 552 F. Supp. 131 (D.C. Cir. 1982), be the head of AT&T's wireless operations. John T. Mulqueen, afl'd sub nom. Maryland v. United States, 460 U.S. 1001 Users Skeptical of Mega-Merger Payoff, COMM. WEEK, Aug. (1983). 23, 1993, at 146. 1 The local loop extends from the central office of the local 2 It has been described as a "feeding frenzy." Mary E. exchange to the end user and back to the exchange. In re Policy Thyfault, It's Your Call - A Second Communications Revolu- and Rules Concerning Rates for Dominant Carriers, Memoran- tion Will Offer Business True Freedom of Choice, INFO. WEEK, dum Opinion and Order, 8 FCC Rcd. 7474, para. 128 (1993). Jan. 3, 1994, at 13, (quoting John Loewenberg, CIO of Aetna B Thyfault, supra note 2, at 12. Information at Aetna Life & Casualty Co. in Hartford, Conn.) * Eileen Messmer & Bob Wallace, AT&T Grabs All of ' Gregory Zuckerman, At Long Last, M&A Activity Turns McCaw, NETWORK WORLD, Aug. 23, 1993, at 31. Positively Feverish, INVESTMENT DEALERS' DIGEST, Oct. 18, 10 Id. 1993, at 21. 1 Hyatt, AT&T Heads Home Again; For Consumers, 4 Id. at 21, 22. Josh Jack Egan, Merger Mania Entertains Hollywood, U.S. the Merger Could Offer a Wide Array of New Competition, NEWS & WORLD REP., Oct. 25, 1993, at 48. BOSTON GLOBE, Aug. 17, 1993, at 33. ' The current seven RBOCs are the result of the consolida- 12 Id. COMMLAW CONSPECTUS [Vol. 2 Bell Atlantic's proposed $26 billion stock swap to force the smaller competitors out of the game. with TCI, a merger of the giant regional phone com- Significantly, these mergers may reflect a desire on pany and the nation's largest cable television con- the part of many communications companies to re- glomerate, came to a halt on February 23, 1993, treat to the vertical integration practices that are when the two companies were unable to agree on a characteristic of the pre-divestiture Bell System.18 In price tag for the deal. The two companies announced their attempts to achieve sheer economic omnipo- that the Federal Communication Commission's tence over the rest of the industry, merging compa- ("FCC" or "Commission") recent decision to slash nies have the potential for substantial private advan- cable prices by seven percent significantly reduced tage at the expense of the public interest. If the value of TCI's cable properties.1" permitted, these mergers may succeed in stifling The proposed merger was an even larger bid for competition in the marketplace, rather than enhanc- digital-era dominance than that of AT&T-Mc- ing it-the very danger that Judge Harold Greene Caw,14 and had been labeled the boldest gamble yet sought to protect through the 1982 Modified Final on the coming convergence of computers, telecommu- Judgment ("MFJ"). 9 nications and the media." In its desire to bring This Comment seeks to explore the significance of about a revolution in home entertainment and infor- these mergers as the communications industry heads mation through digital technology, and to become a towards an era of convergence and technological programming powerhouse in the world of interactive revolution. Part I explains the technological innova- media, Bell Atlantic had hoped, and yet may succeed tions that have served as a catalyst for the mergers. with another partner, to set the standard for the cre- It then discusses the implications of both telephone ation of a modern communications company, the company ("telco") and cable mergers on the MFJ, likes of which the industry has never seen. 6 and the possibility of a reversal or revision of the This onslaught of mergers can be attributed to MFJ as AT&T attempts to regain its footing within several different factors. The wave of new technol- the local loop and the RBOCs seek access to the in- ogy, ranging from cellular and wireless to digital and terexchange marketplace. fiber optics, has spurred on this era of merger hyste- Part II examines the role that the AT&T-McCaw ria, compelling communications companies to pool merger is playing in the migration towards wireless both technological and economic resources in order communications and the impact this merger will to compete more effectively. However, the reason have on the cellular market and the bypassing of the provided for many of these mergers-to advance local loop. Part II also analyzes the effect that cable technological achievements and to speed up the arri- and telco mergers will have on the union of the two val of the "information superhighway" -may sim- industries, altering forever the landscape of the local' ply be an excuse for controlling the technology, be- exchange. It then discusses the abundance of other cause by doing so, mega-companies are more likely industry mergers of noteworthy significance, includ- '" Sandra Sugawara & Paul Farhi, Bell Atlantic, TCI Call pliers, customers and competitors. Id. Off Merger, WASH. POST, Feb. 24, 1993, at Al. However, because some vertical mergers may be the result of 14 Linda Grant, A Surge in Shares Drives the Deals, U.S. internal expansion, a practice generally unchallengeable under NEWS & WORLD REP., Oct. 25, 1993, at 49. antitrust law, only those vertical mergers whose anticompetitive 6 Mark Landler & Bart Ziegler, Bell Ringer! How Bell At- practices outweigh possible advantages may be legally prohib- lantic and TCI Hooked Up-And What It Means for the Infor- ited. Id. at 344. mation Age, Bus. WEEK, Oct. 25, 1993, at 33-34. 1" United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 16 Id. at 36. 552 F. Supp. 131 (D.C. Cir. 1982), afPd sub nom. Maryland v. 17 Sugawara & Farhi, supra note 13, at Al. Bell Atlantic United States, 460 U.S. 1001 (1983). The MFJ modified the Chairman and CEO Raymond Smith stated that the proposed 1956 Consent Decree (United States v. Western Electric Co., merger with TCI would speed up the arrival of the information Civil Action No. 17-49, C.A. 82-0192 (D.C. Cir. 1956)) of a superhighway. Id. 1948 antitrust lawsuit against AT&T, which had limited the 18 See generally Louis Galambos, Theodore M. Vail and the company to providing regulated common carrier communications Role of Innovation in the Modern Bell, Bus. His. REV., Mar. services only, and precluded Western Electric from manufactur- 22, 1992. Vertical integration usually occurs when a company ing equipment other than that used by the Bell System. In es- acquires another company that is either a customer or supplier, sence, the terms of the MFJ restricted AT&T to providing in- an act which may substantially foreclose competition. ERNEST terexchange (long-distance) services. The RBOCs were GELLHORN, ANTITRUST LAW & ECONOMICS, IN A NUTSHELL permitted to provide exchange telecommunications and exchange SERIES 342-43 (3d ed.
Recommended publications
  • Basic Meridian 61C Configuration Example
    174543 Basic Meridian 61C Configuration Example Key ParIS Listing for a 9-1-1 Conliguration (I) Top Cap Module: provides air e"haust and environmental monitoring. Redundant 61C ullng Motorola'Iaa060 Call Processor and Releale 23 loftware (2) Inlelli.ont Peripheral Equipmenl: contain. tholrunk.line and :\IF cards. (2 Columnlor 1 Bay) (al Dici••' liM Canh (NTaOUUI)o Each aid ,~m 16 Voice 3M 16 DIU! portS I'. Tna.k ell"1I fNYIOU ••). Ext. ~ suppiOfU II Tnriu Ie) ~"'d·fl"fq~'· (ilreh INTACJ'M~ This card 4tmdn the ~tF lO.nct uKd in '101·1 ANI. 1 QN per columll cd) TI c••nl'lft'll rriwlll~ Rlill' ..",..tan CilnII - Uted 10 dcl;"'cr C.ller lD 10 the PSAP (dl 'ttip""nl [~ifllM'" ' ....r/R", Cue"'." ~nD2IAB)' One ror. each IPE shelf. (1) Top CapModule (el COIll,rOUtr Clint t~nDlIliC). Pro, ide!; itlterf3C"'K bcI"ecn lhe Supcrloop S,-"",on. Card;and the IPE ~odule. (1/ Top C.p "'pOOle to IP£·,\tAX (~TI RII1IA). (O...io...I) (NT7000BAI (I) CCR·IP[ (NTI RlllllA" tOpC","IIU (NT7000BA) (3) CoreF."etwork ~Iodule: contain. a "olorola 68060 CPL:, 'Iemory. Di.k/CD ROM, Superloop 7Iletwork cards., (;1) C.,.,fT.rw .,,,1 Dicil ~..r"J fNTlIDI7).. One fot QCh COrcINCf"OB .\1oduk. This card P'O' Mfa d;altonc,1Pd de,ock's ,he: DThIF lann (2) hleUigeT1l Peripheral (bl SUIMr'tMp Su...", C.rlb (NT.DU.-.A). One (or lOxh Corc:JNet ~lodule Pnn ides 01 lime Ilice (or each QII ~ pmcc:ss EqUipment Module te) C.....'III [14uip_.t ' ...eor (I'liInD~A.'" PO" a' (or the Cof'dNC1 !\lodulc(S) (NT8037EC) 2) htelligent Peripheral (d) "ull'~,..'1lftM Seri.1 Oat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout, 50 Hastings L.J
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 50 | Issue 6 Article 5 1-1999 The aM gnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout Jim Chen Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jim Chen, The Magnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout, 50 Hastings L.J. 1503 (1999). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol50/iss6/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. The Magnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout by JIM CHEN* Table of Contents I. High N oon .................................................................................. 1504 II. The Gunslingers, Then and Now ...................... 1506 A. The Opening Round ........................................................... 1507 B. The Magnificent Seven ...................................................... 1511 (1) POTS and PANS, Hedgehogs and Foxes ................... 1511 (2) Lord Low Everything Else ................. 1513 III. The Legal Mothers of Merger Mania ...................................... 1514 A. Statutory Starters .............. ............ 1515 (1) Section 251 and Allied Provisions ............................... 1516 (2) Section 271: BOC Entry into InterLATA Carriage .1519 * Professor of Law and Vance K. Opperman Research
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Interconnection Matrix
    TEBEAU AFFIDAVIT – ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT B PACIFIC BELL SUMMARY WIRELINE INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT LIST Section 271 Application Interconnection Agreements CLEC/Agreement Signed Date Agr. A.L./Appl/ Approval/ Term Expiration Filed Decision No. Effective Date CPUC Date 1. @Link Networks, Inc. (formerly Dakota 7/5/00 A.L. 3 EFF. 7/26/00 -- 03/14/01 Services) (Int. Agr. - S. 252 – MFN to Prism California Operations)** 2. 01 Communications (formerly Option One) 1/7/00 A.L. 3 EFF. 1/23/00 -- 06/29/01 (Int. Agr. - Sec. 252 - MFN to Pac-West)** 3. 1-800-RECONEX (Resale Agr.-Sec. 252- MFN 4/28/00 A.L. 1 EFF. 5/14/00 -- 02/10/01 to NOW)** 4. 2 nd Century (Int. Agreement - Section 252 - 5/26/00 A.L. 1-A EFF. 6/17/00 -- See MFN to WorldCom Technologies)** WorldCom 5. Access One (Interconnection Agreement - Sec. 9/1/00 A.L. 21360 APP. 11/21/00 10/31/01 252) Res. T-16468 EFF. 12/1/00 6. Adelphia Business Solutions Operations, Inc. 4/19/00 A. L. 3 EFF. 5/13/00 -- 06/29/01 (Int. Agr.- Sec. 252 - MFN to Pac West)** 7. Advanced Data Communications (Resale Agr. - 9/14/99 A.L. 20571 APP. 10/21/99 -- 11/28/00 Sec. 252) Agr. Signed Sept. 3, 1999 Res. T-16358 EFF. 10/31/99 8. Advanced Telcom Group, Inc. (Int. Agr.-Sec. 12/9/98 A.L. 19872 Res. T-16270 -- 07/03/00 252 - MFN to ACN) Agr. Signed 12/1/98 EFF. 2/18/99 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Centurylink Weighs More Expansion of Prism TV Service•
    EXHIBIT 7 Press Coverage and News Articles AUSWRNews Page 1 of 1 AUSWR THE AssociATION oF U S WEsT RETIREES CenturyLink weighs more expansion of Prism TV service• By Andy Vuong The Denver Post May 6, 2011 Centurylink chief executive Glen Post indicated during a first-quarter earnings call Thursday that the next market to receive Centurylink's IPTV service will probably be in Qwest's local-phone service territory. And the rollout could come as early as this year. Post said the company expanded the service, called Prism TV, in the first quarter to three new markets: Tallahassee and Orlando, Fla., and Raleigh, N.C. Prism TV, which offers video content over a dedicated Internet network, is available in eight Legacy Centurylink!Embarq markets. Centurylink purchased Embarq in 2009 and completed its acquisition of Denver-based Qwest on April1. Post said the company will continue to expand Prism TV in 2011, ultimately reaching 1 million homes with the service by year's end. However, in response to a question from an analyst, Post said the company does not expect "any additional rollouts in the Centurylink markets" this year. "We'll be evaluating the Qwest markets in the coming months," Post said. "We do think there could be some opportunity there . .. We'll be making those decisions around midyear as far as any additional rollouts of IPTV in any of those markets." Andy Vuong:·303-954 -1209\.\ls, [email protected] or twitter.comlandwuonq http://www.uswestret iree.org/5 8112.htm 9/4/2013 Printer Friendly Version Page 1 of2 Published Apr I, 20 II Published Friday April I , 20 II CenturyLink aims to win market By Ross Boettcher WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER TOTAL ACCESS UNES -!f,,e;;t - {)().>; Ct'l'l ~:l"ni::afi ~ns ~';:::':....~ W~f1dstrenm \St'lm ~~ ~r~fil AJrc;;: ~'1! '001 2CIV.i 2002 2003 t.C•J.i 2005 2COS 2CV1 2c.o·~ 2CV£1 2010 I' \ ' ' 1 .- I H' 1 I ) I ~\c.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankruptcy Monitor's Report on the Nortel IP Auction
    Court File No. 09-CL-7950 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF COMPROMISE OR ARRANGEMENT OF NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION, NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED, NORTEL NETWORKS GLOBAL CORPORATION, NORTEL NETWORKS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND NORTEL NETWORKS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION SEVENTY-FIRST REPORT OF THE MONITOR DATED JULY 6, 2011 INTRODUCTION 1. On January 14, 2009 (the “Filing Date”), Nortel Networks Corporation (“NNC” and collectively with all its subsidiaries “Nortel” or the “Company”), Nortel Networks Limited (“NNL”), Nortel Networks Technology Corporation (“NNTC”), Nortel Networks International Corporation and Nortel Networks Global Corporation (collectively the “Applicants”) filed for and obtained protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”). Pursuant to the Order of this Honourable Court dated January 14, 2009, as amended and restated (the “Initial Order”), Ernst & Young Inc. was appointed as the Monitor of the Applicants (the “Monitor”) in the CCAA proceedings. The stay of proceedings was extended to December 14, 2011, by this Honourable Court in its Order dated June 30, 2011. 2. Nortel Networks Inc. (“NNI”) and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries and affiliates concurrently filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “U.S. Court”) on January 14, 2009 (the “Chapter 11 Proceedings”). As required by U.S. law, an official unsecured creditors committee (the “Committee”) was established in January, 2009. 3. An ad hoc group of holders of bonds issued by NNL, NNC and Nortel Networks Capital Corporation has been organized and is participating in these proceedings as well as the Chapter 11 Proceedings (the “Bondholder Group”).
    [Show full text]
  • Qwest Corporation D/B/A Centurylink QC (C) P.U.C
    Qwest Corporation d/b/a CenturyLink QC (C) P.U.C. OREGON NO. 33 TITLE PAGE EXCHANGE AND 1st Revised Sheet 1 NETWORK SERVICES Cancels Original Sheet 1 TERMS, CONDITIONS, RATES AND CHARGES Applying to the provision of EXCHANGE AND NETWORK SERVICES within the operating territory of QWEST CORPORATION d/b/a CenturyLink QC (C) whether offered under that name, or the trade or brand name CenturyLink (N) in the State of OREGON ADOPTION NOTICE (N) Effective April 4, 2011, Qwest Corporation registered the fictitious name CenturyLink (T) QC. Effective August 8, 2011, Qwest Corporation began operating under the name CenturyLink QC. As such, Qwest Corporation d/b/a CenturyLink QC hereby adopts, ratifies, and makes its own, in every respect as if the same had been originally filed by it, all schedules, rules, notices, concurrences, schedule agreements, divisions, authorities or other instruments whatsoever, filed with the Oregon Public Utility Commission. (T) By this notice, Qwest Corporation d/b/a CenturyLink QC also adopts and ratifies all (N) supplements or amendments to any of the above schedules, etc., which Qwest Corporation has heretofore filed with said Commission. (N) Advice No. 2100 Issued by Qwest Corporation Effective: August 8, 2011 By J. A. Peppler Title: President - Oregon Qwest Corporation P.U.C. OREGON NO. 33 PREFACE SHEET EXCHANGE AND 1st Revised Sheet 1 NETWORK SERVICES Cancels Original Sheet 1 RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE (T) (D) (D) (D) Advice No. 2073 Issued by Qwest Corporation Effective: November 1, 2008 By J. A. Peppler Title: President - Oregon Qwest Corporation P.U.C. OREGON NO.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSWR Mission Centurylink to Continue Retiree 'Cap” for Post
    2012 ISSUE 2 CenturyLink To Continue Retiree ‘Cap” for Post-1990 Medicare Management 5-Year Agreement “To Not Reduce Health Benefit” INSIDE In what is called a “partnering proposal,” AUSWR and CenturyLink announced that man- 2 — AUSWR Pres. agement Medicare-eligible retirees (and eligible Appreciation spouses and dependents) who retired after 1990, 3 — CenturyLink now have their health care subsidy payment Annual Shareholder (known as the Cap) protected through March 31, Meeting May 23 2017. Non-Medicare management who retire after 1990 are included in the Agreement. 4— Retirees’ ‘Horror’ Stories Over Health- The post-1990 Medicare-eligible man- care Changes agement retirees were eliminated from the Com- pany health care plan in the 2012 Open Enroll- 5— Help to Access ment period at the end of last year and shifted to the Service Center the Medicare open market to select a plan avail- 6—About to go onto able in their area. Medicare? CenturyLink provides a reimbursed 6— Is your Part B monthly subsidy for the Medicare costs of the Mary Ann Neuman, AUSWR reimbursement the selected plan. NWB leader, and Glen Post, President and CEO of Cen- right amount? The Company and AUSWR worked to turyLink meet at the 2012 An- create this proposal and together stated that they 7 — Understand nual Shareholders’ meeting at HRAs believe the Legacy Qwest Post-1990 Manage- the company’s headquarters in ment Retirees “will be pleased and will appreci- 8— Q&A on “the Monroe, Louisiana, in May. ate the joint efforts to provide some stability in a Agreement” climate of increasing changes to health care.” Thanks to CenturyLink’s Tammy Matthews for the pho- 9— Retiree Advocate For the detailed Questions & Answers for this state listings tos.
    [Show full text]
  • US V. AT&T Corp. and Mediaone Group, Inc
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) United States of America ) Antitrust Division ) Department ofJustice ) 1:oocvo111G CASE NUMBER 140 I H Street ) c. Lamberth Washington, D.C. 20530, ) JUDGE: Royce Plaintiff, ) Antitrust ) DECK TYPE: v. ) os12s12000 DATE STAMP: ) AT&T Corp. and ) MediaOne Group, Inc., ) Defendants. ) COMPLAINT The United States of America, acting under the direction ofthe Attorney General ofthe United States, brings this civil action pursuant to Section 15 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 25, to enjoin defendant AT&T Corp. ("AT&T") from acquiring defendant MediaOne Group, Inc. ("MediaOne"), in order to prevent and restrain a violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 18. Unless blocked, AT&T's acquisition of MediaOne's interest is likely to lessen competition substantially in the market for the aggregation, promotion, and distribution of broadband content. Road Runner is an Internet service provider that offers high-speed access to content through cable lines nationwide. Broadband service is technology that allows users to -1­ used telephone dial-up services. Road Runner competes with Excite@Home, in which AT&T " - owns a substantial equity interest and voting control, in aggregating, promoting and distributing broadband content. MediaOne holds a significant equity and management interest in Road Runner. Excite@Home and Road Runner serve a significant majority of the nation's residential broadband Internet users. Through the proposed merger, concentration in the market for aggregation, promotion, and distribution of residential broadband content would be substantially increased. Competition between Excite@Home and Road Runner in the provision of these services may be substantially lessened or even eliminated.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Telephone and Telegraph Company Divestiture: Background, Provisions, and Restructuring
    Report No. 84-58 E I -. <I?....*- ".YII. -n, -- THE AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY DIVESTITURE: BACKGROUND, PROVISIONS, AND RESTRUCTURING b Y Angele A. Gilroy Specialist in Industrial Organization Economics Division COLLECTION WKI HEKN !CNTUCKY LIBRARY April 11, 1984 11 i :::A L.'~~-l.ii.e makes jucn research available. without parti- ::;I.. in lr:m\ !orrns inc!uding studies. reports. cornpila- ;,)I!., I!:<?\[>. :md l:a~kqroi~ndhrietings. Cpon request. CRS .. ., :i ~ !>!r::z:rrir.e.;in ann1~-zingle+slative proposals and -tl:..b. :!nd in s>w;sinq the possible effects of these proposals . < :!I irie.The Ser~ice'ssenior specialists and ii,:c( r :iil.,;ii ?is are also at-aiiable for personal consultations ;xi-ir :.t>.;!?ecri\-elieid.; t~f'expertise. ABSTRACT On January 1, 1984, The American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) di- vested itself of a major portion of its organizational structure and functions. Under the post-divestiture environment the once fully-integrated Bell System is now reorganized into the "new" AT&T and seven Ladependent regional 5olding ?om- panies -- American Information Technologies Corp., 3ell Atlantic Corp., 3ell- South Corp., NYNEX Corp., Pacific Telesis Group., Southwestern Bell Corp., and U.S. West, Inc. The following analysis provides an overview of the pre- and post-divestiture organizational structure and details the evolution of the anti- trust action which resulted in this divestiture. CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................ iii INTRODUCTION ............................................................ 1 1 . BELL SYSTEM CORPORATE REORGANIZATION .............................. 3 A . Predivestiture Bell System Corporate Structure ................ 3 B . Divested Operating Company Structure .......................... 5 C . Post-Divestiture AThT Organizational Structure ................ 7 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Us West Coast Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species Through
    STATUS OF THE U.S. WEST COAST FISHERIES FOR HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES THROUGH 2020 STOCK ASSESSMENT AND FISHERY EVALUATION APRIL 2021 PACIFIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL 7700 NE AMBASSADOR PLACE, SUITE 101 PORTLAND, OREGON 97220 WWW.PCOUNCIL.ORG Cover illustration by Roy Allen, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, La Jolla, California 4/13/2021 8:43 AM Prepared by the Pacific Fishery Management Council in conjunction with the National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Region under National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration award number NA20NMF4410011. 2020 HMS SAFE ii April 2021 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. SAFE Document Production Schedule ......................................................................................... 1 1.2. Amendments to the Fishery Management Plan ............................................................................ 1 1.3. Management Unit Species and Ecosystem Component Species ................................................... 1 1.4. The Management Cycle ................................................................................................................ 2 1.5. Highly Migratory Species Management Team ............................................................................. 3 2. COUNCIL HMS ACTIVITIES IN 2020 .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Centurylink, Inc
    CTL 10-K 12/31/2015 Section 1: 10-K (10-K) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 or o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File No. 001-7784 CENTURYLINK, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Louisiana 72-0651161 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 100 CenturyLink Drive, Monroe, Louisiana 71203 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (318) 388-9000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, par value $1.00 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Stock Options Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • What We Have Done for You!
    Our MISSION: “To maintain a point of contact and information for telephone retirees on health care and other benefit issues.” __AUSWR CO/WY Newsletter of the retirees of CenturyLink, Qwest, U S WEST 2015 Issue 3 and their predecessor companies. www.AUSWR.org What we have done for you! Our retiree association works continually to represent you with CenturyLink, keeping in mind the pensions and beneLits that we earned in our working years. We celebrate successes, bemoan our losses… but the work goes on, thanks to all the leaders who tirelessly keep giving their efforts, most of them volunteers. —-But we cannot do it all... Curtis Kennedy has worked for us for over three decades to protect our pensions and beneLits. Below are the stories of just two leaders who —using Curtis’s expert help —make your life better. If you retired after 1990... These monthly reimbursements help make health care secure and more affordable. the Mimi Hull The protection of our $10,000 Group Life 5-year Agreement Insurance for Live years is included in the agreement. Drafting this agreement for the In April 2012, then AUSWR leader Mimi Hull HRA and life insurance was given to Curtis, successfully negotiated an agreement with who created the language that CenturyLink CenturyLink OfLicers that provides Health ofLicers quickly approved. Now we look Reimbursement Accounts (HRA) for forward to working with CenturyLink Medicare-eligible retirees and spouses for executives to extend the agreement beyond its expiration in 2017. Live years. If you retired in 1990 or before... changes. Who did he call? Curtis, of course, who Liled , and won, legal action that the Nelson Phelps guarantees ALL retirees who retired in Health Care Settlement 1990 or before (plus ERO retirees) will keep their promised health care benePits Nels realized by 1992 that, as a 1990 retiree, for life .
    [Show full text]