DOCSLIB.ORG

Centurylink, Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Centurylink, Inc CTL 10-K 12/31/2015 Section 1: 10-K (10-K) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 or o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File No. 001-7784 CENTURYLINK, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Louisiana 72-0651161 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 100 CenturyLink Drive, Monroe, Louisiana 71203 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (318) 388-9000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, par value $1.00 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Stock Options Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý On February 17, 2016, 543,852,862 shares of common stock were outstanding. The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2015 was $16.4 billion. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Portions of the Registrant's Proxy Statement to be furnished in connection with the 2016 annual meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Item 1. Business 3 Item 1A. Risk Factors 17 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 36 Item 2. Properties 37 Item 3. Legal Proceedings 37 Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 37 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 38 Item 6. Selected Financial Data 40 Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 42 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 69 Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 70 Consolidated Statements of Operations 72 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) 73 Consolidated Balance Sheets 74 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 75 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity 76 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 77 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 122 Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 122 Item 9B. Other Information 123 PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 123 Item 11. Executive Compensation 123 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 124 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence 124 Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 124 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 125 Signatures 138 2 Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Annual Report to "CenturyLink," "we," "us" and "our" refer to CenturyLink, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS Overview We are an integrated communications company engaged primarily in providing an array of communications services to our residential and business customers. Our communications services include local and long-distance voice, high-speed Internet, Multi-Protocol Label Switching ("MPLS"), private line (including special access), data integration, Ethernet, colocation, managed hosting (including cloud hosting), network, public access, video, wireless and other ancillary services. We strive to maintain our customer relationships by, among other things, bundling our service offerings to provide our customers with a complete offering of integrated communications services. Based on our approximately 11.7 million total access lines at December 31, 2015, we believe we are the third largest wireline telecommunications company in the United States. We operate 74% of our total access lines in portions of Colorado, Arizona, Washington, Minnesota, Florida, North Carolina, Oregon, Iowa, Utah, New Mexico, Missouri, and Nevada. We also provide local service in portions of Idaho, Ohio, Wisconsin, Virginia, Texas, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, Montana, Alabama, Indiana, Arkansas, Wyoming, Tennessee, New Jersey, South Dakota, North Dakota, Kansas, Louisiana, South Carolina, Michigan, Illinois, Georgia, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and California. In the portion of these 37 states where we have access lines, which we refer to as our local service area, we are the incumbent local telephone company. At December 31, 2015, we served approximately 6.0 million high-speed Internet subscribers and 285 thousand Prism TV subscribers. We also operate 59 data centers throughout North America, Europe and Asia. We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Louisiana in 1968. Our principal executive offices are located at 100 CenturyLink Drive, Monroe, Louisiana 71203 and our telephone number is (318) 388-9000. For a discussion of certain risks applicable to our business, see "Risk Factors" in Item 1A of Part I of this Annual Report. The summary financial information in this section should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by reference to, our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Item 8 and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report. Financial and Operational Highlights The following table summarizes the results of our consolidated operations: Years Ended December 31, 2015(1) 2014(2) 2013(3) (Dollars in millions) Consolidated statements of operations summary results: Operating revenues $ 17,900 18,031 18,095 Operating expenses 15,295 15,621 16,642 Operating income $ 2,605 2,410 1,453 Net income (loss) $ 878 772 (239 ) _______________________________________________________________________________ (1) During 2015, we recognized an incremental $215 million of revenue associated with the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") Connect America Fund Phase 2 support program. For additional information, see Note 1—Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report. (2) During 2014, we recognized a $60 million tax benefit associated with a deduction for the tax basis for worthless stock in a wholly-owned foreign subsidiary and a $63 million pension settlement charge. For additional information, see Note 13—Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report. (3) During 2013, we recorded a non-cash, non-tax-deductible goodwill impairment charge of $1.092 billion for goodwill attributed to one of our previous operating segments and a litigation settlement charge of $235 million. 3 The following table summarizes certain selected financial information from our consolidated balance sheets: As of December 31, 2015 2014 (Dollars in millions) Consolidated balance sheets summary information: (1) Total assets $ 47,604 49,103 (1) (2) Total long-term debt 20,225 20,503 Total stockholders' equity 14,060 15,023 _______________________________________________________________________________ (1) We adopted both ASU 2015-03 "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" and ASU 2015-17 "Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes" by retrospectively applying the requirements of the ASUs to our previously issued consolidated financial statements. See further discussion in Note 1—Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basic Meridian 61C Configuration Example
    174543 Basic Meridian 61C Configuration Example Key ParIS Listing for a 9-1-1 Conliguration (I) Top Cap Module: provides air e"haust and environmental monitoring. Redundant 61C ullng Motorola'Iaa060 Call Processor and Releale 23 loftware (2) Inlelli.ont Peripheral Equipmenl: contain. tholrunk.line and :\IF cards. (2 Columnlor 1 Bay) (al Dici••' liM Canh (NTaOUUI)o Each aid ,~m 16 Voice 3M 16 DIU! portS I'. Tna.k ell"1I fNYIOU ••). Ext. ~ suppiOfU II Tnriu Ie) ~"'d·fl"fq~'· (ilreh INTACJ'M~ This card 4tmdn the ~tF lO.nct uKd in '101·1 ANI. 1 QN per columll cd) TI c••nl'lft'll rriwlll~ Rlill' ..",..tan CilnII - Uted 10 dcl;"'cr C.ller lD 10 the PSAP (dl 'ttip""nl [~ifllM'" ' ....r/R", Cue"'." ~nD2IAB)' One ror. each IPE shelf. (1) Top CapModule (el COIll,rOUtr Clint t~nDlIliC). Pro, ide!; itlterf3C"'K bcI"ecn lhe Supcrloop S,-"",on. Card;and the IPE ~odule. (1/ Top C.p "'pOOle to IP£·,\tAX (~TI RII1IA). (O...io...I) (NT7000BAI (I) CCR·IP[ (NTI RlllllA" tOpC","IIU (NT7000BA) (3) CoreF."etwork ~Iodule: contain. a "olorola 68060 CPL:, 'Iemory. Di.k/CD ROM, Superloop 7Iletwork cards., (;1) C.,.,fT.rw .,,,1 Dicil ~..r"J fNTlIDI7).. One fot QCh COrcINCf"OB .\1oduk. This card P'O' Mfa d;altonc,1Pd de,ock's ,he: DThIF lann (2) hleUigeT1l Peripheral (bl SUIMr'tMp Su...", C.rlb (NT.DU.-.A). One (or lOxh Corc:JNet ~lodule Pnn ides 01 lime Ilice (or each QII ~ pmcc:ss EqUipment Module te) C.....'III [14uip_.t ' ...eor (I'liInD~A.'" PO" a' (or the Cof'dNC1 !\lodulc(S) (NT8037EC) 2) htelligent Peripheral (d) "ull'~,..'1lftM Seri.1 Oat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout, 50 Hastings L.J
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 50 | Issue 6 Article 5 1-1999 The aM gnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout Jim Chen Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jim Chen, The Magnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout, 50 Hastings L.J. 1503 (1999). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol50/iss6/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. The Magnificent Seven: American Telephony's Deregulatory Shootout by JIM CHEN* Table of Contents I. High N oon .................................................................................. 1504 II. The Gunslingers, Then and Now ...................... 1506 A. The Opening Round ........................................................... 1507 B. The Magnificent Seven ...................................................... 1511 (1) POTS and PANS, Hedgehogs and Foxes ................... 1511 (2) Lord Low Everything Else ................. 1513 III. The Legal Mothers of Merger Mania ...................................... 1514 A. Statutory Starters .............. ............ 1515 (1) Section 251 and Allied Provisions ............................... 1516 (2) Section 271: BOC Entry into InterLATA Carriage .1519 * Professor of Law and Vance K. Opperman Research
    [Show full text]
  • January 15, 2015 Meeting – Supplemental Packet
    Title II and the Ka- Ching! Factor Consumers, Carriers and Economy MIGHT all take a hit 12/01/2014 8:00 AM Eastern By: John Eggerton TakeAway Foes of Title II network-neutrality regulations are making the case that such rules would hit carriers, consumers and the economy right in the wallet. WASHINGTON — Reclassifying Internet access under Title II could be a big hit in the pocketbook for both consumers and Internet-service providers. That potential hit to the bottom line is one of many fronts industry players have opened in their battle against the push for reclassifying ISPs under some form of Title II common- carrier regulations. As Federal Communications Commission chairman Tom Wheeler ponders that reclassification under pressure from the White House and Silicon Valley, foes of that strategy are fighting back with economic arguments in an effort to dissuade him. They may have a little more time to make that case. Most FCC observers now anticipate that the agency is targeting February at the earliest, or more likely March, for new Internet-neutrality rules. An interim item seeking comment on the flurry of new options under consideration is also possible. In the meantime, ISPs and others have been amassing their arguments, including the one focused on Title II’s economic fallout. The American Consumer Institute told the FCC that reclassifying Internet access under Title II common-carrier regulations would be a big tax hit on U.S. consumers that would depress, not stimulate, the economy. In a letter to Wheeler and the other commissioners, ACI president Steve Pociask said that increased tax exposure could take many forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission Record DA 89-65
    4 FCC Red No. 3 Federal Communications Commission Record DA 89-65 3. On the basis of the statements contained in the Before the parties' joint motion, we conclude that there are no long­ Federal Communications Commission er issues in controversy and the proceedings should be Washington, D.C. 20554 terminated. 4. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to author­ ity delegated in Section 0.291 of the Commission's Rules, In the Matter of 47 C.F.R. § 0.291, that the Joint Motion to Dismiss filed by AT&T and Centel IS GRANTED. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS 5. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-cap­ Complainant, tioned complaints ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and these proceedings ARE HEREBY TERMINATED. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CENTRAL TELEPHONE File Nos. E-88-67 COMPANY OF TEXAS, CENTRAL TELEPHONE E-88-68 Gregory J. Vogt COMPANY OF OHIO, Chief, Enforcement Division Common Carrier Bureau CENTRAL TELEPHONE E-88-69 COMPANY - MINNESOTA and CENTRAL TELEPHONE E-88-70 COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, Defendants. ORDER Adopted: January 23, 1989; Released: February 2, 1989 By the Chief, Enforcement Division, Common Carrier Bureau: 1. We have before us a joint motion filed December 28, 1988 by AT&T Communications (AT&T) and Central Telephone Company of Texas, Central Telephone Com­ pany of Ohio, Central Telephone Company - Minnesota and Central Telephone Company of Illinois (collectively "Centel"), requesting that we dismiss with prejudice the above-captioned complaint proceedings and approve the parties' settlement agreement. 2. These proceedings were initiated by formal com­ plaints filed by AT&T against Centel on April 22, 1988 alleging that the defendants' earnings for interstate access services for the period October 1, 1985 through Decem­ ber 31, 1986, exceeded the rate of return authorized by the Commission in Authorized Rates of Return for Inter­ state Services for AT & T and Exchange Telephone Car­ riers, CC Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Centurylink™TM Columbia, SC 29201 Tel:Tel 803.252.4505803 252Rt505
    - / 38- E1 Fp~ 1122 Lady Street, Suite 1050 CenturyLiakCenturyLink™TM Columbia, SC 29201 Tel:Tel 803.252.4505803 252rt505 VIA HAND DELIVERY June 29, 2012 Jocelyn D. Boyd, Esquire Chief Clerk and Administrator Public Service Commission of SouthSouth Carolina 101 Executive Center Drive, Suite 100 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 Re: Certification of the Use of Universal Service Funds pursuant to 4747 C.F.R. §§55 54.313, 54.314;54,314; and Telecommunications Act §5 254 (e) CC Docket No. 96-45 Dear Ms. Boyd:Boyd: On November 18, 2011 the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") released its USF/ICC Transformation Order in WC Docket No. 10-90 et al. With that Order, the FCC began a transition toto a national framework for certification of Eligible Telecommunications Carriers ("ETCs") and setset forth a standard set of information that all ETCs must file by April 1 of each year. The Order also requiredrequired ETCs to provide thethe same informationinformation to the respective state commissions. In subsequent orders, issued on February 3, and May 14, 2012, the FCC modified certain ofof the reporting requirements to comply with the federal Paperwork Reduction Act and revisedrevised its rules toto move the annual filing date to July I1 of each year For 2012,2012, ETCs must filefile information that fulfills 47 C.F.R. 54.313(a)(2) through (a)(6)(a)(6) to the extentextent thethe informationinformation has been collected pursuant to state ETC certification requirements and 47 C.F.R. 54.313(h) by July 2,2, 2012. CenturyLink hereby provides the informationinformation that fulfills 47 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • EXHIBIT 1 Centurylink Subsidary List CENTURYLINK, INC
    EXHIBIT 1 CenturyLink Subsidary List CENTURYLINK, INC. List of Subsidiaries (As of February 13, 2012) Subsidiary Actel, LLC Bloomingdale Telephone Company, Inc. Century Cellunet International, Inc. Cellunet of India Limited Century Interactive Fax, Inc. Century Telephone of West Virginia, Inc. CenturyTel Acquisition LLC CenturyTel of Adamsville, Inc. CenturyTel of Arkansas, Inc. CenturyTel Broadband Services, LLC CenturyTel TeleVideo, Inc. CenturyTelfTeleview of Wisconsin, Tnc. v Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. CenturyTel Broadband Wireless, LLC CenturyTel of Central Indiana, Inc. CenturyTel of Central Louisiana, LLC CenturyT el of Chatham, LLC CenturyTel of Chester, Inc. CenturyTel of Claiborne, Inc. CenturyTel of East Louisiana, LLC Centu1yTel of Evangeline, LLC Century Tel Fiber Company II, LLC CenturyTel Holdings, Inc. Century Marketing Solutions, LLC CenturyTel Arkansas Holdings, Inc. CentlllyTel of Central Arkansas, LLC CenturyTel ofNorthwest Arkansas, LLC Century Tel Holdings Alabama, lnc. Century Tel of Alabama LLC CenturyTe l Holdings Missouri, Inc. CenturyTel of Missouri, LLC ctl org struct\sublist.word - 1 - February 15, 2012 Subsidiary CenturyTel Investments of Texas, lnc. Century Tel of the Northwest, Inc. Brown Equipment Corp. Carter Company, Inc. Honomach PR, Inc. Cascade Autovon Company CcnturyTei/Cable Layers, Inc. CenturyTel of Central Wisconsin, LLC CenturyTel of Colorado, Inc. CenturyTel ofEagle, Inc. CenturyTel of Eastern Oregon, lnc. CenturyTel Entertainment, Inc. CenturyTel ofFairwater-Brandon-Aito, LLC Centu.ryTel of Forestville, LLC CenturyTel of the Gem State, Inc. CenturyTel oflnter Island, Inc. CenturyTel of Larsen-Readfield, LLC CenturyTel of the Midwest-Kendall, LLC CenturyTel of the Midwest-Wisconsin, LLC CenturyTel ofMinnesota, Inc. CenturyTel of Monroe County, LLC CenturyTel of Montana, Inc. CenturyTel of Northern Wisconsin, LLC CenturyTel ofNorthwest Wisconsin, LLC CenturyTel of Oregon, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission PA 19-700 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission PA 19-700 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 ) In the Matter of ) File No. EB-TCD-16-00022562 ) CenturyLink, Inc. ) Account No.: 201932170002 ) ) FRN: 0018626853 ADOPTING ORDER Adopted: August 12, 2019 Released: August 13, 2019 By the Deputy Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. The Enforcement Bureau (Bureau) of the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) and CenturyLink, Inc. have entered into a Consent Decree to resolve the Bureau’s investigation into whether CenturyLink violated section 20 1(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Communications Act), by placing unauthorized third-party charges on customers’ wireline telephone bills. As part of its investigation, the Bureau received customer complaints about CenturyLink’s third-party billing practices. The complaints alleged that customers had been assessed unauthorized charges on their CenturyLink bills for long distance services from various third-party resellers. Customers also claimed that they had difficulty getting timely refunds for these charges. To resolve this investigation, CenturyLink has agreed to pay a $550,000 settlement amount to the United States Treasury. Additionally, CenturyLink has agreed to discontinue these types of third-party billing arrangements, with limited exceptions, and to implement a process for providing refunds or credits to customers with valid complaints about unauthorized charges. 2. After reviewing the terms of the Consent Decree and evaluating the facts before us, we find that the public interest would be served by adopting the Consent Decree and terminating the referenced investigation regarding CenturyLink’ s compliance with section 201(b) of the Communications Act. 3. In the absence of material new evidence relating to this matter, we conclude that our investigation raises no substantial or material questions of fact as to whether CenturyLink possesses the basic qualifications, including those related to character, to hold or obtain any Commission licenses or authorization.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Meeting: Study session Meeting date: September 14, 2020 Written report: 7 Executive summary Title: Comcast franchise renewal update Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is Categorized as Time-Sensitive** • The report is presented for information only. No action is required. Policy consideration: Is the progress on the franchise renewal in keeping with council expectations? Summary: The city’s current franchise agreement with Comcast expires in January 2021. Upon receipt of Comcast’s request to renew its cable franchise in the city, the city notified Comcast of its intent to conduct informal renewal negotiations in accordance with the federal Cable Act. To prepare for negotiations, the city evaluated Comcast’s past performance under the existing franchise and conducted a needs assessment to determine the future cable-related Public- Educational-Government (PEG) community needs and interests of the city. This is the criteria prescribed by the Cable Act. Following the conclusion of the needs assessment, the city’s cable franchise attorney developed a draft franchise agreement, which the city plans to submit to Comcast for consideration. Financial or budget considerations: The final franchise agreement will determine the franchise fee, based on a percentage of gross revenues derived from cable service and PEG (public- educational-government) capital funding to be received by the city over the next franchise term, expected to be 10 years. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Community needs assessment report and appendices October 28, 2019 council study session report Prepared by: Jacque Smith, communications and marketing manager Reviewed by: Clint Pires, chief information officer Brian Grogan, attorney at law, Moss & Barnett Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager Study session meeting of Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 17-627 In The Supreme Court of the United States -------------------------- ♦ --------------------------- SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., Petitioner, v. CENTURYTEL OF CHATHAM, LLC, ET AL., Respondents. -------------------------- ♦ -------------------------- ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT -------------------------- ♦ -------------------------- BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI -------------------------- ♦ -------------------------- MICHAEL J. LOCKERBY EDWARD H. BERGIN Counsel of Record MARK A. MINTZ BENJAMIN R. DRYDEN JONES WALKER LLP JARREN N. GINSBURG 201 St. Charles Avenue FOLEY & LARDNER LLP Suite 5100 Washington Harbour New Orleans, Louisiana 70170 3000 K Street, N.W. (504) 582-8000 Sixth Floor [email protected] Washington, D.C. 20007 [email protected] (202) 672-5300 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Respondents Dated: November 30, 2017 THE LEX GROUPDC 1825 K Street, N.W. Suite 103 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 955-0001 (800) 856-4419 Fax: (202) 955-0022 www.thelexgroup.com i QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether, in the absence of either Federal Communications Commission or judicial precedent to the contrary, the Fifth Circuit erred in holding that a telecommunications carrier’s retroactive clawback against undisputed charges, based on estimates that were found to be unreasonable, was either “unjust” or “unreasonable” within the meaning of 47 U.S.C. § 201(b). 2. Whether Sprint waived its argument
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Telecom Meltdown for a Listing of Recent Titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, Turn to the Back of This Book
    The Great Telecom Meltdown For a listing of recent titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, turn to the back of this book. The Great Telecom Meltdown Fred R. Goldstein a r techhouse. com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the U.S. Library of Congress. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Goldstein, Fred R. The great telecom meltdown.—(Artech House telecommunications Library) 1. Telecommunication—History 2. Telecommunciation—Technological innovations— History 3. Telecommunication—Finance—History I. Title 384’.09 ISBN 1-58053-939-4 Cover design by Leslie Genser © 2005 ARTECH HOUSE, INC. 685 Canton Street Norwood, MA 02062 All rights reserved. Printed and bound in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Artech House cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. International Standard Book Number: 1-58053-939-4 10987654321 Contents ix Hybrid Fiber-Coax (HFC) Gave Cable Providers an Advantage on “Triple Play” 122 RBOCs Took the Threat Seriously 123 Hybrid Fiber-Coax Is Developed 123 Cable Modems
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Interconnection Matrix
    TEBEAU AFFIDAVIT – ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT B PACIFIC BELL SUMMARY WIRELINE INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT LIST Section 271 Application Interconnection Agreements CLEC/Agreement Signed Date Agr. A.L./Appl/ Approval/ Term Expiration Filed Decision No. Effective Date CPUC Date 1. @Link Networks, Inc. (formerly Dakota 7/5/00 A.L. 3 EFF. 7/26/00 -- 03/14/01 Services) (Int. Agr. - S. 252 – MFN to Prism California Operations)** 2. 01 Communications (formerly Option One) 1/7/00 A.L. 3 EFF. 1/23/00 -- 06/29/01 (Int. Agr. - Sec. 252 - MFN to Pac-West)** 3. 1-800-RECONEX (Resale Agr.-Sec. 252- MFN 4/28/00 A.L. 1 EFF. 5/14/00 -- 02/10/01 to NOW)** 4. 2 nd Century (Int. Agreement - Section 252 - 5/26/00 A.L. 1-A EFF. 6/17/00 -- See MFN to WorldCom Technologies)** WorldCom 5. Access One (Interconnection Agreement - Sec. 9/1/00 A.L. 21360 APP. 11/21/00 10/31/01 252) Res. T-16468 EFF. 12/1/00 6. Adelphia Business Solutions Operations, Inc. 4/19/00 A. L. 3 EFF. 5/13/00 -- 06/29/01 (Int. Agr.- Sec. 252 - MFN to Pac West)** 7. Advanced Data Communications (Resale Agr. - 9/14/99 A.L. 20571 APP. 10/21/99 -- 11/28/00 Sec. 252) Agr. Signed Sept. 3, 1999 Res. T-16358 EFF. 10/31/99 8. Advanced Telcom Group, Inc. (Int. Agr.-Sec. 12/9/98 A.L. 19872 Res. T-16270 -- 07/03/00 252 - MFN to ACN) Agr. Signed 12/1/98 EFF. 2/18/99 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Watch Cartoons Online Teen Titans Judas Contract
    Watch Cartoons Online Teen Titans Judas Contract diademJudaic and unpreparedly. brotherly Alonso Succubous never Gabriellodolomitizes sometimes nearer when shreddings Goddart his dematerialise simmering spokewise his pyracanthas. and undrew Gravest so capriciously!Beaufort Dc brand new password incorrect, watch online english dub kisscartoon the world, the conclusion of freeland. So if this twisting tale of time to the whole lot of the padawans, by drag and. User is teen titans cartoon online cartoons than judas contract is also the teens are and. He is teen titans cartoon online cartoons, judas contract was given to a family in a society caught glimpses of your tv shows no. Teen Titans The Judas Contract Video 2017 IMDb. The judas contract online english dub kisscartoon. That easy only partialy delivered and partialy was a disapointment. Game ever Of Titans Cartoon Network Games Unlocked Starfire. Nov 23 2020 The Raiders signed Incognito to bend two-year contract extension in the offseason. This is teen titans cartoon online cartoons than judas contract on the girl group but the unstoppable teen titans follows the magami academy on. The characterisation and dialogue is corny and the plot is bake and nonsensical. Is Tidying Up with Marie Kondo on Netflix? English HD Movies, Style Tips, Judas Contract is pretty stale. Only take on online cartoons than judas contract. Other streaming online kisscartoon synopsis: teen titan comic format and gets a contract. The cartoon network animated movie. Keyword must contend with those fashion trends and including additional suggestions to. While firm plot revolves around certain major betrayal that could potentially lead the Teen Titans to their demise, were the DCEU version might set the worst.
    [Show full text]